MLB Rumors - MLB Trade Rumors
Subscribe to MLB Trade Rumors using RSS
Home     Contact     About     Advertise     Archives     Widget     Twitter      RSS Usage

« Odds & Ends: Uggla, Granderson, Lackey | Main | Phillies' Third Base Targets »

Roy Halladay Rumors: Thursday

The Blue Jays are not resigned to trading ace pitcher Roy Halladay, according to Mark Feinsand of the New York Daily News.  However, Feinsand believes Halladay "wants out of Toronto," and would require an extension as part of waiving his no-trade clause.  As you know, Blue Jays GM Alex Anthopoulos won't rule out trading within the division, opening up Yankees and Red Sox speculation.

SI's Jon Heyman says the Yankees will inquire on Halladay; why wouldn't they?  Heyman believes Halladay favors a deal to an East Coast team and was willing to go to the Yankees or Red Sox last summer.  Since then, the asking price has presumably come down.  Heyman also expects the Mets to check in on Doc, but sees them as a long shot.

Feinsand and Heyman also get into the Yankees' other options to add top-level pitching.  Feinsand says the Yankees "already have their sights set on signing either Halladay or Cliff Lee if both become free agents after next season," but fear Lee might sign an extension with the Phillies.  He says Yankees officials have mixed opinions on whether to pursue John Lackey this winter.


Comments

Sounds like Santana Redux,
Thats a way to drive up the price again.

IF......Halladay allows teams to work out an extension prior to the trade going down would this package seem fair?

Joba Chamberlain, Jesus Montero, Zack McAllister and Brett Gardner?

I have mixed feelings about trading Joba and Montero but Halladay along with CC, AJ, Pettite and Hughes could be magical.

Normally, I would say wait unti he becomes a FA but I just can't see the Sox or Angels passing on him IF he's allowing teams to work an extension prior to the trade.

If either NY or Boston are interested they could easily make a trade for Halliday work.Right now a 3 for 1 would work.Which 3 is the question.

The Yankees just won the World Series. We don't necessarily "need" Doc, and quite frankly, I don't think I could endorse giving up top talent, which is what it would take.

Then again, it IS Roy Halladay.

I hate to say this, but if Boston is leading the pack with their offer, Yankees should get involved, either to land the ace, or drive up the price for the Sawx.

It does make sense for Anthopoulos to act as if the Jays don't really have to trade Halladay so he doesn't get taken advantage of. But I definitely don't see him starting the season with the Jays. I think the Red Sox really have to make this the deal to compete with NY.

hmmm I'd hate to give up montero more than chamberlain

there aren't many hitters with a past like his in the minors, although he does profile as more of a 1B/DH type.

Joba is no guarantee to be a success and has had past arm problems so I'd put him in a halliday deal in a heartbeat.

zmac is good but we have plenty of other young pitchers in the minors

and brett gardner is well replaceable..ajax could probably put up the numbers he's putting up now...don't really know why the blue jays would want him tho

the first 3 would definitely get the conversation going tho...would probably take one more mid-tiered hitting/pitching prospect as gardner has very low potential

Normally, I would say wait unti he becomes a FA but I just can't see the Sox or Angels passing on him IF he's allowing teams to work an extension prior to the trade.

Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | November 12, 2009 at 11:59 AM

You have other guys available for 2011. Namely, Cliff Lee and Brandon Webb.

Why give up a bunch of young prospects when you can just wait another year. (Like signing CC after passing on Santana)

Is Roy Halladay worth that much more than Lee or Webb? Plus, the guy only plays once every 5 days.

Halladay is also the oldest of the aforementioned starters.

I think Montero would be a MUST in a Halladay trade to the Yanks.

i hope the Jays are smart enough to not be interested in Joba IF they want to deal with the Yankees. Joba is overrated! hes not a good long term starter. IF the Jays want to deal with the Yankees i could hope Hughes is someone they are interested in, NOT Joba.

i hope the Jays are smart enough to NOT trade with the Yankees! the Yankees will be mentioned, but hopefully just to drive up the price from other teams.

i feel like whatever trade the Jays do make they are going to get hosed!

Halladay only willing to waive his NTC for an extension & only to an east coast team drives down his price and limits the teams that Jays can work with.

i was hoping something would happen with the Dodgers.

"IF......Halladay allows teams to work out an extension prior to the trade going down would this package seem fair?

Joba Chamberlain, Jesus Montero, Zack McAllister and Brett Gardner?

I have mixed feelings about trading Joba and Montero but Halladay along with CC, AJ, Pettite and Hughes could be magical."

Based on stats, this would be similar to the Red Sox offering Delcarmen, Exposito, Tazawa and Brian Anderson.


Yanks Fan:

I agree.

I have no problem making Joba the centerpiece of a Halladay Trade. (However, I would hold off on including Montero).

We NEED one additional solid SP in our rotation to allow everything else to fall into place for our entire Pitching Staff in 2010:

SP # 1 = CC
SP # 2 = Halladay
SP # 3 = AJ
SP # 4 = Pettite
SP # 5 = Hughes (thru July /135 Innings - then a RP)
Wang (from July - Sept).

