![]() |
|
|
| |
« Jocketty Downplays Payroll Concerns | Main | Offseason Outlook: St. Louis Cardinals »
A batch of links to kick off the work week...
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
CHONE projections are terrible, he has guys on there that arent even with orginizations anymore
Posted by: stlcardsfan5 | November 16, 2009 at 08:38 AM
Why would the Jays want to waste al that awesome 2ndbase gold glove talent at 3rd base? I pretty sure Brandon Phillips is a better 2baseman with more range than Aaron Hill despite the added errors.
Posted by: Ethanator99 | November 16, 2009 at 08:44 AM
I guess the Jays didn't like Encarnacion.
HAHAHAHAHAHA! Man I was so pumped when the Reds got rid of that clown.
Posted by: Ethanator99 | November 16, 2009 at 08:48 AM
How could anyone criticize projections that have Sal Fasano hitting five home runs in 2010? :)
"HAHAHAHAHAHA! Man I was so pumped when the Reds got rid of that clown."
You mean when they traded him with two young, upside pitchers for the rights to pay Scott Rolen $11MM this season?
That doesn't seem like too much to get excited about.
Posted by: MorneauVP | November 16, 2009 at 08:52 AM
My Chone projection has him signing with the White Sox.
Posted by: Boh | November 16, 2009 at 09:10 AM
Hmmm
Pablo Sandoval is going to lose 20 pts off his average and hit 10 fewer HR's??
Posted by: 55saveslives | November 16, 2009 at 09:11 AM
Chris Duncan hitting 12 hr's! lol....slow day here?
Posted by: stlcards16 | November 16, 2009 at 09:23 AM
I admit, I am ever skeptical over the excessive and I beleive hardly accurate stats such as Fangragh UZR, and player value, but this CHONE thing is unreal.
2009 Yankees and Redsox had 6 players (combined) with over 100 runs scored and two more in the mid to upper 90's. 2010, Zero over 100 runs? 2009 Yankees and Redsox had 6 players over a .380 OBP. 2010 2, right at .381.
That is just a small sample, I cannot imagine what other teams look like.
Can we get 2009 CHONE published so we can see what that looked like?
Posted by: go sox | November 16, 2009 at 09:27 AM
The Reds possibly trading Phillips to the Jays to play 3B?
There is something intensely sad about a team trading away young players to get another team's aging, fragile, highly-paid 3B, then ending up in a payroll crunch and having to trade their star 2B to the same team as a 3B to clear payroll.
My sympathies are with you, Reds fans.
Posted by: Sour Bob | November 16, 2009 at 09:49 AM
go sox- the runs projection probably have to deal with the Games Played projection,. They have ARod missing 30 games, Tex missing 16, Jeter missing 20, Cano missing.
Didnt look at Boston's roster but I'm sure its similar. (Not making excuses for CHONE, just saying)
Posted by: Deanezag | November 16, 2009 at 09:57 AM
ryan howard the only person breaking 100 rbis in the nl east? hanley ramirez batting in the #3 spot and getting like 77 rbis? manny ramirez only getting 70 something rbis? this is pointless
Posted by: metsfan23 | November 16, 2009 at 10:03 AM
How is Reggie Willits, who hasn't hit a homerun since little league, going to hit two?
Posted by: angelsfan67 | November 16, 2009 at 10:06 AM
How does Reyes only get 9 triples in a season at Citi!! Makes no sense at all.
Posted by: diehardmets | November 16, 2009 at 10:07 AM
There is something clearly wrong with the CHONE model, it is way too conservative. Pujol's projection is one of the few that looks plausible, but that's not exactly a tough call.
Posted by: Schrute | November 16, 2009 at 10:16 AM
Just like so many voodoo ratings that many here like to use, this is yet another horse crap one, only Sean Smith fails to even update on players long gone, like 6+ month guys released from an organization. Take Brad Wilkerson and Maldonado for example that were un ceremoniously given walking papers for being unable to hit AAA pitching any longer.. Like waaaayyy back in May-June of 2009. Smith, if you are going to attempt to use some kind of Cystal Ball to forcast the future, at least make an attempt to get some sense of current roster conditions correct.
