![]() |
|
|
| |
« Marlins Interested In Luis Gonzalez | Main | About MLB Trade Rumors »
Susan Slusser of the San Francisco Chronicle was recently named Rumor Royalty for the A's. As part of the feature, I asked her a few questions.
MLBTR: It seems Joe Blanton is a hot commodity, but we're not hearing much about Huston Street or Mark Ellis. Do you expect any of these three to be with the team on Opening Day?
Slusser: I think Blanton gets moved by the trading deadline, at the latest, but probably before then. Street opens the season with the team but potentially could get moved by the deadline if a contender were to lose a closer, but overall, he's less likely than Blanton to get dealt - he's three years younger and, coming off an arm injury, he's not going to bring back as much. Ellis has one year left on his deal, so wouldn't bring a ton in return, plus he's a great guy to have as a role model for young players. Clearly, no one is untouchable at this point, but of all the A's more veteran guys, he's the best bet to be around all year.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e2010534c7ce7e970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Slusser On Blanton/Street/Ellis Trade Possibilities:


|
|
Is Street's value really that low? His injury was in the middle of the year, and he finished the season in quite a strong fashion. His numbers for the year were dominant. Granted, he could always be dealt in a year and Beane might extract a similar return as he might now, simply because someone of his ability with two years left on his deal is still worth quite a bit, but I don't think he has to prove himself this year in order to rebuild his value.
Posted by: achilles17 | January 09, 2008 at 02:11 PM
By two years left on his deal I mean two years under team control - obviously he is arbitration eligible. The principle remains the same though.
Posted by: achilles17 | January 09, 2008 at 02:12 PM
I think it would be really smart to wait to trade Street until someone is DESPERATE. If someone's closer goes down, the As could get a ton for him!
Posted by: bleed DODGER blue | January 09, 2008 at 02:13 PM
Well from what I have read when the Brewers asked about Street, Beane asked for Corey Hart, Rickie Weeks or Manny Parra...
And Melvin said HELL NO, CRAZY SOB, and your retarded...lol
Posted by: erbacaine | January 09, 2008 at 02:44 PM
Mark Ellis definitely makes sense to be around through 2008. His solid numbers could potentially lift him into the Type A FA category next Winter where teams such as the Cardinals could bring him on, giving the A's some nice draft picks.
With Blanton, I see him dealt by opening day. If the Braves were willing to take on Mark Kotsay's contract as well, they could potentially match up well with the Braves going all out for '08. It also makes sense to get a solid pitcher like Blanton with Smoltz and Glavine in their twilight years.
With Chavez & Street, I see Beane saving some chips for the trade deadline, hoping those two build their value up in the meantime. Same goes for Bobby Crosby.
If things go right, the A's could position themselves as a darkhorse contender as early as '09 and come back as a solid force in '10.
Posted by: WestCoastBias | January 09, 2008 at 02:46 PM
West Coast, ive been saying the blanton + kotsay for awhile now, but the A's would have to eat some of the contract. No way the braves would pay the full 8 million. i do like the idea of blanton in the middle of the rotation however.
Posted by: thedeuce | January 09, 2008 at 02:53 PM
"Well from what I have read when the Brewers asked about Street, Beane asked for Corey Hart, Rickie Weeks or Manny Parra...
And Melvin said HELL NO, CRAZY SOB, and your retarded...lol"
Well from what I read, that is nonsensical b.s. and you're retarded...ROFLMAOCOPTERBRBFWIWLOL.
Posted by: ArodSucksAtLife | January 09, 2008 at 03:04 PM
I don't like the idea of paring Kotsay or Crosby or Chavez with someone like Blanton or Street in order to deal them.
The A's can afford to eat Kotsay's salary for the year, as it is his last, and even if they don't, they can deal him alone (I mean, they found someone to take Kendall!) or maybe someone will take him off waivers.
If you deal Blanton or Street, get as much as you can for them. Don't reduce their trade value.
Posted by: Zonis | January 09, 2008 at 03:08 PM
As a Brewer fan I still though would rather have Chavez...If Beane would take one of our excess pitchers..like Vargas, Bush or Cappuano...but with the way Beane is going prospect happy I doubt he would take one of those 3
Posted by: erbacaine | January 09, 2008 at 03:17 PM
Arodsucks-
Actually those players have been asked about by Beane when they talked about Street at the Winter Meetings...and thats right around the same time that the Nationals asked for Rickie Weeks for Chad cordero.
A few days after that Doug Melvin basically told everyone that would listen that Weeks, Hart, Braun, Fielder, and Yovanni Gallardo are complete Untouchables
He has also said that it would take a great offer to get rid of Sheets, Parra, Villanueva or Hardy.