Closer = Mariano
8th Inning Set Up = Robertson
Lefty Specialist = Marte

Long Men / Spot Starters = Aceves / Gaudin / Mitre / Kennedy
LH RP's = Coke/Dunn/DeLaRosa
RH RP's = Melancon/Bruney/Garcia

Then, in 2011, if Andy retires, Wang could move up to SP # 4 and Hughes would be ready to give you ~190 Innings as SP # 5

ALL of this could fall into place if the Yankees acquire Roy Halladay.

Seriously? Did you just compare Joba to Delcarmen?

i'd rather save the prospects (I wouldn't mind Montero as the permanent DH when he gets here if his power is for real) than go after Halladay. Sign a cheap starter, like a Jon Garland, or let Gaudin start (did anyone forget how great he was for us when he came over after improving his slider?) along with Hughes. Joba, while not perfect, looked far better coming in in the 7th/8th inning during the postseason. We need to get younger in the near future, and trading for Halladay won't let that happen.

I'm all for it. The only real issue the Yanks had was depth at SP, adding Halladay gives them a postseason rotation of CC, Halladay, AJ, and AP. =] With Hughes as the #5 or keep him as the set up man, and they can then go after another 5th starter.

"Halladay only willing to waive his NTC for an extension & only to an east coast team drives down his price and limits the teams that Jays can work with."

It has never been written or known that Halladay would refuse a trade out west. This is simply speculation on Heyman's part. Halladay has only ever said he wants to go to a winner. That & that alone is Doc's motivation for a trade.

And did you really compare Jesus Montero (#2 Rated Prospect in baseball) to Luis Exposito? Montero may not be a MLB C but his ceiling is MUCH higher than what's projected for Exposito. I would say Austin ROmine is more comparable to Exposito.

"i'd rather save the prospects"

I'm not sure if the Yankees will have a choice in the matter, at least as far as bidding goes.

Anthopoulos has made a terrific play here. Opening up the bidding to the AL East has put all contending teams on high alert.

The Yankees could save the prospects and wait to sign him as a FA...BUT Boston would surely know that this is then their main chance to steal a march on the Yankees. Do they really want to spend the next few years facing up to a Halladay/Sabathia frontline?

So if the Yankees want to make Doc a lock, they move now. And that in turn gets other teams - the Phillies, the Dodgers, the Mets et al - to up the ante too. If you let the Yanks take the Doc, you've just made winning the WS in the next few years an AWFUL lot harder.

Ricciardi's mistake was in ruling OUT the AL East as a destination for Halladay. The Sox and the Yanks didn't have to keep an eye on each other, and everybody else was able to calmly lowball the Jays.

I'm loving the way AA is playing this...I just hope to God that he doesn't end up with the Yanks. The Yanks probably offer the best haul, but years of facing CC/Doc means it's virtually dooming us to a decade of rebuilding.

I have an Idea why don't the Yankees buy Lee and Hallady. Better yet why not throw Lincecum in there too. Better yet lets not even play baseball any more, just non-stop Yankee parades all season long.

You've gotta love the Yankees' hype machine, especially when it comes to players like Joba Chamberlain. He's the Kevin Maas of pitchers. He's never going to be an ace. While he MAY develop into a closer, does that make him a "center piece" in a trade for Roy Halladay? Please! The rest of the AL East salivates at the prospect that Chamberlain and Hughes will be the Yankees' "future". If Cashman was smart he would drive those bums to the Skydome himself.

yea you seem to have forgotten that this is the most innings joba's ever thrown and he tired down in the 2nd half...

he posted a 4.25 era in the AL east in the first half in his first full year of starting...he also had a road era of 4.03 for the season...those are terrible numbers for a first year starter

all that yankee hype man...lets just throw the guy out he's useless no hope at all. Maybe we can get a bag of balls from the muts for him

If the Yankees get involved in the Halladay talks, the Red Sox aren't gonna up their offer just to keep him from NY. You all act like the Red Sox and Yankees always make moves to offset the other team, and over the last few years that just isn't the case. Why would the Red Sox hold a firm offer to Teixeira and allow him to go to NY, but not do the same in this case? As a Red Sox fan, I hope they hold onto their prospects for a run at Felix Hernandez, whenever he does become available (most likely in July or 2011). Halladay is great and all, but I don't see the Red Sox extending him for the years and money he wants. Even if they did, they aren't gonna extend him and Beckett, so if you lose Beckett after this year and gain Halladay, plus all the prospects you gave up, how much better did you become? If the Yankees go out and get Halladay, sure they are gonna win the World Series again. But if the Red Sox aquire Felix in 2011 with the prospects that would have gone to Toronto, and pair him with Lester and Beckett, well the Red Sox would be favorites to win it for 5 years.

"Seriously? Did you just compare Joba to Delcarmen?"

I think he did YFS78 and here we go again.. Another Hot Stove season full of lunacy, already beginning hug my NYY friend?

