MLB Rumors - MLB Trade Rumors
Subscribe to MLB Trade Rumors using RSS
Home     Contact     About     Advertise     Archives     Widget     Twitter      RSS Usage

« Phillies Interested In Hermida | Main | Red Sox Sign McAnulty »

Heilman Wants Starting Job Or Trade

Same old story with Aaron Heilman - the Mets pitcher wants a starting job or a trade according to Adam Rubin of the New York Daily News.  Rubin says not to fault Heilman for his preference - the pitcher only addresses the situation when asked, and his agent provided the quotes for the story.

The Mets simply don't want to try Heilman as a starter, and haven't for some time.  He's under team control for two more years, and they're divided on whether to trade him.  Rubin says at least six teams are intrigued, the Rockies included.  We've also seen the A's, Rays, Rangers, Cardinals, Cubs, and D'Backs linked to Heilman at various points.


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e201053603c1cd970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Heilman Wants Starting Job Or Trade:

Comments

with the numbers he put up last year, not only should the mets trade, but he should be lucky his butt could find a seat on the bench

Yeah, give me a break. I'm sick of this guy, get him out of here. He has the nerve, after that season, to demand anything? Trade his *ss right now

make a trade to the marlins or the rangers, they are rich with prospects and could use the starting pitching, im sure his numbers wont be as bad as they were, but the mets dont need to take the chance, the rangers and the marlins have some wiggle room for trying him out though

i think the mets should give him a chance as a starter. if we trade him now we are not going to get anything and everyone knows he is good when he is on. It's the Mets fault that they tried to make him into a reliever. they should of gave him more chances like they did with Pelf. i still think he could be a great starter

Some guys can pitch out of the pen and some guys cant. Imagine youre a pitcher and all you want to do is start but your team puts you in the pen and says "wait for your shot at starting" and it never comes.

Its a completely different mentality to come out of the pen and its really had to do a great job when you hate your role.

I say if all he is going to do is sulk and pitch poorly out of the pen, trade him somewhere out of the division so that if he catches fire, they wont have to deal with him.

However his stock wont be very high based on his poor performance last season. Personally I think he has the potential to be a great starter.

He had his chance to start way back in 03. He blew it. They moved him to the pen, where he was able to put together several years of productive pitching. Until last year, when he again blew it. Now he is complaining? He is lucky that he is making 1000x more money than I am.

Adam Kennedy straight up for Heilman. All I'm sayin' is I'm just saying...

Was very unlucky last year, still a great pitcher. Would love to bring him into Wrig.

He should be a man and accept that his role (considering he's a 2 pitch pitcher) is out of the bullpen. Instead, he sulks like a baby. I'm sick and tired of watching this guy blow big game after big game.

WAAAAAAAAH!

Trade this guy...Im tired of seeing him pout on the mound whenever someone gets on base

DJ_Kurioo have you seen heilman pitch more than 10 times. He doenst have a reliable third pitch. He can make it once through a lineup but after that he will get smacked around. Sure if he had a 98mph heater maybe he could start and just overpower hitters. If he wants to start great, it is just not happening on the Met's. Huston Street would be a fantastic addition to the mets if they wanted to trade him in a deal involving Heilman. I believe most Met fans would be ecstatic.

As a Cardinals fan, I'd love to see Aaron pitch for us next year. I think he has great potential and just needs a change of scenery. Duncan could fix him. What do you want, Mets fans?

Maybe if you had an ERA under 4, more than 2 pitches decent pitches (his slider is a beach ball), and didn't implode with men on base you would have a chance at starting.

04Forever: While the Rangers could give him a shot the Marlins have no room for him even if he wasn't arbitration eligible. The Fish already have a pretty strong rotation with a number of young prospects waiting in the wings Heilman would have a tougher time starting there then with the Mets. Also it doesn't really matter whether or not the team that trades for him has a good system or not, Heilman is not worth a top prospect regardless.

