![]() |
|
|
| |
« Blue Jays To Meet With Pavano's Agent | Main | Braves Interested In Ankiel, Hart, Hermida »
11:12pm: Clarification of the earlier Colletti stuff from Tony Jackson: "What Colletti actually said was that Sabathia had made the Dodgers aware, not directly but through conversations with third parties, that he had a desire to pitch for them."
10:38pm: Heyman says the Red Sox talked parameters with Sabathia and "perhaps even" made an offer. They're not expected to beat the Yankees' offer though.
Jeff Passan offers his take on the Brewers' angle.
9:26pm: Rosenthal's source says the Red Sox were just doing their due diligence in meeting with Sabathia. The Sox are focused on Mark Teixeira.
9:19pm: The Giants say it's "debatable" as to whether they'll meet with Sabathia. Andrew Baggarly indicates Brian Sabean implied they don't plan to make a competitive offer to Sabathia.
9:14pm: Brewers assistant GM Gord Ash says Sabathia is not concerned about the makeup of the Brewers' roster. Doug Melvin does not believe they'd need to be too creative with a contract.
7:26pm: Dan Graziano says Sabathia requested both Yankees meetings, the second of which took place at the pitcher's room at the Wynn. Sabathia's left Vegas, and didn't give the Yanks a timetable.
7:17pm: Bill Shaikin talked to a Giants official who says they're "definitively" not interested in Manny Ramirez. They are, however, interested in Sabathia.
Abraham notes that Sabathia requested that second meet with the Yanks.
6:19pm: Peter Abraham learned from Brian Cashman that the Yanks met with Sabathia again today.
5:41pm: Sabathia's meeting with Yankees officials lasted 2.5 hours yesterday, as he gathered information on the team and the city. He told the Yankees he's not delaying his decision due to a desire to pitch elsewhere; he just wants to gather the facts.
4:32pm: Sabathia apparently told Colletti he wants to be a Dodger? Speaking to reporters, Colletti left it as a "possibility" the Dodgers could get involved.
4:12pm: Doug Melvin deems the opt-out and sixth year chatter "speculation" (despite the reports below and another from Phil Rogers). But after meeting with Sabathia's agents today, Melvin says the Brewers are still in it. They'll meet again later in the week.
Also, there's an article making the rounds where Bill Madden quotes an industry source as saying Greg Genske is "dead as an agent" if Sabathia ends up signing for $120MM.
12:03pm: Joel Sherman says Brian Cashman brought Joe Girardi and Reggie Jackson along for their recent meeting with Sabathia. Privately, the Yanks feel that Sabathia would be entirely invested in New York if he signs with them (despite his West Coast leanings).
11:49am: Jon Heyman has a Brewers update. He says they're open to adding a sixth year, bringing the total to $120MM (closer to $110MM with deferred money). He also heard an opt-out clause could be added after two years. Heyman says Sabathia hated having Spring Training in Florida, a slight mark against the Yankees.
10:30am: Dan Graziano was told yesterday that the Brewers added a sixth year to their Sabathia offer, but he admits there are conflicting reports on that.
9:33am: Buster Olney says to take it for what it's worth, but his source says the meeting between Sabathia and the Yankees went "great."
8:44am: According to George King of the New York Post, the Brewers could offer C.C. Sabathia an opt-out clause after three seasons to entice him to sign (similar to the Blue Jays' deal for A.J. Burnett). At this time, only the Brewers and Yankees have offers on the table for Sabathia. King talked to a source who said in regard to the Giants, "It would have to be a total default position in terms of years and dollars." Perhaps that indicates the Giants can't really go beyond the Brewers' five-year, $100MM offer.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e2010536454d99970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference C.C. Sabathia Rumors: Monday:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
The Giants should be trying to look into Texieria, Manny Rameriz and Adam Dunn, not Sabathia. IMO
Posted by: Steven | December 08, 2008 at 08:46 AM
A 3 year buyout option likely has little appeal given the injury risk that accompanies CC's body type.
Posted by: Rich | December 08, 2008 at 08:50 AM
hey tim,
Wasn't that how the Jays got AJ to sign in Toronto well part of it with that Opt-Out Clause?
