« Blue Jays "Have To Be Open To Anything" |
Main
| Trade Candidates: Corner Infielders »
By Ben Nicholson-Smith [July 6, 2009 at 12:10pm CST]
Jon Heyman of SI.com lists his mid-season award winners, led by Albert Pujols and Joe Mauer. Here are Heyman's latest rumors:
- Huston Street alone is worth more on the trade market than Matt Holliday. Dan O'Dowd must be happy with his return, which also included Carlos Gonzalez.
- Jhonny Peralta, Kerry Wood and Carl Pavano are all available.
- Indians GM Mark Shapiro believes he can still get a fair return for Cliff Lee if he deals him a year from now, a few months before the lefty is scheduled to become free agent.
- One executive says the Royals are "pushing" Brian Bannister as a trade candidate. However, they're reluctant to deal Gil Meche and Joakim Soria.
- Pedro Martinez intends to sign soon. We know the Phillies are scouting him. Could there be a match in Philly? The Rays are "thought to be in the mix," while the Yankees are not, even with Chien-Ming Wang's injury.
- There's apparently been "little progress" between the Brewers and D'Backs regarding Doug Davis.
- Nolan Ryan is part of one group trying to buy the Rangers.
If the Braves do decide to trade Yunel Escobar could they include the Indians in a 3 team trade where they get Jhonny Peralta? Something like......
Oakland acquires Yunel Escobar and a mid-tier
Cleveland acquires 1 top prospect from Oakland and mid-tier from Atlanta
Atlanta acquires Jhonny Peralta and Matt Holliday
Seems pretty fair for all sides
Posted by: bravoboy10 | July 06, 2009 at 12:21 PM
"Huston Street alone is worth more on the trade market than Matt Holliday."
I call BS.
Posted by: Know ID yuh | July 06, 2009 at 12:24 PM
I'm not sure actually. Holliday is having an average year and is really showing while still a good hitter, outside of Coors he is a .280/.360/.450 20hr guy. Now he plays very solid defense and runs well, but he is not what he looked like last year. He will likely get a better return than Street if both are dealt, but not substantially.
Posted by: bravoboy10 | July 06, 2009 at 12:35 PM
"One executive says the Royals are "pushing" Brian Bannister as a trade candidate. However, they're reluctant to deal Gil Meche and Joakim Soria."
The Brian Bannister who is 6-6 with a 3.87 ERA after going 9-16, 5.87 in 2008?
Obviously they'd be pushing him, it's a clear sell high.
"Oakland acquires Yunel Escobar and a mid-tier
Cleveland acquires 1 top prospect from Oakland and mid-tier from Atlanta
Atlanta acquires Jhonny Peralta and Matt Holliday"
How about this:
Oakland gets Escobar and Brandon Hicks
Atlanta gets Holliday and Peralta
Cleveland gets Cole Rohrbrough and Henry Rodriguez
Thoughts? I'm not really sure which team doesn't make that deal.
Posted by: scribbletone | July 06, 2009 at 12:36 PM
I like what you said scribbletone, hicks was the guy I was thinking as the mid-tier. It works great for all three sides, but I just checked Peralta's stats and they are way down. Coming into this year he averaged .270/.340/.434 2ith around 20hr and 27rbi. So far this year he is only putting up .254/.331/.366 5hr 35rbi, but all his numbers go up away from Progressive. The change of scenary may do him good. Regardless I'd take my chances and if it doesn't work out we still have Infante.
Posted by: bravoboy10 | July 06, 2009 at 12:43 PM
sorry, with 20hr 75rbi.
Posted by: bravoboy10 | July 06, 2009 at 12:44 PM
I don't see the Braves making that deal. I just can't see them giving up prospects along with Escobar for 2.5 years of Peralta and a half year of Holliday. Using that structure I think you'd have to replace Atlanta prospects with some from Oakland. They are getting the most valuable trade chip in the deal and they're only giving up Holliday and Rodriguez? That seems off to me.
Posted by: nixa37 | July 06, 2009 at 12:44 PM
"Oakland gets Escobar and Brandon Hicks
Atlanta gets Holliday and Peralta
Cleveland gets Cole Rohrbrough and Henry Rodriguez
Thoughts? I'm not really sure which team doesn't make that deal."
Braves don't make that deal IMO.
That deal is lopsided towards the A's.
Now, I'd think that if Brandon Hicks was taken out of the deal, with the A's only getting Escobar (and both A's and Indians chip in cash since Braves can't add payroll), it might be fair for the Braves, but not totally sure.
