![]() |
|
|
| |
« An Upside To The Manny Suspension? | Main | Yankees DFA Steven Jackson »
6:14pm: MASN's Roch Kubatko has more from Orioles president of basball operations Andy MacPhail. Apparently the trade took about four days to complete.
"We know the tool he has," MacPhail said of the newly acquired Gathright. "He's 28 years old and he's got great speed. A career .260 hitter without much power. I think people have a pretty good understanding. But he really creates more of an inventory for us at a position that is still somewhat up in the air."
4:44pm: According to Bruce Miles of the Daily Herald the Orioles will pay the difference between the two players' salaries. Basically the teams are paying the same amount as they would have had they not made the deal.
4:22pm: Paul Sullivan of the Chicago Tribune reports that the Orioles will continue to pay part of the $3.3MM Freel will make before the end of the season.
3:38pm: The Orioles have traded Freel to the Cubs for Gathright, according to Dan Connolly of the Baltimore Sun. Gathright has already cleared waivers and will be assigned to Triple-A Norfolk.
12:54pm: Ken Rosenthal of FOX Sports reports that the Cubs are talking to the Orioles about a trade for Ryan Freel. As Rosenthal points out, the Cubs have more oufield depth than expected, thanks to Micah Hoffpauir and Kosuke Fukudome. Joey Gathright, who has batted only 14 times this year, is expendable. The Orioles are talking to other clubs about Freel, who has about $3.3MM remaining on this year's contract.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
Please please please say that this could be the end of the Aaron Miles era!!
I know he's signed through next year, but he's a crap player that was always a crap player and he'll continue to be a crap player.
Not to mention that Chicago's current fifth outfielder, Joey Gathright, has given Chicago little reason to believe that he actually belongs in the majors.
Freel would give them a DeRosa-lite: a versatile guy that can man nearly every position on the field while consistently getting on base. The only difference is that Freel offers more speed and defense, while DeRosa offered more patience and power.
I'd really like the Freel addition for the Cubbies.
Then again, if this means dealing Micah Hoffpaiur to land him, then NO!!!! Hoffpaiur is our good bench bat, and with Bradley in the lineup and Lee sucking nuts, I'd like to keep Micah around.
Posted by: scribbletone | May 08, 2009 at 12:57 PM
Freel for Gathright works for me.
Give them Lee, too - I want Hoffpauir in there every day!
Posted by: www.homehalfway.net | May 08, 2009 at 01:02 PM
I'm sorry, but the O's are not going to be trading him for Gathright. We have enough OF as it is with Pie, Montanez, Reimold in AAA knocking on the door, and Luke scott can also still play OF. If anything this may be a salary dump in my opinion.
Also, what if they gave freel for the PTBNL from rich hill?
I'd assume this doesnt happen though.
Posted by: PeterScamgelos | May 08, 2009 at 01:22 PM
Freel for Gathright would be an awesome move for the Cubs. This would be a good way for Hendry to start redeeming himself.
Posted by: CubCrazy | May 08, 2009 at 01:23 PM
Per RotoTimes this morning
Joey Gathright, CF, Chicago Cubs Friday 5/8, 9:23 AM CT
Joey Gathright is expected to be sent down to Triple-A Iowa to make room for pitcher Randy Wells on the roster, according to the Chicago Sun-Times.
Our View: Gathright is only hitting 3-for-14 (all singles) over limited action in the Cubs' crowded outfield, and he is viewed as the most expendable. He has one stolen base, but was caught twice.
Posted by: SuzysMan | May 08, 2009 at 01:56 PM
I think he'd be great fit for the phils. They need a righthanded bat of the bench and a backup cf
Posted by: pb | May 08, 2009 at 02:03 PM
Wish we would have just kept DeRosa :(
But I guess I am in the minority because I don’t trust Freel. Speed guys don’t generally age well post 30, and he hasn’t really shown much the last three seasons. Granted, injuries don’t help, but he seems to have nearly completely lost what little power he once had, and his SB rate has gone down the tube (21 of 35, 60% from 2007-08). At his best he was a slightly below average hitter with speed and versatility – but we most likely wouldn’t be getting his best. We would be getting the lack of power, questionable speed guy with versatility that Baltimore is looking to deal.
