![]() |
|
|
| |
« Dodgers Will Let Beimel Leave | Main | Mark Teixeira Rumors: Saturday »
According to Anthony McCarron of the New York Daily News, the Yankees won't offer A.J. Burnett a five-year contract.
Ken Davidoff writes that Burnett's agent, Darek Brauneker, is confident that his client will sign a five-year deal somewhere.
McCarron talked to a source who said that "the Yankees are not ready to go five years." The source also said that the Red Sox are more interested in Mark Teixeira and Derek Lowe than Burnett.
The Blue Jays are still talking with Burnett, but they haven't yet offered him a deal.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e2010536107d06970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference A.J. Burnett Rumors: Saturday:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
Instead of trading for Peavy, why don't the Cubs go after Burnett? I don't like the 5 years offer, but 3 would make sense.
Posted by: Teddyballgame | November 22, 2008 at 09:24 AM
Dont the Cubs already have problems with payroll, while still needing LH RF?
I hope AJ ends up at Citi, for 4/70
Posted by: viktor06 | November 22, 2008 at 09:26 AM
While Burnett is insisting on a 5 year deal, obviously he will sign with the Cubs for just 3!!!
what a ridiculous post
Posted by: Adam | November 22, 2008 at 09:36 AM
did CC sign with the Yankees friday?
Posted by: alan | November 22, 2008 at 09:39 AM
Wouldn't it make more sense for the NL teams to sign Sheets rather than Burnett? Sheets is rumored to be asking for 2 or 3 years. Both are high risk, high return guys who are great when "on". The commitment to Sheets would be for less time.
I can see the Yanks and Sox going after Burnett over Sheets because Burnett has had success in the AL, more specifically the AL East.
Posted by: yankeegirl49 | November 22, 2008 at 09:44 AM
"
did CC sign with the Yankees friday?
Posted by: alan | November 22, 2008 at 09:39 AM
"
If he did... EVERYONE missed it... lol --- they're saying he won't sign anywhere until after T-giving...
Posted by: casper | November 22, 2008 at 10:05 AM
These reports are so inconsistent. Didn't an earlier report say that the Yanks initial offer to AJ was for 5 yrs/80? If not then what was it? I wouldn't mind the Yanks offer him 4 years/60 with innings/starts/awards incentives that could push it to $20 mil each year. I think AJ's people have to be realistic that his health is a concern with any team interested in signing him. In good faith I think they should jump at that offer.
But the bottom line is Wang and Joba are the only definites for nest year. CC is a must. If we can't get him then that would be a bad look for us and the rotaion. If we get CC but don't get AJ on a more realistic deal then I wonldn't be too upset.
Question though. If AJ does get a 5 year deal for someone then does that give Sheets the power to ask for guaranteed 4 or 5 as well? Does anyone think Sheets will sign before AJ?
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | November 22, 2008 at 10:34 AM
I think Burnett's camp is shooting for the moon and hoping to grab a star...
I wouldn't mind a 4/60 deal.. with incentives that automatically lock it in to a 5/75 or even a 5/80 deal..
But I would only like that as a fan if there were incentives he had to hit to get that 5th year guaranteed.. just in case his elbow decides to fall off..
Posted by: casper | November 22, 2008 at 10:58 AM
I'm really hoping LeBron James, who is good friends with CC, will help sell CC on coming to NY. On the other hand though, despite being a die hard Knicks fan I think I'd rather see LeBron stay in Cleveland...lol. I need at least one Cleveland team to be worth a damn if I'm stuck here.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | November 22, 2008 at 11:27 AM
are there any rumors about sheets? I feel like I haven't heard anything
Posted by: HardCoreYanksFan7 | November 22, 2008 at 11:58 AM
"But the bottom line is Wang and Joba are the only definites for nest year."
The only thing definite about Joba is that he will land on the DL and cannot be counted on to throw 30+ starts for the team. The kid has basically never thrown more than 100 professional innings, and you're marking him down as a definite?
Right now the Yankees rotation has one pitcher - Wang. That's it.
Posted by: 92-93 | November 22, 2008 at 12:03 PM
These reports are not very inconsistent. It was speculated that the Yankees were going to offer 5/80 for Burnett, but several subsequent reports have stated that they only going to do 4 years. Currently they haven't offered anything because AJ is insisting on 5 years. I completely agree that Ben Sheets is a better signing. I don't know why there hasn't been any buzz about him. If you could get Sheets for 3 years that would infinitely better than AJ for 5. Both are huge injury risks, but Sheets did pitch 198 innings this year. If he was injured early in 08 as opposed to sept/postseason, I think there would be a lot more buzz about him.
