![]() |
|
|
| |
« Orioles Close To Signing Zaun | Main | Mets Confident About Rotation »
Tom Haudricourt of the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel has the latest from Brewers GM Doug Melvin on the team's plans:
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e2010536c5a8ff970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Brewers Rumors: Sheets, Cameron, Swisher:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
This team is just dieing to finish 3rd or 4th in the central this year.....
Posted by: daniel | January 11, 2009 at 09:27 AM
Of course the Yankees looking for a centerfielder. They dont like Gardner because he doesnt hit well and Melky was injured on his arm by a pitch from Daniel Cabrera. The Brewers GM is a very smart man.
Posted by: terry180 | January 11, 2009 at 09:28 AM
the yankees would not trade swisher for cameron the brewers would need to add in a prospect.
Posted by: patrick | January 11, 2009 at 09:30 AM
A Cameron for Swisher trade wouldn't help the Brewers. They were going to trade Cameron for payroll relief. Swisher is owed over $20M over the next 3 seasons. If they weren't going to pick up Igawa's salary, why would they pick up Swisher's? Igawa is owed less than Swisher over the same 3 years.
Posted by: DodgersBruin | January 11, 2009 at 09:33 AM
ugh we are never gonne get rid of swisher and nady... i hate swisher
Posted by: YankPhan420 | January 11, 2009 at 09:34 AM
i want both gone so we got some more money and outfield space for manny... who needs D when you have pitching and hitting
Posted by: YankPhan420 | January 11, 2009 at 09:34 AM
trade nady, swisher, hughes, and kennedy for peavy and gerut
Posted by: tommy | January 11, 2009 at 09:36 AM
manny is not going to sign with the yankees they are not going to do that they might have before signing Mark Teixeira.
Posted by: patrick | January 11, 2009 at 09:37 AM
"the yankees would not trade swisher for cameron the brewers would need to add in a prospect."
That's incorrect. 1) Cameron is better than Melky/Gardner offensively. 2) Next season Cameron's CHONE OPS is .767. Swisher's is .814. Cameron's defense more than makes up for the difference in offense. 3) Cameron for 1 year would allow AJax to take over in 2010.
So the Yankees COULD make the deal. The Brewers would almost be guaranteed to only trade Cameron for Swisher if there was no other players added by the Brewers. Otherwise there's no benefit to Milwaukee.
Posted by: DodgersBruin | January 11, 2009 at 09:37 AM
melky and swisher for Cameron...and the NYY should just release Igawa..
Id rather see the NYY make a deal for Cameron than trade Nady and Swisher for anything from the Nationals..
Posted by: TripleHHH | January 11, 2009 at 09:42 AM
nady had a fluke season id trade him a his contract is up and his value is high as of now get rid of him while they still can, the yankees should have learned there lesson when they did not get rid of melky for Santana.
Posted by: patrick | January 11, 2009 at 09:44 AM
include him rather in the package
Posted by: patrick | January 11, 2009 at 09:45 AM
"I still believe the yankees are laying in the weeds on manny... its too much of a bargain and if we clear nady and swisher..... still keeps payroll down"
The Dodgers offered 2/$45M with a 3rd year option. They haven't spent that payroll. So if any other team signs Manny, it's going to cost at least that much. How is Manny a bargain that will keep payroll down? Nady and Swisher won't make a combined $22.5M next year.
Posted by: DodgersBruin | January 11, 2009 at 09:46 AM
damon and matsui done after this season i rather have matt holiday then manny.
Posted by: patrick | January 11, 2009 at 09:48 AM
"nady had a fluke season id trade him a his contract is up and his value is high as of now get rid of him while they still can, the yankees should have learned there lesson when they did not get rid of melky for Santana."
You sure Nady's value is high? Things lowering Nady's value: 1) free agent after next season. 2) represented by Boras. 3) Had a fluke 89 games for the Pirates. 4) Was back in line with his career OPS+ while with the Yankees (105). 5) Nady will probably make between $5-7M next season.
