MLB Rumors - MLB Trade Rumors
Subscribe to MLB Trade Rumors using RSS
Home     Contact     About     Advertise     Archives     Widget     Fantasy      RSS Usage

« Pirates Still In On Baldelli | Main | Red Sox Close To Signing Rocco Baldelli »

Heyman's Latest: Yankees

Jon Heyman chimes in with a few notes on the Yankees...

  • Heyman confirms that the Yankees are accepting trade offers for Xavier Nady and Nick Swisher.
  • The Yankees have "no way to trade" Hideki Matsui, noting that he is coming off a knee surgery and has a full no-trade clause.
  • Heyman also says the Yankees will not trade Johnny Damon saying the team needs him to leadoff and play center field.

Cork Gaines writes for RaysIndex.com and can be reached here.


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e2010536b283f6970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Heyman's Latest: Yankees:

Comments

Hope Swisher gets traded instead of Nady..

I still think that Swisher makes the most sense going to Atlanta in an attempt to solve our outfield woes.

Don't give em much more than Prado, Todd Redmond and possibly a lower prospect to get it done, and then focus on the pitching situation.

Heyman's comments don't make sense. If the Yankees are going to use Damon in center field, there's no surplus of outfielders. Nady/Damon/Swisher outfield with Matsui at DH.

did he say they need johnny damon to play center field? Typo maybe?

Nady to Giants.Swisher to Braves.IFFFF this report from JON HEYMAN is true????!!!????

Nady to Giants.Swisher to Braves.IFFFF this report from JON HEYMAN is true????!!!????

The Yankees need Damon to play CF??? This is news to me, especially since the Yanks were just quoted as saying Gardner and Melky are going to platoon. Kinda takes away from Heymans credibility.

"Heyman also says the Yankees will not trade Johnny Damon saying the team needs him to leadoff and play center field."

I'm officially confused.

If the Yankees are willing to play Damon in center, then wouldn't they just go with an outfield of Nady, Damon and Swisher, with Matsui DHing?

Wasn't the whole point of this that they had an extra corner outfielder because Gardner/Cabrera are playing center?

I swear, if they deal Swisher and then sign Manny to play left, I'm going to beat the hell out of an orphan.

I'm sorry but this wouldn't be fair:

CF Damon
SS Jeter
3B Rodriguez
LF Ramirez
1B Teixeira
DH Matsui
C Posada
RF Nady
2B Cano

That's just. Ugh.

Maybe Swisher for a 5th starter or prospects? Maybe Homer Bailey from the Reds?

I agree with GD, I'd rather keep Nady over Swisher...even though Nady is a free agent after this year...

I follow both the Yankees and the Braves. Atlanta will always be my team but I enjoy watching Yankees baseball too. I liked Nady in New York ever since he was traded there. I think he's a better player than Swisher no doubt but a rental so I expect him to stay. I agree with soupdujour and I think Swisher makes all the since in the world for Atlanta and we've got the prospects to get it done.

I hope Nady gets traded instead of Swisher... haha. His power, patience, and probable comeback (horrible BABIP last year) should be more useful than Nady's career year (huge BABIP, and even that didn't really make him better than Swisher was in Oakland). And Nady should get a better return, depending on the team.

Interesting about Damon in center. If that's the case, they don't even need to trade Nady or Swisher. Really, they don't need to trade either of them anyway, if the price isn't right. But I think everyone's operating under the assumption that Damon would play left. Trading him never would've made sense, and everyone doubts his ability to play center every day, although I think he may be able to (even though his arm is lousy). Has his range dropped off that much? I haven't noticed.

this is just for fun since its never going to happen and I definitely don't want it to happen....but what if the Yankees signed Manny, he obviously bats 4th, do the Yanks put Arod or Tex batting 3rd. I personally would bat Tex 3rd and Arod 5th since Arod is a blowhard

Swisher is def the best fit. i dont know what all this talk is of him blocking Heyward when Heyward IMO is def 2 years away at least. unless he is in AA next year hitting .400 then in AAA at the end of the year still hitting over .300 or something then maybe 2010.

However that is highly unlikely he will most likely start out in A then promote to AA at the end of the year then AA and AAA in 2010 so he def wont be blocking Heyward.

in 2011 he can platoon and if he is ready then give him the job and trade Swisher at the 2011 deadline.

