![]() |
|
|
| |
« Crisp-Ramirez Trade Reactions | Main | Latest On A.J. Burnett »
4:39pm: Tony Jackson of the L.A. Daily News shoots down all Dodgers rumors - no offer in the near future for Sabathia, no talks for Halladay, and no interest in Raul Ibanez.
I think Graziano's Halladay musings have been distorted a bit - he basically said the Blue Jays might explore the trade market at some point.
3:31pm: Graziano adds in a new post that the Giants plan to make a six-year offer in excess of $100MM but under $140MM. Tom Haudricourt had info about a Giants bid several hours earlier as well.
Haudricourt adds that the Angels will make a bid, but reports about the Dodgers may be inaccurate.
12:26pm: Dan Graziano of the Newark Star-Ledger explains why C.C. Sabathia is taking his time while mulling over the Yankees' six-year, $140MM offer. Graziano believes Sabathia and his agents are waiting to see what the Dodgers propose.
Graziano speaks of "rumblings today that the Dodgers either have offered or are about to offer Sabathia a six-year contract worth between $110 and $120 million." He believes this could compel the Yankees to increase their offer, just to ensure a ridiculous ($30MM+) gap between the two proposals.
Graziano has a source who continues to insist the Blue Jays will explore the market for ace Roy Halladay, who has two years and $30MM left on his deal. In that case, he believes the Dodgers are the most likely match. If the Dodgers acquire Halladay, they would focus on Manny Ramirez rather than Sabathia.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e201053603db8c970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Graziano's Latest: Sabathia, Halladay:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
"Please keep in mind one is in the NL the other the AL. I am not saying that Halladay doesnt have more stamina just saying its a lot easier to leave a pitcher in when he doesnt come up to the plate."
It's also a lot easier to pitch when that #9 batter is essentially an automatic out.
Posted by: Kenan and Kel | November 19, 2008 at 02:08 PM
"It's also a lot easier to pitch when that #9 batter is essentially an automatic out."
Cue the Gardner/Melky jokes.
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | November 19, 2008 at 02:13 PM
The kid, you're right - Peavy isn't really good. Thanks for setting me straight on my adverbs. :)
Posted by: daslied | November 19, 2008 at 02:13 PM
"Cue the Gardner/Melky jokes."
I can't
I don't beat on a guy when he's already down
cough .92 isop cough
Posted by: Kenan and Kel | November 19, 2008 at 02:21 PM
a ham & cheese sandwich walks into a bar.
the bartender says "sorry, we don't serve food here."
wait a minute, what were the jokes supposed to be about?
Posted by: Boston Belongs To Me | November 19, 2008 at 02:50 PM
What's brown and sticky?
A stick.
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | November 19, 2008 at 03:10 PM
HAHA This has been a funny read.
1. Jake Peavy can't even hold Roy Halladay's jockstrap. It's no contest. Look at Doc's complete games, look where he pitches, look at the division he is in, look at the DH hitters he must face.
2. We have heard the hype around Hughes, Kennedy, and Joba, nothing is a given for this Hanson kid who is thoroughly over hyped and if it came down to Halladay to the Braves, they would have to include him. As for Peavy, he isn't the pitcher Halladay is, so I can understand why they wouldn't include him.
Posted by: jaysfan99 | November 19, 2008 at 03:12 PM
I thought you got kicked out of here. Again.
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | November 19, 2008 at 03:23 PM
"Good one, bro. Good one.
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | November 19, 2008 at 01:20 PM"
Thanks, "bro." Thanks
Posted by: cfitz88 | November 19, 2008 at 03:28 PM
You wouldn't want a diluted bro, would you?
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | November 19, 2008 at 03:31 PM
DELUDED
Posted by: Kenan and Kel | November 19, 2008 at 03:33 PM
bro
Posted by: Kenan and Kel | November 19, 2008 at 03:33 PM
(I know. See well above.)
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | November 19, 2008 at 03:38 PM
(Bro.)
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | November 19, 2008 at 03:39 PM
Halladay >>> Peavy. Not even close.
LOL @ the Giants. Cy Young winning lefties with connections to the Bay Area. Cy Young winning lefties with connections to the Bay Area.
Posted by: melonis rex | November 19, 2008 at 03:40 PM
Well, at least most people, sane people, here agree that Halladay more likely than not, isn't going anywhere this off-season. Granted I think we can all agree he'll definitely be on the market over the course of this season and well into next off-season.
