« Rangers Borrowed Millions From MLB |
Main
| Miguel Angel Sano Rumors: Thursday »
By Ben Nicholson-Smith [July 2, 2009 at 5:08pm CST]
The Mets, Reds, Cardinals, Twins, Cubs, Brewers and Giants could all potentially look for middle infield help. Here are some trade candidates, listed from largest 2009 salary to smallest:
- Miguel Tejada - His $13MM salary would be too much for some teams if the Astros made him available, but his 32 extra base hits and low strikeout numbers sure look good.
- Julio Lugo - He makes $9MM this year and the same amount next year, so the Red Sox would presumably take on salary in any deal. The 33-year-old is hitting .370 since the beginning of June.
- Cristian Guzman - At $8MM this year and next he's not cheap, but he's consistently hit for a high average in recent years.
- Jack Wilson - He makes $7.25MM this year and his team will have to buy him out for $600k to avoid paying him even more in 2010. However, he's a good defender who puts the ball in play and has doubles power.
- Freddy Sanchez - He'll make over $6MM this year and his 2010 option for $8MM will likely vest. It's a lot of money, but the former batting titlist is a better hitter than most middle infield trade candidates.
- Dan Uggla - The most powerful option available may not be available, after all. The Marlins are in it, so they may keep Uggla and his $3.5MM salary.
- Orlando Cabrera - He's posted a .610 OPS this year and he'll make $4MM- not an enticing combination, but the A's are falling far out of the race.
- Felipe Lopez - At just $3.5MM, his .771 OPS looks good, in spite of the big strikeout total.
- Jamey Carroll - As a free agent-to-be on the Indians, he's a candidate to be moved. The 35-year-old has a .735 OPS to go along with his $2.5MM salary.
- Cesar Izturis - He'll earn $2.4MM this year and $2.6MM in 2010. He's on the DL, recovering from an apendectomy, and his slow recovery is making it less likely that he'll be traded.
- Yuniesky Betancourt - His $2MM salary is deceptive, as he's still guaranteed about $10MM before his deal expires. That figure, plus his .609 OPS mean he'll likely be staying put, but he could be had.
- John McDonald - He's barely played at all for the Jays, but McDonald, who makes $1.9MM, could work for a team looking for a defensive specialist.
- Yunel Escobar - He makes just $425k this year and Buster Olney says the Braves would consider dealing him for a bat.
- Blake DeWitt - The Dodgers have Orlando Hudson playing second base, so DeWitt could be expendable. He's making just $405k, but his Triple A numbers are uninspired.
- Adam Kennedy - The A's are just paying Kennedy the major league minimum and he's produced an OPS approaching .800 for them.
Does any one want J-Roll? .205/.250/.319 God I hope he rebounds
Posted by: WeRunTheNLEast | July 02, 2009 at 05:17 PM
Your kidding about DeWitt right? His defense has been the same it was in the majors last yr, at 1B, SS, 3B, and 2B. His bat has been really live. He has been unlucky on his HR totals, only 2.9% of flyballs have been HRs. His strikeouts are down and his walks are up. I dont know what else is expected out of him, as he has just been unlucky on his HR totals, and that has also hurt his average...
Posted by: lakersdodgersyankees4life | July 02, 2009 at 05:32 PM
Riddle me what it would take for the Reds to trade for Escobar. Given the fact that the left side of our infield (whether Encarnacion is there or not) has a Jenna Jameson sized hole, we need a SS who can bat, and bat RH.
Since I'm not privy to the depth at middle infield in the Braves organization, I'm not exactly sure what they'd require in return, but my guess is that the Reddies would make Frazier, Masset, Bailey, Maloney, Soto, Francisco (maybe), Valaika, Sutton, and potentially Wood available for him.
What combo from above would get it done? Maybe, just maybe, they'd throw Alonso in the deal if ATL threw an arm in the deal as well. I think they'd like him as 1B of the future over Kotch(wo)man...
Posted by: Kevin Mitchell is Batman | July 02, 2009 at 06:00 PM
It's going to take a lot to get Escobar from the Braves. If we're just going prospects, it's going to take at least three of a team's top 10 prospects. In the reds' case I think Alonso would have to be included
Posted by: bravesfan22193 | July 02, 2009 at 06:05 PM
Texeira took 3 of a teams top 10 prospects.
Escobar is not Texeira.
I'd do Alonso for Escobar straight up, simply due to Votto being (hopefully) the Reds' 1B for the next 7 years, at least.
