MLB Rumors - MLB Trade Rumors
Subscribe to MLB Trade Rumors using RSS
Home     Contact     About     Advertise     Archives     Widget     Twitter      RSS Usage

« Roy Halladay Rumors: Thursday | Main | Olney On Ausmus, Carroll, Prior, Penny »

Phillies' Third Base Targets

The Phillies have Placido Polanco, Mark DeRosa, and Adrian Beltre on their third base wish list, according to sources speaking to Jim Salisbury of the Philadelphia Inquirer.  Salisbury adds that Chone Figgins and Miguel Tejada are also of interest, but to a lesser degree.

Phils GM Ruben Amaro Jr. told Salisbury he'd "rather do something early," but doesn't see that happening.  DeRosa signed early with the Cubs three years ago, specifically on November 14th.  Salisbury debates the merits of Polanco, DeRosa, and Beltre in his column.  Which do you prefer?  By the way, ESPN's Jayson Stark finds Figgins an unrealistic fit for the Phillies for a variety of reasons.

In other Phillies news, Salisbury notes Korean reports suggesting Chan Ho Park wants to start in 2010.  Amaro has heard differently from Park's agent.  Starting was a big factor in Park's decision to sign with the Phillies a year ago.


Comments

Beltre still makes the most sense, and I'd only bring on Polanco or DeRosa as bench insurance in a perfect world.

Of course, that won't happen. We'll probably end up bringing back Feliz or signing Melvin Mora or some other dumb move.

Polanco already failed here.

Seriously? Polanco didn't fail as a Phillie. He was expendable because of the emergence of Chase Utley.

PLEASE no Polanco or Mora. Please... Sign DeRosa cheaply for a bench bat and sign Beltre for the starting hot corner.

I'd take Polanco before I took DeRosa personally. Placido has a knack for having clutch ABs, and DeRosa really feel off after the trade to the Cardinals.

I really like the idea of bring Polanco back, as well as signing Derosa. I would rather have the more versatile player (Derosa) coming off the bench to be able to spell the starters, which is a real need for this team. However I think Derosa will land a starting job somewhere. If we don't resign Feliz I'd be satisfied with Polanco at 3rd

"So he failed." - I guess if you call "failed" hitting .316/.376/.418 prior to being traded, then yeah, guess he failed.

"Polanco already failed here."
Now that's just plain stupid.
Polanco led BOTH leagues in batting in 2005, but didn't have enough plate appearances in either league to qualify for the batting title.
The guy is a stud. He's the best contact hitter in the game, the toughest to strike out in most seasons, moves a runner better than anyone, hit .330 with runners on base every year, and is the steadiest defender you can find. He doesn't add a lot of BB's to his hit total, and he isn't Babe Ruth, but he's a solid ball player, and would be a big time upgrade over Feliz.
If the Phils do sign Polanco, I hope they do so before December 1st, because the Tigers have a GM that is dumb enough to not offer him arbitration, for fear that he'd have to pay him a reasonable wage. Polanco is a Type A free agent, and the Tigers could use the draft pick that our GM would rather leave on the table.

I have no idea why the Phils wouldn't kill three birds with one stone...

Third base has been a black hole since Rolen for them... Signing Figgins, not only, gets them a replacement for Rollins at the leadoff spot, but it gets them a better table setter at the top of the lineup... It allows Rollins to drop down to 7th in the order where he would have less pressure... If Rollins is leading off next season, it's not going to be pretty... It also gets them an adequate replacement for Pedro Feliz glovewise... I just see this being too perfect a fit for the Phils to pass up on it...

"I have no idea why the Phils wouldn't kill three birds with one stone..."

It's all about supply and demand allaboutthe phils.. 4-5 teams will be looking at Figgins and can see a bidding war looming, no idea why, he is going to be 32YO next year, wanting 4+ years and his game is speed, which is going to be just how good about year 3 onwards of that deal? It just seems far safer to go with the best defensive third basemen in the game, Adrian Beltre, who should find his long lost power stroke in Philly and be looking for 2-3 years (and cheaper) than Figgins.