I would not say that Montero and Expo are really comparable at all though, Montero is primarily a hitting catcher that just could get moved by the time he makes it to the bigs and Exposito is a defense 1st catcher, who is actually good at his position with a rifle for an arm and good makings of a catcher who needs to improve with the bat. Both are totally different.

If there are 2 young pitchers on the staffs to compare, it would be youngsters Bard and Chamberlain. Bard would probably also lose 3-4 MPH off of his FB if he was to start, like Chamberlain, only he washed out in the minors early starting and was converted to relief duty.

You NYY fans grew tired of me (and others) saying this, but I still would like to see him throwing dominant relief work, him and Bard I think would (or could) be the premier fireman in a couple of years, like Gossage and Lee Smith of years ago.

Teixeira is a great player, but he is not comparable to Halladay. Tex is 1B, Halladay is a stud ace pitcher. It goes without saying that a top pitcher is more responsible for winning games than a 1B.

With Felix, you are banking your future on four factors:

1. That he doesn't sign an extension with the Mariners

2. That he doesn't sign for another team as a FA

3. That even if he DOES sign with the Sox that you'd be good enough to beat a Halladay/Sabathia/2011 pitcher Yankees team

4. That he can hold his own in the AL East (something that Halladay has proven for a decade)

Thing is, there really is no gambling with Halladay, especially if he agrees to an extension window. He'll make a very good team into a great team. And he'll be around for at least the next five years. I'd give up what it takes to get him...but we'll see what happens.

"If the Yankees get involved in the Halladay talks, the Red Sox aren't gonna up their offer just to keep him from NY." - brian91388

Well this is good news for everyone else then. I don't care what is said, but every GM prefers to make a deal outside their own division.

All the Joba hate is funny.

"he posted a 4.25 era in the AL east in the first half in his first full year of starting...he also had a road era of 4.03 for the season...those are terrible numbers for a first year starter"

4.25 ERA in the hardest division in baseball in your first year was...bad?

Keep in mind he's only had 1 year in the minors to fine tune his off speed pitches so he's really been learning off major league hitting.

Listen to yourself man & stop drinking the haterade.

Montero, Jackson, Zach Mcallister, Betances.

Take it or leave it AA.

Joba is an odd bird. I've seen him start a game throwing 91-93 and then wind up around 95-96 by the 6th inning. Odd I would say. Joba is much, much more than a 2 pitch pitcher. He simply needs to stop beating himself. Walks and wildness in the strike zone (pitches not in the strikezone but still hitable) are his main problems. Those are issues that HE can fix (meaning it's not a matter of hitters thrashing him). He cuts down on his walks and balls thrown, gains a few ticks on the FB and he becomes a more dominant pitcher. The comparison to Delarmen was a joke. Joba's end of the season was pathetic but he pitched some very good games as well.

I just wish we could get past the whole "Joba to the pen" thing. Let him gain experience and if he fails then you make your move.

I also wish we can get past the "bashing" or minimizing of a prospects potential simply because of the uniform he wears. I mean really, what would I gain by calling Tazawa or Bowden mediocre mlb pitchers? True or not isn't the idea. What does bashing them do for me or my team?

The Mariners should offer Bedard and a prospect for Halladay. That would instantaneously catapult them into contention. Halladay would end up in a Pitchers park. They would definitely get to the post season with him. Of course they'd have to bring back Beltre/Branyan as well.

"Joba is an odd bird. I've seen him start a game throwing 91-93 and then wind up around 95-96 by the 6th inning. Odd I would say"

I thought that Chamberlain threw at the 98-100mph range as a reliever YFS78? Is that incorrect?


" I mean really, what would I gain by calling Tazawa or Bowden mediocre mlb pitchers? True or not isn't the idea. What does bashing them do for me or my team?"

None at all and that was the point of my mentioning another Hot Stove season of lunacy here, just like every year when the Boston, NYY and a few other teams "fans" make the rounds here and post out and our horse sh&$t here.

Gleb: I think he was being sarcatic.

If the Yankees got Halladay I think a lot of people would stop watching baseball... me being one of them.

johns: He did in 07. In 08 he was more around 94-96 as a starter. In 09 he seems to "hold back" early on and sits around 91-93. Later in the game (when he pitches past the 5 inning) he seems to kick it up to around 95-96. That kind of goes against what typical. Usually hard throwers who lack endurance tend to start off throwing hard and usually lose mph as the pitch count increases. But the 98-100 mph Joba hasn't been seen since late 07.

I honestly think he needs a mentor/offseason training from someone like Clemens, minus the use of (cough) the "vitamins" and "supplements". I think he needs to find the balance of being a power pitcher vs a finesse pitcher. So many times he gets ahead of the count and then turns it into a 3-2 count.

Joba and Montero together in a package is just not going to happen for Halladay. If that's what it would take to make a deal, then a deal won't happen. I can see either one being the centerpiece - Montero being included would hurt more - but they you're looking at something like Joba, Jackson, Romine, McAllister or Montero, Kennedy, Jackson, and McAllister.