Baloney....
Posted by: johns | November 16, 2009 at 10:17 AM
Thank you Sour Bob for your sympathies. Rooting for the Reds under the current regime is absolutely brutal. Thanks to the Bermuda Triangle of Incompetence that is owner Bob Castellini, idiot manager Dusty Baker and stroke-addled GM Jocketty, there is no hope in Redville.
Posted by: Monroe Says | November 16, 2009 at 10:28 AM
diehardmets,
Does Citifield actually suppress triples? I would imagine a healthy Reyes playing in a park with a huge outfield could actually hit more triples, though he would lose a couple of home runs.
But overall, yeah, I'll just wait for PECOTA before I care about any projections.
Posted by: aap212 | November 16, 2009 at 10:37 AM
Varitek is going to hit 13 HR?
David Ortiz is going to reach 30 HR, 100 RBI, and reach .250?
That's some powerful stuff they are smoking. Sign me up.
Posted by: UGotRPK3113 | November 16, 2009 at 10:51 AM
CHONE Projections?
I'm a Dodger fan, so here's my point of reference...
Mitch Jones is going to hit 2 fewer home runs in 40 fewer games than Matt Kemp? And with 2 silver sluggers in the OF, both of whom are maturing and improving, neither will knock in 100 RBIs? Silly...
Posted by: openid.aol.com/mrcourt123 | November 16, 2009 at 11:10 AM
Maybe if you guys looked at real stats instead of runs and RBIs you'd be able to put forth some sort of meaningful criticism.
Posted by: Ben Fink | November 16, 2009 at 11:17 AM
what's your suggestion Ben? what's the real stat we should look at?
Posted by: stlcards16 | November 16, 2009 at 11:27 AM
Preferably something that the player has actual control over. It's like getting mad because a projection misses a pitcher's wins.
Look at something more likely to be constant with a player: OPS, etc.
I'm not saying the projections are good, I haven't looked at them.
Posted by: Ben Fink | November 16, 2009 at 11:34 AM
Well, for one, how about taking the CHONE projections with a grain of salt.
All of the projection systems have numerous flaws, even the best ones like PECOTA and DIPS.
Posted by: scribbletone | November 16, 2009 at 11:37 AM
Ditto stlcards.
How about Manny Ramirez, a career .411 OBP has a .363 the lowest since his rookie year? 57 Walks for a guy who has averaged 80-100 since his rookie year? He missed 50 plus games last year and had 71 walks.
Posted by: go sox | November 16, 2009 at 11:39 AM
Counsell? Isn't he like 40?
Posted by: Kinsm | November 16, 2009 at 11:48 AM
Always fun to hear Evan Gran't ridiculous trade scenarios...
Edwin Jackson for Chris Davis, Kasey Kiker, and Brandon McCarthy.
He goes on to state that if that's not enough, the Rangers NEED to deal Justin Smoak + premium pitching prospect if they want to contend.
Posted by: vtadave | November 16, 2009 at 11:50 AM
Why do we care what teams he had marginal players assigned to? And look at the AVG/OBP/SLG, not the playing time projection. This is about as far from voodoo as projections get.
Posted by: Tim Dierkes | November 16, 2009 at 11:52 AM
Unless you're a superstar, it sure does suck to be a Type A FA.
Betancourt will have virtually no option other than to accept arbitration if it's offered. Who's gonna give up those picks for a non-closing reliever?
Posted by: Timotheus | November 16, 2009 at 11:59 AM
People were making COMMENTS in the COMMENT SECTION of the predictions provided! Obviously no one is going to take them seriously if they even take the time to click the link! They were just plain horrible
Posted by: stlcards16 | November 16, 2009 at 12:02 PM
This day seems to be filled with moronic trade proposals. Phillips to the Jays to play 3B? When there are plenty of free agent 3B available while Phillips isn't even a 3B? Then some idiot said Minaya should at least try and trade for Votto. Yes, and we should build a time machine, clone Ted Williams, and bring him back to play as well.