Posted by: Kevin Mitchell is Batman | July 02, 2009 at 06:14 PM
Haha you do realize this is completely different. Texeira played 1B not SS which is far more valuable. Texeira had 1.5 yrs left whereas Esco has 3.5 or 4.5 yrs of team control. Tex was already making big money, Escobar is making 400K. It's going to take Alonso+ to get Escobar.
Posted by: bravesfan22193 | July 02, 2009 at 06:20 PM
What about any of the extra Angels infielders?? Could definitely afford to trade one for some middle relief or even prospects with power.
Posted by: rpoabr | July 02, 2009 at 06:25 PM
Texeira took 3 of a teams top 10 prospects.
Escobar is not Texeira.
I'd do Alonso for Escobar straight up, simply due to Votto being (hopefully) the Reds' 1B for the next 7 years, at least.
Posted by: Kevin Mitchell is Batman | July 02, 2009 at 06:14 PM
Escobar is team controlled for the next four years. Tex was a rental.
Anyway, Buster Olney is a complete idiot. The Braves are NOT trading Escobar. Now they probably will trade Kelly Johnson though.
Posted by: BravesAllTheWay | July 02, 2009 at 06:58 PM
"I'd do Alonso for Escobar straight up, simply due to Votto being (hopefully) the Reds' 1B for the next 7 years, at least."
Much easier to find a slugging 1Bman who plays decent defense than it is to find a SS with even a league average bat (guys miscast at the position like Michael Young don't count). Make the two lists. See which one is longer.
Posted by: melonis rex | July 02, 2009 at 07:16 PM
Although I agree with BATW that Escobar won't be traded, at least if Wren has some common sense.
Posted by: melonis rex | July 02, 2009 at 07:17 PM
How about Escobar for Ryan Freel. If the Reds could pick up Freel from the Cubs after DFA, then the Braves would give up Hanson and Escobar for Freel.
I'm just diggin' for gold
Posted by: Nosepicker Eeyore Cox | July 02, 2009 at 07:48 PM
Buster Olney is an idiot the Braves won't trade Escobar he is only making 400k so the Braves will keep him.
Posted by: Brav0s 1 | July 02, 2009 at 08:27 PM
There should be a market for Freddy Sanchez because he should be in the convo for Gold Glove and is back to his batting title form. He would be a great pickup for any team. He is likely to be our all-star. He has earned it.
Posted by: LetsGoBucs921 | July 02, 2009 at 09:22 PM
Buster Onley is an Idiot. Trade Escobar for a bat "dumby" he is a bat!!!!
Posted by: Bravesfansince1990 | July 02, 2009 at 09:35 PM
I still think it would be cool if we saw a good old fashion talent-swap mega deal centering on Escobar, maybe Francoeur and an arm or something for like Choo and Peralta.
The two teams could probably match up well for a deal that would meet all their needs without hurting either. Atlanta doesn’t add much salary, removes a player that doesn’t fit in with the clique and gets the bat they are looking for without sacrificing all production they get from short. Cleveland would get a great looking young player at a premium position, an OF replacement for the short term and an arm with some talent or something along those lines. Wouldn’t hurt them too much if they are trying to compete next year, but would help their club longterm at the same time.
Oh, and we fans would have a big deal to discuss :)
Posted by: SuzysMan | July 02, 2009 at 11:48 PM
I think that it would be awesome if after this year, Freddy Sanchez signs with the Cardinals and plays SS for them. I am sure he can play SS and would be willing to. The Cardinals have a different SS every year it seems and it would be nice if we could give Sanchez a 3-4 year deal. With his great contact and high batting average, he could slide into that number 2 spot right in front of Albert and force the opposing pitchers to actually pitch to Albert.
On the Escobar subject, I don't see Escobar being traded for a long time. He seems like a great SS to me and I don't really think that the Braves would trade him at all. And from reading the Braves fans comments on this subject, sounds like they would be extremely upset if Escobar left. But then again, I wouldn't object at all if he fell into the Cardinals hands.
Posted by: Motley14 | July 03, 2009 at 12:02 AM
"Escobar is team controlled for the next four years. Tex was a rental.
Anyway, Buster Olney is a complete idiot. The Braves are NOT trading Escobar. Now they probably will trade Kelly Johnson though."
Kelly Johnson? Who wants him? Just stand him in linenext to Francouer and Jo Jo Reyes next to all the other useless players Braves' fans think qualify as trade bait.
You do realize that unlike you, Buster Olney talks to Frank Wren in person, right?
As for Escobar, I think Olney is right. I think the Braves WOULD move Escobar for the right hitter. He never said they are trying to dump him, just that they are willing to pay to get quality.
Trades are for making a team better, not for offloading the unwanted players. Sometimes, you actually have to give up something good to get a good player...
