![]() |
|
|
| |
« Fantasy: Ramon Hernandez-Ryan Freel Swap | Main | Orioles Working To Trade Daniel Cabrera »
According to ESPN's Jerry Crasnick, the Yankees reached a preliminary agreement with A.J. Burnett on a five-year, $82.5MM deal ($16.5MM per year on average). The deal is pending a physical, and some final terms must be hammered out. The Blue Jays will receive the Yankees' second-round pick in next year's draft, plus a supplemental pick.
That's $243.5MM spent by the Yankees on starting pitching, unless C.C. Sabathia opts out. The Braves will have to figure out a Plan B.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e201053657d106970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Yankees Sign A.J. Burnett:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
dominican i'm aware of that :-) just saying hes bought like any other player due to that. I'd say if Manny resigns a dodger, the dodgers "bought" Manny. they got a half season of boston's contract and then bought their own contract. It is possible to accept the option and say sorry i'm not signing you to a 50 million dollar deal.
Posted by: Santana/Beckett FTW | December 12, 2008 at 06:50 PM
I am not a red sox fan btw im a mets fan and i am not arguing anything im just stating how far off topic these threads have become and i happened to use your name as an example because Babe Ruth was brought up in one of your posts.
Posted by: Rolling{Night}Hawk{09} | December 12, 2008 at 06:51 PM
TimeToGetReal instead of a palace we prefer to refer to the new stadium as a Deathstar
Posted by: Casanova Wong | December 12, 2008 at 06:51 PM
What kind of argument is that? It haunted them for 86 years...good grief. Santana/Beckett is right. You're the reason I hate Yankees fans. And unlike Red Sox fans, I have other teams to hate, say for instance the Sillies.
Posted by: metsobsessed | December 12, 2008 at 06:53 PM
Santan/BeckettFTW, I only bring this up as part of my original argument that the yankees can overspend BECUASE of there sucesse. Of coure NYC is a great place for a ball club, but there were 2 other teams ther before them and they have outlasted both of them.
I was the first person to tell Yanks fans to stop defending out Payroll. I was mereley explaining why we can do what we do.
And its funny that I'm the reason you hate Yankees fans, because youre the reason I hate Red Sox fans! Does that in some weird twisted way makes us friends???
Posted by: GeneseoMC20 | December 12, 2008 at 06:55 PM
everybody who knows baseball knows that babe ruth was sold to the yankees by the red sox thus leading to the red sox famous 86 year world series drought (the curse of the bambino) which was broken in 2004 when the red sox came back from 3-0 to take the pennant and later on sweep the cards for the world series. if i dont know about babe ruth like you dumbly stated for some reason, then how would i possibly know that the last out made by edgar renteria was symbolic because he was wearing number 3 the number the babe wore.
Posted by: Rolling{Night}Hawk{09} | December 12, 2008 at 06:56 PM
Ah..the Mother of All Chokes. Good times.
Posted by: metsobsessed | December 12, 2008 at 06:58 PM
@YanksFan
regardless of your 1 player stat you came up with. My position still stands; and that is this: Every player that wishes to play in MLB should have to come in through the draft. Every team should have equal footing on all players, regardless of what academy they may or may not have and where it may or may not be.
I have another stat for you, just to show you the polar opposite of your argument. Well, i guess its not really a stat, just a name. Dice-K. The RedSox got him because they could afford it. Very few teams could have at that price.
___________________________
Dude...what 1 player stat are you talking about? W/ the exception of the Japaneese players almost all international players are signing for peanuts compared to what the top draft players sign for.
Japaneese, and to an extent, Cuban leagues are considered professional leagues so most of the players coming from their command more money because they're not your average "ameatures". It's not fair to include them into a draft. if you're Ichiro Suzuki, Hideki Matsui or Dice K or (ugggh) Kei Igawa you are an established star already. You're already making millions. There's no "fair" way of integrating them into the draft. If a team like the Pirate sign Ichiro what are they going to pay them? Are they suppose to make league minimum for 6 years? By that time they'll be damn near 35.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 12, 2008 at 06:58 PM
i say if they yankees win cashmans a genious if they don't win fire him
Posted by: nyydb13 | December 12, 2008 at 06:58 PM
i say if they yankees win cashmans a genious if they don't win fire him
Posted by: nyydb13 | December 12, 2008 at 06:58 PM
metsobsessed if tht cubs would not give up derosa in a deal for peavy, why would they trade for some one worse than derosa in that package. Derosa isn't going anywhere, Lou already was upset that he was even mentioned. HE may not be the best player but he is a great teamplayer and can move around while playing at a good level
Posted by: bobby p | December 12, 2008 at 06:59 PM
and you're right on abreau btw. i can admit when i'm wrong about a player.
however that doesn't change the other players that have followed the pattern.
Posted by: Santana/Beckett FTW | December 12, 2008 at 06:59 PM
Let me recap for you all
Santana/Beckette said:
" genesomc20 sadly its not their success that brought them the money. its the city of NY. New York and boston are huge baseball cities. their moneys not goin anywhere, even if they finish in last for a few years. "
and I said NO, thats not true The Yankees were the third tieam to lay ground in New York and now the other 2 teams before them are gone so it was more than just location.
Then Beckett said I was wrong about that.
btw.. I wasnt wrong about that.
Posted by: GeneseoMC20 | December 12, 2008 at 06:59 PM
Yeah, bobby p, that's why I wanted him. That now is a moot point, as the Mets have dealt Schoeneweis to Arizona for minor league pitcher Connor Robertson. Salary dump to clear space for Mr. Lowe? Stay tuned...
Posted by: metsobsessed | December 12, 2008 at 07:01 PM
Metsobsessed i understand where your coming from but as mets fans on a yankees thread i dont think we should be arguing about chokes because currently we are in no position to do so. you just sometimes have to give in and give credit where credit is due. in this case i applaud the yankees for not being content with there team and signing the 2 best pitchers on the market. big improvements from rasner and ponson for sure.
Posted by: Rolling{Night}Hawk{09} | December 12, 2008 at 07:02 PM
LOL geneseo. yes it does! i'm from NJ, 35 minutes from yankees stadium. if that makes you hate me any more.
Posted by: Santana/Beckett FTW | December 12, 2008 at 07:03 PM
I swear to God, you have all diverged so far from the orginal argument, that we dont even have an argument anymore.
I have metobsessed bringing up 2004,
I have Nighthawk bringing up random facts bout Ruths jersey number
and I have Santana, the one man who should remember what we were talking about gangF**cking me with his two new buddies.