The only player I'd package them both for would be King Felix, and I still don't think that gets it done for the Mariners. Joba/Montero/Jackson/McAllister would be a solid haul for Seattle though, I think.

The Mariners should offer Bedard and a prospect for Halladay. That would instantaneously catapult them into contention. Halladay would end up in a Pitchers park. They would definitely get to the post season with him. Of course they'd have to bring back Beltre/Branyan as well.

Posted by: Beniitec | November 12, 2009 at 01:15 PM
----------

Bedard isn't even under contract w/ the M's anymore. Also, if they can barely afford to hold on to Felix then how will they be able to acquire Halladay as well?

YFS78

I would offer Montero to no one. Hes one of the best prospects in baseball. Hes only 20 and in AA. Yankees wont trade for no one. I dont think theyll purue Lackey. The only reason theyll be in trade talks with the Blue Jays will be to drive up the price for the Sox and Angels.

YanksFan, you obviously don't know much about the M's financials. They have plenty of money to spend this year. That's why I'm saying it. They have Felix for 2 more years. Buster Olney said it himself yesterday on Twitter, "The Mariners are in a great, great position to take advantage of the current climate in the baseball market."

"The Mariners should offer Bedard and a prospect for Halladay."

I doubt this will happen. But if it does, that prospect would most likely be someone like Ackley. If not, then it would be Alex Liddi and Philippe Aumont.

It actually makes MORE sense for the Jays to trade Halladay in their division, pending they get a reasonable return back. Say they can get a great prospect and one or two other prospects back from the Red Sox/Yankees. Sure it makes the division harder for the Jays to win in during the short-term, but they aren't going to be winning at all during the short-term. However, if you take away a Hughes, or Montero, or Anderson, or whoever from the Red Sox or Yankees, they will most likely have less talent in the future. So not only would the Jays gain better prospects for the future, but either the Red Sox or Yankees would less talented prospects.

Very true. But that's what the M's need in order to get to the post season. And some offense. Hmm, proven All-Star/Cy Young contender vs Prospect... which would you rather have?

@brian91388

While I agree with your post and points, even if the Yankees go out and get Halladay I don't see that move taking them out of throwing $200+ million at King Felix when he becomes a free Agent.

As by that time Andy would most likely have retired, AJ would (I believe) be in the last year of his contract, and Felix would still be what 24/25 years old? So I still think the Yanks will offer the most to Felix when/if he becomes a FA, I think it will ultimately come down to his preference of where he wants to play because there will be no shortage of takers for him.

Just curious, who ranked Montero #2? I would love to see that list, just to see what's up.
I love Montero, btw. Look's like a sure thing to me.

Bedard being Canadian should sweeten the deal. :)

IF......Halladay allows teams to work out an extension prior to the trade going down would this package seem fair?

Joba Chamberlain, Jesus Montero, Zack McAllister and Brett Gardner?

I have mixed feelings about trading Joba and Montero but Halladay along with CC, AJ, Pettite and Hughes could be magical.

Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | November 12, 2009 at 11:57 AM"

Maybe one more piece.. something little.

Joba looks destined for the pen, its not a bad thing however. Hes a shut down reliever.

Montero is one of those true blue chip prospects.

Gardner doesn't help the Jays at all.. McAllister is a good piece.

I think its a little light, not by much.

God, I pray there is a work stoppage in a couple of year so that all this Yankee Red Sox nonsense can stop. Why even bother with a league if they just buy everything.

Fans of big market teams all fear a salary cap, because they know there huge advantage would come to an end.

Oh I see...sorry about that. I obviously don't know much. Bedard is a Free Agent.

I would think the Yankees wouldn't much for a trade. The only big trade they've done this decade was the Arod trade. They'd be more likely to try to sign Halladay after he's traded

I have an Idea why don't the Yankees buy Lee and Hallady. Better yet why not throw Lincecum in there too. Better yet lets not even play baseball any more, just non-stop Yankee parades all season long.

Posted by: xplosive | November 12, 2009 at 12:32 PM

This isn't soccer. You can't buy (out) players from other teams to tender them a contract of your own. Get with the program!

i hate when people say that its unfair what the yankees are doing. dont tell me a team like the nationals couldnt have gotten tex or the brewers honestly couldnt have buckled up 30 mill to get CC. Please.

Who the hell is buying everything? The Pirates can make an offer to trade for Halladay if they want to and Halladay is free to sign with anyone he wants to as well. A salary cap will limit what the Yanks can spend but it certainly won't eliminate the difference between revenue generated in Tampa vs New York. Yanks will always swim at the deep in of the pool and other teams will struggle to draw crowds and retain their players. If the salary cap is problem "a" then problem "b" would be getting rid of franchizes that simply can't support themselves. Problem "c" would be markets that will not be able to maintain a salary floor which will accompany the salary cap. All those are issue I wish people would keep in mind while asking for a salary cap.

Now back to the subject...

Look, I am not knocking on Chamberlain, but he is a dominant reliever in starter's clothing until he goes more than 5 innings.

