MLB Rumors - MLB Trade Rumors
Subscribe to MLB Trade Rumors using RSS
Home     Contact     About     Advertise     Archives     Widget     Twitter      RSS Usage

« Baby News | Main | Phillies To Pursue One Impact Pitcher »

Baseball Blogs Weigh In: Peavy, Braves, Penny, Francoeur

On this date 20 years ago, Mike Schmidt announced his retirement 42 games into the season. He was still voted to the National League All-Star team, but did not play. Schmidt retired with a career line of .267/.380/.527, 548 home runs and 10 gold gloves. As we approach the 50-game mark of the '09 season, teams are starting to recognize needs and make changes. Let's take a look at what is being written in the Blogosphere...

  • The Fightins make a case for the Phillies going after Jake Peavy.
  • When Sid Slid highlights players the Braves might be able to target in a trade, including Luke Scott, Josh Willingham and Brad Hawpe.
  • Center Field Gate takes a look at a Manny Delcarmen-Nick Johnson swap from a Nats perspective and finds things not to like.  Nats GM Mike Rizzo said the rumor was a fabrication, anyway.
  • The Bottom Line puts together a list of catchers the Red Sox might target in a trade involving Brad Penny or Clay Buchholz.
  • Capitol Avenue Club says it is time for the Braves to shake things up and moving Jeff Francoeur is the key.
  • The Ghost of Moonlight Graham sees a Matt LaPorta for Michael Bowden trade as good for both the Red Sox and Indians.
  • DC Sports Plus takes a look back at the Nationals' recent draft history.

Cork Gaines writes for RaysIndex.com. If you have a suggestion for this feature, Cork can be reached here, and followed on Twitter here.


Comments

thanks Cork for the nod to the best third baseman of all time!!! take that Wright is my boy, lol!!

I can still hear Harry's call (RIP). Michael Jack Schmidt!!

oh and go get Peavy Ruben, just don't spend Drabek AND Brown and try to do it with NEITHER of them. give them a load of Donald, Marson, Worley Carrasco etc.

"The Ghost of Moonlight Graham sees a Matt LaPorta for Michael Bowden trade as good for both the Red Sox and Indians."

You do not trade a future 3/4 hitter for a 3/4 starter.

I would like to see a Bowden for LaPorta deal. I could also see a Bowden for Santana deal with the Indians. The guy who think the Sox would trade Buchholz for Marson is crazy. Buchholz will not be traded for anyone at this point except an Adrian Gonzalez type player.

Capital Ave. Club just had the most ridiculous trade idea ever. That will be the first and last time I ever go to that site.

Capital Ave. Club just had the most ridiculous trade idea ever. That will be the first and last time I ever go to that site.

There's no way the Indians even consider a LaPorta for Bowden swap... that's a truly terrible article.

"Capital Ave. Club just had the most ridiculous trade idea ever. That will be the first and last time I ever go to that site.

Posted by: RaginCajun6 | May 29, 2009 at 04:20 PM"

It was really bad and really long.

I think Dye is the only one leaving that outfield.

When Sid Slid has the most logical and most likely trade targets for the Braves. All would be an upgrade w/ Hawpe being the biggest of those upgrades.

The only name i would add to sid slid's list is DeRosa. If we could get Willingham and one of the other 3 (assuming they can get derosa re-signed) we would be set in the outfield until Heyward and Hernandez come up

It's an admittedly insane article. Take it for what it's worth (not much). More of a fun exercise than a serious trade proposal. I wouldn't have picked it if I were Cork. I'm extremely surprised he did. (I am the author by the way).

Mark DeRosa is still my first choice at this point since he still lives in Atlanta from what I hear, and could sign him and take Norton's roster spot in 2010. My second choice would be J. Pierre after the return of Manny and third would be R. Winn.
Luke Scott, Josh Willingham and Brad Hawpe would be really scraping the bottom of the barrel. I guess Luke Scott wouldn't be so bad.

No way the Orioles move Scott right no. He's still controled for a couple years. He slots in as the Dh with Huff leaving. These are also his most productive years. It would take a high ranking thrid base prospect or ss. If the Angels gace up Brandon Wood that would be more realistic.
Willingham is the best option in my opinion. Slotting him between Jones and Mccann would be very nice.A mid-level pitching prospect would seem like enough to get him. No way Nationals move Dunn. He's really affected Zimerman's approach.
Getting Hawpe would take a whole lot. But if the Braves did get him their outfield would be greatly improved.

joemorgan=#1 is right about Scott, even with the now crowded OF that the O's have, he will be much more valuable once huff is gone

Plus isn't Scott hurt?