Posted by: GeneseoMC20 | December 12, 2008 at 07:04 PM
http://www.nj.com/mets/index.ssf/2008/12/mets_send_reliever_schoeneweis.html
Mets have traded away Schoenweis to Arizona for Connor Robertson. If im not mistaken he is the brother of yankees reliever Dave Robertson who displayed nice stuff when he pitched against the Mets a few month ago.
Posted by: Rolling{Night}Hawk{09} | December 12, 2008 at 07:04 PM
dominican i'm aware of that :-) just saying hes bought like any other player due to that. I'd say if Manny resigns a dodger, the dodgers "bought" Manny. they got a half season of boston's contract and then bought their own contract. It is possible to accept the option and say sorry i'm not signing you to a 50 million dollar deal.
______________________
Ugghh...The Yanks did not agree to pick up his option as part of the trade. He was traded , flat out and in winter of 07 the Yanks had the choice of picking up the option or paying him a $2 mil buyout. It's not that hard people.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 12, 2008 at 07:05 PM
GeneseoMC20
LOL that was a funny comment i too have no idea where the argument is going.
Posted by: Rolling{Night}Hawk{09} | December 12, 2008 at 07:06 PM
Besides they just posted that Scott Schoenweis was traded to arizona for Connor Robertson, a 27-year-old righty.
He only made nine major league appearences this yea and has a 3.30 career minor league era. Yeah Schoenweis and a prospect are worth Derosa alright
Posted by: bobby p | December 12, 2008 at 07:06 PM
sorry a little late on the posting
Posted by: bobby p | December 12, 2008 at 07:07 PM
Hahahaha. Aww man the animosity is killing me!
Posted by: GeneseoMC20 | December 12, 2008 at 07:08 PM
The yankees have the best pitching staff in baseball
CC JOBA SET UP MAN
AJ MARINO CLOSER
WANG
ANDY
HUGHES ALOTS OF HATERS
I CAN SEE IY NOW
Posted by: orlando fabian | December 12, 2008 at 07:10 PM
This whole argurment was originally about AJ right? We touched on so many different spin offs...lol.
Bottom line is the Yanks did nothing illegel and I hope AJ stays healthy and productive.
As a fan I want to thank the Yanks for putting their money up to get the players we needed. Let's get either Sheets or Pettite and maybe another bat if possible. 2 months to go until spring training.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 12, 2008 at 07:11 PM
No Yanksfan unfortunatley it was just another debate about our Money situation.
I guess thats what happens when AJ Burnett has a 400 comment page.
Posted by: GeneseoMC20 | December 12, 2008 at 07:14 PM
hey yanksfansince78:
for once i agree with you
this is about AJ and i happen to have liked AJ Burnett before he put on pinstripes. I hope for his careers sake he is successful. hes a great pitcher and a good pickup for the yanks. anyone can admit that.
its the years and dollars that concern me.
Posted by: Santana/Beckett FTW | December 12, 2008 at 07:16 PM
Guys it’s been real but its Friday night and I have to go kill all my remaining brain cells with alcohol.
Well at least the ones not retaining any information for my last Final.
I hope we can continue ripping each other apart in the future.
Posted by: GeneseoMC20 | December 12, 2008 at 07:17 PM
only reason i brought up other players is to set a trend. not to offend yankees fans.
Posted by: Santana/Beckett FTW | December 12, 2008 at 07:17 PM
AMEN GENESEO! see u at teh bar!
Posted by: Santana/Beckett FTW | December 12, 2008 at 07:17 PM
@YanksFan
The one stat i was referring to was your mention of one international signing. And yes all players should have to go through the draft. If a team feels they cannot sign a potential draftee due to them wanting a larger contract, then they pass, just like they do now. And just because the signings of these players is relatively small, doesnt do anything to help your argument. In fact it takes away from your argument because these players would have the potential to earn much more money via the draft they do would by signing as a FA. If they arent talented, then they will fall into the lower rounds, just like everyone else.
Posted by: sjdurfey | December 12, 2008 at 07:21 PM
WOW ITS DAY 1 AND BURNETT ALREADY HAS MORE COMMENTS THAN SABATHIA'S DOES!!!
Posted by: Rolling{Night}Hawk{09} | December 12, 2008 at 07:27 PM
Good God the Yankees love signing long-term, lucrative deals. As if the baseball world didn't learn from the Giants-Zito deal.
Apparently the NYY are imune to the Economic hardships facing other teams.
"New York Yankees: best team money can buy"
Posted by: thered86 | December 12, 2008 at 07:59 PM
Yankees rotation With Pettitte
1-C.C Sabathia
2-A.J Burnett
3-C.M Wang
4-Chamberlain
5-Pettitte
Yankees rotation With Lowe
1-C.C Sabathia
2-A.J Burnett
3-C.M Wang
4-D.Lowe
5-Chamberlain
Posted by: addymaster04 | December 12, 2008 at 08:24 PM
I am a lifelong Yankees fan that tries to remain objective. On paper the rotation looks great but as we all know, championships are not won on paper. I like the CC signing. I am still skeptical about Burnett but I know he can be good IF he remains healthy. I hear two big reasons Burnett chose the Yankees (because the $$ offered by both teams was similar) are: Burnett wont have to be the ace in NY. In Atlanta he would have to be so actually the pressure in NY could be less. the second reason is his wife. They live in Baltimore and she refuses to fly. She can take a 3 hour train ride to see him in NY so geography had a lot to do with the decision. I have a question for Braves fans or anyone in the know. Why is there so much talk about Smoltz possibly to Boston or Detroit? Why aren't the Braves trying to re-sign him?
Posted by: EmpireStrkesBack | December 12, 2008 at 08:48 PM
Do all you people who are complaining about the yankees spending on free agents realize that as of right now they are 45 million less than last years payroll. The spendig is not over yet and next year there is another 26 million coming off between Damon and Matsui.
Posted by: kwhitey | December 12, 2008 at 08:48 PM
I favor the first rotation personally addymaster because Pettitte is home grown and there are a lot of nice pitchers in the free agent market next year as well. Since Pettitte comes on a 1 year deal maybe next season the Yankees get one of them if Hughes doesnt pan out (which in my opinion after seeing Pelfry as bad as he was become really good Hughes should become an ace with the dominant stuff when healthy he possesses every time he hits the mound.
