« Dodgers Not Interested In Inge? |
Main
| A's Not Interested In Pierre »
By Tim Dierkes [March 4, 2008 at 11:28am CST]
SI.com's Jon Heyman believes C.C. Sabathia's three most likely landing spots next winter are the Yankees, Dodgers, and Giants, in that order.
While Sabathia/Tim Lincecum/Matt Cain would be nasty, I can't see the Giants doing another $100MM+ pitching contract. Then again, I didn't see them as a top suitor for Aaron Rowand this winter.
Let's take a look at some other possibilities for C.C. I agree that the Yanks and Dodgers will be top contenders.
- Blue Jays - An A.J. Burnett replacement? Not likely; the Jays don't have a ton of money coming off the books beyond Burnett. And Roy Halladay's salary increases by $4.25MM.
- Mets - They seem more likely to go after Mark Teixeira, though they could lose Pedro and Oliver Perez after this year.
- Red Sox - Can't count 'em out. They'll probably at least check in.
- Rays - A .500 run this year, followed by a major free agent splash for a contending '09 team? Would be fun, but I expect them to be more fiscally responsible.
- Tigers - Adding Sabathia to replace Kenny Rogers could be the icing on the cake of a very good team. Will depend on how Verlander/Willis/Bonderman/Robertson hold up this year.
- Royals - Long shot, though Dayton Moore has shown a willingness to spend some bucks on free agents. Could this be his version of the Braves' Maddux signing?
- Angels - I think they'll be in the mix; Garland is a free agent and Escobar has question marks.
- Phillies - Would be an interesting way for the new GM to introduce himself. Burrell leaving means $14MM off the books, though many have rising salaries for '09. Plus the closer job will be open.
- Cubs - Many Cubs' players' salaries increase significantly in '09. Zambrano by $2.75MM, Ramirez by $1.65MM, Soriano by $3MM, Fukudome by $5.5MM, Lilly by $5MM, Marquis by $3.5MM. That's over $20 mil right there, and for that reason I don't see it.
- Astros - This seems a fair possibility; they've shown a willingness to give out huge deals. They could be faced with $10MM in increases on current players, though, so it would require a major payroll increase.
- I don't see any other clubs that would entertain a $100MM+ contract. Thoughts?
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e200e550ac252a8834
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Heyman's Sabathia Suitors:
I wonder if the Rangers could be possible suitors. Much like your D-Rays note... if the Rangers play .500 ball this year with their youth movement, is it possible Hicks would break the bank for an ace before 09? He's got the Arod, Teix, Gagne, Lofton money off the books and (thankfully) didn't give crazy money to Hunter. I wonder if landing C.C. might be an option?
Posted by: HaegerChamp | March 04, 2008 at 11:38 AM
Don't count out the Reds. Griffey's eligible for a buyout next year, which frees up 12M.
Keep in mind that the Reds were in the mix for Erik Bedard, knowing that he would require a similar contract if they resigned him.
Posted by: reds37win | March 04, 2008 at 11:48 AM
I feel sorry for whoever signs him. He will most likely go into Free Agency with 1,600 Innings on his 28 yr old 275+ lb frame.
I can see him having a few good years and then pulling a Colon.
Posted by: XD23 | March 04, 2008 at 11:50 AM
I'd like to see the Reds go after him. They've been looking for a stud southpaw forever and with Griffey and/or Dunn coming off the books next year it'd be pretty to see Harang/Sabathia/Arroyo/Bailey/Cueto in 2009. He'd be the Bedard of this year without having to give up all our prized prospects. Extend Dunn and sign Sabathia= NL Central 2009 champs.
Posted by: TheNatural | March 04, 2008 at 11:50 AM
I don't see the Mets as a contender on this one. Do they really want to have 2 megadeal pitchers on their payroll? Seems awfully risky.
Posted by: FineHamAbounds | March 04, 2008 at 11:55 AM
I happen to be a big Sabathia fan so my initial instinct was to shoot down the Colon comparison, but numbers-wise they are pretty close at this point in their careers, service time-wise. The big difference is that Sabathia started his MLB career 4 years younger than Colon. So, even if Sabathia follows Colon's path and starts breaking down at 33, that still puts him 5 or 6 years into what will likely be a 6 or 7 year contract.
Posted by: BigScooter | March 04, 2008 at 11:56 AM
Harang would not be the ace of that staff. It would be C.C., and it's not even close.
Posted by: stellar | March 04, 2008 at 11:56 AM
I wonder if he'd consider taking a discount to stay in Cleveland. A core of Martinez, Hafner, Sizemore, Carmona, Sabathia, and Peralta would be a team that could conted for years. But other than that I see Steinbrenner pulling out all the stops for Sabathia if the Yanks don't win it all.
Reds are an intriguing possibility, Sabathia/Harang would jump as the most dominating 1-2 punch in the NL.
But honestly, I see him as a Yankee or an Indian next year.
