MLB Rumors - MLB Trade Rumors
Subscribe to MLB Trade Rumors using RSS
Home     Contact     About     Advertise     Archives     Widget     Twitter      RSS Usage

« Cubs Likely To Sign John Grabow | Main | Brewers Eyeing Starting Pitchers »

Curtis Granderson Becomes Available

The Tigers are letting teams know center fielder Curtis Granderson is available, according to an NL executive who talked to the New York Post's Joel Sherman.  Sherman believes the Yankees would have interest.

Sherman qualifies the rumor, saying Granderson nor Edwin Jackson are players the Tigers truly want to trade.  Sherman notes that Jackson appeals to both New York teams.    

While we named Granderson in our center fielder trade market post, we didn't think he was really available. One thing I learned writing that post is that Granderson's 2009 batting line was misleading, and he's well worth the $25.75MM owed to him over the next three seasons. The Tigers could restock the cupboards with a Granderson trade.  Pure speculation, but might the Cubs be interested in the Illinois native?  Way back in March of '07, Granderson talked to us about the possibility of playing in Chicago.


Comments

frank wren,

go get him.

So..if true does this mean the Tigers are basically making everyone available?

As a Twins fan I wouldn't be sad to see him leave the divison, I have always liked his game, it seems the Tigers payroll issues are really hurting them and now they have to shop some of their better players.

You'd like to think that, Tim, wouldn't you? Hehe. He'd obviously be a great fit for the Cubbies, but do they realistically have the pieces necessary to acquire him? You also have to try to pawn Bradley off on somebody.

OMG i am so excited so many posts lol could anyone see the Giants going for him ...maybe giving up say Jonathan Sanchez... I hear you guys need pitching help?

OMG i am getting so excited imagine the Giants picking up Uggla, Granderson from trades and then getting Nick Johnson!!! that would be so great please Sabean those players are amazing and e need a leadoff man or should we stick with BURRIS OR VELEZ!!!!!!!

get it done cash

Granderson would cost MORE than Sanchez.

He is a definite lead off hitter. The Rowand contract is like an anvil!!

i wonder what it would take to get granderson. he has an affordable contract for next three yrs.

I changed my mind first of all: He is owed 25.6m over the next 3 years, and he hit like .133 against lefties this year, just came froma 30 hr season, STrikeouts a lot! 141 times last year, and yea... that does not look good for the future but i am guessing if you want to take a risk sure but if you move him to the NL maybe he would do better!??!?!?!

Granderson may be availible as the tigers have an excess of outfielders. He is one of the top 5 CF in the game and he will cost a bounty. I am thinking a number 2 starter and 2 blue chip prospects. Thoughts ?

Not to be biased, but what about the other team in Chicago not wanting to spend $ on Figgins and are reluctant to resign Podsednik? I hear this Granderson guy did pretty good against them too. Coincidently they have an opening in the OF and a need for a lead off hitter.

Only ? is who do they trade

i'd think maybe more than that because of him only being owed 26 mil over 3 yrs.

haha Giants fans have been without a major league offense for so long some fans are getting excited about Nick Johnson, Dan Uggla and Curtis Granderson.

I love it!

white sox would never get him , same division not enough prospects

Granderson is a Sox fan from the south suburbs and belongs on the White Sox. I always thought it was a crime that he played for Detroit. Unfortunately the Tigers would never deal with the White Sox - not to mention the Rios problem.

Send Bradley plus cashand throw in Sam Fuld and Jake Fox to sweaten the pot. Fuld won't have a place once Granderson arrives, and Fox is destined to be a DH. Both are young and cheap and most clubs would jump at chance to have young, cheap, MLB ready players in return (plus the malcontent that is Uncle Milty).

there is no better fit for the cubs, and they thought the tigers had interest in bradley too, can he be included in the package?

milton bradley would single handedly put detroit in a great depression. haha

He is a sox fan, my friend went to college with him at UIC, and he enjoys playing at the cell. However, I really don't think the tigers and sox matchup well, not to mention, as southsider said, tigers wouldn't do it.

he should be a brewer next year

can to cubs get the trade done without including castro, vitters, cashner, or diamond?

