![]() |
|
|
| |
« Discussion: Midseason Trade Candidates | Main | Harry Kalas Passes Away »
A look at Jon Heyman's new column at SI.com...
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
The genius, Jon Heyman, is at it again.
Bonifacio is batting .500 in all of SIX games this year, and already Heyman is praising the Marlins?
The guy had a career line of .285/.341/.362 in the minors, and because he's hit well in six games, suddenly he's an emerging star?
The Marlins traded a young, durable, cheap lefty starter and a good platoon bat, and all they got in return was Bonifacio and two low level minor leaguers with limited upside.
That doesn't sound praise-worthy to me..
Bonifacio will be batting .240 in two weeks..
Posted by: scribbletone | April 13, 2009 at 12:43 PM
No surprise Heyman would be praising a guy after a week. He's just a moron with sources.
Posted by: icedrake523 | April 13, 2009 at 12:52 PM
I just think it's unreal to read that article, which gives Bonifacio and the Marlins so much freaking credit, just a week into the season..
You're talking about a guy who's followed and written about baseball for years, and yet he never thought about the concept of sample sizes, and the fact that even mediocre players can get hot from time to time?
It boggles my mind that Heyman can so quickly come to the conclusion that the scouting world was wrong about Bonifacio after years of scouting him, just from a single good week.
Posted by: scribbletone | April 13, 2009 at 12:56 PM
I definitely agree with both of you here. Bonifacio is just a speedster with no other skills. He'll be in AAA before the year is over.
Posted by: kgbaseball | April 13, 2009 at 12:56 PM
If only we could send Heyman to AAA
Posted by: exitfare | April 13, 2009 at 01:02 PM
"The Marlins traded a young, durable, cheap lefty starter and a good platoon bat, and all they got in return was Bonifacio and two low level minor leaguers with limited upside"
Are you kidding me? A young durable cheap lefty starter!? What are you on? Olsen is a head case who gives up more walks than innings pitched. On a team that has money constraints, having a club house cancer, arbitration eligible, 6-10 win pitcher, command pitcher with no command who tops out at 91mph, getting anything in return is a plus.
Additionaly, Willingham was arbitration eligible, injury prone, and streaky at best. Hes a 5th outfield right now for the 0-6 Nationals, maybe the worst team ever. There is a reason why the Marlins traded Willingham over Hermida (Hermida is nothing to brag about either, until he proves himself).
As such, benefacio has tremendous upside. He offers the marlins speed (hes the faster player in baseball btw) which they lacked last year. He offers them a defensive upgrade b/c they can move cantu to first, and if he can get an on base percentage anything over .300 he helps the marlins manufacture runs drastically.
In further support of the trade, is the fact that uggla will most likely be gone next season which gives the marlins another option at second, Benefacio's natural position.
Don't question Beinfest and Hill, ever. I think its safe to say their track record speaks for itself.
1997, 2003, 2009. This is the year of the fish. And the Dynasty continues..
Posted by: Marlins Dynasty | April 13, 2009 at 01:11 PM
If only we could send Heyman to AAA
Posted by: exitfare | April 13, 2009 at 01:02 PM
-------------
I's thinking the Atlantic League but AAA is good too..haha
Some rather sad news again. Baseball has lost another member of it's family. Harry Kalas was found passed out in the booth at the Phils game today. He was taken to the hospital, where he died.
Acoording to ESPN.
RIP
Harry Kalas. You will be missed!
Posted by: Braves for NL East!! | April 13, 2009 at 01:13 PM
A .300 OPS doesn't help drastically..what are you on?
Posted by: Braves for NL East!! | April 13, 2009 at 01:17 PM
It's way,WAY too early to label a winner in the trade,however, as scribbletone said, Bonafacio will wind hitting .240 next week and he's on the bench/Triple-A.
Posted by: Braves for NL East!! | April 13, 2009 at 01:24 PM
I like heyman but the next time he says anything good about the Nats will be the first. check out his archive. He uses every opportunity to call them a joke. Not saying I disagree with a lot of it, it just seems like Heyman has really been rubbed the wrong way with them.