Posted by: start_wearing_purple | March 04, 2008 at 11:56 AM
Let BOTH Dunn and KGJ go and that shaves at least $22 million off the Reds 2009 payroll. I say at least because KGJ's option is for $16.25 million and Dunn is going to want MORE than the $13 million he is going to get in 2008. So, WHY should the Reds pay those two a combined $30 million for 2009?
KGJ is injury prone (one of the MAIN reasons why some Reds fans were happy Josh Hamilton was traded away) and can't make it through an entire season.
As for Dunn, combining his Offense with his Defense, he is no better than an average fielding Left Fielder and getting a guy who can play average Defense and who drives in 80 to 85 Runs would cost a heck of a lost LESS than paying Dunn $15 (or more) million a year.
So, go after Sabathia and an average fielding Left Fielder and it wont cost much more, if any, than what bringing Dunn and KGJ back for 2009 would but it would give the Reds a MUCH better shot at winning than what those two do.
Posted by: ctownboy | March 04, 2008 at 12:01 PM
the cardinals have a fair bit of $$ coming off the books next year and are primed to head back into "win now" mode with carpenter coming back healthy. while i don't think they'd sign anyone to a $100m contract, they will probably seriously consider signing sabathia.
Posted by: MO Boiler | March 04, 2008 at 12:01 PM
The Atlanta Braves.
Posted by: JPX7 | March 04, 2008 at 12:02 PM
Why not the Braves? If they lose Teixeira, I can almost guarantee Wren will go after atleast one of the big name free agents next offseason. With Glavine, Hampton and Teixeira's salaries off the book, I think the Braves could make a very nice offer for the big lefty.
Posted by: Bravesfan89 | March 04, 2008 at 12:04 PM
Stellar:
More than likely Sabathia would be placed in between Harang and Arroyo because of the R-L-R effect. This is the same thing going on in Arizona with Webb-RJ-Haren, R-L-R. I know what I'm talking about so shush.
Posted by: TheNatural | March 04, 2008 at 12:05 PM
stellar, it's actually a lot closer than you think. Their WHIPs last year were the same, Harang had a better k/9 rate, and has thrown 200+ innings in three seasons to Sabathia's one. His ERA has been .50 higher than Sabathia's for the alst two seasons, I'll concede. But still, Harang is someone who could be a co-staff ace with Sabathia.
Posted by: start_wearing_purple | March 04, 2008 at 12:05 PM
He's gotta be a Yankee. Young, lefthanded, chance to compile some historic numbers. Yanks definitely need a pitcher next year and have money to spend. Do the math.
Posted by: BigScooter | March 04, 2008 at 12:08 PM
You should do this with other big free agents like Teixeira, I enjoy reading posts like this.
Posted by: dudewheresmygrl | March 04, 2008 at 12:11 PM
I can buy into the idea of the Braves upon a Teixeira loss, that makes some sense.
Posted by: Tim Dierkes | March 04, 2008 at 12:14 PM
i really cant picture CC going to NY... i guess money talks but i really only seeing CC playing in Cleveland or California next year....
Posted by: TribeFan06 | March 04, 2008 at 12:19 PM
I'd see the Braves trying to spread their money around on several FAs and not just one big splash. If Tex leaves and Smoltz retires, BOTH their lineup and rotation looks pretty damn weak. Signing Sabathia would be like plugging a hole in a damn with a piece of gum.
Posted by: TheNatural | March 04, 2008 at 12:20 PM
Ok I know this may sound really out there but what about the Nationals ass a dark horse... They move into a new stadium and are going with youth... they have a small payroll so adding a huge contract won't hurt them that much... also if they want to contend in the East they are going to have to make a move or 2.. I doubt it'll happen but it has an outside shot
Posted by: UW_RON | March 04, 2008 at 12:20 PM
It's not a shot period. They can offer him a contract sure, but why would Sabathia go there?
Posted by: TheNatural | March 04, 2008 at 12:24 PM
You know, Sabathia to the Royals would be hilarious. A Sabathia/Meche/Bannister/Davies/Hochevar rotation would make them one of the strangly better rotations out there.
Posted by: start_wearing_purple | March 04, 2008 at 12:32 PM
I wouldn't rule out the Cubs because of what they already have. New owner may want to make a big splash and why not make it with a big arm. I think that until we know who the new owner will be it will be hard to figure out anything in terms of FAs for next year or even deadline trades for this year. Who knows maybe Mark Cuban gets the team and starts to buy up big talent like C.C.
Posted by: airassault101 | March 04, 2008 at 12:40 PM
I think the chances of the Braves landing Sabathia if they lose Teixera are slim to none. You have to look at salary increases for next year too, not just what payroll they will be shedding... They'd have Tex's $12mil, Hamptons $8mil (per accounting purposes, thats what is "on the books"), and if Glavine retires another $7mil freed up... Thats $27mil right there - However, if you look at the actual (or estimated) increase in salaries for McCann: +$3.5mil; Francoeur: +$4mil; Kelly Johnson: +$3mil; Matt Diaz: +$1.5mil; Rafael Soriano: +$3mil; and say another $3mil in random salary arbitration increases like Yates, Gonzalez, and Infante the Braves would only be looking at around $9mil extra to spend ($27mil subtracted, $18mil added)...
