![]() |
|
|
| |
« Crisp-Ramirez Trade Reactions | Main | Latest On A.J. Burnett »
4:39pm: Tony Jackson of the L.A. Daily News shoots down all Dodgers rumors - no offer in the near future for Sabathia, no talks for Halladay, and no interest in Raul Ibanez.
I think Graziano's Halladay musings have been distorted a bit - he basically said the Blue Jays might explore the trade market at some point.
3:31pm: Graziano adds in a new post that the Giants plan to make a six-year offer in excess of $100MM but under $140MM. Tom Haudricourt had info about a Giants bid several hours earlier as well.
Haudricourt adds that the Angels will make a bid, but reports about the Dodgers may be inaccurate.
12:26pm: Dan Graziano of the Newark Star-Ledger explains why C.C. Sabathia is taking his time while mulling over the Yankees' six-year, $140MM offer. Graziano believes Sabathia and his agents are waiting to see what the Dodgers propose.
Graziano speaks of "rumblings today that the Dodgers either have offered or are about to offer Sabathia a six-year contract worth between $110 and $120 million." He believes this could compel the Yankees to increase their offer, just to ensure a ridiculous ($30MM+) gap between the two proposals.
Graziano has a source who continues to insist the Blue Jays will explore the market for ace Roy Halladay, who has two years and $30MM left on his deal. In that case, he believes the Dodgers are the most likely match. If the Dodgers acquire Halladay, they would focus on Manny Ramirez rather than Sabathia.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e201053603db8c970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Graziano's Latest: Sabathia, Halladay:


|
|
If LA wants an ACE, CC is the way to go. They're aided by his love for the west coast and NL, assuming they can come within range of Yankees, they have a very good shot at landing him.
Posted by: Kenan and Kel | November 19, 2008 at 12:30 PM
Halladay in the NL West? That's a pretty scary thought...for other NL West teams and other NL Cy Young contenders anyways. How much would it take the Dodgers to get him? An absolute ton, to say the least.
Posted by: palehose35 | November 19, 2008 at 12:32 PM
Kenan and Kel....I'd take Halladay over CC anyday. Halladay is as much an ace as any pitcher in baseball.
Posted by: palehose35 | November 19, 2008 at 12:33 PM
I dont know, Holliday would rake in the NL if healthy, hes an NL player by design, dominant with the ability and desire to pitch the whole game, he loves to keep the bullpen out of his affairs. Dodgers should take him over Sabathia anyday, from a money and i think even a numbers stand point as well
Posted by: 04Forever | November 19, 2008 at 12:34 PM
2 years 30 million, compared to 6/120 for the same thing, i mean come on
Posted by: 04Forever | November 19, 2008 at 12:35 PM
I would not want the Yanks to increase their offer from 140 which is already too much. If he wants more, I would tell hem go play for LA and try to sign Tex.
Posted by: DominicanYanks | November 19, 2008 at 12:35 PM
Im calling BS on this one.
Every time some bored sports writer has a day dream and makes a prediction of Halladay being traded, both Halladay and the Blue Jays squash the rumour quickly.
Why do people keep starting random BS rumours like this?
It must be nice to be a sports writer and just make things up randomly to seem like youre an insider.
This is the equivalent of an EKLUND hockey rumour and for those that dont know who Eklund is. He is an anonymus hockey blogger that claims to be an insider when all he does is invent trade rumours just to have teams and players squash them within a day.
Posted by: xethicx | November 19, 2008 at 12:36 PM
"Why do people keep starting random BS rumours like this?"
because baseball writers need something to do in the offseason and stories like this sell papers.
Posted by: yankeegirl49 | November 19, 2008 at 12:38 PM
16 of his starts were against either the Rays, Yankees, or Red Sox, and he still put up huge numbers. That he had 31 decisions speaks to how deep he goes into games, and that he managed 20 wins out of those decisions with the worst offense in their division, and one of the worst in the league, is even more impressive. I really think he was the best pitcher in baseball last season.