As a trade chip for a guy like Halladay, he would be valuable to them as a closer I (at least) would think is how they would view him as a potential closer and not as a starter.

Not knocking on him at all, just how teams might view him as maximum value as how he has performed best so far in his young MLB career.

Thanks YFS78, thought he had hit triple digits before on the radar. Somebody hopefully will be able to work with him and get a plan together to pace him through a game plan/stress level that he will find comfortable if he continues as a starter.

And for the record, Ackley can't be traded until next August.

I think the Yanks should do whatever they need to do to win in 2010, they could get a package of prospects together and be ready for the next round of GM meetings. I see this as a great lineup for next year:

Jeter
Pedroia
Longora
A-Rod
Texeira
Mauer
Bay
Ichiro
Hamilton

Oh wait, that's the lineup for the 2009 AL All-Star team...

its not our faults small market teams dont take advantage of revenue sharing. honestly

LOL! I find it funny that some people think it isn't worthwhile to give up prospect for the best pitcher in baseball.

I will guarantee you that whoever you give up, they will never be as good as Halladay. Also, what would the Yankees care, they can just go get Joe Mauer rather than play a rookie catcher like Jesus Montero.

A salary dump for one year of Roy Halladay doesn't get you a top prospect, much less one of the best catching prospects in baseball. There is no guarantee Joe Mauer even makes it to free agency, so planning on that would be ridiculously stupid.

I think Joba maybe the next Mariano Rivera. This is coming from a Red Sox fan. Joba would be a killer closer. I wouldn't want to face him in the ninth inning.

"A salary dump for one year of Roy Halladay doesn't get you a top prospect, much less one of the best catching prospects in baseball. There is no guarantee Joe Mauer even makes it to free agency, so planning on that would be ridiculously stupid."

This is the kind of stupidity that people put out there.....
How the heck is Roy Halladay a salary dump? He's one of the top 5 pitchers in all of baseball (and you can make a very good argument for top 2) and is only being paid $15.75M by a team that can very much afford it. A salary dump is someone like Aaron Harang.

And since people seem to dumb to figure it out, I'm going to post this again (same as other Halladay thread):

It's NOT one year of Halladay.

It's either
a) One year of Halladay PLUS 2 first round draft picks

or

b) Multiple years of Halladay (signs extension)

Too dumb. (How ironic)

monstermash,

Halladay is a salary dump because the Blue Jays are hemmorhaging money and have no chance at winning next year. A salary dump is measured by the team doing the trading, not by a hypothetical team. There is simply no match with the Yankees. Considering that the Yankees have an ace, they aren't trading one of the best catching prospects in the world for Halladay. They just are not that desperate after winning the world series and having the chance to sign him as a free agent after next season without giving up anything.

And do you really think that 2 draft picks from one of the big market teams (likely to be fairly low draft picks because it would be from a good team) have any chance of getting you even a very good catching prospect? 2 draft picks is not enough compensation for the Yankees.

Heck, if Halladay didn't want to play for a contended the Jays would be extending him, not trading him. So how you can call it a salary dump is beyond me.

A salary dump for one year of Roy Halladay doesn't get you a top prospect, much less one of the best catching prospects in baseball. There is no guarantee Joe Mauer even makes it to free agency, so planning on that would be ridiculously stupid.

Posted by: TonyYanksFan | November 12, 2009 at 02:43 PM"

Uh what? Halladay = the best pitching in baseball..

Seems my other comment was deleted because of language.

The Jays aren't "hemmoraghing" money. They have room to add payroll. So I don't get this notion that you think they're dumping Halladay.

If you don't think 2 first round picks plus a top 5 pitcher in all of baseball for a season is worth a top prospect, you really are nuts.

And for the record, if Montero catches 50 games in the bigs I'll be shocked.

"Heck, if Halladay didn't want to play for a contended the Jays would be extending him, not trading him. So how you can call it a salary dump is beyond me."

What are you talking about? All the stories last season were that Halladay didn't want to go. How do you explain them beginning the trade process against his wishes if they don't need to save that money?

hemorrhaging money?

Clearly you don't know anything about, well anything. You don't know anything about the owners - Rogers Communications & you obviously didn't read or hear about the recent quotes from Jays president Paul Beeston in regards to money & the Blue Jays.

Please stop posting about things you have no knowledge of. Thanks.

If I am wrong, why was every story concerning the Blue Jays last summer saying that they needed to cut salary? Why else would a team trade their franchise player who didn't even want to go anywhere until the trade rumor mill got moving?

The team is considering trading the player because he wants to win & he would like to do so sooner rather than later. His time line for winning does not match with the time line of the Blue Jays.

Seems reasonable enough to me.

Clearly you were not reading any news leading up to the decision to trade him because every story made a point of saying that he didn't want to go anywhere until Ricciardi convinced him to open up to it.

He hasn't demanded a trade. That's not what I meant. In fact, he'd much prefer to win WITH the Jays. But the Jays aren't in a position to win in the next couple of years given their current roster makeup, so he wouldn't sign an extension. Therefore, it makes sense to trade him instead of losing him to free agency.

