![]() |
|
|
| |
« Matt Holliday Rumors: Thursday | Main | Phillies Rumors: Baldelli, Hairston, Mench »
5:18pm: More on the Mets: Ken Davidoff says they're shopping Aaron Heilman, Scott Schoeneweis, and Pedro Feliciano. The A's, Rays, and Rangers are fans of Heilman. The Rockies, Cardinals, Cubs, and D'Backs were also tossed into the mix by Adam Rubin, though the D'Backs haven't had recent talks. The Mets would be willing to pick up some of the $3.6MM owed to Schoeneweis next year.
4:58pm: Brian Fuentes' agent Rick Thurman calls the below rumor of an offer to the Mets a "total fabrication."
10:56am: Checking in on the Mets...
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e2010535de50d6970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Mets Rumors: Fuentes, Cordero, Delgado:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
Isn't it too early for other teams to be talking dollars with free agents?
Posted by: Dave | November 06, 2008 at 11:00 AM
"Isn't it too early for other teams to be talking dollars with free agents?"
That's what I thought. Maybe someone can shed light on how this is legal.
Posted by: mkorpal | November 06, 2008 at 11:03 AM
"Isn't it too early for other teams to be talking dollars with free agents?"
I don't believe so. Even if it isn't, the agent proposed it which is probably fine.
Posted by: icedrake523 | November 06, 2008 at 11:12 AM
They aren't talking dollars if you read the article. Dempster's agent is simply trying to drive up the price by making it clear he would be comfortable in New York, a team that would probably be willing to try Dempster for 4/50 or at the very least 4/48. It's all strategy for the agents at this point.
I believe the exclusive negotiations end on the 14th of this month, but I may be a day off.
Posted by: Bdlugz | November 06, 2008 at 11:14 AM
The article pretty much says the agent put a proposal on their table. My understanding is the two parties can't talk dollars, only 'non-salary issues' during the exclusive negotiating period after the world series. It certainly seems a breach if the Mets and Fuentes are talking money already.
Posted by: Dave | November 06, 2008 at 11:28 AM
Which means the article isn't credit-worthy or there are ethical issues being breached.
Posted by: Dave | November 06, 2008 at 11:29 AM
Free agent can lay out dollar demands to gm's prior to november 14th, gm's can't respond until that date.
Posted by: SkiBolton | November 06, 2008 at 11:42 AM
If this is true (which I'm not exactly believing at this point), 4/44 for a closer was ridiculous when Francisco Cordero got even more money than that and it's ridiculous now with Fuentes.
Posted by: MattyMets | November 06, 2008 at 11:43 AM
"Which means the article isn't credit-worthy or there are ethical issues being breached"
Or it just means that, while teams are not supposed to officially talk numbers, it doesn't mean something can't be whispered, and it doesn't mean that every team doesn't do this every year.
Posted by: nrmax88 | November 06, 2008 at 12:48 PM
I think Chad Cordero will be a Met. Now I dont know if he will be brought in as the closer though so that could make him go elsewhere. But I think Minaya likes him a lot and will try hard to bring him in here.
Posted by: metsfan99 | November 06, 2008 at 12:51 PM
I don't think it's reasonable to trust a guy coming off shoulder surgery to eat up important innings. I would love to see them give Cordero a shot, if he bounces back he can probably earn a spot bridging to Fuentes, Putz, Street or whoever they actually bring in for the 9th inning.
Posted by: ChicoWalker | November 06, 2008 at 12:54 PM
Agreed. Sign Chad. Sign Cruz. Sign Affeldt. Sign Ayala. Boom.
Posted by: nrmax88 | November 06, 2008 at 12:55 PM
Screw the 9th inning. Sign those 4 guys, probably for around 12 or 13 million for all of them for 2009, sign Manny. Resign Ollie. Let Heilman/Niese fight for the 5th spot.
