![]() |
|
|
| |
« Odds and Ends: Gammons, Kawakami, Buck | Main | Brewers Offer Arb To Sabathia, Sheets, Shouse »
ESPN's Jayson Stark has the latest on free agent shortstop Rafael Furcal. Furcal's agent Paul Kinzer doesn't see his client signing before the winter meetings, which kick off next week.
Four teams are in on Furcal: the Giants, A's, Braves, and a mystery team. Stark talked to execs who guessed the Red Sox or Orioles could be the fourth team. That team apparently has to make a trade to open up their shortstop position. In a recent poll of over 6,000 MLBTR readers, the A's won the vote as the team most likely to sign Furcal.
The Braves' interest will pick up if they trade shortstop Yunel Escobar first. We knew about the Padres; Stark says the Cardinals and Royals also expressed interest in Escobar.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e2010536278a52970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Rafael Furcal Rumors: Monday:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
I'd like the Cards to get Escobar, but I still don't know about giving up Ludwick though.
Posted by: Cardsfan387 | December 01, 2008 at 03:10 PM
Four teams are in on Furcal: the Giants, A's, Braves, and a mystery team. Stark talked to execs who guessed the Red Sox or Orioles could be the fourth team. That team apparently has to make a trade to open up their shortstop position.
being as how the o's don't have an everyday ss (donnie murphy/ freddie bynum anyone?) i guess they dont need to make a trade to open up room for furcal... must not be the mystery team
Posted by: roguesaw | December 01, 2008 at 03:11 PM
I have mentioned in comments before that the Red Sox make a ton of sense! I was going to vote for them in your Furcal poll but you left them out.
Posted by: Kramerica Industries | December 01, 2008 at 03:11 PM
its amazing. every player has a "MYSTERY TEAM", ie someone the agent is making up to drive up the price. what a joke.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | December 01, 2008 at 03:14 PM
the mystery team is probably the Giants. Hear me out, Sabean is already in on him, furcals agent Is pretty smart, probably remembers when the giants were the only 2 teams in on Zito and is using the same tactics
Posted by: Longing for Manny...Burriss that is!!! | December 01, 2008 at 03:20 PM
it would make sense if it were the Red Sox because they need a shortstop, would have to trade one first, and the Sox are very secretive about their free agent signings.
Posted by: Reality Check | December 01, 2008 at 03:23 PM
One day the Reds are the mystery team, the next theyre not?
Maybe the Reds are trying to trade Gonzales to DET and then sign Furcal...
Posted by: GmblngPtchr20 | December 01, 2008 at 03:29 PM
They may need a lead-off hitter too. Can they trust Ellsbury again?
Posted by: Kramerica Industries | December 01, 2008 at 03:30 PM
As much as I would love Escobar to be part of a package for Greinke, I don't see that. What would the Braves want from the Royals? Please not Guillen...
Posted by: daslied | December 01, 2008 at 03:32 PM
I don't mean to say I told you so... But I did say the Red Sox were the "mystery team" a while ago. I was surprised that they were not listed on the poll and didn't vote because I'm sure it is the Sox.
They make sense to be the perfect mystery team. Lockjaw GM, pending trade talks for the current SS, rookie SS who may be better suited for the supersub role that players like Chone Figgins have used to crack into the bigs.
Posted by: boomer | December 01, 2008 at 03:34 PM
Ask yourselves a question. Who, other than Furcal, has been the most talked about SS that is likely to be on the move this year? The answer: Jack Wilson. The mystery team could be the Pirates as they fit the description; a team that needs to make a move to open up the position and Furcal would definitely be an upgrade over Wilson.
Posted by: rhynorampage | December 01, 2008 at 03:38 PM
I love that little turd nugget Furcal!! He was always my favorite! I hope he ends up back with us, because he is a true Brave4Life!!
Posted by: Brian | December 01, 2008 at 03:45 PM
Pirates are going to sign Furcal? What a joke, and what a stupid idea.
Posted by: GmblngPtchr20 | December 01, 2008 at 03:47 PM
I was under the impression the "mystery" team was the Reds? I don't think the Reds are waiting to move anyone, but rather waiting to see what compensation the Dodgers would get i.e. zero. If the Reds add Furcal and Dye, that could be a nice fit.