Posted by: DodgersBruin | January 11, 2009 at 09:49 AM
its higher then it should be
Posted by: patrick | January 11, 2009 at 09:50 AM
I think a melky and swisher for dukes would be a good trade.
Posted by: mynameborat | January 11, 2009 at 09:51 AM
try Milledge
Posted by: patrick | January 11, 2009 at 09:52 AM
this is coming from a milwaukee paper.. i doubt the yankees have even thought of trading swisher for cameron
Posted by: hawkeyes12990 | January 11, 2009 at 09:57 AM
i think that the brewers would be better off to take nady instead of swish because nady is going to be a free agent, and swish is owed 21 million for next three seasons, cameron is do to make 9 mil this year why not take nady for about 3.5 take the pay reduction from the offense a give sheets about 9 mil with 2 mil in incentives and maybe option for next year,besides the fact of saving money with nady instead of cameron you gain batting average,less strikeouts,equal power the down side of course is defense.
Posted by: yanksin4 | January 11, 2009 at 10:04 AM
Swisher is about to enter his prime these next three years he should get a .260 average with 30 hrs and 100 rbis nady should close to .300 so we should get some value for them melky in his prime will probally hit .280 with good he already had a season where he hit .280
Posted by: mynameborat | January 11, 2009 at 10:05 AM
the yankees would trade swisher for cameron but not nady would take a bit more
Posted by: patrick | January 11, 2009 at 10:06 AM
Two errors in my last post which not with which is good.
And nady should be close to
Posted by: mynameborat | January 11, 2009 at 10:07 AM
Id rather have Cameron than Milledge unless Milledge can handle NY and avoid acting cocky.
Nady had a great season and maybe he ought to be kept around to see if he can do it again. Posada had a bad season last year & the Yanks are keeping him around even though he cant throw to 2nd base that well (hopefully he will be back to form in 2009), why not give the Xman Nady a shot. Have him bat behind Tex and Arod and see what happens
Posted by: TripleHHH | January 11, 2009 at 10:07 AM
Also melky is already a good fielder
Posted by: mynameborat | January 11, 2009 at 10:09 AM
the yankees do not want another outfielder
nady is not nearly worth swisher
in gardners small sample size, he was better defensively, and he improved the second time he was called up offensively. cameron only provides for pop. thats it.
Posted by: hawkeyes12990 | January 11, 2009 at 10:09 AM
how about trade both nady and swisher and get money or just wait for holliday next year and your 2009 outfeild will be damon matsui and melky. which sucks but im ok cause there infeild makes it up
Posted by: alex | January 11, 2009 at 10:15 AM
sorry not money i ment manny
Posted by: alex | January 11, 2009 at 10:16 AM
Mike Cameron might be the piece the Yankees need to reclaim the division. Without a slick glove guy between the mediocre fielding LF and RF the Yanks might come up just short now that the Rays and Sox have both fortified. Wouldn't it be something if not trading a pitching prospect for a good CF cost the Yanks a game in Sept and they ended up missing the playoffs with 90 something wins. The Brewers would take Hughs or Kennedy for Cameron. Yanks should trade Milwaukee the guy less likely to pitch for them this year. Brewers don't want a position player.
Posted by: The Beav | January 11, 2009 at 10:24 AM
"The Brewers would take Hughs or Kennedy for Cameron."
just stop with a post like that.
Posted by: patrick | January 11, 2009 at 10:27 AM
The Yankees still have interest in Mike Cameron and floated the idea of a Nick Swisher for Cameron swap.
___
This would be so messed up that I have to believe it's not true.
Posted by: Rich | January 11, 2009 at 10:28 AM
how about swisher for DeJesus a Brooklyn native I'm sure he would fit in with the yankees fine.
Posted by: patrick | January 11, 2009 at 10:32 AM
"Nady worth 2 prospects."