Posted by: palehose35 | November 19, 2008 at 12:39 PM
i say halladay IS the best pitcher in baseball...
i would offer buchholz/bowden/lars anderson/daniel bard/ellsbury/the entire lowell spinners team/and tom brady for him.
Posted by: Boston Belongs To Me | November 19, 2008 at 12:40 PM
I say again to Frank Wren: forget Peavy and go after Halladay. I'm sure he's not actually available, but...According to Tim's outlook, they need a SS, DH, starters and bullpen help. Escobar, Hanson, Soriano, Moylan and whoever the hell else they want. Hell, sign Manny and trade him in that package...Halladay would be ridiculous in the NL.
Posted by: daslied | November 19, 2008 at 12:41 PM
The difference between Halladay and Sabathia isn't just the money. It's also the prospects the Dodgers would have to give up. Logan White loves his young players (as well he should) and had stopped trades before involving his kids. Sabathia, while an injury risk (and I think he's a massive one within the next 3 years) allows the Dodgers to keep all the kids. Even if it means losing Manny (which is bad if you can sign Manny for 3 years).
Posted by: DodgersBruin | November 19, 2008 at 12:41 PM
lol to boston belongs to me
Posted by: 04Forever | November 19, 2008 at 12:41 PM
but yes, xethicx i really don't see halladay being moved. it's a make or break season for ricciardi, and whether or not it would be a good long-term decision, it's not a move he'd make right now. the public doesn't trust him enough to make that kind of move, and the last thing he wants is any more public pressure for his firing than already exists.
Posted by: palehose35 | November 19, 2008 at 12:42 PM
"Kenan and Kel....I'd take Halladay over CC anyday. Halladay is as much an ace as any pitcher in baseball."
Did I say CC was the better pitcher?
CC cost cash.
Halladay would rape the Dodgers system/young guys.
Posted by: Kenan and Kel | November 19, 2008 at 12:44 PM
Halladay isn't going anwhere.
Posted by: rememberthecoop | November 19, 2008 at 12:44 PM
gotta think that the Jays asking price starts with Billingsley, and goes up from there.
Posted by: jakec | November 19, 2008 at 12:45 PM
You said if they really want an ACE to get CC, so I thought it was implied. If not, forget it. These mix ups happen, especially on message boards.
Posted by: palehose35 | November 19, 2008 at 12:45 PM
If Halladay is available, expect EVERYONE to be interested.
I would not be surprised to Texas offer something like Feliz and Andrus and possibly another top 100 guy for starters.
Halladay would get a kings ransom for Tor
Posted by: laxtonto | November 19, 2008 at 12:46 PM
moving halladay would probably be good for the team, he came off an amazing season and he has a reasonable contract, i think you could get 2 star prospects in a 5 for 1 player trade, i really think that they should consider it, because last year proved that even when halladay is having a career year, it still wont help the team, they need to improve in other areas very very much so
Posted by: 04Forever | November 19, 2008 at 12:46 PM
Daslied, I agree: I'd much rather the Braves get Halladay than Peavy - especially at this point. But Halladay's most likely not going anywhere. And as far as CC goes, the Yanks are going to overpay to the point of CC having no other choice other than to accept. I don't see why the Dodgers wouldn't have the best chance with Manny though.
Posted by: drphonic7 | November 19, 2008 at 12:47 PM
So how about Braves trade
Escobar - SS
Flowers - DH Type
Melden - Bullpen
Boyer - Bullpen
Roghbrough/Locke - Starter
Morton/Reyes - Starter
Would that get em?
Posted by: drumzalicious | November 19, 2008 at 12:47 PM
"I would not be surprised to Texas offer something like Feliz and Andrus and possibly another top 100 guy for starters."
Two prospects? And possibly another top 100?
I know the Rangers are loaded but you'd have to imagine Roy Halladay would be worth some major league talent.
Posted by: Kenan and Kel | November 19, 2008 at 12:52 PM
I don't think Graziano made anything up. He was alone mentioning Halladay this summer, and was very careful to say that the Jays were only quietly exploring his value.
Posted by: Tim Dierkes | November 19, 2008 at 12:54 PM
Drumzalicious, you'd have to include Hanson. Which I'd be fine with for Halladay, even for two years of him.