Posted by: MetsvilleSlugger | November 16, 2009 at 12:05 PM
http://www.hardballtimes.com/main/article/so-how-did-tht-projections-do/
http://www.baseballprospectus.com/unfiltered/?p=564
These are some articles on the accuracy of these projection systems, CHONE seems to be a pretty good one (though usually conservative) especially for hitters.
Posted by: CubFanRaysaddict | November 16, 2009 at 12:10 PM
"Jon Paul Morosi of FOX Sports believes it's a three-horse race for Matt Holliday: the Red Sox, Yankees, and Angels. "
How big does the Yankees' payroll have to get before baseball imposes a real payroll cap to maintain at least the fiction of competitive balance? $400 million? $1 billion?
Posted by: Ron Edwards | November 16, 2009 at 12:13 PM
David Ortiz is going to reach 30 HR, 100 RBI, and reach .250?
That's some powerful stuff they are smoking. Sign me up.
Posted by: UGotRPK3113 | November 16, 2009 at 10:51 AM
Uhm....consider that Papi had a bad April and a HORRIBLE May, and still hit .238 with 28 homers and 99 RBI's, how is that so hard to believe? It's possible. It's also possible for his numbers to turn into V-Teks. Anything is possible and that's what's great about baseball there are so many tangibles.
Posted by: turnthe2 | November 16, 2009 at 12:20 PM
Wow, Andre Either loses 10 homeruns and 27 RBI's? Matt Kemp drops 6 homeruns and 20 RBI's? Crystal ball? More like a Magic Eight Ball.
Posted by: Richamania | November 16, 2009 at 12:21 PM
Hey Ron !.
The Yanks have money coming off the books. and there projected salary cap should be lower than last years.
Do me a favor and stop crying about payroll. Tell your owner instead of blowing the revenue he makes and the Yankees give him on his Mistress's and Cars and instead put it back into the team
In stead of a cap. There should be a ceiling. Teams HAVE TO SPEND MONEY!. if they can't they shouldn't exist. PERIOD
Posted by: Mike | November 16, 2009 at 12:21 PM
The Red Sox are not after Holliday. Theo and the owners are done with Borass. He will go to the highest bidder(yankees). Borass mouthpieces always floating the idea of the Red Sox being involved so they can drive his price up.
Posted by: terry180 | November 16, 2009 at 12:27 PM
"Jon Paul Morosi of FOX Sports believes it's a three-horse race for Matt Holliday: the Red Sox, Yankees, and Angels"
oh yeah?? the Red Sox who are hoping to resign Bay, the yankees who had the best offense last year and wont commit on another long-term contract and the angels who have a pretty good OF of rivera, hunter and abreu.
the battle will be between the cards and the mets to get holliday.
Posted by: metsfan08 | November 16, 2009 at 12:27 PM
i agree Metsfan08. The Yankees don't want Holliday!.
Boras wants the Yanks to jump in.. but we don't need or want him.
He belongs on the Mets , or Sox
Posted by: Mike | November 16, 2009 at 12:29 PM
“Can we get 2009 CHONE published so we can see what that looked like?”
The past 3 years archives are linked on that page.
For Bostons 2009 projections
Nearly dead on’s
.311/.376/.464/.840 – Pedroia – was .296/.371/.447/.819
.272/.335/.434/.769 – Lowell – was .290/.337/.474/.811
.228/.326/.381/.707 – Varitek – was .209/.313/.390/.703
.297/.354/.425/.779 – Ellsbury – was .301/.355/.415/.770
fairly close
.267/.383/.448/.831 – Bay – was .267/.384/.537/.921 (Avg and OBP perfect, just Slg off)
Off on
.286/.388/.474/.862 – Youk – was .305/.413/.548/.961
.267/.364/.472/.836 – Drew – was .279/.392/.522/.914
.284/.401/.555/.956 – Ortiz – was .238/.332/.462/.794
And possibly most impressive. The combined real total of those 8 players were .276/.364/.474/.838. The combined projection total over their real PA/AB amounts ends up at .280/.368/.459/.827. They seem to have pegged the Red Sox starters really well overall – within a combined .004/.004/.015 over their real PA/AB amounts.
Posted by: SuzysMan | November 16, 2009 at 01:14 PM
What in the world are these CHONE projections?!?!?!