Posted by: melonis rex | July 06, 2009 at 12:46 PM
"
I don't see the Braves making that deal. I just can't see them giving up prospects along with Escobar for 2.5 years of Peralta and a half year of Holliday. Using that structure I think you'd have to replace Atlanta prospects with some from Oakland. They are getting the most valuable trade chip in the deal and they're only giving up Holliday and Rodriguez? That seems off to me."
I was probably allocating too much value to Holliday.
Take out Rohrbrough and stick in Gio Gonzalez?
So you come out with:
OAK: Escobar and Hicks
ATL: Holliday and Peralta
CLE: Gonzalez and Rodriguez
Oakland gives up Holliday, Rodriguez and Gonzalez.
Atlanta gives up Escobar and Hicks.
Cleveland gives up Peralta.
You're right, nixa37, but does this deal sound more plausible?
Posted by: scribbletone | July 06, 2009 at 12:48 PM
Escobar is worth Holliday plus a prospect, lets be honest his numbers across the boards are better than Hollidays, he plays a position where often offense is a bonus, and he is cost controled for 4.5 years. I think what scribbletone just said is right on.
Posted by: bravoboy10 | July 06, 2009 at 12:52 PM
scribble-
Switch out Gio Gonzalez with James Simmons and the A's make the deal IMO.
And I'd think the Indians would want Simmons more, since their history with "good stuff, meh control" guys like Gio is not good.
Posted by: melonis rex | July 06, 2009 at 12:55 PM
Yeah I don't assign a whole lot of value to Hicks, but Rohrbough just has too much upside to move in a deal like that, despite whatever troubles he's having currently. Assuming Oakland and Cleveland were both kicking in some money that deal seems pretty reasonable. I'm still not quite sure its a move I'd like the Braves to make, but its probably something they'd consider.
Posted by: nixa37 | July 06, 2009 at 12:57 PM
Tribe can hold onto Peralta if they think are going to get Jed Lowrie in exchange from Boston. Like Heyman said, Green has out performed Peralta anyway.
Tribe wants to keep the good pieces and unload the Peralta and struggling Betancourt ones, only problem is these guys need to be producing before they will get much avlue 1st.
Posted by: johns | July 06, 2009 at 12:57 PM
"And I'd think the Indians would want Simmons more, since their history with "good stuff, meh control" guys like Gio is not good."
Fair enough.
I like it, I think we should write it up and e-mail it to Shapiro, Wren and Beane.
Holliday and Peralta to Atlanta.
Escobar and Hicks to Oakland.
Rodriguez and Simmons to Cleveland.
The Braves get an immediate replacement for Escobar that was actually the best SS in the AL last year, as well as a big bopper to make them immediate contenders in 2009.
The Athletics get big time value for Holliday, landing a long term, high-quality shortstop, as well as another young infielder with pop and upside, something they lack even with the recent additions of Cardenas and Weeks.
The Indians get what they've wanted, which is more pitching, and an interesting duo with the fireballer in Rodriguez and the pitchability guy in Simmons.
It's not easy to come up with a reasonable three-way-trade, but I think we might have one here.
Posted by: scribbletone | July 06, 2009 at 01:00 PM
Holliday v.s Escobar
Holliday- 29 years old, signed for 1 year 13.5 million. LF
.273/.374/.419/.793 8hr 43rbi 9/12 sb
Escobar- 26 years old, under team control 4.5 years. SS
.295/.355/.433/.788 7hr 42rbi 3/4 sb
Posted by: bravoboy10 | July 06, 2009 at 01:01 PM
"
Holliday v.s Escobar
Holliday- 29 years old, signed for 1 year 13.5 million. LF
.273/.374/.419/.793 8hr 43rbi 9/12 sb
Escobar- 26 years old, under team control 4.5 years. SS
.295/.355/.433/.788 7hr 42rbi 3/4 sb"
Which is why the Athletics also have to give up two of their better pitching prospects (nice to still hold onto Cahill/Anderson/Mazzaro/Gonzalez/Gallagher/etc.), while receiving only Hicks, a decent but not great prospect, in return.
Posted by: scribbletone | July 06, 2009 at 01:04 PM
I'm with yeah scribbletone, send it to them and if it happens we can share a good laugh. Actually the Mariners GM took fan advice and acquired Ryan Langerhans, granted this a little higher level trade, but still you never know.
Posted by: bravoboy10 | July 06, 2009 at 01:04 PM
Although, bravoboy10, just to point it out:
Holliday: 1.7 WAR
Escobar: 1.2 WAR
So far, in 2009, Holliday has still been the more valuable player.
