![]() |
|
|
| |
« Padres Re-Sign Scott Hairston | Main | Red Sox Still Working With Jason Varitek »
Dejan Kovacevic of the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette reports that the Pirates have had trade talks with the Yankees regarding outfielders Nick Swisher and Xavier Nady.
Kovacevic, however, goes on to say that there is "little cause to expect a deal involving either coming to Pittsburgh," noting that Swisher is due $22MM over the next three years and hit just .219 last season. A Nady deal is even less likely because the Yankees will demand top young talent; and the Pirates should be in full rebuilding mode.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e2010536bf056c970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Pirates Talk Nady, Swisher With Yankees:


|
|
"A Nady deal is even liss likely because the Yankees..."
you made a mistake on liss. Its supposed to be less.
Its okay, we all make mistakes lol
Posted by: MDG25 | January 08, 2009 at 07:36 PM
um.. what was the point of this post your saying is unlikey they will give up any young talent?
"little cause to expect a deal involving either coming to Pittsburgh,"
Posted by: patrick | January 08, 2009 at 07:38 PM
the Bucs traded Nady to the Yankees, it would be pretty weird to see them trade him back there
the Yankees should just see if the A's want Swisher back and they could play him at first base and bump Daric Barton back to AAA ball
I mean we all know they're going to go after Holliday after the season is over, especially if they don't win the World Series, this way they can have Nady for the 1yr until they can sign Holliday
Posted by: MDWhiteSoxFan | January 08, 2009 at 07:39 PM
The Pirates are talking to the Yankees about players they have no interest in. Is this a non-story?
Posted by: paxterj | January 08, 2009 at 07:39 PM
They can trade Nady to Pitt for...Karstens & Ohlendorf :)
Posted by: yankeegirl49 | January 08, 2009 at 07:40 PM
trade nady for players they gave up for him was that a joke?
Posted by: patrick | January 08, 2009 at 07:41 PM
So why was time wasted even writing this article?
Posted by: JudgeNY | January 08, 2009 at 07:43 PM
would be stupid for the pirates to take nady back and i would be pissed if the A's took swisher back and let go of young talent
Posted by: atheleticsNbraves | January 08, 2009 at 07:43 PM
"trade nady for players they gave up for him was that a joke?"
Yes..it was.
Posted by: yankeegirl49 | January 08, 2009 at 07:50 PM
I'd take Tabata back in a heartbeat. bucs won't give him back now, though
Posted by: ArodMVP217 | January 08, 2009 at 07:50 PM
i would take McLouth a heartbeat.
Posted by: patrick | January 08, 2009 at 07:54 PM
This has to be the funniest rumor seen yet and if it is true (doubtful) and that idiot Huntington actually gave up any kind of decent prospect package for a 1 season rental of Nady, after getting taken to the cleaners in the original trade... Well, Pirates fans should build a public scaffold is putting it mildly...
Posted by: johns | January 08, 2009 at 07:55 PM
The Yanks never should have traded Jose Tabata, anyway. He is a top-100, likely top-50 or better, prospect in the game today. I didn't get the deal then, and I still don't. Then again, Cashman isn't the first GM to regret a deal.
Posted by: soxfan93 | January 08, 2009 at 07:56 PM
Is Nady going to be a type A? If he is then he has value to any team acquiring him that has no plans to sign him.
Posted by: Bernie Brewer | January 08, 2009 at 08:02 PM
They said on MLB's Hot Stove tonight that the pirates haven't had a winning season since 1992. Shouldn't they have something to show for all those draft picks by now? The Pirates were once a great team, but there is something seriously wrong if the ownership and management can't turn things around. It has to be tough to be a Pirates fan right now.
Posted by: Jeff Levy | January 08, 2009 at 08:02 PM
Sorry about that, Baseball America ranked Tabata as the 37th best prospects in MiLB back in February.
Posted by: soxfan93 | January 08, 2009 at 08:05 PM
That was all they gave up for 1 1/2 seasons of Nady and Marte sixfan93. Marte was (and still is) one of the better lefty relievers in the game and nady gave them a healthy and productive outfielder at a time that they did not have one. In short? The Yanks would have fallen out of contention much earlier, like August without nady and that was why they had to get him and why not when the only cost was Tabata, at that time an A ball guy with tremendous upside and Ohlendorf? Coke and Kontos have struggled.
