![]() |
|
|
| |
« 2010 Top 50 Free Agents | Main | Rangers Would Consider Dealing For Bradley »
The Blue Jays will look for quality over quantity if they deal Roy Halladay this winter, according to Joel Sherman of the New York Post. As one Blue Jays official says, the team will obtain two draft picks if they let Doc walk after 2010, so top young talent is a must in any trade.
"We would rather have one above-average impact guy than eight ordinary guys," the official said.
That's hardly a surprise, given that the Jays were demanding multiple top prospects for Halladay this summer, when names like Clay Buchholz, Derek Holland, Justin Smoak and Kyle Drabek popped up in trade talks. Executives tell Sherman that the Jays aren't likely to obtain as much for their ace now as they could have this summer.
Halladay, who will earn a base salary of $15.75MM next year, will hit free agency after the season, so Jays GM Alex Anthopoulos can't demand as much as his predecessor, J.P. Ricciardi.
However, this year's class of starting pitchers falls off after John Lackey, so executives expect the Jays to field strong offers for the 2003 Cy Young Award winner. And Anthopoulos has committed "unprecedented" resources to scouting, so it may make sense for the club to deal Halladay and spend in other areas.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
Victorino and Happ. Eh?
Posted by: worldchamps08 | November 10, 2009 at 08:21 AM
Maybe if he wins Cy Young they can get even more than they could in the summer considering that would mean he WAS the best pitcher, even in the hardest division... Just a thought.
Posted by: Darion | November 10, 2009 at 08:23 AM
Here we go again boys countless of pointless rumors
Posted by: derman1984 | November 10, 2009 at 08:23 AM
I would hope they would want quality over quantity. Their new GM should be ran out of town if they just went with quantity
Posted by: allstarlineup | November 10, 2009 at 08:27 AM
"Here we go again boys countless of pointless rumors"
Welcome to Baseball's offseason, its the Hot Stove, not the honest stove.
Halladay won't win the Cy Young, there are a good few pitchers ahead of him. (Greinke, King Felix, CC Sabathia). But he will probably earn the Jays a good number of decent to great prospects. All i know for near certainty is that he won't be pitching in the AL east next year.
Posted by: Aranathor | November 10, 2009 at 08:32 AM
Could you imagine a Phillie rotation with Roy Halladay, Cliff Lee, and Cole Hamels? That would be fun to watch.
Posted by: Arock1234 | November 10, 2009 at 08:33 AM
I got one. I got one.
Juan Pierre. Straight up for Roy Halladay.
Posted by: ThinkBlue | November 10, 2009 at 08:34 AM
Can you imagine a Brave rotation with Roy Halladay Javy Vazquez, Tim Hudson, Jair Jurrjens, and Tommy Hanson? Even better... lol.
Posted by: Darion | November 10, 2009 at 08:36 AM
I would let Buchholz go If the Jays would go easy on how many players they took.
Buchholz/Bowden/Anderson/Westmoreland
I still think the Sox need a power hitter over a pitcher though, and i dont think that offer would please the Jays enough, I think their stubborn on Halladay
Posted by: 04Forever | November 10, 2009 at 08:36 AM
I still believe strongly that Roy will still be a Jay in April, he will pitch till the deadline then we will see. Teams will throw their firstborns at Roy then if there team needs a starter
Posted by: 04Forever | November 10, 2009 at 08:42 AM
Can you imagine a Brave rotation with Roy Halladay Javy Vazquez, Tim Hudson, Jair Jurrjens, and Tommy Hanson? Even better... lol.
Posted by: Darion
Pretty sure Toronto is going to want one of Hanson/Jurrjens
I would let Buchholz go If the Jays would go easy on how many players they took.
Buchholz/Bowden/Anderson/Westmoreland
That is a horrible deal for a one year rental. Toronto would be lucky to get just Buchholz. Toronto F'd themselves(well actually JP did) when they didn't deal him this summer. The return on him is probably going to be 50-60% of what they could have gotten.
Buchholz and Westmoreland are about as untouchable as it gets for the Sox. Only pitcher Buchholz gets shipped out is for Felix. And you won't see Westmoreland dealt unless it's for a high impact bat.