Posted by: scribbletone | July 06, 2009 at 01:04 PM
bravoboy-
Holliday is still the much better hitter. The Coliseum and Petco are the two absolute worst places for hitters in MLB. Turner isn't a hitters' park, but its not nearly as bad for hitters as Oakland is.
Escobar: .357 wOBA*
Holliday: .369 wOBA*
Holliday is still the better hitter, by a good bit.
Posted by: melonis rex | July 06, 2009 at 01:06 PM
"The Brian Bannister who is 6-6 with a 3.87 ERA after going 9-16, 5.87 in 2008?
Obviously they'd be pushing him, it's a clear sell high.'
You mean the Brian Bannister who had a 5.87 ERA sandwiched between a 3.87 ERA in 07, and a 3.87 ERA in 09?
Not to mention his K/9 is up a whole point from 2007 as well. I'm not going to claim he's setting the world on fire, but you can't just treat him like he's a 5+ era pitcher.
Posted by: cosby | July 06, 2009 at 01:12 PM
I realize and acknowledge he is the better hitter if you compare them side by side, but if you go by there respective positions and financial situations Escobar has more value in a trade than Holliday.
Posted by: bravoboy10 | July 06, 2009 at 01:12 PM
I realize and acknowledge he is the better hitter if you compare them side by side, but if you go by there respective positions and financial situations Escobar has more value in a trade than Holliday.
Posted by: bravoboy10 | July 06, 2009 at 01:12 PM
I don't see the Brewers trading anything of value for Doug Davis. #1, he is not a difference maker. #2, the Brewers/Melvin traded Davis to AZ a few years ago for Jonny Estrada, yes, it was a poor trade, and a money driven one at that, but this is a factor. No way the Brewers now turn around and pay more for Davis in players after already getting the short end the last time.
That is just human nature.
Posted by: BeanoCook | July 06, 2009 at 01:20 PM
"I don't see the Brewers trading anything of value for Doug Davis. #1, he is not a difference maker. #2, the Brewers/Melvin traded Davis to AZ a few years ago for Jonny Estrada, yes, it was a poor trade, and a money driven one at that, but this is a factor. No way the Brewers now turn around and pay more for Davis in players after already getting the short end the last time."
Teams do that regularly though, and teams do the reverse as well (pay lots then sell for pennies on the dollar).
The White Sox did that last offseason. They gave up much, much more for Swisher than they got when they dumped him (nothing)
Posted by: melonis rex | July 06, 2009 at 01:41 PM
"I like it, I think we should write it up and e-mail it to Shapiro, Wren and Beane.
Holliday and Peralta to Atlanta.
Escobar and Hicks to Oakland.
Rodriguez and Simmons to Cleveland."
Sorry to burst the bubble, but I really cant see Cleveland doing it.
Peralta, having an off year or not, is still a 1.1 WARP (about even with Escobar) and is controllable the next 2.5 years. Clevelands cupboard is also rather bare when it comes to middle infielders, (tons of OF or corner guys, but almost nothing in the middle) and the prospects mentioned both have some major concerns. Rodriguez is a BP arm with extreme control issues. And I mean like Rich Hill extreme. While James Simmons is rather mediocre across the board with no signs of improvement over the last three years.
They can get much more trading Peralta away from this move, if they even trade him. And honestly, if they were talking to Atlanta about a deal, they would probably be targeting Escobar themselves.
Posted by: SuzysMan | July 06, 2009 at 01:52 PM
"Not to mention his K/9 is up a whole point from 2007 as well. I'm not going to claim he's setting the world on fire, but you can't just treat him like he's a 5+ era pitcher."
Never said that, just said that it's attempt to sell high on a guy who's not nearly as good as his ERA indicates.
"Peralta, having an off year or not, is still a 1.1 WARP (about even with Escobar) and is controllable the next 2.5 years. Clevelands cupboard is also rather bare when it comes to middle infielders, (tons of OF or corner guys, but almost nothing in the middle) and the prospects mentioned both have some major concerns. Rodriguez is a BP arm with extreme control issues. And I mean like Rich Hill extreme. While James Simmons is rather mediocre across the board with no signs of improvement over the last three years."
The Indians would likely make Asdrubal Cabrera their everyday shortstop, and then Carroll, Valbuena and Barfield could then man second and third. And Carlos Rivero is a pretty good SS in A ball, although he's 3-4 years away.
The idea of the Indians lacking a replacement for Peralta seems like less of a roadblock on the deal than the quality of the pitchers they receive.
I can definitely see how one would consider Simmons/Rodriguez to be a subpar return for Peralta, who as I acknowledged earlier, was the best shortstop in the AL last year.