Plus, I'd much rather pay Tex big time money over Sabathia - Hitters are inherently more valuable than pitchers (play every day, less of an injury risk, etc...)
Bottom line, unless the payroll jumps to $100+ mil I see no way that the Braves could get Sabathia...
Posted by: DonCoburleone | March 04, 2008 at 12:42 PM
The Royals will make an offer but to get C.C. to play in KC they'll have to pay extra, unless they play .500 ball (which is highly unlikely). I also think the rotation would have Greinke in the 4th spot over Davies though.
Posted by: Billy Heywood | March 04, 2008 at 12:59 PM
Angels ~ too many guys they need to lock up already, with plenty of SP prospects in the wings and a park which helps youngsters look better than they really are. Plus, they really cant dramatically increase payroll, it has been an issue every year in Anaheim despite being perceived a non-issue by people outside the area.
Dodgers ~ see above
Tigers ~ too many other places they will be spending a fortune – C and 2 OF spots (or OF and DH) plus raises to everyone in the rotation because of recent contracts, the need to lock up Cabrera, and a question on SS (pick up Renteria or sign someone else?). They would be pushing NY salary if they were to also add CC.
Yankees ~ depends on if its Hank or Hal/Cashman in charge. If Hank ~ yeah… If Hal/Cashman ~ no, they go with the 10+ kids they have in the high-minors/ML-camp to fill most rotation spots and just sign a mid-level guy to eat innings.
Giants ~ no. Cain/Linc/Zito already make/will-make too much in the rotation. They need hitters much more than pitchers, and will spend their cash there.
Cubs ~ actually might be an interesting situation. If Zambrano doesn’t provide more than SP2-type results again in 2008 then they might be looking for an Ace. If they were able to move the cash owed to Marquis and dump the money they are paying to Dempster/Lieber then all of a sudden the salary is covered. They could find a 5th guy from within so they wouldn’t need even more cash spent on the rotation either…
Tex/Hou/Atl/Cin I guess could all be possibilities under certain circumstances, but I really think CC either wants to be in the BayArea/possibly-LA or Cleveland. I know he will get quite a bit of interest, but I think it would be more from surprise teams (possibly TB or Wash or maybe Pitt) than from what people perceive the obvious suitors (if he leaves)
Posted by: darkstar1661 | March 04, 2008 at 01:05 PM
Tim,
besides my earlier comment you may want to consider that if the Cubs trade away Marquis that money also opens up. I think most Cubs fans could deal with this rotation:
1. Big Z
2. C.C.
3. Lilly
4. Hill
5. Dem/Lieber/anyone still left after all these trades :)
Posted by: airassault101 | March 04, 2008 at 01:07 PM
if the cubs were to sign c.c. this might be a better option.
1. c.c.
2. z
3. hill
4. gallagher
5. veal
I would trade hill and try to get a shortstop. this offsets some of the money c.c. would get by trading off lilly.
Posted by: integr96 | March 04, 2008 at 01:36 PM
sorry... not hill, trade lilly
Posted by: integr96 | March 04, 2008 at 01:36 PM
DonCoburleone - I completely agree with you on the Braves. I've been trying to make this point lately, you can't just look at contracts coming off the books without considering salary increases. No way the Braves get into a bidding war for CC.
darkstar1661 - completely disagree with your take on the Yankees. Yes they like their young players, but none of them will be as good as CC will be next year. He is a legit ace and that's something the Yanks need. Money won't be an issue and let's see which of the Yanks Generation Trey kids actually pan out by next season.
Posted by: BigScooter | March 04, 2008 at 01:47 PM
“darkstar1661 - completely disagree with your take on the Yankees. Yes they like their young players, but none of them will be as good as CC will be next year. He is a legit ace and that's something the Yanks need. Money won't be an issue and let's see which of the Yanks Generation Trey kids actually pan out by next season.”
…And that’s fine, I just think Hal/Cashman will be more willing to make a rotation out of Wang/Hughes/Joba/Kennedy/Horne/Marquez/Jackson/Etc… All that SP talent was brought in for a reason, and I think they would like to do everything possible to build their rotation out of it with inning-eaters if its needed as a stop-gap. I have no doubt Hank will throw the cash around freely if he holds all the power, I just think if Hal/Cashman are more in charge, they will probably see a 15+Mil/6+year contract to a pitcher as unneeded risk that the team doesn’t need to take with so much depth near ready to begin with. They very well could still go after him, just not sure they are a certainty to do so…
They will also need to be spending almost all the money saved from guys off the book in raises to Wang/Cano/Melky while filling offensive holes left by Damon/Giambi/Abreu/1B
Posted by: darkstar1661 | March 04, 2008 at 02:11 PM
Dark,
I believe Dempster and Lieber are both free agents after the year anyway...so trading Marquis is really the only hard part of freeing up that money. Still, there are a lot of players getting big raises. I don't know if they can afford what it would take to outbid the yankees. What do you think, 6 years 141 mil? Thats my guess on what a Yanks offer would be...and I just don't see anyone else beating that.