How about instead of Redmond,Manny Acosta or Kris Medland

Why would they put Damon in Center? isnt Melky their main CF?

yanks09... Manny obviously doesn't bat fourth in that situation. He bats fifth, with Teixeira getting on base all the time in front of A-Rod, and Manny as protection. A-Rod is at his best when he doesn't overexert himself and expand his strike zone. With Manny behind him, he would never have to. Even though I think Manny is slightly overrated, he provides the best protection in baseball because of it. Batting A-Rod fifth wouldn't make sense at all.

That said, I don't advocate signing Manny, but it would put the offense through the roof. Unfortunately, the payroll and drama would go too.

"I swear, if they deal Swisher and then sign Manny to play left, I'm going to beat the hell out of an orphan."

Scribbletone, surely there is a better way of getting your point across.

I never want to see Damon in center again. Watching someone like David Ortiz going from first-third on a single to center is too tough to watch

"I hope Nady gets traded instead of Swisher... haha. His power, patience, and probable comeback (horrible BABIP last year) should be more useful than Nady's career year (huge BABIP, and even that didn't really make him better than Swisher was in Oakland). And Nady should get a better return, depending on the team."

Totally agree with this.

Why sell low on Swisher, who is under contract for through 2012, when you can sell high on Nady, whose only under contract for 2009.

Trade Nady for some prospects, DON'T put Damon in center, and call it a day.

i rather see nasdy get traded first the yanks we get more in return also i feel his season was a fluke, and might as well get talent for him since he is a free agent after the season

Why dont the Yankee's get Dunn instead of Manny? He's cheaper, younger, just as bad of a fielder, will hit just as many HR's and statistically is a young Giambi

Seriously what is wrong with you people. Yanks will not sign Manny, they are not trying to clear salary, they do not need any pitching (aside from a #5 starter which can easily be gotten in FA instead of giving up an asset. The only way they make a trade is if they were getting a decent CF in return (thats not Randy Winn) or a good catching prospect. I could also see a top notch pitching prospect like Homer Bailey, that they could package if the deals not right for their needs.

They don't need a corner outfielder or DH they have too many players that cant field and play those positions as is.

I dont understand why the Yankees would trade Nady or Swisher. I put it like this... the outfield is set. Damon starts in left, gardner and melky platoon in center (or one wins starting position with other one in minors), nady gets right. Matsui can be a backup LF and start as DH. Keep Swisher because he can give Damon a rest because Damon struggles to play for a long streak of games, and also keep swisher because we can use him as DH with Matsui as well as a backup first basemen instead of wasting a roster spot with a minor league player, which will give Miranda more time to develop down there. Eventually, the Yanks will trade Miranda for good prospects because Miranda will be a very solid ball player but they wont have room for him with Tex at first.

scribbletone, I'm glad we're on the same page. I was thinking the same thing about how putting Damon in center would get rid of the surplus, and I had the thought about Manny, but I can't imagine they would do that. That would be Hank stepping way over his bounds. Cashman knows better than that, and I think Gardner has a chance to contribute both offensively and defensively, even though everyone's selling him short.

Also, for reasons stated above, if we did get Manny, it should go Tex/A-Rod/Manny. I'd put money on it.

drumzalicious, he's also less of a pain in the ass. I was thinking that we should get Dunn to play first if we didn't get Teixeira, but if Damon plays center, he could become the DH. Matsui would be better in left, or they'd split time. Regardless, I'd rather them use the money on Pettitte (or Lowe or Sheets). Next year, they'll need to rebuild the outfield, and they could use some flexibility.

Somehow I think all of this is moot because I don't think Damon will be playing center.

A perfect trade for the yanks would be Nady and either Cabrera or Kennedy to the Giants for Arron Rowand.

Yanks don't need pitching prospect thats one area they are stacked.

drumzalicious,

where would you put dunn? it would make no sense in signing him

a4m2, I agree that they don't have to trade any of them, but if they can get good value for Nady, why not? Then even if one of Gardner/Melky wins the job, the other can hang around as a defensive replacement late in the game instead of wasting time in the minors. (Ideally, Gardner would play center and Melky would come off the bench, in my mind.) I like that arrangement better than having Swisher come off the bench; he's better than that.