Posted by: daslied | November 19, 2008 at 12:55 PM
IF the Jays trade Holladay...i am going back to Hockey....Go Leafs....
Posted by: jays4life | November 19, 2008 at 12:57 PM
I would give YanksFanSince78's right arm for Halladay.
Wonder what the Phils could have that would interest the Jays? Donald, Carrasco, Marson and Quintin Berry? I'd rather try to avoid Michael taylor if i could.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | November 19, 2008 at 12:58 PM
I would hope that Halladay is available for trade, maybe (seeing as the Peavy talks broke down/never happened seriously) the Yankees could offer something for him? I'd be willing to give up ANYONE except Gardner, AJax, and Hughes(with the possible exeption of Christian) for him.... Imagine a Yankees rotation of:
CC
Halladay
Wang
Moose/Burnett/Pettitte
Joba
it pretty much GUARANTEES a playoff spot, say CC wins 19, Halladay wins 19, Wang wins 18, Moose/burnett win 15-18
Joba wins 15 thats 90 games in the bag MINIMUM, plus maybe another 10 from the pen? oooooh yeah!
how does this sound for Halladay (Im guessing the Jays are looking for prospects/salary dump in their favor?)
Kennedy
Melky
Igawa (as a filler only)
and say another prospect or two? Maybe even Swisher if the yanks sign Tex....
Dear Mr. Cashman/Mr. Steinbrenner
If you are reading this I would like nothing more than for you to try to sign Mark Teixeira, CC Sabathia, and trade for Roy Halladay, as well as trying to resign Moose....
maybe asking in written form will work? hehe
Yanks in '09
Posted by: aguirrem2 | November 19, 2008 at 12:59 PM
Yeah, any deal involving Halladay would START with a young MLB player with star potential.
After that you're talking about the inclusion of something like 2 of the team's top 3 prospects.
From Atlanta, I'd imagine something like Escobar, Hanson, Hernandez would be a decent starting package.
Posted by: Acekicker123 | November 19, 2008 at 12:59 PM
aguirrem2-
Please, I beg of you, never post anything idiotic like that again. Thank You in advance.
And I thought all talk of CC wanting to play only on the west coast was just rumors?
Posted by: Thirty5Thirty6 | November 19, 2008 at 01:04 PM
alright I'll add Victorino to my package from the Phils and also include YanksFanSince78's left arm as well.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | November 19, 2008 at 01:06 PM
aquirrem2....
let me get this straight, you wouldn't give up jackson, hughes or gardner for halladay????????????? i think that any sane yankee fan would.
oh wait, i just saw your kennedy, cabrera, igawa for halladay offer. yeah, sorry for criticizing you. that's a great, fair deal.
Posted by: Boston Belongs To Me | November 19, 2008 at 01:07 PM
oh, and aquirrem2, i have some magic beans, ya know, if you're interested.
Posted by: Boston Belongs To Me | November 19, 2008 at 01:08 PM
That might've been one of the worst offers I have ever seen.
I'm actually embarrassed FOR you.
Posted by: Acekicker123 | November 19, 2008 at 01:08 PM
this is probably the first and last time i will agree with thirty5thirty6, that trade proposal is just awful. kennedy is the big catch in a deal for arguable the best pitcher in baseball, seriously. youd need to give him with hughes and melky AND cano without even blinking an eye
Posted by: 04Forever | November 19, 2008 at 01:09 PM
Did I just see a Yankees fan say Gardner would be a deal breaker in a trade for Roy Halladay?
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | November 19, 2008 at 01:10 PM
"I'd be willing to give up ANYONE except Gardner, AJax, and Hughes(with the possible exeption of Christian) for him.... "
dude.
a deal involving halladay would start with Hughes and someone else from that list. the jays don't want your yankee rejects.
in fact, i don't think the yanks have what it takes to get doc for 2 years on $30 mil.
Posted by: RobTheGood | November 19, 2008 at 01:11 PM
I have trouble seeing the Phil being able to put together a package that would interest Toronto without the inclusion of Cole Hamels.