Posted by: Aduncaroo | March 04, 2008 at 02:47 PM
Maybe 6 years, 130 mil might be more accurate.
Posted by: Aduncaroo | March 04, 2008 at 02:49 PM
I'm only going to throw this out there because it's been on my mind for a little while since Bedard signed a 1 year deal last month instead of a long-term deal and so far I'm not thrilled with how he's handling the press conferences, he doesn't seem overly comfortable and that could change by next offseason or it might not. Sabathia by the way is nowhere near the same story as Colon. Aside from both pitching for the Indians and having an above-average fastball, they have nothing in common. Colon is 6'0" and 260 pounds plus the weight of whatever didn't escape from his clutches at the buffet line, I mean that guy must've been down in Vegas buffet hopping like Paris Hilton goes club hopping. Anywho, I'd say he's closer to 285-290 lbs. now-a-days. Sabathia is 6'7" and 275 lbs. which is like a guy being 6'0" and 225-230lbs. it's a lot of weight for a guy that runs a lot, but he's a pitcher who gets to rest for 4-5 day in a row. I'd be more concerned with Prince Fielder being Colon size at 6'0" and 260lbs. than I would with Sabathia's size. If Prince Fielder doesn't stop eating so damn much and get his butt in shape, he'll be worth almost nothing as a 1B when compared with his counterparts. Fielder will either suffer continual injuries or he'll drop in power to 30 HRs every year from the constant wear-and-tear of the season with no real opportunity to DH outside of interleague play.
That darkhorse team that someone alluded to, could be the Mariners. Sure it's a longshot in some estimations, but here's my thinking....
Silva is a Mariner for 4 years because he was just signed to that contract and won't get traded one year into it and more likely than not his contract wouldn't make sense for most teams, even in the 4th season of the deal let alone next season.
Felix will get tied into a long term deal, but worst case he's a Mariner for 4 more years including 2008.
Bedard, Batista, and Washburn will each have one more year left on their deals following the 2008 season.
I realize that Seattle was kept off this list because of their rotation being solid top-to-bottom, but I could see a huge problem coming over the hill if they don't sign Bedard long-term and if I can see it, so can the Mariners brass.
I think if for no other reason that they would obviously improve their rotation by dropping either Washburn or Batista for Sabathia this deal could get done. The real motivator would be that three starters would be leaving after 2008 and the last time that happened they filled those holes with Batista, Weaver, and Ramirez and 2/3 of the new guys were the best at being the worst last year in terms of starters!
If they sign Sabathia than they gain leverage in negotiating with Bedard and if Erik leaves they still have a solid 1-2 punch atop the rotation. If Bedard decides to stay and signs the long anticipated extension, you would then have by far the best rotation in baseball. You trade away Washburn or Batista whomever has the most value and regardless of which guy stays, they are inherently better off and with the contracts Washburn and Batista have, they would only being raising their payroll around $10MM for one season and then the player they keep out of Batista and Washburn would be given the green light to walk and they would fill the last spot in the rotation with a young guy like Phillippe Aumont or Juan Ramirez. Another possibility is that one of Aumont or Ramirez makes a hard push during spring training for a rotation spot in 2009 and it makes both Washburn and Batista expendable.
The Mariners will remain a darkhorse until they see what they have with their current rotation, but with Felix forced to take a major paycut, compared with his ability, over the four years, there is no better time than the present for them to make a huge jump into free agency and with the money coming off the books from Vidro and Sexson they can afford Teixeira to play 1B or Bryan LaHair could keep opening eyes like he has done the last couple spring training camps making the money a real non-issue!
Posted by: BaseballGuru | March 04, 2008 at 02:50 PM
3 starters will be leaving after 2009, sorry I said 2008...
Posted by: BaseballGuru | March 04, 2008 at 02:53 PM
The green light to walk would be after the contract expires. I wasn't very clear, but I'm trying to get ready to leave...
Posted by: BaseballGuru | March 04, 2008 at 02:55 PM
I'm surprised no one has mentioned the MARINERS
if they cant manage to sign BADARD to a long term deal (which is definitely a possibility) they would probably throw a ridiculus contract at Carsten Charles S.
Posted by: skoorbo | March 04, 2008 at 03:00 PM
Assuming the Cubs will want to keep Lilly and that they rid themselves of Marquis and Dem They would be right in the mix for C.C.
1. C.C.
2. Big Z
3. Lilly (re-signed)
4. Hill
5. young arm from within system..maybe Jeff Samardzija who they think will be ready.
Now thats a nice looking rotation.