Dude Hawpe is much much better than Juan Pierre and Mark Derosa

btw if you get a chance, look at the Nationals recent draft history; 2000- Grady Sizemore, Cliff Lee, Jason Bay, Russel Martin

no PWHjort, Scott is not hurt, in fact he hit 2 HR's last night!

Was he hurt at one point in the year or am I going insane?

That 2000 Expos draft has pretty much nothing to do with the current Nationals. Loria took his whole staff to the Marlins when he switched teams.

And trading LaPorta for Bowden is pretty stupid.

"Luke Scott, Josh Willingham and Brad Hawpe would be really scraping the bottom of the barrel. I guess Luke Scott wouldn't be so bad."

Brad Hawpe is scraping the bottom of the barrel? He's easily the best bitter out of the guys you mentioned.

And Juan Pierre? Really? Since a Diaz/Anderson platoon seems all but assured in LF, you're gonna play Pierre's noodle arm in RF? Good call.

You might want to actually follow baseball before making comments like that.

Scott just came off the DL. As for the Braves I think adding Willingham and DeRosa and then extending DeRosa makes the most sense. That puts two righty bats in a very left heavy lineup while also significantly upgrading the corner OF spots. Adding these two certainly doesn't make the Braves a feared offensive team but if they are league average with that pitching staff then they can make the playoffs

Scott just came off the DL. As for the Braves I think adding Willingham and DeRosa and then extending DeRosa makes the most sense. That puts two righty bats in a very left heavy lineup while also significantly upgrading the corner OF spots. Adding these two certainly doesn't make the Braves a feared offensive team but if they are league average with that pitching staff then they can make the playoffs

Mark DeRosa is still my first choice at this point since he still lives in Atlanta from what I hear, and could sign him and take Norton's roster spot in 2010. My second choice would be J. Pierre after the return of Manny and third would be R. Winn.
Luke Scott, Josh Willingham and Brad Hawpe would be really scraping the bottom of the barrel. I guess Luke Scott wouldn't be so bad.

Posted by: wisbrave | May 29, 2009 at 04:45 PM
--------------

Hahaha...lol. Brad Hawpe would be the 2nb best hitter on the Atl Braves after Jones. Even with just his away numbers alone he would rank near the top in every category:

.275/.359 4 hrs and 10 bb

Those are better numbers than Francouer, Kotchman, Schafer and Anderson.

Braves fan's should rejoice in the streets if they could acquire Hawpe.

PWHjort
Yeah he was for a short stint
.318/.402/.598
he's being paid 2.4mill
That kind of production at that price is hard to come by.

I don't think a Diaz/Anderson platoon in left is all but assured. In fact, I think the organization is probably looking to upgrade left field before they do right field.

The Bottom Line trade possibilities are among the worst ever seen here. Buchholz will not go for any young catcher who is unproven period and neither should Bowden as both are perhaps the 2 best pitchers not in the majors! People here are so jealous of the sox prospects that they cry about "the Boston Hype Machine" yet every prospect of late from masterson, lowrie, delcarmen, lester, pedroia, ellsbury, youk, and papelbon have all exceeded their perceived potential without any flops to be seen other than Craig Hansen.

"Plus isn't Scott hurt?"

he was but has come back strong if not even stronger than before, he is 4 for 8 in his past 2 game back from the dl including 3 HR's in that span along with 2 walks. he also has picked up 7 rbi's in the 2 games since coming back

i have been extremely impressed with his production especialy comin off the dl so far

idk if any of you guys live in the baltimore/dc area and can see the game but once this rain clears up I CANT WAIT TO SEE WIETERS

I didn't suggest he wasn't worth getting, I just thought he was hurt. And it turns out he WAS hurt but currently isn't. Seems like a good fit. But it also seems like we'd have to give up some useful players since the Orioles are near the end of a VERY LONG re-building process.

RED SOX DYNASTY, i am not jealous of the sox prospects, i like mine better

PWHjort, i wouldnt call the orioles rebuilding process very long, it really only started a couple years ago at most, the bedard trade brought in a lot for us: adam jones, george sherril, chris tillman

The Rockies don't seem that high on Murton. Maybe he would be a player the Braves should look at. Murton in right and willingham in left. Both guys have cost controlled years left. Neither would cost an arm and a leg.
2b Johnson/Prado
ss Escobar
3b Jones
Lf Willingham/Diaz
C Mccann/Ross
Rf Murton/Anderson
1b Kotchman/Norton
Cf Schafer

This would be a vast improvement.

