![]() |
|
|
| |
« Cards Turning Page On Fuentes? | Main | A's To Talk Contract With Giambi Soon »
FRIDAY, 8:37pm: The Furcal deal is official. Jesse Spector has quotes from the conference call.
WEDNESDAY, 9:08pm: Just to keep this baby going, we have the contract numbers from Tony Jackson. A backloaded three years, $30MM, $3MM of which is a bonus at the end of the contract. The 2012 option for $13MM does vest with 600 PAs in '11.
8:23pm: The deal may be done, but we still can't get the numbers nailed down. According to Tim Brown's writethru, it could be either $33MM or $30MM. Brown has "a Dodgers source" who says it's the latter "and includes a fourth-year option for $12 million, vesting with 600 plate appearances in the third year. Other incentives could bring the total worth of the deal to about $45 million." The AP report (below) that gave the $33MM figure had quoted " a person familiar with the negotiations."
7:43pm: This MLB.com report from Ken Gurnick says "it is believed the deal is pending the passing of a physical exam." That's probably about as final as we're going to get for now. It's worth noting that a little bit earlier, Tony Jackson talked to Kinzer, who said such a statement would be premature. (The Dodgers, like most teams, don't confirm deals until after the physical.)
7:08pm: The AP says the final numbers on the contract are 3 years, $33MM:
Furcal gets $7.5 million next season, $9.5 million in 2010 and $13 million in 2011. The deal includes a $13 million team option for 2012 with a $3 million buyout.
7:02pm: This wire report from CBSSports.com has a quote from Kinzer:
"They know we didn't have a signed contract, that we didn't have even a verbal agreement. We had, 'Things look very good and Raffy's going to sleep on it,'" Kinzer said after a news conference for another client, Francisco Rodriguez.
5:53pm: Rosenthal has updated his post with a bit more info and a timeline from Wren. Around midnight on Monday, after much negotiating, Kinzer told Wren, "we're good." Tuesday morning, says Rosenthal (note the slight discrepancy from Brown's report below), Wren "got a voicemail from Kinzer" asking for the term sheet to be put together and faxed to him, which Wren did. "Shortly thereafter, Kinzer began 'backpedaling,' saying he promised the Dodgers he would talk to them." And on Tuesday, the Dodgers "suddenly" appeared willing to grant Furcal a third year -- and today, the Braves were told that Furcal would not be joining them.
5:43pm: Tim Brown reports that the Braves had sent Furcal a signed term sheet, according to "a club source." Monday night, Kinzer asked for the paperwork to be faxed to him. Braves GM Frank Wren complied Tuesday morning. Writes Brown:
No member of the Braves’ front office – not Wren, not longtime former GM John Schuerholz – could recall a time when a signed term sheet was not the equivalent of a handshake agreement, ethically – if not legally – binding.
Brown adds that the Braves believe Kinzer shopped the term sheet to the Dodgers, who had been reluctant to commit to a third year.
4:47pm: The latest from Rosenthal:
The Dodgers and Furcal were still hammering out an agreement Wednesday afternoon, sources said, but the Braves had been informed that Furcal would not accept their deal.
4:10pm: Ken Rosenthal says Furcal decided to sign with the Dodgers.
Mark Bowman's latest doesn't suggest Furcal made a decision, but he does explain why the Braves thought they had a deal. Bowman's source believes the Dodgers offered three years plus a fourth-year player option.
11:48am: Yahoo's Tim Brown: Furcal is "nearing an agreement with the Dodgers." Joel Sherman learned from Kinzer that the Dodgers are in the lead, having matched the Braves' three-year, $30MM (plus a fourth-year vesting option) offer. Paul Kinzer told Sherman the idea of switching to second base for the Braves gave Furcal pause.
Kinzer told Danny Knobler there was never a verbal agreement with the Braves. Kinzer lives in Atlanta and received 50 phone calls from fans after the story broke yesterday.
9:39am: Yesterday we watched as Rafael Furcal and his agents seemingly ignored a gentleman's agreement with the Braves to continue negotiating with the Dodgers. Dylan Hernandez of the L.A. Times learned from Ned Colletti that the Dodgers improved their offer to Furcal (the original was two years with a vesting option).
According to Buster Olney, the Braves offered three years, $30MM with a vesting option for the fourth year. Olney says the A's were at $38MM guaranteed over four years.
Sarah Green also contributed to this post.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e20105368255d9970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Furcal Signs With Dodgers:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
wow i didnt realize that good old Frenchy is better than either and kemp. Can I see some numbers to support that claim? BTW chipperstown there sure are alot of ifs in that comment (coulda shoulda woulda)
Posted by: cutmeibleedblue | December 17, 2008 at 07:12 PM
That notion makes me LOL all over.
Posted by: Ivdown | December 17, 2008 at 07:19 PM
chipperstown,
Just because some shmoe posts that on his personal blog does not make that true. If you believe everything that is posted on a personal blog I'm gunna put one up right now that has some wonderful property in alaska, you interested? The rumor surfaced when, for some reason, some other bloggers and reporters posted that martin may be traded. I am a faithful reader of MLBTR and that is the only time I ever saw anything like that. I read an interview with torre recently in which he compares martin to jeter and calls him the leader of the team. I'll be posting that link soon, in case you're interested chipperstown :)
Posted by: cutmeibleedblue | December 17, 2008 at 07:21 PM
I look forward to McCann's power developing then.
Posted by: NickC | December 17, 2008 at 07:21 PM
NickC...haha, your comment is priceless.
Posted by: Smoltz's Beard | December 17, 2008 at 07:22 PM
Don't worry Braves fans, when the former Braves has beens are making almost $30 million this season sitting on the DL, we'll get the last laugh.
Posted by: BravesRed | December 17, 2008 at 07:24 PM
Braves fans need to get the sand out of their vaginas. Don't have your little hissy fits on here because you have a jackass for a GM.
Posted by: Peavo | December 17, 2008 at 07:26 PM
"I look forward to McCann's power developing then."
You might want to hope he doesn't have yet another off year. His two good years have each been precluded by an average year.