Granderson is a great player...he is coming off a career high in HRs but other then that..he had a down year.

no surprise he's on the block...in case you haven't heard...the economy is not so good in Detroit.

He's grew up in Illinois. This might have the white sox all over it because Even if Kenny Williams say there is no money you never know what hes got planned up his sleeve.

I doubt Yankees sign him since they already have Swisher, Melky, and Gardner. Along with Jackson in AAA.

Granderson's contract is extremely affordable. He is making around $8.5MIL per season. Many called last season a down-year for him, but he was still worth $15.2MIL according to fangraphs. I will be disappointed if Curtis is traded, he is many fan's favorite player.

"He's grew up in Illinois."

More specifically, he grew up in Lansing, IL (Chicago south suburbs) and went to Thornton Fractional HS and UIC for college. Like me, he's a southsider through and through.

Fire Dombrowski, quick!
The Dumbo that brought us $ 72 million in BAD contracts, is now shopping all the good contracts to keep the bad ones on the books!
And NO, the Tigers don't want Milton Bradley. Not even for free.
For Granderson?
Dodgers- Matt Kemp, George Sherrill, and James McDonald
Angels- Howie Kendrick, Maicer Izturis, and Jose Arredondo
Giants- Pablo Sandoval and Matt Cain
Cubbies? You don't match up.
Yankees- Hughes, Joba, and Cano
Twinkies- Denard Span, JJ Hardy, and Matt Guerrier
or Joe Mauer (we'll throw in Laird!)
Black Sox- Alexei Ramirez, Matt Thornton, and you have to take Magglio back!

Are the Yankees really interested, or does every NY reporter tack their name onto every rumor just because? Over the past few days, I think I've read that the Yankees are interested in every player in the league.

Fox
Fontenot
Caridad
Bradley
(one of our many right handed pitchers besides samardzia, cashner, diamond)

LOL @ Tigerdog

It's hard to judge what the Tigers would want for Granderson. Even if they trade him and Jackson, you still can't say that they are rebuilding.

San Francisco would make a lot of sense, as they could offer a package of good arms. They'd have to move Rowand to one of the corners of course.

Tigerdog, is that what it would take to land Curtis Granderson or Verlander? Holy cow, Granderson would maybe warrent one of those players from each team but definitely not all off them. I'll take 3 helpings of whatever your smokin!

TD, you're not close on any of those expectations. He'd bring in a nice haul but none as big as those

I know inter-division trading doesnt happen a whole lot, but i expect KW to take a look at this one. Tigers need a catcher right? Maybe Tyler Flowers could be a centerpiece to a deal. I know we wont ever get Granderson from Detroit, but we got Teahen from the Royals so we got one inter-divison trade down already.

Its starting to look like Illich ordered a Fire Sale

@Tigerdog.

oh wow...Sandoval AND Cain?? Shooting for the moon i see.

Hughes, Chamberlain AND Cano?? geez...anyone else? Want Texieira?

"Are the Yankees really interested, or does every NY reporter tack their name onto every rumor just because? Over the past few days, I think I've read that the Yankees are interested in every player in the league."
I think they're required to link Yankees to each player, it automatically sells papers or gives you hits on a website.

Can Granderson hit LHP yet?

Hughes, Joba and Cano? Why don't the Yankees just throw in Rivera (since he is getting old) and A-Rod too?

Pfffssshhh...

I could see the Yankees getting involved if Damon's demands are too much. Granderson fits the bill as young, good defense and a leadoff hitter. Sorry, Jeter to me will always be the #2 hitter.

Granderson for Cano?

Tigerdog, I really hope all those trades you proposed are jokes. Most of the guys mentioned like Kemp, Sandoval, Cain, and Cano are better players than Granderson, and you actually think teams would give them up plus others???