They project Aramis Ramirez to play 119 games (he dislocated a shoulder, it's not an annually chronic thing!).
However, they have 17 others playing 120 games, including Jake Fox's statuesque glove, Bobby Scales, Sam Fuld, and about 8 guys I've never heard of.
Point is, 8 defensive spots other than pitcher is 1296 defensive games. 17 defensive players in 120 games is 2040 games. Those 17 players (that don't include Soto, Sori, or Rammy) total the whole season, PLUS almost 750 pinch hitters/DHs and/or defensive replacements!
WHAT IN THE WORLD?!
Posted by: cubs223425 | November 16, 2009 at 01:43 PM
"They project Aramis Ramirez to play 119 games (he dislocated a shoulder, it's not an annually chronic thing!)."
OMG, no! You mean they project an Aramis Ramirez who averaged 121 Games the last three years to get 119 Games in 2010? How dare they!
Come on man, do you know nothing about projections? It is impossible to predict playing time. Everyday guys usually get around their recent in-majors average while scrubs are given a scrubs worth of AB to establish a baseline of "if given a job, expect about this production". The projections are in no way set up to mean "the Cubs will play all these people and get this production form them"; so taking it as such is akin to complaining your TV isnt heating your leftover pizza.
Posted by: SuzysMan | November 16, 2009 at 02:04 PM
Suzysman,
Thanks for the sox eval and 2009 link alert
Posted by: go sox | November 16, 2009 at 02:15 PM
morosi's post is 100% wrong, the yankees have just said they aren't going to sign Holliday, and the angels are focusing on resigning figgins and lackey, while the redsox only get involved if bay goes elsewhere
Posted by: johan is GOD | November 16, 2009 at 03:21 PM
aap212:
That's my point. I could really see Reyes having 25+ triples cause anybody can turn a hit in the gap into a triple and Reyes will have a field day with his speed.
Posted by: diehardmets | November 16, 2009 at 03:21 PM
Oh yeah. Holliday will be a Met you can take it to the bank.
Thogh dont quote me with Omar around
Posted by: diehardmets | November 16, 2009 at 03:24 PM
Billy Butler is the Royals player of the year??? What about Zack Greinke?????
Posted by: JOEYB33 | November 16, 2009 at 03:24 PM
Mike,
As much as I disagreed with you the other day, you hit it on the head today (although I think you mean floor, not ceiling).
Teams should have a minimum payroll; I do think there should also be a cap but I don't mind a relatively high cap.
My problem isn't with the team's payrolls - it's with the agents' manipulations of player value.
Posted by: borninmainelivinginexile | November 16, 2009 at 03:26 PM
JOEYB33- The Royals give out a (position) player of the year AND a pitcher of the year award.
And while we're on Butler... I hope the Royals have some caution with him. I like the kid and I think he could be great, but I'm worried he might be the next Bob Hamelin or Ken Harvey. Let him play another full season and see if he can repeat his success from 2009, then let's talk about locking him up.
Posted by: bustedflush | November 16, 2009 at 03:28 PM
"Billy Butler is the Royals player of the year??? What about Zack Greinke?????"
I'm pretty sure he's locked up Pitcher of the Year
Posted by: twentyfivemanroster | November 16, 2009 at 03:29 PM
And while we're on Butler... I hope the Royals have some caution with him. I like the kid and I think he could be great, but I'm worried he might be the next Bob Hamelin or Ken Harvey. Let him play another full season and see if he can repeat his success from 2009, then let's talk about locking him up.
Posted by: bustedflush | November 16, 2009 at 03:28 PM
Bustedflush I think you are going to get your wish. Whether it is good or bad, the Royals are planning on waiting with Butler until after 2010. He could have another big season and it could cost them more in the end, but Moore has said that once Guillen's salary is off the books after this season he can look at buying out Butler's arb years.
And I agree with you that is the way to go with him.
Posted by: bigscott | November 16, 2009 at 04:04 PM
"Counsell? Isn't he like 40?"
