 |
|
|
| |
« Braves, Tom Glavine Reach Agreement | Main | Odds & Ends: Boras, Cordero, NCAA Agents »
Neal Discusses Ayala, Cruz, Cordero
8:48 Neal has another update, reporting that Ayala's contract is indeed guaranteed. Ayala will get the previously-reported $1.3MM base salary, along with $250K of appearance incentives. $50K for 50 appearance, and then another $50K for every five games after that - up to 70 games.
Ayala also has bonuses for finishing games, which would require an injury to All-Star closer Joe Nathan. He also has bonuses for making the All-Star team, winning ALCS or World Series MVP honors, or finishing in the Top 3 of the Rolaids Relief Award.
Aside from his appearance incentives, none seem plausible. Nothing further on Cruz or Cordero in this update.
9:52am: La Velle E. Neal III of the Minneapolis Star-Tribune learned that newly-signed reliever Luis Ayala does not have a guaranteed contract:
The Twins can cut Ayala up until 16 days before Opening Day and be on the hook for just 1/6th of his $1.3MM salary [about $217K]. If they cut him 15 days from the first pitch on in, they are on the hook for about 1/4th of the salary [$325K]. The Twins have a little protection if Ayala doesn’t have a good spring.
That's good to hear, because Ayala wasn't really deserving of a guaranteed contract based on his '08 and the current market. Neal also has more on Juan Cruz:
If Cruz is moved as part of a sign and trade deal, Arizona is out a first-round pick and sandwhich round pick as compensation. That should influence the types of players the D'Backs would want in return for Cruz. It also stands to reason that several teams, and not just the Twins, would be in on Cruz if draft picks aren’t a factor. But there are indications that Arizona can’t just sit back and demand a lot for Cruz. Cruz is making noises about sitting out until after the June draft, so Arizona would get nothing for compensation once Cruz signs with a club. So there’s motivation on their part to get something in return for him. The Twins have made a call to the league office to check on the change in the sign-and-trade rules. If they haven’t already been informed of the changes they should know today.
Sitting out is Cruz's only leverage...is he bluffing? A bit more on the relief front: Neal was unable to confirm that the Twins attended Chad Cordero's audition yesterday.
Comments
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Top Stories
Search MLBTR
MLBTR Features
Recent Posts
Rumors By Team
Monthly Archives
Live Chats
Tuesdays at 2 p.m. CST
I don't think Cruz is bluffing. He should be in great demand come June when all it will take is money to sign him.
Posted by: kinsler5 | February 19, 2009 at 10:03 AM
I know I've said this before, but why is Juan Cruz not a Yankee? They would get him cheap relative to his expected value and only give up a 4th round draft pick.
Posted by: BigScooter | February 19, 2009 at 10:07 AM
I don't know, I think Ayala is deserving of a guaranteed contract; I was actually surprised when the Mets didn't offer him arbitration. He wasn't perfect, and gave up a few games, but he was gutty down the stretch for the Mets, and showed myself and quite a few Mets fans a little something. I wouldn't mind at all were he in camp with the Mets.
Posted by: Harold | February 19, 2009 at 12:28 PM
Want to know why only 3 people have commented on this blog? You're middle relievers. No one cares. Shut it and pitch.
Posted by: GScott | February 19, 2009 at 09:31 PM
Does it matter if he's bluffing?
He wont have many options because nobody is going to give up the draft pick...
Apparently not even the Yankees, who btw, are not gonna even be involved in this years draft i guess
Posted by: Green Grove | February 19, 2009 at 11:16 PM
Personally, I think a sign and trade should only be for the 1st rounder. The team losing the Type A free agent should still keep their sandwich pick.
The whole point of this thing is removing an objection that is keeping Type A free agents from getting signed.
If a team has to compensate for two draft picks instead of just the one, it will be much harder to pull off a deal and increases the chance that no deal would be made - which, like I said, is the whole point.
Posted by: sploorp | February 20, 2009 at 01:12 AM