Posted by: BoSox | November 10, 2009 at 08:45 AM
I'm surprised to keep reading that Halladay's value has dropped significantly now that teams would be just getting one year of his services, therefore they wouldn't give up more than one quality prospect for him.
This is not true, any team that would acquire Halladay is also getting two 1st round draft choices, a significant fact that should not be overlooked. Those two picks alone has the value of at least one quality prospect.
Posted by: Peter D | November 10, 2009 at 08:49 AM
If Doc played for a decent team in the NL, he'd win 30 games. the AL East had 3 of the top 5 offenses in the AL last year, and Doc pitched against BOS, NYY, and Tampa Bay 5 times each. 15 of his 32 starts against 3 of the top 5 offenses in the AL, and he still had a 2.79 ERA, 1.13 WHIP, 239ip, and 9 CG. His year-to-year consistency against the best offenses in the league is what sets Halladay apart from all the other 'great' pitchers. Greinke had a great year in 2009. Didn't face the Yankees once, pitched against Boston once, pitched against TB twice.
Posted by: plaing | November 10, 2009 at 08:51 AM
That is a horrible deal for a one year rental. Toronto would be lucky to get just Buchholz. Toronto F'd themselves(well actually JP did) when they didn't deal him this summer. The return on him is probably going to be 50-60% of what they could have gotten.
To be honest I thought what J.P. was asking from the phillies was pretty decent. I mean that same deal went to Cleveland for Cliff Lee and I just dont see that deal working out for the tribe. Carrassco is overrated. He had like an ERA in the 6's down in AAA and Jason Knapp is recovering from a brutual injury. Roy Hallada is one of a kind and the price better be high if the jays trade him. He is probably the second best pitcher ever to pitch for the jays..
Posted by: Arock1234 | November 10, 2009 at 08:55 AM
How about Bradley for Halladay? That would be fair... :)
Posted by: holycow | November 10, 2009 at 08:58 AM
"...it may make sense for the club to deal Halladay and spend in other areas."
No it wouldn't. Halladay's contract has about $25M in surplus value. If you can get even close to that doing something else, you should do BOTH things.
Posted by: Torgen | November 10, 2009 at 08:59 AM
BoSox, I was NOT saying the Braves would do it, neither should they, but just imagine a rotation with those 5.
And the Braves have a deep enough farm system to where we wouldn't have to offer Hanson, Jurrjens, or Heyward. I'd imagine it would have Schafer, Medlen, and maybe 1 other top prospect. Not sure if that would get it done, but it would be close.
Posted by: Darion | November 10, 2009 at 09:05 AM
Buchholtz for 1 year of Halladay and two 1st round draft choices. You think that the Jays would be lucky to get this return?
Good thing you're not a GM
Posted by: Peter D | November 10, 2009 at 09:12 AM
plaing, you are correct in that Halladay would dominate the NL--a fact that is downright scary.
But to insinuate that Greinke didn't have a 'great' year because he didn't face the Yankees and only pitched against the Red Sox once is absurd. Typical East Coast BS. Greinke also didn't get the luxury of pitching against the Royals-something Halladay and CC both got to. You are looking at an ERA under 2 if Greinke pitches against the Royals.
Posted by: Trusting the Process | November 10, 2009 at 09:12 AM
Braves are more than set; no point in even bringing them up here. The Rangers have the pieces, but probably not the $ to lock him up. The best fit is still Boston. They've got the prospects as well as MLB ready pitching. They've got the $. And they know they're going to have to do something dramatic to compete with NY.
Posted by: drphonic7 | November 10, 2009 at 09:18 AM
"I would let Buchholz go If the Jays would go easy on how many players they took.
Buchholz/Bowden/Anderson/Westmoreland"
Buchholz should win 13-14, and Halladay 17-18. I'm not giving up the farm system for one year of 4 extra wins. IRT the draft comp, Buchholz alone is easily worth a low #1 and #2 sanwich.
Posted by: Joey B | November 10, 2009 at 09:26 AM
Am I really going to have to kick out the first non-sarcastic awful trade proposal in here? Darn.
Although the Phillies are in the discussion, I do believe that Halladay (unforunately) goes within the division to either the Red Sox or the Yankees.