Roy has always said that he would like to win in Toronto. That is his 1st choice & his preference but he has ALSO said if that weren't feasible to win in Toronto - he would be open to other possibilities. That has ALWAYS been his stance.

Ricciardi told Roy that things were going to be difficult in Toronto, in terms of winning a championship & asked him what he would like to do. Roy has been on-board for this - make no mistake about it.

And I don't know about every story where you're from, but the Jays at no point made any mention of cutting payroll. They let Rios go because his contract was worth more than they thought he should be paid. If he was producing, they never would have let him leave.

And the band played on...

Wouldn't be great if they played something different?

While every team is, obviously, wary of the current economic situation in the world, the Jays aren't in dire straights...

They bought out BJ Ryan's contract last season...

Anyone with a pulse would have let Alex Rios walk to another team with that ridiculous contract...

If you can get a return that's worth substantially more than the two prospects you'd get as first round picks in the draft, you have to pull the trigger since you know he isn't resigning... You aren't going to get the haul Riccardi initially asked for in a can't miss top 10 pitching prospect and like 3 other highly projectable prospects, but it should be decent...

They operate under a strict budget as do most teams...

"monstermash,

Halladay is a salary dump because the Blue Jays are hemmorhaging money and have no chance at winning next year. A salary dump is measured by the team doing the trading, not by a hypothetical team. There is simply no match with the Yankees. Considering that the Yankees have an ace, they aren't trading one of the best catching prospects in the world for Halladay. They just are not that desperate after winning the world series and having the chance to sign him as a free agent after next season without giving up anything."

IS this a joke seriously lol. A salary dump is when team A is paying someone a lot of money and team B agrees to take on the contract for nothing of value (maybe a couple real low prospects or something) simply providing salary relief to the other team.

If the Jays were dumping halladay's salary he would have 29 suitors willing to pay for his services for one year and take the draft picks and knowledge from him...

You ppl should be banned from commenting some of this stuff it brings down the integrity of the site. It's exactly why Tim doesn't want to put in forums

Agreed Phils. The Jays will do just fine. They aren't going to destroy anyone's farm system by any means. But a pitcher of Halladay's stature will command a couple of good young prospects & hopefully another useful piece or two.

KING Felix will not be traded for a mere 4 unproven prospects. You will have to give up real, young and proven talent to get him. And still that probably will not be enough, if anyone is untouchable it is he.

Halladay a salary dump?

That is perhaps the most ridiculous thing I have read on this site. Ever. I'm sure the Jays would make him the highest-paid pitcher in baseball IF he wanted to stay.

Rogers will take the payroll to Angels/Sox/Cubs levels WHEN we have the pieces to make a legitimate move into the free agent market.

Moving Roy now is going to break the heart of every Jays fan, but we know it needs to be done.

LOL! I find it funny that some people think it isn't worthwhile to give up prospect for the best pitcher in baseball.

I will guarantee you that whoever you give up, they will never be as good as Halladay. Also, what would the Yankees care, they can just go get Joe Mauer rather than play a rookie catcher like Jesus Montero.

Posted by: Peter D | November 12, 2009 at 02:39 PM


This seems to be the common theme coming from Jays fans regarding Halladay. Unfortunately, it is drastically out of touch with reality. To preface what I am going to say, even though I am a Sox fan, I am hoping that Halladay does NOT end up in Boston, so throw out the homer excuse. Now with that said...

There is no team in baseball, whether it be the Yankees, Sox, Angels, or otherwise that is going to give up their top 2 prospects for 1 year of Hallday. Before you jump on me about an extension, that does not come into play here. While an extension is likely to be required before a trade is completed, the cost of that extension induces negative value in any trade discussions. While Halladay is one of the top 5 pitchers in baseball at this point in time (He is not the best pitcher in baseball), he will be 33 at the beginning of next year. Giving Halladay a 5 year contract takes him to 38. How many non-steroid enhanced power pitchers can you name that have dominated after 35? Not too many...In essence, Halladay is going to require a huge contractual obligation for his past prime years. While any team that gets him is obviously going to be a team competing in the present, Halladay will not be a good value in the last 2 years of whatever contract extension that he signs. Further, requiring a teams TOP 2 prospects equates to 8-10 years of combined cost-controlled, to flight young talent. With the current market baseball operates in, GMs are reluctant to give up young cost-controlled talent for aging veterans. While none of this is what Jays fans want to hear, this is reality. There is a reason the Phillies turned their attention from Halladay to Lee last year. The asking price that Ricciardi had last year was comical at best.

Mets:
Neisse
Tejada
Holt
Evans
Flores

Then sign Wolf and give Halladay an extension and for several years, the Mets have Halladay, Santana, Wolf. Beastliness!!

Thoughts?

I didn't say top 2 prospects. I said A top prospect (plus other lower prospects). And you also seem to have ignored the 2 draft picks the acquiring team gets if they don't extend Halladay (and all this requiring it to waive his NTC is complete nonsense floated by the media because that's what other guys have done).

