MLB Rumors - MLB Trade Rumors
Subscribe to MLB Trade Rumors using RSS
Home     Contact     About     Advertise     Archives     Widget     Fantasy      RSS Usage

« Cards Turning Page On Fuentes? | Main | A's To Talk Contract With Giambi Soon »

Furcal Signs With Dodgers

FRIDAY, 8:37pm: The Furcal deal is officialJesse Spector has quotes from the conference call.

WEDNESDAY, 9:08pm: Just to keep this baby going, we have the contract numbers from Tony Jackson.  A backloaded three years, $30MM, $3MM of which is a bonus at the end of the contract.  The 2012 option for $13MM does vest with 600 PAs in '11.

8:23pm: The deal may be done, but we still can't get the numbers nailed down. According to Tim Brown's writethru, it could be either $33MM or $30MM. Brown has "a Dodgers source" who says it's the latter "and includes a fourth-year option for $12 million, vesting with 600 plate appearances in the third year. Other incentives could bring the total worth of the deal to about $45 million." The AP report (below) that gave the $33MM figure had quoted " a person familiar with the negotiations."

7:43pm: This MLB.com report from Ken Gurnick says "it is believed the deal is pending the passing of a physical exam." That's probably about as final as we're going to get for now. It's worth noting that a little bit earlier, Tony Jackson talked to Kinzer, who said such a statement would be premature.  (The Dodgers, like most teams, don't confirm deals until after the physical.)

7:08pm: The AP says the final numbers on the contract are 3 years, $33MM:

Furcal gets $7.5 million next season, $9.5 million in 2010 and $13 million in 2011. The deal includes a $13 million team option for 2012 with a $3 million buyout.

7:02pm: This wire report from CBSSports.com has a quote from Kinzer:

"They know we didn't have a signed contract, that we didn't have even a verbal agreement. We had, 'Things look very good and Raffy's going to sleep on it,'" Kinzer said after a news conference for another client, Francisco Rodriguez.

5:53pm: Rosenthal has updated his post with a bit more info and a timeline from Wren. Around midnight on Monday, after much negotiating, Kinzer told Wren, "we're good." Tuesday morning, says Rosenthal (note the slight discrepancy from Brown's report below), Wren "got a voicemail from Kinzer" asking for the term sheet to be put together and faxed to him, which Wren did. "Shortly thereafter, Kinzer began 'backpedaling,' saying he promised the Dodgers he would talk to them." And on Tuesday, the Dodgers "suddenly" appeared willing to grant Furcal a third year -- and today, the Braves were told that Furcal would not be joining them.

5:43pm: Tim Brown reports that the Braves had sent Furcal a signed term sheet, according to "a club source." Monday night, Kinzer asked for the paperwork to be faxed to him. Braves GM Frank Wren complied Tuesday morning. Writes Brown:

No member of the Braves’ front office – not Wren, not longtime former GM John Schuerholz – could recall a time when a signed term sheet was not the equivalent of a handshake agreement, ethically – if not legally – binding.

Brown adds that the Braves believe Kinzer shopped the term sheet to the Dodgers, who had been reluctant to commit to a third year.

4:47pm: The latest from Rosenthal:

The Dodgers and Furcal were still hammering out an agreement Wednesday afternoon, sources said, but the Braves had been informed that Furcal would not accept their deal.

4:10pm: Ken Rosenthal says Furcal decided to sign with the Dodgers.

Mark Bowman's latest doesn't suggest Furcal made a decision, but he does explain why the Braves thought they had a deal.  Bowman's source believes the Dodgers offered three years plus a fourth-year player option.

11:48am: Yahoo's Tim Brown: Furcal is "nearing an agreement with the Dodgers."  Joel Sherman learned from Kinzer that the Dodgers are in the lead, having matched the Braves' three-year, $30MM (plus a fourth-year vesting option) offer.  Paul Kinzer told Sherman the idea of switching to second base for the Braves gave Furcal pause.

Kinzer told Danny Knobler there was never a verbal agreement with the Braves.  Kinzer lives in Atlanta and received 50 phone calls from fans after the story broke yesterday.

9:39am: Yesterday we watched as Rafael Furcal and his agents seemingly ignored a gentleman's agreement with the Braves to continue negotiating with the Dodgers.  Dylan Hernandez of the L.A. Times learned from Ned Colletti that the Dodgers improved their offer to Furcal (the original was two years with a vesting option).