Also, Miranda, who will likely now never be more than a prospect for the Yankees (unless he moves to the outfield?), wouldn't be traded for prospects. Trades don't tend to work that way. He'd more likely be packaged for a player that the Yankees need later on.

Matsui cant play the field, Damon will play LF if he's not dealt, he cant play center anymore.

"Eventually, the Yanks will trade Miranda for good prospects because Miranda will be a very solid ball player"

Whoa. Don't get too ahead of yourself.

I've never heard/read anything from a single scout who thought that Juan Miranda could become a quality everyday first baseman.

He'll be 26 in April, and even though he posted a good .384 OBP in his first shot in AAA last season, he also didn't show great power for a first baseman.

At this point, Miranda is likely a solid bench bat.

Think Shelley Duncan.

"A perfect trade for the yanks would be Nady and either Cabrera or Kennedy to the Giants for Arron Rowand."

Oh my..

The Yankees should NEVER trade for Aaron Rowand.

Hell, nobody should ever trade for Rowand and his contract.

Rowand was a BELOW average defensive CF last year that posted a 94 OPS+, his third sub 95 OPS+ in the last four years!!!!!

The guy still has 4/44 (!) left on his stupid deal, which runs until he's 34.

The Giants probably would dump Rowand's contract on the first team who asked about him, but I doubt any team would spend anywhere near 4/44 on a player like Rowand.

If anything, the Yankees should go after Winn. He plays a solid CF, has plus speed and solid power, and he is a good professional hitter that makes contact and gets on base. Even better, he's only under contract through 2009.


Article says Cashman is listening to offers, not that he's shopping either of the two. If one of them were to elave I would think Nady would be the one considering he's a Boras client headed into FA and will probably not sign an extension, and would come at a higher price in an open market. I think the idea is that Melky or Cabrera would get the job as opening day CF with Damon filling in oocasionaly and playing LF full time. I can't see the Yanks making this deal unless a) Man-NY is in the picture and b) If someone makes an offer they can't refuse, most likely for a couple of good position player prospects (SS and OF).

A perfect trade for the yanks would be Nady and Kennedy/Hughes and prospect for arroyo and Phillips then trade cano for kemp

only reason i was saying dunn was if they truly wanted to go sign another big bat and since manny and dunn would do the same thing in the same position thats why mentioned him

the yanks dont need a manny in the lineup nor do they need a position play however, cf would be nice so if the yanks trade nady i would look for a 5th starter or cf

"A perfect trade for the yanks would be Nady and Kennedy/Hughes and prospect for arroyo and Phillips then trade cano for kemp"

Unless that deal is Nady, Hughes and Jackson/Montero for Arroyo and Phillips, with the Yankees eating everything, then the Reds wouldn't even consider it. Hell, they may even laugh in Cashman's face. Hard.

your right just putting it out there

dump both nady and swisher and sign MANNY!!!!

redsox sign smoltz we sign MANNY!!!!!!!

As a yankee fan I would never make that trade, Jackson and Hughes will be the two best players in that group in five years, by far.

hughes and a jackson to pirates for mclouth! deal off nady and swisher, AND SIGN MANNY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Hey, I have a pretty wild and wacky idea for you Yankee fans.

How about just don't trade Jackson and Hughes..?

I can't believe there are people who root for the Yankees that actually think that the Yankees would somehow be better off trading a superior, younger, longer controlled player (Swisher), just to keep the older, inferior, league average guy coming off a career year who is a free agent next year and is repped by Scott Boras. I guess those are the same guys who want to trade Hughes and Jackson. The problem with most baseball fans is that Brian Cashman made a wonderful deal to acquire Swisher, and most Yankee fans just shrug it off and say "ahh, he hit .230 last year, who cares?"

Yankees Remaining Offseason Moves:

1. Forget Andy Pettitte and let Phil Hughes, Ian Kennedy, Phil Coke, and Alfredo Aceves compete for the 5th spot
2. Trade Xavier Nady to the Atlanta Braves for Manny Acosta + a top high reward prospect (similar to what we gave up in Jose Tabata)
3. Trade Nick Swisher to the Reds for Homer Bailey (two guys who had down years last season and need a change of scenery)
4. Sign Manny Ramirez
5. Hold on to Ajax!!!