For the Yankees, a possible trade for Halladay could be...
AJax/Kennedy/McAllister/Venditte (for shits and giggles)
Now before you rip on me, know that I'm not a Yankee fan nor do I know how much the Yankee fans value those prospects. Be kind.
The Blue Jays get Jackson and Kennedy, who can both start right now and McAllister, a AA pitcher with good size and velocity and a very high ceiling.
Venditte was just thrown in place of what should be a PTBNL, which should be an A-ball player with a high ceiling as well.
Posted by: TwinRoyals | November 10, 2009 at 09:39 AM
It really is amusing to read some of these comments as a Jays fan.
Doc is the best pitcher in baseball. Period. As much as ball fans like to think they know how good Doc is, they will REALLY know it when he goes to a fashionable team in the US.
Why the hell some of you are looking to hold back on second-raters and unproven prospects is beyond me. Doc will put any half-decent team over the top, especially in the NL (btw, if he goes to an NL team, I will place a heavy wager on him to break pitching records)
And if you know anything about Doc the man, you'll know the team he is traded to WILL have an excellent chance of tying him to an extension. A loyal fellow and a thoroughly decent guy.
Seriously, keep your unproven prospects and also-rans if you want to. I'd be happy to experience one more year of Doc in Toronto and take the two draft picks. He is something special.
Posted by: Theodore | November 10, 2009 at 09:43 AM
Just to add:
There is NO proposed deal on the table that would guarantee the Jays' future success.
And there is no guarantee that, say, Drabek, Taylor and Brown guarantee the Phillies' future success.
The ONE guarantee on the table is that adding Doc to the frontline of a decent team WILL make them strong contenders for a WS spot.
That is worth paying for. If the positions were reversed, I'd do whatever it takes to get Halladay. Pat Gillick had it right.
Posted by: Theodore | November 10, 2009 at 09:53 AM
It also makes me laugh when Boston fans don't want to mortgage their future.
Your team has a ridiculously big budget, the only reason you have a minor league system is so that you can trade these players for proven studs. Boston and the Yankees can buy whoever they want.
Posted by: Peter D | November 10, 2009 at 10:01 AM
To be honest the Bo-Sox should keep their prospects and not worry about Halladay.
Yankees are going to dominate next year anyways so whats the point of trying?
Especially if they sign Lackey ! and Cameron to play center. Domination all over again.
Though it is cute to think anyone else has a chance.
That said I hope Halladay does go to the NL. The Jays just need some building pieces and a few upside guys to go with all the draft picks they will have this year and Antholopoulos's new commitment to signing them.
Halladay in the NL would be SCARY ! He would decimate most lineup and be a def Cy young contender, sorry Timmy.
Posted by: BaseBallz | November 10, 2009 at 10:06 AM
But to insinuate that Greinke didn't have a 'great' year because he didn't face the Yankees and only pitched against the Red Sox once is absurd. Typical East Coast BS. Greinke also didn't get the luxury of pitching against the Royals-something Halladay and CC both got to. You are looking at an ERA under 2 if Greinke pitches against the Royals.
Posted by: Trusting the Process | November 10, 2009 at 09:12 AM
Doc faced the Royals once, and the Yankees and Red Sox a combined total of nine times. No question that Greinke had a great year, and probably deserves the Cy, but had he been run through those two line-ups nine times, I think his numbers look quite a bit different.
Posted by: olerud4pm | November 10, 2009 at 10:07 AM
Theordore,
Get your reasoned and rational arguments out of here - were not in the buisness of making cents, but dollars.
Though a great point, as well as a point well made.
Posted by: BaseBallz | November 10, 2009 at 10:08 AM
As a Dodger fan i would like to see Doc in the rotation. Although if it means totally raiding the system I am out because it would tear down what we have been building. But as long as we are throwing out proposals here is one that would never happen but would fit both teams.
Doc
for
Bills, Martin, Withrow, Hu, and DeWitt or DeJeusus
but he then there goes all future trades for the Dodgers because there goes the imediate farm system.
Posted by: camronj427 | November 10, 2009 at 10:15 AM
TwinRoyals,
The Blue Jays would hang up on Cashman in a heartbeat. Kennedy was injured all year after struggling. AJax looks like a solid regular, not a star. Montero and Hughes or Chamberlain would definitely be required.