Posted by: davidmp2 | December 01, 2008 at 03:55 PM
"As much as I would love Escobar to be part of a package for Greinke, I don't see that. What would the Braves want from the Royals? Please not Guillen..."
I had the same thought, what exaclty are the royals offering for Escobar that would be of any interest to the Braves?
As a Royals fan I'd love to get Escobar over Furcal. Why get yesterdays furcal when you could get tomorrow's furcal?
Anything not involving Grienke I'm down for. Maybe the Braves think they can teach Butler the OF.
Posted by: basicslop | December 01, 2008 at 04:12 PM
I find it hard to believe the Red Sox make a move to sign Furcal; especially before they find a trade partner for Lugo.
Bit of a Catch 22 for them though, they probably won't find a trade partner for Lugo until Furcal, Renteria and Cabrera are off the market.
Eitherway, after the disaster with Renteria a few years back I think the Red Sox have little interest in Furcal.
The Sox ended up paying for Renteria for a long time and I think they will probably be happy to go into next season with Lowrie as their SS for the future.
Can't imagine the Sox are concerned about Ellsbury at leadoff as they can always move Pedroia or Youkilis to leadoff like they did on several occasions last season.
Not to mention, if the Sox are interested in Teixeira, there is just no way they create 1 potential logjam with Lugo/Furcal/Lowrie and then go after Teixeira and create a logjam with Youkilis/Lowell/Teixeira.
Teams would sit back and wait for the Sox to just give them someone as they would know they are handcuffed and had to move guys at that point.
Furcal looks good for almost any team, but for the Red Sox I think they are unlikely to put themselves in that difficult situation.
My darkhorse team is actually the Yankees.
Jeter has definately lost a step or two at SS and could slide to 2B. This would allow the Yanks to seek a solid trade for Cano.
Some rumors I have heard (xm radio) are the Yanks might be interested in Orlando Hudson for 2B, which is this might make some sense instead.
They would get Furcal for leadoff for the next few years and upgrade their defense at SS, I also would tend to argue Jeter would be an upgrade at 2B defensively.
Not to mention, dealing Cano could yield the Yankees a really nice player, most likely a pitcher.
Posted by: KangarooBoxer26 | December 01, 2008 at 04:14 PM
I personally dont see the redsox signing Furcal.
Remember when dustin pedroia came up he struggled a little bit
francona is known to let his young guys battle through the growing pains and give them an extended shot at proving themself.
I would like furcal, fills leadoff hole and plays good defense.
Priority #1 should be tex
Posted by: mike_lee | December 01, 2008 at 04:19 PM
Hey, Red fans, in case you missed it,
"That team apparently has to make a trade to open up their shortstop position"
This certainly implies that it would be a trade, and that it would have have to be an everyday starter that they trade, where in Cincinnati, they have 3 average SS in Gonzales, Keppinger and Richar sharing a platoon.
Posted by: rhynorampage | December 01, 2008 at 04:22 PM
I would love if the Royals got Furcal but you could get Escobar in a trade. Would a trade for Teahen for Escobar work?
Posted by: RoyalsandMariners51 | December 01, 2008 at 04:25 PM
Of course Teahen for Escobar doesn't work. Escobar is a better hitter than Teahan and he plays a premium position at an elite level defensively. This would be like me asking if the Royals would trade Grienke for an ok middle reliever.
Honestly, I struggle to see the Royals and Braves matching up unless Grienke is involved. From the Royals' perspective, I would think 5 years of Escobar in return for 2 of Grienke would be interesting.
Posted by: nixa37 | December 01, 2008 at 04:31 PM
Hoynes said the Indians have cooled-off in terms of looking for an INF, but they could be the elusive "mystery team".. assuming said team actually exist.
Posted by: GoTribe | December 01, 2008 at 04:38 PM
what about butler for escobar? jw or would they consider guillen????????
Posted by: RoyalsandMariners51 | December 01, 2008 at 04:41 PM
Just as much as teahen for Escobar straight up doesn't work, Grienke for escobar straight up doesn't either.
I think the royals would/should be looking for Peavy lite type of package for Grienke.