My wondering, as a Dodger fan, is what the Blue Jays would require as the centerpiece for a Halladay deal. Would it be Kershaw? Or would it be Billingsley or Kemp? The Blue Jays needs center on primarily three things: SS, bullpen help (not necessarily a closer), and some good starters.
With the trades from last year, the Dodgers have minimal top-tier prospects in the wings that are tradable. Most of our young guys are on the major league squad making an impact. I would imagine any deal with the Blue Jays would assuredly include Chin Lung Hu (SS prospect), Delwyn Young, and maybe an outfielder mid-level, like Xavier Paul or Andrew Lambo. Now, the centerpiece would either be one of these three: James McDonald, Clayton Kershaw, or Chad Billingsley. I'd actually be more comfortable trading Bilingsley than Kershaw in a Halladay trade. But, I'm not so sure Colletti would be able to convince Logan to part with Billingsley.
I dunno, what are your thoughts?
Posted by: MrBlake14 | November 19, 2008 at 03:41 PM
Bro,
how about Igawa/Kennedy/Gardner for Halladay/Wells, bro?
I think most people would agree Kennedy could be awesome for a smaller market team, Igawa is full of potential, and Gardner is a solid CF of the future, bro!
Posted by: cfitz88 | November 19, 2008 at 03:44 PM
As a Dodgers fan, is that a commentary on your love for Kershaw or something you don't like about Billingsley? Because from afar, I have a massive Billingsley crush.
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | November 19, 2008 at 03:45 PM
"Bro,
how about Igawa/Kennedy/Gardner for Halladay/Wells, bro?
I think most people would agree Kennedy could be awesome for a smaller market team, Igawa is full of potential, and Gardner is a solid CF of the future, bro!"
Bro,
Sign me up, but maybe see if we can get Toronto to reacquire Eckstein to send to use and replace Cano at 2B. Grit over talent!
Your bro,
NJM
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | November 19, 2008 at 03:47 PM
("Send to use"! OMG!! I meant us!!!)
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | November 19, 2008 at 03:47 PM
I wouldn't be comfortable trading either Bills or Kershaw. I, too, have a "crush" on Bills, but I guess long term it'd make more sense to trade him over Kershaw. But if they are going for it all right now, they can't lose Bills.
Posted by: cheba63 | November 19, 2008 at 03:50 PM
If i ever need a good laugh i'll come back to report. Thanks all.
Did he really say that Igawa was "filler"?
The only filler he belongs in is in a "sammich", but that's some expensive filler.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | November 19, 2008 at 03:53 PM
That would be hilarious if the Giants signed CC. For multiple reasons but especially if the contract was for less then what the Yanks offered.
Posted by: kdub | November 19, 2008 at 03:54 PM
Oh it isn't that I "like" Kershaw better than Bills, its just that Billingsley would make more sense to trade. Billingsley has great stuff no doubt, but I have always had this big fear in the back of my mind he could have a serious shoulder or back injury. He doesn't have what you would call a nice, easy, fluid delivery. Though it isn't nearly as acrobatic as Lincecum's, he still has what many scouts consider a high-effort delivery.
I'm looking it it this way, Halladay is an upgrade over Bills no doubt, and is under contract for two years and, as he always has, the Doc will fly under the radar and probably would be open for a reasonable contract extension. Plus, adding Billingsley means we would have to offer much less. Instead of Kershaw + another high-level prospect (or major-league ready young player), plus the other mid-level guys, a Billingsley trade could be Bills + three or four mid-level prospects.
Posted by: MrBlake14 | November 19, 2008 at 03:57 PM
"The Blue Jays needs center on primarily three things: SS, bullpen help (not necessarily a closer), and some good starters. "
That is kind of uninformed information. The Blue Jays had the best Bullpen in the entire League last year and have amazing depth there. Shortstop I can agree on, and at least 1 top notch potential starter is a must.
As a jays fan what would be on my list is a 3rd Base Prospect to replace Rolen.
Also lets be realistic about how/when Halladay would be delt. The only way it will happen is at the trade deadline if the Jays are really out of it.
Posted by: Dev0 | November 19, 2008 at 03:59 PM
"Grit over talent!"
Agreed, you're diluted if you don't believe that when it comes to on the field performance nothing is more valuable than intangibles.
Posted by: Kenan and Kel | November 19, 2008 at 04:00 PM
"Disagree that Halladay is "going nowhere". Sure, he's likely not going to the AL East, but this is a good time to consider moving him. Toronto's rotation is going to be a mess with McGowan and Marcum out and Burnett presumably leaving."