Posted by: garriscp | November 22, 2008 at 12:33 PM
I think people are worried about his arm.. AJ hasn't had any "tommy john" injuries.. Sheets has... Forearm trouble is one of the tell tale signs of tommy john.. MRI showing damage or not...
Pavano didn't show any signs of "structural damage" before his Tommy John surgery...
09/17/2008 0 days out Right forearm tightness, elbow pain
That's what is scaring teams.. I think once the other chips fall - he'll get a deal somewhere...
Posted by: casper | November 22, 2008 at 12:41 PM
"Right now the Yankees rotation has one pitcher - Wang. That's it."
Andy, Hughes and Kennedy (lol)
I read a few weeks ago Joba is starting in the bullpen again, haven't cared to check in on that though.
Posted by: Kenan and Kel | November 22, 2008 at 01:05 PM
no.. they're starting him in the rotation with an innings limit.. I think it was around 150-160 Innings.,
Posted by: casper | November 22, 2008 at 01:21 PM
Their is nothing wrong with offering a 5 year deal. You just have to have some other crap with it. Like, if he is hurt, he doesn't get paid for the length he is out. Or his contract gets cut in half the next year, if he gets hurt in that current year.
Posted by: BravesRed | November 22, 2008 at 01:32 PM
so Joba gets injured in the middle of the year while being rushed to be a starter and he cant be reliable starter. Yeah, that makes perfect sense.
Posted by: yankfan1 | November 22, 2008 at 01:35 PM
How do you figure he's being rushed to be a starter. The Yanks said over a month ago that he would start the season as a starter. The guy pitched 132 inning in 07 when the Yanks were being careful with him. I think starting him from the begining and being watchful over his innings and skipping him ever so often is the right idea. This kid has electric stuff and 4 plus pitches. I would have a guy like a Roger Clemens (a retire power pitcher) work with him during the off season/spring training to make sure he uses his lower body more to keep from using his arm as much. CC is a perfect example of a big body guy who uses his frame not his arm to throw the way he does.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | November 22, 2008 at 01:42 PM
"so Joba gets injured in the middle of the year while being rushed to be a starter and he cant be reliable starter. Yeah, that makes perfect sense."
I read that Joba has never crossed the 130 inning mark, at Nebraska, in the minors and in the bigs. Never topped 130 innings in a season.
Combine that with the injury concerns which accelerated his drop in the first round, and you've got plenty of data to support the argument Joba is not a dependable starter. Maybe he will one day become just that but it's certainly reasonable to argue that he currently is not...nor ever has been.
Posted by: Kenan and Kel | November 22, 2008 at 01:54 PM
2008 Chamberlain threw 100 1/3 innings, in 2007 he threw 24 innings..
I don't think it's a rush. I think if they limit him to 130-150 innings this year that'd be fine... I am not really worried about his arm YET.. that shoulder injury last year wasn't in a "bad spot".. not where big injuries come from.. but if he had something like forearm tightening or tendinitis.. then i'd be worried.
Posted by: casper | November 22, 2008 at 02:01 PM
Joba's not a starter. His arm (at least at this stage) cant take throwing 97-101mph during a game. The only guy who's ever thrown as hard as Joba, started, remained a starter and been successful, is Randy Johnson, second on the all time strikeout list. Joba is NOT Randy Johnson. Joba is a reliever with an electric fastball and hard breaking slider that would be much more effective after being set up by a Wang or Pettite. Even Jorge Posada said it. Get 100 innings out of the pen from him and be happy with it. I dont see why every pitcher who's got good stuff is assumed to be a starter.
Posted by: Santana/Beckett FTW | November 22, 2008 at 02:06 PM
not during a game*
Starting a game
Posted by: Santana/Beckett FTW | November 22, 2008 at 02:06 PM
Santana -- I for the most part agree with you. I would rather see Joba being groomed for Rivera's job.. but, at this stage also they're in need of rotation help... see if he can handle it... if not, then put him back in the pen..
You can you a few examples for both ways... I mean look at Gagne... he was incredible for 2-3 years.. that was it.. so his arm is going to be able to take it or not... regardless of a pen, or starters role...
Posted by: casper | November 22, 2008 at 02:08 PM
Not to mention Mo is gettin to that age. Still throwing great, but Joba would be a great closer to follow in his footsteps.
