MLB Rumors - MLB Trade Rumors
Subscribe to MLB Trade Rumors using RSS
Home     Contact     About     Advertise     Archives     Widget     Twitter      RSS Usage

« Phillies Acquire Ronny Paulino | Main | Brewers Looking For Pitching »

Jake Peavy Rumors: Wednesday

8:36pm: MLB.com's Corey Brock learned from Towers that he should know one way or another on a Peavy trade by the end of the Meetings.  Towers now believes a fourth team will be required.  Towers mentioned that Marquis and DeRosa may be hangups, especially Marquis' contract.  Though he'd prefer not to, under certain circumstances the Padres might pay some of his salary.

There was some goofy Carlos Carrasco/Jason Donald stuff we didn't link to today, and that was shot down.  Brock suggests names like Josh Vitters, Felix Pie, and Kevin Hart could be involved on the Cubs' part.

8:31pm: Jayson Stark says Peavy to the Cubs doesn't seem inevitable anymore, and the sides have not made progress in the last 24 hours.  The Cubs have leverage, so they've dug in their heels.  Stark adds that once word of the possible inclusion of DeRosa linked, Jim Hendry has been "bombarded with calls from other clubs interested" in him.  Hendry does not want to trade DeRosa.

6:00pm: Buster Olney says the Yankees have talked with the Padres recently about Peavy, but it didn't go anywhere.

5:19pm: Brock talked to a Padres source who does not believe the Twins are involved.

4:10pm: Buster Olney says Axelrod left the Meetings with no word of a deal but the expectation is still that the Cubs will get it done.

3:48pm: Tom Krasovic reminds us that Peavy's agent Barry Axelrod said going into the Meetings that the Yankees would be more attractive to his client if they signed C.C. Sabathia.  Still, Peavy prefers the NL.

3:17pm: Corey Brock says the Phillies might want Scott Hairston from the Padres to use in left field.

2:33pm: Carrie Muskat's Cubs source says DeRosa will not be traded.

9:45am: LEN3 says the Twins discussed DeRosa with the Cubs yesterday.  The Cubs will present the Twins with a list of pitchers they like, which will be influenced by the Padres' preferences.

9:31am: There's word from Jim Salisbury that pitcher Kyle Kendrick could be included in this three-team trade.

1:19am: If you dare to sort through yesterday's Jake Peavy rumors, click here.  Today, Gordon Wittenmyer of the Chicago Sun-Times maintains that the biggest obstacle is the Cubs moving part of Jason Marquis' contract.  Another factor - the Padres will need to free up several spots on the 40-man roster.  The Cubs' sale will not be an issue.

Wittenmyer adds that a Phillies official didn't expect to get Mark DeRosa from the Cubs but rather other players.  Also, Cubs officials shot down the John Perrotto rumor that the Cubs might shop Carlos Zambrano after acquiring Peavy.

Tom Krasovic of the San Diego Union-Tribune also weighs in.  He says the Padres have discussed Phils catching prospect Jason Jaramillo.


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e20105364efc64970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Jake Peavy Rumors: Wednesday:

Comments

I will cut Fenton a little slack. He undervalues DeRosa. Unless you see him daily, he could be seen as 'another guy' on the team. He is not going to win an MVP, gold glove or make many highlight reels. DeRosa does his job. He puts up very solid, not great numbers. He is a professional and great team mate. I would call him one of the leaders on the Cubs. His defense/offense do not suffer playing a number of positions. How many guys do that? Not many. No one is placing him in the HOF. Cub fans are just saying the guy has a lot of value you don't find all that easily.

Again, cutting a little slack because many Cub fans did not know that when he was a Ranger and Hendry signed him to the Cubs. Then you see it.

"Cubs get Peavy
O's get Pie
Twins get DeRosa,
Padres get Olson, Marquis(+$4mm, Slowey/Perkins (from twins), Mike Redmond (from twins), Cedeno, Hart"

This offer seems pretty realistic to me from everything we've heard. If not the twins maybe the Phillies in a very similar deal.