Trusting the Process,
No one is saying Greinke didn't have a great year, and it's not East Coast bias to say the AL East has three of the top offenses in baseball, and that Greinke had an easier time by not facing them.
Posted by: aap212 | November 10, 2009 at 10:20 AM
"I got one. I got one. Juan Pierre. Straight up for Roy Halladay."
Highly unlikely. The Jays don't run and they won't give up pitching without getting it in return.
"If Doc played for a decent team in the NL, he'd win 30 games."
No one has won 25 games in either league in over 30 years. It's been 75 years since 30 has been won in the NL. Why would that change now?
"It really is amusing to read some of these comments as a Jays fan."
The media is at everyone's fingertips.
Posted by: stevenevents | November 10, 2009 at 10:27 AM
Since when is giving up the farm for one year of a great starting pitcher a guarantee to win? Do we really need to go down the list of pitchers who were great and then suffered an injury or ineffectiveness. Halladay is awesome but he carries a fair amount of risk.
As for the draft picks - you get less than a 50/50 chance that you will receive 2 first round picks for the guys.
If a team with a protected pick gets him you get one sandwich pick and one 2nd round pick. Then there is the possibility that he could sign with a team that has already signed another Type A that is ranked higher. Think it can't happen - ask the Brewers about that. They landed a sandwich pick and a late 2nd rounder for CC last year. Or remember the Jays own history - how has that 3rd round pick for type A pitcher, AJ Burnett, turning out.
Posted by: bjsguess | November 10, 2009 at 10:39 AM
Greinke certainly had a great year, but he just didn't face the caliber of hitting Doc did. Same thing happened with Cliff Lee in '09:
http://www.baseballprospectus.com/unfiltered/?p=1012
Posted by: plaing | November 10, 2009 at 10:42 AM
How about him in a 4 way Trade?
The Mets get him to be in front of Santana and Overbay to play 1B.
The Blue Jays get Bradley to be DH/RF,Nick Evans to be LF/1B,Marte future 3B or 1B,Pelfrey-Starter,Holt-Starter,Purnell-Bullpen and Castillo 2B with Hill moving back to SS
Cubs get BJ Upton to play 2b intill Castro's ready then to CF
Rays get Koyie Hill to Catcher,League to Close
Posted by: Matt Galvin | November 10, 2009 at 10:50 AM
really that trader does not seem feasible for the simple fact that the rays will be gettin Koyie Hill out of it and they are giving up BJ Upton. If you are going to trade Upton I would think they can get more value. Plus the Rays are in no rush to trade upton. If they dont Believe Navarro is that great why not go after Kendall and or Zaun to be that stop gap
Posted by: camronj427 | November 10, 2009 at 11:00 AM
"Since when is giving up the farm for one year of a great starting pitcher a guarantee to win? Do we really need to go down the list of pitchers who were great and then suffered an injury or ineffectiveness. Halladay is awesome but he carries a fair amount of risk."
Once again, the point is being missed.
The is no such thing as GUARANTEED SUCCESS in baseball. All you can do is put the best lineup on the field that you can. The Yankees bought the talent this season and crushed it. If the Phillies had taken Halladay AND Lee instead of 'protecting the farm', they would have had a much finer shot at doing the double (and the treble in 2010)
Any team 'interested' in Halladay is welcome to keep their prospects if they wish. Trust me - if I had the choice of inking Halladay to a five year extension OR taking the top three prospects from any farm...I'd keep Halladay. He is so much more than just a win machine - he is a franchise face, a mentor to younger pitchers, a role model to the team, and the 'right kind' of baseball player.
We're only talking trades because Halladay wants to leave. Let's not pretend for a moment that the Jays or the fans are the ones who want this. We'd all much rather keep him, so you can understand why we roll our eyes when other fans are reluctant to talk about their top prospects in return for the world's best pitcher...
Posted by: Theodore | November 10, 2009 at 11:05 AM
How about him in a 4 way Trade?
The Mets get him to be in front of Santana and Overbay to play 1B.