Posted by: DodgersBruin | December 17, 2008 at 07:26 PM
Don't worry Braves fans, when the former Braves has beens are making almost $30 million this season sitting on the DL, we'll get the last laugh.
Posted by: BravesRed | December 17, 2008 at 07:24 PM
We had about 46 million worth of former braves (schimdt, Furcal, Jones) on the dl last year for at least 2 months each.
Posted by: Ivdown | December 17, 2008 at 07:27 PM
Is it well established for their power to spike that tremendously? I think not.
Exactly, NickC...in that case we can look forward to McCann gaining better plate discipline and power over the years.
(my original remark about your priceless post was about your OPS+ one...just so you're not confused.)
Posted by: Smoltz's Beard | December 17, 2008 at 07:27 PM
Atl braves : 270 ba, 345 obp, 408 slg, 753 ops,
La Dodgers 264 ba, 333 obp, 399 slg, 732 ops,
The braves are ahead in every single category there and they traded away one of their best players while la got by far thier best player late in the saeson with a full season of tex we would have dismantalled u guys offensivley, not that we werent already better offensivley.
And beast of the east its already a rivalry to me consedering i live in so cal and go to every braves game in la and have to deal with the ignorant dodger fans at dodger stadium. Im not calling all dodger fans ignorant but the majority of the fans that pack dodger stadium have no clue what thier talking about and only go to drink beer and talk shiitt, dodger fans u know dodger stadium is a horrible place to watch a ball game especially for fans of the opposing team. it is embarressing that they are my home team and i am categorized with thier ignorant fans. Again not saying all dodger fans are but the majority at dodger stadium.
Posted by: chipperowns10 | December 17, 2008 at 07:29 PM
DodgersBruin,
Martin has had one above average year sandwiched in between two completely mediocre years.
2006: 101 OPS+
2007: 113 OPS+
2008: 106 OPS+
You don't have to defend this to the death. McCann's just better, deal with it.
Posted by: Smoltz's Beard | December 17, 2008 at 07:31 PM
IVDOWN...You cant take the truth? STFU? See I can agree SD had a bad season although a few decent ones before. SD isnt looking good for next year either. Agreed...so what? I can face the facts, can you guys? Keep it real...And PS, Moores is selling the team and that is the BEST news I've heard in years. Just think what SD can do with an ATL payroll.
Posted by: padrefuture | December 17, 2008 at 07:31 PM
"I look forward to McCann's power developing then."
You might want to hope he doesn't have yet another off year. His two good years have each been precluded by an average year.
hahahahaha thats all i have to say about that...
Posted by: chipperowns10 | December 17, 2008 at 07:31 PM
Yeah, dodgersbruin.
McCann was really bummed to have a league average season as a 21 year old.
Stop now, for your own sake.
Posted by: NickC | December 17, 2008 at 07:33 PM
Braves still suck.
Dodgers got Furcal!
Braves can bite the big one!
Posted by: dusto | December 17, 2008 at 07:33 PM
"Martin has had one above average year sandwiched in between two completely mediocre years."
I didn't know that above league average was "completely mediocre". McCann's two bad years were both lower than Martin's worst season. 95 and 10O OPS+'s. So if Martin was "completely mediocre", what did that make McCann those two years?
Posted by: DodgersBruin | December 17, 2008 at 07:34 PM
hey chipperstown, like we all made blatantly obvious, the dodgers were plagued by injuries (even moreso than the braves) all year long, and we still made it to the playoffs and had terrific pitching numbers. The dodgers have never been known as an offensive team, you should know that as a LA native. Also, you sure seem to want to make this personal with all these claims that some, but not all, dodger fans are ignorant, hey pal learn a new word. As everyone here knows, its not hitting that wins titles, its pitching. With that in mind, it could be a long year for the braves (they don't even have tex now so we'll see what kind of offensive numbers you put up in 09).
Posted by: cutmeibleedblue | December 17, 2008 at 07:35 PM
Okay first off DodgersBruin, i read you making a comment about us only winning one title in our 14 year run. well quick question, how many did ur beloved dodgers win in that same time frame? Thats what I thought. And for all the people dissing the Braves outfield in favor of the Dodgers, yeah right now it is better but Kemp right now is more potential than production and Im not sure how good Ethier is, wanna give me some stats? Then Jones/Pierre is garbage. If we're doing this based on potential which you all seem to be doing with your projection of Kemp as a star because he clearly hasn't been so far then how about Heyward, Schafer, and Francoeur. Heck we also have Gorkys if schafer or frenchy falter
Posted by: bravesfan22193 | December 17, 2008 at 07:36 PM
Chipperowns10
There are many stupid Dodger fan, but even as you say not all dodger fans are like that, it still doesnt mean anything to a fan like me who goes to watch my team play and i just cheer them on, and not play with beach balls and yell at opposing fans.
Usually 2nd and 1st level fans are better because they are more expensive seats.
Posted by: Ivdown | December 17, 2008 at 07:36 PM
"McCann was really bummed to have a league average season as a 21 year old."
He had that same league average season 2 years later.
Posted by: DodgersBruin | December 17, 2008 at 07:36 PM
since when did mac have two bad years??
Posted by: chipperowns10 | December 17, 2008 at 07:36 PM
ivdown i know, im saying its a rivalary to me because of how much i cant stand dodger fans, and i figured the good seets would be better too but i had field level tix every braves games this past year and it was almost jus as bad. Dont get me wrong its fun for a while but the drunken idiots eventually get annoying.
But im off to owrk good luck trying to brain wash people into think martin is btter than mac dodgerbruin..
Posted by: chipperowns10 | December 17, 2008 at 07:39 PM
Smoltz's Beard...what has Wren done that was so special this off season? Vasquez? LOL
Posted by: padrefuture | December 17, 2008 at 07:39 PM
Instead of arguing about whos better betwenn mac and martin lets argue about whats better sex or a bj? guess what they are both freaking awesome! so new subject PLEASE!!!!!
Posted by: JR24 | December 17, 2008 at 07:40 PM
"He had that same league average season 2 years later."