Posted by: Larsen101 | December 08, 2008 at 08:50 AM
^^ Yeah, Tim put that in up above.
Posted by: studio179 | December 08, 2008 at 09:00 AM
Did Burnett have an offer on the table that had a significantly higher AAV than the one he signed with Toronto? If not the comparison is inapt.
Posted by: Rich | December 08, 2008 at 09:10 AM
Giants should offer 5yrs 90-100 mill.
He won't accept, but at least they could say they tried and called his bluff about wanting to play for the Giants. Business or not, if you want to play at home and still are offered more money than you could ever spend in a lifetime, then well....
Posted by: 55saveslives | December 08, 2008 at 09:10 AM
how much is sabean regretting that zito contract now...they could easily have sabathia-lincecum-cain-sanchez at the same payroll they have now. without making any upgrades to the offense, that team is a playoff contender already.
sad. sabean really screwed it up.
Posted by: frits | December 08, 2008 at 09:25 AM
You guys most likely already read this, but if not, its a pretty good article that makes a case for why the Giants should make a realistic offer to CC even though they desperately need power hitting.
http://www.sportsline.com/mlb/story/11152652
I think the Giants should try to beat out the Brewers and grab CC for "cheap". Pitching > hitting always.
Posted by: Dave8603 | December 08, 2008 at 09:27 AM
"A 3 year buyout option likely has little appeal given the injury risk that accompanies CC's body type."
It's the small guys that are the injury risks, not the big guys.
The only injury concern with CC is the high inning counts the past two years, but the big body means he's more likely to handle it well.
Long term though, the concern is CC's conditioning. But I don't think an athlete can handle his body worse than David Wells did, and he still managed to pitch into his 40's.
Posted by: yanksfan | December 08, 2008 at 09:36 AM
OMFG IF BUSTER IS RIGHT MAYBE WE GET SABATHIA TODAY!!!!!!!
(But seriously, I'd be all caps happy if he did sign soon.)
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | December 08, 2008 at 09:37 AM
Just sign already CC so the rest of the market can be set.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | December 08, 2008 at 09:48 AM
You read that Yankee haters in went "GREAT"
Posted by: DominicanYanks | December 08, 2008 at 09:51 AM
Did people forget about a guy name D. Wells? CC looks like a model in fron of him.
Posted by: DominicanYanks | December 08, 2008 at 09:53 AM
"It's the small guys that are the injury risks, not the big guys."
David Wells. Bartolo Colon. Both extreme body types come with increased injury risks.
Posted by: melonis rex | December 08, 2008 at 09:56 AM
Wells only missed significant time in one year from age 27 through 37. If Sabathia follows that model, color me thrilled.
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | December 08, 2008 at 10:03 AM
(Actually, scratch that, 1994 was the strike year)
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | December 08, 2008 at 10:04 AM
just. get. this. done!
Posted by: TheKiid | December 08, 2008 at 10:07 AM
"Wells only missed significant time in one year from age 27 through 37."
And it was because he had gout. lol!
Posted by: docgonzo | December 08, 2008 at 10:18 AM
Yankees need to move on from C.C.
Sign Sheets or Burnett, re-sign Pettitte, sign Tex or Manny.
Posted by: Cyrus | December 08, 2008 at 10:22 AM
If someone offered me $140MM then I would think that the meeting would go well as well =)
Posted by: KG2577 | December 08, 2008 at 10:22 AM
the thing is guys...david wells and bartolo colon are famous for not having a work ethic
CC sabathia has a great work ethic...hes just heavy
bartolo colon doesnt do much in the offseason to keep in shape
david wells often said himself that he barely did anything to prepare for a season and never worked out
CC works out all the time..and being in shape is different for a pitcher than a position player
Posted by: hawkeyes12990 | December 08, 2008 at 10:25 AM
"Did Burnett have an offer on the table that had a significantly higher AAV than the one he signed with Toronto? If not the comparison is inapt."
One reason the Brewers are likely offering that as an incentive to tell CC that if he does not like the way the team's direction is going in 3 years he can opt out. Why? It has been reported the Brewers might have to trade Fielder if they signed CC. They will most likely will trade Fielder down the road anyway. I'm sure Sabathia wants assurances the team will try and contend.