Yeah, 2 fringe prospect maybe.
"how about swisher for DeJesus a Brooklyn native I'm sure he would fit in with the yankees fine."
Ummm, and now we've entered Yankee dream land. DeJesus is better and cheaper than Swisher. And signed through 2011.
Posted by: DodgersBruin | January 11, 2009 at 10:34 AM
Yankees arent dealing for a CF until the all-star break, if melky/gardner arent getting the job done.
brewers have no need to trade cameran, if they're out of contention by july then they'd be more willing to trade guys to clear salary. if cameran isnt available then they'll look at dejesus or randy winn or some other stop gap for the 2nd half of the season
Posted by: Zack | January 11, 2009 at 10:36 AM
"DeJesus is better and cheaper than Swisher."
they're different type of players. dejesus would be better fit for the yankees defensively as a CF, but swisher has that high obp, high pitches per plate appearance, and twice the power that dejesus has
Posted by: Zack | January 11, 2009 at 10:39 AM
randy winn does not play center the yankees are not looking for another RFer
Posted by: patrick | January 11, 2009 at 10:41 AM
well randy winn has played center and still has speed so he would be an upgrade over melky/gardner if they arent getting the job done. and like i said he would be after trying to get dejesus and cameran, have a better cf option then that?
Posted by: Zack | January 11, 2009 at 10:44 AM
McLouth
Posted by: patrick | January 11, 2009 at 10:47 AM
yeah and we should trade for pujols too?
why would pirates trade him? hes their only star, hes cheap, hes under control, they're trying to sign him long term. plus they'd want hughes, austin jackson, and another prospect.
and hes overrated defensively (dont bring up gold glove) and he had a career year at the plate
Posted by: Zack | January 11, 2009 at 10:50 AM
i dont understand why the yankees don't trade nady for a number 4/5 starter and place swish in center he played center for the most part for the soxs.
Posted by: patrick | January 11, 2009 at 10:55 AM
"they're different type of players. dejesus would be better fit for the yankees defensively as a CF, but swisher has that high obp, high pitches per plate appearance, and twice the power that dejesus has"
Seriously? First off, DeJesus is the better CF. The Royals already have corner OFs in Guillen and Teahen. Second, with the addition of Crisp, DeJesus will probably be a corner OF. Third, last season DeJesus has a 119 OPS+. That includes "high obp and power".
Oh, and DeJesus makes $14M to Swisher's $21M the next 3 seasons.
Posted by: DodgersBruin | January 11, 2009 at 10:57 AM
"I am not sure, but last I check, their line-up/roster is pretty much atrocious. I mean there are good players on the team, let's be fair, but they have holes up and down the line-up. You make it sound like the Yank's are the 4th place team."
A team that was within 1 game of the World Series all of a sudden has an "atrocious" lineup? What "holes" do the Red Sox have? 1B, 2B, LF, and RF are great players. 3B and DH are injury issues. SS and CF are coming off their rookie years.
As for the Yankees, 1B, 3B and LF are great players. SS and RF were just league average last season. 2B and CF were below average.
So who has the "atrocious" lineup? The Yankees weren't 4th place. They were 3rd. And with last season's departures, they have really improved their offense from last year.
Posted by: DodgersBruin | January 11, 2009 at 11:03 AM
"DeJesus is the better CF"
i said dejesus was better defensively.
you took dejesus' career year for OPS+, he's going to be back around 105 while swisher will be back around 125
Posted by: Zack | January 11, 2009 at 11:05 AM
"Oh, and DeJesus makes $14M to Swisher's $21M the next 3 seasons."
exactly, why would royals make this move?
Posted by: Zack | January 11, 2009 at 11:06 AM
calling right soxs RF a great player bobby had a better year then drew. and then calling him league average and calling jeter average get real.