Posted by: Rolling{Night}Hawk{09} | December 12, 2008 at 08:52 PM
Also, the more the Yankee spend, the more they have to pay out to small market teams for the luxury tax. For those that do whine, please stop. Spending huge dollars guarantees nothing. If the low budget Rays can do it, anybody can. There is more parity currently in baseball than I can ever remember. I suggest that small market teams use the luxury tax money they get from the Yanks, Sox, Mets, etc wisely.
Posted by: EmpireStrkesBack | December 12, 2008 at 08:53 PM
The Yankees are not immune. That's why they didn't offer arbitration to guys like Abreu, Pettitte, Giambi, etc. They didnt want a third party negotiating for them. If they were going to re-sign their free agents, they wanted to set the price. The Yankees are less affected it seems because their owners have so many other lucrative businesses.
Posted by: EmpireStrkesBack | December 12, 2008 at 09:01 PM
good jobs to the yanks for signing AJ. cant wait to see him on the DL. hope the yankees have a backup plan when AJ is on the dl. mayby they will have learned since last year.
Posted by: HandsHannon | December 12, 2008 at 09:02 PM
Why are some of you guys hoping these guys land on the DL? That's sour grapes. I hate the Red Sox but I dont hope any of their players get hurt. Please remember, all of these players are people, human beings. Its terrible to wish injury or malice against anyone.
Posted by: EmpireStrkesBack | December 12, 2008 at 09:04 PM
nobody wants anyone to get hurt. we just say hes more likely to get hurt. no thats out of the way. i got 30$ that burnett will be out by june.
Posted by: HandsHannon | December 12, 2008 at 09:12 PM
@YanksFan
The one stat i was referring to was your mention of one international signing. And yes all players should have to go through the draft. If a team feels they cannot sign a potential draftee due to them wanting a larger contract, then they pass, just like they do now. And just because the signings of these players is relatively small, doesnt do anything to help your argument. In fact it takes away from your argument because these players would have the potential to earn much more money via the draft they do would by signing as a FA. If they arent talented, then they will fall into the lower rounds, just like everyone else.
__________________________
I don't agree. I think a foreign player should be treated like a free agent and allowed to sign with whoever they want. Maybe you can make a rule specficially for the Japaneese league but that's it. You implement a draft for international players and then you do to things. a) latin ball players would have to wait until their 18 in order to enter the draft to make it fair to the US born ameatures. b) signing money for a lot of the US players would dwindle down because of more competition.
The only foreign player pool that really commands a lot of money that might be "unfair" to some of the small market low budget teams would be the Japaneese league. But most of those players are star caliber player's well above the typical age for most draftees. And most have to commit to playing a certain amount of years before they can attempt to leave for the US. So if the average player who's put in his required years to their home team is 28 then how fair is it for them to be put into a draft and then be at the mercy of the team that signs them? And if the amount is considered low, then what? Wait until the next year? There's no perfect system but the current one is the monst balanced for the mlb teams, the japaneese teams who are losing talent and the japaneese/international players, IMO.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 12, 2008 at 09:17 PM
EmpireStrikesBack
I cant agree with you more, people tend to forget than they are wishing injury and pain on ACTUAL HUMAN BEINGS when they say they cant wait to see them on the dl. Thats just absurd and although it is there opinion i too feel strongly about how nobody realizes these are actually people who they are wishing malice like u used against them.
Posted by: Rolling{Night}Hawk{09} | December 12, 2008 at 09:18 PM
than=that*
Posted by: Rolling{Night}Hawk{09} | December 12, 2008 at 09:20 PM
Ok that makes more sense. I wouldnt bet against a DL stint or two but I hope not. One thing I do think is the Yankees will have good pitching depth if someone does get hurt for a little while. We had to piece a rotation together with glue, bubble gum, and paper clips. Giese, Hughes, and Kennedy (if they are still around) would all be capable stopgaps.
Posted by: EmpireStrkesBack | December 12, 2008 at 09:24 PM
The final two signings I would like to see are Pettitte, and Manny...yes Manny. I got so tired seeing the Yankees get runners in scoring position with less than two out and scoring one run or less. The clutch hitting was pathetic. Manny is one of the best clutch hitters in the game. Also, it seems he instantly makes the guy hitting in front of him a better hitter. Put him behind A-Rod in the lineup and that should help him. Oh and I forgot, it will be 2009, an odd number year. Maybe another MVP for A-Rod, hopefully it will be a postseason MVP.
Posted by: EmpireStrkesBack | December 12, 2008 at 09:32 PM
I'm torn between wanting Sheets and Pettite. Part of me thinks it might be better to go with Pettite because he's maybe a little more dependable health wise and would be a nice 1 year stop gap until Hughes is ready to start. I think that for organizational pride it's important to give him a chance. That may sound stupid but maybe it'll send a message to the young guys that we reward rookies who show they have talent.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 12, 2008 at 09:56 PM
In some ways I think we leaned too much on Pettitte last year. He was basically our #2 starter for most of the year when in reality at this stage of his career he is a #4 or 5. I would love to re-sign him. He is a Yankee. But he has to realize that $16M is too much for 14-14 with a 4.5 era for a guy who is closer to 40 than 30. Besides, I dont know if he would get much more than $10M anywhere else. He could end his career where he started it, help open up the new stadium, and hopefully have a chance to get to the post season.
Posted by: EmpireStrkesBack | December 12, 2008 at 10:03 PM
All Non-Yankee Fans:
I predicted this and much more and non-yankee fans said, "another case of a yankee fan thinking they are entitled to everybody they want. CC will not be a yankee. Money can't buy championships.", citron1616, Dec.16, 2008 at 3:05PM.
I simply answered $ talks and BS walks.
Now let's see CC is a hmmm
Yankee, Burnett is a hmmmmm Yankee, next Sheets and/or Pettitte - or Joba starts and and Joba relieves. If both no Teixeira or Manny, if one probably Tex unless the he hates Arod rumors are true then Manny.
Yanks will get offense too:
Oh yeah on November 8, 2008 at 11:47AM I predicted CC, Burnett, Pettitte/Lowe/Mussina (2 of 3)and Joba or sign Sheets too and Joba goes back to the bullpen.
Lineup
Damon CF
Jeter SS
Ramirez LF
Teixeira 1B
ARod 3B
Matsui DH
Posada C
Cano 2B
Read it and weep non- yank fans.
Posted by: yanksrule | December 12, 2008 at 10:19 PM
I think Tex goes to Boston or Washingon. They seem to want him more. He would be a really good pick up for Boston especially with the uncertainty around Lowell. If I was Tex I would go to Boston. He will still make plenty of money and hasa better chance to win there. I wont say theres no chance to win in Washington because this tme last year, most of us thought there was no chance for the Rays. Personally, I would rather have Manny, but that would only add to the log jam of corner outfielders.