Not a fan of a Polanco signing. He's a Type A and not at all the kind of guy you waste a draft pick on signing.

Sorry, allaboutthephils, I don't see Rollins going anywhere in the lineup other than leadoff. I still think Beltre makes the most sense and will still emerge as the leading candidate of the bunch.

I'm still hoping DD will offer Polanco arbitration and he takes it. Nothing like taking out your second best batter for a total rookie in an already struggling lineup.

Polanco isn't what the Phils need. They should definitely take Beltre over Figgins. Look at what Ibanez did after coming over from Seattle. Who's to say Beltre wouldn't find similar success. The Phillies game is big home runs with a little speed mixed in. Stick to it. Plus the guy plays a wicked 3B.

Polanco isn't what the Phils need. They should definitely take Beltre over Figgins. Look at what Ibanez did after coming over from Seattle. Who's to say Beltre wouldn't find similar success. The Phillies game is big home runs with a little speed mixed in. Stick to it. Plus the guy plays a wicked 3B.

Posted by: BaseballFan0707 | November 12, 2009 at 01:11 PM"

They need Polanco more than Beltre. Victorino can move to lead off, Polanco in the 2 hole. Rollins hitting 7th..

Well I thought it would be somewhat obvious Beltre would be the best scenario, I was more debating the merits between DeRosa-Polanco as a backup option.

@vtadave
Those are some pretty nice stats. But how many years ago was that? Has your mom brought your lunch to you down in the basement yet?

I do not understand how Chone Figgins would not fit here? He is the best all around third baseman available. Adding him would arguably give the Phillies the best infield in baseball.

Also, please do not bring Tejada here. We do not need another "roider" here.

"@vtadave
Those are some pretty nice stats. But how many years ago was that? Has your mom brought your lunch to you down in the basement yet?

Posted by: Harangody's hang time | November 12, 2009 at 01:22 PM"

Mad? because you can't take 2 seconds and look up some stats?

Polanco has done nothing but hit and play a damn good Defense since leaving Philly.

Assuming Beltre costs less, he's the best fit for the Phillies. He's a better defender than Figgins, which is especially important with 3 and maybe 4 LHP's in the rotation, and he's a year younger. He's also been playing in one of the worst hitter's parks.

They need Polanco more than Beltre. Victorino can move to lead off, Polanco in the 2 hole. Rollins hitting 7th..


Posted by: 661dodgerblue | November 12, 2009 at 01:17 PM

Finally someone else who realizes that Rollins should slide to the 7 hole with Victorino leading off. Victorino would have a .370 OBP easy if he didn't constantly come up to the plate with 1 out and get antsy trying to make up for Rollins not getting on base.

I agree Beltre signing needs to get done. He'll get back to hitting 30+ bombs in Philly, plays better defense than Pedro and he's RH and hits lefties well. We don't need another switch hitter or LH bat. This is what the lineup should look like next year

Victorino
Utley
Werth
Howard
Beltre
Ibanez
Rollins
Ruiz

Makes for a much better balance than they had last year and your 1-3 hitters all will have high OBPs and see alot of pitches.

DeRosa hits appreciably better against Lefties (.299/.386/.490 over his career), so signing him could be a low-cost way to address what was exposed as a big weakness for the Phils in the World Series. of course, fully taking advantage of this might require more creativity with the lineup than Charlie likes. But really, pretty much anyone would be an improvement offensively over Pete Happy, the Automatic Out.

i love it. finally some more fans on board with beltre. i do think his offensive power will be resurrected in philly. the availability of 3base options for the phils should be a good bargaining chip for them and bring down beltre's price. also his injury last season might make some teams hesitant to go out and pay for him. the seattle-to-philly connection has already been made, but its a great point. i could see a guy like beltre being REAL productive in this lineup! --dont know about that exact order jman1984--but def those players would present problems for opposing pitchers. j roll could start off on fire, high obp, scoring runs, and stay in the number 1 spot.