Posted by: SuzysMan | May 08, 2009 at 02:05 PM
*sorry, that should have been addressed to Scribbletone and this comment:
"Freel would give them a DeRosa-lite"
Posted by: SuzysMan | May 08, 2009 at 02:06 PM
Can we just trade back for DeRosa? :)
Posted by: www.homehalfway.net | May 08, 2009 at 02:13 PM
Ok, if this is true:
Freel gained some notoriety in August of 2006 when The Dayton Daily News reported that Freel talks to an imaginary voice in his head named Farney.[2] Said Freel: "He's a little guy who lives in my head who talks to me and I talk to him. That little midget in my head said, 'That was a great catch, Ryan,' I said, 'Hey, Farney, I don't know if that was you who really caught that ball, but that was pretty good if it was.' Everybody thinks I talk to myself, so I tell 'em I'm talking to Farney."[3] Freel later said that Farney's name arose from a conversation with Reds trainer Mark Mann: "He actually made a comment like, 'How are the voices in your head?' We'd play around and finally this year he said, 'What's the guy's name?' I said, 'Let's call him Farney.' So now everybody's like, 'Run, Farney, run' or 'Let Farney hit today. You're not hitting very well.'"[4]
Then I really, really, really hope we dont get him. The midget in his head and chip on his shoulder if he isnt playing enough/fitting in enough added to a clubhouse containing Bradley, Zambrano and Pinellia. Well, it might be a recipe for a psychotic-break killing spree.
Posted by: SuzysMan | May 08, 2009 at 02:39 PM
Freel has about asmuch value as mils right now so seems a little much for the cubs. Giving freel to the cubs in exchange for that player to be named or cash for hill seems great to me. We'd have to eat a ton of money but we are eating it now so getting some value would be nice.
Posted by: joemorgan=#1 | May 08, 2009 at 02:54 PM
Gathright for Freel, get it done Hendry this would great fit for Cubs. Freel plays all over and Gthright well the only time he gets on base is when hes pinch running. As for DeRosa hes gone get over it , Hendry gave him away for nothing one of the many horrible trades Hendry has ever made, not to mention Nolasco, Mitre, and Renyal Pinto for Juan F------ Pierre.
Posted by: bcaine | May 08, 2009 at 02:59 PM
It's done.
http://www.baltimoresun.com/sports/baseball/bal-ostrade508,0,687630.story
Posted by: Shane | May 08, 2009 at 03:35 PM
I am sure the Cubs took on the whole Freel salary to get this done. Nice deal.
Posted by: Sportsontap | May 08, 2009 at 03:52 PM
Well, it didn’t cost us anything at all, but still not sure it is going to make much difference. I like Gathright more as a pinch runner, and probably in the OF for that one or so inning that Milton likes to take off to close the game. I like neither at the plate, but Gathright wasn’t getting ABs so ideally Freel experiences the same.
“Please please please say that this could be the end of the Aaron Miles era!!”
And I cant imagine this means we eat the Mills contract. Such a move would do nothing more then prove the FO has no clue what they are doing. This is how I would see it
Trade DeRosa for nothing because of his salary (5.5) Sign Miles and Gathright for a higher combined salary (4.9 and .8 respectively, 5.7 combined) Release Miles eating that amount, and trade Gathright for Freel (4 Mil, or +3.2 over Gathright) who is less talented then the guy we originally shipped off to save money
My math shows (-) 5.5 + 4.9 + 3.2 = + 2.6. So if we release Miles, it will have cost us 2.6 Million in our attempt to ‘save money’ by replacing DeRosa and ending up with Freel.
Posted by: SuzysMan | May 08, 2009 at 03:58 PM
"...DeRosa offered more patience..."
Career Walks per 500 AB
Freel:57 > DeRosa:48
Posted by: Braves-NL-Champs-2010 | May 08, 2009 at 04:07 PM
I honestly think the Cubs traded DeRosa to make room for Fontenot, and to deal the 3 pitchers we got to the Padres for Peavy. That didn't happen, so Hendry looks like a fool.