Posted by: patrick | January 11, 2009 at 11:09 AM
red** rather not right
Posted by: patrick | January 11, 2009 at 11:10 AM
Both lineups have their issues, health will be the deciding factor. Each team has its concerns Drew/Ortiz/Lowell & Posada/Matsui/Damon
Posted by: Zack | January 11, 2009 at 11:12 AM
I have said time and time again the Yankees need to try to acquire David Dejesus and Zack Grienke from the Royals. They get a young CF with a lot of pop and an ACE that is cheap and covetable for many years. If it means trading Swisher and solid prospects then so be it.
Posted by: Rolling{Night}Hawk{09} | January 11, 2009 at 11:40 AM
""Oh, and DeJesus makes $14M to Swisher's $21M the next 3 seasons."
exactly, why would royals make this move?"
Beats me. It was a Yankee fan who suggested this trade. I listed the reasons the Royals would have no interest in Swisher.
Posted by: DodgersBruin | January 11, 2009 at 11:54 AM
"This team is just dieing to finish 3rd or 4th in the central this year....."
My money is still on finishing 2nd if they get another pitcher. Parra showed a lot of growth last year and Gallardo is a very good pitcher. Bush and Suppan are adequate back end pitchers, that just leaves one hole that needs to be filled.
The offense is above average and the defense was even above average last year as much as Weeks and Fielder tried to sabatoge it.
The bullpen should be at least as good as last year as well.
No other team in the division has really made any improvements either, Reds signed some guys who should be bench players, Astros just got another year older with an old team and the Cardinals haven't done anything.
Posted by: Ender | January 11, 2009 at 11:56 AM
"calling right soxs RF a great player bobby had a better year then drew. and then calling him league average and calling jeter average get real."
Abreu isn't with the Yankees next year is he? Nady is a league average player. Jeter was league average offensively last year and below average defensively.
I am real. It's about time you live in the present and not the past patrick.
Posted by: DodgersBruin | January 11, 2009 at 11:56 AM
And JD Drew had the better OPS+ last year than Abreu. Abreu had more ABs. Either can be said to have had the better year: Drew had better stats when he played, Abreu was on the field for 600 ABs.
Posted by: DodgersBruin | January 11, 2009 at 12:00 PM
actually jeter was only slightly below average defensively last year, and fielded better than michael young who won the gold glove
and his offense was above average
being ranked 9th in the MLB during a "down" as a shortstop is not below average
Posted by: hawkeyes12990 | January 11, 2009 at 12:19 PM
down year*
Posted by: hawkeyes12990 | January 11, 2009 at 12:26 PM
The Yankees are not going to trade Swisher for 1 year of Cameron. Long-term the deal makes no sense. A combo of Melky and Gardner can suffice for one year. Plus the Yanks would be smart to give Gardner a chance to prove himself. He hit much better after his second call up than his first and the Yanks need to think about who might be able to replace Damon as a leadoff hitter after the 09 season. People need to get off the bull**it of judging a promosing rookie based upon a poor showing in a very small sample size of 127 at bats.
Also, on another not I really truly think people need to get over this stupid idea of the value of a late 1st round pick. If I'm a team coming off of a playoff bid and just lost two premier pitchers and had the opportunity to sign a Type A player that I felt would dramatically help my team I could care less about a 1st rnd pick in the 20's (27th overall). The cream of the crop lies in the top 10. Sure, you can find gems late in the 1st round, but c'mon....you're in the hunt for a championship. Even if they were to find a good player at #27 overall , how long would it take for that player to have an impact on the team, 2-3 years? If I'm a Brewers fan who just had a sniff of the playoffs after 20 years, was elimanted in the 1st round and just lost 2 front line pitcher, I would want my team to go out and replace at least one of them via FA and maybe another thri a trade. Makes no sense.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | January 11, 2009 at 12:47 PM
"and his offense was above average"
Jeter's OPS+ was 102. Almost the very definition of average. And Gold Gloves are worthless. Who cares who won it?