Posted by: johns | January 08, 2009 at 08:05 PM
The Yanks never should have traded Jose Tabata, anyway. He is a top-100, likely top-50 or better, prospect in the game today. I didn't get the deal then, and I still don't. Then again, Cashman isn't the first GM to regret a deal.
Posted by: soxfan93 | January 08, 2009 at 07:56 PM
Well now, hold on. If the Yanks hold on to a previously high-ranked prospect (i.e. Hughes) both the team and their fan base are accused of "overvaluing their prospects... again." Yet if we move them before they start to develop any of their promise, it's a terrible decision.
Tabata WAS highly plugged. But in his second full year of A ball his power numbers declined rapidly while those of Austin Jackson skyrocketed, making Tabata expendable.
At the time of the trade every single column I read described it as a clear win for the Yanks. Now, Tabata hit 2 HR in the 5 games he played for PIT in the Gulf Coast after the trade, but that doesn't necessarily mean he got his stroke back. And even if he has, in the Yanks' mind they were moving him when his hype hadn't fully gone away yet, though his talent had yet to live up to it.
Posted by: cdg02001 | January 08, 2009 at 08:07 PM
I wish the Yankees could get a Mulligan on the Nady/Marte trade.
Posted by: Rich | January 08, 2009 at 08:11 PM
The Pirates have been "rebuilding" my entire life. I seriously was like 5 when Leyland and Bonds were in the playoffs together.
Get a new owner/GM Pittsburgh, you deserve way better.
Posted by: Will Smiff | January 08, 2009 at 08:12 PM
johns,
Can you please explain how the Pirates got "taken to the cleaners" in the original Nady trade?
Posted by: jrfukudome | January 08, 2009 at 08:14 PM
It really ticks me off that Nady was an awesome player in Pittsburgh and New York doesn't even care to accept him. He deserves better than to play with those greedy bums, I guess because he's not making 10M he should be off the team. Pittsburgh should get Cano and Nady, we'd be able to appreciate both of them.
Sorry, just a rant. While I'd like to see Nady in Pittsburgh, it wouldn't make much sense to trade much of value for him. But it would be nice to see him here for a year and try to make a run, then maybe get some draft picks when he leaves.
Posted by: bigpat | January 08, 2009 at 08:15 PM
yankeegirl,
How is that a joke? If the Pirates traded Karstens and Ohlendorf back, they would have gotten Tabata for 200 ABs of Nady. Or would the joke be on the Yankees?
Posted by: jrfukudome | January 08, 2009 at 08:15 PM
That's true. However, I think the Yankees could have gotten a much better OF for Tabata from a rebuilding team. Just my opinion. I like Nady, but... Is it me, or does it seem like he's been around forever? Lol.
And Johns, my mistake. I did actually forget about Damaso Marte.
Posted by: soxfan93 | January 08, 2009 at 08:16 PM
Whoops, so did I.
Posted by: jrfukudome | January 08, 2009 at 08:22 PM
It really ticks me off that Nady was an awesome player in Pittsburgh and New York doesn't even care to accept him. He deserves better than to play with those greedy bums, I guess because he's not making 10M he should be off the team. Pittsburgh should get Cano and Nady, we'd be able to appreciate both of them.
Sorry, just a rant. While I'd like to see Nady in Pittsburgh, it wouldn't make much sense to trade much of value for him. But it would be nice to see him here for a year and try to make a run, then maybe get some draft picks when he leaves.
Posted by: bigpat | January 08, 2009 at 08:15 PM
You're talking about a 30 year old who was a ~100 OPS+ player for his career up until last year who, though a beast for the first half in PIT, finished batting .260 for the Yanks. Where you see an amazing player who "finally clicked" the Yanks front office MAY (remember these are rumors) see a man coming off a career year whose trade stock will never be higher.
Being "greedy bums" has nothing to do with it. We love our underpaid youngsters - check on as many threads on this website as you want to find other fans accusing Yankee fans of overestimating Wang, Cano, Joba, and Hughes's worth.
There's a reason X has played for 4 teams in 4 years.
Posted by: cdg02001 | January 08, 2009 at 08:25 PM
jr...I had forgotten about Tabata.
I was making a joke, because the original story..is kind of a non story.