Hindsight's always 20/20. Fontenot and DeRosa are both going to have solid years, our infield is a little better defensively, and I'd rather see Freel replace Ramirez on days off than Miles.
Ideally, it would have been nice to have Huff instead, but this was a good trade.
Posted by: www.homehalfway.net | May 08, 2009 at 04:12 PM
"...DeRosa offered more patience..."
“Career Walks per 500 AB
Freel:57 > DeRosa:48”
Not true either though, and they are actually, basically about the same for their careers
Freel sits with a career 10.2 BB%, 17.3 K% and 0.65 BB/K rate, seeing and average of 3.95 pitches per PA. DeRosa is 9.1 BB%, 15.0 K% and 0.67 BB/K rate with a 3.95 P/PA.
The big difference comes in that Freel’s patience numbers were generally put up between 2004 and 2006, where DeRosa sees his best marks in 07 and 08.
So where their career numbers are technically about the same, Freel is a “once was” to DeRosa being a “is today”.
Posted by: SuzysMan | May 08, 2009 at 04:18 PM
Considering how many disappointing players the Cubs have dealt to Baltimore the last few months, maybe the headline should just read:
"Cubs outright Joey Gathright to Baltimore."
Posted by: Sour Bob | May 08, 2009 at 04:22 PM
"Considering how many disappointing players the Cubs have dealt to Baltimore the last few months"
More like last couple of years... and it's not really a one way street. Have either of them actually gotten a good deal out of all these trades?
Still Patterson, Pie, Gathright. What's with the Orioles and overhyped young center fielders?
Posted by: start_wearing_purple | May 08, 2009 at 04:39 PM
I like it, Sour Bob. Having fun with Hill and Pie, guys?
Posted by: www.homehalfway.net | May 08, 2009 at 04:39 PM
Felix Pie's BABIP needs to be noted. If the O's cut Pie for Gathright, this won't be a good move.
I don't really like this deal for the Orioles, although it does clear up roster space (Gathright goes to AAA) to call up anyone of value. Better than DFAing Freel, I suppose.
Posted by: melonis rex | May 08, 2009 at 04:55 PM
Wow -- so the Cubs deal Gathright for Freel AND they only have to pay him the minimum. Great deal.
Posted by: CubbyFan23 | May 08, 2009 at 04:55 PM
(or whatever Gathright was being paid, I think it was right over the minimum)
Posted by: CubbyFan23 | May 08, 2009 at 04:55 PM
“Having fun with Hill”
Hill has a mere (for him) 6 walks in 10 IP. That’s only a 5.4 BB/9! Sure, might not seem like much to the average fan - but its infinitely better then the 8.3 he carried in 08.
Can 06-07 really be that big of a fluke? But looking at his 08-09 marks and comparing them to his 02-05 lines, you can see where 06-07 look like the real abnormality
“4:44pm: According to Bruce Miles of the Daily Herald the Orioles will pay the difference between the two players' salaries. Basically the teams are paying the same amount as they would have had they not made the deal.”
Well that is good to hear. And that being the case, releasing Miles would mean an eventual equal dollar cost going from DeRosa to Freel. Not good, but not nearly as bas as paying 2.6 for it. Because of it, add me to the
"Please please please say that this could be the end of the Aaron Miles era!!" group.
"or whatever Gathright was being paid"
yeah, 800K
Posted by: SuzysMan | May 08, 2009 at 05:00 PM
This deal does nothing for me. This team needs bullpen help more then anything else. Right now Marmol is going to be completely dead by August, and another first round exit will follow soon after. Really losing faith in Hendry. He needs to push himself away from the buffet and make a deal that actually will help this team. Freel is overrated.
Posted by: Wrigley Stan | May 08, 2009 at 05:09 PM
Gathright was the odd many out in an over crowded outfield and the only reason Hendry ever picked him up was insurance in case Fukudome didn't come around and/or Bradley went down with injury. Getting Freel for the same money is a no brainer, Anything you get out of him is bonus and I'd much rather see him playing 3rd when ARAM needs a break. Maby Miles can be moved for a reliever? Regardless this was a good move by Hendry..... it still doesn't make up for trading DeRosa, but at least now the Cubs have a more versatile infield.
