![]() |
|
|
| |
« Rangers Release Orlando Hernandez | Main | Halladay Could Demand A Trade After The Season If Traded »
Here's some links to check out as you celebrate the return of a full slate of baseball games...
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
I cant believe anyone would call the Bucco's cheap!
Posted by: We Traded Ramirez For What? | July 17, 2009 at 06:00 PM
It all adds up. The Pirates are trying to give other teams the impression that they are not forced to move Wilson and/or Sanchez, which is true. They aren't going to trade their most consistent defensive players -and the league's top double-play tandem- for a couple of jabronis that aren't going to be able to step right in and make an impact.
As for Sano, I just don't get it. The kid says he wants to play for the Pittsburgh Pirates. He and his family have a great relationship with Rene Gayo, and his family trusts that Gayo will make sure the kid is in good hands in the Buccos organization. But the kid's agent is pushing for top-dollar, rather than Sano's personal interests. Pathetic.
Posted by: ChampYinz | July 17, 2009 at 06:01 PM
It's not pathetic that Sano's agent is pushing to get the most money. It's his job. Every agent wants their client to get the most money, so they themselves can get more money.
Posted by: jdub | July 17, 2009 at 06:15 PM
jdub, it is not necessarily the agent's job to get the most money. It is there job to deal with the financial side of the game based upon what the client wants. It may be in the agent's best interest to get the most money, but it's not necessarily his job.
Posted by: was385 | July 17, 2009 at 06:22 PM
I have the feeling something might happen after the Giants/Pirates series. You never know!
Posted by: Giantsguy1987 | July 17, 2009 at 06:23 PM
Screw Halladay....
I'd trade Utley for Lince straight up and move Donald to second...
Hell bring back Tad Iguchi for a 3rd stint...
Posted by: allabouthephils | July 17, 2009 at 06:25 PM
His job is to have the best interests of his client and money is only one issue. However it sounds like the Pirates are the top offer and his agent is trying to make the Pirates think their is a higher offer!
I hope Jack Wilson retires a Pirate and sees winning baseball in Pittsburgh. Jack is a class act and the best defensive player at his position. He hits enough for a SS! Freddy signed would be nice but his trade value makes it hard to extend.
Posted by: We Traded Ramirez For What? | July 17, 2009 at 06:25 PM
Yeah, but if you're not amicable to clients, clients won't hire you. So you are pretty much dealing with your client's best interests if you're an agent.
Look at Michael Ynoa last year, since there was similar posturization over him as well. The A's weren't the highest bidder (I think Yankees or Rangers was offering slightly higher), but Ynoa signed with the A's due to how well they develop pitchers or something along the lines.
Sano will have the final say, same way Ynoa did last year
Posted by: melonis rex | July 17, 2009 at 06:51 PM
My guess is after Huntington shopped them around, he saw that teams are undervaluing them.
This means two things.
1. Prospects received in trade are not going to significantly upgrade the Pirates' organization.
2. The Pirates can offer them less money than they might have originally thought.
That's a lot different than low-balling them.
Posted by: MarkInDallas | July 17, 2009 at 06:51 PM
"I'd trade Utley for Lince straight up"
This is a joke right?
Why would the Giants ever trade Lincecum for Utley? There is only one player that I would trade TL straight up for, and his name is Albert.
Lincecum will be one of the greatest pitchers of all time.
Posted by: JT | July 17, 2009 at 07:01 PM
They (the Rats) have very little in the way of middle infield depth while the OF, 3B and C positions will all be filled with kids coming into their own over the next couple years. Locking down what they have up the middle means they wont have black holes in place incase, like this year, they play better then expected. (yes, this year - their Pythagorean is 43-45, which would put them in the race). Lock down the middle infield, have the kids elseware with a 1B like Nick Johnson added as well as a couple pitchers. Team could surprise people next season, and I like the move. (well, I would if I wasnt a Cub fan - I like it when I take my fandom hat off)
Posted by: SuzysMan | July 17, 2009 at 07:01 PM
"This is a joke right?
Why would the Giants ever trade Lincecum for Utley? There is only one player that I would trade TL straight up for, and his name is Albert.
Lincecum will be one of the greatest pitchers of all time.
Posted by: JT | July 17, 2009 at 07:01"
Wow..
If you havent noticed Utley is well on his way to becoming one of the greatest 2nd baseman of all time.
Posted by: 661dodgerblue | July 17, 2009 at 07:06 PM
@melonis: while i agree with you that its not a done deal with Sano and maybe Pirates will win out. i think in a case like this the agent has too much power. I mean its a 16 year kid (hopefully) who isn't gonna understand the nuances of baseball negotiation. Sure ideally he'd replace his agent if the agents was steering him wrong but he might not know that he has that option.
Posted by: Steveo26 | July 17, 2009 at 07:10 PM
"Wow..
If you havent noticed Utley is well on his way to becoming one of the greatest 2nd baseman of all time."
And?
I would take an all-time elite type pitcher over an all-time elite type second baseman any day. The only way I would trade that c
kind of pitching is for a game-changing hitter like Bonds, Pujols, ARod in his prime, etc. Utley, while a great player, is not game-changing.
Posted by: JT | July 17, 2009 at 07:23 PM
"Utley, while a great player, is not game-changing."