I also love the Hughes/Kennedy thing when somebody is making a trade proposal, as if Hughes and Kennedy are even remotely similar.

"Why sell low on Swisher, who is under contract for through 2012, when you can sell high on Nady, whose only under contract for 2009.

Trade Nady for some prospects, DON'T put Damon in center, and call it a day."

We don't do the whole buy low/sell high thing in NY Scribble. We want whoever was the best last year. We want anybody who had a down year shipped out. Eat their whole salary if necessary. Carl Pavano throws up 185 innings of 3.40/1.20 ball next year? Give him 4 more years Cash. Johan goes 12-10 with a 3.75 era? Ship his ass out baby. Thats how we roll.

"Why would they put Damon in Center? isnt Melky their main CF?"

Damon: .303/.375/.461
Melky: .250/.300/.340
Even in 2007, Damon's worst year in a very long time, his numbers would appear Ruthian is being compared to Melky Cabrera.

That is why. And for all the talk about Melky's glove, it really isn't all that good. He has a good arm, and makes some fancy looking places, but he doesn't cover a ton of ground and he takes some weird routes to the ball. Damon is still a top 5 leadoff hitter, with a chance that he is the best one. Very good offensive player.

With the current surplus of available outfielders, I doubt Cashman will find anyone willing to trade anything of value for either Nady or Swisher. I'm surprised they even got Swisher to begin with.

I agree w/ scribbs & nrmax. I like Nady but if a need to move one of the corners were was a "must do" then Nady's the guy. If he wasn't a FA w/ Boras as a client then maybe it would make sense to hold on to him, but we have zero chance of extending him and if he hits the open market then do we really want to bid for his services? Meanwhile, Swisher's a little younger, relatively inexpensive, under contract for a few years and more versatile. That being said I don't think we MUST move either unless Man-NY somehow exists as a strong possibility or someone offers us a prospect or two we can't say no on.

That being said, to all Reds followers, of the following which two could the Yanks possibly get for Nady?

Chris Valaika-SS
Josh Roenicke-Relief Pitcher
Homer Bailey-SP
Matthew Maloney-sp
Daniel Ray Herrera- Relief Pitcher
Bryan Petersen-RF
John Raynor-LF
Chris Mobley-Relief Pitcher
Chris Heisey-CF
Todd Frazier-SS
Ramon Geronimo-Relief Pitcher
Jeremy Horst-SP

The Yanks beleive, and I agree to an extent, that Melky and/or Gardner might prove themselves capable of holding down the CF for at least the 2009 season, with Damon or Swisher available to take over if needed. I don't think the Yanks need to make too many more big moves. I certainly don't think we need to trade either Swisher or Nady for a #5 starter like Washburn, who someone mentioned. If it's not Pettitte or Sheets on a short term deal then I think you can let the kids fight for a spot. I'd rather see one of them in their vs a guy like Washburn who's going to put up a 5.00 era.

The logical conclusion to draw from the presumed attempt to trade Swisher and/or Nady is that they're making room on the roster for Manny. The idea that Dunn would be pursued instead doesn't take into account the Steinbrenner personality. I think it should really be taken into account that the Yankees are moving into the new park and the new leadership wants to carry on the tradition the right way and win it for George. As things stand right now, a great year from Tampa and Boston puts the Yanks out in the cold again. I really think they are going to do everything possible to avoid that scenario this debut season at the new field. And doing everything possible would pretty much mean getting Manny. With him they will be the center of the world again, both on the diamond and off. Without him, they are a really talented team. Big difference in the media capital of the world.

Drama aside, it would be a brilliant baseball move. Manny will play with total fire in NY, and Arod and Tex will be able to go about their business without being as hounded---they both would prefer that.

@ scribbletone


That just gave me a warm fuzzy.

hahaha

YanksFanSince78 -
You left Drew Stubbs off that list, I can see Nady and a mid level prospect for Stubbs and Bailey. But again the only reason they get Bailey is to use him (or Hughes, or Kennedy) for another trade.

Judge,
The Reds will not give up Stubbs and Bailey for a guy with only a year left on his deal. As fast as Stubbs ascended to AAA last year, I think the Reds feel he's the CF of the future.

Obviously Bailey's been mentioned in a lot of trade rumors, primarily Dye. If there's that much smoke, there's fire. He could be had.