Posted by: scribbletone | July 06, 2009 at 02:00 PM
Melonis Rex, you misunderstood what I wrote.
The Brewers would be paying top dollar to reacquire a player they got nothing for.
Your Swisher example is of a team that paid a lot for nothing and then traded that nothing for even less.
Show me a team that sells a player when LOW then reacquires the same player when HIGH.
It is dumb. Esp when the player, Davis, is not very talented.
Posted by: BeanoCook | July 06, 2009 at 02:01 PM
"The idea of the Indians lacking a replacement for Peralta seems like less of a roadblock on the deal than the quality of the pitchers they receive."
I am not so sure that would be the case. Let us not forget that the team anticipates competing next year. It might be less of a roadblock, but it will still probably be high on their list of problems they don’t want to create. They would have to hit the market looking for at least one of the two positions, and still have a (most likely) inferior player at the other.
Looking at the roster, it looks as if 2010 would see uncertainty with Sizemore off injury, LaPorta still unseasoned and the possibility catcher will be split between struggling Shoppach and rookie Carlos Santana with a hole at third already and an additional hole being created at second because of the trade.
The lack of value received only compounds the above, and for that I would say Cleveland doesn’t entertain such a move. If they fire Shapiro and hire Bavasi maybe, but not unless that happens :)
Posted by: SuzysMan | July 06, 2009 at 02:27 PM
U CAN NOT GET BOTH HOILLADAY AND PERLOTA FOR ESKOBAR SORRY!
AND STREET IS WORTH MORE AS OF NOW
Posted by: Wrigleyterror37 | July 06, 2009 at 02:35 PM
"Looking at the roster, it looks as if 2010 would see uncertainty with Sizemore off injury, LaPorta still unseasoned and the possibility catcher will be split between struggling Shoppach and rookie Carlos Santana with a hole at third already and an additional hole being created at second because of the trade."
The Indians still have Martinez under contract for 2010, as well as Ryan Garko.
They could try Valbuena at second base and/or resign Jamey Carroll, and the Indians probably don't have the pitching in their organization to contend in 2010 anyways, barring some big moves.
Looking back, you're right, the Indians don't make that move.
But if the Indians do deal Peralta, it would have to be for an MLB ready starter and/or a third baseman.
I don't know why more people aren't concerned about the Indians rotation behind Lee, because no one in that rotation is pitching well outside of him and Pavano, who isn't signed for next season, although Laffey has been decent.
Posted by: scribbletone | July 06, 2009 at 02:39 PM
Well, I was kind of going under the impression Martinez would either be traded, or at least spending most of his time at First. And I really think they dont move Peralta unless they receive a real 2B, SS or 3B prospect. They can use Valbuena, Carroll and Barfield (with Cabrera at Short), but that looks like disaster, lol.
As far as their rotation, they do receive Westbrook back soon. Lee and Westrbook make a solid 1-2. Dont think Reyes gets back till the middle of next year (have him on my fantasy team :( ), but some combination of him, Laffey and maybe Huff (who's stuff is much better then his results) could make a solid enough 4-5 I imagine. That really just leaves a true 3 being needed. I am not sure how it will play out, but I dont think they are in quite as bad of shape as some people try to make it out to be.
Looking at their club, it really seems they have experienced some extreme dumbluck - something you would expect has to reverse at some point. If they dont drastically gut the team, they could probably easily compete in a division full of teams with their own huge question marks.
Hey, their 2010 might look about as bright as our afterall :/ (God why did Hendry sign all those idiotic contracts)
Posted by: SuzysMan | July 06, 2009 at 03:15 PM
"I don't know why more people aren't concerned about the Indians rotation behind Lee, because no one in that rotation is pitching well outside of him and Pavano"
The Indians are, that is why they are probably (behind the scenes at least) wanting either Bucholz, or Bowden and another of the Sox younger arms in exchange for VMart.
Posted by: johns | July 06, 2009 at 03:26 PM
First off I'm A Indians fan who live in Cleveland.
The reason why these deals won't work is because there isn't enough going back to Oakland if they are giving up Holiday and a top prospect they have to at least get back Holliday = 2 draft pics 1- first round and 1 sandwich which will be a 1.A round pick plus back for the top prospect.
So I would think it would be Escobar and 2 good prospects.
I'm not a Simmons fan Scouting report projects him as very hittable and maybe a # 4 type starter.
But I do like Cole Rohrbrough and Rodriguez.
Also most pitchers that the Indians pick up must be at least AA or ready to move from High A to AA as soon as the deal was made. Because we are loaded at A and High A with quality 19 and 20 yo pitcher prospects.