Posted by: JT | July 17, 2009 at 07:23 PM
i'm not entirely sure i agree with that. i'm not a phillies fan, but mr. utley is something special.
his defense alone is game-changing.
Posted by: part-time pariah | July 17, 2009 at 07:35 PM
Yeah I worded that wrong, what I meant was that it is in the agents best interest to get the most money. But as melonis rex said, Sano has the final say.
Posted by: jdub | July 17, 2009 at 07:37 PM
Don't get me wrong...
I think Utley is a great player, and I like the guy but right now, as I see it, there are only 2 truly game-changing players: Albert Pujols and Manny Ramirez. I'm talking about guys that change the opposing teams entire approach to the game. How they get pitched too, how the rest of the team see's pitches as a result, etc. Guys that you think are going to hit the ball out of the yard every single time they swing the bat.
Those are the only types of player that I would trade a pitcher like Lincecum for (obviously not Manny b/c of his age).
Guys like Utley, Longoria, Hanley, Ichiro, Kemp, Wright are all great players, however their value is not as great as an elite pitcher that can go out and essentially win a game on his own 9 times out of every 10 games.
Posted by: JT | July 17, 2009 at 07:51 PM
"I don't think were going to give up half the organization for one player."
It should be "we're".
Also, "series of post" should be plural - "posts".
Finally, "The Blue Jays have signed their fourth round pick according to Bob Elliott of The Toronto Sun." is missing a comma following the word "pick".
Posted by: rememberthecoop | July 17, 2009 at 08:34 PM
JT,
i hear what you're saying, but i still disagree. everyone has a price.
that being said, if i'm in charge in san francisco, i'd sign lincecum for life.
Posted by: part-time pariah | July 17, 2009 at 09:30 PM
trade sano 4 utly
Posted by: Bucco fan 1# | July 17, 2009 at 10:01 PM
"Guys like Utley, Longoria, Hanley, Ichiro, Kemp, Wright are all great players, however their value is not as great as an elite pitcher that can go out and essentially win a game on his own 9 times out of every 10 games.
Posted by: JT | July 17, 2009 at 07:51 PM "
I disagree... in the form of Chase Utley, I think he's won 3 to 4 games in a row for the phillies a few times this year. Halladay is great, but the offense stil has to score behind him AND be solid on defense with no errors
Posted by: whitesoxfan424 | July 17, 2009 at 10:11 PM
Utley has put up WAR's of 8.1, 8, 6.4 & 7.4 in his last 4 years. Tim was 7.5 last year and is on his way to a 8 WAR this year. Do you trust a pitcher (with a violent delivery) to keep it up at 25 more than a 30 year 2b? Its pretty freaking close!
Posted by: tdogg | July 17, 2009 at 11:10 PM
Longoria with that contract has to be the most valuable player in baseball
Posted by: bravesfan22193 | July 18, 2009 at 12:33 AM
Whitesoxfan424-
I agree that it is a team game and that a team has to play well behind a pitcher, however I feel that the pitcher has much more influence on the outcome of the game than a single hitter has.
Theoretically a pitcher can have 27 3 pitch strikeouts and go up and hit a home run at the plate (NL). This would result in a definite win.
However a batter can go up and go 5-5 with 5 home runs and 10 RBI's, play high-light caliber defense, and his team could still conceivably lose the game.
Pitching is just more valuable than hitting.
tdogg-
I'm not a big sabermetric stats guy, and I don't really use the WAR stat because I feel that any and all of these fangraph type statistics are objective. The exact same statistic can be used to prove or disprove an argument by both sides. With that being said I simply watch the players play the game. I've played the game through the minor leagues and I watch it every single day. However if you are into the sabermetric side then more power to ya! As for Lincecums delivery... You seem like a baseball fan so I'm curious if you read the SI article regarding Lincecums delivery, or if you have seen any of the ESPN features on the delivery? You should really check it out if you haven't already done so. Basically, it breaks down his delivery, and shows why it is actually less violent than most other delivery's. Lincecum uses his body and legs more than most pitchers in the game to create a whip like motion, which in turn relieves stress and pressure from his arm. He actually has close to a perfect delivery. His dad (whom is actually a brilliant baseball mind) taught him this delivery young, and taught him the right things to do to take care of his arm. The kid is just flat out amazing.
Posted by: JT | July 18, 2009 at 02:10 PM
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2008/writers/tom_verducci/07/01/lincecum0707/index.html
http://www.baseballthinkfactory.org/files/mechanics/discussion/controlled_fury_tim_lincecum/
Here are two links to articles that break down Lincecums mechanics.
The first is a link to the Sports Illustrated article, and the second is a really cool video breakdown of why his delivery is so good.
Enjoy!
Posted by: JT | July 18, 2009 at 03:21 PM
Wow I should have proof-read my post.
Objective should obviously read "subjective."
Posted by: JT | July 18, 2009 at 05:36 PM
JT,
I'd love to agree with you 100% about Lincecum's delivery. But, I just can not agree with that.
If you remember a few years back, everyone was saying the same things about a couple of young Cubs pitchers... guys named Mark Prior and Kerry Wood. Neither one of them stayed healthy.
Lincecum is a remarkable pitcher, but the mechanics of a pitchers delivery are an inexact science at best.
Posted by: FireGMBillSmith | July 27, 2009 at 06:04 PM