I don't think Granderson is a great player, his skill set is a little strange, but he certainly has very good value and I don't see why Detroit would trade him. They have the potential to ruin their franchise this off-season, they'd be much better off just sticking it out this year because the bad contracts won't disappear if they trade good young players. They just have to endure a potentially rough season, but their flexibility will be so much better next off-season.

Ok, what do you guys think of this proposal for Grandy...

1. Austin jackson
2. Mark Melancon
3. PTBNL
4. PTBNL
5. $8 million in contract relief.

I think the tigers would jump on that. They get a long time replacement for grandy in Jackson, get a bullpen arm they badly need in Melancon and get $8 mil that they can't afford off the book. The two PTBNL won't be signifcant, really just add on's to sweeten an already good deal.

Tigerdog - are you mad? Kemp is MUCH better than Granderson so what makes you think they could get Kemp + from LAD? No way NYY trades Joba, Hughes AND Cano - no way...

Tigerdogs has to be kidding. Cain, Kemp, Sandoval, Span and Cano are all better than Granderson.

With Granderson available - do NYY forget about Damon? I would - Granderson is:
1. Faster
2. Better defensively
3. More power
4. Younger
5. Less expensive

than Damon...it is a no-brainer...

@Mickey Mac

i would think the tigers would want one of the 20 catching prospects the yankees have.

What about Granderson screams leadoff hitter? The low OBP? The 30 HR power? Just being fast isn't (or shouldn't be) enough. He's a 6 masquerading as a leadoff hitter.

That said, I imagine NY would be very interested. Jackson would certainly be in the deal; Detroit getting salary relief and a replacement, Yankees get more certainty out of CF and a guy they know will be ready next year. I guess the rest of the Yankees proposal is what would determine if its feasible or not.

I smell a blockbuster. Granderson and Edwin Jackson in the same trade. Who wouldnt be in on that? I'm just wondering what it would take to get both.

and @Rob G

if i were the yankees i wouldn't forget about Damon...i would now forget about Matsui.

imo with the speed that johnny damon still has..and the power in a tiny ballpark. He is a better option then Matsui is.

granderson for cano is plenty

The Yankees should have to take on the contract of Robertson or Willis if they trade for him.

Mickey Mac's proposal is pretty good, maybe offer Robertson if the Tigers prefer him to Melancon, then take on one of those bad contracts.

I still don't think they should do it because they should wait until the contracts expire, but they would get a very good CF prospect, an arm or two that should succeed, and some MUCH needed salary relief.

I am smelling a bradley for Granderson trade. :)

Sorry had to say it

"i would think the tigers would want one of the 20 catching prospects the yankees have."

Doesn't seem like a fit with Avila already in the majors.

(Not that catching depth hurts, but its not a need.)

Granderson + Jackson
for
Joba, Montero, AJax, and Melancon

Kemp, Cain, Cano, Mauer, and Ramirez are all worth more than Granderson on their own let alone bundled with the others.

johan na they are going to pawn off one of their overpaid pitchers with each trade.

Something like Granderson/Bonderman to the Cubs for whatever. Then Jackson/Willis to the Brewers for whatever else.

Neither trade will bring much back but both might be worth it.

I think Granderson is a legitimate centerfielder and would be a defensive upgrade over the current Melky/Gardner combination for the Yankees. His only drawbacks are his inability to hit left handed pitching, strikeouts and salary. I think offering Cano would be too much.

I really doubt Granderson gets dealt. He's one of the few players on that team worth the money he is owed, no reason they should deal him right now, unless the haul is really good (though the ones TigerDog posted are ludicrous, homer alert!)

Granderson to oakland, 2 offers

1. andrew bailey, jeff gray,eric patterso, and vin mazzaro

2. ryan sweeney, mike wuertz, simmons,and cardenas

Would DeJesus, Callaspo, and a minor league pitcher (say Mellville) be enough/too much?