Posted by: DodgersBruin | January 11, 2009 at 12:48 PM
And as much as I am a Yanks fan people have to operate with realistic expectations that Austin Jackson may not be ready to start by 2010. What has be done that would make anyone thing he's going to be the next Ricky Henderson? If anything, he will probably be the next Roberto Kelly, who was still a very good ballplayer btw.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | January 11, 2009 at 12:49 PM
Tom Handicourt usually doesn't make stuff up. He might not be the sharpest baseball reporter, but he is honest.
Looks like another case of the Yankees trying to pawn off their overpriced medicority onto the brewers. First Igawa/Cabrera & now Swisher.
My concern with Swisher would be two fold. Billy Beane & Kenny Williams dumped him for prospects that's a big red flag. If two good GM's dump you uh-oh. That second half last year in Chicago was brutual. Is that a hiccup or an Andruw Jones free fall. Taking on 21 Million in salary is a huge risk/reward scenario.
To get Greinke away from KC its going to cost some serious talent. KC is not motivated to move DeJesus or Greinke. Decent prospects won't even get a call returned.
Posted by: AndyVanSlyke | January 11, 2009 at 12:51 PM
"Also, on another not I really truly think people need to get over this stupid idea of the value of a late 1st round pick. If I'm a team coming off of a playoff bid and just lost two premier pitchers and had the opportunity to sign a Type A player that I felt would dramatically help my team I could care less about a 1st rnd pick in the 20's (27th overall). The cream of the crop lies in the top 10. Sure, you can find gems late in the 1st round, but c'mon....you're in the hunt for a championship."
And this is why you're not going to be a GM any time soon. The Brewers just lost their best 2 pitchers. They AREN'T going to be competing for a championship next season. And there are MANY gems outside the top 10. Joba was a compensation pick - #41. Lester was a 2nd rounder. Same with McCann.
Point being, it's not where the draft pick is, but that you have as many draft picks as possible. And to lose them for what? Oliver Perez? He sucks. Derek Lowe? It'll still be a few years before the Brewers compete, thus negating his value to the Brewers. Juan Cruz? Relievers are volatile.
Posted by: DodgersBruin | January 11, 2009 at 12:59 PM
"Is that a hiccup or an Andruw Jones free fall."
Only Andruw Jones will ever have an Andruw Jones free fall. But he could be having a Bret Boone or Marcus Giles free fall.
Posted by: DodgersBruin | January 11, 2009 at 01:00 PM
derek jeter is 4.65 runs above the average shortstop
thanks
Posted by: hawkeyes12990 | January 11, 2009 at 01:05 PM
""Oh, and DeJesus makes $14M to Swisher's $21M the next 3 seasons."
exactly, why would royals make this move?"
Beats me. It was a Yankee fan who suggested this trade. I listed the reasons the Royals would have no interest in Swisher.
_________________________
Actually, before you rip on the guy, that deal would've made a lot of sense if it were done before they traded for Mike Jacobs to play 1st.
In his worst year, Swisher easily beat anyone on the ROyals 08 roster in HRS (24 vs 20 by Guillen), BB (82 vs 66 by Gordon) and pitches taken (2,661 vs 2,402 by Mark Teahan). Even now they might be smart to try and find room for Swisher since Jacobs is a one dimesnional hitter (hits hrs but horrible lifetime obp of .318). Maybe instead of DeJesus for Swisher, maybe Swisher for Coco Crisp (who has a $8 mil 2010 option) and a couple of minor leaguers.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | January 11, 2009 at 01:19 PM
Tom Handicourt usually doesn't make stuff up. He might not be the sharpest baseball reporter, but he is honest.
Looks like another case of the Yankees trying to pawn off their overpriced medicority onto the brewers. First Igawa/Cabrera & now Swisher.
My concern with Swisher would be two fold. Billy Beane & Kenny Williams dumped him for prospects that's a big red flag. If two good GM's dump you uh-oh. That second half last year in Chicago was brutual. Is that a hiccup or an Andruw Jones free fall. Taking on 21 Million in salary is a huge risk/reward scenario.