The Bottom Line trade possibilities are among the worst ever seen here. Buchholz will not go for any young catcher who is unproven period and neither should Bowden as both are perhaps the 2 best pitchers not in the majors! People here are so jealous of the sox prospects that they cry about "the Boston Hype Machine" yet every prospect of late from masterson, lowrie, delcarmen, lester, pedroia, ellsbury, youk, and papelbon have all exceeded their perceived potential without any flops to be seen other than Craig Hansen.

Posted by: RED SOX DYNASTY! | May 29, 2009 at 05:19 PM
-----------------

(sigh)........

red sox dynasty, ever heard of a guy named Tommy Hanson? There's also Bumgarner on the Giants and a few others in front of Bucholz though he has looked dominant so far. As for Bowden, yeah he's good but he is not an elite pitching prospect

"I don't think a Diaz/Anderson platoon in left is all but assured. In fact, I think the organization is probably looking to upgrade left field before they do right field."

Why? Diaz has been hitting fine for most of the season and still rakes lefties, and Anderson is showing signs of coming on (even though he's shown no power whatsoever).

Failcouer has been a black hole in RF for the last month and has shown no signs of improved plate discipline/pitch recognition from last year, when he was one of the worst players in baseball. What more do we need to see?

RF and CF are the biggest issues here, but CF is going to be much more difficult to upgrade.

Not to mention David Price. Neftali Feliz. Etc... Red Sox Dynasty isn't too big on the whole "try not to be a homer" thing.

DeRosa makes the most sense to me at this point just for the versatility he brings when he can fill in at 3B when Chipper inevitably goes down with more nagging injuries.

Losing Infante and Esco at the same time has been devastating thus far.

im in the same boat as the bigfish and yes i live in the MD/DCarea and cant wait 2 see weiters we are getting some heavy rain though

red sox dynasty im not sure who ur refering 2 i agree alot of the redsox prospects have exceeded expectations

me personaly i wouldnt touch buchholz he's 2 darn inconsistent 4 me, i havent seen much of bowdan

i would be very hesitate 2 trade 4 most red sox prospects atm as they might not like joinin a new team specialy the pitchers goin from a good team like the sox 2 a team rebuilding

not saying they would do that but the team callin the sox better know damn well what there getting

add chris tillman to that list

Derosa is a great option. The only issue I have is that the Indians will require a couple pretty good players. Murton is a very similar player (even though he can't play the infield) and he will cost you about half the talent. He also has controlled years. Derosa's contract is done after this year. Braves need a couple guys to hold down the fort till Heyward is ready.

i don't think CF will be changed, as for left i've thrown this out the past couple of days but over 600 ab's a diaz(250) and chris duncan(350) platoon would produce around
.318/.404/.512/.916 34hr 109rbi that would be the 3rd or 4th most productive LF in baseball

And the braves could get duncan for a guy like redmond and duncan won't block Heyward

"add chris tillman to that list"
The Orioles might be the most exciting team in baseball. Markakis,Jones,Roberts,Reimold,Weiters, are all incredible.
With pitcher like Tillman,Hernandez,Matusz, Arrieta they are going to be awesome next year!
Seeing these guys slowly come is refreshing.

whats goin on with erbe i havent even heard his name mentioned much this season is he hurt

also dont forget snyder

With the injuries the Cards ave had all year I don't see them moving Duncan. It would be nice for the Braves but I think Ankiel will leave next year that would leave an outfield of Ludwick, Rasmus and Duncan. The braves also need right handed hitters.

With the injuries the Cards ave had all year I don't see them moving Duncan. It would be nice for the Braves but I think Ankiel will leave next year that would leave an outfield of Ludwick, Rasmus and Duncan. The braves also need right handed hitters.

Interesting call on Murton. He appears to be raking in Triple A right now. And he's hit just fine in his stops at the show... Why isn't anyone pulling the trigger on this guy?

Erbe is on 7day disabled
BOW EAS 1 3 0.90 4 4 0 0 0 20.0 11 7 2 2 8 19 1.05 .153
still nice numbers

"both are perhaps the 2 best pitchers not in the majors!"

Hanson, Matusz, Tillman, Ethan Martin, Feliz, Wade Davis, Jarrod Parker, The Giants two headed beast, Carrasco, Hanson, Jeffress, Mazzaro, and Lindblom have something to say about that.