figgins will be overpaid somewhere, since he is generally considered the top 3rd base FA. i hope the phils do not fall into a bidding war for this guy. he would definitely impact the offense, possibly in more ways than beltre, but i do not think he is going to be worth the contract he will probably get.

derosa/polanco, although mid-30s, will probably find starting jobs somewhere. derosa as the 'ultimate backup utility guy' sounds all fine and good, but he is good enough to start on a mediocre team--not backup players on the phils. i wouldnt mind gettin polanco to play 3rd, but only if ruben is really, really concerned about finances for the offseason. 1-2 years cheap contract with polanco, who has better defense than feliz and beltre, would allow finances towards pitching......

bottom line--i really hope beltre can come in at a multiyear deal. get it done ruben

"I do not understand how Chone Figgins would not fit here? He is the best all around third baseman available. Adding him would arguably give the Phillies the best infield in baseball."


could easily argue the same thing for beltre. i would. 5 gold gloves on 1 side of the infield...pretty good. finally some power/pop at the 3rd base side, to couple with the power of howard. u watch--beltre's "average" numbers were playin at huge safeco field--not friendly to R handed batters.

thephrontiersman, worldchamps08, johns, hollywoodhamels, baseballfan0707, HAK, jman1984---u guys got it right, good work.

Figgins is too expensive, though he'd be great.

Beltre would be great if he can be had for a decent number.

I'd have NO problem with Polanco coming back. He's a gamer, perfect in the clubhouse, and left Philly on good terms. Beltre may bring more pop, but there's nothing wrong with adding some contact-hitting with all the Phils' sluggers. Quite a few fans (including myself) wanted to see him move to 3rd when Utley emerged.

In this market, Beltre and Figgins are the two top dogs and they aren't going to be separated by much salary wise...

It's comparable to last years outfield market... Too many outfielders for too little positions available... What happened ??? The Phillies scored Ibanez for 3 yrs @ 30 MM and he was the best available outfielder... If Figgins is available, you take him and run... He will be available for something close to that...

Beltre had one decent season and it was skeptical to say the least...

The Phillies do not have a true leadoff hitter... Repeat, the Phillies do not have a true leadoff hitter... No one on the Phillies gets on base enough to set the table the right way and that's why they lost the world series...

If you slot Victorino leadoff ( the best option as of now ) you are staring at a OBP that is hovering around .350... Not high enough... Figgins is around .400 ... No one on this team can come close to that...

Utley's OBP last year .397. Werth's was .373. But you're not allowed to let "sluggers" bat higher than 3rd in the lineup, because it makes Tim McCarver cry.

In 449 at-bats last year, over 111 games, Adrian Beltre batted a whopping .265, had an OBP of .304, slugged an anemic .379, had 8 homers and 44 rbis...

In a contract year, that's pretty horrible...

Well below Pedro Feliz's production and you want to give him more money and a multi-year deal ???

Adrian, for as great as he has been touted defensively, had the 3rd worst zone rating and fielding percentage, not just in the AL, but in baseball for 3rd baseman...

allaboutthephils--

beltre played 111 games due to injury--only the first time since his rookie season he didnt play in 130 games. the same cannot be said for pedro feliz. u cant compare 2009 season cause pedro did play in more games by about 45.

beltres career batting average, on base percentage, and slugging percentage all range 20 to 30 points higher than pedro feliz.

allaboutthephils, Beltre played injured last year. Look at his body of work, not one season. He's been a consistently good to great fielder who hits for power despite playing all of his home games in a bad (Dodger Stadium) or horrible (Safeco) hitter's park. He's also a year younger than Figgins and, in part because of the seasons that they each produced last year, he should come cheaper and probably for fewer years.

and jimmy rollins could easily start off next season on fire. he had a bad season, but he's got the tools, makeup and work ethic to come out in 2010 and get his obp back to where it should be. sure if he doesnt get it goin move him down and let victorino start--charlie did that this year so he ll do it again.

dont get me wrong--figgins would be a great addition to any offense because of his obp. thats obvious. however, his game is predicated on speed. At 32 years old, im not real excited about seein him in a 5yr 50 mil deal. As he leads the FA market for 3basemen, that is the deal he probably will get.