Posted by: EmpireStrkesBack | December 12, 2008 at 10:27 PM
Oh and btw Yanksrule, Damon in center would not be good for us. He needs to stay in left. We need to get a good arm in center. Melky saved us some runs throwing out runnes on base. Damon throws like a 3 year old girl.
Posted by: EmpireStrkesBack | December 12, 2008 at 10:29 PM
I would prefer Ankiel, Melky, or Cameron (don't really like this trade but he is a gold glove caliber CF...at least thats what Buck Martinez told me). Edmonds is on his last leg. I dont care how good he was with the Cubs. Yankee Stadium centerfield is a little too big for him.
Posted by: EmpireStrkesBack | December 12, 2008 at 10:37 PM
I am sorry to jump in on an AJ thread and change topic but I have to add my pre tax $.02 worth.
First if AJ is healthy this is a great signing. He has great stuff and will be a asset. But there is the word IF. I am not going to get in to health as its been covered in the previous 475 posts..
I just have to comment about payroll disparity and specifically 3 comments.
First:
About Carl Polhad and the Minnesota Twins. Yes he may have a personal fortune but why should he have to spend his personal money on his team. He has a small market, not much in the way of TV/Radio revenue, and they still spent 62 M last year, which was 7th lowest but they are in I think the third smallest market. I know payroll will increase with the new stadium. (as it should) But please don’t bash the guy because he isn't in this to lose money. The Twins payroll is I imagine pretty much inline with their revenue, including the sharing money they get. I honestly think the Twins are one of the best run franchises in baseball. Now the Marlins are a different story.
Second:
There was a comment earlier but I don’t want to try to find it in this mess, but someone was complaining that KC paid 9M to Farnsworth to close for them. They suggested that they spend it more on draft signings. I can’t say I agree. When your payroll for the MLB roster is 58 M if you pay 9M for draft picks that aren’t proven your risking a lot more than say the Yankees/Cubs/Mets/Red Sox. Those teams can afford to take a flyer on a draftee and pay a signing bonus because the have a significant amount more income and can afford them not to pan out. I think the Royals are better off drafting someone they know they can sign than pay some of the bonuses that are going to some of these unproven kids.
Finally:
Someone earlier said that it’s better to pay the players than the owners getting rich (Cubs25 or someone like that). That is true however the owners are always going to make money so the more the players make the more the tickets cost etc.. pretty soon (um now?) it starts to get out of hand. I am also in agreement that there should be a hard cap and a hard bottom for payroll.
Again this is just my pre tax $.02 worth. Sorry to interrupt your regularly scheduled thread of Yankee/Sox Bashing…
Posted by: Bleacher_Buddha | December 12, 2008 at 10:51 PM
As a Yankee fan who knows the Steinbrenners have money, I appreciate that they want to spend it by trying to field a competetive team every year. When there is a good product on the field, I do not mind paying the exta money to make it to Yankees games. Obviously, not many Yankees fans mind because the stadium is always packed. By the way, not sure if it is true or not (and this is not a bash by any means), but I hear Boston has the highest ticket prices in the majors. This is a combination of payroll and having a ballpark that seats just over 30,000. Please correct me if I am wrong.
Posted by: EmpireStrkesBack | December 12, 2008 at 10:57 PM
Congrats Yankees on pickup up a now legitimate #2 starter to go with CC and now if hopefully Wang is healthy, a #3 to form a strong 1,2,3 rotation now for opposing teams to contend with. 1 more signee for the rotation would be nice to allow Chamberlain to go back to the BP so his 5-6 inning starts will not hurt the BP for the rest of the rotation, but that is another matter entirely.
Now that Taveras has been non tendered, could he possibly be looked at to add a tinge of speed to the Yankees? He would be much cheaper and an improvement over Cameron and not bring HGH back to the Yanks now that Giambi and petite seem to be gone?
Posted by: johns | December 12, 2008 at 11:01 PM
I dont think Pettitte is gone. Tavares does have more speed than Cameron but Cameron did have 17 steals which isnt bad. But Im sure Taveras would be cheaper. I saw where the Yankees had a fleeting interest in trading for Taveras but now he is a free agent. We're not worried about Cameron and HGH. All that stuff with Pettitte and Giambi is water under the bridge. Te MLB is doing their best to get it all cleaned up.
Posted by: EmpireStrkesBack | December 12, 2008 at 11:06 PM
Te=The
Posted by: EmpireStrkesBack | December 12, 2008 at 11:07 PM
I would omgasm at a rotation of
C.C
Wang
Brunett
Sheets
Joba
Posted by: Gleb | December 12, 2008 at 11:07 PM
Make sure you wrap it up lol
Posted by: EmpireStrkesBack | December 12, 2008 at 11:11 PM
I could see it now the new york yankees
with that great pitching staff in the playoffs
I am so happy right now no boston fan can't say anything to me.
Posted by: orlando fabian | December 12, 2008 at 11:37 PM
The Braves may as well blow Sheets away with an offer to make sure they obtain him.
Sheets/Vazquez/Jurrjens to start out with ..Then when Hudson comes back healthy, and when Hanson is ready to make an impact - Not bad at all.
With the Braves tight budget, may turn out better to give Sheets something like 3/40-42 rather than AJ for 5/82.5. Less committment, less money.
Posted by: LG2400 | December 13, 2008 at 12:14 AM
I wonder if the Brews will do right by their fans and use that $100 mill to snatch up two or three or for that matter 4 FA players. I wonder if they have enough minor league depth to enter the Peavy fiasco?
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 13, 2008 at 12:36 AM
Actually that would be a real good testament to how serious they are about contending or was the offer to CC just for appearances? What reason would they have to not go after a combo of Sheets, Perez or maybe guys like Randy Johnson, Jon Garland, Pedro Martinez or Brad Penny?
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 13, 2008 at 12:38 AM
I usually get towards the end of a huge post and decide its utterly retarted to argue with some of the people on here. No matter how much sense you make, they are just so content with being ignorant.
So, let me try to break this down as quickly as possible.
The Yankees and Mets are the richest teams in their respective leagues for one reason. Not a century of success, or mystical blues and oranges. Simply, they both operate out of the largest media center IN THE ENTIRE WORLD.