Mets are looking for relievers that have experience closing, or just good young players in general. I think the most likely deal is Heilman and a prospect for Huston Street. Heilman would start for Colorado, and the Mets would get some bullpen help.

heilman can rot as far as i'm concerned. hey aaron, how about you cut down on the gopherballs and then you have something of merit to complain about. the mets can't get rid of him soon enough.

I truly doubt that any team interested in trading for Heilman is thinking of using him as a starter.

Ryan ludwick..haha

"He had his chance to start way back in 03. He blew it"

So every rookie in the history of baseball has to be amazing in their 1st season?

How many pitchers over the years have struggled through the first couple of seasons and then ended up going on to great careers as starters.

A change of scenery is needed forsure.

Here's one... Royals trade John Buck and Jose Guillen to the Mets for Heilman and Castillo. could sub Teahen for Guillen, but that eliminates the headache/headache side of the deal.

I would love guillen and buck. But castillo though I believe will not repeat his atrocious 08 cannot be counted on to play even a 120 games next year.

I wouldn't mind seeing the Tribe pick this cat up. We could use a #3 or #4 starter, so we aren't relying so much on Reyes/Laffey/Sowers/Huff/Lewis. I suspect it would take much to get him, so yeah, that's Shapiro's kind of guy.

"So every rookie in the history of baseball has to be amazing in their 1st season?

How many pitchers over the years have struggled through the first couple of seasons and then ended up going on to great careers as starters.

A change of scenery is needed forsure."

Plenty have struggled, and plenty have come back to be great starters. But Heilman is not one of them.

Not sure why the Rockies would be interested. I would rather take my chances with Smith and De La Rosa at the back of the rotation.

""He had his chance to start way back in 03. He blew it"

So every rookie in the history of baseball has to be amazing in their 1st season?"

Heilman was given 25 starts over 03-05, he put up a 5.97 ERA in that span. You really blame the Mets for turning that into a Reliever?

Sure, it's possible he goes to greener pastures and the light clicks and he's a pretty good mid-rotation starter. But I don't think anyone can fault the Mets for keeping him in the bullpen when he was awful in the rotation, and very good as a reliever (Up until last season).

Considering Heilman's lower value, I would think they would rather package him as part of a deal for a bigger prize then deal him on his own.

Not that I want him, but Kenny Williams is good at finding guys who need a change of scenery. I just dont think the cell would work out for him.

Mets are looking for relievers that have experience closing, or just good young players in general. I think the most likely deal is Heilman and a prospect for Huston Street. Heilman would start for Colorado, and the Mets would get some bullpen help.


Only if that prospect is F-Mart. Otherwise this trade is way off base.

Here's one... Royals trade John Buck and Jose Guillen to the Mets for Heilman and Castillo. could sub Teahen for Guillen, but that eliminates the headache/headache side of the deal.

Exactly why would the Royals do this? Do they have a need for 2nd baseman with no cartilige in his knees and who will miss 80 games a year and be paid 8 million per year for the next 3?

Do they need an emotionally spent reliever who whines about starting when he's lucky to have a job?

If this trade ever happened I'll be waiting for the Adam Eaton for Albert Pujols trade because that would be next.

"Not that I want him, but Kenny Williams is good at finding guys who need a change of scenery. I just dont think the cell would work out for him."

Maybe they could teach him a splitter though. Look what that did for John Danks.

I would be surprised if another team wasn't willing to give up an average prospect for the chance to see what Heilman can do. He's got some good stuff, and he really seems capable of being at least a good 4/5 starter at a fairly cheap rate.

"Heilman was given 25 starts over 03-05, he put up a 5.97 ERA in that span. You really blame the Mets for turning that into a Reliever?"

I do agree that it's tough to blame New York for making him a reliever though. He had good stuff but really seemed to struggle as a starter. I think a change of scenary is pretty necessary for him now, considering how he pitched in 2008.

"Mets are looking for relievers that have experience closing, or just good young players in general. I think the most likely deal is Heilman and a prospect for Huston Street. Heilman would start for Colorado, and the Mets would get some bullpen help.

Only if that prospect is F-Mart. Otherwise this trade is way off base."