According to Buster Olney, the Braves offered three years, $30MM with a vesting option for the fourth year.  Olney says the A's were at $38MM guaranteed over four years.

Sarah Green also contributed to this post.


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e20105368255d9970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Furcal Signs With Dodgers:

Comments

Furcal can stay with the Dodgers, and when he gets hurt again, us Braves fans will sit here a laugh.

Im sick of Furcal stories too, just sign with a club already or move on.
I think that no team will get what they paid for with him if he winds up on the DL like he did last year. As if he was the most wanted player of all time. He is not.
Just take your offer and play for a team that wants you - you still aren't worth the money youre asking for wherever you sign

Jeez, the Braves are certainly getting jerked around this offseason.

Furcal is nothing more than a luxury to the Braves, not a necessity. I was all for the Braves signing him when it was reported, but now that he apparently backed out and hasn't committed either way, I think the Braves should just keep the money and spend more on the draft or actually get what they need, a LF right-handed power bat and a good starting pitched

No one is worth that money>> The Braves need to look at character. An agreement is an agreement. Move on. I am sure when RF gets hurt he will expect his money because of the agreement.

It would be funny if both teams back out and the agent tries to use the gentlemens agreement to back his way into a contract.

I would avoid this guy and his agent. I remember a few years ago when he had seemingly signed with the Cubs, and then all of a sudden he signed with the Dodgers for more money / less years. It would seem that he had an agreement with the Cubs at that time, like he now has with the Braves...

All these bitter people because Furcal hasn't signed a contract. Just because the Braves thought Furcal had agreed to a contract DOES NOT mean he did.
I'm sure Furcal only wants to play SS, so if he can get the Dodgers to offer a 3 year contract worth the same as the Braves, he'll take it because he can be the SS and not a 2B.

And I'm sure Furcal is looking at the NL West vs. the NL East when making a decision. The Braves have to find a way to beat the Mets and Phillies. The Dodgers have a division where the D'backs, Rockies and Padres are cutting salary, and a Giants team that doesn't have much talent. Getting to the playoffs seems to be much easier with the Dodgers, with or without Manny.

The only real value Furcal brings is allowing Escobar or Johnson to be traded for a LF or SP. And that's assuming Furcal even stays healthy next year. If he doesn't, the Braves have only Omar Infante for SS. My thought is just go ahead and trade Johnson if there is a deal waiting for a LF or SP. Prado will give you mostly the same offense as Johnson and somewhat worse defense. Then use the money that would have gone to Furcal to sign the missing LF or SP, resign John Smoltz, and your offseason work is done.

People aren't bitter that Furcal didn't sign a contract. They're bitter because Raffy apparently made it clear he was ready to sign the Braves offer, his agent made him sleep on the decision, and then went out shopping that offer to the Dodgers without ever telling the Braves that they didn't actually have an agreement in place.

How many other times this offseason have you seen two sides come to an agreement in principle and then one side back out while they try and get another team to match/beat the offer they "agreed" to? I understand that there was never anything in writing that Furcal signed or anything, but its obvious that the Braves were left with the impression they had an agreement in place and Furcal actually signing and taking a physical were just formalities.

look guys, its business. this is prob what happened with the braves. we'll over you 3/30m. furcal tells him he's is very intrigued, but never says we have an aggrement. the braves thought they did. meanwhile, his agent does what anyone else SHOULD do, is take the offer from one team to the team he wants to play for and see if they match it. if they do, then he can decided on even playing field, and will probably take the dodgers because it is easier route to the playoffs and he is a ss

"look guys, its business. this is prob what happened with the braves. we'll over you 3/30m. furcal tells him he's is very intrigued, but never says we have an aggrement. the braves thought they did."

Why would the Braves think they had an agreement, unless Furcal and/or his agent had indicated that to them?

Clearly, it appears that Furcal TOLD Atlanta that he would sign at 3/30, and then his agent told him to wait and see what LA offers. If I was Atlanta, I wouldn't be too happy about it either.

If he ends up in Los Angeles now, then Furcal will likely have sullied his name in Atlanta forever.

Furcal and Peavy are both not very popular in ATL right now, but I they Atl gets mad when someone doesn't want to go there, then pretty soon, there won't be anybody going there. It seems like they are just getting led on quite a bit this offseason, and I don't like it. They need to show some authority.

If we he doesn't sign at least we still have a good hitting MI as well as ~30M to spend on LF and SP. Wouldn't be a horrid situation.