Posted by: gcheezpuff | May 08, 2009 at 06:11 PM
A lot of strange comments in this thread.
"Then again, if this means dealing Micah Hoffpaiur to land him, then NO!!!! Hoffpaiur is our good bench bat, and with Bradley in the lineup and Lee sucking nuts, I'd like to keep Micah around."
You didn't honestly think that was a possibility did you? Hoffpaiur is not superstar but trades like that lead to GM's being out of work.
"I'm sorry, but the O's are not going to be trading him for Gathright."
Predicting the future is hard, I generally try to not make bold statements about things I can't possibly know.
"Give them Lee, too - I want Hoffpauir in there every day!"
Let's revisit this in August. Given Lee's history I can't see how it would be wise to dump him for no return, he's coming around with the bat and you can't give up on a player like him after one month. At least good GM's don't do things like that.
"Trade DeRosa for nothing because of his salary (5.5) Sign Miles and Gathright for a higher combined salary (4.9 and .8 respectively, 5.7 combined)"
Miles is signed for two years, not one. So no, Hendry didn't end up spending more money in an attempt to replace a player he traded in order to save money. He's smarter than that.
"I am sure the Cubs took on the whole Freel salary to get this done. Nice deal."
That was my first thought too but in hindsight I could see this deal not being done from the Cubs point of view if Baltimore didn't kick in at least some money. They ended up paying the difference which is a minor coup for Hendry, relatively speaking. We're basically getting Freel for at Gathright's price point. It's a small but welcome bonus.
Posted by: pageian | May 08, 2009 at 06:17 PM
Kind of useless fothe orioles. Freel probably has more value then gathright now and paying all that contract sucks. I was hoping we could drop at least a mill on the cubs.
Posted by: joemorgan=#1 | May 08, 2009 at 07:17 PM
“Miles is signed for two years, not one. So no, Hendry didn't end up spending more money in an attempt to replace a player he traded in order to save money. He's smarter than that.”
Your reply is taking a small section of my post and responding to it out of context. It was said as if Miles was released, as was suggested by the comment I was replying to. As if we were giving Miles his 4.9 to just go away. At that point it would pretty much be a salary wash (well, +200K) to go from DeRosa to eventually ending with Freel. If Miles is cut (as was the contingent) then he obviously isn’t that smart because he would have done just that.
Posted by: SuzysMan | May 08, 2009 at 07:19 PM
Hope Freel can play a good Third - he will probably be there a lot now.
Damn, I hope Aramis isnt hurt too bad.
Posted by: SuzysMan | May 08, 2009 at 08:04 PM
Well looks like this trade might be a good one now. That did not look good for Aramis. I'm talking like something torn out for the year didn't look good. Why do my October visions now have Jay Cutler throwing TD's instead of the Cubs playing?
Posted by: gocubsgo | May 08, 2009 at 08:06 PM
"“Miles is signed for two years, not one. So no, Hendry didn't end up spending more money in an attempt to replace a player he traded in order to save money. He's smarter than that.”"
One year of DeRosa is still worth more than two years of Miles.
And two years of Miles is NOT worth 5MM. He's a replacement level player. There are plenty of AAA/AAAA guys who can do what Miles does for league minimum.
Posted by: melonis rex | May 08, 2009 at 08:25 PM
And I am perfectly aware of your point and the context it was in. I just wanted to make that clear.
Posted by: melonis rex | May 08, 2009 at 08:26 PM
"Hope Freel can play a good Third - he will probably be there a lot now.
Damn, I hope Aramis isnt hurt too bad."
If Aramis is hurt long term, then I could see a trade for Beltre in the works. Although, assuming Beltre rebounds in offensive production level, that will cost a pretty penny.
Posted by: melonis rex | May 08, 2009 at 08:33 PM
Melonis,
You could see a trade for Beltre, but will Seattle actually trade him and if they do, do they Cubs have the goods to get him?