Posted by: airassault101 | March 04, 2008 at 03:04 PM
oh... right
Posted by: skoorbo | March 04, 2008 at 03:06 PM
We get it Guru; you are a Mariners fan
Posted by: ArodMVP217 | March 04, 2008 at 03:07 PM
By the way, there is no way on God's green earth that Sabathia makes more than 20 mil. per season. He's a TOR starter with Ace like capability, but he won't make more money than Santana like every other player in baseball won't make more money than Pay-Rod. The fact is that both Johan and Alex are overhyped underperformers especially when you look at their postseason resume. However, every one in baseball whose opinion matters thinks they are the best pitcher and position player in baseball and they set the salary constraints on what everyone else is worth. Bedard may be able to come close to what Santana got, but Sabathia isn't even the 3rd best lefty in the game behind Santana and Bedard. By the way, I think Peavy & Haren are better than Santana & Bedard, and Lackey rounds out the top 5 starters in baseball, but Sabathia is definitely a top 10 starter. Since Peavy & Haren are locked into long term deals and Lackey will probably give a hometown discount, I don't see Sabathia getting more than $18-19MM a season, but he'll get 6 years for sure. Figure about $110-115MM over 6 seasons. Lackey will get around $100MM and I get the feeling that Bedard won't ask for top dollar, so he'll probably be in that $100MM over 6 year range when he signs.
Posted by: BaseballGuru | March 04, 2008 at 03:14 PM
ArodMVP217,
It's not my fault that your favorite player can't hit when it matters. All those years of watching the postseason from Texas must have diminished his skills once he reaches the 7th month of the season! What a bum... He's definitely not worth the $310MM over 10 seasons that he got! The curse of A-Rod is alive and well!
So everyone else can throw around the Cubs in every blog, but I'm not aloud to bring up the Mariners?!
Posted by: BaseballGuru | March 04, 2008 at 03:21 PM
once again i'm not a big a rod fan, but your just a hater, the guy is the best position player in baseball.
he hits for average, hrs, rbi's and he plays a good third base.
saying a rod is a bum just makes you look stupid.
is a rod or santana overpaid..? maybe.
THEY ARE HUGE ATTRACTIONS AND MAKE THEIR TEAM A BUNCH OF MONEY.
could cc make more than santana. yes because he is the biggest ace in the free agent pool.
he said on SI that he's got bad genes and have to work his ass off to be in his current shape.
so far in his career he has been a good pitcher.
cc sabathia or texira will be in yankees uniform next year.
i can't see them having about 70 million free and dont sign a big name,
lets just hope huges is an ok pitcher, and joba can be a 3.90 or 4.00 era pitcher.
we might have
CC
Wang
Hughes
Chamberlin
And maybe another good starter.
i hope that happends.
Posted by: BxSquad | March 04, 2008 at 03:56 PM
“The Mariners will remain a darkhorse until they see what they have with their current rotation, but with Felix forced to take a major paycut, compared with his ability, over the four years, there is no better time than the present for them to make a huge jump into free agency and with the money coming off the books from Vidro and Sexson they can afford Teixeira to play 1B or Bryan LaHair could keep opening eyes like he has done the last couple spring training camps making the money a real non-issue!”
…But their money is probably better spent at the plate, where the team has many more questions. Felix/Bedard/Silva/Washburn/Batista are all signed for 2009 at this point, but I don’t think they are really sure who will be playing at any (or all) of C, 1B, 2B, SS or LF/CF (depends on where Ichiro is) come 2009…
“but Sabathia isn't even the 3rd best lefty in the game behind Santana and Bedard.”
…are you not the person who was stating that Bedard wasn’t an ace because he hasn’t pitched 200IP?
Posted by: darkstar1661 | March 04, 2008 at 03:58 PM
Believe it or not, I think the Nats will be a big player for Sabathia. They'll have the money (low payroll now, lots of money coming in from the new ballpark) and I think they will spend it on a pitcher who will eat innings. Who better to do that than Sabathia? And also...DC is a predominantly black city. I could see them going after a guy like Sabathia that could serve as a role model and perhaps help a movement for urban youth baseball in DC.
Posted by: thehoagster07 | March 04, 2008 at 04:46 PM
Not a lot of Giants fans commenting but I think CC would be a great fit for the Giros...
We're dumping Durham, Aurilia, and we can decline the options for Winn and Vizquel in '09... Leaving us with close to 20 to 30 mil on top of the money that we saved this year by not signing Barry.
The Giants have a number athletic prospects moving up from AAA that are gonna get a shot at the show this year with another handful of up in coming AA position prospects that are playing well... the FA class next year has no real stars on offense after Texeria and he probably wont wanna come into a pitchers park anyway. Not to mention Angel Villanoa the Giants stud position prospect will be getting closer to playing in the majors in the near future.
Deal the dough for CC and a strong bullpen arm (maybe Joe Nathan - former Giant) and the Giants will have one of the best rotations in MLB history. They have the money and Cain, Linccumm will be locked up for another 4 years.
Not to mention they have some strong pitching prospects they can trade for young bats! No brainer, plus hes from the Bay Area - giving us a better shot at a home town discount.