Posted by: yankeegirl49 | January 08, 2009 at 08:26 PM
soxfan93: I would've liked to hold on to Tabata as well but we did get 2 players we needed in Nady and Marte while we tried to make a run for the playoffs. People talk about Nady's drop in avg and obp but he still hit 12 hrs and drove in 40 runs, both of which were 2nd to only Arod on the team.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | January 08, 2009 at 08:28 PM
"johns,
Can you please explain how the Pirates got "taken to the cleaners" in the original Nady trade?"
I did in original post! Marte and Nady both were highly sought after at the 7/31 deadline this past season and both went in the same deal for:
Ross Ohlendorf
Dan Mckutchen
Jeff Karsten
Ohlendorf may actually turn into a good setup guy soon, he throws hard, just has to learn to throw strikes. Karstens may at best top out as a #4-5 guy from what he did last season, Tabata is a decent OF prospect and the jury is a long ways out on Mckutchen, all the while both Nady and Marte could have brought premium prospects by themselves, instead of wild and hard throwing relievers, late 20's supposed prospect starter like Karsten and low A ball prospects.
It was and still is highway robbery.
Posted by: johns | January 08, 2009 at 08:36 PM
Out of the 4 prospects Tabata and to a much, much, lesser extent, McClutchen were the only ones I ad reservations on. However, the Yanks got a guy who performed well for us and could do again in 2009. Karstens is a AAAA/5th Starter/Long relief guy at best and O'dorf thros hard but was hammered in the majors. He MAY develop into a decent relief guy, but remember he was a SP who failed to live up to expectations.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | January 08, 2009 at 08:41 PM
johns,
I disagree. Not when salary relief and the short periods of control that the Pirates had (1/2 year and 1 1/2 year). Sure it may have been risky, but Tabata is a real piece and may even turn out to be a still. Plus the Pirates, perenially short on arms, added two that were near-ready. It's at least debatable.
By the way, whether one can actually "steal" Nady and Marte is another topic of discussion. You may be overvaluing them a bit.
Posted by: jrfukudome | January 08, 2009 at 09:05 PM
I don't see any deal going down. The Pirates are in "rebuild" mode and I doubt they're going to want to give up the kind of prospect(s) it would take to get Nady. And Swisher seems to be owed too much over the next few years for the Pirates to be happy about.
Posted by: Agent | January 08, 2009 at 09:07 PM
It's funny, the Pirates shop these guys and get absolutely blasted for asking for the moon, then they make a trade and they didn't get enough? It's a no win situation with fickle fans. Nady was overachieving and Marte had a whopping 6 mill option that was declined. Pirates management got what they could and moved on. We'll see if the genius Cashman does any better trading Nady and Swisher.
Posted by: indybucfan | January 08, 2009 at 09:18 PM
and i heard Manny was going to sign with Boston too.
come on this trading either to the Pirates? Why cause Pirates are going to compete this year?
Posted by: Zack | January 08, 2009 at 09:28 PM
C'mon now guys...
Enough of the Sox fans calling the Nady deal stupid because of Tabata.
The Yankees needed a bat and a lefty reliever to make a run -- and they traded 4 AAAA guys and Tabata for it.
Nady made their lineup much more formidable with Posada and Matsui both out. Marte struggled, but he fills a need they've had for years.
Tabata is going to be 20...and has already gone through the runaround of being THE GUY. Ruben Rivera was the same hype and never became anything. The Yankees could have had anyone they wanted for Rivera and hung onto him... Tabata struggled with personal issues throughout the year, and even walked out on the team at one point. Patience only lasts so long when you are getting solid offers for a projectable talent with a bad attitude putting up bad numbers. Austin Jackson had surpassed him long ago on the OF pipeline hierarchy anyway.
Posted by: at4inthemornin | January 08, 2009 at 09:45 PM
I recall reading a story about Tabeta wanting out of the yankees around the begining of the 2008 season.Perhaps that is the season Cashman was willing to throw him into the deal.
Posted by: yankeefan235 | January 08, 2009 at 09:59 PM
Tabata was a sensitive kid who couldn't handle the pressure of being a rising star.
Once he went to Pittsburgh, his numbers went way up.
He hit .248 in the minors for the Yankees.
Posted by: at4inthemornin | January 08, 2009 at 10:01 PM
Nady hit .310 w. 25 HRs and 97RBI last year.
when offered that and Marte's potential lefty shutdown ability for a 19 project and a bunch of scraps... you take it.