The Cubs wouldn't give a damn if Granderson hit .000 against lefties. They need someone to hit righties. They have Lee, Rammy, Soriano, and Soto that can hit lefties.

Tigerdog, you are a total buffoon. 90% of teams AT LEAST would take the younger, better Kemp over Granderson. Adding in a potentially good closer and a good prospect? Ok, but the Tigers gotta add Jackson or Porcello and Ni.

As far as the Cubs not matching up, that's pure poppycock. They could offer a decent 2B in Baker or Fontenot, a great defensive SS in Andres Blanco, a pitcher like Marshall or Gorzelanny (both could start or be strong lefty relievers), they could add Fuld as a defensive CF with some upside to replace Granderson, and maybe prospects. Now, not ALL of that, but those are pieces that could be moved.

Bradley serves no purpose to the Tigers, because they have Raburn, Magglio, and Guillen taking the corner OF and DH spots.

If they got Granderson for a package of Marshall/Gorzelanny, Caridad/Stevens/Berg, Fox, and Fontenot/Baker, then it makes a bit of sense to trade Bradley to get Castillo.

In fact, since Castillo is a singles hitter with some speed, he could lead off, then Granderson can smack 'em into the gap to send Castillo 1st to 3rd or to get a quick score early.

Or the Cubs could add in Bradley and offer to take back Magglio or Guillen.

RickJames - but Damon's agent is Boras and he is already hinting at 3-4 yr contract - NYY will run from that. Trade for Granderson and sign MAtsui as FT DH - Matsui is a beast in Yankee Stadium!

Granderson is a Sox fan from the south suburbs and belongs on the White Sox. I always thought it was a crime that he played for Detroit. Unfortunately the Tigers would never deal with the White Sox - not to mention the Rios problem.

Posted by: southsider | November 11, 2009 at 02:00 PM

Ok? It's not going to happen. Saying he belongs with the Sox won't sway Detroit.

As a Cubs fan, why does it seem like every Cub fan thinks Sam Fuld and Mike Fontenot are the keys to a trade. They're throw-ins at best.

That being said, the Cubs should definitely make a play for Granderson. Dave Dombrowski is a good GM and I have to believe he's looking for major league ready players and possibly a prospect for Granderson. The question is what's a guy who hit .250 and makes almost $9 million worth in a trade. I would think a trade centered around Sean Marshall or Jeff Samardzija (if he's willing to waive the NTC) and Jake Fox with a prospect thrown in (for all those thinking Vitters, Cashner, Castro - not going to happen). It would probably be a mid-level prospect.

Perhaps if the Cubs took Granderson and helped rid the Tigers of either Bonderman's or Willis' salary, the Cubs could send back Bradley and maybe some cash. Don't know if that fits in the Cubs budget though.

I don't know if the Cubs have what it takes to get Granderson. The Yankees can at least offer Melky and either Joba or Phil Hughes and that may be enough to get Granderson.

If the Yanks trade for Granderson without trading AJAX
Sign Crawford

2011 OF
LF- Crawford / Swisher if crawford is not available
CF- Granderson
RFF-Austin Jackson

TD, I had to laugh when I saw you asking for Matt Kemp from the Dodgers for Granderson... Why would the Dodgers do that? Kemp is a younger better version of Granderson! As a Cub fan I also think that Jim Hendry has to be all over this. But as a Cub fan we normally go after one player all off season and don't get him (i.e. Brian Roberts and Jake Peavy).