The Blue Jays get Bradley to be DH/RF,Nick Evans to be LF/1B,Marte future 3B or 1B,Pelfrey-Starter,Holt-Starter,Purnell-Bullpen and Castillo 2B with Hill moving back to SS
Cubs get BJ Upton to play 2b intill Castro's ready then to CF
Rays get Koyie Hill to Catcher,League to Close
Posted by: Matt Galvin | November 10, 2009 at 10:50 AM
Lol why should the Rays do that horrible trade???
BJ has a lot more value than everyone thinks.
Posted by: LGRS | November 10, 2009 at 11:05 AM
"How about him in a 4 way Trade?
The Mets get him to be in front of Santana and Overbay to play 1B.
The Blue Jays get Bradley to be DH/RF,Nick Evans to be LF/1B,Marte future 3B or 1B,Pelfrey-Starter,Holt-Starter,Purnell-Bullpen and Castillo 2B with Hill moving back to SS
Cubs get BJ Upton to play 2b intill Castro's ready then to CF
Rays get Koyie Hill to Catcher,League to Close"
Posted by: Matt Galvin | November 10, 2009 at 10:50 AM
Are you really that stupid? What did the Jays do to deserve 3 awful contracts after giving up Roy Halladay and Lyle Overbay? Let me guess....Mets fan? I thought so. That would never EVER happen in a million years.
Posted by: Darion | November 10, 2009 at 11:13 AM
"Since when is giving up the farm for one year of a great starting pitcher..."
Just to add (again): Halladay is that increasingly-rare breed of man to show loyalty to those who back him. "One year rental" is a term that gets banded about a lot, but any Jays fan will tell you that the chances of Halladay signing an extension would be darn good.
Posted by: Theodore | November 10, 2009 at 11:14 AM
"How about him in a 4 way Trade?
The Mets get him to be in front of Santana and Overbay to play 1B.
The Blue Jays get Bradley to be DH/RF,Nick Evans to be LF/1B,Marte future 3B or 1B,Pelfrey-Starter,Holt-Starter,Purnell-Bullpen and Castillo 2B with Hill moving back to SS
Cubs get BJ Upton to play 2b intill Castro's ready then to CF
Rays get Koyie Hill to Catcher,League to Close"
Posted by: Matt Galvin
I have to ask: do you read MLBTR? The Blue Jays have made it very clear that if they move Halladay, they want QUALITY not quantity in return and, they want no part of Milton Bradley!
One of the silliest trade ever proposed on this site . . . Mets get Halladay - the guy nearly every other team wants and a starting 1B as well - without giving up anyone of high value and the Blue Jays get two very expensive, aging players who cost more than Halladay. Yeah, right.
Posted by: bernie | November 10, 2009 at 11:16 AM
How about him in a 4 way Trade?
The Mets get him to be in front of Santana and Overbay to play 1B.
The Blue Jays get Bradley to be DH/RF,Nick Evans to be LF/1B,Marte future 3B or 1B,Pelfrey-Starter,Holt-Starter,Purnell-Bullpen and Castillo 2B with Hill moving back to SS
Cubs get BJ Upton to play 2b intill Castro's ready then to CF
Rays get Koyie Hill to Catcher,League to Close
---------------------
I'm sure the Jays would be thrilled to take all the crap from the thinnest farm system in the Majors plus Bradley and Castillo's contract in a heartbeat.
Oh and I'm sure the Rays will be thrilled to give up a former number 2 overall draft pick for a 30 year old minor league journeyman.
What the heck are you smoking, man?
Posted by: TwinRoyals | November 10, 2009 at 11:17 AM
"I mean that same deal went to Cleveland for Cliff Lee and I just dont see that deal working out for the tribe."
it was not even close to the same deal. we robbed cleveland in that deal. economically the tribe saw no real way to keep lee past his option year/free agency and the phils took advantage. all these names you keep hearing--happ, drabek, taylor, brown, gose, etc. are all A-prospects that were, in some combination, considered in roy halladay deal at the trade deadline. the guys that went to cleveland--knapp, carrasco, donald and i cant even think of the fourth--were not at the level of the previous guys mentioned. believe me, i wanted halladay at the deadline in the worst way. but the cliff lee deal was much more valuable in terms of what we got versus what we gave up.
and call me crazy, but i really dont see halladay going to an AL east bigshot. if he wants to play on a contending team he can go to the phils, dodgers, mets, cubs, cards--money permitting.
worldchamps08: i like ur take on things here. but beltre, if he comes here, which i think u and i would both like to see, is going to be 10mil a year for 3years option 4th. i also think victorino might be a guy shuffled around this offseason, since he has no current contract and played himself into a starting CF position.