Posted by: at4inthemornin | January 08, 2009 at 10:03 PM
why do i keep reading the yankees need pitching? if were gunna trade nady or swish try to get atleast one premium outfield prospect? i mean man you pay everyone else you cant just pay pettitte 3 million more and call it a day? they dont need anymore pitching they got plenty coming up what do you guys think??
Posted by: Aj | January 08, 2009 at 10:44 PM
The Yankees DO need another starter. CC, AJ, Wang, Joba and Hughes sounds great on paper....but Aj, Joba and Hughes all are slightly injury prone. They need an innings eater in the #4 slot...put Joba in the #5 so he can skip a few...and leave the 22 year old Hughes in AAA to have a solid year and grow as a pitcher.
The pitching the have coming up is mostly solid pen arms. (Melancon, Sanchez, Robertson, DeLaRosa, Coke, Cox, etc)
Posted by: jjyankeesfan2 | January 08, 2009 at 11:07 PM
why do i keep reading the yankees need pitching? if were gunna trade nady or swish try to get atleast one premium outfield prospect? i mean man you pay everyone else you cant just pay pettitte 3 million more and call it a day? they dont need anymore pitching they got plenty coming up what do you guys think??
Posted by: Aj | January 08, 2009 at 10:44 PM
They have Ajax who is almost ready and OFers are easy to obtain in FA. In fact, Holliday is available next winter.
Pitching is always a need. However, they don't need a pitcher who had a horrible second half after being implicated on the Mitchell report. I think the Yanks want that rotation spot for Hughes to A) See if he's going to be a major league pitcher and B) To boost up his stock since he and Kennedy have gone down in value.
This reminds me of the Torre offer. It seemed pretty clear that the Yanks had enough of Torre but still offered him a contract.
Posted by: strikethree | January 08, 2009 at 11:14 PM
The reason I was pissed about the Nady trade last season involving Tabata was because the Yankees were clearly out of the playoff picture. It was obvious we were not catching the Rays or Sox and it had nothing to do with getting another legit bat, it was because our rotation consisted of a worn down Pettitte, Ponson, Pavano, and Rasner. You are not making a playoff run when those are the guys taking the ball for you. Tabata did struggle at his first year of AA, but many prospects hit a speed bump along the way and he was only 19 this past summer.
I was able to cope with trading Tabata and some other decent prospects though because I realized Nady was only 29 (now 30) and fit nicely in our lineup after watching him play. I have no clue why the Yankees would give up that much (it may not seem a lot to fans of other teams) for a half a season rental. I really don't see the Yanks getting back what they gave up for Nady.
I highly doubt this article has any legitimacy...but if it does and the Yanks are seriously considering trading Nady back to where we got him from 6 months later, they better be looking at Nate McLouth in return. I know it would take a ton to get him but I'm sorry why would you go out and spend heavily to get Nady then trade him back for nothing. Nady, Kennedy, Coke, Melky, Aceves for McLouth and another role player. If they spin Nady for any less to the pirates I would be very angry after a great offseason.
Posted by: yanks09 | January 08, 2009 at 11:19 PM
Honestly the Yankees do not need pitching. If a major injury occurs than the Yankees will have to deal with it, otherwise you do not need another ace caliber pitcher for the 5 spot. 90% of teams in baseball would be drooling to have the opportunity to put Joba or Hughes as their #2 or #3 starter. Hughes was once hailed as the best prospect in baseball, and barring a freak hamstring injury might already have a no hitter under his belt. Its time to see what the kid has. Everyone thinks pitchers just come out of the minors and start hurling shutouts right away. Developing young pitching is a process. It was a process with Lestor, it was a process with Beckett, it was a process with the best names in the game like Johan, CC, Halladay. The fact that the Yankees have a chance to develop Hughes while pitching in the least stressful spot in the rotation is a blessing. Hell if half the teams in baseball had Hughes he would be entering 2009 as their ace.
Posted by: yanks09 | January 08, 2009 at 11:28 PM
If the Yankees trade either nady or swisher, they are going to regret it come June-July-August Yankee fans. You have to realize that neither Matsui, nor Damon is going to remain healthy playing in the field and are you REALLY willing to bank on Cabrerra showing any of the talent he supposedly has in the bigs with his bat? He hasn't yet and how will it look come some prolonged stretch this summer when both Cabrerra and Gardner are forced to start honestly? Can the rest of the offense carry those 2?