Granderson's platoon splits are the worst I've ever seen for a pretty good player. OPS+ of 128 to 38 in 2009. And the 38 was with 199 PA's.... ie not a small sample size. His BAbip vs. lefties was .226 which obviously is a big contributor. His 2008 splits weren't bad but 2007 was pretty much the same as 2009...OPS+ of 156 to 40.

anyone who brought up him going to the cubs with bradley involved is a complete moron and needs to be shot. im a sox fan, and i would love for this guy to be on the team, but we have rios, and i dont see them trading to the sox, because they are a division rival. the royals arent a rival, more like a joke.

back to the cubs, why would they take on bradley? i wanna say hes owed 21 mil, and granderson 25? itd almost be a wash. if they could put a deal with fuld, fox, and some prospects maybe.

get him out of the AL cent! unless hes coming home to the southside

First, I can't believe they let Ordonez's ludacris option vest - and now have to trade some of our best players for salary relief...If we do trade EJax or Grandy, Willis, Maggs, N Robertson and Guillen better be in those deals too.

That said, I like the trade Mike put out there. Seems like the Yanks do actually match up in this case. Nothing the Cubs fans have put out there is even close.

What big market teams have the top prospect to put together to make a run at EJax and Granderson. How bout EJax, Granderson and Willis for A Jackson, Hughes, Montero and Melancon? Or the cubs with Smardja and Vitters for Granderson and N Robertson...Bumgardner and Sanchez for Grandy and Robertson - or Cain for Grandy straight up...

Any thoughts?

Trade for Granderson, Sign Holliday for 5 years(34 when contract runs out.

Jeter
Granderson (CF)
Teix
Rodriguez
Holliday (LF)
Cano
Matsui(DH)
Posada
Swisher(RF)

Thats Dynasty-esque.

Make it happen Cash.

Granderson to the Cubs will never happen. Fox, Fontenot, Fuld, etc are all fringe average ballplayers and the Tigers would want impact talent for Granderson which means one or more of Cashner, Vitters, or Castro. As a Cubs fan who is desperate for them to produce just one homegrown star I would not trade any of those three for Granderson who is already declining. Hendry will pass on that deal.

"How bout EJax, Granderson and Willis for A Jackson, Hughes, Montero and Melancon?"

I wouldn't touch that with a 10ft pole.

@ rob g

Boras can talk all he wants about a 3 or 4 yr deal...he ain't going to get it.

well...he's not going to get it from a team that johnny damon would be willing to play for.

If this is true, Wren has already called the Tigers about it now.

I can't see Hendry passing on this deal. If he could package up Fox, Colvin, and some pitching prospects, I'd be all for it. Vitters might make me a bit nervous, but for Granderson it might not be too bad. I'd say no to Castro though.

keep willis and yanks can keep hughes now thats a deal

im hoping Tigerdog was only kidding.

Granderson could be a great fit for numerous teams. I certainly wouldn't want to see the Cubs give up Starlin Castro for him through, Castro should be their everyday shortstop in 2011, hopefully with Theriot moving over to second.

"Granderson who is already declining. Hendry will pass on that deal."

Granderson certainly hasn't repeated his 2007 performance, but he's hardly declining, he's still an elite center fielder.

"anyone who brought up him going to the cubs with bradley involved is a complete moron and needs to be shot. im a sox fan, and i would love for this guy to be on the team, but we have rios, and i dont see them trading to the sox, because they are a division rival. the royals arent a rival, more like a joke.

back to the cubs, why would they take on bradley? i wanna say hes owed 21 mil, and granderson 25? itd almost be a wash. if they could put a deal with fuld, fox, and some prospects maybe.

get him out of the AL cent! unless hes coming home to the southside

Posted by: Joe | November 11, 2009 at 03:08 PM"

The reason I suggested Bradley is because I said take back Magglio or Guillen (add in cash with Guillen). I said it because I also said take back a terrible OF contract from DET.

Dodgers- Matt Kemp, George Sherrill, and James McDonald
Angels- Howie Kendrick, Maicer Izturis, and Jose Arredondo
Giants- Pablo Sandoval and Matt Cain
Cubbies? You don't match up.
Yankees- Hughes, Joba, and Cano
Twinkies- Denard Span, JJ Hardy, and Matt Guerrier
or Joe Mauer (we'll throw in Laird!)
Black Sox- Alexei Ramirez, Matt Thornton, and you have to take Magglio back!