Posted by: jrollpatrol2008 | November 10, 2009 at 11:31 AM
"As for the draft picks - you get less than a 50/50 chance that you will receive 2 first round picks for the guys."
A) No one will be rated higher than Halladay, therefore the situation where the Jays got a 3rd round pick for Burnett can not happen.
B) Halladay will only go to a team that he thinks can win the WS. Therefore he will not sign with a draft pick protected team.
I'd say it's about as close to a lock as you can get that you will get a first round pick plus a supplement 1st round pick. That is if he even leaves as a free agent.
Posted by: Peter D | November 10, 2009 at 11:41 AM
jrollpatrol2008,
Funny thing is that when Doc was on the trading block a few months back, all the Phillies fans were trying to push the likes of Donald, Knapp and Carrasco onto us.
"We'll give you Happ, Brown, Donald and Carrasco. That's fair"
We didn't want the trash. And we took criticism for it.
For all Ricciardi's faults, I thank Christ that he didn't succumb to such a deal. People may say the Jays are in a weaker bargaining position now, but I don't believe that. At least now teams know what's expected from them...and there's more of 'em to deal with.
Posted by: Theodore | November 10, 2009 at 11:42 AM
"the guys that went to cleveland--knapp, carrasco, donald and i cant even think of the fourth--were not at the level of the previous guys mentioned. believe me, i wanted halladay at the deadline in the worst way. but the cliff lee deal was much more valuable in terms of what we got versus what we gave up."
Yah, bang on jroll, that was a great deal for the Phil's the Tribe really got fleeced on that trade, them willing to take that trade really took the legs away from Riccardi, that, and him being a moron.
Halladay to the Dodgers would be intriguing and he would definetly do well there. The Mets/Cards/cubs really don't have the type of guys though that could conceivably make up a package for Halladay im afraid.
The Mets trading for anyone is really just a joke perpetuated by Mets fans that no one else finds funny anymore. Mets fans, please stop beating a dead horse, you can't trade for anyone, face it !
Posted by: BaseBallz | November 10, 2009 at 11:46 AM
Okay Bradley to the Mets with Overbay heading to the Cubs and Aybar heading to the Cubs to.
Cubs then could the trade Overbay to the Giants for Zito and so on and Lee to the Tigers for Inge,Willis,Ordonez.
I like the Florida
Teams,Cardinals and anybody else then the Yankees.
Posted by: Matt Galvin | November 10, 2009 at 11:57 AM
A dodgers deal around Bills and Martin doesn't seem too bad. Kershaw even better lol.
Posted by: juiced | November 10, 2009 at 12:10 PM
The Dodgers have that much more to trade than the Mets do? Don't get me wrong, the Dodgers farm system has done a great job, and they have better young major league talent, but they're not going to trade any of it to get Halladay. If you take Kershaw, Billingsley, Kemp, and Martin off the trade table, what exactly are the Dodgers going to trade that the Blue Jays want for Halladay? The young, raw Gordon? The lower upside McDonald? Corner infielders without much power or middle infielders with positional issues? It suddenly starts to sound like Mets trade chips.
Posted by: aap212 | November 10, 2009 at 12:15 PM
I think a trade centered around Hu and Martin - both players of positions of which the Jays are in need - would do. I don't really understand it myself, but it does seem like the the Dodgers are willing to trade Martin. The Dodgers do seem to have USEFUL pieces necessary for a trade. And they're definitely in need of a bonified ace. The Mets have nothing.
Posted by: drphonic7 | November 10, 2009 at 01:30 PM
"Just to add (again): Halladay is that increasingly-rare breed of man to show loyalty to those who back him. "One year rental" is a term that gets banded about a lot, but any Jays fan will tell you that the chances of Halladay signing an extension would be darn good."