Posted by: nats apologist | April 13, 2009 at 01:26 PM
Harry Kalas collasped while in the booth and they found him at 12:30. i guess for a man like that to pass away in the booth is where he would want to go out.
RIP Harry you will be missed.
Posted by: derman1984 | April 13, 2009 at 01:26 PM
"The guy had a career line of .285/.341/.362 in the minors, and because he's hit well in six games, suddenly he's an emerging star?"
In general i agree with the sentiment that Heyman is definitely jumping the gun... That being said, minor league stats mean little.
Have you ever looked at the numbers Hanley Ramirez put up in the minors for example? I'm obviously not saying Bonifacio is even close to Hanley in ability though, just that he's an example of someone who performed better as the competition improved.
Posted by: gfulla | April 13, 2009 at 01:28 PM
I never will forget what Ralph Nador said. When he asked the Washington Post to sponsor(??) him, they said no. He asked why and they said cause you have no chance of winning. He then asked them then why do cover the Nationals.
Posted by: Braves for NL East!! | April 13, 2009 at 01:31 PM
The contrast between Rosenthal and Heyman is that Rosenthal is an intelligent guy who understands the game, and Heyman says "ooh, inside the park home run!! Marlins are so smart!!! OMG!!".
Posted by: bobo | April 13, 2009 at 03:47 PM
"The Marlins traded a young, durable, cheap lefty starter and a good platoon bat, and all they got in return was Bonifacio and two low level minor leaguers with limited upside."
Dean and Smolinksi have more than limited upside. They aren't top specs, but, they're not scrubs.
Smolinski has a career BB/K of 0.56, he'll hit for average and put up a nice OBP. Scouts also believe he'll be developing gap power. The problem right now is his injury, but also that his defense is in question. If he can stay at second base, he's valuable. If he's stuck in LF, he's value plummets. Marlins believe he'll stay at 2b.
Dean isn't as good of a spec as Smolinksi, but he has a 92 MPH fastball with room to grow, already posses a plus curve, and has a developing change.
Also, Emilio isn't horrible. One of the main things is that he's significantly better against RHP than LHP. He should be able to maintain a low-to-mid .700 OPS against RHP, which, when combined with his defense and speed, would make him an average to above average 2B. The problem is against LHP and if he can turn it around against them.
When you consider the fact that Scott Olsen needs to stop being overrated (he's posted back to back FIPs over 5, and check how he's done so far this year. Dude is done) and that Josh Willingham has major injury concerns, that's not a horrible haul.
When you the consider what the Angels and Rays were offering the Nats for the two, you then see that the Marlins did better than that. Angels were basically offering nothing for Olsen, and Rays were offering Hammel for Hammer.
Posted by: Nny | April 13, 2009 at 04:56 PM
Idk, I kinda dig Emilio Bonifacio but I dig him the same way I did Carlos Gomez last year. He'll flame out near the end of May. Just like Gomez. :p
Posted by: la16 | April 14, 2009 at 01:29 AM
"Idk, I kinda dig Emilio Bonifacio but I dig him the same way I did Carlos Gomez last year. He'll flame out near the end of May. Just like Gomez. :p"
You really can't compare Carlos Gomez and Emilio Bonifacio.
Gomez was still one of the best defensive CFers, if not the best defensive CF in baseball last year. If he can even remotely improve with the bat, he's a keeper.
Posted by: melonis rex | April 14, 2009 at 09:25 AM
The Marlins could have gotten more for Olsen and Willingham, but remember, the Fish also could have ended up getting a lot less. The Nats NEED to flip Olsen and Willingham midseason, or as soon as someone gets desperate for pitching and offensive help. For Olsen: White Sox, Mets, Angels, any other team that might be in it midseason that gets desperate for pitching (Mariners if the A's/Angels struggle). Willingham to Braves makes a ton of sense as well.
I want to say if Willingham is a Nat at the end of the 2009 season, the A's should try to acquire him to replace Holliday (Willingham has 2 years after '09 till FA).
Posted by: melonis rex | April 14, 2009 at 09:33 AM