MLB Rumors - MLB Trade Rumors
Subscribe to MLB Trade Rumors using RSS
Home     Contact     About     Advertise     Archives     Widget     Twitter      RSS Usage

« Pavano Placed On Waivers | Main | Todd Jones' Tigers Career May Be Over »

Heyman Predicts '09 Options

THURSDAY: Reader Christopher G. alerted me to the fact that Smoltz will be a free agent after this season.  According to this MLB.com article, he has a vesting option for '09 based on pitching 200 innings in '08.  Obviously Smoltz is unable to reach that total.

WEDNESDAY: SI.com's Jon Heyman weighs in on 12 players with options for '09, speculating on whether they will be exercised.  Most of the dozen are easy to predict, except for John Smoltz at $12MM and Brad Penny at $9.25MM with a $2MM buyout.  Heyman sees both of those being picked up.

You can browse all of the options in our 2009 MLB free agents list.  Some players that Heyman did not discuss:

  • Rod Barajas ($2.5MM option, $0.5MM buyout) - He was awful in July, but overall he's had a solid offensive year.  They'll exercise it.
  • Hank Blalock ($6.2MM option, $0.25MM buyout) - Another lost year for Blalock, who is not capable of playing third base currently.  He's only 27, so figure the Rangers will try one more time to get value out of him.  Blalock was almost traded for Josh Beckett back in the day.
  • Cliff Floyd ($2.75MM option, $0.25MM buyout) - There's been some retirement chatter, but I see both sides wanting one more year.
  • Wily Mo Pena ($5MM club option or $2MM player option) - The club will decline, but Pena should exercise accept his option.  He had shoulder surgery in July and hopes to be ready for spring training.
  • Brian Giles ($9MM option, $3MM buyout) - This seems like an easy call to exercise, but there have been rumblings that the Padres might decline due to payroll concerns.
  • Tim Wakefield (perpetual $4MM option) - Easy call to exercise once again.
  • Salomon Torres ($3.75MM option, $0.3MM buyout) - Torres' surprising emergence as the Crew's best relief acquisition means he stays.
  • Tom Gordon ($4.5MM option, $1MM buyout) - If Gordon needs Tommy John surgery, this will be declined and then he may retire.
  • Damaso Marte ($6MM option, $0.25MM buyout) - At one point I might've said the Yanks would exercise this, choosing to pay extra for the short commitment.  But now it looks like he'll become a free agent.


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e200e5549548108834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Heyman Predicts '09 Options:

Comments

The Wakefield Option, it should be in the dictionary, its really original to baseball, what a guy. i do wonder how long he plans to continue on, if hes trying to set some kind of standard and pitch till hes 50, although those nagging injuries are starting to pile up year after year

Are these players with options, or players that teams have options on?

I disagree about Blalock. With all of the healthy infield options that the Rangers have, they might think it cheaper to cut Blalock loose and let another team try and deal with his degrading shoulder.

Yankees should exercise Marte's option.

I think the Yanks' will exercise Marte's option. Having him for one year at $6M is better than the alternatives, say Fuentes for 4/40 or Ohman at 3/12.

I thnk that at 6 million, he is kind of a bargian. But the Rangers don't need him, and if they want to add a pitcher and resign Bradley, they're going to need some money. I think they should pick up the option, then trade him to a team like the Twins for a spare part. Maybe they can get a high upside, poor performance guy like Phil Humber for Blalock. They're still dumping the salary, but they get a decent prospect in return.

I think the Dodgers should decline the option. Maddux would probably like a return, adn they are almost definatley going to sign a starter like Sabathia, Lowe, or Garland. If it is such a bargain for them, they can do the same thing by picking up his option and then trading him. I'd rather have Maddux at 10 million rather than Penny at 9.2 million.

Yanks should exercise Marte's option so they can put another good lefty in the "pen" for the next year.

IF BRian Fuentes gets 4/40 I'll poop all over the floor.