Actually, I think McCann was about 1 WAR above average in 2007, once you adjust for position.
Posted by: iamnobody | December 17, 2008 at 07:41 PM
wow padrefuture, what has kevin towers done? reveal to you that your ace wants to get out of SD and desperately wants to play for the cubs and also kicked out pads legend trevor hoffman. sound about right?
Posted by: bravesfan22193 | December 17, 2008 at 07:42 PM
bravesfan,
Kemp has scouting reports calling him a 30-30 MVP candidate every year. At 23, his 5th year playing organized baseball, he was above league average. He stole 35 bases last year. He's not "all potential". As for Ethier, he had a .375 OBP last year, 130 OPS+. Jones/Pierre isn't part of the Dodgers outfield. It'll still probably be Manny. Those three are better than your team has in your system.
As for world series titles, extend your time line 2 years and it's 1 to 1. Maybe I'll just make my time line run from the day the Dodgers moved to LA. They have 5 titles in that time. The Braves still only have 1. My point is: division titles are worthless if you don't win the World Series. So stop talking about those 14 division titles. They're meaningless.
Posted by: DodgersBruin | December 17, 2008 at 07:43 PM
While furcal danced a thin line I think it is pretty clear he took the best offer not to mention he will be on a team more likely to contend and get to play his prefered position. He would have had to get his deal to vest to get 40 mil from the braves while he got 33 from the dodgers. Unless he is absolutely terrible he will def top 40 mil over the next four years. If he has been terrible in atlanta he would have been lucky to get to 38.
Posted by: walkoffblast | December 17, 2008 at 07:43 PM
DodgersBruin,
That's totally awesome and all, but McCann has a career 122 OPS+ versus Martin's career 108 OPS+. McCann's also two year younger.
Posted by: Smoltz's Beard | December 17, 2008 at 07:43 PM
IVDOWN...You cant take the truth? STFU? See I can agree SD had a bad season although a few decent ones before. SD isnt looking good for next year either. Agreed...so what? I can face the facts, can you guys? Keep it real...And PS, Moores is selling the team and that is the BEST news I've heard in years. Just think what SD can do with an ATL payroll.
Posted by: padrefuture | December 17, 2008 at 07:31 PM
Ive seen like 5 of your posts just skimming through it this, and all of them are just shi* talking.
What facts do i need to face? That my team was just in the NLCS? They have lost key players, but signing furcal is a big step. We SHOULD be going after one of the best 4 outfielders left (manny, dunn, burrell, abreu), and then one of the good sp left (perez, rj, garland, sheets), and probly just use in house options for the 5th spot in the rotation, resign one of saito or hoffman (hopefully saito).
Sounds like a lot, but its almost a certainty we get at least one of the pitchers or one of the hitters i just mentioned, both would be nice, though.
Also, due to the West being so bad, the Dodgers will be in contention next year.
Posted by: Ivdown | December 17, 2008 at 07:44 PM
alright calm down. a 'gentelmans agreement' in a business where its not thousands, but 30million+ we are talking about, that means crap. kinzer was very smart at how he spoke regarding the sheet.
now to the players. what dodgersbruins and other fans(me included) are saying is that the young, dodger future has already been in the league for 2+ years and have been very succesful. dewitt, mcdonald, elbert, and kershaw are all entering their first full year, not up and down. so what us dodger fans are saying, is we are naming guys who helped us win last year, not guys who are a year+ away. look, both these teams are going to be good, because they have good systems.
also, if you want to talk about injurys, u have nothing to complain about. we lost laroche, nomar, and abreu before the season. then we lost penny, jones, schmdit, young, kent, and pierre, and furcal to injury. thats 87million of our payroll. if u look on that list, thats 6 all-stars, and both our starting 3rd basemen, a utility man, a 4th outfielder, 2 opening day starters, a #2 pitcher, a #5 pitcher, our starting SS and our 2nd basemen. i think we got hit worse.
Posted by: lakersdodgersyankees4life | December 17, 2008 at 07:46 PM
Division titles are worthless? Yeah because no one wants to make the playoffs, jeez give me a break.
Posted by: bravesfan22193 | December 17, 2008 at 07:47 PM
lol, losing jones and pierre made you better.
Posted by: iamnobody | December 17, 2008 at 07:48 PM
lakersdodgers, six all stars. i see two at best.
Posted by: bravesfan22193 | December 17, 2008 at 07:48 PM
alright i'm feeling really bad for the Braves and their fans right now, is that bad???
And all this talk of "he didn't want to play 2B", i thought he wasn't in the country? wasn't available? any explanation for that??? Braves are better off without him. Go get a bat that won't fall apart or have 3 errors in one inning in an LCS, haha.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | December 17, 2008 at 07:48 PM
Padrefuture,
The Vazquez trade was actually really good. A solid starter who has averaged right around 200 IP for like 8 years in a row for nothing but prospects? But, if you think that a guy who has a 7.99 K/9, 2.39 BB/9, 3.34 K/BB, and a 3.93 FIP for his career is bad, then you've got another set of problems that I may not be able to help you with. I'll also tell you what he didn't do, though. He didn't overpay for Peavy and he didn't overpay for Burnett, and I applaud him for that.
Like you should talk about GM's anyways...
Posted by: Smoltz's Beard | December 17, 2008 at 07:49 PM
glavine, smoltz, chipper (in and out of lineup), gonzalez, moylan, soriano, hudson, kotsay, diaz, and hampton. who cares about how much the players on your DL make? its about production, the Braves lost more talent to injury
Posted by: bravesfan22193 | December 17, 2008 at 07:50 PM
bravesfan22193...whats has Towers done? Are you really asking me that? Come back to me when you learn a little more about baseball. Even Dodger fans are smart enough to know Towers has pulled off some great trades...not to mention some great bullpens out of nowhere...as well as have HALF the spending power LA or ATL has.