Posted by: Tigerdog | November 11, 2009 at 02:15 PM "

What the HELL? Give up Kemp whos already better in all facets of the game.. Give up a closer and a Starting pitcher?
LMAO

Pablo and Cain? Dude you are on drugs.. I have a few friends who live in Michigan and they do a lot of LSD.. maybe its a state wide problem..

"Granderson to the Cubs will never happen. Fox, Fontenot, Fuld, etc are all fringe average ballplayers and the Tigers would want impact talent for Granderson which means one or more of Cashner, Vitters, or Castro. As a Cubs fan who is desperate for them to produce just one homegrown star I would not trade any of those three for Granderson who is already declining. Hendry will pass on that deal.

Posted by: bsuniceguy | November 11, 2009 at 03:09 PM"

Really? Fox can be a .65-.270 hitter with 30+ HR as a DH that can sub in at LF, RF, 3B, 1B, and C if needed (though he's not much defensively).

Fuld hit .299 last year, though it was only 53 games, but he can play all 3 OF spots with a great glove.

Fontenot isn't a fringe major leauger, but I would admit he's not a great player. Still, they could offer Blanco (fabulous on D, crap on O...) or Baker (very solid with D and O) instead, along with a young RP and Marshall or Gorzelanny.

.265-.270 on Fox, sorry for the typo.

Gleb, a couple adjustments in a potential post Halladay trade where the Jays get whatever prospacets they want and we take on Vernon Wells to get his salary off their books:

Jeter
Swisher (LF)
Tex
Arod
Holliday (DH)
Cano
Posada
Wells(RF)
Granderson

Much better defense and pitching with little sacrifice to hitting

Hendry wouldn't trade Vitters for Peavy - he's certainly not trading him for Granderson. Castro's not going anywhere either. The Cubs are extremely high on him as their future SS...which can only mean that he will probably suck and they will hold on to him for way too long much like their other recent top hitting prospects until he has absolutely no trade value.

The ONLY pieces the Cubs have of any significant trade value that would interest Det. are:

1. ARam
2. Marmol
3. Guzman
4. Castro
5. Wells

END OF LIST

Fire Dombrowski, quick!
The Dumbo that brought us $ 72 million in BAD contracts, is now shopping all the good contracts to keep the bad ones on the books!
And NO, the Tigers don't want Milton Bradley. Not even for free.
For Granderson?
Dodgers- Matt Kemp, George Sherrill, and James McDonald
Angels- Howie Kendrick, Maicer Izturis, and Jose Arredondo
Giants- Pablo Sandoval and Matt Cain
Cubbies? You don't match up.
Yankees- Hughes, Joba, and Cano
Twinkies- Denard Span, JJ Hardy, and Matt Guerrier
or Joe Mauer (we'll throw in Laird!)
Black Sox- Alexei Ramirez, Matt Thornton, and you have to take Magglio back!

Posted by: Tigerdog | November 11, 2009 at 02:15 PM

Pure idiocy. Kemp is already a better player than Granderson. Terrible trade idea.

Jeter
Granderson
Tex
Arod
Matsui(DH)
Cano
Posada
Wells
Swisher

SP:
CC, Roy, AJ, Pettite, EJax

BP:
Robertson, Acevas, Joba, Hughes, Mo

To Det:
AJax, Melancon, Gardner, Cervelli

To Tor:
Montero, Melky, Brackman, Horne,

I like Grandys game and I thought about possible trade scenarios yesterday. However, I have difficulty evaluating his worth.

a) He's not a good leadoff hitter. Period! Last year could be looked at as a down year but regardless of that, he has a .344 lifetime OBP, has averaged about 135 ko per season over the last 4 years and, despite having good speed, isn't an "elite" base stealing threat. Defensively, he has good enough speed to run down flies in the gap but too often I've seen him misread balls that either drop in front of him because he took a step backwards before going forward or vice versa. Power wise, you have to ask yourself is he a "true" legit power hitter or was this a flukish kind of year for him? Despite a career high in AB this year his numbers have basically regressed in almost every category over the last 3 years, except for HRS and a small increase (8+) in SB from last year.