SS Reyes
CF Beltran
LF Manny
1B Delgado
3B Wright
2B Murphy
RF Church/Tatis
C Schneider/Ramon
SP Johan
SP Pelfrey
SP Ollie
SP Maine
SP Niese/Heilman
BP Cruz
BP Affeldt
BP Ayala
BP Cordero
BP Show
BP Smith
BP Duaner
Posted by: nrmax88 | November 06, 2008 at 12:58 PM
I know that it's anathema to suggest that a closer might be important...so let's go a different route. The Mets aren't going to go into next year with Cruz, Affeldt and Ayala as the big 3 in their bullpen. Forget whether or not they should, they just won't. Minaya is going to go out and spend on a closer, that might be Fuentes, Putz, KROD...maybe Street, who knows. Taking that into account, I would like them to try to bring in a guy that has a chance to be trully dominant, like Putz. The other options are all quality bullpen arms, but Putz has a chance to be a mariano/pappelbon type guy.
Posted by: ChicoWalker | November 06, 2008 at 03:07 PM
The Cardinals need help in their bullpen. If they have a chance to sign Fuentes, do it. Being conservative and not being agressive is what the Cardinals have done since Walt Jocketty left, it's time to start making some moves so we can be a contender again.
Posted by: kevinj | November 06, 2008 at 03:11 PM
"The Cardinals need help in their bullpen. If they have a chance to sign Fuentes, do it. Being conservative and not being agressive is what the Cardinals have done since Walt Jocketty left, it's time to start making some moves so we can be a contender again."
Give Chris Perez the job, and add a solid lefty reliever not named Fuentes. Aggressiveness is good, when its called for. Sometimes it isn't (see Haren, Dan).
Posted by: melonis rex | November 06, 2008 at 03:19 PM
Giving Fuentes more than 2 years would be a dumb move for the Cards especially when Perez should be ready to take over the closing role soon.
Posted by: Cardsfan387 | November 06, 2008 at 03:23 PM
Juan Cruz can be pretty dominating. He definitely has the ability to close, I'd rather take a chance on him and Affeldt producing , along with Ayala and a Chad Cordero, who you could sign for less money then K-Rod combined. I'd also rather take the gamble that Cruz performs well enough that we don't have to trade any more of our already questionable farm to get a guy like Putz, who, while having great upside, is going to become very expensive very soon and has a recent injury history. If the Mets only needed a closer, then I would agree with you. But they need 3 or 4 solid bullpen arms out there, and I would rather have that then one guy who comes with a 'closer' tag.
Posted by: nrmax88 | November 06, 2008 at 03:31 PM
I mean, the only reason Street or Putz are closers is because they eventually were given a shot to close. What makes Juan Cruz a less viable option the Street or Putz right now? As of right now, Street isn't even a closer. He is available because the Beane knows other pitchers with good stuff can close but because Street is a 'closer', somebody will pay out the ass for him. Juan Cruz is just as likely to have success closing ballgames as Huston Street is, the only difference is that you don;t have to worry about Billy Beane finding gems in your farm system and making you look bad in the process. You just pay the guy, and pay him a fraction of what K-Rod or Fuentes will cost.
Posted by: nrmax88 | November 06, 2008 at 03:36 PM
Opinion...I feel these are realistic.
1) Package Heilman/Evans/fill in blank for Sonnanstine
2) Trade Castillo straight up for Andruw Jones (They patch in Castillo for Kent at 2nd and we eat the last year of Jones's deal/ any production in LF a bonus)
3)Sign Hudson, K-rod, Affeldt
4)Optional - Trade Delgado for hard throwing bullpen help.
Since listing roster is popular...Lineup
1. Reyes
2. Hudson
3. Beltran
4. Wright
5. Delgado(if kept)/Murphy
6. Andruw Jones
7. Church
8. Schneider
Pitching
1. Johan
2. Pelfrey
3. Maine
4. Sonnanstine
5. Niece?
Pen
RP-K-rod
RP-Affeldt
RP-Joe Smith
RP-Parnell
RP-Kunz
RP-Felicano
This is not a strict outline, maybe more of a proposed start with work to do. Does anyone agree/disagree with these moves or particular parts of it? Opinions...
Posted by: MrMet | November 06, 2008 at 03:47 PM
Mr. Mets-
That leaves a decent bullpen with a huge downgrade in the rotation and a downgrade in the offense.
Terrible, terrible plan.
Posted by: supermets | November 06, 2008 at 04:34 PM
i think the dodgers should make a decent offer for cordero, hes a hometown kid. i watched him pitch for fullerton, he pitches with a bulldog mentality. i dont think saito is coming back, from what i heard/read he needs tommy john, i love saito but i doubt hes got anything left. then if the dodgers sign manram they should throw one of the heavy dollar short year deals at sheets. just for the simple fact if he can go 6 the pen will pick him up.
i know they have no chance cause the mets need him more than the dodgers, cordero i mean.
