![]() |
|
|
| |
« Return to Yankees "Doubtful" For Pettitte | Main | Orioles In "Serious Contention" For Kawakami »
According to Tracy Ringolsby of the Rocky Mountain News:
The Yankees are looking to move two from a group of outfielders of Xavier Nady, Nick Swisher and Hideki Matsui. The Angels, Texas, Oakland and Atlanta are considered to have interest.
Joel Sherman has noted that the Braves attempted to acquire Swisher from the White Sox before the Yankees did. The Angels seem content with their outfield. Sherman and Ringolsby both seem to think the Yanks prefer to retain Johnny Damon.
Sherman cautioned that the "glut of hitters" remaining on the free agent market will make it more difficult for the Yankees to move one of their corner guys. From the emails I receive, Yankees fans would most like to see Matsui dealt. Perhaps he will be, but I believe his current trade value is negative. 34 years old, full no-trade clause, $13MM salary in '09, September knee surgery and a questionable ability to play the outfield.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e2010536956d35970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Yankees Outfield Surplus:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
There's no way the DOdgers make that deal for Kemp. Please let's not even make any Kemp proposals as it will only anger evey non-Yankee fan (see Cano for Kemp rumors). But Kemp is the kind of player you build a team around and I don't think we have anything that they desperately need that can help them immediately.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 27, 2008 at 12:48 PM
I agree Arod. Swish can be a future LF/RF for us seeing as how we might lose all 3 of our OF next year. I don't think the Yanks need to go big time again next year (No Holliday). I think w/ Swisher and one of Gardner/Melky/Austin Jackson could be a good start and then you pick up a corner and either another DH type or go after a C like Bengie Molina and move Posada to DH OR maybe something even bolder like a Khalil Green and move Jeter to DH? Yeah I know he's not putting up the prototypical DH power numbers.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 27, 2008 at 12:52 PM
The Braves lineup would be deadly if the Braves could deal for both Nady and Swisher maybe something like
Braves get:
Nady and Swisher
Yankees get:
Hernandez, Prado, Redmond, and Valdez...maybe more
Posted by: BravoMan | December 27, 2008 at 03:05 PM
But that probably wont happen. The Braves could substitute Nady for Matsui in the deal. Maybe that would influence Kawakami to join the Braves.
Posted by: BravoMan | December 27, 2008 at 03:08 PM
If Matsui was substituted for Nady in that deal, I would think Anderson/Blanco would be substituted for Hernandez and probably drop Redmond from the deal or substitute a lesser prospect for him too
Posted by: bravesfan23 | December 27, 2008 at 03:35 PM
Yea but I dont think the Braves would go throgh all of that with the high paydays that come with Matsui. They should use that money for pitching. They still could go after Lowe if they wanted to. If not then a Kawakami or Garland to go with Smoltz. If they decide against the Yankee outfield idea I'd go after Burrell, but that's just me. A two year deal would be fine. Most of those outfield prospects we mentioned earlier wont be ready til two years anyway...
Posted by: BravoMan | December 27, 2008 at 04:10 PM
You are correct. I really don't see the Braves having any interest in Matsui espically with his contract, injury problems, defense, and hitting left handed. I mean the Braves say they aren't interested in Dunn, a guy thats almost a lock for 40 hrs, because of defense and he hits left handed. Dunn could probably be had for as much or maybe a little more than Matsui is set to make next year. I'm also with you on saving money for pitching because , in my opinion, you have to have pitching to win because in this game, it doesn't matter how many runs you score because if your pitching gives up more runs than you score, you still lose.
Posted by: bravesfan23 | December 27, 2008 at 04:36 PM
the only problem with trading for both is that neither one is a true CF. Yea our lineup would be alot better but our DEF in CF would be not to great.
I would just leave it at one.
Also possibly trade them Matt Diaz if they want someone a little more experienced with more power potential than anderson/blanco
Lineup like
1. Shafer/Anderson CF
2. Escobar SS
3. Chipper 3B
4. Swisher LF
5. McCann C
6. Frenchy RF
7. Johnson 2B
8. Kotchman 1B
I mean if either Nady or Swisher had good CF DEF we would look like
1. Escobar SS
2. Swisher CF
3. Chipper 3B
4. Nady LF
5. McCann C
6. Frenchy RF
7/8 Kotchman & Johnson
IF the braves wanna risk some DEF in Center for some Offense then it might not be TOO bad.
