![]() |
|
|
| |
« Odds and Ends: Thorman, Sabathia, Pettitte | Main | Astros Sign Doug Brocail »
Rays Index points us to a Danny Knobler report that indicates the Rays are willing to trade shortstop Jason Bartlett. Not only that, but the Rays had brief talks with the Twins about acquiring Delmon Young or Denard Span.
With Reid Brignac posting a .299 OBP in Triple A and Tim Beckham a year removed from high school, it'd be surprising if the Rays dealt their starting shortstop.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e201053632c3b8970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Rays Willing To Trade Bartlett?:


|
|
The Rays want Delmon Young back and are shopping Bartlett?
Quite odd.
Posted by: icedrake523 | December 02, 2008 at 03:53 PM
you've got to be kidding on this one. seriously?
Posted by: Jon Elliot | December 02, 2008 at 03:55 PM
Dye for Bartlett???
Posted by: soufside4life | December 02, 2008 at 03:58 PM
That has to be rare. has there ever been another incident of a team trading a player one year and then trading back for him the next?
Posted by: basicslop | December 02, 2008 at 04:00 PM
Ditto w/both above posts. Young, lazy and arrogant and Bartlett, whom might be considered unpopular with some opposing players, but gives everything he has and is a gamer, along with a steady glove and fair bat.
Rays do not have much cash to spend and DH/RF seems to be the primary positional need, besides looking for a closer if one can be found for the right price.
Posted by: johns | December 02, 2008 at 04:00 PM
This is last year switshed around. It should be Rays willing to trade Young? Not only that but have asked about Matt garza and Bartlett.
Posted by: soufside4life | December 02, 2008 at 04:00 PM
Maybe that's why Bartlett was named team MVP despite posting a horrible season both offensively and defensively. They want him to look better to other teams.
Posted by: MorneauVP | December 02, 2008 at 04:01 PM
"Dye for Bartlett???"
Only if Chicago pays 3/4ths of Dyes salary. Why fix Chicago's SS with a controllable glove for the forseeable future and take on Dye's bloated salary and his aging knees, when there are numerous other bats available via free agency?
Posted by: johns | December 02, 2008 at 04:02 PM
smith might need to send friedman his innocence if he gets delmon for cheap since he will have been brutally abused. damn...
Posted by: SBS0311 | December 02, 2008 at 04:04 PM
Beckham has all the tools but who knows how many years away he is.
Brignac is meh. Decent prospect, got hype from a nice cal league season. Improved his d since then but his offense has slipped.
Why trade Bartlett????
Posted by: Kenan and Kel | December 02, 2008 at 04:07 PM
Span is WAY better than Young. However, there's no way the Rays trade their starting shortstop for an outfielder.
Posted by: Haymaker | December 02, 2008 at 04:09 PM
I can see this happening becuase Jason Bartlett is up for arbitration and might climb to $ 2 million a year for 2009. I would think that Denard Span actually makes the most sense since he played an outstanding right-field in the last series against the Rays last year at the Trop.
But do not forget that Ben Zobrist is a great shortstop too who got pushed out of a possible starting role by the Bartlett trade last season.
Rays Manager Joe Maddon also thinks highyl of "Zorilla" as an offensive weapon in 2009.
But taking back Young would be a huge error for the Rays. You do not need a aloof player in an energetic clubhouse.
Posted by: Rays Renegade | December 02, 2008 at 04:15 PM
"...despite posting a horrible season both offensively and defensively"
What?
I can see the offensive part, with his low OBP, though "horrible" is way too strong as he does steal bases and hits for average. But defensively? That's crazy, he's the best defensive shorstop in the league dude.
Posted by: rememberthecoop | December 02, 2008 at 04:16 PM
Tim just read your chats they are excellent!!!
Posted by: Cyyoung | December 02, 2008 at 04:18 PM
There is absolutely zero chance that the Bartlett for Young rumor is anything but BS. There is not a single feasible reason for the Rays to want to do that.
Posted by: 0bsessions | December 02, 2008 at 04:21 PM
"it'd be surprising if the Rays dealt their starting shortstop"
I hear they could get Lugo back cheap.
Posted by: Little Bear | December 02, 2008 at 04:23 PM
If Young were traded for Bartlett I would pull my hair out...the Twins would have given away Garza for Brendan Harris - whom they don't seem to think is even capable of being half of a 3B platoon, given their talks with Casey Blake.