Its not ownership, i dont understand why people are saying that when every single day the CEO of the team and the GM of the team say thats crazy. Apparently some fans know more than people who run the team.

wonder if the Phils balked at happ and instead offered Kendrick because they're concerned they're not getting Lowe as the yanks will swoop in with a ridiculous offer for him which then sent the Cubs to Minnesota???

I-Cubs,

I think that the one thing only holding this up is that hendry is sitting on this either cause we haven't signed that left bat yet or because nobody wants marquis. Other wise I think a deal would have been accepted by hendry already

I'll say it again. The fact that D-Ro will probably be a type A free agent after next year has to up his value, at least a little.

If people are going to call him a utility player, then he is the best one in baseball.

I would actually love to see the Cubs commit to Fontenot. He made a believer out of me this year. I do love having D-Ro though. He is the best insurance against an injury that you can get.

I don't know, this whole thing is making my head spin. I can understand the undervaluing DeRosa thing as well...people were saying that the Adam Kennedy signing was better than the DeRosa one, and that Hendry overpaid. Little did they know, they would look like fools the next year, and even bigger ones the year after that. However, I would also worry if I were the Phils about helping the Cubs out. There is no arguing that the Phils are a better team this year with DeRosa on it than they would be without him though.

I believe Towers has already said he does not want Marquis. Even the Cubs eating salary is too much for him I would guess. Ofcourse, Towers says so much I can't remember everything.

BREAKING NEWS:

Bruce Levine is reporting the deal is pretty much done. DeRosa to Philly, Vitters, Marquis, Hart and Philly prospects to SD, Peavy to Cubs.

DeRo is NOT a utility player. He can play a ton of positions, but he hits to well to be a "utility" player. He is a starter somewhere on almost every team. And, unless DeRosa tanks, he is pretty much a Type A.


"if u think the twins will give up perk for derosa straight up you are insane."

Perkins is heavily flukish. Any of the other Twins pitchers, no way, but DeRosa for Perkins looks fair for both sides. Although the Twins really don't need DeRosa, unless he can play 3B.

"Bruce Levine is reporting the deal is pretty much done. DeRosa to Philly, Vitters, Marquis, Hart and Philly prospects to SD, Peavy to Cubs."


...

Marquis? I assume the Cubs are eating plenty of salary.

And, I don't buy that for one second.

haha EK

NICE TRY!!!

Happ/Kendrick and Jaramillo for DeRosa would be a fine deal in my book. Trading Carrasco (and another piece no less!) is akin to the Coburn for Zhitnik swap between the Flyers and Thrashers a couple years back. Dealing Carrasco would be a failure.

Question for a Phillies fan:

We all know Carrasco is the big fish in the Phillies system, and Donald's good as blocked.

Who,among the other Phillies prospects, is the top guy? Michael Taylor? Don't know much about Phils farm.

If this deal goes down I see the Cubs going after Roberts trading away Cedeno, Pie, Marshall, prospect X

Then sign Milton Bradley to a 1 or 2 year deal giving you a lineup of:

1. roberts 2b
2. theriot ss
3. lee 1b
4. ramierez 3b
5. bradley rf
6. soriano lf
8. soto c
9. johnson/fukudome cf

and rotation

1. Zambrano
2. Peavy
3. Dempster
4. Harden
5. Lilly

I realize this scenario will really stretch the payroll, but maybe Hendry will pull something off to make it happen

"Cubs get Peavy
O's get Pie
Twins get DeRosa,
Padres get Olson, Marquis(+$4mm, Slowey/Perkins (from twins), Mike Redmond (from twins), Cedeno, Hart"

This is an absolutely awful trade for the Twins to make.

EK is not making up the Bruce Levine report, I just heard it on the radio myself. Take it with a grain of salt like everything else of course, but Levine usually won't say something until he's pretty sure. He reported the Harden deal last year about an hour before it was officially announced. If they have the deal in place, we'll probably see the old "have reached an agreement in principle" line until after the Rule 5 draft when San Diego can clear roster space to fit the new players on their 40-man.

melonis,

other names are:
Michael taylor
Dominic Brown
Lou Marson (you likely know)
Quintin Berry
Kyle Drabek
Travis D'Arnaud
Joe Savery
Antonio Bastardo
Edgar Garcia

a ton of lower level pitching prospects like:

Julian Sampson
Michael Cisco
Jason Knapp
Vance Worley
Jarred Cossart
Jonathan Pettibone
Michael Stutes
Justin DeFratus
Brian Rosenberg
Michael Schwimmer.