It doesn't really matter. Once a player becomes market value, he really offers the team no advantage. Signing a SS with a WAR of 6 that you really need doesn't differ materially from signing an SP with a WAR of 6 for the same amount. Depending on the price, a lot of teams would be better off waiting for him to hit the market.
Posted by: Joey B | November 10, 2009 at 02:22 PM
They could wait, but do they want to win in 2010 or not. Halladay is just the kind of player that could feasibly push a good team over to championship team, and I do believe the Dodgers could score Halladay without giving up either Billingsley or Kershaw.
Posted by: drphonic7 | November 10, 2009 at 03:32 PM
Doc should command at least as much as bedard did! Only way he gets moved is for something like Taylor, Drabek and Brown + one more. That is what it should and will take to get him. I realize every fan thinks this is just a one year deal, but you get freaking Halladay and two picks if he leaves. The package has to be worth at least that amount. That means Bucholtz, Bowden and one or more of westmoreland, Kalish, or Reddick for the Sox. If you don't get that Jays should hold onto him and get the picks.
Posted by: joemorgan=#1 | November 10, 2009 at 06:11 PM
So Matt Galvin-
Are the Rays supposed to get anything in your Aybar/Bradley/Overbay trade, or would they give Willy up just as thanks for being involved in your trade?
Posted by: CubFanRaysaddict | November 10, 2009 at 07:34 PM
Lets look at this.Halladay
is 34,will he be the same player in 3-4 years?The longer the Jays wait to trade him the less they will get.When they do trade
him will they give that team a chance to sign him to a longer contract?They wouldn't let any team sign him to a longer contract this yeaar when they were talking to different teams.If not then your taking a very big risk to gave up your best minor league players for a 1 year or mid season rental.Big risk to take if you are a GM.
Posted by: SullyLV. | November 10, 2009 at 07:41 PM
Should be only one (a) in year.
Posted by: SullyLV. | November 10, 2009 at 07:43 PM
theodore,
lets face it. players play the game to win a championship. we all like to think our favorite players display some sort of loyalty, but that is not always the case. halladay, however, seems to be a competitive guy who wants to play on a perennial contender. more teams fit that discription than the yankees and redsox. if/when he leaves toronto, i dont see how he would go to the division rivals rather than come to the national league and have the chance to destroy yanks/red sox in a world series. halladay seems to me like the kind of guy that would rather play against the AL bigshots rather than team up with them. especially if money isnt the deciding factor for Roy, then i think he should come to the nl and help lead a team to the playoffs and beyond.
Posted by: jrollpatrol2008 | November 11, 2009 at 08:49 AM
"They could wait, but do they want to win in 2010 or not. Halladay is just the kind of player that could feasibly push a good team over to championship team, and I do believe the Dodgers could score Halladay without giving up either Billingsley or Kershaw."
Feasibly is the key word. Lee is about as good, but it didn't guarantee the Phillies anything. For the RS, it should guarantee another 4-5 wins over what Buchholz will. Throw in the two draft picks, and maybe it's worth it.
But if I can simply sign Lackey, having both Lackey and Buchholz in the rotation is better than having Halladay and Wakefield in the rotation, and I get to keep the prospects. Same with the NYY and Santana/CC. Why trade the farm for Santana when you can just CC for the same money and forfeit a draft pick?
Posted by: Joey B | November 11, 2009 at 09:37 AM
"Doc should command at least as much as bedard did! Only way he gets moved is for something like Taylor, Drabek and Brown + one more. That is what it should and will take to get him. I realize every fan thinks this is just a one year deal, but you get freaking Halladay and two picks if he leaves. The package has to be worth at least that amount. That means Bucholtz, Bowden and one or more of westmoreland, Kalish, or Reddick for the Sox. If you don't get that Jays should hold onto him and get the picks."
If the BJs hold out for that, it's a lose/lose proposition. Buchholz is better than the two draft picks, and Drabek and Taylor possibly each better than the two picks. Holding onto Halladay rather than trading him means you just spent $15M you don't have, and have two draft picks worth less than the top player of either deal.
Posted by: Joey B | November 11, 2009 at 09:41 AM