Posted by: Acekicker123 | November 19, 2008 at 01:11 PM
I have trouble seeing the Phil being able to put together a package that would interest Toronto without the inclusion of Cole Hamels.
ALRIGHT, stop right there. we're done this discussion. That's just crazy talk. Hamels is untouchable and controllable for at least 3-4 years.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | November 19, 2008 at 01:13 PM
hahahahahah - hey, i got one. chase wright for albert pujols. the cards need pitching, and the yanks get a first baseman.
any offer for halladay starts with joba + cano. hughes is still a AAA pitcher folks.
Posted by: the_kid_01 | November 19, 2008 at 01:13 PM
"I'd be willing to give up ANYONE except Gardner, AJax, and Hughes"
K then I guess you prefer to start with Joba?
Who entertains trading for one of the best pitchers in either league and immediately declares their two most tradable/valuable assets as off limits?
Posted by: Kenan and Kel | November 19, 2008 at 01:14 PM
When are people going to listen. Hanson is "untouchable," meaning he's not going to be TRADED. Not for Peavy, not for Halladay, not even for A-rod or Sabathia or Webb or any other player you want to mention.
Stop being so dense.
Posted by: garlick | November 19, 2008 at 01:14 PM
Ok, I appologize for my comment above. I was having one of those kid in a candystore moments. Coming back down to reality, I probably would give up some of those prospects for halladay. Realistically I'm not a very big fan of Hughes, but I think he *MIGHT* be able to pull it off later, Kennedy I think would be a very good pitcher, for a team in a smaller market. I'd have no problem parting ways with either of the two (if not both) for Halladay, but AJax is off the table (in my mind anyway). And I think that Gardner is an asset to the future for us, because Damon's contract is up next year and if we re-sign him it'll be as a DH (I'd have Gardner in Left, Jackson in Center and Nady/Someone else in Right for 2010).
Realistically here's what I'd offer:
Kennedy
Igawa
Hughes
Melky
Cano (infact I'd like to get rid of him, but there are few alternatives not named Orlando Hudson)
but I'd expect Halladay and another (low level) prospect from the Jays.
Oh, and one last thing, if you're gonna bash me, please get my name right, its aguirrem2 with a g not a q.....
Posted by: aguirrem2 | November 19, 2008 at 01:16 PM
That's not true, Garlick. There are players the Braves would trade Hanson for, just not one's that have 8 figure contracts, possible elbow issues and an owner desperate to trade them. Tommy Hanson, while a great prospect, is not the single most valuable asset in all of major league baseball.
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | November 19, 2008 at 01:16 PM
aguirrem2,
you're an idiot.
Kennedy/Melky/Igawa/crappy prospect for Hallaway?
Wow, Yankee fans are so diluted.
Any deal would have to include at least Joba or Hughes and Ajax plus a couple more solid pieces.
You're talking about a bonafide ACE.
Posted by: cfitz88 | November 19, 2008 at 01:17 PM
Drumz, I do think your deal would get Halladay. The Jays need an SS, could use a power hitting Catching prospect as well as a few SPs. They'd have to consider 2009 a "rebuilding" year though. That said: is all that really worth only 2 years of Halladay?
And anyone else mentioning Hanson can forget it. He's not going anywhere.
Posted by: drphonic7 | November 19, 2008 at 01:17 PM
realistic yankee trade for Halladay:
Phil Hughes
Austin Jackson
Andrew Brackman
Robinson Cano/Melky Cabrera
Ian Kennedy
Posted by: 04Forever | November 19, 2008 at 01:17 PM
garlick,
so you're saying, my half a pastrami sandwich for hanson deal has no shot?
it's got dijon....
Posted by: Boston Belongs To Me | November 19, 2008 at 01:19 PM
"Wow, Yankee fans are so diluted."
So the entire Yankee fanbase has been made thinner by the addition of water or another liquid. Good one, bro. Good one.