Not only that, but they shell off a gigantic portion of their TV revenue to the rest of the league. Upwards of 25-40% I believe. Forget the physical revenue sharing in regards to a teams payroll. The rest of the league gets paid in gobs of cash because of these teams success. Contracts have only skyrocketed because the teams can afford them. Anyone who thinks teams like the nationals are suffering so bad apparently aren't paying attention to them offering an astronimical contract to tex.
Try to look at MLB much like the world economy. The american dollar may be on the downslide, but will always be a major player on the world stage. The rest of the world cannot exist without the amount of revenue generated by the american consumer. Stop being so closed minded. When Bobby Boner of Kansas City decides to take the Boner Bunch out for a family night at Kauffman because they're Yankee fans and they yanks are in town, they don't just take a tally at the door as to who you're here to see and divide the money up later amongst the two teams. Much like America is to the world, the yankees are to major league baseball. Not only are they making mediocre teams contenders, but they're probably keeping a few teams in existance right now.
Go take your anti-capitalist BS and move to France. While there you can root for the Marlins and piss on the american flag.
We're a capitalist country who is supposed to praise those who actually rise above the rest and put visible distance between them and the competition.
Before you decide to take the sheepish movement and try to kill the big guy, try to educate yourself first. You might find out that the big guy does more for you alive than dead.
Posted by: Dave | December 13, 2008 at 12:39 AM
So what your saying is "You all a bunch of f**kin' **holes. You know why? You don't have the guts to be what you wanna be (A contender)? You need people like the Yanks. You need people like them so you can point your f**kin' fingers and say, "That's the bad guy." So... what that make you? Good? You're not good. You just know how to hide, how to lie. Me, I don't have that problem. Me, I always tell the truth. Even when I lie. So say good night to the bad guy! Come on (CC). The last time you gonna see a bad guy like this again, let me tell you. Come on (AJ). Make way for the bad guy. There's a bad guy comin' through! Better get outta his way!
(Cashman staggers out of the Balladgio dining room, w/ check book in hand as the music quietly plays off...with CC and Burnett in stride behind him).
¿Dónde diablos es Scott Boras? Necesito me limpiar un bateador!
Translation: Where the hell is Scott Boras? I need me a clean up hitter!
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 13, 2008 at 12:55 AM
As for the actual article, of course the contract is a bit overblown. 90% of the FAs for years now have gone to the highest bidder. Sure, you can state the oddballs where players took less to play near home, but they're few and far between. If Tex got offered 15/500 to play for an alaskan expansion team, I bet he'd take it.
If the Yankees got AJ at 5/100 it would be absurd. The contract they got him at was simply them paying what the market dictated. The sox shelling out twice the 2nd place bid for Dice-K was a bit absurd. The Yankees tossing a few extra mil ontop of a 5 year pact is really nothing. Actually it was pretty astute of them to not go wastefully far above the braves offer.
As far as the rotation goes, any fan who wants sheets at this point obviously doesn't have much in the department of baseball smarts. I'd rather we look like this
L- C.C
R- Wang
R- Burnett
L- Pettite
R- Hughes
Move Joba to the pen for godsake. I've heard many yankee fans rumbling "why move a bred starter with 3 + pitches to the pen?".
Simply, because we did it with a guy named Mariano and it worked out pretty well. Pitching 7 inning games with that rotation sounds pretty good to me.
On a somewhat related sidenote. I would really like to make an MLBTR readers poll for 2 things.
1) The amount of readers who have played at or above the High School level.
2) The amount of readers who have taken and actually passed any sort of class regarding economics.
Posted by: Dave | December 13, 2008 at 12:55 AM
I played HS but my degree is in PoliSci...I did stay at a Holiday Inn last night. Does that count for anything?
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 13, 2008 at 01:08 AM
If the Yankees win the World Series, Yankee haters are going to say they only won because they had money and bought their championship
If the Yankees don't win the World Series, they are going to laugh and say spending all that money and buing players doesn't win championships
How does it go both ways in that case?
I'm aware not every Yankee hater on here says that, but there are plenty that would (Some I know are smart, some are not smart.....and sorry to say, but the same goes for Yankee fans......I'm not considering myself better though lol)
Posted by: mike923 | December 13, 2008 at 01:14 AM
I think if the Brewers are smart they'll take $35 mil of the $100 they were ready to drop on CC and try to resign Sheets and maybe add the Unit on a 1 year deal. If not then it's a good example of an owner stashing the cash back into his pocket which would probably be followed by trading Fielder or Hardy away.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 13, 2008 at 01:20 AM
Anyone excited by the Yankees starting pitching is deluded. Wang's future is uncertain. Joba has not proven he can pitch the innings. Do any contenders in the AL fear Hughes on the mound in October? Did (most likely pickup) Pettite look like 80% of his former self last year? Then what about next year...60%? And now to the BIG signings. Everyone acts like the only question mark with Burnett is his health. I think they're confusing him with Harden. Burnett gets wild often and also gets overamped when the heat is on. Won't that be a major problem in playoffs? And CC? I don't think anyone has mentioned yet how CC has pitched in his five postseason starts. 25 IP, 7.92 ERA, 22W, 24K, 33H and, if any of you watched those games, about 100 pitches every three innings. That's not what you want from your ace in October, is it? If you had to pick one pitcher from mlb to start Game 7 of the WS for you, would it be CC? Would CC even be in the top five? Top ten?
I'm not saying the Yankees are doomed or that they suck. But they aren't built for a championship. No one on that staff will simply take a WS game and shut down an opponent. And to win in October, you need two guys who dominate.
Posted by: paxterj | December 13, 2008 at 04:09 AM
I am laughing my butt off a the scores of Yankee haters coming out of the woodwork.
If Burnett had gone to the Braves these same people would be saying things like,
"Oh the Braves got themselves a top notch #1 starter and stole a one of the premiere pitchers of the day from the Yankees!"
Now they say,
"Oh he's injury prone anyway, damn the Yankees they're all big stupid heads!"
HAHAHA!
Listen, I am a Yankee fan---obviously.
And I hold no delusions about Burnett's history or his health.
All I can say is, given our past few years we've had more than our share of injuries so I'm used to it. Burnett at least gives us an ace-caliber pitcher who so long as he stays healthy gives us in essence 2 aces followed by a strong #2 pitcher in Wang.
I would feel better if we signed Petitte and or Sheets as well that would let us keep Chamberlain in the pen. I am very much enticed by the prospect of a Marte-Chamberlain-Rivera bullpen.
Posted by: lekman | December 13, 2008 at 07:53 AM
"Now that Taveras has been non tendered, could he possibly be looked at to add a tinge of speed to the Yankees? "
We already have Gardner for the no hit all-speed slot and just non-tendered Christian who was another Tavares clone.