Most of the above are among our top prospects. Most good pitching is was at Low A this year and competed for the SAL title.

O'Cey, they're not going to get Roberts. The O's aren't shopping him, they're trying to extend him. Besides, Cedeno, Pie, Marshall, +1 is the same package that MacPhail turned down last year, why would he take it now?

"haha EK

NICE TRY!!!"

Trust me, I don't blame you for not believing me as I wouldn't believe it either. But Levine did report this just 30 minutes ago. He said there are a few things they need to figure out, but the deal is all but finalized. And yes, they will be eating half of Marquis' salary.

Interesting that the Pie/Olson portion wasn't mentioned. I wonder if he just left that out by mistake or not.....

Kyle Kendrick blows.

Kyle Kendrick blows.


so does Marquis. at least Kendrick while being horrible, is cheap.

Marquis is average, so I'm not sure you can say he "blows" philswschamps.

I guess this solidifies EK's Bruce Levine Report...

http://stations.espn.go.com/stations/espnradio1000/blog?id=3738908

That is from Bruce Levine

"I guess this solidifies EK's Bruce Levine Report..."

Didn't know he had a blog.....but yep, that is what he said. I left out the part about him mentioning a deal in the works for an outfielder. Curious who that could be. Teahen? I hope not. Hermida? That would be nice but I don't think they have enough to offer. Dejesus? I'd be okay with him if he's healthy. Anyone else I am missing that is available via trade???

philsWSchamps- Awesome. Thanks.

I really, really like Drabek. He's got great upside. Taylor's nice too.
I don't see why either should be traded for DeRosa.

I've heard of Marson, just forgot about him. IMO Phillies shouldn't trade Marson. If any catcher goes, its Jaramillo.

I'm assuming that the Padres will want a young pitcher with good upside from Philly. I don't think Kendrick will cut it. I'm assuming Happ already has his spot in the rotation. Carrasco shouldn't be touched for a rental.

Since the Phils don't have that many near-MLB ready front-type guys, I say Bastardo/Savery + Donald + low level guy gets it done.

I'm guessing Hermida or signing Bradley

that report said "At the same time, the Cubs are working on a trade to bring an outfielder to the club. I'll check-in when I know more."

I wonder what that is? Giles maybe? I hope not teahan. I could live with Hermida and could definately live with DeJesus.

what other options are out there.

If its true why hasn't tim heard about it yet?..

"I'm guessing Hermida or signing Bradley"

Where will the Cubbies get the prospects to get Hermida? Aren't they shipping them away for Peavy?

"If its true why hasn't tim heard about it yet?.."

Not sure. Maybe we should make our own site since he isn't keeping up.....lol

Not going to happen but I am just thinking this...

On Tuesday, the Cincinnati Reds traded versatile INF/OF Ryan Freel and two minor leaguers to the Baltimore Orioles for catcher Ramon Hernandez. Freel is a speedy, top-of-the-order utility player who can play second. He played the majority of his games in the Reds' outfield in 2008 and batted leadoff or second in over 90 percent of his at-bats last season. Injuries limited him to 47 games last year and 75 in 2007, but prior to that he had stolen 30 or more bases in three consecutive seasons.

This could be good for the Orioles, because unless they get Tex, which isn’t going to happen, they most likely will not compete. Could we still deal for Roberts, if we trade DeRosa?

Pie, Marshall, Guzman, Cedeno, Wuertz???

I think Tim tends to only post stuff that comes up on the 'net, and the Levine report was on the radio. I had no idea he even had a blog until I saw the link above.

I'm at a loss as to how they would acquire an outfielder in a trade. I've been assuming they were going to sign one of Bradley, Abreu, or Ibanez.

This is the nasty nasty starting rotation!! haha Good gambling season to bet on the cubbies

Philly Fans you will be so happy with D-Ro! Don't worry about your crapy prospects...