Adrian, for as great as he has been touted defensively, had the 3rd worst zone rating and fielding percentage, not just in the AL, but in baseball for 3rd baseman...

Posted by: allabouthephils | November 12, 2009 at 04:02 PM

In 2009, despite playing injured, Beltre was 3rd among MLB 3B's in range factor and he led MLB 3B's in UZR/150, which is one of the, if not the, most widely accepted fielding metrics. However, I will admit that I'm not sure how to explain the difference between ZR and UZR or UZR/150.

over the next, say, 3 years, adrian beltre has a greater potential to be hittin more homeruns and drivin in rbi than figgins or feliz. the phillies were the highest scoring offense last year, so even though jimmy could/should have done much better, they still were the best offensive team with his struggles. add beltres power bat for the right price and you will get incredible production out of the 6-7 hole.

dont get me wrong--figgins would be a great addition to any offense because of his obp. thats obvious. however, his game is predicated on speed. At 32 years old, im not real excited about seein him in a 5yr 50 mil deal. As he leads the FA market for 3basemen, that is the deal he probably will get.


Very little chance Figgins gets that much... There are too many options out there for 3rd baseman... We saw this last year for outfielders... What happened to Bobby Abreu, Pat Burrell and Adam Dunn ??? I'm not saying that Figgins will end up like those guys, but Ibanez and Bradley didn't get max value for their seasons because GMs could have settled for other, cheaper options... Same with this market on third baseman...

After Ibanez and Bradley got 3@30MM below market deals... The rest were left to scrounge for whatever other team would sign them... It's looking like that might happen this year...

Figgins will not get more than 4 years, if he gets that... It will probably be 3@30 or 33...

The Phillies do not have a true leadoff hitter... Repeat, the Phillies do not have a true leadoff hitter... No one on the Phillies gets on base enough to set the table the right way and that's why they lost the world series...

If you slot Victorino leadoff ( the best option as of now ) you are staring at a OBP that is hovering around .350... Not high enough... Figgins is around .400 ... No one on this team can come close to that...

Posted by: allabouthephils | November 12, 2009 at 03:48 PM

Figgins only topped a .352 OBP 3 times in his career, and one of those years was skewered because he had a .330 BA. He has also struck out over 100 times in 3 seasons, including this year (just what the Phillies need, more strikeouts). And his 101 walks were 36 more than his previous career high. I don't think he will duplicate that walk total or his .395 OBP next season.

Victorino had a OBP hovering above .360 for much of the middle part of the season. His walk totals and OBP percentages have improved every year since he became a regular. He has never struck out 100 times. When Rollins gets on base, Vic shows tremendous patience and fouls off a lot of pitches making the pitcher work. The problem comes when Rollins does not get on base and Victorino gets over anxious trying to make up for it. Problem solved by batting Vic leadoff. If he was thrust into the leadoff spot I could see him drawing 75-80 walks with an OBP of .370-.380 . The Phillies don't need to overpay for Figgins when Victorino would be more than capable of this role.

Adrian, for as great as he has been touted defensively, had the 3rd worst zone rating and fielding percentage, not just in the AL, but in baseball for 3rd baseman...

Posted by: allabouthephils | November 12, 2009 at 04:02 PM

Well I don't know much about UZR/150, but this years ratings have Beltre at 20.1, which was the highest of all 3B. In comparison, Pedro Feliz who had a .966 FP compared to Beltre's .959, only had a 5 UZR/150. I think FP and errors are misleading when judging a players fielding abilities. Of course UZR isn't perfect either.

over the next, say, 3 years, adrian beltre has a greater potential to be hittin more homeruns and drivin in rbi than figgins or feliz. the phillies were the highest scoring offense last year, so even though jimmy could/should have done much better, they still were the best offensive team with his struggles. add beltres power bat for the right price and you will get incredible production out of the 6-7 hole.