This is getting ridiculous.

If the only teams who you want to play for are the Braves and Dodgers, and they both have interest in Furcal, why are you bringing other teams into this? And, when other teams make offers, why not turn them down and make it clear that you won't sign with them (i.e. the A's after their first offer).

This is some quasi-bidding war, since Furcal won't play for the highest bidder, and simply an effort to pawn the Braves and Dodgers off against each other. It'd be hilarious if both backed out...

I really don't think the Braves should sign Furcal though. Focus on LF and SP.

Wren seems to be getting hazed by the offseason players this year. Towers jerked him around, Furcal's agents are jerking him around... I think they're trying to get a feel for what kinds of crap he'll deal with and what they can get away with. Kenny Williams seems to be the only one who sat down and actually talked to him with any respect. Hopefully next year will be different.

Well I wont argue that it's an easier route to the playoffs and he knows he will get to play SS.

Still though this is the Majors Leagues and I don't believe for a minute that they just assumed or thought they had an agreement because Furcal said he was intrigued though.

I'm not trying to put Furcal down and if he goes to the Dodgers than I'm ok with that but still there's no doubt in my mind that Furcal or his agent one lead them to believe they had an agreement and I don't by the fact that the Braves would just assume it without being sure of it.

I think we shouldn't jump to conclusions yet. I am a Braves fan, but I'm not ready to dislike Peavy or Furcal.

If Furcal comes back to the Braves...it may not be the wisest thing on Wren's part, but I'm all about it because I've missed Furcal ever since he left. Wren might have misunderstood Furcal's intentions. Plus, wouldn't you rather him think about it to make sure it is what he really wants. He'll play better if he is in the best situation.

Ultimately, I think Furcal is coming back to the Brave's leadoff spot in the lineup. Right now, the important thing is to not read to much into anything until something is signed and a physical is no longer pending.

Don't blame the Braves office or Furcal. Blaim FoxSports or those that reported something as final before it ever was.

I agree with Land-Man, the Braves are getting treated really poorly this off-season...and seeing as I'm a Mets fan, :-)

Braves should look in to Dunn. He would be good for them. Besides the Braves already have a SS and KJ who is better at 2B than in LF

I hope that sorry .... does go back to the Dodgers.

Not really the best way to start off a relationship is it Fookie?

There's no way he can sign with Atlanta after all this. IF there is one lesson for Wren it is ABC "Always Be Closing"

What a debacle.

This has been a wierd offseason for us Braves fans. We are involved in alot of rumors that seem to go on forever (ie, Peavy, Burnett, Furcal, and maybe now Kawakami). The only big thing that actually happened was rumored for all of about one night and then was finalized the next day (Vazquez).

Tough times for the Braves for sure.

Furcal had better let it be known that him coming to LA is a "Manny requirement" because otherwise he may be on the outside looking into the playoffs too. Their offense was putrid without Manny and no one hit in the LCS BUT Manny.

A joke of a deal. A handshake and a man's word isn't worth much to lawyers and agents.

wow, if i were a braves fan i would be surely pissed off that Wren would allow this to happen how pathetic could you be.

Posted by: bosox87 | December 17, 2008 at 11:40 AM

How did Wren "allow this to happen". Its not like its anyones fault, but Wren didn't send his agents back to LA...

Just let him go, Wren. He isn't worth the hassle or money and you can still trade KJ for a LF or SP without Furcal since you have Prado and Infante to play 2B.

hahahah.

What a crappy offseason for Atlanta so far. They don't land Peavy or Burnett, have failed to address their outfield sitation, had Furcal back out of a deal, and gave up Tyler Flowers to land Vazquez. Sorry, Atlanta.


Before the '05 season the White Sox offered Jermaine Dye a 2 yr deal with an option for a third year. JD called Kenny Wiliams and told him he'd accept the offer. Before JD signed the contract Texas offered him a deal that would guarantee the third year. JD told Texas sorry, I already told the White Sox I accepted their offer. A class move by a class guy.

How many deals is Furcal going to walk away from? First the A's, now the Braves. The Dodgers better hurry up and sign him before he walks away from them, too.

Im not a Braves fan, I just wish he'd sign with someone already, it doesnt matter who. A player of his caliber and injury history should not take all winter to decide. First its the As, then the Braves, then Dodgers, come on already just sign with someone for an overpriced contract so that team can say later on, we spent that much on him ???
You aren't so special to not be able to decide - only 2 teams want Furcal. You're not all that Furcal. Period.