To get Greinke away from KC its going to cost some serious talent. KC is not motivated to move DeJesus or Greinke. Decent prospects won't even get a call returned.
______________________________
Look, I have no emotional attachment to Swisher at all, but saying that the fact he was traded for prospects indicates a problem is absurd. What talented player earning money hasn't Beane traded? As for Swisher in CHicago Ozzie made it obviuos that he had personality comflicts with Swisher. He had an off year, but I would hardly classify him as damaged goods.
Ans as I mentioned in a above post, w/ the exception of the newly acquired Jacobs to play 1st , Swisher easily had better stats that any player on the Royals in terms of HRS, BB and pitches taken. He would be a great bat to stich in the middle of your line-up to make the pitchers work a little and teach the younger hitters about patience.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | January 11, 2009 at 01:24 PM
"Actually, before you rip on the guy, that deal would've made a lot of sense if it were done before they traded for Mike Jacobs to play 1st."
So this would have been a good deal if this trade had been made before the Yankees had Swisher? Jacobs to the Royals October 30. Swisher to the Yankees November 13.
You're ridiculous.
Posted by: DodgersBruin | January 11, 2009 at 01:29 PM
There's no way Melvin would be stupid enough to do any deal with the Yankees for Cameron unless he's going to get one of their young arms. The Brewers don't need/ can't afford to have overpaid, mediodcre players clogging up the payroll
Posted by: JoeyT107 | January 11, 2009 at 01:35 PM
Also, on another not I really truly think people need to get over this stupid idea of the value of a late 1st round pick. If I'm a team coming off of a playoff bid and just lost two premier pitchers and had the opportunity to sign a Type A player that I felt would dramatically help my team I could care less about a 1st rnd pick in the 20's (27th overall). The cream of the crop lies in the top 10. Sure, you can find gems late in the 1st round, but c'mon....you're in the hunt for a championship."
And this is why you're not going to be a GM any time soon. The Brewers just lost their best 2 pitchers. They AREN'T going to be competing for a championship next season. And there are MANY gems outside the top 10. Joba was a compensation pick - #41. Lester was a 2nd rounder. Same with McCann.
Point being, it's not where the draft pick is, but that you have as many draft picks as possible. And to lose them for what? Oliver Perez? He sucks. Derek Lowe? It'll still be a few years before the Brewers compete, thus negating his value to the Brewers. Juan Cruz? Relievers are volatile.
____________________
Dodgers, maybe you should'nt be so reactionary? My point is, if I'm a fan and my team just sniffed the playoffs for the 1st time in 20 years, then maybe they should go out and try to replace the 2 pitchers they just lost!!??? They had $100 mil to offer CC but they can't spend half of that to replace them and try contend next year? You mean they couldn't of gone after Ben Sheets, Randy Johnson, Oliver Perez, Javier Vasquez, etc? That's the whole philosophy of small market teams....build the foundation of your team thru the farm and drafting players and then when you rready to contend you go after a FA payer or two. They still have a deep famr and can still continue to develop players. They could've passed on Cameron and used his 10 mil and Gagne's 10 mil and picked up some good players. Hoffman was a good move, they need to sign a pitcher. I'd rather sign an O.Perez and Sheets for 1 year, rather than trade Fielder, who's replacement would not be guaranteed to put up comparable numbers.
Meanwhile, the clock is ticking as Fielder, Hart and Hardy are all becoming arb eligible and 2 or 3 years away from FA. The time is now for them to contend.
And how crazy is it that they Brewers have $60 mil invested in Jeff Suppan, Mike Cameron and Bill Hall over the next 3 years?
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | January 11, 2009 at 01:37 PM
"Actually, before you rip on the guy, that deal would've made a lot of sense if it were done before they traded for Mike Jacobs to play 1st."