I've also seen Roenicke's name in a rumor or two. I like him, but the Reds have pretty decent young relievers on the 25 man now.

I don't see them dealing Valaika or Frazier at this point. I think they're pretty high on Heisey too.

If the Reds trade, they'll probably target Swisher.

JudgeNY-

No way the Reds give up both Stubbs and Bailey unless that prospect is Jackson.

Both of those guys are valuable young pieces. Bailey is a former elite prospect that has fallen from grace but still has huge potential, and Stubbs is a very good CF prospect in the Mike Cameron mold (good D, power, speed, lots of K's).

There's no reason to think they'd ever give up those guys for a one year rental like Nady, who's quite likely to hit the market with Boras as his agent.

How about this one:

Nady and Kennedy for Arroyo and Bailey.

Yanks get a veteran fifth starter and a prospect with far more upside than Kennedy.

The Reds get Nady for the outfield and Kennedy could get a shot at the five spot in their rotation, unless they give it to Micah Owings. The Reds also get to save some cash by shedding Arroyo in this deal.

I think MOST of what Heyman said was BS. Damon will NOT be playing CF. Matsui is untradable? Really? Nobody in the AL could use a DH on a ONE YEAR deal that hits .295 25 100 every year? He already said he WOULD waive his no-trade if it would help everyone involved.

Next, why would the Yankees trade ANY OF's? Matsui is the DH, Damon in LF, Gardner in CF, Nady in RF, Swisher backing up all three plus Tex at 1B. There are injuries all the time people...we need depth and a BENCH for a change. The Sox just signed Penny and are close with Smoltz and Baldelli. They are all nice signings to provide depth.

Finally, all of you saying the Yankees need to trade Nady and Swish and put Manny in LF and Damon in CF are INSANE. That would be the worst outfield D in the history of MLB. If my grandmother hits one in the gap, it's a triple with that D.

I can see the Yankees making a trade with the Reds and then shipping one of the players off to the Royals in exchange for David DeJesus and Zack Grienke...

Yankees Get:
Homer Bailey SP
Drew Stubbs OF

Reds Get:
Xavier Nady OF

Then the Yankees turn around and offer the Royals a package invlolvng Zack Grienke and David DeJesus...

Yakees Get:
Zack Grienke SP
David DeJesusOF

Royals Get:
Drew Stubbs OF
Homer Bailey SP
Ian Kennedy SP
Nick Swisher 1B
Melky Cabrera OF

The Yankees get an Ace in the 5th spot and a proven CF who will hit for average and has a lot of pop

The Reds get the OF they need in Xavier Nady for very cheap considering who the Yankees gave up for him (Jose Tabata)

The Royals get a lot of high upside prospects like (Homer Bailey, Ian Kennedy, and Drew Stubbs) plus Nick Swisher as a veteran presence could allow them to move Jose Guillen and Melky Cabrera can be a 4th outfielder with a lot of upside. He could also platoon with Coco Crisp and take over when Crisp is a free agent next year.

Yikes I'd do the first part, but thats a bit to much for Grinke and DeJesus, you'd need to take one player out thats not Melky.

Jackson has way more value at this point than Bailey or Stubbs so that would be a no. I could maybe see them going as high as Kennedy/Nady for Bailey/Stubbs

I also wouldn't compare Stubbs to Cameron, he has no where near his power or speed, but will hit for a much higher avg. and not strike out near as much. Hes more like Aaron Rowand or Eric Byrnes, but with more speed, and a better glove.

I would consider the the Bailey/Arroyo for Nady/Kennedy.

Yankees are not signing Manny, only way that would ever work is if they could some how get rid of Matsui and put him at DH, and thats not going to happen. having an OF of Manny, Damon, and Nady, would mean every decently hit fly ball would be a hit, poor CC and AJ will have 5.something ERAs.

Post a comment

This weblog only allows comments from registered users. To comment, please Sign In.


Top Stories



Search MLBTR

Lijit Search

MLBTR Mailing List

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


MLBTR Features



Recent Posts



Rumors By Team



Monthly Archives


Live Chats


Tuesdays at 2 p.m. CST



Site Map     Contact     About     Advertise     Privacy Policy     Widget     Fantasy     Rss Feed


MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com.