Posted by: 661dodgerblue | November 06, 2008 at 05:38 PM
oh mr met
yeah give us castillo please.
Posted by: 661dodgerblue | November 06, 2008 at 05:43 PM
Duly Noted supermets, though I was curious on opinions and have to respectfully disagree somewhat. The rotation would take a "huge downgrade", in what sense? Sonnanstine for Ollie is more or less the only difference, and Sonnanstine may be more consistent. That could not qualify as a "huge downgrade". Secondly, the offense would be similar but with Hudson full time over Castillo/A. Reyes (upgrade), a healthy Church all season barring injury (upgrade) and I should have listed Andruw Jones/Murphy/Tatis platoon in LF (that would be the case most likely in what I listed - I consider that an upgrade to last season). I appreciate opinion, that is what I wanted to get, but I was not shown great evidence against it. Another SP or LF would be great (insert Maggs, Swisher, Soriano, Manny...the wishlist goes on) but as stated, that is merely a start and not a finished product.
Side Note:as for 661dodgerblue, I can only laugh, that may have been a stretch proposal. Just an idea, both are not doing much of anything for their current teams. Agreed he does not bring much to the table.
Posted by: MrMet | November 06, 2008 at 05:53 PM
CONSIDER ME SHOCKED! The met-inos like Fuentes, Cordero, Delgado but want to shop Aaron Heilman and Scott Schoeneweis.....i didnt see that coming.
Posted by: clarknaddison | November 06, 2008 at 05:56 PM
Too bad they also want to shop Feliciano. Stop posting all your racist comments and don't leave out facts just to fit your racist argument that is wrong.
Posted by: tinski | November 06, 2008 at 06:06 PM
i think jones has to have something in the tank still. i mean two years ago he was playing for the hof, and now hes lucky if he will get 200 abs next year. he needs to come out in ST and hit frozen ropes 70 percent of the time to get on the 25 man roster. he strikes out like 70 percent of the time, its gonna be a challenge
lol mr met
i wish that would happen so bad. i know a few of us dodger fans wanted to delwyn young play 2nd though, i still think he should. its sad to watch him not play him being from the 661 and so am i. i love home town kids
Posted by: 661dodgerblue | November 06, 2008 at 06:08 PM
Mr. Met
You want the Mets to bring in Andrew Jones? The guy hit like .170 last year. I'd rather have Castillo at 2nd then Andrew Jones in the Outfield.
Posted by: metsfan99 | November 06, 2008 at 07:46 PM
Tinski, I am glad somebody notices. Yesterday, in a post linking the Mets to Dempster, Garland, Lowe, Sonnanstine, and Jackson, he chooses to focus on Ibanez and K-Rod. I feel bad for the guy.
Posted by: nrmax88 | November 06, 2008 at 08:02 PM
"Mr. Met
You want the Mets to bring in Andrew Jones? The guy hit like .170 last year. I'd rather have Castillo at 2nd then Andrew Jones in the Outfield"
That's really strange, seeing as how Andruw would be gone after one year, and we are not committed to him for longer then that, where he also still has some upside. Castillo is here for 3 years, and has no considerable upside at all.
Posted by: nrmax88 | November 06, 2008 at 08:04 PM
Hey clarknaddison, Fuentes is American and they're shopping Feliciano. Idiot.
Posted by: locofococo | November 06, 2008 at 09:29 PM
Clarknaddison, you are officially the stupidest person I've ever had the disadvantage of listening to. Just for your ignorant comments I'm going to vote for Omar Minaya for president in 4 years. It's not his fault the best players in baseball are hispanic. Get over it, stop crying. No one complains about all white teams.
Posted by: shaddix | November 06, 2008 at 10:26 PM
Back to important things, I still feel the mets would be better off trading for a closer like street or Ryan instaed of pursuing one through free agency. I like ayala to sign again and would like the mets to go after Beimel or affeldt. I think sanchez had a rough time last year because of the long lay off he had which resulted in a drop of velocity. I predict a respectable year for him in '09 if he stays healthy. Smith and Feliciano are both keepers and I would like to see more of stokes.