All that being said, he is absolutely an improvement over Cabrera or Gardner. However, I think some of you are wayyyyy over estimating the return the Tigers should ask for him. Plain and simple, there's no way the Yanks would trade Cano + anyone else. I'm not even sure I would trade Cano straight up for Granderson. Part of the reason has to do with my belief that Cano may be on the upswing whereas Grandy might be on the decline. Another reason is because we simply don't have another 2B ready to step in. Would the Yanks minus Cano but plus Grandy really be that much of a better team? Debatable.

I'm not even sure the Yanks and Tigers really match up well in terms of needs vs position of strength. Assuming that the Tigers want more than prospects, I don't see a match. The Tigers can drop off $65 mil in salary next year and I think they can compete right now. So if they are not in a rebuilding mode then wouldn't they be better served getting mlb talent already in the majors? Yanks COULD dangle a package of Joba OR Hughes plus 1 of Ajax, Montero or ????, but that doesn't seem to help the Tigers in a major way for 2010.

So Yanks fans: how many of you would do granderson for hughes straight up?

Cubs get: Granderson & Bonderman

Tigers get: Marshall, Cashner, Fox, Fontenot.

** Det has no 2b option, they dump salary, and pick up a potential closer in a year or two with Cashner.

Cubs Line-up:

1. Theriot - SS
2. Granderson - CF
3. Lee - 1B
4. Ramirez - 3B
5. Soriano - LF
6. Soto - C
7. Fukudome - RF
8. Baker - 2B

Rotation:

1. Lilly
2. Zambrano
3. Dempster
4. Wells
5. Bonderman/Gorz

Dodgers- Matt Kemp, George Sherrill, and James McDonald
Angels- Howie Kendrick, Maicer Izturis, and Jose Arredondo
Giants- Pablo Sandoval and Matt Cain
Cubbies? You don't match up.
Yankees- Hughes, Joba, and Cano
Twinkies- Denard Span, JJ Hardy, and Matt Guerrier
or Joe Mauer (we'll throw in Laird!)
Black Sox- Alexei Ramirez, Matt Thornton, and you have to take Magglio back!

Posted by: Tigerdog | November 11, 2009 at 02:15 PM

Pure idiocy. Kemp is already a better player than Granderson. Terrible trade idea.

Posted by: Ivdown | November 11, 2009 at 03:39 PM
-------------

The hilarious part of that is, on one hand he's asking the Giants for Sandoval and Cain, the Yanks for Cano, Hughes and Joba, and Dodgers for Kemp, Sherrill and McDonald but is willing to accept Kendrick, Izturis and Arrendondo from the Angels.

YF, I wouldnt do Cano for Granderson straight up.

As for hughes, the yankees probably would need to sweeten it a bit but I wouldn't want to anyway. AJax is about a year away and melky plays a decent enough CF. I want the yanks to try and replace damons offensive output via FA and wait out austin

Guys, I'm almost positive Tigerdog was kidding. Haha Granderson definitely does NOT deserve that type of haul. Albiet he is a very good player. I would certainly expect a good return for Granderson, seeing EJax and Grandy on the trading block is really pissing me off though. Dombroski is the one that dug us into this hole, but I think he'd be very careful about trading EJax or Grandy.

That said, I hope they get packaged together for a blockbuster deal to replenish the farm system if they do get traded. He'd obviously be looking for either major league ready talent or top teir prospects. I understand they have their hands tied financially, but why are they trying to trade away the players that are going to be key contributors when the Tigers have a shot in 2011 and 2012?? I think they should be trying to dump the bad contracts, not that they really have any trade value, just wishful thinking...