Posted by: Breaker | December 02, 2008 at 04:23 PM
look at it this way, if the rays get young for bartlett, they basically got Matt Garza for free. BRILIANT! Another fleecing of the twins. As a Giants fan, this would warm my heart a little
Posted by: Longing for Manny...Burriss that is!!! | December 02, 2008 at 04:23 PM
"That has to be rare. has there ever been another incident of a team trading a player one year and then trading back for him the next?"
Doug Mirabelli comes to mind.
Posted by: Little Bear | December 02, 2008 at 04:24 PM
"Span is WAY better than Young."
Thats debatable.
Posted by: Kenan and Kel | December 02, 2008 at 04:25 PM
This has to be a joke, or complete hear-say. No-way the Rays trade away Bartlett - he won't net anyone who would be an improvement in the OF or DH, and would just open another hole at SS (Brignac's not ready, and could end up just being a super-platoon player).
Posted by: ray-jay | December 02, 2008 at 04:26 PM
Where do I sign?
Posted by: twinsfan | December 02, 2008 at 04:27 PM
Ok.
SS may be the 1 position we have depth in except for 1 little issue. Brignac is not ready and Beckham is 3 years away IF he kills in the minors.
If we do this, then in 2009, we will either have Ben Zobrist(not a fan at all) or the unready Reid Brignac as the starting SS. I don't like it.
One thing to think about is what the deal would wind up as.
Matt Garza
Eduardo Morlan(well if he isn't taken in the Rule V or is returned)
for
Brendan Harris
Jason Pridle
I mean.....a raping but Delmon is a punk that we got rid of for a reason and Span is incredibly meh. I want a PROVEN OF and we can trade one of our 20,372 SP's to get it.
Posted by: RaysFan | December 02, 2008 at 04:30 PM
Somewhat off topic, but to answer basicslop's question, the White Sox traded Gio Gonzalez to the Phillies in the Jim Thome trade, then re-acquired him in the Freddy Garcia trade, only to send him to Oakland in the Nick Swisher trade.
Which begs the question - Jermaine Dye for Gio Gonzalez? jk.
Posted by: mymrbig | December 02, 2008 at 04:37 PM
""Span is WAY better than Young."
Thats debatable."
No it isn't. Laugh at him and move on.
If the Twins for some ridiculous reason are willing to give up on Delmon, snatch him back as fast as possible.
Posted by: ArodSucksAtLife | December 02, 2008 at 04:37 PM
Did you get a look at the guy who wrote the article? He looks like someone you can't trust.
Posted by: rememberthecoop | December 02, 2008 at 04:37 PM
Eh, this guy reported it, could be lying, could be telling the truth.
But according to him, it was the RAYS who inquired on Young or Span, so, yeah, if true the Rays would trade for him.
Posted by: twinsfan | December 02, 2008 at 04:51 PM
"No it isn't. Laugh at him and move on."
Some of us don't base player evaluations off of a half year. Young has much more talent than Span. He also has minor league numbers to back it up. It's VERY debatable if Span is better than Young.
Some of you are overvaluing Bartlett to say the least. Grittiness and heart is great, but it doesn't win games.
Posted by: CubbyFan23 | December 02, 2008 at 04:55 PM
Ok...I don't really care but since when did Delmon Young catch the tag as a "Young, lazy and arrogant" according to "Johns"?
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 02, 2008 at 04:59 PM
I think when it comes down to it you have to admit that Span and Young would likely end up with similar trade value, although it would be for different reasons.
Span will be 25 next season, but in 347 at bats posted a 294/387/432 line for a contending team down the stretch, while playing good defense and showing some pretty good plate discipline. This was his debut so he still has a lot of service time left.
Young is obviously the more talented of the two, he was the #1 pick in the draft and rated #1 in the BA handbook as a prospect, but in two full seasons has yet to display his stunning talent in a productive way. His numbers were much better after the all star break (297/345/432) but he still hasn't performed yet. His defense in left field wasn't even very good, and he's already used up a good deal of his service time.
It's close, but the argument that Span is better may be very well be valid. Young has yet to break out in two seasons, and he's still only 23 and has huge potential so he's a great buy low guy, but Span seems like a likely long term high OBP, solid power/speed, plus defense outfielder for someone, likely Minnesota.