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | November 19, 2008 at 01:20 PM
aguirem2,
you're still in that candy store. Come back to reality. Again start with Joba and move on from there. And as HiHater6 said they won't trade in their division and possibly see him 4 times a year.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | November 19, 2008 at 01:20 PM
"When are people going to listen. Hanson is "untouchable," meaning he's not going to be TRADED. Not for Peavy, not for Halladay, not even for A-rod or Sabathia or Webb or any other player you want to mention.
Stop being so dense."
You're the dense one if you believe Hanson wouldn't be traded for the right player/package.
EVERYONE, with maybe the exception of Albert Pujols, is available for the right price.
Posted by: Kenan and Kel | November 19, 2008 at 01:21 PM
actually if you want to consider a fair trade maybe you start with 20% of the YES Network.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | November 19, 2008 at 01:21 PM
red sox trade for Halladay
Clay Buchholz
Lars Anderson
Michael Bowden
1 Double A prospet
my left testicle
Posted by: 04Forever | November 19, 2008 at 01:21 PM
I'm really surprised at how little respect Peavy gets while Halladay is now the second coming of Cy Young.
First, Halladay is 4 years older.
Second, Halladay is under control for 2 years, rather than 4-5 years for Peavy.
Third, look at the numbers.
During the past 5 years:
IP - Peavy=967, Halladay=965
Years ERA under 3 - Peavy=4, Halladay=2
They match up well in WHIP, Peavy is better with K/9, Halladay wins with better control.
Giving credit for pitching in the AL East compared to the NL West I think it's reasonable to say that the pitchers are very equal.
Posted by: bjsguess | November 19, 2008 at 01:22 PM
"realistic yankee trade for Halladay:
Phil Hughes
Austin Jackson
Andrew Brackman
Robinson Cano/Melky Cabrera
Ian Kennedy"
I would say Hughes, Cano, Montero and Betances undoubtedly gets it done.
That's a lot.
Posted by: Kenan and Kel | November 19, 2008 at 01:22 PM
Maybe another pitcher who isn't coming off TJ or just not very good (Brackman/Kennedy)
Posted by: Kenan and Kel | November 19, 2008 at 01:23 PM
"Giving credit for pitching in the AL East compared to the NL West I think it's reasonable to say that the pitchers are very equal."
How much credit are you giving?
I think in this case the difference in leagues contributes significantly to any disparity in stats.
Posted by: Kenan and Kel | November 19, 2008 at 01:24 PM
As a Dodger fan, I'd love to have CC....but I'd RATHER have Manny AND Roy.
Posted by: OedipusSC | November 19, 2008 at 01:24 PM
Hanson is untouchable for Peavy. I don't think anyone is untouchable for Halladay. Wasn't Salty untouchable? How about Craig Hansen? Adam Jones? You think if they offered Halladay for Hanson straight up that Hanson would be untouchable? Semantics. Negotiation strategy.
Posted by: daslied | November 19, 2008 at 01:25 PM
well, im not a yankee farm professional, im just saying that what i said is in more of the realm of reality thats all
Posted by: 04Forever | November 19, 2008 at 01:25 PM
phils:
You think that 2 years of Halladay (a 31 year pitcher, and Ace none-the-less) is worth Joba AND MORE? Joba is a 23 year old starter who promises to be the next Yankee Ace! And seriously if the Yankees didn't offer Hughes AND Kennedy for Santana, what makes you think that they would offer JOBA!?!
And I would understand if the Jays traded him out of division, but if the asking price is Joba high for him, then its just better to sit back, wait for the 2 years to be over and then offer him a 5 year contract at some ridiculous amount of $.
Posted by: aguirrem2 | November 19, 2008 at 01:26 PM
I wish there were a function that would block any proposed Yankees trades that involve some combination of Hughes, Jackson and Kennedy. Its tiring.
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | November 19, 2008 at 01:26 PM
Bjsquess, Peavy and Halladay are pretty equal in skills. But where Halladay is more attractive is the commitment - if he blows out his arm in May, which doesn't seem likely, he's gone in two years. If Peavy does the same, you're stuck with him for 4, plus that $20+ million option at the end.
Posted by: daslied | November 19, 2008 at 01:27 PM
Halladay also does a far better job of keeping the ball on the ground than Peavy does. For an equal trade package, I'd chose him without a second thought.