(For Grandy and EJax)

To Det:
AJax, Melancon, Gardner, Cervelli

(For Halladay and Wells)

To Tor:
Montero, Melky, Brackman, Horne,


Posted by: mike | November 11, 2009 at 03:40 PM
-----------

You really could've kept that one in your pocket. Get ready for the response...wait for it....wait for it....BOMM (goes the dynamite).

"There is a rumor now of Jackson, Cashner and Fox for Granderson. Hmmmm."

Bdlugz, where did you hear this one?

If the Tigers trade Granderson and the fans perceive its a salary dump, attendance will plummet. The Tigers drew 3 million to Comerica in 2007, nearly that in 2008, more than 2.5 million in 2009, despite an economic depression in Detroit that shows no signs of abating.

Granderson isn't without flaws. He can't hit lefties and he strikes out. As he matures he is becoming a platoon power hitter who also happens to be a stellar center fielder. The Tigers hate to sit him against lefties because they have no comparable outfielder, few teams do.

Comerica's outfield is vast. If you put a below average center fielder out there, the opposition would spend the 2010 season turning outs into singles, singles into doubles, doubles into triples. The 2009 team overachieved primarily because of upgraded defense.

Granderson is a prince of a guy, the most popular Tiger player in Detroit since Al Kaline. Some fans would be mad if he were traded even up for Joe Mauer. If he is traded for what looks like salary relief, when he is earning his pay despite his faults, fans will desert the Tigers en masse.

Mike Ilitch has never been a penny pinching owner, either of the Tigers or the Red Wings. He pays top dollar for Miguel Cabrera and will try his best to keep Justin Verlander, the best Tiger pitcher maybe ever. He wouldn't cut Magglio despite a looming option and a career threatening slump. He is paying Carlos Guillen basically for past services rendered. He failed to predict the injuries to Bonderman, Willis and Nate Robertson, and is saddled with terrible contracts as a result.

Dumping E Jackson would be a vote of no confidence in his seemingly achy shoulder. Dumping Granderson, very different story.

I'll be very surprised if this happens.

pmc765: Nice post.

I would like to see something like Samardzija, Bradley, Wellington Castillo, and Fox or Fontenot for Granderson and Bonderman might get it done.

Fox
Caridad
Fontenot
Bradley

for

Granderson
Bonderman or Willis

thoughts?

pmc765, you hit the nail right on the head. Grandy might not be the best CF, but he is basically the face of the franchise.

And sure the Bondo, Robertson, Willis and Magglio deals seem like lemons now, but you have to consider that Bonderman and Robertson were having career years AND stellar post-season results when those contracts were negotiated. The Tigers just got really unlucky that they became injury prone. Also, Magglio put up career numbers and won the 2007 batting title. Willis was just a bad deal in general...

I'm in agreeance with most people and just say that the Tigers keep their cheap stars, do what they can in 2010, and look forward to 2011. There isn't a lot of off-season action for the Tigers to look forward to.

On a more positive note, a lot of prospects/minor leaguers really proved their worth down the stretch. Ryan Raburn seemed to be the ONLY Tiger who could produce hits in clutch situations..his fielding wasn't stellar, but I think more playing time would do him some good.

Also, Eddie Bonine doesn't get nearly enough credit. He didn't win very many games as a Tiger, but I attribute that to poor run support. He had a perfect game into the 6th inning in a MUST win game against the White Sox. He ended up only giving up one hit, which unfortunately ended up being a two-run homer, but with the kind of line up the Tigers had, there was no excuse to lose that game 2-0 especially when the pitcher throws a one hitter..

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment


Top Stories



Search MLBTR

Lijit Search

MLBTR Features



Recent Posts


MLBTR Mailing List

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Rumors By Team



Monthly Archives


Live Chats


Tuesdays at 2 p.m. CST



Site Map     Contact     About     Advertise     Privacy Policy     Widget     Twitter     Rss Feed


MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com.