Right now they are playing well and I'm not sure what the Mariners would want in return, but I know the Cubs farm system isn't very strong
Posted by: gocubsgo | May 08, 2009 at 08:35 PM
Dislocated shoulder for Aramis. Those are tough, depending on the severity, it can require surgery so I guess we will just have to wait and see. The biggest problem is even when he comes back, the slightest thing can dislocate it again,
Posted by: gocubsgo | May 08, 2009 at 08:46 PM
Bye, Joey. Jump on over to Baltimore's organization.
Beltre deal? Let's not get overboard. Even if Ram's shoulder puts him out long, I just don't see that kind of move...even if the Cubs could swing it.
Posted by: studio179 | May 08, 2009 at 08:48 PM
“Dislocated shoulder for Aramis. Those are tough, depending on the severity, it can require surgery so I guess we will just have to wait and see. The biggest problem is even when he comes back, the slightest thing can dislocate it again,”
Gah, worse then I wanted to hear. What are they saying, 2-3 months?
“If Aramis is hurt long term, then I could see a trade for Beltre in the works. Although, assuming Beltre rebounds in offensive production level, that will cost a pretty penny.”
That is a good chunk of change (remember, Seattle hasn’t seemed to be willing to include much, if any, salary when trading pieces off as of late) and we don’t have a ton of prospects to work with. If they want much, it wont happen. Plus, if it’s a deadline deal, Ramirez will be coming back sometime not too long after ideally, and Beltre would be wasted. If this injury happened closer to the break, I would agree they would probably work it out. Now though? Doubtful.
Posted by: SuzysMan | May 08, 2009 at 09:00 PM
One last thing, W.T.H. was Milton arguing again! Get off the field you buffoon! We all know you want to argue each and every call that doesn’t go your way, that doesn’t mean you should! We already lost one big bat today, you looking to get your second suspension in about a 3 week span to ensure we loose another? Sit down and shut up!
(Yes, I know he was fairly calm about it, but he is a ticking time bomb and putting himself into the situation at all is dangerous ground.)
Posted by: SuzysMan | May 08, 2009 at 09:05 PM
SuzysMan,
They haven't given a time frame. They have to see how severe it is. I'm not a DR, but I would guess best case scenario is he misses a month or so, worst case would be surgery and he's out for the year. My logical guess would be Aramis possibly somewhere in the middle, but I'm just guessing here. I would think he would be gone at least for a couple weeks to a month minimum. Like I said the worst part may be that it's one of those injuries that can definitely bother you the whole year and easily could get dislocated again, just from swinging.
Posted by: gocubsgo | May 08, 2009 at 09:05 PM
Well tonight was just a reminder. We can guess and debate all night about how long Ramirez might be out or who they might try to trade for, but if Hendry doesn't get some major help for this bullpen, this team isn't going anywhere this year.
Posted by: gocubsgo | May 08, 2009 at 09:32 PM
So Ryan Freel is the first to go in what will hopefully become a contract year fire sale for the orioles.
next up? danys baez. after him? jamie walker. then, aubrey huff. maybe even luke scott even though hes not in a contract year.
Posted by: lftyg33 | May 08, 2009 at 10:53 PM
I'm an orthopedic surgeon, and after watching the game I would say aramis would lean more towards 3-4 months if he wants to play (5-6 months if he wants this completely healed). It all depends how much torsion there was on the shoulder, which didn't look like a lot. Bottom line is this is an unfortunate thing for a-ram and it will take him some time to come back to full strength. The thing about dislocations is that you can always play on them...it usually doesn't hurt that much. If this were the AL he'd be fine just on a hitting basis. But on the field this is a real problem.
If the cubs are in it come july, I think they should really focus on pitching. If all the usual suspects are available...bedard, halladay etc.....they should really consider dumping vitters. Aramis will be fine for the playoffs if they get there.
Posted by: msk86 | May 09, 2009 at 12:26 AM
"One last thing, W.T.H. was Milton arguing again! Get off the field you buffoon! We all know you want to argue each and every call that doesn’t go your way, that doesn’t mean you should! We already lost one big bat today, you looking to get your second suspension in about a 3 week span to ensure we loose another? Sit down and shut up!"