Posted by: padrefuture | December 17, 2008 at 07:52 PM
im saying past
penny, schmidt, furcal, kent, nomar, and jones. hell braves fans should know, they watched him grow into a good player (until last year). i wasnt saying theyd be last year, but i dont think they have that nuch veteran talent on the DL. besides, we were able to get dewitt to stay and trade laroche, the joke with potenial, really a AAAA player, for MANNY
Posted by: lakersdodgersyankees4life | December 17, 2008 at 07:53 PM
Guys Martin is much better than McCann.
First off, just compare their CERAs (Cather's ERA).
McCann has a CERA of 4.26 and Martin of 3.65.
Then look at their caught stealing %'s. Martin's is 24.7% to McCann's 22.5%.
Hitting wise, McCann has more power but Martin has a higher OBP and more speed.
McCann's advantages:
-Better hitter for avg
-Better hitter for power
Martin's advantages:
-Better on-base skills
-Faster (more steals)
-Better handling pitchers
-Better defensively
All in all, you would have to say Martin is better.
Posted by: Die-Hard Dodger Fan | December 17, 2008 at 07:53 PM
McCann>Martin
Posted by: philsWSchamps | December 17, 2008 at 07:54 PM
IVDOWN...without MANNY LA was/is nothing. NOTHING
Posted by: padrefuture | December 17, 2008 at 07:54 PM
Vazquez: career 105 ERA+. 98 ERA+ last season.
I guess paying someone $11.5M for each of the next 2 years while giving up prospects is a good idea to some teams.
Posted by: DodgersBruin | December 17, 2008 at 07:56 PM
glavine, smoltz, chipper (in and out of lineup), gonzalez, moylan, soriano, hudson, kotsay, diaz, and hampton. who cares about how much the players on your DL make? its about production, the Braves lost more talent to injury
i see glavine, smoltz, chipper, hudson, and diaz who were big injuries. we3 had the same #, 10, off the top of our heads on the dl, bout only half were going to help. at least 7 were going to help at the start of last yr
Posted by: lakersdodgersyankees4life | December 17, 2008 at 07:56 PM
lolol
Posted by: iamnobody | December 17, 2008 at 07:57 PM
dodgersbruin you mention all the nice stats. 35 steals, caught 11 times. 153 strikeouts as well and not many walks. trust me besides the steals this sounds way too familiar to braves fans. francoeur. Just saying, let's see some consistency before we rush to grade him. only one season in the majors with 300+ at bats so let's see what unfolds this year. I do think he'll be great but thats projecting. And why are you so sure Manny will be back?
If Manny is not back then 2010 or 2011 the Braves outfield will pass the Dodgers if all the players meet their projections. Francoeur is only one year removed from being considered one of the game's best young stars, Heyward is a top 5 prospect in all of baseball, and Schafer and Gorkys have higher upside than Ethier. Right now the edge is to the Dodgers because Ethier and Kemp have faced MLB competition and Gorkys, Schafer, and Heyward have not but this could change very soon
Posted by: bravesfan22193 | December 17, 2008 at 07:58 PM
If Braves fans still need a leadoff hitter, Juan Pierre is available!
Posted by: eric23 | December 17, 2008 at 07:58 PM
Die-Hard Dodger Fan...is that career CERA? Martin is catching his pitchers against arguably the worst division in the majors. Do you know how many times the Braves have to go through the lineups of the Philles and Mets?
Also, saying that he has more steals is pointless because he also has more caught stealings. McCann has a higher career OPS+ at a younger age...the question about who is better offensively isn't a question at all.
BP ranked McCann at #11 and Martin at #27 for players too build your team around...I'll believe BP's opinion over yours, chief.
Posted by: Smoltz's Beard | December 17, 2008 at 07:59 PM
padrefuture,
exactly. In the NLCS the other big 4 in the Dodgers lineup (Kemp, Ethier, Loney and Martin) were 0HR's and 3RBI's in the 5 game series.
This signing means nothing if they don't get Manny and even if they do they need to rebuild their pitching staff and pray that Kershaw is ready.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | December 17, 2008 at 08:00 PM
"Francoeur is only one year removed from being considered one of the game's best young stars"
Francoeur sucks, any way you want to slice it. I'm praying Wren finds a way to replace him before next season starts.
Posted by: iamnobody | December 17, 2008 at 08:00 PM
IVDOWN...without MANNY LA was/is nothing. NOTHING
Posted by: padrefuture | December 17, 2008 at 07:54 PM
Without Manny the Dodgers were all of like 4-6 games out of contention...BIG deal. And saying the only reason the Dodgers won anything is because of Manny is laughable. Without Gonzo your team would have been contending for 110 losses. Without Ryan Howard the Phillies wouldnt have made the playoffs. Without CC sabathia or Ryan Braun the Brewers would have missed the playoffs.
Posted by: Ivdown | December 17, 2008 at 08:01 PM
Giving up some GOOD prospects for Vasquez was a decent trade I agree. But he isnt a #1 you need...in fact, I believe ATL is still trying to get that #1. But to say that Wren is a great GM cause that move when he choked on Furcal and Burnett...and lost out on Peavy.
Posted by: padrefuture | December 17, 2008 at 08:01 PM
If Braves fans still need a leadoff hitter, Juan Pierre is available!
lol, sarcasm at its finest.
the reason everyone feels mannys back is because no one has made it public he is the most important, only dodgers
Posted by: lakersdodgersyankees4life | December 17, 2008 at 08:01 PM
padrefuture, we aren't talking about the past here. Im talking about what has he done lately and its not too pretty. If we're going to include career trades then let's look at Jurrjens and Gorkys for Renteria. Or the Ohman and Infante trade. While he hasn't succeeded this off season neither has Towers
Posted by: bravesfan22193 | December 17, 2008 at 08:01 PM
What is your basis for saying Francoeur sucks? Last season? Because i could just as easily point to every season he's played before last and say he's going to turn out to be one heck of a player. the truth is nobody knows at this point and this upcoming season should answer the question
Posted by: bravesfan22193 | December 17, 2008 at 08:03 PM
If Manny is not back then 2010 or 2011 the Braves outfield will pass the Dodgers if all the players meet their projections. Francoeur is only one year removed from being considered one of the game's best young stars, Heyward is a top 5 prospect in all of baseball, and Schafer and Gorkys have higher upside than Ethier. Right now the edge is to the Dodgers because Ethier and Kemp have faced MLB competition and Gorkys, Schafer, and Heyward have not but this could change very soon
Posted by: bravesfan22193 | December 17, 2008 at 07:58 PM
Andrew Lambo will be in the majors in 2 or 3 years, and he is one of the Dodgers best prospects right now. We SHOULD still have Kemp, it would be nice to still have Ethier, so it could be Lambo in left, Kemp in center, Ethier in right.
