![]() |
|
|
| |
« Duchscherer Hopes To Sign Extension With A's | Main | Angels Content With Roster »
In a perfect world, the Mets will get two corner outfielders back this month in Ryan Church and Moises Alou. If either player has a major setback, GM Omar Minaya plans to look at the trade market more aggressively.
One option is free agent Barry Bonds. Minaya hasn't called Bonds' agent Jeff Borris and doesn't plan to. Borris sent a statement through a spokesman saying the team does not have interest in his client. Minaya, however, did not completely dismiss the idea of signing Bonds. On the other hand, he didn't imply interest. Kenny Lofton is another, less controversial free agent Minaya could consider.
If the Mets choose to enter the trade market for corner outfielders later this month, options abound. Jason Bay, Matt Holliday, Xavier Nady, Brian Giles, and Raul Ibanez would be tough to pry loose though. Adam Dunn is an interesting name, and recent reports indicate that he is not highly sought-after. Minaya could also consider less certain players such as Matt Murton, Frank Catalanotto, and Juan Rivera.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e200e553aa0f458834
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Mets Not Interested In Bonds:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
add Marcus Thames to that list.
Posted by: moebarguy | July 08, 2008 at 11:02 AM
No one is interested in Bond's...
Posted by: bum76 | July 08, 2008 at 11:15 AM
Sign Bonds on the condition he becomes mute.
Posted by: icedrake523 | July 08, 2008 at 11:34 AM
An old, injury prone, lefthanded, terrible fielding OF???? He's exactly what the Mets need!! (sarcasm)
Xavier Nady makes the most sense; he'll cost less than Bay, and he's exactly what we need..
Posted by: Hyro | July 08, 2008 at 11:55 AM
Bonds is clearly a victim of collusion, there's a good dozen or so teams that could play him at DH or LF.
He OPS'd 1045 last year, and additionally he has had 3 months off with no injuries, so anyone saying "he's old", he would only be playing for 3 months, Im sure his durability would be better than it has been in years.
As of now, Bonds would add about 2-3 wins to ANY team, ones in pennant races would be absolutely idiotic not to sign him.....unless Selig has told all the owners not to.
Posted by: Athletic Domination | July 08, 2008 at 12:06 PM
"An old, injury prone, lefthanded, terrible fielding OF???? He's exactly what the Mets need!! (sarcasm)"
A big time, high level run produced that can absolutely mash and was as productive as A-Rod last year to play in a corner outfield spot for us???? He's exactly what the Mets need!! (Not Sarcasm, see how funny I am too!!)
Posted by: nrmax88 | July 08, 2008 at 01:28 PM
Giles is interesting. Only because he is realistic and he is somewhat valuable. That high OBP would be nice in the 2 hole. And while Endy has been filling in extremely well, he is not a starter and eventually will get exposed if he keeps getting run out there everyday. His defense is just ridiculous though. I might even go as far as too say he is the best defensive outfielder in baseball right now. He would win a gold glove at any outfield position if he played everyday. I like him better as a 4th OF getting a start or two a week, pinch running, and subbing on defense in the late innings.
I assume Holliday would need Martinez in a deal, which is a bad idea. I have also heard they(the Rox) would be interested in swapping Beltran for Holliday, though I would be about as interested in that trade as I am in acquiring genital herpes.
Jason Bay and the X-Man are also interesting because they are a team far off from winning and might not mind taking some low level young prospects. I heard something very interesting yesterday from Omar Minaya. Talking about CC Sabathia, he said he had spoken to Mark Shapiro, who told him that the Mets had players that Mark would have traded CC for. If you take this at face value, maybe the Met system isn't quite as awful as we thought. There are guys like Kunz, Niese, Parnell, Carp, Evans, Murphy closer to the top, but also have guys like Rustich, Moviel, Gee, Owen, and some other interesting guys a little bit lower. One extremely intriguing name to me is Wilmer Flores, a 6'3, 175 lb 16 year old Venezuelan shortstop signed last year. He is very young, but has just mashed to a tune of .354/.388/.646 for the Kingsport Mets, albeit in a small 80 AB sample size. Francisco Pena is another interesting guy only because he was hyped up and he is still so young, despite not really putting it together behind the plate.
Ibanez of course is interesting, as is Murton, they should both come cheap and while they dont stand out, they could both help out in LF for a team that is looking for a number 6 type of hitter. This Church situation is killing them. If they could ever get Alou back healthy and Church back healthy they could win the division going away.
Posted by: nrmax88 | July 08, 2008 at 01:50 PM
What the &$*@ is going on here!? If Alou and Church aren't healthy, how could Barry hurt the Mets? They're a contending team in desperate need of corner outfielding. No, you're right. I'd rather have Trot Nixon than Barry Bonds.
Posted by: fenderfanatic | July 08, 2008 at 02:15 PM
A player who has been mentioned as available but not connected (that I know of) with the Mets is Casey Blake of Cleveland.
He could platoon with Delgado and/or cover either OF corner while Alou and Church try to regain health.
I don't know what the Tribe would want that the Mets could afford but I think Blake should be considered as someone who would fit for the Amazins.
Posted by: dr4sight | July 08, 2008 at 02:29 PM
fenderfanatic, yes apparently the 2 runs a month the opponents would score from having Barry in LF is more important than the 70 trillion that would come from his bat.
Things are just so freaking illogical these days, its very depressing.
Posted by: Athletic Domination | July 08, 2008 at 02:54 PM
A.D. I think Fender was being sarcastic, and is for a Bonds signing for the Mets. And rightfully so.
Posted by: nrmax88 | July 08, 2008 at 03:12 PM
Well, I think the major reason the Mets are not interested in Barry is because of the unprecedented media circus signing him would create. They don't want to deal with that kind of headache.
Posted by: peter | July 08, 2008 at 03:13 PM
nrmax88, yes I was actually going along with his sarcasm, hence my "illogical" line.
Its extremely troubling to think about teams who are trying to trade actual prospects away and hurt their franchises in doing so for LF/DH-types when the best one ever is available, for free (He said he'd donate the prorated min salary he'd get to charity).
Seriously this is such crazy talk. Media circus? This isnt 1998, EgoBarry is done. Barry said he just wants to play the game and not talk about anything. I say every team should want that.
Posted by: Athletic Domination | July 08, 2008 at 03:30 PM
AD, the issue is not that Bonds himself would seek out media attention (on the contrary, it's something which he's always tried to avoid), the issue is that the New York media would be all over him. Every little gesture, smirk, or jab made by Bonds will be amplified and scrutinized in the media. The players will have to answer question after question about Bonds and what he has or hasn’t done. I have no doubt that Barry can handle the media storm- he always has - but whether the distractions will affect the other players is a legitimate question.
I’m not necessarily saying that the Mets should avoid Bonds. Obviously, his bat would be a huge lift to the lineup, especially if Church’s & Alou’s injury problems continue. But I don’t think you can deny the media circus would be a real problem.
Posted by: peter | July 08, 2008 at 04:17 PM
Gentlemen, don't forget that we're talking about the same team that blew a 7 game lead over the Phillies by losing 11 of their final 16 games last year. That's not a distraction? I haven't seen a bigger choke job since Linda Lovelace. The Mets need the boost from Bonds.
Posted by: fenderfanatic | July 08, 2008 at 04:50 PM