Posted by: studio179 | December 08, 2008 at 10:27 AM
And, to reiterate, Wells is a terrible example if you're trying to imply that Sabathia is going to breakdown.
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | December 08, 2008 at 10:28 AM
People really need to get over this whole CC is an injury risk garbage. He is a big powere pitcher with a smooth, repeatable delivery. he was not overworked at all by Cleveland during the years that can typically hurt a pitcher. he threw a boatload of innings this year, but he kept his velocity and his mechanics were still good. The best thing the Brewers did for CC was not advance.
There is no more health risk with CC than any other healthy veteran pitcher. A 6 year deal is his age 29-34 seasons. He should be wildly productive for that time period and maybe even a couple of years beyond this.
Posted by: CMM | December 08, 2008 at 10:30 AM
I mention D. Well because he also was "out of shape" and was huge in big games with the Yanks. I don't think they Yanks should sign Manny. Tex is the guy, a few year ago they missed on Beltran and look now. Tex plays gold glove 1B and that is what they need. Besides the bat, he brings a really good glove, Manny brings a big bat and huge drama and no defense. Tex is now and furure, Manny is just now.
Posted by: DominicanYanks | December 08, 2008 at 10:35 AM
CC should like Milwaukee over NY because Milwaukee has better food by far. (Brats, Miller Beer just a few miles from the park, and Chicago-style Pizza just an hour away)
Posted by: OmegaMan | December 08, 2008 at 10:41 AM
You read that Yankee haters in went "GREAT"
alright there my Dominican friend RELAX.
Who is the source from CC's camp or the Yankees. I would trust it more if it was from CC's camp. That being said I think the Yankees end up with him because of sheer dollars, no other reason.
oh and if you're wondering WHY there are so many Yankees haters out there check out post seven below yours. You're not shopping at Macy's people, its free agency. I'll take one of these, two of those and one of these" is how the Yankees are perceived.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | December 08, 2008 at 10:41 AM
Dominican: He certainly wasn't huge in 2003 against Florida. I still want to kick him for Game 5.
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | December 08, 2008 at 10:42 AM
I am very surprised that the Yankees have interest in Sheets. Sheets seems like a total national league pitcher country boy to me...
Posted by: KG2577 | December 08, 2008 at 10:50 AM
Not Joe Morgan yeah, but is one game out of how many.
I will be honest, I'm a Yankee fan and I have seen some really stupid yankees trade proposal, that I myself say, No wonder people hate us. But not all Yankee fans are like that.
Posted by: DominicanYanks | December 08, 2008 at 11:00 AM
Sheets is an excellent pitcher. he misses bats, has good control and keeps the ball in the park. The downside is he has trouble staying healthy. A healthy Sheets would do fine in the AL.
I like him becasue I think he'll be chaeper and on a shorter deal than AJ and frankly, I look at Sheets/Joba/Hughes as 450-480 innings total of pretty good pitching. 3 people for 2 slots keeps Job and Hughes in-line with their IP and assumes Sheets will miss some time here or there with a minor injury.
It's not like I am the GM (although that would rock), it is just how I would look at Sheets for the Yankees' perspective going into 2009.
Posted by: CMM | December 08, 2008 at 11:02 AM
I will be honest, I'm a Yankee fan and I have seen some really stupid yankees trade proposal, that I myself say, No wonder people hate us. But not all Yankee fans are like that.
Dominican,
agreed. We all have dumb fans. Heck even some Mets fans disagree with what i say sometimes, imagine that. The difference is you have more total fans than anyone so it just seems worse for you.
I still love the guy that wouldn't include Brett Gardner in any discussions for Roy Halladay. That was a classic!
Posted by: philsWSchamps | December 08, 2008 at 11:33 AM
Sure, but he was willing to put Igawa in that deal so it wasn't all bad, right?
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | December 08, 2008 at 11:52 AM
Dumb fans...they are everywhere. Cub fan here. I think we are near the top with A) Fans who don't think or B) 12-14 yr. olds posting. Everyone has ideas that may or may no agree with others, but some of the same people post silliness. You learn who is a baseball fan, even though you might not agree with everything they say. You also learn who to ignore.