Posted by: scribbletone | December 02, 2008 at 05:09 PM
"Ok...I don't really care but since when did Delmon Young catch the tag as a "Young, lazy and arrogant" according to "Johns"? "
He didn't catch it, he's had it follow him since High School, essentially. Here's some linkage:
http://www.baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=5021
http://mlb.fanhouse.com/2007/09/30/delmon-young-yanked-for-disrespecting-the-game/
http://www.sptimes.com/2007/09/30/Rays/Sour_end_to_Delmon_s_.shtml
Young's always been a complete punk and, talented though he may be, his attitude problems are worrisome, to say the least.
Posted by: 0bsessions | December 02, 2008 at 05:24 PM
Thank you Obsessions, was just digging up some of Young's more colorful escapades. He does have a tendency for being a bit different than most ballplayers eh? Kind of like another Rays exiled to washington last year named Elijah Dukes
Posted by: johns | December 02, 2008 at 05:31 PM
Bartlett to the Tigers for Thames?
Also, don't the Rays still have Ben Zobrist? He could be the starting shortstop.
Posted by: Rob M. | December 02, 2008 at 05:45 PM
The Rays could always be the "mystery team" in on Furcal. That would give them the ability to trade Bartlett for whatever comes back.
Posted by: DodgersBruin | December 02, 2008 at 05:55 PM
"It's close, but the argument that Span is better may be very well be valid. Young has yet to break out in two seasons, and he's still only 23 and has huge potential so he's a great buy low guy, but Span seems like a likely long term high OBP, solid power/speed, plus defense outfielder for someone, likely Minnesota."
Totally agree that you can make a case. However, to say that you CAN'T make a case for Delmon being better than Span is pretty ridiculous.
Posted by: CubbyFan23 | December 02, 2008 at 05:56 PM
Are you kidding me the Rays are looking into trading Bartlett? He was there MVP by far last year. With out him they wouldnt even have made it to the playoffs.
Posted by: #1BaseballFan | December 02, 2008 at 06:04 PM
They traded Delmon Young for a reason.
Posted by: #1BaseballFan | December 02, 2008 at 06:04 PM
"Totally agree that you can make a case. However, to say that you CAN'T make a case for Delmon being better than Span is pretty ridiculous."
I never said that. I never even came close to saying that. Where'd you get that?
Posted by: scribbletone | December 02, 2008 at 06:08 PM
Wonder if F. Liriano is available
z
Posted by: arod13 | December 02, 2008 at 06:25 PM
"Some of us don't base player evaluations off of a half year. Young has much more talent than Span. He also has minor league numbers to back it up. It's VERY debatable if Span is better than Young."
Some of us lack the basic reading comprehension skills, which permit us to understand that ArodSuckatLife was clearly agreeing with me.
:/
Posted by: Kenan and Kel | December 02, 2008 at 06:43 PM
"but Span seems like a likely long term high OBP, solid power/speed, plus defense outfielder for someone, likely Minnesota."
After roughly half a season Span already seems like a legit starting outfielder?
Posted by: Kenan and Kel | December 02, 2008 at 06:45 PM
A .387 OBP in 400 plate appearences when you're 24 years old is impressive. You don't do that by accident. I'm not saying he's good for a .380-400 OBP, but if he can become a .280/.360/.430 player with good defense, then he is a good player while he's still very cheap, which is a couple seasons.
Posted by: scribbletone | December 02, 2008 at 07:26 PM
Bartlett was a consistent glove throughout the year. When he was hurt the Rays were hurt.
Posted by: #1BaseballFan | December 02, 2008 at 07:28 PM
"Span is WAY better than Young."
That is laughable. Span had an excellent call up, but doesn't possess near the talent Young does.
Posted by: AA | December 02, 2008 at 07:55 PM
My point was that D. Young is far more talented, but whatever.