Cameron can hit a bit and if the price is just Melky, that's not bad.
Posted by: NJYankeeFan | December 13, 2008 at 08:19 AM
"Move Joba to the pen for godsake. I've heard many yankee fans rumbling "why move a bred starter with 3 + pitches to the pen?".
Simply, because we did it with a guy named Mariano and it worked out pretty well. Pitching 7 inning games with that rotation sounds pretty good to me."
Uh. Mo has 1 pitch. Joba has 4. We just paid 161MM for an ace. 82.5MM for a #3.
The Mets picked up a top notch closer for $37MM.
Anyone who thinks Joba will not develop into at least an AJ Burnett level starter does not have much baseball knowledge.
In today's market that is twice the value of a top closer.
Posted by: NJYankeeFan | December 13, 2008 at 08:22 AM
is there sand up everyone's hoo-has? we be lowering payroll.
Posted by: ArodMVP217 | December 13, 2008 at 09:44 AM
cbyankeefan13-
It's sulking is what it is.
It's the mentality of
"Well, we didn't want him anyway! I'm going home!"
If all these rumors about Peavy and the Yankees are true, I'm going to begin counting down to opening day right now. Can you imagine?
Sabathia
Peavy
Burnett
Wang
Petitte
And this will not increase our payroll beyond what it already was. We dropped Pavano, Giambi, Abreu, and Mussina, each of whom had very hefty salaries. This will bring us back to where we were last year or maybe a bit above.
Posted by: lekman | December 13, 2008 at 10:19 AM
I assume they would not resign Pettite then but put Joba in at 5.
Posted by: NJYankeeFan | December 13, 2008 at 10:29 AM
I really can't understand why people are so against Joba being a starter? The only question about him is can he handle the innings? The only way to answer that is to play him and see. The Yanks are going to put him out there for 150 innings. He has always been a starter and was drafted in 06 as a starter. He has 4 really good pitches and it would be a waste. Plus we have a really good bullpen and viable 7th inning guys in Bruney and Ramirez tow guys who were drafted as closers in RObertson and Melcanon. Putting Joba in the bullpen would be redundant. I think a staff of:
CC
Burnett
Wang
Pettite or Sheets
Joba
Rivera
Bruney (R)
Ramirez (R)
Robertson (R)
Coke (L)
Marte(L)
with Melcanon, Albarajedo, Veras and Sanchez in the waiting looks pretty good. Very deep bullpen as it is.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 13, 2008 at 11:43 AM
Anyone excited by the Yankees starting pitching is deluded. Wang's future is uncertain. Joba has not proven he can pitch the innings. Do any contenders in the AL fear Hughes on the mound in October? Did (most likely pickup) Pettite look like 80% of his former self last year? Then what about next year...60%? And now to the BIG signings. Everyone acts like the only question mark with Burnett is his health. I think they're confusing him with Harden. Burnett gets wild often and also gets overamped when the heat is on. Won't that be a major problem in playoffs? And CC? I don't think anyone has mentioned yet how CC has pitched in his five postseason starts. 25 IP, 7.92 ERA, 22W, 24K, 33H and, if any of you watched those games, about 100 pitches every three innings. That's not what you want from your ace in October, is it? If you had to pick one pitcher from mlb to start Game 7 of the WS for you, would it be CC? Would CC even be in the top five? Top ten?
I'm not saying the Yankees are doomed or that they suck. But they aren't built for a championship. No one on that staff will simply take a WS game and shut down an opponent. And to win in October, you need two guys who dominate.
____________________________
Games still have to be played because nothing is won on paper but anyone who can't see that a rotation with CC, Burnett, Wang, Sheets/Pettite and Joba has the potential to be the best in the AL is not only a Yankee hater but extremely delusional.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 13, 2008 at 11:50 AM
No, YanksFanSince78, I'm not a Yankee hater. I'm a rare neutral observer. I'm an NL fan who appreciates the fact that all of baseball benefits in revenue and higher ratings when the Yankees are winning. And I don't get all psycho that the Yanks outspend everyone else---they have the market to support it and, like I said, when the Yanks do well, baseball does well.
But still, I have to go back to what I was saying to make sure it's being heard right. Burnett and CC are really good additions who will help get NY back in the playoffs, but to win the Series, you need to have dominant pitching. And CC was not effective in any of his five postseason starts so far---that does not bode well. My point is that the Yankees have a pretty poor GM in Cashman if he passed on a Santana deal (Hughes had better become a solid #3 to make that nondeal look good) and ended up paying a bigger contract to the less talented CC, and if he let Harden go to the Cubs and went after Burnett instead. Again, go back to that challenge: if you were a manager and could have anyone in mlb start a WS Game 7 for you, who would it be? List your top ten in order. Did you see what Hamels did last fall? That is the kind of lights out domination I'm talking about. The Yanks have zero guys like that...unless they get Peavy who is legitimately one of the top five pitchers in mlb. Finally, do the Yanks have the middle relief to get to Mo?
And then, there's the lineup problem. Swisher at 1st? They better get Tex. Cano at 2nd, will he get his game back? Jeter is one of the best champions in mlb history but is he on the downside? Arod , despite all the b.s. everyone likes to spew at the highest paid guy, is worth the money. Damon in LF is losing his legs, which was pretty much his best asset. Cabrera or even Cameron in CF? Really?! Nady in RF, who had his best year last year---anyone ever see him in San Diego? Posada now has bad legs; for a catcher in his mid-30s that's like a pitcher with shoulder trouble. And Matsui, another injured senior, at DH? That's what NY has for the top payroll in mlb?! Who in NY thinks Cashman has done the best possible job?
Posted by: paxterj | December 13, 2008 at 12:40 PM
can i just ask the question of why does everyone put burnett as there number 2 pitcher. Wang is easily their number 2
Posted by: HardCoreYanksFan7 | December 13, 2008 at 01:00 PM
Yeah but Boston buys their players too!!!!!
Posted by: Kenan and Kel | December 12, 2008 at 04:02 PM
Totally disagree.....
1. Beckett was traded for in a mutliplayer deal.
2. Wakefield was signed after being dumped by the Pirates.
3. Lester drafted and brought up through the minors.
4. Dice-K was the only one bought AFTER being bid on for rights.
You forgot a few...