Oh wait, that wasn't quoting me. I misread it. My bad.

And as for that Mets proposal, the Jays wouldn't do it. They want, as said by AA "quality, not quantity." Otherwise they'll just keep Halladay and hope they improve enough to convince him to re-sign after the year.

"Giving Halladay a 5 year contract takes him to 38. How many non-steroid enhanced power pitchers can you name that have dominated after 35? Not too many"

Maybe not too many...but Halladay will be one of them.

I know Jays fans come on here seemingly asking for a lot, but you need to recognise that there is a fine line between insane fandom and just knowing our player (who we see year in, year out)

None of us are GMs. We are not here to try to sell Halladay to you. Rather, we are trying to tell you just how much awesomeness you will be getting in return.

Your economic arguments are sound, but that's not really what the Halladay sweepstakes are about. Getting Halladay now is about putting a very good team over the top for the next few years. If teams would rather consolidate and economise for the long-term (like the Jays are), then getting Halladay would be the wrong move. If you want to win now - and get past the Yanks - then you go for Halladay in a big way.

Just to clear up the reply to the Mets package (which has some good players), the best ones aren't really close to the bigs, another thing the Jays are supposedly looking for to head the package.

I didn't say top 2 prospects. I said A top prospect (plus other lower prospects). And you also seem to have ignored the 2 draft picks the acquiring team gets if they don't extend Halladay (and all this requiring it to waive his NTC is complete nonsense floated by the media because that's what other guys have done).

Draft picks are nice, but quality prospects are much, much nicer. Also, there is no guarantee that the team which loses Doc gets two picks. If the top pick from the team that signs Doc is protected (highly unlikely) it immediately becomes a sandwich pick and a 2nd round pick at best. If the team that signs Doc signs more than one Type A F/A a situation similar to what happened with TOR this year could arise again. Finally, the likelihood that even a top 1st round draft pick turns out a major league success is MUCH lower than that of a top prospect who has already produced at some level of professional baseball.

Cashman should trade for Doc this time around. I know they just won the Series but you cant go with a 3 man rotation. imagine a 7 game series lined up like this CC Doc AJ CC Doc CC

It's incredible how rookies w/ NO mlb experience are OVERvalued and how 1st and 2nd year players who haven't hit the ground running are UNDERvalued.

Does anyone know the difference between a BLUECHIP pitching prospect and the Joba's and Buccholz' of the world? 10-15 bad starts collectively in 09. Wow...rookie pitchers struggle? Go back in time and look at the first year or two in the careers of Greg Maddux, Tom Glavine, Ramdy Johnson and Roy Halladay. Not at all comparing the talents of Joba or Buchholz to the others, but DAMN if the great ones struggle early in their careers then let's cut these guys some slack too?

Mets:
Neisse
Tejada
Holt
Evans
Flores

Then sign Wolf and give Halladay an extension and for several years, the Mets have Halladay, Santana, Wolf. Beastliness!!

Thoughts?

Posted by: diehardmets | November 12, 2009 at 04:10 PM
---------------

Question? What do you do about your holes @ 1st, 2nd, C, LF and RF? Who do you turn to in replace of Reyes and Beltran as they age or simply don't resign? Seems as if the Mets have a stripped farm already and simply adding Halladay and WOlf is simply putting a bandaid over a gun shot wound. Not being mean or anything, just seems the Mets might want to spread around some of the cash to fix other positions.

The Mets have 0 shot at Halladay. While the Mets have a Fernando Martinez and a few B- type prospects, the Jays want, and rightfully deserve 1 prospect ready to make an immediate impact. There is nothing that the Mets can offer the Jays that would make them jump unless Wright or Reyes was discussed (which I realize would not happen).

we all know the mets will cheap out again and not sign anyone big. if they couldnt come through for the fans after the first year in a new stadium, they never will. Cheaping out on Derek Lowe on 3 yrs 45 for ollie at 36 mill. in the past, they also skipped on vladimir, arod, ichiro, soriano, abreu among many others.

The reason the Jays won't trade Roy Halladay is that other teams see him as merely a top 5 type pitcher, worthy of a top prospect and a couple throw-ins.

Too bad the Jays know better than anyone, that he is the best pitcher of the decade. Will be a top 5 pitcher for the next 3 years at least. Best chance of any pitcher in the league to pitch well as he nears 40. If he does hit free agency, the Jays will likely be the team to offer him the most years, which could be the key to landing him.

If they aren't blown away by the start of free agency, they will make a half-hearted attempt at a 2010 run, and if that fails, they'll give him the best possible shot at a ring by renting him out at the deadline to a surefire contender.

I don't know if they'll take go after Lackey. I think they want to keep options open for Halladay or Hernandez next offseason. A pitcher like Rich Harden or Ben Sheets could be in the Yanks plans on a one year deal.

I also like Curtis Granderson in Pinstripes... he's a near perfect replacement for Johnny Damon.