That's simply untrue. Huston Street's value has plummeted. I think if the Mets offered something like Heilman and Tejeda or maybe Pena, the Rockies would think about it.

im a huge mets fan and i personally would love to get edwin jackson for heilman and a lower tier prospect

"im a huge mets fan and i personally would love to get edwin jackson for heilman and a lower tier prospect"

The Rays could assuredly get more from somewhere else.

What about Jackson and Fernando Perez for Heilman, Terry Evans, and Eddie Kunz?

yes id do that

Mets fans, relief pitching is notoriously unpredictable from year to year. Heilman had a bad year in '08 but you seem to be forgetting that he was pretty good the three previous years. Trade him away if you want but that's just one more hole you're going to have to fill, unless you think he fell off the cliff physically at age 29 and will never be the same again.

I wouldn't mind seeing him in the Cubs bullpen but if he's going to insist on starting with only two pitches he's going to be a problem and will end up in Lou's doghouse faster than Stevie Eyre did. If Heilman will accept being in the pen then I'm for it.

trade him now... There are teams out there still willing to trade for him. after another yr with the mets he not going to have any value at all and they proably would just cut him. So just get something now

"I wouldn't mind seeing him in the Cubs bullpen but if he's going to insist on starting with only two pitches he's going to be a problem and will end up in Lou's doghouse faster than Stevie Eyre did. If Heilman will accept being in the pen then I'm for it."

I'd like him on the Cubs too, but in a bullpen role. That'd give them some serious power arms with Marmol, Shark, Gregg and Guzman.

And it's Scott Eyre.

"As a Cardinals fan, I'd love to see Aaron pitch for us next year. I think he has great potential and just needs a change of scenery. Duncan could fix him. What do you want, Mets fans?"

What's sad is I 100% agree with you. Duncan has "fixed" pitchers who seemed much further gone than Heilman. He never lost his velocity or differential with the changeup. What I saw (mind you this is not from any PFX data, just watching him pitch) was that he lost the sink on his fastball. It became a flat, running two seamer. Some pitchers can get away with that, but not pitchers who rely on the change as much as Heilman. All of a sudden, hitters were recognizing the changeup A LOT sooner, and if it was in anything close to a bad spot, it would get clubbed.

It looked to me like the raw ability was still there, and there's some value in that (especially if Dave Duncan is your pitching coach). But in all likelihood, he's done as a Met. His mentality for NY was in question before he fell apart, but it'll be awful hard to get his confidence back with 40,000 fans booing him every time he takes the mound. The Mets should have cashed in while his value was higher, they didn't, and its going to cost them in the return they get now.

As for whether he should start or relieve, it was my impression that it had less to do with his ineffectiveness as a starter and more to do with his delivery. He has a longish delivery with lots of moving parts, and he loads his elbow above his shoulder, which generates added stresses on the arm. The more well known case of a pitcher getting hurt from a similar mechanical "hitch" is Mark Prior. The Mets didn't want to risk putting Heilman through 150-200 innings a year. I would love it if they changed their tune on this, and maybe there's some chance they will now, but in all likelihood, he'll need to be in a different organization if he wants to start games.

"He should be a man and accept that his role (considering he's a 2 pitch pitcher) is out of the bullpen. Instead, he sulks like a baby. I'm sick and tired of watching this guy blow big game after big game."

Met fans are some of the most moronic people in the world. They are like one small step above monkeys. You all make me sick. Metzfan22, John Maine is a 2 pitch pitcher. Johan Santana is a 3 pitch pitcher that only throws 2 pitches, his slider is garbage. Mike Pelfrey throws one pitch. Oliver Perez throws 2 pitches. So don't give me some BS about how he only throws 2 pitches. Heilman throws more pitches then anybody the Mets had in their rotation. A 2 seamer, a 4 seamer, a changeup, and a slider. He has been solid for 3 years and after an injury plagued year we want to dump him for whatever we can get? Man you people are ignorant. These stupid Met fans act as arrogant and demanding as Yankee fans, without the 26 world series. You treat out players like crap and then wonder why star players want nothing to do with NY. Met fans have this sense of entitlement for absolutely no reason and it is just sickening. Most of the Met fan population are complete idiots. It takes fans of other teams to come up with the best plans for our players. Pretty sad.