Posted by: ArodSucksAtLife | December 02, 2008 at 07:58 PM
Anyone who thinks the twins would consider young or span for bartlett is fooling themselves. For one they cant do it from a pr standpoint. There is no way the twins are fleeced like this. Remember it was the Rays inquireing not the other way around. If we are willing to trade guys like Span and Young it will be in a package for a legitimate SS ie Yunel Escobar or JJ Hardy, not Bartlett who we have already had and evaluated and will never be more than a mediocre SS, While guys like Span and Young have Super star potential
Posted by: Den_Orath | December 02, 2008 at 08:20 PM
Den Orath is right. You don't sell players for ten cents on the dollar, especially if they're still cheap (this is referring to Young). Span for Bartlett does not help the Twins either IMO, with Cuddyer around.
#1BaseballFan- You and I both know that MVP award was a joke. A MF joke. Bartlett is a mediocre hitter with a mediocre glove.
Rays Renegade- Oh. Zobrist is NOT an option for SS. He is an absolute butcher in the IF and gives back the runs he produces
Posted by: melonis rex | December 02, 2008 at 09:07 PM
I wonder how much salary Detroit would be willing to eat to trade Magglio Ordonez....
The Rays have two very interesting, arbitration eligible, trade pieces that could attract the Tigers: Edwin Jackson and Jason Bartlett. They also have guys like Wade Davis and Jeremy Hellickson if the Tigers want more upside, but further away. I wonder if a REALLY sweet deal for Magglio Ordonez could be put together, with the Tigers eating about 5-6MM worth of salary. Why do I say this? Because Maggs patrolling RF/DH in Tampa would be awesome, and if someone offers really good talent, the Tigers NEED the talent and youth for their team.
Posted by: melonis rex | December 02, 2008 at 09:16 PM
Rays=furcals mystery team? I doubt it but it sort of fits the build unless you consider how unlikely it is for the rays to sign a player like furcal.
Posted by: walkoffblast | December 02, 2008 at 09:19 PM
I agree with Rob M. If Tampa is looking for an OF power bat, then it's possible they have interest or would become interested in Thames.
Posted by: Calriver | December 03, 2008 at 12:25 AM
Rex, what would be the point of that from a Tigers standpoint? Trading one of your best players and eating their contract is not a smart move unless they're a problem in the clubhouse. The Tigers only want to move Ordonez because of his salary, why would they move him if the move doesn't resolve that salary problem? I'd vaguely understand it if the Tigers got back a controllable high upside player, but the deal you're talking is a return of a garbage pitcher (The Rays worst starter, no less) and an offensively mediocre short stop. That would be complete idiocy on the part of the Tigers, especially considering their current needs. Talk about lopsided. The Tigers could get SIGNIFICANTLY better return on him.
Posted by: 0bsessions | December 03, 2008 at 07:45 AM
Just not a fan of Delmon Young's ONE walk in 126 ABs in his first season. He hasn't improved on his plate discipline much since then. (62 walks in 1346 career at bats) Span drew 50 walks in 347 ABs, which is pretty impressive for a youngster. Granted, Span's minor league numbers never blew you away, but he did very well last year in the bigs.
I'd also expect more power from Young at this point. He's like 6'3"/205 - so you'd think he'd at least be able to keep up with Pedroia's home run totals. lol
Time will tell, but I'd rather have Span than Young. Oh wait, I forgot... Young CAN nail an umpire in the chest with a flying bat from 20 paces!! What an arm!!
Posted by: Haymaker | December 03, 2008 at 08:59 AM
"He's like 6'3"/205 - so you'd think he'd at least be able to keep up with Pedroia's home run totals. lol "
That seems like an unrealistic expectation to me. Pedroia could take an eephus pitch thrown behind his head and hit it over the Green Monster...from the Metrodome...with the roof closed...without a bat.
Posted by: 0bsessions | December 03, 2008 at 10:53 AM
They Rays defense has improved drastically since 2007 to 2008 due to the fact of Jason Bartlett. I dont know how many times I would see a ground ball go towards the shortstop in 2007 and it would go through because you had a bunch of nobody's playing shortstop. The trade of Bartlett improved every infielders defense esp. Akinori. Bartlett made his transition from 3rd to 2nd easy.
The Rays need to resign Rocco. Turn Edwin Jackson into your closer and package a deal with Sonnastine to the Tigers for Magglio.
Posted by: #1BaseballFan | December 04, 2008 at 10:49 AM
Bartlett had one of the top fielders percentage in the American League. He gets on base for this big hitters being in the 9th Spot
Posted by: #1BaseballFan | December 04, 2008 at 10:51 AM