A mess? McGowan stunk last year, and Burnett had the worst year of his Jay career, the only difference was that he was healthy this year. While the loss of Marcum is big, it can easily be offset by gains made by first round pitching prospects David Purcey, Ricky Romero, and Brett Cecil. The Jays had the #1 staff ERA last year, and people need to start realizing it's because they had a TOP (1-3 in the AL) defender at basically every single position (except LF). This is what makes someone like Jesse Litsch look so spectacular, and it is what is going to keep the Jays pitching looking good this year, despite losses of 3 "name" pitchers.
As for Halladay being traded, I always get a good laugh when conversations like these come up. Most of you are nowhere near the type of package it would take to get Halladay - he is the best pitcher in baseball, period. The only person who can make a case over the last 5 years of being in his league is Santana. If I were trying to acquire Halladay using the Jays own system (the system I know best), it would take a minimum of their 3 best prospects - Snider Cecil and Cooper, and Ahrens or Jackson would probably need to be included as well.
The only way Doc is going to get traded is if JP decided 2009 is a lost cause and he trades Ryan and Overbay as well. Otherwise there is simply no way they are going to trade their #1 starter and still have a payroll in the 80m range. It just makes no sense.
Posted by: 92-93 | November 19, 2008 at 04:01 PM
"" I'd actually be more comfortable trading Bilingsley than Kershaw in a Halladay trade. But, I'm not so sure Colletti would be able to convince Logan to part with Billingsley.
I think you have to hold onto Kershaw.
Talk about a limitless ceiling
Posted by: Kenan and Kel | November 19, 2008 at 04:01 PM
Funny how the Giants are going to offer 6 years, but not one mention of CC's weight, his arm falling off, his back going out..etc.
I guess like everything else, moves are only bad when the Yanks make them.
Posted by: yankeegirl49 | November 19, 2008 at 04:04 PM
The Jays had the best bull pen in baseball.
What they need is help at SS/1B/3B/SP.
Chin Lung Hu would be of interest at SS.
They would also want one of Bills/Kershaw.
Posted by: jaysfan99 | November 19, 2008 at 04:07 PM
Haha, finally a day where there are some Dodgers rumors. Too bad Tony Jackson basically shot them all down.
http://www.insidesocal.com/dodgers/
Posted by: cheba63 | November 19, 2008 at 04:10 PM
"Funny how the Giants are going to offer 6 years, but not one mention of CC's weight, his arm falling off, his back going out..etc.
I guess like everything else, moves are only bad when the Yanks make them."
oooo. good one.
Posted by: GeneralManager | November 19, 2008 at 04:11 PM
Ok Phils - focus - how does Philly get Halladay.
They need a SS.
Donald.
A Catcher.
Marson.
SPs.
Carrasco AND Kendrick or Happ -aw heck say both.
Joe Savery
So - Marson/Carrasco/Donald/Kendrick/Happ
If they wanted to flip flop Victorino for Wells as part of it (to reduce salary) We could add an extra prospect and make it:
Phils get:
P Halladay
LF/CF Wells
Jays get:
CF Victorino
C Marson
SS/3B Donald
P Carrasco
P Savery
P Kendrick
P Happ or Edgar Garcia
Would you keep Jason Donald for SS and move J-Roll if we could Vic and some of the 2nd tier prospects???
Posted by: steveh | November 19, 2008 at 04:19 PM
Cubs..if you think the Yanks are going into a new stadium after missing the playoffs for the first time in years with THAT rotation, you know NOTHING about the New York Yankees.
Posted by: yankeegirl49 | November 19, 2008 at 04:31 PM
I think the only way hanson is traded is if he is signed to an extension by the Braves.
Also even if hanson isn't included there are plenty other prospects the braves have that can equal his value.
The package I posted earlier was based off what others said were the main needs of the Jays.
Anyone with knowledge know what they need?
Posted by: drumzalicious | November 19, 2008 at 04:34 PM
The braves could be able to aquire halladay easier than peavy. Jus give them Gorsky hernandez, gregor blanco and kelly johnson and 2 more prospects for Alex Rios or Vernon Wells and Roy Halladay
Posted by: tmac2 | November 19, 2008 at 04:39 PM
"you know NOTHING about the New York Yankees"
I think most people understand the Yankees are the worst run team in major league sports. They have spent well in excess of $650 million dollars in three years and have won a total of two - count them - two playoff games. Sabbathia should sign with the Yankees. After two years, this weighting (pun intended) to happen injury will turn into their next Carl Pavano.