Posted by: johns | January 08, 2009 at 11:35 PM
"Honestly the Yankees do not need pitching." I would agree with that, other than a #5 starter and a long man/emergency guy for whenever Burnett may go down again. Are the Yankees going to rely on Hughes/Kennedy duo again? After spending all that money on big name FA's, regardless of the fact money came off the books and leave gaping holes in a rotation?
Posted by: johns | January 08, 2009 at 11:38 PM
The reason I was pissed about the Nady trade last season involving Tabata was because the Yankees were clearly out of the playoff picture. It was obvious we were not catching the Rays or Sox and it had nothing to do with getting another legit bat, it was because our rotation consisted of a worn down Pettitte, Ponson, Pavano, and Rasner. You are not making a playoff run when those are the guys taking the ball for you. Tabata did struggle at his first year of AA, but many prospects hit a speed bump along the way and he was only 19 this past summer.
I was able to cope with trading Tabata and some other decent prospects though because I realized Nady was only 29 (now 30) and fit nicely in our lineup after watching him play. I have no clue why the Yankees would give up that much (it may not seem a lot to fans of other teams) for a half a season rental. I really don't see the Yanks getting back what they gave up for Nady.
I highly doubt this article has any legitimacy...but if it does and the Yanks are seriously considering trading Nady back to where we got him from 6 months later, they better be looking at Nate McLouth in return. I know it would take a ton to get him but I'm sorry why would you go out and spend heavily to get Nady then trade him back for nothing. Nady, Kennedy, Coke, Melky, Aceves for McLouth and another role player. If they spin Nady for any less to the pirates I would be very angry after a great offseason.
Posted by: yanks09 | January 08, 2009 at 11:19 PM
That's false. When we received Nady and Marte we were only 3 games behind Tampa and 2 games behind Boston. This was a good trade. Theres no reason we have to trade him. Hopefully we keep him and he becomes a type-A free agent and we offer arb to receive draft picks.
Posted by: Dynasty26 | January 08, 2009 at 11:45 PM
Nady has value if he's type A agent and has a decent-good year in 09. My guess would be to have a team trade for Nady and then offer him arb. for some draft picks.
With these new FA rules, teams are more likely to trade prospects for rentals. That's what happened with CC, Holliday, etc.
I think the Yanks can get decent players for Nady and others. I don't think it'll just be a deal of Nady though.
Posted by: strikethree | January 08, 2009 at 11:47 PM
There is no need to trade any of these guys unless we are blown away with some position prospects.
Posted by: Dynasty26 | January 08, 2009 at 11:47 PM
"I know it would take a ton to get him but I'm sorry why would you go out and spend heavily to get Nady then trade him back for nothing. Nady, Kennedy, Coke, Melky, Aceves for McLouth and another role player."
McClouth is what 26 ? 27 ? has had one yr. where he's actually hit like an MLB player. Second that is waaaaay too much for a 1yr. wonder in McClouth. If you can trade Nady get a Steven Pearce + Tabata back and an arm nearing FA you do it. You don't overstock for McClouth when Austin Jackson will probably be better than him.
Posted by: Brandon | January 08, 2009 at 11:50 PM
McClouth is an overrated CF. His Uzr rating was way below negative and he is destined for the corner outfield postion. Dont sleep on Kennedy, Hes only 23 and I think he can still be a MLB pitcher
Posted by: Dynasty26 | January 08, 2009 at 11:52 PM
Dynasty I'm glad you pointed that out people in NY like to overrate players outside of NY. They see Nate make a web gem and call him gutty/gritty they don't see how he plays bad routes in CF and yes his Uzr is very bad. The kid is showcased in CF but he really is a Nick Swisher only a bit quicker destined for RF or LF.
Posted by: Brandon | January 08, 2009 at 11:57 PM
Dynasty I'm glad you pointed that out people in NY like to overrate players outside of NY. They see Nate make a web gem and call him gutty/gritty they don't see how he plays bad routes in CF and yes his Uzr is very bad. The kid is showcased in CF but he really is a Nick Swisher only a bit quicker destined for RF or LF.
Posted by: Brandon | January 08, 2009 at 11:57 PM
Exactly, Idk if you ever heard of Mike from MIke and the Mad Dog, but hes a talk show host in the NYc area. Get this, He wanted to trade Hughes and some good prospect or Cano and some prospect to get McClouth to play CF. I tried calling up to rip him a new you know what but it was unsuccesful.
