Examining Garrett Jones’ Arbitration Case

In the context of nine-figure player contracts and billion dollar TV deals, $250K isn’t all that much money, yet the Pirates and Garrett Jones went to an arbitration hearing over that sum earlier today. A panel of arbitrators must decide whether the first-time arbitration eligible outfielder/first baseman will earn $2.25MM or $2.5MM in 2012. Let’s take a look at some players who could have figured into the discussion today.

Garrett Jones - Pirates

Recent first-time eligible position players who agreed to one-year deals in the $2.25-2.5MM range would have had the most clout in the hearing room. From the current class of arbitration eligible players, Dexter Fowler ($2.35MM), Nyjer Morgan ($2.35MM) and Seth Smith ($2.415MM) qualify and from last year’s class we have Ian Stewart ($2.29MM), Chase Headley ($2.325MM) and David Murphy ($2.4MM). Those who played long ago, signed at different price points or agreed to extensions as first-time eligible players are generally less relevant. 

The midpoint for Jones’ case sits at $2.375MM — more than Fowler, Morgan, Stewart and Headley obtained their first time through arbitration. The Pirates likely argued that Jones is no better than such players, while SFX would have explained that their client has accomplished more than relevant players below the midpoint. 

In terms of career power numbers, which matter a great deal for position players, SFX had a case. Jones has more career homers than any of the six players above had at parallel points in their careers, and more RBI than everyone but Murphy.

Smith recently obtained a salary above the Jones midpoint, just as Murphy did a year ago. The Pirates may have attempted to show that these players are superior to Jones, but SFX could have countered that Jones is at least as accomplished as Smith and Murphy.

There’s ample room for interpretation — arbitration is both an art and a science. Take Headley, for example. The Pirates could have suggested that Jones’ 2012 salary should stay below the $2.375MM midpoint because he doesn’t measure up to Headley in terms of key stats like average and on-base percentage. SFX could have responded by pointing to Jones’ superior power numbers, both for his career and in his platform season.

In other words, the sides would have highlighted different attributes of the same players in order to make their respective cases. If your head is spinning over the $250K question, you won’t have to wait long for resolution — the verdict should arrive tomorrow.

Photo courtesy Icon SMI. For a look at Jones in relation to teammate Casey McGehee, click here.


Leave a Reply

10 Comments on "Examining Garrett Jones’ Arbitration Case"


3 years 6 months ago

Arb over this? Really?

jesse heiman
3 years 6 months ago

If they are arbitrators from NY could they be biased in case the Yankees get him in a trade?

3 years 6 months ago

If they are biased, they should not be arbitrators at all. Defeats the purpose of the entire profession…

NickinIthaca
3 years 6 months ago

Well put.

3 years 6 months ago

$250,000 is a comfortable house, new car, and tuition to some of us that aren’t professional athletes.

Tony DiQuattro
3 years 6 months ago

It’s this kind of analysis that keeps me coming back to MLBTR.

Also whether it’s anywhere from 2 to 0.5 or less, we’re talking money in terms of houses. THAT’s why they’re going to arbitration.

3 years 6 months ago

Gotta think of this in a big business sense everyone.  For us, they’re going to arbitration over multiple yearly salaries.  But they’re operating in a different world than us.  For them, it’s borderline nothing on the organization’s end.  They could probably hire a few scouts or stadium workers with that 250k, but I seriously doubt they will if they win the case.  You can’t even sign more than one of the more popular international teenagers for that amount.  In the baseball world it’s just a really insignificant amount of money to go through the trouble of slandering one of your players in front of the arbitration committee over.

Jose_Bautista
3 years 6 months ago

Not even!

$500,000 where I live is the entry level house price.

jayrig5
3 years 6 months ago

In the current market, most everywhere it’s more than enough for everything Trevor said.  But your point is still valid.

3 years 6 months ago

Sorry guys, I’m from Kansas. I can see it being different for the northeast, though.