CC = Giants Dynasty
Dodgers Suck
Posted by: Ohan | March 04, 2008 at 05:01 PM
how did you get your D and C to interlock? that is sweet
let me try; DC
Posted by: ArodMVP217 | March 04, 2008 at 05:02 PM
No I never said that, if anything my argument is that he has pitched an average of 189 innings over the last two seasons, which is only an out per start short of 200 IP. I think too much is made of the number of innings you pitch especially when you consider the bullpen. With the Mariners they may start the season with Rowland-Smith, Dickey, and Baek in their bullpen due to a need for a second lefty besides O'Flaherty if Cesar Jimenez doesn't win the job out of camp, the rule 5 guidelines that dictate Dickey has to stay on the 25-man roster, and finally Baek is out of options. So I'd rather have 6.2 great innings out of Bedard than 7 innings out of just about any other starter not listed in my my top 5!
As far as the positions you talk about, they are reluctant to move Jeff Clement and Rob Johnson down to the minors but they really don't have room on the ML club with Johjima and Burke all ready promised the starting and backup catcher positions on the 25-man. As for 2B and SS, they have Lopez and Betancourt both signed for at least the next 4 seasons each and Betancourt has 5 years left. Ichiro is showing no signs of aging and I would expect him to play CF until his current 5 year contract expires, when he'll be 38 years old and at that point he may move to LF for his final big league contract. In the mean time the question marks would be LF and RF. RF will be Balentien without a doubt and some people think he's ready to play full-time this season, but by next year he'll be in a position to lose the position rather than having to win it, during spring training. LF should be filled by a combination of Charlton Jimerson and Jeremy Reed if they stay in house. It's beyond me why Jimerson can't get any love on the major league level since he kills the ball every time he gets a chance to play and he's a solid fielder with good range. If Reed can escalate his play on the big league level to duplicate his the AVG. along with the HR, RBI, and SB per game ratio... He'd be good for 20 HRs, 20-30 SBs, and 85 RBIs with a .300 AVG. He put up similar numbers to that in the minor leagues with far less ABs. Jimerson was impressive in only 387 ABs over 99 games before getting called up to Seattle. His stat line last year when combining his two stops in the minors: .282 AVG, 61 R, 109 hits, 22 2B, 4 3B, 25 HR, 80 RBI, 35 SB with a 77% success rate, .348 OBP, .553 SLG, .901 OBP
I think you'll see Balentien and Jimerson as the bookends around Ichiro in the Mariners starting outfielders by 2009 and Reed will be the 4th outfielder, Morse and Bloomquist will be the utility everything, Rob Johnson will be the backup catcher and depending on what they do with Johjima Clement will be the starting DH or catcher. The only real questions on offense is 1B Teixeira or LaHair and 3B Beltre or Tuiasosopo/Mangini/Free Agent. Don't kid yourself this offense is not as bad as it looks. There are some young guys about to blossom and they'll surprise you. I'll go on record as saying this team will be a top 4 offense in the AL and top 7 in all of baseball when ranked by runs scored. They won't hit a ton of homeruns, but they have a ton of depth and solid hitters at every position.
If you want their number one at all positions after the 25-man is set here it is, with everyone of these guys having a 70% chance or greater of playing in the major leagues by 2009 if not starting at their position:
some are repeated if they have more than one position and the outfield has lots of flexibility, only Wilson and Balentien shouldn't be a regular in centerfield. Triunfel and young guys like him will be kept in the minors past 2009 to keep depth in the system.
C Jeff Clement, Rob Johnson, Adam Moore
1B Bryan LaHair, Matt Mangini
2B Yung Chi-Chen, Tug Hulett
3B Matt Tuiasosopo, Matt Mangini
SS Carlos Triunfel, Oswaldo Navarro
LF Michael Saunders, Michael Wilson
CF Jeremy Reed, Gregory Halman
RF Wladimir Balentien, Charlton Jimerson
Posted by: BaseballGuru | March 04, 2008 at 05:08 PM
“No I never said that, if anything my argument is that he has pitched an average of 189 innings over the last two seasons, which is only an out per start short of 200 IP.”
…Someone did, I thought it was you. No biggie…
As far as the M’s positions… Yeah, I will never say they don’t have some kids that look like they can be really solid ML performers, but the chances of all of those positions having a solid Play-Off type contributor manning them after the season is probably rather slim. Positions like C/SS/2B/LF (or CF if Ichiro moves over) would all probably be better places to spend the money than yet another SP when there will be 6 singed (I forgot that Ramirez will still be under contract) for a salary well north of 40M already ~ Washburn 10M-ish, Batista 9M, Silva 11M, Bedard probably 10M-ish, whatever Feliz and Ramirez make in Arb (possibly 4-6M-ish for Feliz and 3-4M for Ramirez?). That’s about 50M already, CC would be another 10M-ish on top of it even if he replaced one of those guys… I really just cant see them signing another pitcher, I think their money goes to position players. Maybe I’m wrong, its just what I see…
Posted by: darkstar1661 | March 04, 2008 at 06:06 PM
We get it Guru; you are a Mariners fan
Posted by: ArodMVP217 | March 04, 2008 at 03:07 PM
Rofl, damn what a post he made.
I think it's Indians or Yankees, and of course some interest in Boston.
As a Toronto fan, I wouldn't mind seeing it, Burnett's money off the books, and Thomas has an option for next year, think it's 385ABs this year, so they could limit him if they wanted. That being said I think they will get Bedard after 09 instead, unless he absolutely loves it in Seattle.