Posted by: Dynasty26 | January 09, 2009 at 12:04 AM
Dynasty & Brandon,
I hope you guys wake up Friday morning and read your posts. Then you will realize how dumb they are.
Call out McClouths Uzr rating....did you forget his gold glove? How many games did you see him play this year? I probably won't be on here tomorrow to see your response, but I hope you get a sense of reality when you wake up tomorrow.
Posted by: The Sobesman | January 09, 2009 at 01:01 AM
Sobesman- Gold Gloves mean nothin we all know that. Yeah McClouth makes diving catches but he was also -40 in the fielding bible rankings, meaning he missed 40 balls that atleast one other CF made. So hope you wake up and see how dumb you are.
he is also too much of a one-year wonder for me to give up Cano or Hughes or any group of top prospects for.
Yankees are giving Melky/Gardner a chance in CF, if by June they arent geting the job done offensively they'll trade for Cameran or Winn or some other one-year guy.
Posted by: Zack | January 09, 2009 at 07:46 AM
The reason I was pissed about the Nady trade last season involving Tabata was because the Yankees were clearly out of the playoff picture. It was obvious we were not catching the Rays or Sox and it had nothing to do with getting another legit bat, it was because our rotation consisted of a worn down Pettitte, Ponson, Pavano, and Rasner. You are not making a playoff run when those are the guys taking the ball for you. Tabata did struggle at his first year of AA, but many prospects hit a speed bump along the way and he was only 19 this past summer.
_________________________
The Yanks were 4.5 games out of 1st place and 1.5 games behind Boston in the wild card race. Matsui was out of the line-up and Posada was hanging in there debating whether or not to shut it down and have surgery or to try and contribute to the offense at less than 100%. One of the biggest problems we had prior to the trade was a lack of offense, especially from the right side with Arod being the only power bat in the line up as a righty. We also needed a lefty in the pen. We didn't add Marte or bring Coke up into August/September. Do I wish we had Tabata in the mix for the 2010 season? Yes. But would I have felt better about it if we made the playoffs? Of course.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | January 09, 2009 at 08:39 AM
The Yankees DO need another starter. CC, AJ, Wang, Joba and Hughes sounds great on paper....but Aj, Joba and Hughes all are slightly injury prone. They need an innings eater in the #4 slot...put Joba in the #5 so he can skip a few...and leave the 22 year old Hughes in AAA to have a solid year and grow as a pitcher.
The pitching the have coming up is mostly solid pen arms. (Melancon, Sanchez, Robertson, DeLaRosa, Coke, Cox, etc)
___________________________
A #5 starter on a 1 year deal would be nice and would allow Hughes to begin the year @ AAA. However, with as many #5 on the market it would not make any since to trade Nady for one. It would make more since for them to wait until a package of prospects are offered to the Yanks. And people who think the Yanks can't get a decent prospect in return are mistaken. We're not going to get 2 blue-chips or anything but if Nady isn't traded before the start of the season, but has a strong 1st half teams with depth in contention will cough up 1 or 2.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | January 09, 2009 at 08:42 AM
I live in pittsburgh an love everything pittsburgh sports. But that does not include the pirates I gave upon them 5 years ago. Mlb is joke rightnow the yanks ruined Pro Sports 400 million dollars when the economy is in the Sh$ter it makes me wana puke.
Posted by: Robsays pirates suck | January 09, 2009 at 10:01 AM
yanks09: "Hell if half the teams in baseball had Hughes he would be entering 2009 as their ace."
Wow! Could you hook me up with your dealer?
Posted by: Little Bear | January 09, 2009 at 12:34 PM
Would it be more appropriate to say the Pirates are in "building" mode considering it's hard to say you've been rebuilding for 15+ years...
Posted by: O'Cey | January 09, 2009 at 01:06 PM
I live in pittsburgh an love everything pittsburgh sports. But that does not include the pirates I gave upon them 5 years ago. Mlb is joke rightnow the yanks ruined Pro Sports 400 million dollars when the economy is in the Sh$ter it makes me wana puke.
____________________
That's the worst comment I ever heard. Just because your team can't afford/or refuses to sign big name FA isn't anyone elses fault.
If the Brewers signed CC for $120 million
or
If the Braves signed Burnett for the $75-$80 mil they were offering
or
If Tex signed with the Nationals or Red Sox for the $170-$180 mil offered....
would that make you feel better? How would that improve the Pirates any or make your world any better?
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | January 09, 2009 at 01:41 PM