Unfortunately,

Jimmy's time for leading off has come and gone... Vic doesn't get on enough to lead off... Jimmy hasn't had a productive year since 07 and it doesn't look like he is going to rekindle that magic any time soon... His glove is what keeps him in the lineup and makes him worth his weight in gold...

Figgins last three seasons OBP were in 07' .393 08' .367 and 09'.395 ... Strikeouts, in todays baseball, don't matter very much when you get on base 4 out of 10 times...

He scored 114 runs last year, stole 42 bases ( which would only go up with Davy Lopes ), and batted .298... I don't know what else you could ask for ???

“In 2009, despite playing injured, Beltre was 3rd among MLB 3B's in range factor and he led MLB 3B's in UZR/150, which is one of the, if not the, most widely accepted fielding metrics. However, I will admit that I'm not sure how to explain the difference between ZR and UZR or UZR/150.”

UZR is basically Fielding runs over average, where UZR/150 is Fielding Runs over Average if given 150 Games

Now, compare three players

23.7 UZR, 9.7 UZR/150 for Beltre (403 Games)
33.3 UZR, 12.1 UZR/150 for Feliz (440 Games)
21.1 UZR, 10.4 UZR/150 for Figgins (389 Games)


So to everyone pushing Beltre,

Its fine to say you want Beltre over Feliz because of Beltre having a better bat at this point. But don’t say its because he is a superior fielder. He is probably the worst fielder of the 3 at this point in his career (that is only saying that all three are well above average at 3rd but he is the lowest).

And since Figgins is a superior hitter (by roughly 20 Runs, or 2 WAR over the last 3 season at nearly the same amount of PA), he is the superior overall option if price isnt that different. Figgins is just superior in every way, and fits better into a lineup (as where do you really bat a no-OBP fair-SLG hitter? Maybe 7th on a NL club?) You only realistically target Beltre if Figgins is going to cost 5+ million more and you just cant afford it.

Unless the Phils are going to really shake things up and pay the money to get figgins and move rollins out of the leadoff role then the Phils should be putting their resources into Derosa(1) or Polanco(2). By getting one of these guys you can bring Dobbs back into the mix, and he might have the best bat of everyone. Beltre has gotten a lot of mileage out of his 04 season. He is basically a 260ish hitter with 20 HR pop and great D which basically sounds exactly like the guy we just got rid of. For those that say he played at Safeco and CBP will cure all ills please refer back to Feliz. Unless the Phils are banking on an offensive rebound from Beltre and they can get him on the cheap, Derosa and Polanco will leave them much more flexibility both financially and on the field. And in doing so, free up resources for the Bullpen which is where they need to focus. If they fix the bullpen, the Phils can hire any of us to play third and have a great chance at going back to the WS.

why am i the only one that want figgins? if we dont get figgins i want Beltre

all i want for christmas is figgins, beltre, or lowell lol

they can get scutaro to play 3B, but i cant realy see that

sign scutaro or polanco for about a 1yr contract, then in 2011,get atkins or aramis for 4 yrs, or get lowell for 2yrs
any thoughts?

lowell sucks...hes too old and is making 12 mil on the r sox. the phils are not dumb enough to offer him anything close to that. the phils wanted him before feliz when he had some left in the tank...now though, waste of time.

i might be over confident, but i just really think that age 31 beltre can still do some damage. figgins has all-around better characteristics, but im tellin ya, a player depending on speed as his main selling point shouldnt get a 4-5 year deal at age 32. thats what figgins will get with some ballclub. even though beltre's power numbers might be a crapshoot, i would take that as a number 7 hitter in our lineup. i think he has potential--something you can still say about a guy his age--coming back to the NL on a great team. he will be cheaper than figgins and he is worth 8mil a year

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment


Top Stories



Search MLBTR

Lijit Search

MLBTR Features



Recent Posts


MLBTR Mailing List

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Rumors By Team



Monthly Archives


Live Chats


Tuesdays at 2 p.m. CST



Site Map     Contact     About     Advertise     Privacy Policy     Widget     Twitter     Rss Feed


MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com.