Curtis Granderson is still under contract and would cost Alot.
Hernandez will never be a Yankee because the price will simply be absurd if he even does hit free agency. Yanks dont want Sheets or Harden because they are too injury prone, and already have Wang, Pettite and two youngsters in Joba and Hughes, and I personally do not want Lackey because i do not like the guy and think hell be in the Burnett neighborhood in terms of cost (absurd)

Question? What do you do about your holes @ 1st, 2nd, C, LF and RF? Who do you turn to in replace of Reyes and Beltran as they age or simply don't resign? Seems as if the Mets have a stripped farm already and simply adding Halladay and WOlf is simply putting a bandaid over a gun shot wound. Not being mean or anything, just seems the Mets might want to spread around some of the cash to fix other positions.

Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | November 12, 2009 at 04:43 PM

First of all, we do not have holes at 2B or RF. Second, both Reyes and Beltran are no where near retiring so them aging is irrelevant. Third, we do not have a "stripped farm" but most of our real talent is still in low A ball so they are still a couple years away. I also do not feel 1B is a hole but that is debatable. As for the band aid over a gunshot wound... you totally lost me. Santana Halladay Wolf Pelfrey Perez/Maine/Niese... exactly how is that hole gaping?

Draft picks are nice, but quality prospects are much, much nicer. Also, there is no guarantee that the team which loses Doc gets two picks. If the top pick from the team that signs Doc is protected (highly unlikely) it immediately becomes a sandwich pick and a 2nd round pick at best. If the team that signs Doc signs more than one Type A F/A a situation similar to what happened with TOR this year could arise again. Finally, the likelihood that even a top 1st round draft pick turns out a major league success is MUCH lower than that of a top prospect who has already produced at some level of professional baseball."

Why must people always point out the value of ONE of the two aspects to the trade relative to whatever the Jays get in return. You get Doc for one year AND two picks. That's far more valuable than a player close to the bigs. And for the record, assuming Halladay pitches like he did this year, he'll once again be at the top of the Elias rankings among eligible FA, so they would get the late 1st and supplemental (under the logical assumption that he'll sign with a team that won).

monstermash: that is stupid logic. you cant say halladay for prospects + 2 picks because that isnt necessarily true. at least in the yanks case, i know not any top prospect would be let go of for 1 year of service for halladay, which means we are giving up top prospects for a long term of halladay, but then the financial burder instantly weighs down the value of the deal in our end. Of course, there is no guarantee any of the prospects us yankees have will ever pan out, same with our mlb ready and mlb serviced prospects such as joba but they are hard to let go of. any way you look at it, it is much more than just a few highly touted prospects for halladay and 2 picks.

If i am the Blue Jays GM I know i have to make fair trades i cannot just go off saying to anyone like the Angels okay the trade is for Roy Halladay for Erick Ayabar,Brandon Wood,Ervin Santanna,and a prospect like he tried to do in the middle of the year he's got to get a trade that they both like or they will have to be in the race to sign Halladay.

dude no. obviously no GM is going to trade their best player just for the sake of trading them; they need to get better in the process. just for the sake of arguing, god forbid the yankees are like 13-50 to start the year and want to trade CCs contract w/1.5 yrs left. Cashman is not gonna be like alright mets; ill take your top 5 scrubs for the best lefty in the game

I don't understand how Yankees fans aren't salivating at the opportunity of acquiring Hallday. Flat out, the guys a top 3 pitcher in MLB all while playing in the best hitting division in baseball. I'm not sure if its overconfidence in our pitching staff, but lets be honest, relying on Pettite to win another WS while apart of a 3 man rotation is a stretch, as is relying on Joba or Hughes to provide solid starting pitching in the playoffs.

At the end of the day, too many fans and GMs are enamored with prospects and "what might become of them" (best exemplified by the red sox fan who claimed they could win the WS in 5 yeas, gimme a break). For every prospect, there's been a guy like Bubba Crosby who absolutely tanked. Give up Joba/Hughes, Montero, Kennedy, and another mid level and pencil Halladay in our rotation and you have an incredibly dominating team (considering we just rolled through the playoffs w/ a 11-4 record without playing a game 7 and every GM in baseball would cringe with the addition of Halladay).

Also, Hallday is worth the long term committment because hes not simply a power pitcher, he can also locate and deceive hitters, so if his fastball tails off in a few years he will still be able to get guys out.

I realize building for the future is important, but relying on unproven prospects while passing up the opportunity to become the favorite for the next few WS and possibly establishing yet another Yankees dynasty seems foolish especially given Cashman's huge payroll to sign free agents and not rely on prospects for success.

At the end of the day, Halladay in pinstripes could ruin baseball for anyone whose not a Yankees fan, and thats extremely enticing for those of us who are.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment


Top Stories



Search MLBTR

Lijit Search

MLBTR Features



Recent Posts


MLBTR Mailing List

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Rumors By Team



Monthly Archives


Live Chats


Tuesdays at 2 p.m. CST



Site Map     Contact     About     Advertise     Privacy Policy     Widget     Twitter     Rss Feed


MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com.