This makes me long for the days of JS when we don't hear anything until the deal is done and we had no idea is was coming. I thought that was what happened with Furcal but I guess they jumped the gun on that a bit.
At least we know that FW is trying.

"wow, if i were a braves fan i would be surely pissed off that Wren would allow this to happen how pathetic could you be."

Wren didn't allow this to happen. This was a mess to begin with.

Classless move by Furcal and his agents. No way the Braves leak the story if they aren't sure a deal is in place. Why would they want to look foolish? Then Furcal's agent takes the deal to the Dodgers, in hopes of getting them to ante up. Classless.

Man, what a horrible offseason for the Braves...

Yeah I don't really put this on Furcal as much as his agent. I think Furcal probably told the Braves that he would accept their offer, but his agent convinced him to sleep on it and then got around to trying to get the Dodgers to match the Braves offer. Once his agent started negotiating with the Dodgers and got them to up their offer, Furcal started to have 2nd thoughts. I don't like what his agent did, but there isn't anything technically wrong with it. What really bothers me is that it doesn't seem like anyone actually bothered to tell the Braves that this wasn't the sure thing that Furcal had led them to believe.

Remember guys that Furcal was out of the country when all of this happened. Clearly, he wasn't going to be signing anything until he arrived back in America. The Braves seemed to be left with the impression they had a deal in place and only had to deal with the formalities of Furcal giving his final signature on everything and taking a physical once he got back to the states. Well, I think he's finally back today, but it seems like his intentions have changed significantly...

It is interesting that Braves fan is not as "puffed up" as they once were about their offseason.

During the Peavy saga, Braves fan sure thought they were on the road to a Division championship. Now it seems that they are going to be #3 in the East again.

Re-visiting the Peavy trade may be the best thing for them, to infuse some excitement in the team. You cannot tell me that signing a 33 year-old unproven MLB pitcher would ignite this team as would signing a Cy Young winner.

This is a crazy offseason Im just wondering is FW a really bad GM or are these other GMs and agents just using a greenhorn to better their own situations? Either way this offseason has been a total disapointment so far.

nixa37,

Your 10:45 is right on.

You see lots of reports about negotiations and even agreements "in principle" (even pending a physical, which the Braves were insisting upon before inking Furcal). But I've never heard of a signing being done ... and then undone because the player's previous team intervened after the deal was announced.

I don't know how much Wren might be blamed for this meltdown, but it's certain that he's being jerked around in a very public way by agents and at least one GM.

"What a crappy offseason for Atlanta so far. They don't land Peavy or Burnett, have failed to address their outfield sitation, had Furcal back out of a deal, and gave up Tyler Flowers to land Vazquez. Sorry, Atlanta."

1. How many outfielders have been signed? One. And that was only last week.

2. Vazquez is actually pretty good, if you can get beyond the mental midget/Ozzie Guillen's doghouse mess. The Braves sold high on Flowers, especially if he ends up having to move to 1B.

3. The Braves kept Yunel Escobar. IMO, better to keep him than trade him for Peavy. They also kept Heyward, Hanson, Schafer, Freeman, Rohrborough, and Teheran.

4. On Burnett. The Braves went there with Mike Hampton. Going with a mediocre pitcher at the slot is much better than signing him just to go on the DL. Braves are not the Yankees.

I wouldn't say their offseason has been going great, but I wouldn't say its been crappy. Philadelphia probably has had a worse offseason so far.

"I don't know how much Wren might be blamed for this meltdown, but it's certain that he's being jerked around in a very public way by agents and at least one GM."

Which GM is jerking Wren around?

Yep, because the offseason is over.

This has to be the most anyone team has been jerked around this offseason. this will make the 3rd name that has been close to coming to atlanta only to not come.

Also in regards to Dunn. the braves said they dont want someone who just hits home runs they want someone who plays good DEF too.

wow, if i were a braves fan i would be surely pissed off that Wren would allow this to happen how pathetic could you be.

Posted by: bosox87 | December 17, 2008 at 11:40 AM

Stupid comment.

Until the words come out of Furcal's mouth that he signed somewhere, don't believe a low life scumbag known as Kizner.

Maybe the lesson should be: keep your mouth shut until the player has signed the contract. Then you won't think you have a deal completed when it hasn't been.

maybe it's because i toggle b/w a financial blog and this site, but many of you have no concept of how deals are struck in the real world.

this situation is not "classless." it's business.

full disclosure: i bleed dodger blue. come on fookie!