Those are facts
Posted by: erbacaine | January 09, 2008 at 03:23 PM
I see the A's hanging onto all four of those guys, unless they are given a too good to pass up deal from some club.
Having a solid veteran at the top of your rotation, back of your bullpen, and two gold glove-caliber infielders takes a ton of pressure of the young pitchers while also giving them someone to look to for how things are done in the big leagues.
Guys I see as more likely to go: Dan Johnson, Kiko Calero, and Alan Embree. You can add Kotsay to the list if anyone will actually take him.
Posted by: jclay | January 09, 2008 at 03:44 PM
According to rotoworld, the Braves have been in contact w/ Beane regarding Kotsay. Whould this be a low level prospect for a salary dump type deal? And if they do trade him would this open the door for a trade for Coco Crisp
Posted by: turnthe2 | January 09, 2008 at 03:48 PM
the only thing thats going to open up a crisp deal, is when santana is, or is finally not moved, until then crisp will remain with the sox
Posted by: 04Forever | January 09, 2008 at 04:00 PM
"Those are facts"
Your face is a fact. ooooooooooooooooh. burn.
If that's true then consider me pwned like a n00b.
I just don't buy that Billy Beane asked for a Rickie Weeks/Houston Street trade. TTFN. LOL.
Posted by: ArodSucksAtLife | January 09, 2008 at 04:25 PM
WestCoastBias - I completely agree with you. A darkhorse for '09 wouldn't be that big of a shocker. This team, completely healthy, could actually surprise and finish around 82 wins (like the '05 A's which won 88). I actually wouldn't be surprised to see Beane re-sign Mark Ellis (especially with Kotsay's $8 Mill or so coming off the books). He isn't young but he is arguably a top five secondbaseman in the AL. Plus, Donnie Murphy can't hit and we have no 2B (let alone SS) prospects to speak of.
Huston Street's value is very low. He didn't just have an injury last year, he had injuries in '06 as well. His fantasic rookie season in '05 is his only fully healthy season in the majors.
The only three players that I'd like to see moved that are left are: Mark Kotsay, Alan Embree, and Joe Blanton. I really like Blanton, I think he is a very solid work horse that just gets the job done but in a lost season...on the flip side, we'd have no 200 inning pitchers left if he gets traded. Embree, although he had a surprisingly great year for us isn't needed on a non-contending team when we have guys like Blevins/Casilla/Brown who need the seasoning. I love Kotsay but we aren't contending so don't give AB's to a veteran of his ilk.
Posted by: Droptop | January 09, 2008 at 05:27 PM
I think that saying the A's are a 2009 potential darkhorse is being a bit too optimistic. What'll your lineup look like?
C- Kurt Suzuki
1B- Daric Barton
2B- Mark Ellis??
3B- E. Chavez? I'd be surprised.
SS- Crosby? A donkey?
LF- Ryan Sweeney
CF- Carlos Gonzalez
RF- Travis Buck
DH- Cust? Chris Carter?
Rotation:
Gio Gonzalez, Brett Anderson, Fautino De Los Santos, Chad Gaudin, Lenny Dinardo?
Maybe if like every player they got from the D-Backs and White Sox works out then they could be. But I'd be shocked. Yeah they have a good farm system again, but I think 2010 or 2011 is a better target for contention. Especially with the way the Angels and Mariners look, especially if Seattle gets Bedard. LA just has too much pitching to me. Who in that division would beat Lackey, Escobar, Weaver, Garland, Saunders/Santana/Adenhart.
Plus, lets just see what Beane does here. He'll most likely deal everyone else for more prospects. And most of the guys he's gotten won't be ready for the majors for a while. Gio will probably pitch next year but a lot of these guys are high potential guys that won't arrive til 2010.
Posted by: scribbletone | January 09, 2008 at 07:24 PM
I'm a die hard, optimistic A's fan, but I'd have to agree with scribbletone. I can see a ton of potential in that lineup, but it would be quite an alignment of the planets for them to all develop/peak. Then the rotation would have to fall into place, which is a major longshot in itself. If the 2008 team shows some promise and plays >.500 ball, it wouldn't surprise me if Beane took a shot with a veteran or two next off season. Maybe another Frank Thomas type of deal, just to give a glimmer of hope for contending. If not, revenue is going to absolutely suck for the next few years.
You never know, but Bonds is still available. He'd at least make the season interesting and put some butts in the seats.
Posted by: 1quik6 | January 09, 2008 at 11:52 PM