Posted by: Iron Nat | November 19, 2008 at 04:44 PM
"Jus give them Gorsky hernandez, gregor blanco and kelly johnson and 2 more prospects for Alex Rios or Vernon Wells and Roy Halladay"
Yes just give them that
Posted by: Kenan and Kel | November 19, 2008 at 04:46 PM
"The braves could be able to aquire halladay easier than peavy. Jus give them Gorsky hernandez, gregor blanco and kelly johnson and 2 more prospects for Alex Rios or Vernon Wells and Roy Halladay"
I agree with this post 100%. Although I think the Braves might be giving up too much. Toronto would have to include Marcum and BJ Ryan as well. McGowan too.
Posted by: Land-Man | November 19, 2008 at 04:47 PM
The worst run team...LMAO! They have the most titles of any team and the most revenue. Two goals in owning and running a sports team...make money and win. The Yanks have done both better than any other team.
This place is so comical.
Posted by: yankeegirl49 | November 19, 2008 at 04:50 PM
It's not hard to contend when you outspend other teams by $150 million every year.
Posted by: Land-Man | November 19, 2008 at 04:53 PM
Ummm, Braves aren't getting both Halladay and Rios/Wells..they probably aren't getting any of them, but for dreaming's sake, let's say it's possible. That's a mega deal, and mega deals aren't in the plan for the Braves. Sure, they have the players to get it done, but it would be very much contrary to everything they're obviously trying to do, and that is build for the future.
Posted by: Apollo'08 | November 19, 2008 at 04:54 PM
You're right Land_Man which is why I hope they outspend the other teams by $250 million this year.
Posted by: yankeegirl49 | November 19, 2008 at 04:55 PM
Neither their past history or their profitability have anything to do with the fact they are poorly run. $650 million and two playoff wins in three years is pathetic. What is comical is listening to Yankee fans crow over their past and profitability while they ignore their current woefulness. Please spend, spend, spend on the Pavanos and Sabbathias and save the rest of baseball from looking foolish.
Posted by: Iron Nat | November 19, 2008 at 04:57 PM
"You're right Land_Man which is why I hope they outspend the other teams by $250 million this year."
Me too yankeegirl...and then lose again. lol
Posted by: tmacntn | November 19, 2008 at 05:01 PM
"You're right Land_Man which is why I hope they outspend the other teams by $250 million this year."
Me to yankeegirl. Then also see them not make the playoffs again haha!
Posted by: tmacntn | November 19, 2008 at 05:04 PM
To be fair, the AL east is a difficult division and the Yankees did have a decent/good record. I'm not a Yankee fan by any means, but they are a good team. And the more money you spend, the bigger the mistakes you make will be, and ever team makes mistakes. Theirs are just a lot more expensive mistakes than say the Royals.
Posted by: Apollo'08 | November 19, 2008 at 05:04 PM
Wow, what happened...is this groundhog day?
Posted by: Apollo'08 | November 19, 2008 at 05:11 PM
Okay, this website is screwed up. Love ya Tim, but something's not cool about this format.
Posted by: Apollo'08 | November 19, 2008 at 05:12 PM
"Jus give them Gorsky hernandez, gregor blanco and kelly johnson and 2 more prospects for Alex Rios or Vernon Wells and Roy Halladay"
Yes just give them that
I think I may have preferred the Yankee fan that didn't want to give up Brett Gardner.
Better yet, I'll trade them Adam Eaton and the rights to Steve Jeltz and Mickey Morandini. that should do it right? They said they needed a shortstop right? And Jeltz can't be more than 50 years old now, right?
Posted by: philsWSchamps | November 19, 2008 at 05:15 PM
R. Halladay might go yanks 09
Trade
1. P. Hughes
2. R. Cano
3. M. Cabrera
4. D. Betances
5. increased contract
z
Posted by: arod13 | November 19, 2008 at 05:31 PM
philsWSchamps , you may have to include Darren Daulton to get it done for Halladay. I would do Morandini for Peavy straight up.
Posted by: Land-Man | November 19, 2008 at 05:34 PM
philsWSchamps , you may have to include Darren Daulton to get it done for Halladay. I would do Morandini for Peavy straight up.