The Lackey and Guerrero options are no-brainers, however, the Angels would be stupid to bring back Garret Anderson, even at a lesser price.
If they resign Mark Teixeira, Kendry Morales could very easily slide into the LF/RF/DH role and give you the same amount of production, if not better. The same goes for Juan Rivera, who's shown that he's a valuable piece to the Angels.
Both players are younger, cheaper and better than Anderson. If you take sentimental value out of the equation, this should be a no-brainer as well.

I agree with you, the Angels shouldn't bring back Anderson with all these young prospects 'waiting in the wings' so to speak. However the odds of the Angels bringing him back for a lesser salary are very high based soley on the fact of what he has done for the organization. So whether you want him back or not he probably will be back as a sign of respect.

"Yanks should exercise Marte's option so they can put another good lefty in the "pen" for the next year."

Who is this good lefty you speak of cause it surely isn't Marte?

All club options except for Pena who has both.

I doubt that the Yankees have made a decision on either Marte or Giambi yet. If Marte were a righty, I'd say there would be no chance they'd pick up his option at $6MM. They have been looking for years for an effective lefty though and the bullpen could use at least one veteran ahead of Mo. He's been pretty ineffective as a Yankee but i think its been mostly do to a dead arm after pitching a multiple inning, 42 pitch appearance. If he's no more effective than he's been, they probably let him walk. If he pitches better (and he looked pretty good in his last appearance), they probably exercise the option.

Giambi is a tougher case. The option is clearly above market and will be bought out. I don't agree with Heyman though that it means they automatically let him walk and go after Texiera. The Yankees do need to get younger, but they need to get younger at the skill positions not at 1B. I don't see them wanting to commit to a long term expensive contract with Texeira when they are going to have to transition Posada to 1B or DH at some point before his contract runs out. They also have a young masher, Jesus Montero, in the low minors who is a catcher but may eventually out grow the position. I'd imagine they want to keep the position open a few years out and find a stopgap solution. If Giambi is willing to come back for a reasonable, one year contract, I think the Yankees would give it serious consideration. I don't really see a lot of other short term options that are a lot better than him.

Angels can bring back GA. As long as it is for a little cash and a back-up position. GA can still play and should go out as an Angel.

Giambi is interesting because the Yanks are far from a lock in the Tex sweepstakes. If Tex signs with the Angels who do the Yanks play at 1B? Posada most likely but does his bat (and broken down body) really play well at 1B?

Texas should definitely bring back Hank. Hope he is healthy and then flip him to a team that needs some pop out of 3rd base. Basically play it like the WS should have played the Crede situation.

Finally, Giles is the biggest no brainer of them all. Even if it's a sign and trade type situation. I know Giles has a limited NTC. I'm guessing that one of the 24 teams that aren't blocked would appreciate his services. Although it does look like he is now a 10/5 guy.

I completely disagree about bringing Blalock back. He hasn't been healthy or productive since 2005 so why would they waste 6 mil on a guy they HOPE is gonna be healthy. Plus too they're not even sure if he can consistently play 3rd base everyday. They have a 23 year old kid in Joaquin Arias who is ready and just waiting for a spot to play. If they let Hank walk then Arias can play and they have an extra 6 mil to pay towards a starting pitcher.

all halo to garret anderson
but reality is reality
if he wants to try somewhere else, let him (and welcome him back for the sweater ceremony)
but he's only a token angel from here on out

Does any know the details on Jim Thomes vesting option for '09?

Smoltz didn't pitch 200 innings = no option.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment


Top Stories



Search MLBTR

Lijit Search

MLBTR Features



Recent Posts


MLBTR Mailing List

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Rumors By Team



Monthly Archives


Live Chats


Tuesdays at 2 p.m. CST



Site Map     Contact     About     Advertise     Privacy Policy     Widget     Twitter     Rss Feed


MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com.