Posted by: shaddix | November 06, 2008 at 10:34 PM
nrmax i've been through this time and time again on this site so i'm not going to go through backing Street up again. Just do me a favor and go look up his stats and his peripherals. In fact, since people seem to like to take his bad 1st half of 08' and run with it, look up his stats for 2007 and prior. You don't put up those numbers, that consistently by being anything but good.
Posted by: jpshark | November 06, 2008 at 10:58 PM
In order to get Street I'm assuming that Murphy would have to be one of the pieces, no question.
Posted by: CitizenSnips | November 06, 2008 at 11:04 PM
"In order to get Street I'm assuming that Murphy would have to be one of the pieces, no question."
Murphy has Beane/A's written all over him. Great plate discipline, and can slot right in at 3rd if Chavez can't play 3B after his surgery, and in the 1B/OF if he can.
Probably the piece BB would go for, yes and the piece I personally, as an A's fan, would hope was coming back. In dealing with the A's, one of Murphy or Wilmer Flores are probably the ideal targets.
Posted by: melonis rex | November 06, 2008 at 11:21 PM
I would hate to see Murphy leave the Mets, but he would be the better fit for Oak. I'd rather see an Evans/Carp, Heilman and another b prospect for Street. If Murphy is included, I'd have to back down and pursue a closer through FA. Although I really like BJ Ryan.
Posted by: shaddix | November 06, 2008 at 11:27 PM
Murphy is probably the Met Im most excited to see as mets fan. Like Melonis rex said his plate discipline was incredible last year for a rookie and he handled lf pretty well for a 3b. I would love to see him take over at 1b when Delgado leaves. I just hope he can get playing time in '09. I don't know if he would be able to pull off 2b, but I guess we'll see.
Posted by: shaddix | November 06, 2008 at 11:30 PM
I have no problem trading for Ryan or Street, but I'm pretty sure Street to NY was nixed a little while ago over I forget what. If a trade for a closer can't be had, then I think the Mets need to rebuild the bullpen completely. Trading away at least 2 of the 3 Heilman, Feliciano, Schoenweiss is a must, possibly needing to package with a mid to top level prospect in order to hopefully get a solid LF in return. A core of these six would be my dreams: Brian Fuentes (LHP CL), Jeremy Affeldt (LHP RP), Joe Smith (submarine RHP RP), Chad Cordero (RHP set-up RP), Darren Oliver (LHP long RP), Luis Ayala (RHP RP). I understand this would be a considerable dent in the draft with all the Type A's and B's, however the Mets scouting and draft choices over the past few years have not been tops to say the least. I feel that the addition of these five new contracts, as Smith is still under team control, would cost around $19-$25 million per year for an effective re-vamp ($12-$14 million going to Fuentes, Cordero getting in the $2-$4 million range, with Affeldt, Ayala and Oliver getting comparitive contracts totaling $5-$7 million in summation). Fuentes I feel would command around a 4yr/$52 mil or a 3yr/$42 mil type contract. Cordero would have to settle for a set-up role, but comming off shoulder surgery I feel he would accept around a 3yr/$14 mil contract ($4.3 mil per year coming off surgery from $6.2 mil). Affeldt I see wanting a 3 year deal but I see the Mets hopefully getting him at around 2yr/$4.5 mil or at most 3yr/$6 mil. Ayala and Oliver will get comparable contracts, around 2yr/$2.75 mil. Although Tim has Omar spending around $30 million by comparing their entry salary from the 2008 season, however with the new stadium and demand for a contender, as well as recent news coming out that Omar has the greenlight to spend, I see him topping off at around a $45 million off-season. With around $23 million committed to the new bullpen, I hope we send around $16 mil a year for 3 to 4 years toward Derek Lowe, a proven realiable starter with post-season success and durability. leaving around $8 to $10 million more, they should go for a fifth rotation veteran on a short 1 or 2 year contract, Randy Wolf is a possibility but he will probably require more years on a contract as well as costing more draft picks being a Type B FA. A less costly, higher-risk option would be Odalis Perez who may settle for a 2yr/$11 mil deal. However they can also use this extra money to look to re-tool the bench.