Posted by: studio179 | December 08, 2008 at 11:54 AM
"Sure, but he was willing to put Igawa in that deal so it wasn't all bad, right?"
Right.
Posted by: Kenan and Kel | December 08, 2008 at 12:08 PM
"Brian Cashman brought Joe Girardi and Reggie Jackson along for their recent meeting with Sabathia. "
did they also bring a uniform for him to try on?
Posted by: GeneralManager | December 08, 2008 at 12:12 PM
we all have our biases, i agree. and that is perfectly fine; human nature to be emotionally invested in a team.
that being said, it is also human nature to take 140million versus 110 over the same period of time. do you guys think he prefers the NL to such a degree to leave 30 million on the table?
and with the case of pitching in/near the bay area, how many days during the 6 month season would he be able to live at home, anyways? assuming SF is really a contender here, 50 nights in his hometown bed? LAA; long commute? it seems like a stretch by the media to me.
Posted by: ArodMVP217 | December 08, 2008 at 12:14 PM
He looks like its leaning to the Yanks right now. Another reason to sign CC is that future FA pitchers won't be as good.
Posted by: DominicanYanks | December 08, 2008 at 12:24 PM
"that being said, it is also human nature to take 140million versus 110 over the same period of time. do you guys think he prefers the NL to such a degree to leave 30 million on the table?"
I get what you're saying, but I don't really agree. Lets lower the money to our levels: I know I certainly wouldn't take $140K to work somewhere in Alabama versus $110K to work closer to family/friends on the east coast. That's the one reason I won't be annoyed at anyone if Sabathia decides to head out West. Yanks are doing everything *in their control* to get their guy, if it doesn't work out, it doesn't work out.
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | December 08, 2008 at 12:44 PM
"that being said, it is also human nature to take 140million versus 110 over the same period of time. do you guys think he prefers the NL to such a degree to leave 30 million on the table?"
It comes down to the player as a person and what he and the family think is best. Oh, and 30 million is a lot to leave.
Posted by: studio179 | December 08, 2008 at 12:47 PM
NJM,
I see what you are saying, too. However, going on your assesment, 30k does not mean much of a difference in lifestyle. 30 million means a great deal of a difference of lifestyle. That does not mean CC takes the money. It depends on what he feels is best. I don't know the man. But that comparison is not the same. I see what you are trying to say in family values.
Posted by: studio179 | December 08, 2008 at 12:51 PM
$30MM means a lot in general terms, but does it really mean that much when its on top of $110MM? What would Sabathia have to go without if he accepts "only" $110MM over 6 years that the extra $30MM could get him? A guy pulling down a guaranteed $110MM (on top of past earnings and future earnings after this contract) will far more likely than not never be able to think of something he wants and not be able to get except ... and you know whats coming here ... things beyond money.
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | December 08, 2008 at 01:25 PM
You gotta respect CC for taking his time to make the right decision for him and his family. Most players would jump on the bills but he wants to get the right deal. And it makes sense cause the guy gives it everything he's got and will be doing so for the next six years.
Posted by: Chipotle | December 08, 2008 at 04:21 PM
Somebody missed this one on CC... http://hotstove.mlblogs.com/archives/2008/12/sabathia_a_possibility_for_col.html
Reportedly, he wants to be a Dodger.
Take it for what it's worth. It came from MLB.com.
Posted by: dodgrdog88 | December 08, 2008 at 04:23 PM
"$30MM means a lot in general terms, but does it really mean that much when its on top of $110MM? What would Sabathia have to go without if he accepts "only" $110MM over 6 years that the extra $30MM could get him? A guy pulling down a guaranteed $110MM (on top of past earnings and future earnings after this contract)" How about setting your kids, grand kids, great grand kids etc up with enough money that they can do whatever they want in life and be able to live comfortably.
Posted by: hollaforskolla | December 08, 2008 at 04:23 PM
"It has been reported the Brewers might have to trade Fielder if they signed CC."
Of course they'd have to trade Prince. No one else would be able to get close to the post-game spread. Very bad for clubhouse chemistry.