I would Land-Man, but you can't trade players that are currently in another dimension. Its a little known rule in MLB.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | November 19, 2008 at 05:59 PM
Land-Man,
I would, but its a little known rule in the MLB rule book. Section 143, Article 32A Page 14 subsection 24.58 that you "cannot trade a player within 48 hours of him leaving or returning from another dimension".
Those crazy MLB rules.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | November 19, 2008 at 06:03 PM
I am a Yankee fan and I'll give Toronto whatever they wanted for Halladay.
Posted by: kwhitey | November 19, 2008 at 06:29 PM
Anyone with knowledge know what they need?
Posted by: drumzalicious | November 19, 2008 at 04:34 PM
---
I can tell you what we don't need. We don't know one or two good prospects, and 4 pieces of garbage fillers.
Posted by: juiced | November 19, 2008 at 06:35 PM
Anyone with knowledge know what they need?
Posted by: drumzalicious | November 19, 2008 at 04:34
I can tell you what we don't need. We don't know one or two good prospects, and 4 pieces of garbage fillers.
Posted by: juiced | November 19, 2008 at 06:35 PM
Escobar - SS
Flowers - DH Type
Melden - Bullpen
Boyer - Bullpen
Roghbrough/Locke - Starter
Morton/Reyes - Starter
So from that your calling Flowers who is dominating with the bat wherever he goes, Melden who is one of our top RP prospects, Boyer who is an established MLB lever RP, Roghbrough who is probably the second best pitcher in our system behind Hanson. all of those guys are fillers?
i can see morton/reyes being a filler but the rest are def not fillers
Posted by: drumzalicious | November 19, 2008 at 08:02 PM
The fact that the Giants are in it for CC is good on two levels:
1. They obviously then would have one of the best rotations in baseball
2. They would be able to trade sanchez or MAYBE Cain for an impact bat
Posted by: Leland11 | November 19, 2008 at 08:53 PM
"So from that your calling Flowers who is dominating with the bat wherever he goes, Melden who is one of our top RP prospects, Boyer who is an established MLB lever RP, Roghbrough who is probably the second best pitcher in our system behind Hanson. all of those guys are fillers?"
Yes, that's exactly what they are. Boyer and Morton wouldn't make the Jays staff and Rohrbaugh has very underwhelming minor league numbers. So no, Yunel Escobar and Tyler Flowers WILL NOT get you Roy Halladay.
Here's an exercise for all fans. If you are even thinking about getting Halladay, realize that it is going to cost your organization's top 3 prospects. Coming up with these packages without that is futile, they will never be considered.
For example, let's use the Yankees - Chamberlain, Hughes, and Cano would be a starting point, and I'm certain that even that isn't enough of a framework to get JP to move Halladay (because Cano isn't a good enough position player). A suitable package for Halladay would be one built around Longoria and Price before the 2008 season. Think about that before coming up with these half-assed proposals.
Posted by: 92-93 | November 19, 2008 at 09:16 PM
You honestly think a package of
Tommy Hanson, Jason Heyward, Jordan Shafer/Gorkys Hernandez, AND a player like Yunel Escobar?
Not to mention the addition of pitching!?!?!?!?
Rediculous. i dont see any team making a deal like that for 2 years of one player. i'll just wait 2 years for Hanson to come up
Posted by: drumzalicious | November 19, 2008 at 09:56 PM
"i'll just wait 2 years for Hanson to come up"
Ask arrogant Yankees fans how that worked out for them this year, not giving up Hughes and some pieces for Johan.
Nobody is demanding that package for Halladay. All I'm saying is don't come forward with a package that leaves out your 3 best prospects - it's just not going to happen.
Posted by: 92-93 | November 19, 2008 at 11:30 PM
Ask arrogant Yankees fans how that worked out for them this year, not giving up Hughes and some pieces for Johan.
Nobody is demanding that package for Halladay. All I'm saying is don't come forward with a package that leaves out your 3 best prospects - it's just not going to happen.
Posted by: 92-93 | November 19, 2008 at 11:30 PM "
Well the package i listed was based off of what written that they needed which was
SS
DH
RP
From that listing I put our top RP prospect in Melden, or best hitting prospect in Flowers, then our MLB shortstop whom is one of the top in the league and under control for a few more years.
Boyer was an addition as he was a solid RP with ML experience. Roghbrough/Locke are our #2 and #3 SP prospects with Hanson being our #1.
Do you have a more comprehensive list as to what they need
Posted by: drumzalicious | November 20, 2008 at 08:39 AM