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | November 19, 2008 at 01:29 PM
Razor, i can understand that, but that wouldnt happen, an inter-division trade would never happen anyway, i dont know how we even got on this topic anyway, i just wanted to make a joke about my left testicle more then anything lol
Posted by: 04Forever | November 19, 2008 at 01:29 PM
"If Wren trades Hanson, that's it for him.."
There are still question marks surrounding Hanson.
His gb rate, he gives up the long ball, he is definitely a very very good prospect but he isn't untouchable.
Not saying Wren is going to trade him, but he most certainly would for the right offer. He isn't a sure thing.
Posted by: Kenan and Kel | November 19, 2008 at 01:30 PM
aguirrem2,
Yes i do. And when do the Yankees not keep a player under their control so don't make like its 2 years and then he's gonna bolt for more money with the Marlins.
Joba, while very good so far is a much more unproven commodity than Halladay. Also, and mark my words, he's out of position. He should be their 8th inning guy until Mariano retires and then take over the closer role. This coming year the hitters in the AL will adjust to him and his stats will come back to earth. I know you want him to be the second coming, but he's gotta prove it first. So yes you start there and go on from there.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | November 19, 2008 at 01:30 PM
04forever,
with the economy struggling, and the canadian/u.s. conversion rate, you left testicle is too small to offer.
Posted by: Boston Belongs To Me | November 19, 2008 at 01:31 PM
peavy and halladay are not pretty equal in skills. halladay is the best pitcher in baseball, pitching in the al east. peavy is very good in the NL west.
and yeah - 2 yrs of halladay is worth joba and more. get a grip. joba has yet to pitch more than 200 innings without getting hurt.
Posted by: the_kid_01 | November 19, 2008 at 01:32 PM
I dont think the Jays would trade him in the AL East to start.
how about Jose Reyes + ?? for Hallady and Mets sign Furcal for SS? thoughts Mets/Jays fans
Posted by: JayL78 | November 19, 2008 at 01:32 PM
daslied, if Halladay blows out an arm (12-18 months), you've traded your starting SS and best prospects for nothing. If Peavy does the same, you've still got 3 1/2 years of service from him (Mike Hampton is the only "3-year injury" I'm aware of).
Halladay is great, but I don't see the Braves offering nearly the same package for a 2-year commitment as they have for a 27-year-old under contract for 5 years.
I agree with the original premise, which is that the Dodgers have both the young talent to spare, and the future payroll flexibility (once Andruw and Schmidt are off the books) to replace or sign him in 2 years.
Just don't see the Braves as players in a Halladay sweepstakes.
Posted by: AtlantaMike | November 19, 2008 at 01:33 PM
K&K, if Wren isn't including Hanson in a deal for Peavy, he's not including Hanson for only 2 years of Halladay. But yeah, I guess we'll see when/if that right offer comes along....gonna have to be good though....
Posted by: drphonic7 | November 19, 2008 at 01:34 PM
actually my left testicle has good defense and bats 400 to left field, but sadly its under contract to me for the rest of my life, so....
Posted by: 04Forever | November 19, 2008 at 01:34 PM
I dont think the Jays would trade him in the AL East to start.
how about Jose Reyes + ?? for Hallady and Mets sign Furcal for SS? thoughts Mets/Jays fans
hold on I had to stop laughing for a minute . . . . No way.
Does the + include Wright?
Posted by: philsWSchamps | November 19, 2008 at 01:34 PM
Halladay is not going to be moved. J.P. Ricciardi is a wildly unpopular figure among most Jays fans & there is absolutely no way ownership would let him trade Roy Halladay.
That said, I think that any package would require a young, already established player (a Jose Reyes type guy) & then at least 2 more HIGH ceiling prospects & then you'd still have to add a bit more.
Posted by: deeselig | November 19, 2008 at 01:35 PM
"peavy and halladay are not pretty equal in skills."
I'll clarify - they're both really good and have both won a Cy Young.