Here is the order of outfielders I would like them to aquire either by FA or trade:


1. Giles
2. Milton Bradley
3. DeJesus

All the others aren't very appealing either because of the contracts they would command, or what we would have to give up.

Just throwing out ideas here.

It said something about Zambrano could be traded? What about Carlos Zambrano for Carlos Beltran?

I think that Levine Report is just him being behind in the rumors, that was basically the scenario being talked about yesterday afternoon.

Also, if Towers likes Olson, I'm not sure why Hendry wouldn't do Pie for Olson and include him in the trade instead of Hart. Also, I'm not sure why Towers wants Vitters either, so that trade doesn't seem very likely.

How about J. Kubel, Twins to the Cubs?

"I think that Levine Report is just him being behind in the rumors, that was basically the scenario being talked about yesterday afternoon."

Levine is in Vegas and he reported that after hearing from someone at the meetings.

Banks, Levine is in Vegas at the meetings reporting in as he hears things, so he's not behind. Why wouldn't Towers want Vitters? He's an amazingly high-ceiling prospect that projects to be ML ready in 2-3 years, right around the time the Pads are thinking they'll be competitive again.

I think we see this deal get announced after the Rule 5 draft is completed.

Cubs get: Peavy
Philly gets: DeRosa
SD gets: Vitters, Marquis + $5 million, Hart, Happ, and one more Philly prospect.

I think Marquis makes more sense for the Pads than it seems. Cubs eat half his salary, they pay $5 for a one-year committment to a guy to fill in the gap in their rotation created by Peavy's leaving who will eat some innings and pitch around .500 ball, then he's off their books next year, clearing another $5 mil in payroll space.

"Here is the order of outfielders I would like them to aquire either by FA or trade:


1. Giles
2. Milton Bradley
3. DeJesus

All the others aren't very appealing either because of the contracts they would command, or what we would have to give up."

I have no problem with that list. #1 & #3 are longshots at best.

"It said something about Zambrano could be traded? What about Carlos Zambrano for Carlos Beltran?"

Wittenmyer says Cub brass shot the Zambrano trade rumor down.

Just throwing out ideas here.

It said something about Zambrano could be traded? What about Carlos Zambrano for Carlos Beltran?


The Mets would NEVER do that, although I'd love them to.

CubFanForLife - As a Padre fan I agree that if Cubs eat half of his salary Maquis makes a ton of sense for the Padres.

Grey Suit-
What's the feeling among Padre fans on this whole trade in general? Is there any ill-sentiment towards Peavy for dictating where he's being traded to (and thereby reducing the haul Towers can get for him)? As a Cub fan I'm elated that it looks like we're going to acquire him, but obviously there's a lot of teams that could offer you guys more than we are if Jake was willing to go there.

"I think we see this deal get announced after the Rule 5 draft is completed.

Cubs get: Peavy
Philly gets: DeRosa
SD gets: Vitters, Marquis + $5 million, Hart, Happ, and one more Philly prospect"

For what it's worth, the Levine reports suggests that the Cubs would get at least a second prospect from Philly.

Dunce-

That's why I added the 'one more Philly prospect' after Happ.

Or do you mean that the Cubs would be getting a prospect from Philly that they would keep rather than send to SD?

CubFanForLife - There is a general frustration in San Diego because of the owner slashing the payroll from $70 mil to $40 mil and we know that Peavy has to be traded to make this happen. I dont think you can blame Jake for dictating where he wants to go...he took a pay cut to stay in SD and now less than a year after he signed his contract the Padres want to ship him out of town...if I was him I would prob do the same thing.

In the beginning I think there was a little resentment from some fans towards Peavy because the FO made it seem like Peavy was pushing to be traded which was completley untrue and it came out later that they are doing it to cut payroll so all resentment has been shifted to the owner.

Sorry, yes, that's what I'm implying.

Muskat rumor -

DeRosa staying put? Don't think so. Everything coming out of Chicago is that he will most definitely be dealt if/when the Peavy trade happens.