Posted by: 86 World Series Baby | November 06, 2008 at 11:44 PM
If the Rangers have serious interest, how would a package including Heilman, Carp/Evans as an option to replace Blalock at 3rd, and a mid-level pitching prospect with considerable potential in 21 year old SP Brad Holt for LF David Murphy, a position the Mets are starving to replace but can't pursue due to more pressing issues with the bullpen. The Rangers get one year of Heilman and will be able to give him a second chance at starting, and although I can't guarantee Carp's readiness for '09, Evans has shown signs he is ready for on the job training during the '09 season in ML ready talent displayed during the '08 season. The ever pitching starved Rangers also have a solid talent in RHP SP Holt. That would be ideal for Met fans, and I have to believe it's intruiging to say the least from the Rangers' perspective.
Posted by: 86 World Series Baby | November 07, 2008 at 12:01 AM
Carp and Evans are both 1b, and Holt looks impressive as a young starter so far. I would like to see him develop in our system, and see what he can offer. Plus I don't think we need another lh hitter in the lineup, which is why I don't like Ibanez for the Mets.
Posted by: shaddix | November 07, 2008 at 12:16 AM
I understand he is another left-handed hitter, but the Mets are in need of an everyday LF, platoons rarely work over the course of a full season, and it is often difficult for players to stay healthy for a 162 game season when they are unable to get into a constant grove; i.e. Tatis at the end of the season. I understand both Carp and Evans are 1B, but both have minor (very minor) experience at the hot corner, and at such a young age they both can adapt. If not Texas' young option at first base in Chris Davis has much experience at 3B and could be moved. On the subject of Holt, he does have a high ceiling but he is very young and we do have several comparable prospects in Moviel, Antonini, Rustich, and Vinyard. Holt posted a career year in the minors this year so his worth is at a high. David Murphy I believe would be under team control through 2010 or even 2011, not sure, but he would offer the Mets security in the OF. The trade scenario also allows the Mets to keep Murphy, giving them the option to bat him against LHP and start in LF occasionally. An OF of David Murphy, Carlos Beltran, and Ryan Church is one I feel very confident in. This also frees up Heilman's spot in the 'pen, creating the need to go out and sign the relievers I mentioned above. Still I believe both Schoenweis and Feliciano both need to be moved as well, and they both have very high value as specialist type relievers.
Posted by: 86 World Series Baby | November 07, 2008 at 12:54 AM
Holt wouldn't be able to be traded for at least another 7-8 months due to league rules. On top of that I highly doubts the Mets would want to trade him considering he's one of few bright spots in a relatively bleak looking farm system.
Posted by: CitizenSnips | November 07, 2008 at 07:00 AM
Players like Holt, Kunz and Niese are more valuable to an organization because quality pitching is a lot harder to find than a corner outfielder. The Mets can pretty much go anywhere in search for an of. If any of our young pitchers were to be moved I would believe it would have to be for a quality young pitcher that would be available.(Peavy, Webb, Linececum)Not to say however that these players are available to the Mets.
Posted by: shaddix | November 07, 2008 at 07:13 AM
Good and I stress GOOD young pitching is very valuable, but guys that are likely to fail or become pedestrian major leaguers aren't all that valuable...the problem is that we can't decided which are which. THe Mets should have a handle on what the upside for a guy like Kunz or Niese is. I really don't know, if the organization thinks Niese will be a top of the rotation guy, I think they should absolutely keep him, but if their assesment is his upside is #3 starter, I say use him as a chip.
Posted by: ChicoWalker | November 07, 2008 at 09:13 AM
nrmax88
So?........... He still hit just .170 last year. Castillo could turn it around as well. He is a lifetime .300 hitter and plays a posistion where a lot less is demanded of him. If Andrew Jones was brought in here he would be expected to put up good numbers and if he doesnt thats a whole in the lineup and the fans would boo him hard.
Like I said when it comes to Andrew Jones or Luis Castillo i'll take Castillo.
Posted by: metsfan99 | November 07, 2008 at 04:52 PM
Niese, Kunz and Holt are the most valuable pitchers the mets have right now. You can't judge how well they are really going to be unless you give them a shot. They thought Kazmir was too small a pitcher to be productive over the course of a season and they traded him. We all know how that ended up.
Posted by: shaddix | November 07, 2008 at 06:23 PM