Posted by: Kinsm | November 16, 2009 at 11:48 AM
He's 39. He also hit .285 with 4 homers and 39 RBIs with a .357 OBP, his best offensive season since 2005. He had a UZR of 5.0 in 50 games at Second Base, a UZR of 1.4 in 43 games at Third Base, and a UZR of -0.1 in 27 games at Shortstop this season. He plays quality defense at three infield positions, and has a respectable bat.
I'm surprised there isn't more than 12 teams interested in him. Especially considering that he did what he did last season being paid only 1 million dollars.
Posted by: Sage | November 16, 2009 at 04:12 PM
Any chance that Butler could get dealt? I think Texas and KC could match up pretty well on a deal.
Posted by: Sherman McCoy | November 16, 2009 at 04:18 PM
cubs fan or not, give the article by 'desipio' a read... hilarious and very accurate
Posted by: rootman1010 | November 16, 2009 at 04:24 PM
Finally a good post about WAR over at Fangraphs. I'm sick of people using those numbers as some sort of benchmark for what a player should earn via FA.
Posted by: bjsguess | November 16, 2009 at 04:27 PM
CHONE is a joke
all of Pablo Sandoveezy's projections will be doubled, except for maybe average...but who knows he might just hit .600
Posted by: Leland11 | November 16, 2009 at 04:53 PM
Any chance that Butler could get dealt? I think Texas and KC could match up pretty well on a deal.
Posted by: Sherman McCoy | November 16, 2009 at 04:18 PM
Sherman, I am by no means the final word on this, but living near KC I think Greinke and Butler are the only untouchables this offseason. Now I'm sure if they get blowed away with a deal Butler could get moved, because while he is a great hitter, and played OK at 1B, he is really a DH.
On that note, it wouldn't surprise me if Soria was actually quietly being shopped because I don't think he is untouchable.
Posted by: bigscott | November 16, 2009 at 04:58 PM
"I'm surprised there isn't more than 12 teams interested in him. Especially considering that he did what he did last season being paid only 1 million dollars."
The reason comes in this:
Orlando Hudson
Orlando Cabrera
Marcos Scutaro
Mark DeRosa
Felipe Lopez
Jamey Carroll
Ronnie Belliard
Eric Brunlett
Alex Cora
Adam Kennedy
Bobby Crosby
Adam Everett
John McDonald
Omar Vizquel
Craig Counsell
The market for utility infielders is extremely deep. A couple off the top will sign as a starter, but there will still be plenty of bench guys to go around. It isnt unrealistically to expect some teams to stay away from the 39 year old and instead chase one of the other 10+ or so options out there.
Posted by: SuzysMan | November 16, 2009 at 05:55 PM
As a Cubs Fan, I would take Craig Counsell's 39 years and $1 million salary over Aaron Miles any day of the week. In fact, for how cheap you could probably sign him Hendry should just release Miles and make Counsell an offer.
Posted by: gcheezpuff | November 16, 2009 at 06:57 PM
SuzysMan, nice list. However, I honestly don't think that any of those players (with the exceptions of Alex Cora and possibly Bobby Crosby) will give the type of value that Counsell does for around only $1 million per year. The majority of the people on that list will probably gather more than that. Counsell is cheap, a great clubhouse guy, and a great player. How can you afford to not be interested in him?
Rumors around that Boston is looking at him? That could prove interesting. He could do well in Boston. He'd love that short fence out in right. He could actually have 9 or 10 homers with that field.
Posted by: Sage | November 16, 2009 at 06:57 PM
"He'd love that short fence out in right. He could actually have 9 or 10 homers with that field."
He'd have to be a marksman to take advantage of the "short fence," since it's only 302 feet directly down the line. To the left of the pole, it's one of the deepest rightfields in baseball.
Posted by: DunkinDonuts | November 16, 2009 at 07:04 PM
DunkinDonuts, trust me. Craig Counsell would do really well that. He's almost a dead pull hitter, and usually hits balls with enough lift on them to make it over that fence.
Posted by: Sage | November 16, 2009 at 07:51 PM
"As a Cubs Fan, I would take Craig Counsell's 39 years and $1 million salary over Aaron Miles any day of the week. In fact, for how cheap you could probably sign him Hendry should just release Miles and make Counsell an offer."
Pardon the french, but - oh F* yeah!