Last year, at age 33, Mark DeRosa posted an OBP and Slugging Percentage 20 and 60 points above his career average, respectively. It is highly unlikely that he will come close to those numbers in 2009, and completely speculative to say that he would be a Type A free agent after the season.

Happ is a young, left-handed pitcher who racks up Ks, is team-controlled for another 5 years, and is currently our most viable 5th starter option. Trading him for one year of Mark DeRosa does not make any sense.

I shudder to think who the "other prospect" we've thrown in is, assuming this report is true.

"It is highly unlikely that he will come close to those numbers in 2009, and completely speculative to say that he would be a Type A free agent after the season."

This is his third year in a row of blowing his "career" numbers away...I think its time to put the "he isn't good, last year was a career year" thing behind us all being that he has done it three years in a row. This is the same stuff said by the Cardinals fans when they chose Kennedy instead of DeRosa.

"Carrie Muskat's Cubs source says DeRosa will not be traded."

They also said the Cubs weren't interested in Peavy like 2 weeks ago...she needs a new source.

I'm a big DeRosa fan, but I think it'd be tough to trade 5 years of Happ for just 1 year of him and probably a draft pick or two (I don't know if he'll end up as a type A if he's in LF most of next season). Kendrick would clearly be a no brainer, but I'm actually pretty high on Happ, as least in terms of his ability to be a capable starter right now.

Aduncaroo,

I may just be a drunk and angry Philly fan but I definitely missed all those other years DeRosa was slugging .481

Look, we get it, Cubs fans love him, he gets his uniform dirty, etc. etc. That doesn't mean he's worth giving up young pitching for.

I don't want Philly fans to have to worry themselves with DeRosa. I hope the Cubs get to keep him in '09. There, it's solved.

If you believe the reports that DeRosa was involved with the Phils, then believe the report that your GM said he is not.

Now, the Phillies are interested in Scott Hairston for LF.

Really?

"Carrie Muskat's Cubs source says DeRosa will not be traded."

Great, so we'll probably hear tomorrow that Derosa is expected to be traded...

well IF DeRosa's out I'd assume the Phils are out which is A-OK by me. hopefully this whole thing falls apart so the entire NL doesn't have to worry about the juggernaut that would be the Cubs REGULAR SEASON rotation.

With Moyer still unsigned, a trade of Happ would mean the following for the Phillies rotation:

Hollywood
Myers
Blanton
???
???

With ??? and ??? most likely ending up as Kendrick and Eaton.

Ew.

"I may just be a drunk and angry Philly fan but I definitely missed all those other years DeRosa was slugging .481"

He has slugged .420 or better 4 years in a row, and was at .456 two years ago. Oh, his OBP has gone up 4 straight years as well. Yes, last year was his best year. But to cite his career numbers when he was used irregularly and expect that they end up looking like that, well...its uninformed.

just make the damn trade already

Probably would most likely be Kedrick and Carassco, which still makes me uncomfortable.

scott hairston??? are they kidding??? WHere do they make this crap up.

Let's see Scott Hariston vs Pat Burrell. hmmmm.

Do they just try to find right handed outfielders to throw at us.

Is there a reason that we, the fans, spent $25 million or more in ticket revenue selling out thru the World Series and then the additional merchandise so that these idiots can do nothing with it. They had better not try to give us a Scott Hairston or similar player in left field.

The whole DeRosa thing could have been made up by Towers, who knows. The fact is Towers is the one who admitted he got a third and fourth team involved. Hendry is trying to get offense and does not really like three or four way deals anyway. Maybe there was or is truth to DeRosa being involved. Maybe Hendry is squashing the notion or maybe Amaro is not getting involved. There are many factors with multiple teams involved.

"[DeRosa] has slugged .420 or better 4 years in a row."

Right, and his career SPC is .422. So when I said his 481 SPC from last year was 60 points off his baseline I was ... wrong?

"Oh, his OBP has gone up 4 straight years as well."

Okay, let's pretend his OBP will around 370 forever and ever. So he's a light-hitting, versatile infielder who can take a walk. Still don't think it's worth giving up cheap young pitching for him.

A posting from Muskat saying DeRosa will not be traded.