Whoever he signs for 3 yr/$30m is a fair price. As long as he stays healthy for most of his contract!

He is still one of the best SS in the game.

Just another idiot...your name fits you well. How exactly is Vazquez "unproven"?

Ha, "gentleman's-agreement"?!? With they way things have been the last few years, it's hard to believe that those have any validity left in them (which is sad and unfortunate).. Because of the '95 World Series, I would never say that I "like" the Braves (at least not in a public setting) but I certainly feel bad about how they have been jerked around this offseason... Peavy, Furcal, Burnett. That's three big ones that seemingly got away.

Also, I wouldn't call this a crappy offseason for Atlanta so far. Its been more disappointing than anything else. True they didn't land Burnett or Peavy, but that's only because they refused to try and outbid the Yanks for Burnett (probably a good idea) or cave in to the Padres asking price on Peavy (could be good or bad). So they haven't done anything good or bad on those fronts.

As for the Vazquez deal, well we sold high on a prospect in Flowers that was at the absolute peak of his value and was blocked for the foreseeable future at the position where he has real value. We managed to turn Flowers and 3 marginal prospects (Gilmore barely cracked the Braves top 25, whole Rodriguez and Lillibridge didn't even manage that) into 2 years of 200+ IP at a minimum of league average level. Unless Flowers proves his bat can play at 1B or the other prospects make significant improvement, I don't think the Braves took any sort of hit in this deal.

I can't blame any GM that has to deal with Furcal.

He did this kind of BS three years ago when the Cubs were about to sign him. He did it to the Athletics and Braves this offseason. The Dodgers may be close to signing him, but who knows. Don't believe any headlines about Furcal until a deal is signed.

Stop bashing Wren and the Braves.

I hope Furcal signs a huge contract to play SS with the Dodgers. Then I hope they trade him in June to play 2nd base for a team that goes on to finish last for the next 3 seasons.

Melonis-

I realize they have a good deal of time to make changes, and the Vazquez trade wasn't necessarily bad for Atlanta.

But in terms of their goals this offseason, it seems like their plans keep falling through. They planned on landing Peavy but couldn't work it out (not that that was a bad idea, they were giving up a lot), then planned on landing Burnett, then planned on landing Furcal.

It just seems like they keep going through options just to have things not work out.

The Braves have money so they're going to make some sort of move for a pitcher, and likely an outfielder, and there's still hope for things to work out, but as of right now it's been a pretty unsuccessful offseason for Atlanta.

Wow Mr. Pink is a big businessman !! I would love a tutorial of how "deals are struck in the real world".

Could be one of the most pompous things I have read on this site.

I can takle sollace it came from a Dodger fan.

As a Braves fan, this is very embarassing. Looks like Furcal's agents played us like a fiddle to get the Dodgers to up their offer.

Smoltz beard - The Braves interest in Kawakami (an unproven 33 year old) as another starter is what I was talking about.

Vasquez is an adequate #3, but was brutally overpaid for.

SO hence, I am not an idiot on that topic...

Just another idiot,

What Braves fans thought we were on our way to a division title? Many Braves fans were against a Peavy trade because they didn't think he'd help us compete in 2009 anyway. At best, informed fans knew that if everything went right this offseason we'd be in the discussion for the division and WC along with the Mets and Phillies.

As for the Peavy trade, even if the Braves had signed Raffy it would have been incredibly unlikely. If they don't, there is clearly no chance talks will get revived because the Braves can't move Escobar and moving Hanson or Heyward would make even less sense now that we're probably not going to be in the running for a playoff spot anyway.

If its true they had an agreement thats fucked up how Furcal did that..But I really think the Braves should be going after Dunn or Burrell now.. Preferably Dunn

The Braves still have plenty of money to spend and prospects they could trade to upgrade their major league club. It's too soon to consider this offseason a disappointment. The free agent market is still crowded with players the Braves could sign to play LF or be at the top of their rotation. If Smoltz continues to prove he is healthy and resigns with Atlanta, that alone would give them an ace better than anybody they could have realistically gotten not named Peavy.

When Burnett and Furcal are on the DL much of next year, we Braves fans won't be missing them much.

@Just another idiot

well for starters, you don't announce a deal until the ink hits the paper.

didn't mean to sound pompous. we're obviously from different worlds.

i just think idiots like you, sound like,well, just another idiot.