I would rather watch 47 year old Shawon Dunston as our utility infielder then sit through another season of Miles. But alas, Hendry and his man-crushes means we will both be disappointed in 2010. Elmer Fudd is already out there defending Miles and telling us about the bounce back he should see :(
Posted by: SuzysMan | November 16, 2009 at 08:03 PM
According to his spray chart on MLB.com for 2009, he does not even remotely resemble a dead-pull hitter, and rarely goes down-the-line. Unfortunately, that is exactly what he'd have to do, otherwise he's looking at a 380-foot right-field fence.
Counsell brings several skills to the table. The ability to use the Pesky Pole for target practice does not project to be one of them, no matter what your heart tells you.
Posted by: DunkinDonuts | November 16, 2009 at 08:16 PM
"The Red Sox are not after Holliday. Theo and the owners are done with Borass. He will go to the highest bidder(yankees). Borass mouthpieces always floating the idea of the Red Sox being involved so they can drive his price up."
Where has there been a credible source in the Yankees organization that said "We're really looking into Matt Holliday" ? Speculation is great and is much encouraged, but some people on this site are acting like the Yankees are making the contract as we speak! There are no indications that the Yankees are any closer to inking Holliday than the Red Sox, Angels, Pirates, or the San Francisco 49ers as a towel boy!
And wouldn't you think that Boras wanted to include the Yankees as "big players" to try to drive the price up for other teams that want his services?
Posted by: Agent | November 16, 2009 at 08:35 PM
Agent,
In strictly logical terms, your post makes sense.
But if last offseason is any indication, Boras and other agents don't need to use the Yankees to drive up the price, because the Yankees will simply take whatever the market value for a player's services seems to be and add two or three years and $30-40M to avoid the hassle of negotiations.
Posted by: DunkinDonuts | November 16, 2009 at 08:42 PM
Agent,
In strictly logical terms, your post makes sense.
But if last offseason is any indication, Boras and other agents don't need to use the Yankees to drive up the price, because the Yankees will simply take whatever the market value for a player's services seems to be and add two or three years and $30-40M to avoid the hassle of negotiations.
Posted by: DunkinDonuts | November 16, 2009 at 08:42 PM
Yeah, they did that with those players because those were holes they desperately needed to fill. This year, they'll be cutting costs again by unloading contracts off the books and still adding players. I think if anything, if Granderson and Jackson don't cost too much, you could see a trade for them, and then a signing of Sheets or Harden and that would be it, and their payroll will be below $200 million.
Posted by: O'Neill Fan | November 16, 2009 at 08:52 PM
the Angels need to sign Holliday and then go about the trade route for another pitcher.
Any ideas of possible pitchers? What kind of package might it take?
Posted by: Light Up the Halo | November 16, 2009 at 09:00 PM
DunkinDonuts, does his chart actually say that? Well, I stand corrected then. Having watched him the whole season as a Brewers fan, though, most of his hits that I remember were down the right field line. I suppose maybe just his important hits have been down the right field line.
But anyway, if he hits anything into right field down the line, he will almost be guaranteed a triple. He may be old, but he still has some wheels.
All that said, all of his options for teams considered, I sincerely hope that the Brewers get on their horse and re-sign Craig as quick as possible so as to let us continue utilizing his complete and total awesomeness.
Posted by: Sage | November 16, 2009 at 11:25 PM
On that note, it wouldn't surprise me if Soria was actually quietly being shopped because I don't think he is untouchable.
They should shop Soria, whats the point of haveing a great closer when they cant even get him in the game.
Posted by: pcain_78 | November 17, 2009 at 10:14 AM
CHONE projections say the Cubs will get 2160 at bats out of the catcher position. That's asinine.
Posted by: Mundek420 | November 18, 2009 at 01:55 PM
so wat r they sayin about the cubs
r they sayin they r not reliable and consistent
i think tht the cubs could get granderson if the right players r involved
i also think tht tht is a way to possibly get rid of bradly
if not we could send him to tampa which is one of the teams who r willin to take him
anothe team for bradley is the rangers
lets get rid of him and get granderson
Posted by: go cubs go | November 19, 2009 at 09:17 AM