Posted by: juiced | March 04, 2008 at 06:12 PM
Thomas is 376 PAs...I think he gets there.
Posted by: Tim Dierkes | March 04, 2008 at 09:53 PM
'09 CC & Furcal to the Yanks, dump Damon, Jeter to LF, Melky to RF, Austin Jackson (think Chris Young) in CF.
CC
Wang
Joba
Hughes
IPK
Karstens/Rasner/Horne/Marquez
SS-Furcal
LF-Jeter
2B-Cano
3B-A-Hole
DH-Matsui
C-Posada
CF-A-Jax
1B-Duncan
RF-Melky
Posted by: maximumpotential | March 04, 2008 at 10:30 PM
I'm just wondering if you're in a mental hospital maximumpotential.
The Yankees are not going to sign Furcal and move Jeter to LF. Unless he gets called up due to an injury this year and does very well, Austin Jackson will not be the everyday venter-fielder next year. That's not reasonable. I agree that they should dump Damon, but who's gonna take him? The Yanks will probably re-sign Abreu because they need someone to fill the outfield while Jose Tabata and Austin Jackson get ready. I could see them signing Sabathia, but it really doesn't make an incredible amount of sense because they have Marquez/Horne/Brackman coming very soon. I think Sheets would make more sense because he will be productive, but would only require maybe 5 years. Then the Yankees leave themselves with a lot more options. It think that a lot depends on how the Trinity does this year. But they have way too much money coming off the books (60 million) this year for them not to sign either Tex, or some high profile Starting Pitcher.
Honestly, I don't know an incredible amount concerning the Mariners, but I do know that their rotation is plenty good with Bedard, Felix, and Washburn headlining it. They need run production, which Texeira can give them, so why would they spedn 20 mil on C.C. when they could get the run production they need by paying Tex the same amount.
C.C. will probably get 20 million over 7 years or somewhere around there. Someone will go crazy for him. Zito got 126 million, so it so insane for C.C. to get 140?
I think C.C. makes too much sense for the Dodgers. I think they go out on a limb and offer him maybe 7 years 137(?) million and that will be enough. It would be a great sign for the Dodgers and it would help C.C. to go to the National League.
Posted by: cv1 | March 04, 2008 at 11:05 PM
maximumpotential,
That doesnt look like that hot of a lineup for a club with such a high payroll and of course those unrealistic expectations. Spots 5-9 would be getting pretty close to a cake-walk in comparison to what the team usually throws out there…
2009 will see Posada/Matsui regress with another 1+ years on um. Jackson will have had minor to no real ML experience to that point. Duncan/Melky is cake to get through for the rest of the league. I cant imagine they wouldnt spend quite a bit of cash to upgrade atleast RF & 1B...
Posted by: darkstar1661 | March 04, 2008 at 11:26 PM
Cabrera is not "cake", he's average for the league. Plus, it doesn't help that he bats ninth. the Yankees use him as another lead off man on front of Damon.
Matsui's production will not regress. His defense has become terrible, but he's not gonna lose his bat.
Everyone said Posada would lose his bat last year. He's a catcher and I'm realistic, but I would say more like 2010 than 2009. Plus, the Yankees have one of the top rated catching prospects in Jesus Montero, so he'll be able to split time with Matsui at DH starting in 09 or 2010.
Posted by: cv1 | March 05, 2008 at 07:27 AM
Melky Car ~ .275/.340/.388 (90 OPS+)
Melky 2007 ~ .273/.327/.391 (89 OPS+)
08 AL Avg CF ~ .272/.340/.414 (99 OPS+)
08 AL-Avg Hitter ~ .271/.338/.423 (100 OPS+)
08 AL Avg RF ~ .288/.359/.465 (105 OPS+)
You can see that Melky falls well short of even the AL-Avg CF production, let alone the the AL Avg or AL RF.
Matsui 03 109 OPS+
Matsui 04 137 OPS+
Matsui 05 130 OPS+
Matsui 06 128 OPS+
Matsui 07 123 OPS+
Its not hard to see the pattern. Of particular concern is this split:
Prior to July ~ .269/.349/.433/.782 with 16 2B, 8 HR in 281 PA
In July alone ~ .345/.411/.735/1.146 with 5 2B and 13 HR in 129 PA
After July ~ .270/.363/.413/.776 with 7 2B, 4 3B and 4 HR in 224 PA
No clue what was going on, but that seems more a fluke month than anything else. If you look at the other 5 months though, you have a player somewhere in the .270/.355/.423/.778 ~ which is well short of what he has produced years prior.
Posada will be a 37 YO catcher in 2009. Really, no matter how good he is, I cant imagine seeing his production being that high at the age of 37 ~ well with him playing behind the plate atleast. Also, a good chunk of Posada’s can be explained in the .386 BAbip he experienced last year. If he had produced his normal, his BA would have been in the .280 range, quite different than the .338 he produced…
…Really, I just see that type of 5-9 to be rather easy pickings ~ and way to easy pickings for the Yanks to be fielding…
Posted by: darkstar1661 | March 05, 2008 at 12:52 PM
My point is that Seattle might not want to put all their eggs in one basket with Bedard. If they don't re-sign Erik and they pass on the opportunity to get Sabathia, then what do they do after 2009?!