" As for Bowden, yeah he's good but he is not an elite pitching prospect"

I always find this interesting when see this written. Bowden has dominated at every stop in his trip through the minors, with the exception of a small struggle as a 20 year old in his 1st, partial season at AA and that was it.

As far who to bring into the braves outfield I am all about Juan Pierre. The guy is lights out. He may not be a home run hitter but his ops is about 1 and he would sure up the lead off spot in atlanta.

Ddger Blue, I'm a Sox fan and agree that the assertion that Bowden and Bucholz are the 2 best pitchers not in the minors is absurd, some of the guys you list is just as bad.

Jeffress has a live arm but that is about all he has going for him thus far.

http://www.thebaseballcube.com/players/J/Jeremy-Jeffress.shtml

Ethan Martin has pitched 40 innings professionally and has a 3.76 era. Nice ceiling/potential but a little early.

Carrasco was pretty bad in double-a and while he was good in a triple-a call-up last year he has struggled mightily this year.

Tillman, Feliz, Hanson, Alderson, Baumgarner, Holland, Anderson are all in the discussion along with Clay (Bowden is polished but has a limited ceiling).

"As far who to bring into the braves outfield I am all about Juan Pierre. The guy is lights out. He may not be a home run hitter but his ops is about 1 and he would sure up the lead off spot in atlanta.

Posted by: Phillip_Cannon | May 29, 2009 at 06:31 PM"

Funny, people said he should not be playing baseball this offseason.

Carrasco is probably just as good as Buchholz. But a year or two behind developmentally.

" As for Bowden, yeah he's good but he is not an elite pitching prospect"

I always find this interesting when see this written. Bowden has dominated at every stop in his trip through the minors, with the exception of a small struggle as a 20 year old in his 1st, partial season at AA and that was it.

Posted by: johns | May 29, 2009 at 06:11 PM
-----------------
You have to look at other factors then just numbers. Bowdens results are great but his stuff isnt great. If your just looking at minor league numbers then Ian Kennedy should be considered one of the 10 best pitchers in the minors seeing as he has absolutely demolished the competition down there. But hes rightfully seen as a number 4 innings eater type starter in the bigs, which is still great and provides a ton of value to a club.

No one is saying that Bowden isnt a good pitcher but to call him one of the best pitchers in the minors is hilarious.

Guess the geniuses here don't understand what "PERHAPS" means when I referenced Bowden and Buchholz as "perhaps the 2 best pitchers not in the majors right now"! Bowden 22, 93 mph fb, has a 1.69 era in 48 innings while giving up only 29 hits. Yeah, I guess he sucks right? Buchholz 25, 96 mph fb, has a 1.31 era in 48 innings while giving up only 24 hits and 12 walks with 49 k's! I'm getting used to my words getting twisted on here but you all look like b!tches every team you wet yourselves over my posts. I never said they were better prospects than Feliz, Baumgarner, or Hanson but they are better than the rest, especially the overrated Carrasco. And btw, Price is already in the majors so he has nothing to do with my comments.

Just remember Braves fans: Kelly Johnson for Ryan Ludwick straight up was on the table but wren said no. just thought i'd throw that out there. <3

If nothing else happens i'd be happy with juan pierre. braves get a true leadoff man, defensive upgrade, a really good tutor and mentor for schafer, and it makes yunal escobar and kelly jonson better as they can now hit 2 and 6 respectively where they are better suited

bravoboy10,
1) Ludwick is hurt. 2) I don't think it ever was. I'm pretty sure both sides wanted more. The Braves wanted Ludwick + prospect for KJ and the Cardinals wanted KJ + bullpen help for Ludwick if I remember correctly. I don't think St. Louis ever said, "we agree to swap Kelly Johnson for Ryan Ludwick straight up" and Frank Wren said "no". I think there were discussions but the framework of the deal couldn't be laid out because each side was over-valuing (or under-valuing) it's piece. Actually, seems like St. Louis got it right or under-valued their side and Atlanta over-valued their side. I was disappointed a deal for Ludwick wasn't done just because he was so perfect for us during the off-season.

The Center Field Gate article would be funny if not for the fact that the writer is apparently serious.

In reference to a Nick Johnson for Manny Delcarmen trade he quips..."The Bosox may need another week to convince themselves of what the rest of us in this part of the galaxy already know:...We can get a better deal, maybe another-player-plus-Delcarmen, in early June."

