![]() |
|
|
| |
« Rosenthal's Latest: Holliday, Fuentes, Kotsay | Main | Dodgers In Market For Pitching »
Below I've collected more interesting remaining links regarding the amateur draft.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e200e553ef807b8833
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Post-Draft Roundup: Hosmer, Smoak, Strasburg:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
I'm curious about the comments concerning the Rangers and the slotting system with them going over slot substantially the last 2 drafts for several players
Posted by: laxtonto | August 18, 2008 at 11:21 AM
I doubt the Nats would avoid Strasburg due to signability issues. They missed out on Crow not because they weren't willing to go high enough but because the two sides didn't really start negotiating until the night of the deadline.
The Nats went over-slot for almost all of their high draft picks (rounds 2, 3, 4, 5 and 15). I don't think money's the main problem, I think it was that Aaron Crow was asking for $3 mil more than the #1 overall pick up until the last night.
Posted by: thehoagster07 | August 18, 2008 at 11:27 AM
But if Strasburg is repped by Boras, he probably won't want to talk until 11:45 on deadline day either.
Posted by: Tim Dierkes | August 18, 2008 at 11:32 AM
I didn't realize 6.2 was the largest signing bonus in history. Says the Posey articlle. If memory serves, didn't Travis Lee get 10 mil? I can't remember.
And I doubt that any team will be able to pass up on Strasberg. The guy's a beast, and any team that passes him up is gonna feel a Matt Bush esque moment. By the way if the nats keep on this path for the rest of the season, won't that mean they'll have 2 top 10 picks? Now how exactly is that fair?
Posted by: AriGoldisaG | August 18, 2008 at 11:34 AM
I'm definitely happy Smoak was signed.He'll probably competing for a spot next year,just not sure what will happen between him and Davis, if they both make it then what.Bradley is the DH, do we trade Davis for pitching during the meetings too?
Posted by: taarboy | August 18, 2008 at 11:50 AM
The Strasburg showdown is despicable and calls to mind why the NBA instituted the draft lottery. I fear clubs like the Nats, M's, and Padres will simply tank their way through the season's latter stages in an effort to secure that first selection. Call me jaded.
As for the Nats passing due to signability...? It seems unlikely now, with all the blowback they're getting as a result of the Crow non-signing, though I suppose anything is possible. After all, Strasburg is certain to garner one of the biggest bonuses ever handed out- if not THE biggest- and the club will have to be more cautious, lest they see history repeat itself. Furthermore, with a second top 10 pick next year- the latter having considerable leverage as a result of MLB rules for compensatory picks (if the Nats don't sign the pick next year, it doesn't carry over for a third year)- Washington's budget will already be stretched tight. In another year, I think that the Nats would likely go the cautious route- and I still believe they'll do so with their compensatory selection- but Strasburg is a special talent; one I can't see ANYONE passing up a chance to grab. It wouldn't simply amount to another PR nightmare, but could essentially bring down a franchise already struggling to stay afloat.
I'm sure Seattle and San Diego will be crossing their fingers...and worried they'll take matters into their own hands. When the prize for ineptitude exceeds the price, everyone loses.
Posted by: milehigh78 | August 18, 2008 at 11:53 AM
I think almost all sports need to do something to get rookie contracts down to reasonable levels. I can understand how Wilson feels, making less than a guy that has never put on a big league uniform before in his life.
The escalating rookie contracts in the majors is really going to hurt small market teams, who will eventually have to draft who they can afford rather than who's the best available at that slot. The first year players draft is beginning to sound a lot like a more organized free agent market
Posted by: Scottsdale01 | August 18, 2008 at 01:11 PM
Whoever wins (loses?) the number one pick will not pass on Strasburg. On all three teams, he could be a 4 or 5 starter right now.
Posted by: DraftInfo | August 18, 2008 at 01:11 PM
Well put, DraftInfo...except for one part: Strasburg would probably be a 2 or 3 on those three clubs right now.
Posted by: milehigh78 | August 18, 2008 at 01:26 PM
Im so sick of hearing people bitch and moan about how rookie make too much money. To damn bad, it is what it is. Being a stud in highschool/ college pays off for a guy, just like our parents always told us it would. The guy earned this money working his ass off in highschool and college to get to where he is, so now he is reaping his rewards. Why shouldn't they ask for more money? Baseball is making more money. How about NBA/NFL rookies? The top picks of those drafts get like 5x what Posey got in signing bonuses. Play better in college and you will make more money when you turn pro, just the same as play better in the pro's and you will make more money when you hit free agency. It is what it is.
Posted by: nrmax88 | August 18, 2008 at 03:13 PM
I have this gut feeling that the nats are going to do something splashy this offseason. apparently they were contenders for holliday at the deadline and tim reminded us not to rule them out should he be put on the market over the winter. i think if they have the chance they would pounce on both holliday and strasburg.
Posted by: jacklaf | August 18, 2008 at 04:32 PM
I think you have to remember that even if the Nats get two top 10 picks next year, they still have to sign those guys for huge money. It's unlikely the Nats could afford to sign two top ten talents unless they basicaly threw away the rest of their draft. And if they were to fail the sign that pick again next year, then they never get it back. So having those picks isn't really the advantage that it initially seems to be
Posted by: scribbletone | August 18, 2008 at 04:39 PM
"I didn't realize 6.2 was the largest signing bonus in history. Says the Posey articlle. If memory serves, didn't Travis Lee get 10 mil? I can't remember."
I looked this up. Lee was drafted by the Twins. They didn't make an offer within 15 days, and Lee was declared a free agent at that point.
The Diamondbacks then signed him to a 10M/4yr deal. So, technically, he wasn't signed as a draftee, but as a free agent.
I had forgotten about the whole scenario - it did ring a bell when I read about it on Wiki.
Posted by: kosmo @ www.ObservingCasually.com | August 19, 2008 at 09:24 AM