1. Manny Ramirez
2. David Ortiz
3. Johnny Damon
4. Daisuke Matsuzaka
5. Tim Wakefield
6. J. D. Drew
7. Hideki Okajima
8. Keith Foulke
9. Bill Mueller
All free agent signings...not saying that's bad...that's what your supposed to do...spend the money you make on the team, not put it in your pocket....the owners of these so called small market teams just refuse to spend (don't be fooled, they are all gazillionaires)...Burnett and Sabathia were ridiculously overpriced and overpaid...but the Yankees need three starters, they lost Pettitte and Mussina and the young guys aren't quite there yet (I wouldn't give up on them after one bad season), they have 80 mill off the books this coming season and more next year... I just wish these other teams would step up and I wouldn't have to see my team get stuck with these overpriced players that I don't really care for
Posted by: Yanks27 | December 13, 2008 at 01:56 PM
YanksFanSince78
"And to win in October, you need two guys who dominate."
What does that mean?
The White Sox won the series with awesome pitching that year and who did they have Buehrle, Garland, Contreras and Freddy Garcia.. not exactly dominate guys... what you need to win championships is a combination of 'never say die' and luck.
Posted by: Yanks27 | December 13, 2008 at 02:09 PM
So you don't view CC as a top 5 pitcher in baseball? Please.. If that's your opinion then so be it. Don't state it like it's fact because there's no question that in the last 2 years, most people will say, he's easily in everyone's top 5 in any conversation. Also, get over the total amount of the deal. The $161 avg'd over 7 years is the same as Santana's deal avg over 6 years. Also, the Mets had to trade 4 prospects to get Santana AND give him what was then the highest contract for a pitcher. In no way shape or form do I pass up CC because he may not have performed well in 25 post season innings. To judge a player like CC and Arod strictly by what they do in the post season is a poor arguement. They still need to play well in 162 games to get to the playoffs and this year there were no better options, that didn't require prospects, than CC. And Burnett makes a great number 2.
As far as whether Burnett should be #2 or #3 or vice versa with Wang, who cares? Unless it's a matter of respect for Wang as an incumbent, then I'm sure the rotations could just as easily be CC, Burnett and Wang or CC, Wang and Burnett. I'm sure most of the players could care less either.
To search the stats for players to acquire simply by how they perform in the post season isn't the right way to put together a team. Maybe it's good for a bench/role player but you have to look at the players total body of work.
As for Cashman it's his job to acquire the best possible talent and put them on the field. It's then the players job to deliver. How can people, in one instance, be criticized for not growing the farm, and then be blasted for trying to reep the benefits of the system by letting his young guys play? Seriously, as a Yank fan I want to win every year. I'm not going to blast him because we missed the playoffs in 1 year out of , what, 10 as a GM? You want rookie players? Well sometimes they struggle.
As for the rest of the team I obviously know we have questions. But do you know what financial restraints he might be working under? DO you know if he was given the right to spend 1/2 a billion dollars this year? How can you critique the man and his acquisitions not knowing that answer? Obviously our biggest needs were starting pitching. There was no way we could go into next year with:
Wand
Pettite
Joba
Hughes
??????
and feel as if we could TRULY compete. Sure..things could have been much better than last years showing with regards to the kids but I'd rather take my chanes with CC and AJ on the staff now. This way if we do decide to go with Joba and Hughes as starters we at least have 3 guys, who if healthy, should be able to give us 90 quality starts between them.
As for Tex, again, pitching was the biggest need this offseason. We just committed $250 mil for 2 players and we still are looking at an additional pitcher (Pettite or Sheets probably), a CF in Cameron and probably a utility guy. If the Bosses allow him the money to devote $200 mil to Tex then I'm sure Cash would do so. But I will not blame him for not doing it because he may not have the authority to committ that many dollars. As for Swisher? BIG DEAL!!! The guy is getting paid $5mil a year and was obtained for amounts to William Bettemit, a utility guy at best for the Yanks. At least we have an option in case they don't want to committ $200 mil to Tex or are outbid for his services.
You have to look at the bigger picture dude.
Also, Posada doesn't have any leg problems (it was his shoulder). DO you even watch or follow the Yanks? Damon and Matsui have both been very productive in their time hear and they each are headed out the door after next year. Nady had a career year last year. Let's see if he produces the same or close to it next year.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 13, 2008 at 02:16 PM
Yanks27: Not sure when I said that but what is your point? Dominate doesn't always mean strikeout pitchers. We need at least 2 stud pitchers in the playoffs. Is that not true? I think CC and Aj can be those guys.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 13, 2008 at 02:50 PM
Yes and no on whether you should throw out the postseason stats. A position player can't be judged on postseason play since anything can happen in a handful of at-bats; you may never see your pitch, etc. But a pitcher controls the game, and he better be able to shut down an opponent. CC has not shown an ability to keep his adrenaline in check in those games so far. It is a concern and argument #1 why Cashman has failed in putting the best players on the field, as you say his job is. And yes, CC is not in the top five. Webb, Halladay, Peavy, Hamels, Oswalt, and even Haren are more reliable. It's not whether you can strike out 13 Pirates in June; it's whether you can get outs against the NL champs in October.
It's pretty hard to take the budget concerns seriously. Obviously, even NY doesn't have unlimited funds, but they clearly are under way less constraint than any other team.
They have no bat other than Arod that intimidates anyone. They need another top rbi guy to make it over the top.
Yeah the White Sox won it with four solid guys who were all all the very top of their game at the exact right time. It was their one chance and it worked---lightning in a bottle. And then where did they go? But if you have the Yankee dollars and are trying to build a team with the best chance of consistently winning, you go after the best big game pitchers in mlb. Period.
Posted by: paxterj | December 13, 2008 at 03:12 PM
"Uh. Mo has 1 pitch. Joba has 4. We just paid 161MM for an ace. 82.5MM for a #3.
The Mets picked up a top notch closer for $37MM.
Anyone who thinks Joba will not develop into at least an AJ Burnett level starter does not have much baseball knowledge.
In today's market that is twice the value of a top closer. "
Maybe you dont recall, but when Mo was coming up he had an arsenal of pitches. Most young pitchers can throw upwards of 6 pitches. Of course, it's not always smart for them to use them. Mo stopped using his other pitches simply because he didn't need them. Neither does Joba. He has a disgusting slider and fastball that pops. All he needs to be an elite closer. The more curves and changes Joba throws, the more he's going to hang and get knocked around because theyre not his primary pitches. He doesn't throw them for a reason. Why mess with him if he can easily get hitters out with what he's got?
Joba has a great pitching build, but it's absurd to guarantee a pitchers greatness. Homer Bailey has amazing tools, may never amount to anything. When it comes to any Professional sport, if you can find 1 thing you do above average, you're set.