You shouldnt count your chickens, man.
Posted by: Ivdown | December 17, 2008 at 08:04 PM
smoltz's beard,
plus McCann and the NL east has to deal with the likes of speed demons like Reyes, Rollins, Victorino, Hanley Ramirez, and solid baserunners like Werth, Beltran, Milledge.
Other than Taveras who does Martin have to worry about throwing out??
Posted by: philsWSchamps | December 17, 2008 at 08:04 PM
"Without Manny the Dodgers were all of like 4-6 games out of contention...BIG deal. And saying the only reason the Dodgers won anything is because of Manny is laughable. Without Gonzo your team would have been contending for 110 losses. Without Ryan Howard the Phillies wouldnt have made the playoffs. Without CC sabathia or Ryan Braun the Brewers would have missed the playoffs.
Posted by: Ivdown | December 17, 2008 at 08:01 PM "
IVDOWN...thanks for showing everyone why Dodgers fans make me laugh so often. LOL Manny was the ONLY reason LA made the playoffs. How do you not see this? How? Take the blue out your eyes and wake up! Go look up his stats while with LA, go look at the other players stats since Manny. Go look up stats from the playoffs. Come on...be serious now.
Posted by: padrefuture | December 17, 2008 at 08:08 PM
"What is your basis for saying Francoeur sucks?"
In 2006, he sucked, in 2007, he was below average for a RF, and in 2008, he was horrible.
Posted by: iamnobody | December 17, 2008 at 08:09 PM
Why do I think Manny will be back? Well, first off, who else has shown real interest in him? Second off, much like the Furcal situation, I see Colletti laying low until another team gets close to a deal, then the Dodgers finally coming in and finishing the deal. They did it with Casey Blake (not that I think it's a good signing). They did it with Furcal (perfect signing in terms of talent, plus keeping O. Cabrera off the team). They'll probably do it with Manny.
I don't see Francoeur with Kemp. I don't have a problem with Ks. His OBP was .340. Not bad for only playing baseball for 5 years in his life. He's MUCH better than Francoeur.
Posted by: DodgersBruin | December 17, 2008 at 08:10 PM
bravesfan22193....now think hard here, do you really think whats happened this offseason is really Towers fault? Do you know what Towers payroll was and what he has been told to do with it?
Posted by: padrefuture | December 17, 2008 at 08:10 PM
I can't believe I just read a comment that compared catcher's era of two catcher's on different teams with different pitching staffs in different divisions. Are you kidding me? The only thing that could have made that better is if you had used Varitek and Martin. Then you could add in a whole different league as well as a DH in the lineup.
Posted by: Grizzlyfox | December 17, 2008 at 08:11 PM
Ivdown, Heyward is a top prospect in ALL of baseball not just in the braves organization. I looked up Lambo and from the stats he doesn't come very close to Heyward. has an edge in power but heyward is a year younger so he should catch up. clear advantage in every other hitting category and speed. Don't know about Lambo's D but Heyward is 5 tool player so that means good D as well. Kemp is good and will be better than what the Braves put in center. The real question is right field but the braves have an insurance policy in case francoeur doesnt turn it around, and thats Gorkys Hernandez. Ethier is probably very close to his ceiling right now, Frenchy's potential is much higher but we'll see if he puts it to use. All in all the outfields are very close or will be in 1-2 years.
Posted by: bravesfan22193 | December 17, 2008 at 08:14 PM
IVDOWN...thanks for showing everyone why Dodgers fans make me laugh so often. LOL Manny was the ONLY reason LA made the playoffs. How do you not see this? How? Take the blue out your eyes and wake up! Go look up his stats while with LA, go look at the other players stats since Manny. Go look up stats from the playoffs. Come on...be serious now.
Posted by: padrefuture | December 17, 2008 at 08:08 PM
Ok man, completely disreguard my entire statement.
We wouldnt have made the playoffs without Manny, but the same can be said for half the teams that made the freakin playoffs. Lets see how the Whitesox do without Quentin, how the almost playoff twins would have done without Mauer or Morneau, how the almost playoff Mets would have done without Wright, Reyes, or Beltran.
Manny is one of the MANY examples of one player making a huge difference.
Posted by: Ivdown | December 17, 2008 at 08:15 PM
"Kemp is good and will be better than what the Braves put in center."
If by "good" you mean "perennial All-Star who should be a 30-30 player who competes for the MVP every year" then yes, that's pretty good. According to what the scouts say about Kemp, I'd say, think Grady Sizemore.
Posted by: DodgersBruin | December 17, 2008 at 08:17 PM
iamnobody, frenchy hit 29 homers in 2006 at the age of 22. with a not completely pathetic average of .260. so he showed power that year, and the next year he showed he could be a more complete hitter. .293 average, 19 homers, and 40 doubles. Yeah the K to BB ratio is bad but if he returns to those numbers I will not be disappointed.
Posted by: bravesfan22193 | December 17, 2008 at 08:18 PM
phils,
Good point. I hate your team, but your comments are valid!
Posted by: Smoltz's Beard | December 17, 2008 at 08:18 PM
DodgersBruin, if we're going by what the scouts say then why don't we just put Heyward in the Hall of Fame right now?
Posted by: bravesfan22193 | December 17, 2008 at 08:19 PM
"Manny was the ONLY reason LA made the playoffs."
So the Dodgers having the BEST pitching staff in the NL had NOTHING to do with the Dodgers making the playoffs? Let's say the Dodgers didn't trade for Manny. Had Penny been healthy I'm sure the Dodgers make it. Had the Dodgers traded for a different OF, maybe they make it. Point being, it wasn't JUST Manny. That pitching staff had a lot to do with the Dodgers making the playoffs.