Posted by: daslied | November 19, 2008 at 01:35 PM
"Joba, while very good so far is a much more unproven commodity than Halladay. Also, and mark my words, he's out of position."
Sure he may be prone to injury and has to "prove" himself.
But...
175 high leverage innings as a starter >>>>>>>>>>>>> 75 high leverage innings as a reliever.
He is more valuable in the rotation plus the Yanks have a decent bullpen. It isn't a bad idea to start him in the pen to save him for down the stretch but if he isn't starting eventually it's a waste of that talent.
Posted by: Kenan and Kel | November 19, 2008 at 01:36 PM
"K&K, if Wren isn't including Hanson in a deal for Peavy, he's not including Hanson for only 2 years of Halladay. But yeah, I guess we'll see when/if that right offer comes along....gonna have to be good though..."
All I'm saying is:
1. Hanson is still a prospect
2. He is not untouchable. That's just a negotiating ploy commonly used by GM's of every team in any sport.
Posted by: Kenan and Kel | November 19, 2008 at 01:38 PM
Let's not forget that Jake Peavy pitches in the best pitcher's park in the Majors and his stats reflect it:
Home - Career 2.77 ERA
Away - Career 3.80 ERA
Away from PETCO, Peavy is still an ace calibre pitcher, but to say he is at Halladay's level is absurd
Posted by: Acekicker123 | November 19, 2008 at 01:41 PM
2 for your last 2, K&K. Good stuff.
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | November 19, 2008 at 01:43 PM
Kenan and Kel,
yes their bullpen is decent but it could be lockdown like it was in the days of Mariano setting up for Wetteland and like the Phils was down the stretch with Madson and Lidge. Shortening the game will help them more in the long run and if they're going to spend 500 million on 4 new starting pitchers then all the better for them.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | November 19, 2008 at 01:43 PM
"garlick,
so you're saying, my half a pastrami sandwich for hanson deal has no shot?
it's got dijon...."
What's the bread situation looking like on that sandwich? If it's rye, it's pretty much a done deal...
Posted by: Dont Do That! | November 19, 2008 at 01:44 PM
Phils, that's just not true. Joba has shown that his stuff doesn't dramatically differ from the pen to the rotation so he's going to be far more valuable in 2x or 3x the innings pitched, regardless of leverage. Otherwise, your logic would dictate than any good SP should actually be used as a lights out reliever. We saw what happened with SP injuries last year; its far easier to backfill 30 innings in the pen than 15 starts in the rotation.
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | November 19, 2008 at 01:46 PM
""Kenan and Kel,
yes their bullpen is decent but it could be lockdown like it was in the days of Mariano setting up for Wetteland and like the Phils was down the stretch with Madson and Lidge. Shortening the game will help them more in the long run and if they're going to spend 500 million on 4 new starting pitchers then all the better for them."
Bullpens are incredibly volatile, Joba is a great arm who would add stability to the pen, but should be in the rotation.
Did anyone pencil in Madson as a shutdown 8th inning guy prior to 2008? The Yanks have enough arms, and enough money, to fill whatever void Joba's departure from the pen would create.
"
Posted by: Kenan and Kel | November 19, 2008 at 01:48 PM
Not to mention the Yankees are not guaranteed to land a single FA pitcher. Yes their the favorites for CC and will be after Lowe/Burnett etc but they still have two holes to fill and no one to fill them as of yet.
Posted by: Kenan and Kel | November 19, 2008 at 01:50 PM
Well, he wont be going to the Yankees, Red Sox, Rays or Orioles I assume.
But what about
Andy Sonnanstine/Edwin Jackson
Wade Davis
Reid Brignac
1 above average SP, 2 top prospects and maybe a project player like Mitch Talbot.
If they trade him to the AL East, would that be enough/too much?
The idea of the rotation makes me need new pants
1. Roy Halladay
2. Scott Kazmir
3. James Shields
4. Matt Garza
5. David Price
Shields as th 5th talented SP on the staff? Price as our #5?
My god, who would even need a offense?
Posted by: RaysFan | November 19, 2008 at 01:50 PM
"Mike Hampton is the only "3-year injury" I'm aware of"
Have you forgotten about Carl Pavano so soon?