So this would have been a good deal if this trade had been made before the Yankees had Swisher? Jacobs to the Royals October 30. Swisher to the Yankees November 13.
You're ridiculous.
___________________
The point was that Swisher would've have made perfect sense IF they hadn't already secured a 1B. The deal wold STILL make sense but they would have to clear one of their OF, thus making it neccesary for them to make a 2nd move.
Guillen is stuck in RF and you have Crisp, DeJesus and Teahan sharing CF/LF. With Jacobs being acquired that blocks Swisher from playing 1st. Subtract DeJesus from the line-up and you would still have a crowded OF with Crisp, Guillen, Teahan and Swisher.
Therefore, the reason I said it would've made more sense b4 they traded for Jacobs (because Swisher would play 1B and they would have an OF of Crisp, Teahan and Guillen).
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | January 11, 2009 at 01:45 PM
There's no way Melvin would be stupid enough to do any deal with the Yankees for Cameron unless he's going to get one of their young arms. The Brewers don't need/ can't afford to have overpaid, mediodcre players clogging up the payroll
_________________________
Swisher for Camron wouldn't make sense, but it absolutely would've made sense for them to rid themselves of Cameron (for a package of cheep serviceable players) and use his $10 mil to put towards signing a SP.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | January 11, 2009 at 01:48 PM
Even if Nady is only for a yr, he comes with the possibility of being a Type A FA and if he leaves that team would get a 1st round pick. And knowing how players perform in their contract year it is very likely. CC was a 3 month rental and look want they gave for him. I'm not saying the Yanks will get the same but the Yanks are giving away a 2 draft pick by trading Nady.
Posted by: DominicanYanks | January 11, 2009 at 02:56 PM
C'mon RSD, really? Brittle pitching staff? Dice-K and Beckett come to mind. Old and past it's prime? Ortiz, Drew, Lowell and Varitek (if resigned). Glass houses brother...stop throwing stones.
And I'll match your youth movement as well.
Lester (25) = Joba (23)
Pedroia (25) = Cano (26)
Youks (30) = Teixeira (29)
Ellsbury (25) = Gardner (25) Melky (24)
Dice K (28( = Wang (29)
Beckett (29) = CC (28)
Ahhhh the smell of contradiction...
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | January 11, 2009 at 05:25 PM
its funny how soxs fans talk about the yankees coming in 3rd you guys came in third not to long ago in 2006 86-76.
Posted by: patrick | January 11, 2009 at 07:07 PM
Any one who thinks Cameron is worth anything major let alone Swisher is on crack, he is super old, super overrated, and super overpaid, plus you'd only have him for one year (not that you'd want him any longer than that. Swisher is versitile, still young, and signed for a reasonable amount till 2012. I could see them trading Nady for Cameron, but the Brewers would need to throw in a mid level prospect to get that done.
Posted by: JudgeNY | January 11, 2009 at 08:24 PM
"I have said time and time again the Yankees need to try to acquire David Dejesus and Zack Grienke from the Royals. They get a young CF with a lot of pop and an ACE that is cheap and covetable for many years. If it means trading Swisher and solid prospects then so be it.
Posted by: Rolling{Night}Hawk{09} | January 11, 2009 at 11:40 AM"
Yeah Hughes, Kennedy, Jackson, Cox, and Swisher.. maybe..
Posted by: 661dodgerblue | January 11, 2009 at 08:48 PM
"Any one who thinks Cameron is worth anything major let alone Swisher is on crack, he is super old, super overrated, and super overpaid, plus you'd only have him for one year (not that you'd want him any longer than that. Swisher is versitile, still young, and signed for a reasonable amount till 2012. I could see them trading Nady for Cameron, but the Brewers would need to throw in a mid level prospect to get that done.
Posted by: JudgeNY | January 11, 2009 at 08:24 PM"
You should save that for later.
Posted by: 661dodgerblue | January 11, 2009 at 08:50 PM