Beam him up Scotty, looks like his part of the galaxy phasered their brainstems again. The Nats can pretend all they want but they aren't in a position of negotiating superiority for ANYONE at this point, and especially not for a hobbled part-time DH type with an expiring contract soon to depart. Johnson can hit but his bat is only as good as his durability...chalk up another bargaining chip for the other side. CFG (and Rizzo?) thinks Washington should get not one but TWO good young players for Johnson, and be willing to wait it out till' they get it. Cue the raucous laughter.

When it comes to improving their team the Nats haven't been able to negotiate themselves out of an open paper bag. I see no reason for that to change if that CFG article is legit.

Let's go with Hanson, Morton, Parr, Vasquez and KJ for Peavy and Adrian Gonzalez. Peavy and Gonzalez are both only 27. Adrian is locked in for cheap and the Pads already have a backup firstbaseman. As far as Hanson being untouchable he's been great so far in the minors, but the major league hitters are much better so who's to say he'll be as good as has been. And Peavy has proven that he is a dominate big league pitcher. Only problem here is Peavy's arm which I feel like is a year or two from needing Tommy Johns.

"bravoboy10,
1) Ludwick is hurt. 2) I don't think it ever was. I'm pretty sure both sides wanted more. The Braves wanted Ludwick + prospect for KJ and the Cardinals wanted KJ + bullpen help for Ludwick if I remember correctly. I don't think St. Louis ever said, "we agree to swap Kelly Johnson for Ryan Ludwick straight up" and Frank Wren said "no". I think there were discussions but the framework of the deal couldn't be laid out because each side was over-valuing (or under-valuing) it's piece. Actually, seems like St. Louis got it right or under-valued their side and Atlanta over-valued their side. I was disappointed a deal for Ludwick wasn't done just because he was so perfect for us during the off-season."

Yeah ludwick is hurt but when talking about a deal in hinesight you can't talk about injuries because had the deal been made the guy wouldn't have been injured. I'm not saying that to bash you or anything i'm just saying. But yes before the players had settled on arbitration there was talk of a one for one deal, then ludwick settled for 4.3 i believe and wren didn't want to take on the extra 2 mil, because he thought he was going to need it to get the pitchers he was going after.

Let me start by saying I already said I was all for any deal that brought Ludwick to Atlanta and I previously stated that. But I don't think either club agreed in principle to a 1-for-1 swap. There were certainly discussions, but I don't think they got that far. There were no official reports that they got nearly that far and there weren't really any rumors that they got that far either. I will say this. If Wren was unwilling to take on 2 million dollars for Ludwick why was he willing to give Rafael Furcal 3 years / 30 million and move KJ to LF? Of course, maybe the plan was to trade Escobar to someone for a young, cheap starter (I don't buy the KJ in Left thing, I think they were trying to trade Escobar).

I'll be honest..I have zero faith in Wren thus far. Wren will make a move to get an OF, but it will be one that nobody has even thought about and I highly doubt that they will be an upgrade.

If Bowden alone was enough to land LaPorta wouldn't the Giants step in and offer Alderson? Alderson is much higher on most prospect rankings and I'd bet the Giants would be willing to throw in another decent prospect (Pucetas? Fairley?) if they had to, for a prospect who could probably start at 1B and hit in the middle part of the order immediately. This seems like another Sox-fan dream trade scenario. I'm sure they could get Gamel and Escobar for Bowden too.

"No one is saying that Bowden isnt a good pitcher but to call him one of the best pitchers in the minors is hilarious. "

We will find out agin when either the Sox finally call him up for good, or he is traded for a large piece in a trade CosaoneNYC, just how good he really is then.

One MAJOR difference between Bowden and Kennedy, is his FB is 5-6mph faster and it's easier to hide a mistake at 95mph.

If Bowden alone was enough to land LaPorta wouldn't the Giants step in and offer Alderson? Alderson is much higher on most prospect rankings and I'd bet the Giants would be willing to throw in another decent prospect (Pucetas? Fairley?) if they had to, for a prospect who could probably start at 1B and hit in the middle part of the order immediately. This seems like another Sox-fan dream trade scenario. I'm sure they could get Gamel and Escobar for Bowden too.

Posted by: BLB | May 29, 2009 at 08:51 PM
-----------
Thats not nearly enough BLB, the Indians would have to include Sizemore as well, havent you seen Bowdens stats they are prolific!!!!!

"No one is saying that Bowden isnt a good pitcher but to call him one of the best pitchers in the minors is hilarious. "

We will find out agin when either the Sox finally call him up for good, or he is traded for a large piece in a trade CosaoneNYC, just how good he really is then.