Posted by: DodgersBruin | November 19, 2008 at 01:51 PM
Cincy Reds for Halladay.
Votto/ Bailey/ EE plus One.
Posted by: nyyankz | November 19, 2008 at 01:52 PM
Another reason to favor Halladay over Peavy: He pitches complete games, Jake doesn't.
Wren may take the untouchable tag off of Hanson if Halladay is available -- but only if the deal is for not more than three players, say Hanson, Gorkys and one other prospect (Flowers)?
I'd be shocked if Wren deals Hanson and Escobar in the same transaction, unless the Jays threw in McDonald.
Posted by: ink-stained scribe | November 19, 2008 at 01:53 PM
haha this is funy anyone who thinks halladay is going leave toronto they can go suck it
Posted by: Joe | November 19, 2008 at 01:53 PM
And McDonald ain't no Yunel.
Posted by: ink-stained scribe | November 19, 2008 at 01:54 PM
NJM,
i'm going to agree to disagree but will admit we're all working with a small sample size.
Joba as a reliever has a 1.53 ERA 20BB and 78K and a .185 BAA
while as a starter he has a 2.76 ERA 25BB, 74K and a .245 BAA.
I just think that over time as a starter he'll mirgrate (as teams see him more), to a 3-3.5 ERA and a .255 to .260 BAA which is still very good, but again my preference would be to lock down the final 3 innings of a game, especially from a Yankee perspective they could BUY CC, Lowe, Burnett whoever at this point.
Again just my opinion.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | November 19, 2008 at 01:54 PM
"What's the bread situation looking like on that sandwich? If it's rye, it's pretty much a done deal..."
if i say the bread is white, will ken rosenthal write an article calling me a racist?
Posted by: Boston Belongs To Me | November 19, 2008 at 01:55 PM
"Andy Sonnanstine/Edwin Jackson
Wade Davis
Reid Brignac"
Would you have any trouble giving up that package?
No, you would do it in a heartbeat
So that should answer your question
Posted by: Kenan and Kel | November 19, 2008 at 01:56 PM
Did anyone pencil in Madson as a shutdown 8th inning guy prior to 2008? The Yanks have enough arms, and enough money, to fill whatever void Joba's departure from the pen would create.
"
Not at all and in fact in 2007 he was bumped for a period of time from the 7th/8th to the 6th inning around the time of his injury, and yes relievers are extremely volatile so why not entrust it to someone you know, like JOBA will perform.
Of if you could prefer you could go the Mets route for the last 2 years and throw darts at a board.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | November 19, 2008 at 01:57 PM
"but again my preference would be to lock down the final 3 innings of a game,"
They have to be ahead through the first six though.
Posted by: Kenan and Kel | November 19, 2008 at 01:57 PM
appreciate the clarification.. but they're not both really good.
according to richard justice: In the past two seasons, Peavy has recorded just 16 outs after the seventh inning.
he's just very good. halladay is otherworldly. stop comparing them.
i wouldn't be surprised if ricciardi was "quietly shopping" halladay (though, why he'd leak it to a cut-rate jersey paper escapes me...) - he could re-stock his team for years to come. he's never worried about being popular.
Posted by: the_kid_01 | November 19, 2008 at 01:58 PM
Lets not talk about the Mets bullpen, I just ate...
Posted by: Kenan and Kel | November 19, 2008 at 01:59 PM
They have to be ahead through the first six though.
ya but with Manny, AROD, Teixeira, Jeter, Dimaggio they should be able to come back if down against anyone.
Whoops. Did i add a dead guy? Sorry I got carried away with my Yankees free agent shopping.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | November 19, 2008 at 02:01 PM
Disagree that Halladay is "going nowhere". Sure, he's likely not going to the AL East, but this is a good time to consider moving him. Toronto's rotation is going to be a mess with McGowan and Marcum out and Burnett presumably leaving. Moving Halladay now with 2 full years left (rather than 1.5 at the deadline or 1 next offseason) would allow them to maximize return in a Haren-esque deal.
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | November 19, 2008 at 02:02 PM