Posted by: baseballnuts | July 06, 2009 at 04:53 PM
If a Victor deal does get done I think it will look like this
Buccholz or Masterson as the center piece with a couple top prospects not named Bowden or Bard you are only going to get 1 of those pitchers in the deal, they arn't going to deal you 2 of them plus prospects for just Martinez IMO.
I Think if a deal gets done it will look something like this.
Buccholz or Masterson
plus
Felix Doubront ( at AA )
Yamaico Navarro ( Shortstop ready for AA )Great glove and can hit also.
Stephen Fife ( Ready for AA )He is a low to mid 90's guy who has high upside.
I think this is a more realistic trade return for Victor than the rumors we have heard in the past.
Posted by: baseballnuts | July 06, 2009 at 05:08 PM
"So I would think it would be Escobar and 2 good prospects."
Escobar is more valuable than Holliday straight up, and it's not really close when you factor in salary and team control.
The problem with the deal, as was later discussed, is that the Indians wouldn't really be receiving what they need in exchange for Peralta, and the Braves including Rohrbrough would be too much talent leaving Atlanta.
In the end the A's would likely have to give up more than they would prefer, in order to satisfy the Indians.
Posted by: scribbletone | July 06, 2009 at 05:09 PM
"But I do like Cole Rohrbrough and Rodriguez."
You dont want Rodriguez, trust me.
Compare his minor league rates to someone with known horrible control problems like Rich Hill. You can see similar huge walk rates to go with the extreme K rates. In the minors, being all over the place you will have hitters swinging. In the majors, they wont. A 10+ K/9 mark doesnt hold much weight when the BB/9 is over 6 or 7. Look no further then his two high-minors lines to see what I mean.
18.1 IP, 5.9 H/9, 15.2 K/9, and 15 Walks for a 7.4 BB/9 in AAA
41.0 IP, 11.2 H/9, 9.4 K/9, and 44 Walks for a 9.7 BB/9 in AA
That is 59 walks in 59.1 IP to inferior hitters. Really puts the 74 K into question knowing how rarely he crosses the plate with a pitch.
Posted by: SuzysMan | July 06, 2009 at 05:16 PM
Next year the Indians infield will be Cabrera at SS and Valbuena at 2B. Valbuena's numbers don't look that great but the organization loves him and his approach. After that you have Barfield (who does seem like he is wasting away), Carrol (who will probably be resigned), Marte (who is finally learning to hit at AAA and still only 25). Prospect wise there is Chisenhall at Kinston where he has played SS, though he doesn't project there. And 1B is a massive jam of prospects and major leaguers.
Peralta won't be held back by lack of depth. I don't think he'll be traded but he easily could be. Someone I think should really be traded is Shoppach. Santana is the C of the future and Shoppach is ridiculously one sided, and that side is K's. Get anything you can for him (pitching preferably) and bring up Toregas to platoon with Martinez until Santana is ready.
Posted by: grimace455 | July 06, 2009 at 06:43 PM
Shoppach shouldn't even be here batting a sub 200 avg he has no value at all back-up catchers are a dime a dozen.
He does have one thing HE HAS 1 OPTION left .
Send his ARSE to the minors and call up Toregas to back -up for now.
Posted by: baseballnuts | July 06, 2009 at 08:29 PM
His option isn't worth the fact that after this year he is arbitration eligible. Sub .200 hitter that strikes out once every 3 at bats and yet he'll probably ask for a million or two. I think the only reason he is still around is that he is Lee preferred catcher.
Posted by: grimace455 | July 06, 2009 at 08:50 PM
Sorry but Victor Martinez is not going anywhere unless the Indians get what they want plus something. The offer would have to blow them away and Shapiro would have to have no doubts in his mind about the deal; which I don't see happening.
Therefore, Martinez is staying in Cleveland and is the face of our franchise.
Ben Francisco, Kelly Shoppach, Ryan Garko, Jamey Carroll, Josh Barfield, Rafael Betancourt, and Carl Pavano are the most likely guys to be dealt before the deadline.
I know Shapiro wants LaPorta everyday in LF, Hafner at DH, and Martinez at 1B as soon as possible. Peralta is our 3B and hopefully Shoppach stays put, if not, next year Santana and Gimenez could be next to get the shot at C.
2,3,4,5,6 will pretty soon be Sizemore, Martinez, Choo, LaPorta, Hafner, Peralta.
GET LAPORTA UP HERE ALREADY.
Posted by: ilulic | July 06, 2009 at 10:22 PM