What if and just what if Flowers is the next Marte a top prospect that we sold high on and we end up with something out the deal...I know what your thinking the Braves are not known for getting the good end of any deal, I mean we got screwed with the all the deals like the Hudson and Renteria trades...please....let the season play out and let's see what happens with Tyler before we say we overpaid...

"Vasquez is an adequate #3, but was brutally overpaid for."

I disagree with brutally overpaid. The last three years, Vazquez has had FIPs(fielding independent pitching) of 3.86, 3.80, and 3.74, playing in the Cell, and the AL.

He was incredibly unlucky two of those last three years, which is why his ERA was much higher than his FIP mark, as he had some very high BABIPs (.321 and .328) in 2006 and 2008.

"The Braves interest in Kawakami (an unproven 33 year old) as another starter is what I was talking about."

He's a better signing at his price tag than Garland or Oliver Perez or even Randy Wolf will be at theirs. Very low risk, when looking at the overall price tag.

If Flowers ends up another Scott Thorman and we end up with 40-45 wins over the next 3 years of Vazquez, I'd say we won...

Just another idiot,

So the Braves brutally overpaid for Vazquez by giving up Flowers and 3 fringe prospects, but they wouldn't have been overpaying for Peavy if they had given up Escobar, Hernandez, and Morton in addition to Flowers (or Locke). Sorry, I don't think the upgrade from Vazquez to Peavy is worth Escobar, Hernandez, and Morton. I'm sure the fact that you're a Padres fan is affecting your opinion at all though, right?

mr. pink,

No one ever announced that the deal was done. It simply leaked from sources that the Braves and Furcal had reached an agreement in principle. Obviously, the Braves considered the signing and physical a formality to be taken care of once Furcal returned to the US today (he wasn't physically present at negotiations).

Idiot,

Touche. I saw 33 years old and checked Vazquez's age and figured you just botched it by a year.

You're really off base in your statement that we "brutally overpaid" for him, however.

@Just another idiot

well for starters, you don't announce a deal until the ink hits the paper.

didn't mean to sound pompous. we're obviously from different worlds.

i just think idiots like you, sound like,well, just another idiot.

Posted by: mr.pink | December 17, 2008 at 12:22 PM

Who announced anything??? At this point its all speculation. That's why Tim calls it MLBTRADERUMORS.com

I didn't hear anything about the Braves holding a conference call/meeting???

oh and for what its worth, no one with a SN of "Mr. Pink" should have the right to make fun of anyone else's name, just sayin.

While they may not have had a "verbal agreement," this quote from Kinzer sure makes it seem like Furcal indicated to the Braves that he wanted to come to Atlanta...

"I wanted Raffy to sleep on it so we could talk about it again today. I didn't want him to make an emotional decision, because he was so excited about coming [to Atlanta]."

He's talking about Monday night right there. Seems like Raffy had made up his mind (and this was probably known to people within the Braves organization), but his agent was able to convince him to hold off on a final decision.

Nope not in the least...I would not consider myself a Padres fan.

I think there is a huge split in the talent of Peavy vs. Vasquez. Not sure I would conside Lillibridge a "fringe prospect" as he was supposed to be Escobars replacement.

I think the trade offer for Peavy was solid, but should have included Locke or Rohrbough (may have misspelled that) and not Boyer.

But as Braves fan I am sure you are not throwing your sucker in the dirt over your total lack of off-season upgrades, right Nixa37??

Wow I never really realized how pathetic the braves fans are. First of all this kind of thing happens a lot more than you hear about. MLBTRADERUMORS.com is a recent invention that sheds light to a lot of the goings on in free agency. Im willing to go out on a limb and say its even happened elsewhere this year but the team was not dumb enough to leak it like this until they were sure it was a done deal. With the way furcal has negotiated and shown his preference for the dodgers since day one, Wren should have seen this one coming a mile away and not rushed to phone that moron ken rosenthal. Normally i reserve this kind of bashing for the mediocrity that is the AAA baseball team in San Diego...but man Wren and Towers should be fired for this offseason. What a debacle. Dodgers fans were feeling the way braves fans are right now about 24 hours ago but they didnt act like a bunch of pussies. Blame peavy for not getting the trade done???? that is hilarious. This is called non-slavery capitalism. There is a reason an agreement isnt a done deal and this didnt even qualify as an agreement. Braves deserve the bleak future they are gonna get.

phils,

I'm assuming Mr. Pink is from Reservoir Dogs, in which case it's fine with me.