Also, would it not be easier to sign Sabathia and then find someone to take Batista, Washburn, or two suitors to take them both than it would be to replace Bedard, Washburn, and Batista in the same offseason?!
What about after this season they trade Washburn and Batista to two teams, sign Sabathia, and move Morrow to the 5th spot in the rotation. At the beginning of the contract it didn't look like a smart deal signing Washburn to his four year pact, but in hindsight he could be very desired with one year left at 9-10 mil. and Batista at 8 or 9 mil. is one of the best deals in baseball compared to what you get. If nothing more than the flexibility to be both a starter and a reliever at a moments notice! If you move both of those guys y
Posted by: BaseballGuru | March 05, 2008 at 02:23 PM
the offseason before their walk years than you leave Bedard as the only spot in the rotation to fill. I don't think any team has brought in three new starters and done well at all. You just can't screw with the rotation that much and expect good things to happen!
They need stability before the 2009 season begins and that's what we're really talking about. Bringing in C.C. means they aren't going to take a major step back if Bedard doesn't re-up with the Mariners and they aren't having to shop for three starters after 2009. I agree that Teixeira is set for a decent to obsene payday and it could be the Mariners writing his checks out for the next 7 years starting in 2009, but I truly believe that signing Sabathia doesn't preclude them from bolstering their offense.
You are correct darkstar, there is almost no way in hell that they get even a good number of them to contribute in the next year, whether because of trades, being blocked at the major league level, promotion-demotion when they stumble, etc.
If the Mariners can replace one of the outfield positions most likely rightfield with Balentien and then get a leftfielder in trade for Batista or Washburn after signing C.C., then they could upgrade over Wilkerson and Ibanez without even spending more money. I'll speculate that a team like the Giants would bring in a veteran lefty, especially if they end up trading Lowry to the ChiSox. Hell, I'd take Fred Lewis for Washburn straight up if we were able to sign Sabathia. Also Lewis would be able to replace Ichiro in CF when the time comes or even allow Ichiro to go back to RF and Balentien could play LF. Either way, a trade like that allows the Mariners to keep the talent coming in and find fiscal ways of lowering the overall payroll in order to keep their four or five all-stars in Ichiro, Beltre, Bedard, Putz, and maybe Felix depending on which one shows up this year, as well as bring in a guy like Teixeira and/or Sabathia.
Posted by: BaseballGuru | March 05, 2008 at 02:45 PM
drop the "y", it's not supposed to be there.
Posted by: BaseballGuru | March 05, 2008 at 02:45 PM
Guru, but you are throwing out a ton of what-ifs and tinkering moves to try and force it to possibly fit. I mean; not resign Bedard, Sign CC, trade Washburn, trade Batista and hope all the fielding positions correct themselves or are fixed by the trades? I just don’t see it, the team has 6 (or 7 including Morrow) SP options for 2009 in house and possible questions in the lineup. CC would be an improvement, but his longterm cost and amount of tinkering needed to make it fit make it seem unrealistic to try to pull off instead of just upgrading the more obvious needs to begin with. Besides, why not just offer more to Bedard to get the deal done instead of go through all that work to pay CC more than you were going to pay Bedard to start? I just don’t see it as anything more than a stretch; I think it’s a possibility I guess, but a really slim one that is no where near worth it… Tex makes since, obvious dramatic upgrade that takes no tinkering to fit ~ CC though…
Posted by: darkstar1661 | March 05, 2008 at 04:02 PM
Darkstar, you're whole point is based around the .030 that Melky is behind in OPS. That's not an incredible amount. He is an average centerfielder.
Matsui hits 20 HR's, that's above average.
You are isolating stats and not looking at the whole picture. Melky makes up for that .040 with his defense, which is better than average. He's not a plus plus, but his arm is, and his overall defensive play can probably be graded as a plus. You can't just isolate stats and not take the whole game into play.
Posada had arguably the most consistent year any catcher has ever had last year. In the first four months he had 3 HR's in each, and his Average and OPS were within .010 in each consecutive month. If he was inconsistent I would be worried, but he wasn't.
Posted by: cv1 | March 06, 2008 at 09:43 AM
I think he is implying teh 5-9 spots will be below average for a yankee offense
I like the furcal + CC + Resign Abreu - JD - Matsui (room for Posada/Miranda)
Furcal SS
Jeter LF
Abreu RF 'til he loses it
Alex 3B
Cano 2B 'til he improves k/BB rate
Posada C
Duncan/Miranda 1B Platoon |OR| Big Tex
Montero/Posada/Cabrera/Jeter share it like ANA
Ajax/Melky CF
CC/Sheets(at less yrs)
Wang
Hughes
Joba
IPK/Pettitte(hey, if the price is right)
Posted by: ArodMVP217 | March 07, 2008 at 10:30 AM