"Huston Street would be a fantastic addition to the mets if they wanted to trade him in a deal involving Heilman. I believe most Met fans would be ecstatic."

Yeah well, most Met fans are among the most ignorant human beings to ever walk the earth, so I would take that with a grain of salt.

"Mets are looking for relievers that have experience closing, or just good young players in general. I think the most likely deal is Heilman and a prospect for Huston Street. Heilman would start for Colorado, and the Mets would get some bullpen help.


Only if that prospect is F-Mart. Otherwise this trade is way off base."

The idea that a marginal relief pitcher like Huston Street could net Fernando Martinez is pure hilarity. I wouldn't give up Heilman straight up for Street.

philswschamps... i lost some serious respect for your credibility with some of the trash you posted here today. Jose Guillen and John Buck both suck. Comparing Heilman for Guillen to Eaton for Pujols is something very, very ignorant.

I just do not see a purpose to that Royals trade on KC's end either, but obviously philswschamps was just saying how the trade was out of question with the remark. Which is true, the Royals would want no part. As for a trade market for Heilman, I have heard rumors of Colorado, Texas and maybe the Rays were interested at one point (might depend on whether he is relief or SP for them). If I was Omar, I would START with Heilman for Street or Heilman for Edwin Jackson/Sonnanstine... and see how much more it would take for each. Maybe something like Heilman, Evans, Parnell/Niece or prospect would be close for Street and or one of the two from Tampa? I am not sure his real trade value or what other teams think exactly. Anyone think Heilman/Evans/and prospect could get one of those two deals done?

How about to get rid of Jose Guillens contract? Met fans are funny. They whine and groan and complain about bad contracts, then they want to go get a guy like Jose Guillen? Ugh. It is not even a Heilman thing. It is the way we look at players in general. If NY fans are so intelligent and all that, then why are they so stupid that they can't get past one season? With any player, it seems like the last season they played is all that mattered. People treat Xavier Nady like some star player. You have all these idiots complaining that..."OMG... Swisher hit .219!!! Cashman is a moron!!!!"

If David Wright posts a .280/.360/.490 line next year people will be ready to trade him away Joe Crede. Do the 3 years Heilman (or any other player) posted before an injury plagued down season mean anything to anybody? Obviously not. Sell Low baby, and Buy high.

To be fair nrmax, I think while Mets fandom includes lots of ignorance, it also includes some of the most well educated and articulate baseball fans in the world. Its not all internet trolls. The sense of entitlement has become overwhelming the last few years, but there are still plenty of Mets fans who would rather have an interesting, analytical baseball conversation than pontificate unreasonable and unfair scenarios.

And I do get where the anger comes from with Heilman. Statistically, the guy was an absolute workhorse for three years. No doubt about it. But he's been heavily relied upon for four years now, to play a very important role on the team, and in each of the last three years he has been a big let down when the season was on the line. 2006 was easy enough to forgive, there were plenty of other more responsible goats in that series. Then in 2007, he's giving up game winning HR to Pat Burrell at Shea in September. Okay, even that I can forgive, seeing as how otherwise he arguably had his best statistical season. But those two cases (along with a few others) made watching him struggle so mightily that much more frustrating to watch in 2008.

And while this may not be fair in a sense, his body language is atrocious. He LOOKS mopey on the mound, sometimes even when he's pitching well! I think that's where the "crybaby" misrepresentation comes from.

I'm not saying he's a valueless pitcher, but so much went wrong for him in a Mets uniform. Selling low is probably a big mistake, but giving him less responsibility and giving yourself other options for the late innings is a must. I wouldn't even mind if he had a shot at the rotation, but its just not going to happen.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment


Top Stories



Search MLBTR

Lijit Search

MLBTR Features



Recent Posts


MLBTR Mailing List

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Rumors By Team



Monthly Archives


Live Chats


Tuesdays at 2 p.m. CST



Site Map     Contact     About     Advertise     Privacy Policy     Widget     Twitter     Rss Feed


MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com.