The next update has Brock saying the Twins are in on DeRosa.

You have to love it.

There you go Philly fans. If you believe the latest report, you are off the hook for DeRosa.

Up next: Twinkie fans hating Mark.

Yeah well, at least unless we get him. Then I'll have to construct an argument around how great he is and how we totally fleeced Hendry.

I certainly don't consider 21 HRs and 87 RBIs 'light hitting'. Mark DeRosa never got a chance to start full time until 2007 with the Cubs. He posted career highs across the board that year, then surpassed them all last year, all while being the ultimate team player, a leader in the clubhouse, and a reporter's dream with great sound bytes. Why all the hate for this guy? You Phils fans get way to attached to unproven, mediocre pitching prospects. Casey Blake just got 3 years and 17.1 mil from the Dodgers after putting up numbers almost identical to DeRosa. Blake plays 3rd base. DeRosa plays 2nd, 3rd, LF, RF, and 1st and seems to almost get de-valued for that.

"Okay, let's pretend his OBP will around 370 forever and ever. So he's a light-hitting, versatile infielder who can take a walk. Still don't think it's worth giving up cheap young pitching for him."

He has been above average for ALL hitters the last 3 years, let alone 2nd basemen. To say he is a "light hitting" 2nd basemen makes you seem uninformed.

Forever and ever isn't a question. Next year is all that matters, he is a free agent after that. How many other players do you have in mind that will have an OPS+ around 110 next year that can fill in for Utley, and then move around to 4 other positions after that, all while hitting very well?

And BTW, anything that Carrie Muskat says is complete BS. Her Cubs 'source' is probably the guy who sweeps out the bleachers during the offseason at Wrigley. :)

My points are not to make DeRosa sound like you should be giving up the farm for him. I just don't like to see him undervalued...and with Utley out for awhile, I would think you would love to have him on your team. I just don't really understand all the undervaluing going on...

This would be better than signing any of the remaining pitchers for the Yanks!!! I hope they go for it...

If Peavy is willing to go to the Yankees why not be open to coming to the phillies. I bet the phillies could come up with a package to get him since the pads like the phillies pitching. I Rather have a cheaper peavy then overpaying for an aging Lowe. On the negative side, I would not like to empty the farm to get him(we finally have a decent farm system). IMO it fits, if he would just open up his options.

1.Wants to play for a winner
2.Prefers the NL
3.At least open to playing on the East Coast
4.Pads like are pitching

oh crap! here come the yankees fans.

The problem with the Padres giving up Hairston is, the Cubs now aren't giving up anything of interest to bait the Phillies.

Phillies either need pitching or an outfielder. The Padres need to bring a 3rd team in because the Cubs don't have young pitchers with frontline upside. Carrasco isn't going anywhere, so forget about that.

Maybe a 1 year rental of Rich Harden, but I don't think that'd be a smart move for Philly (it'd be a buy high, and he had a few injury concerns at the end of this season). But that rotation would be sick sick sick.

Yankees had A TON of money come off payroll!! They are doing what they have to do.. Like i have said a million times...I feel fortunate being a Yankee fan!!

Certainly Peavy would waive his NTC to come to Canada.

Jake Peavy for Adam Lind, Brett Cecil, Edgar Estanga, and Kyle Ginley.

Highly unlikely but any chance Bedard get non tendered. Would be a great pick up for the phils or any team but I think it's not gonna happen they gave up too much to get him.

Peavey to the Yankees again? Not a chance unless Chamberlain is in the deal!

Even if the Yankees need to find a 3rd team, Chamberlain is the only desireable, major league ready pitcher the Yankees have to offer in a trade for Peavey.

Kennedy and Hughes are still prospects but are "extras" now - not the centerpiece that San Diego or a third team would want in a Peavey trade.

Umm...I disagree bernie. Even as a Cubs fan.

Hughes, Kennedy, and a couple of B prospects gets this done...if Peavy waives his NTC, which I doubt he will do with a deal to the team he really wants to go to almost done. Plus, what song would he sing when he was drunk this weekend?