Just another idiot-

1. There is a HUGE difference between Boyer (fringey mediocre lefty reliever) and Locke/Rohrborough (especially Rohrborough, who's a top prospect, but Locke's also a good prospect). Huge huge difference. And, no way should the Braves have included Escobar, Rohrborough/Locke, AND Hernandez in a Peavy deal. Good on Wren for walking away then.

2. The split between Peavy and Vazquez is not worth Yunel Escobar. I probably do overvalue Escobar a little bit, I'll be honest, as a fan of a team who hasn't had a good SS in so long, but both are pretty good pitchers. Peavy is obviously better, but at his price tag, he isn't "better" than Vazquez enough to cost Escobar + more than 1 prospect.

Yep, the Braves have a pretty bleak future MattsdodgersSD. I mean we only have the 2nd best C in the game (24 years old), one of the better young SP (22 years old), and one of the 5-10 best SS in the game (26 years old) to go along with a top 5-7 farm system. Yeah that's terrible...

As for the Dodgers being in the same position as Braves fans 24 hours ago, no you weren't, because Furcal hadn't agreed to a deal in principle with your team. I don't think there is anything wrong with him backing out of the deal, that's his right, but at some point someone should have let the Braves know that negotiations were still ongoing with the Dodgers.

Dodgers can talk crap too, but in the end, the Dodgers get the Braves WASHED-UP players. I should put every teams washed-up players.

Even though I completely hate the Phillies (and everyone else in the NL East for that matter) I completely agree with the PhilliesWSchamp dude.

A handshake is squat. It is the media's fault for incorrectly presenting information without facts. I knew something was fishy...it all happened way to fast to be true.

I bet Furcal gave the Dodgers a gentlemen's agreement that they were in the lead.

DKA wrote:

"As a Braves fan, this is very embarassing. Looks like Furcal's agents played us like a fiddle to get the Dodgers to up their offer."

Looks like that was the case. It also seems that he wasn't too keen on playing 2B.

I think at the end of the day, Furcal wanted to remain in LA and Kinzer showed Colleti the offer he had to beat and it wasn't that high so the Dodgers either matched it or upped their offer enough where Furcal would stay.

I figured the A's or Braves would have to pay premium to get Furcal out of LA but apparently neither was willing to pay enough.

what exactly does "vesting" option imply.

Just another idiot,

My mistake...I assumed you were a Padres fan because the only time I've seen you post is in threads regarding Peavy or in threads where you can bring up the failed SD-ATL deal.

Lillibridge was never going to be Escobar's replacement. The Braves have made that abundantly clear. They would have signed Renteria or Furcal, and kept Lillibridge as an insurance policy in case of injury.

You think the Braves offer for Peavy was solid, but that to get it done they should have just replaced Boyer with a borderline top 100 prospect in Rohrbough. That is a huge difference in value. Rohrbough is the Braves 2nd best SP prospect and Locke would probably finish 3rd or 4th on that list. If their initial offer was solid as you say, then adding those guys in is just ridiculous.

As for how I feel about the offseason, I'm not excited about it, but its not like things are winding down. The majority of SP and LF are still on the market, and those are really the only two positions of need for the Braves. They Braves haven't made any regrettable moves yet and they still have plenty of time to make good ones. I guess you could say I'm slightly annoyed, but largely indifferent on how things have gone thus far.

I guess you should be happy with mediocrity Melonis Rex...and to say Peavy is worth Esobar and one prospect you are nuts !

A vesting option automatically gets picked up if the player reaches some predetermined number in a specified statistical category. The 4th year on the Braves deal apparently would have vested if Furcal played at least 132 games (I think that was the number) in 2011 (3rd season of the deal).

I think I'm going back to school to become a journalist! Obviously they don't know what they're talking about half of the time because it's usually completely off base and wrong. I guess Furcal and his agent were baiting the Braves as leverage.

Melonis Rex isn't a Braves fan Idiot.

And I think his point was the DIFFERENCE between Peavy and Vazquez (when contracts are considered as well) isn't worth Escobar and another prospect, not that Peavy isn't worth Escobar and a prospect.

Also, has no one considered the possibility that Kinzer wanted the Braves to think they had Furcal locked up, so that when the info leaked to press the Braves wouldn't deny, giving Kinzer even more leverage with the Dodgers?