Posted by: Dave | December 13, 2008 at 04:27 PM
Dave?? What world are you on? Joba has 3 plus plus pitches and 1 plus pitch. He doesn't throw them when he closes because he doesn't have to. He throws them as a starter and he does it very well. You can get buy with less talent as a set up guy. Wasting him as a set up guy for the next 2 years when you have a well stocked bullpen and 2 kids in the minors who were drafted as closers is silly. Worse case scenario you can always send Joba back to the bullpen if he fails.
And as far as CC is conerned paxterj if you don't feel he's a top 5 guy then that's your opinion and you're entitled to have one. But on what merit are you using to say that Webb, Halladay, Peavy, Hamels, Oswalt, and even Haren are more reliable?
And PS...none of those guys were available this year anyway. Peavy didn't approve of a trade to the AL and we didn't have the prospect for either him or Haren. Your arguement is null and void if you can't obtain those other players. The Yanks went out and got the two best available and I'm happy to have them.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 13, 2008 at 05:34 PM
YanksFanSince78 if you're still on this thread, this is all opinion on everyone's part. On what do I base my opinion about all these pitchers? Besides ERA and other usual stats, it pretty much comes down to a gut sense of which pitchers do I least want my team to have to face. And the one thing those pitchers all have is consistent excellence. You can 100% count on them. My point about all those other guys wasn't that Cashman should have gotten them this year. Obviously, they weren't available. But the alternative shouldn't be sign whoever the big name is this year---there should have been more of a plan over the last 12 years.
Simply put, should Cashman after a dozen years have a roster with this many holes? Don't the Yankees deserve better? If you go back to 1996 or whenever he came on as GM, do you think he did the best job that any GM could have done since then? Not was he perfect, but could anyone in mlb have done better with that money? The last rings were in 2000, the last Yankee team that was the best team in mlb was 2003. Cashman is in line for blame in the decline.
Posted by: paxterj | December 14, 2008 at 01:34 AM
Dave,
Mo never had a plus second pitch. Yes, he can throw a change NOW.
There is a big difference between the two of them.
Joba has the potential to be a great starter and at teh very least should be a very good one. That is worth twice what a top closer is.
And Joba has not proven he can "close" games. I think he could. But to date, he has proven in a limited audition that he is an outstanding set up man.
Something that generally commands $15MM contracts. Compare that with Sabathia's.
The Yankees would be foolish to put him in the pen.
Now Hughes is a different story. He could use the confidence of getting big leaguers out, IMO. Let him get that the way the Twins let Santana and Liriano get it.
Posted by: NJYankeeFan | December 14, 2008 at 08:31 AM
Maybe you guys were a little distraught after the strike and missed the entire 95 season. A season in which Mo, a bred shortstop turned starting pitcher, started 10 games for the Yankees. At the time Mo was throwing a mixture of Fastballs (2 & 4 seam), a change and a slider. All pitches were being described as ++ stuff by scouts. After Mo came in one day an sat down 11 batters in a start, sports writters where automatically putting the "future #1" tag on him. Guy threw 95-98 with good location and excellent movement. If we had the same blogging environment in 95 that we have now, Rivera would have much more hype than Joba ever has.
Not to mention the fact that every scout outside of our orginization has said that Joba has 2 ++ pitches, his fastball and slider. The rest is just hyperbole. You could easily see that in Joba's starts last season. The games in which he got knocked around were mainly due to his usage of his below average curve ball. Armchair quarterbacks like to throw the ++ rating out there even when it's absurd to do so. There wasn't a single hook or change that he threw last season that made people turn their heads, that's a ++ pitch. Not the curve he throws and gets deposited 400ft away.
The kid is amazing. There's just one thing you don't understand. Professional baseball players are the top 5-10% of atheletes who have ever played the game. To find just 1 spot in which your good is an anomaly. The rest is called pushing your luck.
Of course I'm worried about putting 180-200 innings on this guys arm. He's already proven that he can be a potential all star in the pen. I'm sure you've never had a serious sports related injury and have no clue how you can never be 100% in that area again. If Joba winds up needing tommy john or rotator cuff surgery, there's an excellent chance he will never be the same pitcher again. Those 20 ++ pitches he supposedly has will disapear on the noodle that hangs off his shoulder.
While you may be ready to see postseason wins disapear at the hands of Humberto Sanchez for the next decade, I'm not as ready to do that.
Mo retiring will be the biggest loss the Yankees have seen in deacades. Much worse than seeing that duckfart Renteria hit in game 7. Personally, Id much rather see Joba throwing 50-70 innings a year out of the pen and securing wins than 150 as a 5th starter.
You have 3 current or former #1 starters in your rotation. Joba would see waste as a 4th or 5th starter. Hughes however could greatly benefit from the experience. Send Joba to the pen and let Mo groom him. Even if you want Sanchez to be our future closer, he's still not going to get much experience in with Mo, which is possibly priceless.
Posted by: Dave | December 14, 2008 at 04:24 PM
i guess lowe is next. why do i hate the yankees so much?
Posted by: huey | December 15, 2008 at 01:11 PM
i guess lowe is next. why do i hate the yankees so much?
Posted by: huey | December 15, 2008 at 01:11 PM
Well either A- You're a Red Sox fan, or B- You root for a small market team who doesn't make a lot of money to pay the players as much as the Yankees can (which of course they do overpay them)
Posted by: mike923 | December 16, 2008 at 02:07 AM
Hahaaa 2 aces in 3 days!
Posted by: YankeesFanatic95 | December 17, 2008 at 02:50 PM
"You have 3 current or former #1 starters in your rotation. Joba would see waste as a 4th or 5th starter. Hughes however could greatly benefit from the experience. Send Joba to the pen and let Mo groom him. Even if you want Sanchez to be our future closer, he's still not going to get much experience in with Mo, which is possibly priceless."
That is the beauty of the whole situation. we have two young studs that more than likely will project to have top of the rotation stuff with Joba and Phil, but they won't be able to sniff the 1,2,3 slots for 5 years assuming we give Chien-Ming some sort of deal.
Besides, Sanchez is a project wherever he is placed... Melancon is the top prospect reliever with ~6"break on a 94mph 2sfb. we have marte locked up for 3. bruney has skillz. Robertson, Veras, eRam, Christian Garcia may have to resort to the bullpen. soo many options; don't even sweat it, dawg
Posted by: ArodMVP217 | December 19, 2008 at 12:20 PM