![]() |
|
|
| |
« Rays Ink Adam Kennedy To Minor League Deal | Main | Brewers Sign Eric Gagne »
MLB Trade Rumors is finally on Twitter. Our name is @mlbtraderumors. Or, here. I'm new to this. How can MLBTR best use Twitter? I've set up Twitterfeed to show our new headlines.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
Is MLB Trade Rumors on Myspace?
Posted by: RODNEY SUCKS | February 17, 2009 at 08:16 PM
Hey Tim, I just posted to you on Twitter. I'm new to it to, and just don't understand the point of it... short, no-content posts... but maybe I'm missing something! Will keep an eye on it.
Posted by: AtlantaMike | February 17, 2009 at 08:17 PM
No, just Facebook.
Posted by: Tim Dierkes | February 17, 2009 at 08:17 PM
Is it possible to put a share button on the bottem of a story so a person can put it on there facebook or email the story? I think this would be a good way to pick up more mlbtr contributers.
Posted by: Benny34 | February 17, 2009 at 08:26 PM
Twitter is a pretty good place to 1) boost traffic to your blog if you post the links in your 'tweets,' and 2) keep up to date with other journalists/baseball people that update twitter with links to their blogs, columns, etc.
Posted by: Durkadurka | February 17, 2009 at 08:27 PM
As far as keeping up with things, what does Twitter offer that an RSS feed doesn't?
Posted by: Tim Dierkes | February 17, 2009 at 08:28 PM
Tim, RE: Facebook... have you heard about their new Terms of Service? Basically they take an unrestricted worldwide license (with rights to sublicense) for EVERYTHING you post/upload. Just a friendly heads-up.
http://consumerist.com/5150175/facebooks-new-terms-of-service-we-can-do-anything-we-want-with-your-content
As for Twitter: a lot of your updates could be summarized pretty well in 140 characters, so I guess you could make posts there - maybe a truncated version and a tinyurl link to the related article, and then have a more detailed version on the website?
Or better yet, have a short version on Twitter with a link that sends the reader straight to a more detailed version here on the site. That way if there people could click through for more if they wanted, or just take the "Lite" version.
Posted by: metafrantic | February 17, 2009 at 08:30 PM
I guess what I am grappling with it, who would be on Twitter instead of the site itself? It's always gonna be on the website first.
I don't really post much on Facebook so that will probably be OK.
Posted by: Tim Dierkes | February 17, 2009 at 08:34 PM
Just on the topic of twitter, Justin Morneau, or at least his official site, follows me on Twitter.
Posted by: HouseThatKirbyBuilt | February 17, 2009 at 08:35 PM
From my experience, to be successful on Twitter, you need to be engaging and interactive. If all you do is just publish your blog posts as a feed, you are not going to get many followers.
I constantly ask questions to my followers, and they answer me back. And I answer them back. Therefore, my followers' followers see our correspondence in their own timelines and then decide to follow me.
If you take the time to generate and answer "viewer mail", you will find Twitter to be a valuable tool to build your brand.
Posted by: coffeewithian | February 17, 2009 at 09:03 PM
Tim, here's my desire: leave MLBTR for your main work, and use Twitter to post your more informal, personal thoughts about your work.
You maintain an excellent neutral disposition here, and I'd be interested in hearing what you really think more often! Twitter could be a great place to do that.
I come here several times a day to find what you have dug up. If you merely post headlines of what's here, I won't follow you.
But if you do something else unique on Twitter that piques my interest, I'll eagerly follow you. I'm following you now, and will look forward to seeing how you use it.
Posted by: trustinglife | February 17, 2009 at 09:17 PM
I like the idea of putting opinion-type stuff and asking questions on Twitter. Could be a complement to the chats.
Posted by: Tim Dierkes | February 17, 2009 at 09:28 PM
who here thinks tht the rays r vastly underrated and the fact tht all the yankees did wit sabathia is replace mussina and burnett was severly overpriced and texiera was their best signin even though it wasnt a necessary one and the yankees wont make the playoffs?
Posted by: marc | February 17, 2009 at 09:38 PM
What the hell is twitter?
Posted by: NedCollettiClueless | February 17, 2009 at 11:38 PM
"
who here thinks tht the rays r vastly underrated and the fact tht all the yankees did wit sabathia is replace mussina and burnett was severly overpriced and texiera was their best signin even though it wasnt a necessary one and the yankees wont make the playoffs?
Posted by: marc | February 17, 2009 at 09:38 PM
"
Marc Southworth? The WBL Rays fan Southworth?!
Posted by: aj58078 | February 17, 2009 at 11:42 PM
according to wikipedia.com Twitter is..
"Twitter is a social networking and micro-blogging service that allows its users to send and read other users' updates (known as tweets), which are text-based posts of up to 140 characters in length."
there is alot more information on wikipedia..
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twitter
im just looking up about it now, but i guess as its text used it works using the text on your cell phone? i guess its like a test message but instead of being sent to just the one person its sent to everyone on your twitter list all at the same time? you then can get that information right away using your cell phone where as a website you have to check on your own time for new information posted?
as for having it through this website, i assume you have to have MLBTR on your twitter list? and those who dont wont be able to get that information?
if one puts new information on twitter that information would not be on the site? so if one uses twitter for new information about baseball related information would it be better to just put the basic information on twitter but the more in detailed information on the actual website? then people can know right away there would be baseball information posted but have to actually check the website to see what it is?
Posted by: SpecialFNK | February 18, 2009 at 05:22 AM
according to wikipedia.com Twitter is..
"Twitter is a social networking and micro-blogging service that allows its users to send and read other users' updates (known as tweets), which are text-based posts of up to 140 characters in length."
there is alot more information on wikipedia..
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twitter
im just looking up about it now, but i guess as its text used it works using the text on your cell phone? i guess its like a test message but instead of being sent to just the one person its sent to everyone on your twitter list all at the same time? you then can get that information right away using your cell phone where as a website you have to check on your own time for new information posted?
as for having it through this website, i assume you have to have MLBTR on your twitter list? and those who dont wont be able to get that information?
if one puts new information on twitter that information would not be on the site? so if one uses twitter for new information about baseball related information would it be better to just put the basic information on twitter but the more in detailed information on the actual website? then people can know right away there would be baseball information posted but have to actually check the website to see what it is?
Posted by: SpecialFNK | February 18, 2009 at 05:26 AM
Yeah, don't just duplicate headlines on Twitter. That would be pointless. That is what RSS is for. Be interactive, give opinions, etc like others have said.
Maybe your week in review links would be good to post to Twitter in addition to your other content that is not just a duplicate of the blog.
Posted by: BravesFan | February 18, 2009 at 11:34 AM