Just an observation from one Cub fan to another here. Don't let Milton put you in the hospital ;) I understand he can act like a child. I also understand we need his bat to heat up. Especially now that Aramis is down. Everyone is entitled to their opionion. I here 'ya! I'm a regular here. We can put up with his ups and downs I guess. We put up with Sammy's self entitlement for years. I am nervous a bit too. He can't handle April and May. What will he be like in August and September...yikes! Hang in there! ;)
Posted by: studio179 | May 09, 2009 at 01:17 AM
Yeah, I know. It’s just nuts. It’s barely a month into the season and I’m already on pins and needles every time I see him/hear his name fearing he will punch an ump, strangle a reporter or lose a limb trying to jump into the stands to take out a fan. Why? Because he has already shown us he is capable of any of those things :/ I mean, maybe it’s the flu, but I myself just about snapped watching that fool up there arguing (again) roughly two weeks after getting his suspension (and meeting with Lou) and only minutes after Ramirez goes down! And what was up with him holding the ball above his head as if he was delivering the Olympic torch after that hap hazard, fall all over himself and somehow get lucky enough to have it end up in his hand play? Does he expect an award for freaking getting lucky on a play he should have probably made cleanly?
God I want Dunn :(
Posted by: SuzysMan | May 09, 2009 at 11:12 AM
The ARam loss is tough hopefully they can get him back before the allstar game. There is no replacemnent that would come close to his production. However there are options.
1. Ryan Freel- Good pickup for basically a garbage player.
2. Adrian Beltre- Probably wont have to give up much to acquire him as a rent a player.
3. Start working Vitters up thru the minors.
4. Bobby Scales Career minor leaguer, but was hitting in AAA.
My other thought is kind of a reach, history has shown some infielders can switch corners, use Haufpauir it is far fetched as he throws lefty.
Posted by: ryno23 | May 09, 2009 at 11:46 AM
“history has shown some infielders can switch corners, use Haufpauir”
Only works going the other direction (third to first). Hoff hasn’t played a day of third in his pro career – that wont work.
Beltre will cost a bunch, and not just in prospects – money too. Otherwise Seattle wouldn’t trade him, and just try to resign him over the off season when there will likely be few bidders looking for a 3B (most teams have the position locked up)
Vitters is at least 2 years away, and he still isnt producing that great versus single A pitching. He would be destroyed in the majors.
Scales can fill the roster spot and be used every now and then, but if he is starting most of the games for us, we are screwed.
Now, the news on Ramirez seems to be all over the place. I have heard as little as 4-6 weeks, but then heard as much as 3 months. Eric Young said he experienced the same thing and was out for 2 months, but couldn’t do anything for about 3. MLB Network had someone say something similar. It seems like we are realistically looking at Auguest as a return to form date. That is after the break, but the deadline would have just past and most solid guys at 3rd wouldn’t be traded before then. If we don’t pull in a scrapheap stop-gap, it probably is Second and Third platoon of Fontenot, Miles and Freel (with possibly a taste of Scales).
Posted by: SuzysMan | May 09, 2009 at 12:06 PM
Heading into the season, it was clear that when Koskie retired, no back up to 3B. I was all for getting Fonteno ABs. In doing so, that put DeRosa on the bench (too costly for that) or trade bait, since they wanted a lefty in RF.
It's already looking like they should have kept DeRosa, forget about Bradley and let Mark play RF. He would have moved over to third (his best position IMHO) and we would have our back up to Ram. I hope Hendry's plan does not bite the team the way it did when he had no true back up for Lee in '06 and took too long to get someone in there after the injury. Kind of missing Dee-Ro now. What's that saying...'hindsight is 20/20'.
Posted by: studio179 | May 09, 2009 at 01:42 PM
How about Lee for Beltre and make Hoffpaiur the every day 1B?
Posted by: Svengoolie | May 09, 2009 at 02:24 PM
The A-Ram injury sucks. I really love this guy as a player. He is another one of those guys, like Jason Bay, and Carlos Beltran, that despite playing in a big market on a very good team, tends to go unnoticed despite the fact that he produces like a superstar every year. He can just rake, and watching from afar, it seems like he really worked to be where he is. He always could hit, but has worked very hard on his defense to the point where at one point he was a liability, and now he is a very solid third baseman. He also improved his BB rate last year, really the only semi flaw he had left. This guy is one of the great players in this league, that nobody ever talks about. Hope he gets back sooner rather then later.