Posted by: mac_1103 | December 08, 2008 at 04:23 PM
"Also, there's an article making the rounds where Bill Madden quotes an industry source as saying Greg Genske is "dead as an agent" if Sabathia ends up signing for $120MM."
This quote is what's wrong with baseball.
Yeah cause CC has no choice in where he chooses to play. Now I know Man Ram is going to the highest bidder cause he's admittedly all about the $$$ but I think CC is a little more concerned about playing somewhere he'll be happy.
Posted by: astralpanda | December 08, 2008 at 04:25 PM
Bill Madden said that Sheets has a worse injury record than Burnett? Does Madden do ANY research on his subject matter before he writes? If you look at their careers, Sheets has been healthier, has pitched more games in fewer seasons, and has been LESS injured in general than Burnett.
Posted by: sabernar | December 08, 2008 at 04:29 PM
"I see what you are saying, too. However, going on your assesment, 30k does not mean much of a difference in lifestyle. 30 million means a great deal of a difference of lifestyle. "
You want to tell me what part of your lifestyle you would have to cut out with 110 million dollars, that you wouldn't have to with 140 million? Maybe if you have 14 houses, a yacht, a timeshare on a jet, and a couple of small countries on the 110 million dollar salary, you wouldn't be able to afford an unlimited plan on your cell phone like you would with the 140 million, but aside from that, whats the difference?
Posted by: nrmax88 | December 08, 2008 at 04:31 PM
"How about setting your kids, grand kids, great grand kids etc up with enough money that they can do whatever they want in life and be able to live comfortably."
Yeah, the poor little bastards might have to hit the soup kitchen if CC is only making 110 million. Give me a break. I think CC could establish a nice little trust fund for his children with 110 mil.
Posted by: nrmax88 | December 08, 2008 at 04:33 PM
""Also, there's an article making the rounds where Bill Madden quotes an industry source as saying Greg Genske is "dead as an agent" if Sabathia ends up signing for $120MM."
Bill Madden is one of the biggest morons I have ever seen in my life. He is worthless. He said that on Daily News Live on SNY. But the thing is, this makes literally no sense at all. He gets his guy 140 million, but his guy prefers to take the 110 and play at home. Why the hell would he be dead as an agent? Bill Madden is bumbling old idiot. Union be damned, CC can play wherever he wants. If he chose to he could sign for a million bucks and nobody could do a damn thing about it.
Posted by: nrmax88 | December 08, 2008 at 04:35 PM
"Bill Madden said that Sheets has a worse injury record than Burnett? Does Madden do ANY research on his subject matter before he writes?"
In a word. No.
Posted by: nrmax88 | December 08, 2008 at 04:36 PM
sabernar,
In the past 4 years Sheets has made 22, 17, 24, and 31 starts. Over the same time period Burnett has made 32, 21, 25, and 34. Burnett has a worse injury history in the sense that he missed almost all of 2003 and about half of 2004, while Sheets threw 200+ innings every year from 2002-2004, but once you start focusing on recent history Burnett does start to look a little bit safer.
Posted by: nixa37 | December 08, 2008 at 04:38 PM
some other things to consider:
first, and this isn't my idea but one thing to consider is the cost of living, which, no matter what, would be much lower in the Milwaukee-area than in NYC-area, so it's not really $30-40mil he's leaving on the table all told.
plus, if the Brewers offer CC one or more opt-out opportunities, it could benefit him because he can make $20mil+ for a couple years and then sign still sign a 6-year deal that might take him to retirement after that, maximizing career dollars. there are a lot of things to consider, not just the obvious $30mil discrepancy in raw dollars.
Posted by: ghosthorn | December 08, 2008 at 04:40 PM
Don't forget, the players union will be 'pushing' him to accept that extra 30 million.
Posted by: studio179 | December 08, 2008 at 04:41 PM
so CC told colletti that he wants to be a dodger? interesting...i wonder what numbers colletti will propose to CC.
5years $130MM? less than the yankees but he gets to play in the NL and in CA.