It's a shame Hairston hasn't played 2B in a few years - he would have been a viable substitute for DeRosa in the deal otherwise (though not as good, presumably he'd cost less). As a righty platoon guy in LF, he could help, but I wouldn't give up much more than Jaramillo (if that) for him.

No way Bedard is non-tendered. The M's would want to get at least something back, after all they gave up to get him in the first place.

Aduncaroo,

The same one C.C. is singing now
Money money money money, MONEY
Money money money money, MONEY
Money money money money, MONEY
Money money money money, MONEY
Money money money money, MONEY
Money money money money, MONEY

I thought the center piece is Austin Jackson who is a top 20 prospect...then you add a Hughes OR a Kennedy and one or two more lower prospects...that gets it done i would think

Well, I think Towers wants pitching more than anything, so he might prefer Hughes and Kennedy. However, I'm pretty certain Hughes and Jackson + B prospect or two gets it done as well.

Hope the Yanks sign Burnett. The Braves idiotic GM obviously didn't learn anything from Mike Hampton. And why is it that everyone wants to help out the Cubs? O yeah the haven't won a WS in like 100 yrs. But I still don't see that happening even after they get Peavy.

Braves want Burnett bad!!! Girardi was interviewed on new York show a little while ago and he was very impressed with Sheets...Hope he has some say!!! They are also in talks with Pettitte and Lowe!! I DONT WANT BURNETT!!!

"However, I'm pretty certain Hughes and Jackson + B prospect or two gets it done as well."

if that was on the table i think it would be done today

wait Steve Phillips just said we give up Donald and Carrasco for DeRosa, Ruben don't do it.

Well, with the constant Peavy updates, no word on a lefty hitter yet.

The Cubs seem to be out of the Ibanez derby. He wants 10/3 and is more in line with someone else.

Hendry is still hot after Bradley. So is Tampa Bay.

Just thought I would break up the Peavy 'status quo' chat.

If the Cubs can get Donald and Carrasco for DeRosa...just keep them and let Fontenot play 2nd!

I have a feeling this is more about Phillips being Phillips...

Seriously though, I would not mind Bradley. Just hope he does not get into trouble.

Peavy would be a much better investment for the Yanks than all the remaining pitchers...If they convinced Sabathia to come, go get Peavy.

1. Sabathia
2. Peavy
3. Wang
4. Chaimberlain
5. Pettite or Sheets or Lowe

WOW!!!!!

Towers said by Thursday after the Rule 5 draft he would know if a Cub deal for Peavy was in play soon or if Peavy starts the year as a Padre. Then see what market opens up in July.

I will stick to my word, if the Cubs deal for Peavy falls through, the Yankees will push hard and land Peavy. Would be a sick rotation.

Carrie Muscrat is either the most "in the know" or has no idea what she is talking about. Every article she writes is the exact opposite of the rumors that are circulating.

Or she's the misinformation portal for Hendry

According to ESPN, the Phillies would send either Minor League pitcher J.A. Happ or Carlos Carrasco plus shortstop Jason Donald to the Cubs in exchange for DeRosa. The Cubs would then send the two young Phillies players to the Padres for Peavy along with Jason Marquis, Felix Pie and Josh Vitters.

I like this if the Cubs are not eating any of Marquis Salary, but most likely they are... and if that is the case I'd try to switch it up a little if I was Hendry, maybe keep Jason Donald and send Cedeno or hold on to Felix Pie to trade for a reliver. Towers is the one with his back against the wall, Hendry should hold out to gain more leverage and make the best deal.. I'd try t hold onto a prospect coming back in the DeRosa trade.

gcheezpuff - we definitely don't want to hold onto Pie for a reliever given Pie is out of options and we're keeping Marshall and Hart so the pen is pretty set

Marmol - closer
Gregg
Szmardjia
Cotts
Gaudin
Marshall
Hart/Guzman

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment


Top Stories



Search MLBTR

Lijit Search

MLBTR Features



Recent Posts


MLBTR Mailing List

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Rumors By Team



Monthly Archives


Live Chats


Tuesdays at 2 p.m. CST



Site Map     Contact     About     Advertise     Privacy Policy     Widget     Twitter     Rss Feed


MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com.