Posted by: DodgersBruin | December 17, 2008 at 08:19 PM
Don't know why TypePad is being such a jerk. Won't post my comment.
The point I was trying to make to Padrefuture was that I'm glad that Wren didn't try to outbid the Yankees for Burnett, and I'm glad that he didn't just keep throwing prospects at Towers for Peavy.
Did you not see the deals he made last year for Jurrjens/Gorkys and Infante/Ohman?
Posted by: Smoltz's Beard | December 17, 2008 at 08:21 PM
"DodgersBruin, if we're going by what the scouts say then why don't we just put Heyward in the Hall of Fame right now?"
Because Heyward has never hit above A ball. Kemp is in the big leagues. We're combining scouting reports with actual on field performance.
You're talking about the 2010 OF, not the 2008 or 2009 OF. So you have to combine what Kemp has done on the field (above league average) with the projections of what he'll be when he's a finished product (30-30 hitter).
Posted by: DodgersBruin | December 17, 2008 at 08:21 PM
"iamnobody, frenchy hit 29 homers in 2006 at the age of 22. with a not completely pathetic average of .260. so he showed power that year, and the next year he showed he could be a more complete hitter. .293 average, 19 homers, and 40 doubles. Yeah the K to BB ratio is bad but if he returns to those numbers I will not be disappointed."
His wOBA in 2006 was .308, and his defense was a notch above average...which puts him right at replacement level. In 2007 his wOBA was .337, and his defense was, again, a notch above average...which made him a pretty average RF. In 2008, his wOBA was .286, which is just gross, and his defense was bad as well, putting him a couple of WAR below replacement level. He is not someone we want in our starting lineup.
Posted by: iamnobody | December 17, 2008 at 08:22 PM
It wasn't just Manny. But he basically single-handedly carried that offense to the playoffs just like CC carried the Brewers pitching staff to the playoffs. Yeah you all had excellent pitching but the offense minus Manny is not very good
Posted by: bravesfan22193 | December 17, 2008 at 08:22 PM
DodgersBruin im not disputing that kemp has produced, im just saying if we're going to look at Kemp's projection based on scout's opinion. then you should also look at the braves outfielders.
Posted by: bravesfan22193 | December 17, 2008 at 08:24 PM
Ivdown, Heyward is a top prospect in ALL of baseball not just in the braves organization. I looked up Lambo and from the stats he doesn't come very close to Heyward. has an edge in power but heyward is a year younger so he should catch up. clear advantage in every other hitting category and speed. Don't know about Lambo's D but Heyward is 5 tool player so that means good D as well. Kemp is good and will be better than what the Braves put in center. The real question is right field but the braves have an insurance policy in case francoeur doesnt turn it around, and thats Gorkys Hernandez. Ethier is probably very close to his ceiling right now, Frenchy's potential is much higher but we'll see if he puts it to use. All in all the outfields are very close or will be in 1-2 years.
Posted by: bravesfan22193 | December 17, 2008 at 08:14 PM
Yeah, i know Lambo isnt at Heywards status, im just saying we do have another good outfield prospect a couple years off. Plus the fact that Kemp isnt a free agent for 4 more years, Ethier for 3 more years, so its likely both will still be Dodgers by 10 or 11. Kemp is the one on the Dodgers with the extremely high ceiling, and Ethier is the pure hitter who will hit for average and get on base with a little bit of power, but probly wont be much better than he was this year, but I dont ask him to.
Though the Braves have a bunch of good top prospect outfielders (i think they actually have like 3 4 star outfield prospects and then Heyward at 5), the Dodgers have the MLB ready ones that are coming off of good seasons and showing good promise (more in the case of Kemp than Ethier, cause Ethier seems to be close to his ceiling like you said, though its a nice ceiling).
Oh, and about Frenchy...sorry, but he has something like a career .325 opb and has dropped off the fact of the earth (maybe following his buddy Andruw), and I dont know if you would be able to compare him to Kemp or Ethier.
Posted by: Ivdown | December 17, 2008 at 08:24 PM
DodgersBruin im not disputing that kemp has produced, im just saying if we're going to look at Kemp's projection based on scout's opinion. then you should also look at the braves outfielders.
Posted by: bravesfan22193 | December 17, 2008 at 08:24 PM
Kemp has about 2 seasons worth of Major League experience, with good results, while the outfielders you are talking about are coming off really bad years (frenchy) and all in the minors.
Posted by: Ivdown | December 17, 2008 at 08:27 PM
Even looking at the Braves OFs I don't see in 2010 or 2011 an OF of Francoeur, Heyward and Schafer being better than Kemp Ethier and Manny/Lambo. You're talking about 2 guys in their rookie/ 2nd year in your OF vs. Kemp and Ethier in their prime, having faced major league pitching for 4 years.
And I refuse to speculate on the career those guys might have until they make the show. Like you said, Francoeur was a top prospect. He hasn't been anything but league average at best. And MANY prospects never pan out. Injury, drugs, lack of talent. Get to AAA ball and we'll talk.
Posted by: DodgersBruin | December 17, 2008 at 08:29 PM
So the Dodgers having the BEST pitching staff in the NL had NOTHING to do with the Dodgers making the playoffs?
You're not going to admit that you get the advantage of pitching to the Padres, Giants, D'backs and Rockies?
I'd be willing to wager if you put your pitching staff in the NL East or God forbid the AL East they wouldn't look as good as you think.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | December 17, 2008 at 08:29 PM
Can we please stop arguing about Francoeur? His plate discipline is a joke and if he doesn't improve it he won't be in the majors much longer...it's that simple.
Posted by: Smoltz's Beard | December 17, 2008 at 08:30 PM
Why are there a bunch of people on here acting like kids and arguing about what players are better?
I mean this is an article about Furcal and where he might or is going to sign...etc
Makes no sense and who cares? I mean to argue about who is better between McCann and Martin this really has alot to do with the Furcal signing I assume?
Besides it's not like they both aren't very good.