Posted by: basicslop | December 01, 2008 at 04:42 PM
peavy costs to much we would have to throw in guillen if we did that deal. anyway that wont happen. heres an idea keep!!! grienke
Posted by: RoyalsandMariners51 | December 01, 2008 at 04:45 PM
No, Escobar for Grienke is clearly much, much more realistic than Teahen for Escobar. I never said it should be a one for one deal, but the Royals don't really have anything the Braves would consider moving Escobar for other than Grienke. The only other real valuable commodities the Royals have that are ML ready are 1B/DH types (i.e. Butler) that are of no use to the Braves, who already have Kotchman with Flowers and Freeman as possibilities down the road. I guess Carlos Rosa could be interesting in the right package, but I don't see much else.
Posted by: nixa37 | December 01, 2008 at 04:53 PM
By the way, wouldn't Escobar plus a prospect or two be the exact definition of a Peavy-lite type of package.
Posted by: nixa37 | December 01, 2008 at 04:55 PM
Could it be a potential Mike Lowell trade? Furcal to short, Lowrie to 3rd if they cant sign Texiera too..just saying
Posted by: Kramerica Industries | December 01, 2008 at 05:15 PM
yes it would be Peavy- lite but you didn't say anything about prospects.
Still i think a Braves Royals deal is last case scenerio for the Braves.
Posted by: basicslop | December 01, 2008 at 05:18 PM
Sorry for not making that more clear. I generally think its kind of pointless to discuss secondary pieces in theoretical discussions like this. My point was a deal centered around Escobar for Grienke should at least get the Royals thinking about what else they'd need to compete a deal.
Posted by: nixa37 | December 01, 2008 at 05:31 PM
Theo Epstein is staying away from the shortstop position, he knows better. Lowrie wil be starting, at least he didn't make 3 errors in one inning.
Posted by: Cyyoung | December 01, 2008 at 05:49 PM
I kind of get the feeling lowrie is the type of player the sox would like to deal but they may have waited too long. He is never going to be a very good defensive shortstop. At the same time I highly doubt the sox management will be the high bidder for furcals services. If he wants to win and signs for a competitive offer he could be quite a deal.
Posted by: walkoffblast | December 01, 2008 at 05:59 PM
This is the first I'm hearing about any Escobar+ for Grienke deal. Is Grienke officially available?
Posted by: drphonic7 | December 01, 2008 at 06:00 PM
I doubt Grienke is officially available, but if the Royals are truly interested in Escobar its tough to think of anyone the Braves would find intriguing on the Royals other than Grienke. I guess a big part of it is what DM thinks of his chances to resign Grienke.
Posted by: nixa37 | December 01, 2008 at 06:16 PM
Gee for a bad defensive shortstop no errors all year and playoffs. Made majors in less than 3 years after being a first round draft pick. Teams would jump at the chance of a 25 year old switch hitting shortstop. Had 49 rbi's in 81 games for a rookie, yeah Jrff Lowrie is a bum.
Posted by: Cyyoung | December 01, 2008 at 06:58 PM
Lugo and Furcal, what something like 19 million dollar in the shortstop position, who is going to trade for Lugo. Jason Stark is dreaming.
Posted by: Cyyoung | December 01, 2008 at 07:10 PM
Furcal to the Red Sox makes little sense. They would be better off spending the money on extending Beckett or signing Youk/Pedroia to long term deals.
If Lowrie stinks up the joint next year they will either have Lugo to platoon with him or if they trade Lugo, there should be plenty of opportunity to deal for an equally mediocre SS like Khalil Greene or Bobby Crosby. Not to mention if the Astros struggle I expect they will put Tejada on the block too (as he is a free agent after the season).
Basically, there should be plenty of backup options for the Sox if Lowrie struggles so it doesn't make sense they spend the money on locking into a long term deal with Furcal.
Posted by: KangarooBoxer26 | December 01, 2008 at 08:40 PM
I believe that the cardinals will make a play for Furcal after the meetings. It would be a move that will give the birds a lead-off batter, additional speed on the base paths, and power. They do have the money to get this done. An infield of Pujols-1st, Furcal-SS, Glaus-3B and Lopez/Miles 2B would be one of the, if not the best in the majors. It's time to open the wallet.
Posted by: Ray Ray | December 01, 2008 at 11:55 PM
The Royals have not said that Greinke is available. Rumors are being tossed out of the left field like crazy though because of the question marks on his contract.
Dejesus for Escobar?
Posted by: royalswin | December 02, 2008 at 04:24 PM
i believe that the Red sox the need lead-off batter like furcal
Posted by: francisco | December 07, 2008 at 05:03 PM