Posted by: thinkblue | December 08, 2008 at 04:43 PM
"4:32pm: Sabathia apparently told Colletti he wants to be a Dodger. Speaking to reporters, Colletti left it as a "possibility" the Dodgers could get involved."
Posted by: Rolling{Night}Hawk{09} | December 08, 2008 at 04:44 PM
It's also entirely possible that Colletti was just tweaking Manny by giving some impression that the Dodgers could use $ to go after CC instead of him.
That's what 99% of these rumors are...one side tweaking and then the other side reacting and posturing and then it repeats. It is all part of the negotiation process and also to throw other teams off of what you really want to do.
Seriously, what team wouldn't want CC or Tex? if you want to sneak in and get him you have to look like you have other things going on.
Posted by: CMM | December 08, 2008 at 04:44 PM
At this point... I'll just believe whatever when CC signs.
Posted by: start_wearing_purple | December 08, 2008 at 04:54 PM
CC would be leaving a lot of money on the table to sign with a team besides the yankees, but it would be refreshing to see a super star sign with a team he'd legitimately like to play for opposed to chasing down every last dollar bill to play for a team that doesn't interest him. do what you want, CC. besides, what on earth are you going to do with 110 million dollars that you can't do with 140?
Posted by: jmurray | December 08, 2008 at 04:58 PM
Haven't we seen this with the Angels already? They claim they want to stop with their biggest priority and go after something less important to them. I think Colletti is trying to get Manny to respond and drive up prices possibly. Or he may be serious, but I don't think so.
Posted by: Gamevice | December 08, 2008 at 05:04 PM
If I were the Yankees I would move on and make a harder push for Lowe/Burnett. Sabathia has sent his message. 140 mil sittin on the table (record pitcher contract) for 3 weeks? I would not plan on having CC in pinstripes anymore. I dont think he's trying to haggle for more money. he's trying to get an offer from the dodgers or the angels. Its blatently obvious.
Posted by: Santana/Beckett FTW | December 08, 2008 at 05:26 PM
i think 5/115 would get the job done for the angels or the dodgers for cc
Posted by: Santana/Beckett FTW | December 08, 2008 at 05:27 PM
whereas for the yankees to seal the deal i think will take another year and another 25 mil.
Posted by: Santana/Beckett FTW | December 08, 2008 at 05:27 PM
Some people posting what's the difference between 110 & 140 million are the same ones complaining over gas prices in July. There is a difference.
If you believe the reports of CC telling Colletti he wants to be a Dodger, then all Colletti has to do is offer 80 million. Going on the theory of 110 to 140 million or 'what can you do with an extra 30 million', right? Ofcourse, it would be 60 million to the Yankees offer. Still, That would not fly.
I guess if the Dodgers offered something less, but competitive, he would sign in LA because he wants to be near home. Like SWP posted, I'll believe where he signs, when he signs.
Posted by: studio179 | December 08, 2008 at 05:31 PM
Perhaps an NY resident reading this can corroborate, but I remember reading something about NY state and local taxes being higher than that of any other ML city (on top of having the highest or near the highest cost of living). If all that is true, then a 30 mil difference isn't quite a 30 mil difference.
Posted by: ThinkBlech | December 08, 2008 at 05:49 PM
Ny has pretty high property taxes whihc is why they have good school systems. It's probably one of the reasons alot of NY athletes live in the burbs in Jersey or CT.
Posted by: Casanova Wong | December 08, 2008 at 05:52 PM
Actually the taxes in the "burbs" and NJ are higher than NYC..which is why THEIR schools are so good. NJ has some of the highest property taxes int he country, as does Long Island.
However, if you are going to take taxes and cost of living into consideration then you have to take the money he can make in endorsements into consideration as well. He can make much more in NYC than in Milwalkee and most other places.
Posted by: yankeegirl49 | December 08, 2008 at 06:08 PM
"Some people posting what's the difference between 110 & 140 million are the same ones complaining over gas prices in July. There is a difference."
of course there is a difference between 110 and 140 million dollars. nobody is claiming 110 million LA dollars are better than 140 million NY dollars.
the point is that a majority of the material we've read from ESPN analysts, close friends of sabathia's and beat reporters indicate that CC would love to pitch in california, whether it be with the giants, dodgers, or angels. his shunning the highest bidder in favor of nicer weather, proximity to family, and desire to hit in the NL would undoubtedly be a step out of the ordinary for a player of his caliber.
i guess with only 110 million dollars he will only be able to buy 32 mansions and 12 private islands opposed to 40 mansions and 15 private islands.
the gas prices comparison was baffling. are we really going to compare struggling middle class citizens to the guy who is going to be the richest pitcher in history?