Also to the guy talking about catcher ERA that is pointless with the Braves best pitchers having so many injuries.
Still I'm not going to argue about who's better because it's useless to do and when it comes down to it it's like this.
Probably atleast 90% of Dodger fans are going to say Martin and probably 90% of Braves fans are going to say McCann.
Now if this was a discussion about who my team might get than I might argue about who is better for my reason on wanting to sign one guy over another but to just argue for the point of saying a player on my team is better than the player on your team is pointless IMO.
Posted by: Cobrasnake | December 17, 2008 at 08:31 PM
"Can we please stop arguing about Francoeur?"
Why not? Just because Francoeur is better than Kemp on defense?
Posted by: BravesRed | December 17, 2008 at 08:32 PM
Hitting wise, McCann has more power but Martin has a higher OBP and more speed.
McCann's advantages:
-Better hitter for avg
-Better hitter for power
Martin's advantages:
-Better on-base skills
-Faster (more steals)
-Better handling pitchers
-Better defensively
All in all, you would have to say Martin is better.
Posted by: Die-Hard Dodger Fan | December 17, 2008 at 07:53 PM
---------------------------------------------
I guess you'd have a point if all those categories had equal value and the difference between the two in every category was equivalent. That's just not the case though.
There's no proof that Martin is better at handling pitchers and McCann has gotten his fair share of praise for his game-calling abilities. Martin is marginally better defensively and is a little better throwing out basestealers, but the difference between the two is only in the neighborhood of 2-3 runs.
I'll give you that Martin a slight advantage is OBP, but its not that big, only 15 points for their careers and 12 points last year. McCann's advantage in power is pretty massive though. His slugging percentage is 68 points higher for his career and it was 127 points higher last year.
Honestly, I don't think there's a big argument here. McCann is a year younger, more accomplished up to this point, and is coming off a stellar year while Martin is coming off a down one. Yeah Martin has a broader skill set, but it doesn't nearly make up for McCann's huge advantage with the bat.
Posted by: nixa37 | December 17, 2008 at 08:33 PM
"It wasn't just Manny. But he basically single-handedly carried that offense to the playoffs just like CC carried the Brewers pitching staff to the playoffs. Yeah you all had excellent pitching but the offense minus Manny is not very good"
Here are Andre Ethier's September numbers: .462/ .557/ .692.
It wasn't JUST Manny. Does Ethier put those numbers up without Manny? Who knows. If you believe in "batter protection" then probably not. If you don't, then possibly. And just to compare, Loney had a similar September the year before without Manny, so maybe it was just Ethier's month and Manny had nothing to do with it.
Posted by: DodgersBruin | December 17, 2008 at 08:33 PM
You guys want to know what the sad part about this whole situation is? Furcal should be praised for not being a money hungry traitor like 99 percent of baseball and believing in loyalty. I feel that in his heart he believes that he didn't get the job done in LA and owes them this contract. When I heard he was leaving, I was not just angry but genuinely crushed. Hearing that he is coming back should be a breath of fresh air to a world that cares about nothing but money. Thank you Raffy for reminding us what a real baseball player is supposed to be. Welcome back to Hollywood!
Posted by: HollywoodHitmen | December 17, 2008 at 08:34 PM
BravesRed,
What is that even supposed to mean?
Posted by: Smoltz's Beard | December 17, 2008 at 08:35 PM
I hope Furcal fails his physical and comes crawling back to the Braves. Then FW will fax over a term sheet to Kinzer's office with F-You written on it.
Posted by: Thundersticks | December 17, 2008 at 08:36 PM
"You guys want to know what the sad part about this whole situation is? Furcal should be praised for not being a money hungry traitor like 99 percent of baseball and believing in loyalty."
Umm, Furcal is getting more money with the Dodgers than he was with the Braves. And he's almost guaranteed to get more money that with the A's unless he really takes a crap, has his option declined and can't get a 1 year deal for $7M.
I love the signing and have been hoping it would happen all off season. But it wasn't loyalty until the Dodgers offered a 3 year deal for equal cash to other teams.
Posted by: DodgersBruin | December 17, 2008 at 08:38 PM
HollywoodHitmen,
You do realize the Dodgers offer is worth more guaranteed over the first 3 years of the deal than either the Braves or A's offers, with the potential to be worth significantly more if the option is picked up in the 4th year. Its not a lesser offer as much as an offer with different risks and rewards.
Posted by: nixa37 | December 17, 2008 at 08:39 PM
Oh yeah and by the way Braves fans, everyone in baseball definitely agrees with you that McCann is better which is why this year in the All-Star game Hurdle put in Martin for nine innings duing the most important part of the game and then when he got tired, McCann got one. Also, I heard McCann can play a mean third base. Oh, sorry, that's Russ again.
Posted by: HollywoodHitmen | December 17, 2008 at 08:39 PM
Dodgersbruin, you have to be the dumbest person I've seen on here. The Dodgers have sucked for the last 20 years and now ur gonna talk smack. Really?? Your comments about having guys competing for MVP's and Cy Youngs every year is a joke right? You're losing Manny and Lowe and the only reason you have a shot is because ur in the worst division in sports. Yeah, the Braves have fallen on hard times, but they will be back. The farm is loaded with talent..they just need some time. You better get it done soon...your time is running short. Idiot.
Posted by: njbraves | December 17, 2008 at 08:43 PM
Mccann is a better hitting catcher than Martin, there is no doubt.
I like Martin's intangibles like his leadership and ability to handle the pitching staff enough to make up for the lack of offense from martin (although he still has good offense from the catcher position).
Mccann is better, for all intents and purposes, though.
Posted by: Ivdown | December 17, 2008 at 08:43 PM
Dodgersbruin, you have to be the dumbest person I've seen on here. The Dodgers have sucked for the last 20 years and now ur gonna talk smack. Really?? Your comments about having guys competing for MVP's and Cy Youngs every year is a joke right? You're losing Manny and Lowe and the only reason you have a shot is because ur in the worst division in sports. Yeah, the Braves have fallen on hard times, but they will be back. The farm is loaded with talent..they just need some time. You better get it done soon...your time is running short. Idiot.