One MAJOR difference between Bowden and Kennedy, is his FB is 5-6mph faster and it's easier to hide a mistake at 95mph.

Posted by: johns | May 29, 2009 at 09:02 PM
_____________
Um i've seen Bowden pitch around 3 times i think and never seen a 95 mph from him. He has always been in the 88-92. Sitting 90-91. Unless your thinking about Buchholz who has that velocity? Bowdens standout pitches were his curve and change not a mid 90s fastball

Let's go with Hanson, Morton, Parr, Vasquez and KJ for Peavy and Adrian Gonzalez.

Dude, the Braves don't need starting pitching, not to mention they are not going to include Hanson in any deal. Also, the Padres are not interested in moving Gonzalez at this time.

"Um i've seen Bowden pitch around 3 times i think and never seen a 95 mph from him. He has always been in the 88-92. Sitting 90-91. Unless your thinking about Buchholz who has that velocity? Bowdens standout pitches were his curve and change not a mid 90s fastball"

Bowden tops out at 95mph, his FB sits in the 92-93mph range normally and yeah.. I have also seen Bowden pitch, albeit on MILB TV and at ST games and both his MLB games.

I forgot CosaoneNYC, Bowden's FB has a natural sink movement to it also and makes it difficult to hit.

Let's nip this lack of velocity myth in the bud. Bowden typically works in the 89-93 range (with downward sinking movement) topping out at 95. While he's not a high-end velocity guy, he has a deceptive delivery and 2 strong off-speed pitches (and is working on adding a slider to his arsenal this season). He's not a junkballer or just a command guy.

Yes, Michael Bowden is not in the Tommy Hanson class of elite-and-ready-to-contribute-now pitching prospects but his floor is every bit as high. As a GM, you want a deal that's not going to blow up in your face and Bowden is a safe return. (...and I agree with the general consensus in this thread that Bowden is not equal value to Matt LaPorta. The guy who wrote the article proposing it had the right idea in theory about team needs and depth but he neglected to factor in value into the hypothetical trade.)

"but his floor is every bit as high"


i assume you mean ceiling

no I'm sure he meant floor. The ceiling on guys like Hanson and Bumgarner is higher, but it Bowden is at least as safe of a bet as those guys.

Many Red Sox fans would prefer to see both Bowden and Bucholz finally get a chance to perform in extended MLB duty, but they just keep getting stuck at AAA until they can move someone else above them, or several go down with injuries at the same time and we have these interesting debates.

On a further note:

Touch of class on Schmidt's part by MLB baseball when he did get into the All Star game, but a shame he didn't get to play. I remember in '83 when both Yaz and Bench retired the same season and they both were named to the team and at least they both were allowed to make PH appearances.

"Um i've seen Bowden pitch around 3 times i think and never seen a 95 mph from him. He has always been in the 88-92. Sitting 90-91. Unless your thinking about Buchholz who has that velocity? Bowdens standout pitches were his curve and change not a mid 90s fastball"

Bowden tops out at 95mph, his FB sits in the 92-93mph range normally and yeah.. I have also seen Bowden pitch, albeit on MILB TV and at ST games and both his MLB games.

Posted by: johns | May 29, 2009 at 11:24 PM
----------
Again im not trying to downplay Bowdens talent here, i think he could be a good pitcher and valuable asset to a team. Maybe we are just arguing sementics and velocity certainly isnt the end all be all of a pitcher but im skeptical of him having the fastball you guys are mentioning. Here what John Sickles said about Bowden last year-" Bowden is 6-3, 215 pounds, a right-handed hitter and thrower, born September 9th, 1986. His fastball has average velocity at 88-92 MPH. It doens't sink like Masterson's, but Bowden commands it well. His curveball and changeup are both very good, and his command and control are generally very strong. He is more of a fly ball pitcher than Masterson but hasn't been overly vulnerable to the home run yet. Although his mechanics are a bit unconventional, he's had no major injury problems and appears to be very durable. He is a good athlete." Granted this was last year. Either way hes a prospect id like in my organization but hes not as valuable as Laporta in my opinion.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment


Top Stories



Search MLBTR

Lijit Search

MLBTR Features



Recent Posts


MLBTR Mailing List

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Rumors By Team



Monthly Archives


Live Chats


Tuesdays at 2 p.m. CST



Site Map     Contact     About     Advertise     Privacy Policy     Widget     Twitter     Rss Feed


MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com.