Posted by: Santana/Beckett FTW | November 22, 2008 at 02:09 PM
Phil Hughes by the way should not be relied on to be a starter right off the bat next year also. I think he should be groomed in SWB and called back up maybe a month or two in. You need to secure a 5th starter thats not Kennedy/Hughes. As far as kennedy goes i dont think he's ever going to make it at the majors level and i've been saying it since watching him play minors ball. He doesn't have enough pop to his fastball, and he doesn't have the control that Tom Glavine or Mike Mussina does to work around that. I dont see him being effective at least in the rotation, most likely at all. Hughes is still a kid. Don't bring him in immediately expecting him to perform. You are going to bring down his confidence when he gets hammered his first or second game and then you are going to have a repeat of last year. Let him work out some mechanics and get his confidence up in Triple-A.
Suggestions? Someone like a Paul Byrd to fill that spot. Just someone who will give you a few good starts until Hughes is ready.
Posted by: Santana/Beckett FTW | November 22, 2008 at 02:15 PM
I would like to see Aceves with a shot.. that guy pitched well enough to earn a shot...
As far as Kennedy, after watching him pitch in the majors live... His "stuff" isn't bad AT ALL... and while I don't agree with you that he'll never make it at the ML level... I think he will just not with a big market team.. I think he's a bit fragile upstairs for it.
Posted by: casper | November 22, 2008 at 02:19 PM
well that too. what stuff? are we referring to? His 88-89mph flat fastball? Sure he's gone nice break on his breaking pitches, but doesn't make a bit of difference if you dont control them and keep them down in the zone. Kennedy still cant seem to keep the ball below the batters waist, let alone at the knees.
Posted by: Santana/Beckett FTW | November 22, 2008 at 02:27 PM
Aceves I like alot more for the majors immediately than hughes or kennedy.
Posted by: Santana/Beckett FTW | November 22, 2008 at 02:30 PM
I think having Joba as a set up guy for the next 3 years is a waste. He's always been a starter. As long as the Yanks limit him to a 150 innings then I think he;ll be fine.
The Yanks already have a possible replacement for Rivera in Mark Melancon (missed all of 07 due to tj surgery). He was set to be a 1st rnd pick but dropped down to the 9th rnd because he needed surgery. The Yanks knew he would bounce back and last year he blew thru A, AA and AAA w/ combined totals of 8-1 in 44 games, 89 so's in 95 innings w/ a 2.27 era.
The scouting report on Melancon is above-average fastball with command , a power curve that some in the organization equate as an out pitch to Chamberlain's slider and an ability to hide the ball in his delivery. However, what every Yankees official cites as Melancon's greatest asset is a serious, professional, determined makeup.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | November 22, 2008 at 02:59 PM
If Joba starts, at 150 innings will be an average of 5 innings per game if he starts 30 games. The Yankees bullpen will never get a rest with him starting. So, let him start.
Posted by: BravesRed | November 22, 2008 at 03:04 PM
The fact that Kennedy is lights out in the minors but struggled in the bigs makes me feel like it's more his nerves than anything else. He should start the season in AAA and be the 1st to come if there's a need. This is what I think the staff should be provided that we sign CC and one other guy.
CC
Wang
Burnett/Perez/Sheets
Joba
Pettite
Hughes (6th starter to rest Joba. Can get 10-15 starts. Long relief guy. he can rack up 130 innings w/ less pressure. If he succeeds then he becomes a starter in 2010 and replaces Pettite).
Mariano (closer)
Bruney (set up)
Marte (lefty set up)
Coke (lefty specialist)
Ramirez
Robertson
Minors waiting: Melancon (bullpen callup), Aceves (rotation callup), Kennedy (rotation call up).
A sign has be sent to all rookies that the Yanks will give you a shot but that you have to make the most of it when a spot is available.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | November 22, 2008 at 03:12 PM
Kennedy has good stuff and knows how to pitch.. it's just last year he just kinda nibbled, got behind and anyone in the majors can hit a fastball when they know it's coming...
If Kennedy can keep it down and just attack hitters with an actual gameplan then he'd be fine... Like I said, I think Kennedy would do well on another team...
Posted by: casper | November 22, 2008 at 09:09 PM
okay whoever thinks that the yankees sign two pitchers with injury problems (burnett sheets) are very stupid. they did that in the past and it failed(pavano, wright) yes when sheets is healthy he is very good, so is burnett. you want a guy for a lot of innings like cc. lowe isnt aposibility becuase u cnt have 2 sinkerball pitchers pitch in the same series. it just doent work
Posted by: soxsucketh33 | November 23, 2008 at 11:37 AM