Posted by: njbraves | December 17, 2008 at 08:43 PM
You really want to talk about people acting like idiots when you come up with this statement?
Posted by: Ivdown | December 17, 2008 at 08:44 PM
lol nj please stop making braves fans look like idiots
Posted by: iamnobody | December 17, 2008 at 08:44 PM
Playing 3B would make Martin less valuable, so I'm not sure why that would matter. As long as either can stay at C they should. I will say however that McCann's bat probably plays about as well at 1B or DH as Martin's does at 3B.
And are you really going to argue that Martin is better because Hurdle played him longer in the ASG? Why don't we just anoint Soto the best C in the game because the fans voted him the starter? Seriously though, I'm glad you brought McCann getting no playing time in the ASG because that was one of the biggest jokes of all. Best bat left on his bench and he couldn't find a single spot to use him. Good thing the ASG doesn't mean anything.
Posted by: nixa37 | December 17, 2008 at 08:47 PM
All of this bashing on Frank Wren is kinda crazy
Furcal = From various sources it has been said that there was a term agreement sent and that the agents still shopped around after that. its not FW's fault that Furcal's agents still shopped after what in baseball is considered to be the final step of an agreement.
AJ:
It was a difference of 2 million dollars (80 mil Braves, 82 mil NY) and the fact that his wife doesnt fly so he wanted a place closer to his home. Geography messed that up for us not FW.
Peavy:
This one you cant get to detailed on because nothing official has come out about the packages offered and what SD wanted its just believed to be that Towers kept altering a deal and the Braves eventually got tired of it. can you blame them? in that time period if they had known that Peavy really didnt want to come to ATL in the first place and wanted to play for the cubs im pretty sure Kelly Johnson would have been traded to the Cardinals for Ludwick at that time. Instead we missed out on that deal and possibly some others that we may never know about.
Vasquez:
Tyler Flowers was blocked by McCann at C and if he moved to 1B he is blocked by Kotchman and Freeman. therefore the only position left is DH something the Braves dont have since they are in the NL. So in that sense he was expendable. not to mention he is 22 i believe and hasnt even cracked AA yet.
Lilli:
Showed his true value at the ML level as a backup/utility guy. plus he is blocked by Escobar and we have another SS in the system.
Gilmore:
not that great
the only thing i think might bite us is the reliever we sent them.
if you look at that stuff FW has done all he could. He already stated he didnt want to sell the farm for one person when there is so much talent in it. Nor would it be wise to have gone to a rediculous price for AJ when he is so injury prone.
So honestly why all the bashing?
Posted by: drumzalicious | December 17, 2008 at 08:49 PM
"Your comments about having guys competing for MVP's and Cy Youngs every year is a joke right?"
Yeah, you're right njbraves. I'm an idiot. I'm incapable of reading scouting reports. I can't read statistics or watch a game on the field.
Scouting reports say that Kemp will be a 30-30 player and compete for MVP awards. Scouting reports say that Chad Billingsley and Clayton Kershaw will be phenomenal pitchers and compete for multiple Cy Young Awards.
Statistics show that Bills had a 135 ERA+ with 201 Ks in 201 innings last year at age 23. Kershaw had a 100 ERA+ and 100 Ks in 108 innings at age 20. Those don't look like guys who could be any good. Might as well just dump them now.
As for your farm being loaded with talent, good. Because your "farm loaded with talent" was the Dodgers 3 years ago when the 2005 AA Jacksonville Suns were the team of the year.
http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/minors/awards/team-of-the-year/2005/26689.html
I hope your prospects make it. Ours already have.
Posted by: DodgersBruin | December 17, 2008 at 08:52 PM
doesnt matter who the dodgers are not going anywhere with torre as their manager
Posted by: Johnny Cash | December 17, 2008 at 08:52 PM
it doesnt matter who the dodgers sign they are not going anywhere with joe torre as their manager
Posted by: Johnny Cash | December 17, 2008 at 08:54 PM
nixa37,
Martin is better for the reasons I posted earlier. He has better on-base skills (ie. draws walks) , has more speed (steals bases), is better defensively and handles a staff better.
If Martin were rested more last year, his slugging % would have been higher. Not saying he has as much power as McCann but saying that the differential wouldn't have been as wide.
IMO, its pretty apparent that Martin is the better all around catcher.
Posted by: Die-Hard Dodger Fan | December 17, 2008 at 08:55 PM
All of this bashing on Frank Wren is kinda crazy
Furcal = From various sources it has been said that there was a term agreement sent and that the agents still shopped around after that. its not FW's fault that Furcal's agents still shopped after what in baseball is considered to be the final step of an agreement.
AJ:
It was a difference of 2 million dollars (80 mil Braves, 82 mil NY) and the fact that his wife doesnt fly so he wanted a place closer to his home. Geography messed that up for us not FW.
Peavy:
This one you cant get to detailed on because nothing official has come out about the packages offered and what SD wanted its just believed to be that Towers kept altering a deal and the Braves eventually got tired of it. can you blame them? in that time period if they had known that Peavy really didnt want to come to ATL in the first place and wanted to play for the cubs im pretty sure Kelly Johnson would have been traded to the Cardinals for Ludwick at that time. Instead we missed out on that deal and possibly some others that we may never know about.
Vasquez:
Tyler Flowers was blocked by McCann at C and if he moved to 1B he is blocked by Kotchman and Freeman. therefore the only position left is DH something the Braves dont have since they are in the NL. So in that sense he was expendable. not to mention he is 22 i believe and hasnt even cracked AA yet.
Lilli:
Showed his true value at the ML level as a backup/utility guy. plus he is blocked by Escobar and we have another SS in the system.
Gilmore:
not that great
the only thing i think might bite us is the reliever we sent them.
if you look at that stuff FW has done all he could. He already stated he didnt want to sell the farm for one person when there is so much talent in it. Nor would it be wise to have gone to a rediculous price for AJ when he is so injury prone.
So honestly why all the bashing?
Posted by: drumzalicious | December 17, 2008 at 08:56 PM