Posted by: nrmax88 | May 09, 2009 at 05:33 PM
Don't think the M's would care for Lee. If they end up looking to move Adrian, it will be because they fell out of the race, so they will look for younger guys with little to no service time that they can control cheaply, not another guy they will have to pay a lot of money to and re-flip for prospects in a year or so.
Posted by: nrmax88 | May 09, 2009 at 05:39 PM
Bruce Levine just posted this on his blog at 5:32 pm today... I would post the link, but I'm new to this site and don't know if my post may be deleted so I'm paraphrasing, but this is pretty much the jist of it.
Ramirez will gone for a minimum of 6-8 weeks. He is getting a CT scan to see if there are any fractures where it dislocated, and he will probably go to James Andrews as well.. If there is a fracture detected, surgery will be required and he will be lost 6 months, so basically the year and playoffs, assuming the cubs make it
Posted by: gocubsgo | May 09, 2009 at 05:51 PM
gcg, if you have a link to something important, then I don't think anybody would have any issue with you posting it. I mean, the whole idea of this blog is that Tim links different stories all around the country, even the world. I think people would only take issue with links if they are links to a persons blog or website, and they are just trying to spam MLBTR to get hits.
Posted by: nrmax88 | May 09, 2009 at 05:57 PM
gcg, if you have a link to something important, then I don't think anybody would have any issue with you posting it. I mean, the whole idea of this blog is that Tim links different stories all around the country, even the world. I think people would only take issue with links if they are links to a persons blog or website, and they are just trying to spam MLBTR to get hits.
Posted by: nrmax88 | May 09, 2009 at 05:57 PM
NrMax,
Here is the link to the Ramirez report. It's Bruce Levine's blog. It also has White Sox stuff too so scroll down and the entry at 5:32 pm today is where he gives the Ramirez injury timeframe.
http://espn.go.com/chicago/columns/blog?name=levine
The Cubs said 4-6 on their broadcast, and personally I think that's REALLY optimistic. If he is back before the All-star break, I would be shocked.
Posted by: gocubsgo | May 09, 2009 at 06:41 PM
“The Cubs said 4-6 on their broadcast, and personally I think that's REALLY optimistic. If he is back before the All-star break, I would be shocked.”
Yeah, like I mentioned, I keep hearing 2 months and 3 to get the strength back to normal from people that have gone through it. 6-8 seems much more realistic then 4-6, and even it sounds like it might be a little low. The length if surgery is needed though is frightening :/
Posted by: SuzysMan | May 09, 2009 at 09:43 PM
I do not believe the talk on the broadcast of Ramirez being only out a month either. For now, looks like the little, scrappy guys they have will have to fill in at 3B. That is a concern, but the pen is a big concern.
Speaking of the pen, I have to say I was wrong in a post a couple days ago.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now we have Chad Fox, who is good for about 3+ innings before his arm falls off again.
Posted by: studio179 | May 07, 2009 at 02:11 PM
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I stand corrected. He did not make it to 3+ innings and his arm did fall off. This pen situation of walks and not getting the job done more times than not flat out worries me.
Someone needs to get called up and throw strikes.
Posted by: studio179 | May 10, 2009 at 12:14 AM
"I stand corrected. He did not make it to 3+ innings and his arm did fall off."
Thank you for bringing a smile to my face. I mean, not that I am laughing at his bad fortune, or enjoy the fact we lost him as well. But that was damn funny.
Posted by: SuzysMan | May 10, 2009 at 12:24 AM
I didn't wanna see Ryan Freel return to the NL Central unless it was with my Reds. He has such a great heart and he was invaluable in Cincinnati. It's just a shame to see him traded to such a terrible city.
Posted by: Tony B | May 11, 2009 at 12:08 PM
WISHING THE OS HAD GOT SEAN MARSHALL INSTEAD!
Posted by: hambone | May 26, 2009 at 07:55 PM