Posted by: drumzalicious | December 27, 2008 at 04:52 PM
I like the 1st lineup better drumzalicious, I think we need the speed at the top of our lineup and escobar thrives in the number 2 spot. I don't think it's too bad of a lineup myself. If Francoeur bounces back were capable of 3-4 runs a game easily.
Posted by: BravoMan | December 27, 2008 at 05:10 PM
I also like the first lineup. However, Swisher really isn't the masher we need in the 4 hole, so I think they might go ahead and let McCann hit 4th and Swisher hit 5th or even swap them up depending on if the starting pitcher is righty or lefty. Just a thought.
Posted by: bravesfan23 | December 27, 2008 at 05:20 PM
Although I do think acquiring Swisher would be a very solid move my the Braves and it would improve the team. Jus wanted to make sure my last post didn't make people think i was against the Braves getting swisher. I am very much in favor of the move.
Posted by: bravesfan23 | December 27, 2008 at 05:22 PM
I agree. I heard Wren was trying to get Swisher before the trade to the Yankees so look for this topic to heat him in a few days. Yea he wasn't exactly the cleanup hitter I was thinking of either but it's better than nothing. The real question is the Braves final starting pitcher spot. Lets say they aquire Smoltz and Swisher, then who will fill that final spot. Lowe? Kawakami? Sheets? Or will it be someone like Malhom through trade? Ive puzzeled over this for a long time.
Posted by: BravoMan | December 27, 2008 at 06:00 PM
If its a free agent i would prefer sheets. i just have this gut feeling that Lowe is gonna go down this season and a few more times over the length of the contract he wants. If we are going to take an injury risk on a pitcher i say take sheets. less time in a contract since he only wants 2 years. plus when he is on he is more dominant than Lowe. i highly doubt lowe will put up the same numbers this year as he did last.
I'll take sheets.
Also why not move chipper to the clean up and put swisher in the #3? i feel as though that would get swisher some pitches to hit seeing as how people wont want to face chipper especially if he keeps hitting like he did last year.
Posted by: drumzalicious | December 27, 2008 at 10:12 PM
Sheets could be a gamble but so is life. He'd be a cheap ace but he is an injury bug. We do need an ace though...And hopefully the Braves get the Swisher deal done. There has been talks of the Giants offering Sanchez for one of these yankee outfielders. I like the chipper cleanup idea tho...and having switch hitters in a 3-4 punch his a rare comodaty these days
Posted by: BravoMan | December 27, 2008 at 11:07 PM
The only thing I would worry about with Chipper moving to the cleanup spot is they moved him to th 4 hole a few years ago, but he said he always felt more comfortable hitting 3rd so they moved him back. I'm afraid it might be a mental thing for Chipper and as a Braves fan im sure you know that how well we do this season offensively is going to ride heavily on Chippers shoulders.
Posted by: bravesfan23 | December 28, 2008 at 02:32 AM
i think we need to let them fiuiguera it out
Posted by: ryno | December 28, 2008 at 06:20 PM
I don't like any of these trades. The trade that won't go away is Melky for Mike Cameron. Cameron's veteran presence would really help Brett Gardner and he'd definitely fit into the mix and feed off the rest of their now explosive offense with the Texeira signing. Cameron gets maligned for his hitting because of his 130 Ks a year, but this is a guy who once hit 4 HRs in a game with Seattle. Melky for Cameron remains on the table and hopefully it'll get done. Melky Cabrera has shown that he has a slow bat and will never hit much with the Yankees so it's time to move him. Keep Matsui, Damon, Swisher and Nady. They're an excellent outfield core and I think Swisher will be a big impact player for the Yanks.
Posted by: ashistabula | December 28, 2008 at 11:57 PM
OK, the three of them suck, but the only one with any game is nady, if they could get rid of the other two, maybe one of them for jonathan sanchez that would be great. And a deal with the braves for one of their young kids like jojo reyes could work.
Posted by: RK | December 29, 2008 at 11:58 AM
I still don't see the Braves aquiring Nady but I bet they'll deal for Swisher. The Giants could deal Sanchez for Nady.
Giants get:Nady
Braves get:Swisher
Yankees get:Sanchez, Prado, and prospects
Posted by: BravoMan | December 30, 2008 at 03:13 PM