Think about it, if the Dodgers aren't convinced that the Braves have a 3 year 30MM offer on the table with a vesting option for a 4th year and that Furcal has essentially already accepted that offer, would they have just have called Kinzer's "bluff"? The information leak certainly helped Kinzer and Furcal far more than it helped the Braves.

lol @ braves fans melting down on here. Hilarious.

MattsdodgersSD,

You are an idiot. If you think the Braves have a bleak future you are an idiot. They have 2 of the top prospects in baseball and quite a few other players that are projected to big league regulars at least. That's not to mention Brian McCann, Jair Jurrjens, and Escobar as a foundation. You are a moron.

lol @ braves fans melting down on here. Hilarious.

Posted by: NedCollettiClueless | December 17, 2008 at 01:05 PM
-----

I kno rite?? lolololololol!


Fact is, we weren't exactly excited about Furcal; it was the fact that we believed that a deal for a pitcher would come after that involving Escobar or Johnson. Now we're still stuck in neutral.

phils,

I'm assuming Mr. Pink is from Reservoir Dogs, in which case it's fine with me.

Posted by: Smoltz's Beard | December 17, 2008 at 12:37 PM

Smoltz' Beard,

I totally forgot about that, thanks.

I hereby take back any "thoughts" I had about the poster named "Mr Pink".

LOL

Well, from the perspective of a fan, I'm overjoyed that Furcal seems to want to return to my Dodgers. He's one of my favorite players on the squad and I would have missed him.

I still remember that sweet half-swing bunt that he laid right in the gap between first and the pitcher to squeeze in that game changing run during the NLDS victory over the Cubs. Stay in LA, Raffy!

Let's play another edition of Rumors Gone Wild, starring Your Host, Mr. Tim Dierkes. I don't know what to believe any more, though it doesn't surprise me that Furcal prefers the Dodgers. The Braves already have a fine shortstop in Escobar, quit trying to convert other shortstops to play second base!

Furcal seems to be conducting himself in a very douchy manner this off-season.

Good luck to whichever team gets him. Hope you have a backup plan when he gets hurt again.

Kinzer hasn't come off well in this whole debacle. I hope this situation is resolved soon because I am bored of Furcal now. I have no problem with a player trying to get the best possible deal for himself, but he seems to have played the A's off against the Braves, and then the Braves off against the Dodgers.

I'm suprised by the Wren bashing - I think the opposite is in order. He's had 3 major deals at his fingertips in the last 6 weeks, and he didn't panic and overpay when someone else jumped in. His one deal, with the CWS, looks like a good one to me. He's done a great job so far. Let's not forget his first two moves as GM - Renteria-Jurjjens/Hernandez and Ohman/Infante-Ascanio. Those were pretty damn good. The offseason is still very, very young.

"I hope this situation is resolved soon because I am bored of Furcal now."

According to Olney, a decision should happen today.

Die-Hard Dodger Fan, I don't think the pay was the problem.

I think it was more the playing 2nd that was the problem.

I'm guessing we would have traded Escobar and Furcal would have played short, but there not going to give Escobar away so they couldn't guarentee Furcal that Escobar would be traded which means there's a chance that he would be playing 2nd.

I also wonder if this is something that his agent talked to him about. Maybe Furcal didn't want to play 2nd but was willing to sign thinking Escobar would get traded and maybe his agent said even though that's possible you still need to realize that there's a chance he doesn't get traded and than you would be playing 2nd.

Just my guess though but the Braves needed pitching and there not to interested in anyone that's left on the FA market. So that leaves trade and Escobar seems to be there best option to use in a trade but they can't do that without having someone else to play SS and IMO that would be Furcal.

Once he's off the FA market that probably takes there top trade option off the market as well.

yeah i remember when the cubs thought they had Furcal. Kind of sucks. You would be better off with Dunn in LF and leave Johnson and 2B where his bat is good enough. Dunn most likey would require less years and around the same amout of money so its worth it.

BravesRed:

I'd like to believe that I really would, but according to Kinzer at least three deadlines/decision dates have already been and gone! Lets hope fourth time is a charm.

1 2 3 4 5 Next »

Post a comment

This weblog only allows comments from registered users. To comment, please Sign In.


Top Stories



Search MLBTR

Lijit Search

MLBTR Mailing List

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


MLBTR Features



Recent Posts



Rumors By Team



Monthly Archives


Live Chats


Tuesdays at 2 p.m. CST



Site Map     Contact     About     Advertise     Privacy Policy     Widget     Fantasy     Rss Feed


MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com.