Posted by: jmurray | December 08, 2008 at 06:18 PM
New Jersey Sucks. That is all.
Posted by: Casanova Wong | December 08, 2008 at 06:18 PM
jmurray, I was referring to another poster who was trying to compare middle class money with millionaire money. My comments are baffling to you because his comment of his comparrison was baffling to me. I knew someone would focus on the gas comment and not the bigger picture. You kind of jumped in the middle and did not catch the beginning. If you did, you would see at least where I am coming from. You may still disagree, that's ok.
My point is there is a difference between 110 & 140 unlike the poster was claiming. I think the other poster and I do agree that total dollars is not everyone's objective. Is it CC's or not? It looks like it is not, but until a deal is done, we don't know.
"of course there is a difference between 110 and 140 million dollars. nobody is claiming 110 million LA dollars are better than 140 million NY dollars."
I thought the 110 million offer was from Milwaukee, not LA. I was not aware LA made an official offer yet. They will.
Posted by: studio179 | December 08, 2008 at 06:38 PM
If C.C. is willing to take a somewhat backloaded deal, perhaps the LA thing could happen. Dodgers are really hamstrung by the Schmidt and Jones contracts.
Posted by: vtadave | December 08, 2008 at 06:45 PM
I think CC wanting to meet with the yankees two times is a good sign for them.
Posted by: yanks12025 | December 08, 2008 at 07:34 PM
want to look at things from some different glasses? Try
http://lsos1.blogspot.com/
Posted by: Dan | December 08, 2008 at 09:22 PM
If the Giants weren't gonna make a run at Sabathia, wouldn't they just openly state that? If they weren't thinking very seriously about givign him an offer, they wouldn't be so deliberately unclear on their intentions.
Posted by: wildabeast4 | December 08, 2008 at 09:29 PM
the fact that theres a report on mlb.com saying the yanks are going "full throttle" at burnett, i wonder if the 2nd meeting didnt go to well
Posted by: lakersdodgersyankees4life | December 08, 2008 at 09:36 PM
I agree, I think the Giants are being vague about their intentions for the simple fact that he decides to sign with the Yankees... I think the Giants do have an idea, that they probably cannot get Tex or Manny, they probably won't be able to trade for a huge bat w/out moving Cain, so, their #1 priority IMO is CC Sabathia. Hell, even with a line-up where your 3 4 5 hitters end up Sandoval, Cantu, Molina... With a rotation of Timmy, CC, Cain, Zito.... Who cares?
Posted by: kuyote | December 08, 2008 at 09:41 PM
These CC negotiations are nearly as wild and "who knows what is really going on" as the Peavy rumors are. I truly hope that Heyman has it wrong and Boston just had a chat with genske regarding CC, that guy is a blowup target with his huge weight, if he's not 300+ lbs now, he will be in a couple of years after landing the big contract he's gonna get soon and Boston does not need the guy in a bad way anyway, better to watch and wait for a prime trade candidate, or bring along more prized kids they already have in the minors than this guy.
Posted by: johns | December 08, 2008 at 10:49 PM
Dear Red Sox,
GTFO!
Thanks.
Posted by: InvalidUserID | December 08, 2008 at 10:57 PM
I don't think CC's high innings count is a red flag. Like someone said nobody could have cared for their body less than David Wells and the guy never got hurt (unless you count when he was 40+). There are certain players whose bodies just seem to never break down regardless of what they do, and certain players who condition themselves obsessively and still wind up on the DL.
That being said I'm glad CC finally came out and said he isn't delaying, just collecting all the facts. This is a 6 year commitment people, you just don't jump into this without taking a good long hard look at what you are about to do.
Posted by: yanks09 | December 08, 2008 at 11:00 PM