Posted by: notin | July 03, 2009 at 12:45 AM
"I still think it would be cool if we saw a good old fashion talent-swap mega deal centering on Escobar, maybe Francoeur and an arm or something for like Choo and Peralta."
A little one-sided towards the Braves. I think Choo is a better player than Escobar and Peralta is a better player than Francouer. I know both are having down years, but for Peralta, at least its an aberration.
Not to memtion Peralta represents a defesive upgrade for the Braves. For all the praise I see on this sight about Escobar's defense, his UZR/150 of -11.9 isn't very inspiring. (Peralta's is +6.4) Yunel's WAR of 1.0 is acceptable, but hardly worthy of the 3 or 4 Top Ten prospects fans seem to think he is worth.
David DeJesus makes for a good match for Escobar,though Escobar at 3 years younger does have more potential to get better. Maybe a deal for Ryan Sweeney might make more sense for the Braves...
Posted by: notin | July 03, 2009 at 01:08 AM
"I still think it would be cool if we saw a good old fashion talent-swap mega deal centering on Escobar, maybe Francoeur and an arm or something for like Choo and Peralta."
I was actually looking at this same possibility the other day. The Braves would have to throw some other stuff in. Peralta and Escobar are basically the same guy age and offense. If they defensive differences as afore mentioned I didnt know. That puts the focus on Francoeur and Choo. You would have to throw a little extra to score the deal. Not a bad swap though.
Posted by: Phillip_Cannon | July 03, 2009 at 01:59 AM
On that note I would much rather Escobar stop acting a fool and remain with the Braves for a long time.
Posted by: Phillip_Cannon | July 03, 2009 at 01:59 AM
I'm surprised there isn't a market for Jack Wilson. I know plenty of teams that could use a good hitting shortstop.
Mariners and Reds come to my mind off the top of my head.
I'm sure he'd be required to sign an extension or pick up his option though
Posted by: Thee4stringking | July 03, 2009 at 07:06 AM
Why is Itzturis on this list? Just because he plays for the Os?
Is there any accounting of system depth or actual team issues in these reports? As far as the Os are concerned, there's pretty much 0% chance Itzturis gets traded this year. He's seen as an offensive and defensive boon. He was among the best bats with RISP in the AL. His recovery hasn't been thought to be slow. The only reason why they're taking their time with him is because Andino's been playing a spectacular glove at short so his absence is not costing games and it allows the club to evaluate a new player. The system has no depth at SS in the minors.
Posted by: basemonkey | July 03, 2009 at 07:51 AM
David DeJesus makes for a good match for Escobar,though Escobar at 3 years younger does have more potential to get better. Maybe a deal for Ryan Sweeney might make more sense for the Braves...
Posted by: notin | July 03, 2009 at 01:08 AM
What?????
David DeJesus = Jeff Francoeur
Yunel Escobar >>>>>>>>> DeJesus
If you will check Escobar's stats from last year he was the 3rd best defensive shortstop in baseball. This year he has dealt with both an oblique strain AND a hip flexor strain. This has limited his running AND lateral movement. When he gets healthy he is one of the best defensive shortstops in baseball. And he already is the 5th best offensive shortstop in baseball. Your proposal is just about as dumb as Braves fans who propose a Jeff Francoeur for Zack Greinke trade.
Escobar would command a similar return in players as a Joey Votto would. He is not as good of a hitter but he plays a more premium position. He is young, inexpensive, and team controlled for four years. And the Braves don't need to trade him. So Reds fans can dream on if they think the Braves would trade him for anything less than an all-star caliber player in return - or a premium package of prospects.
And, no, Olney did not talk to Frank Wren regarding this nonsense about Escobar. If you read his article he said that he talked to "someone" from another organization. However, David O'Brien, who covers the Braves and actually did talk to Frank Wren said that the Braves don't plan to make ANY trades. Wren said that they might add a hitter if they are still in the playoff race at the all-star break. So, it doesn't sound like they plan on subtracting one of the best hitters on the team does it??? Also, Mark Bradley, who also covers the Braves does NOT think that the Braves will trade Escobar. Yes, he is a pain in the neck, but he is a very talented pain in the neck.
Posted by: BravesAllTheWay | July 03, 2009 at 08:35 AM
"Yes, he is a pain in the neck, but he is a very talented pain in the neck."
Bravesalltheway,
No offense, but all the talent if the world physically and being a head case will stop a promising career cold. Lastings Milledge has ran into that problem already as a classic case and is on his 3rd team as a prime example, Delmon Young of the Twins is another that only wants to play up to his abilities 1/2 the time.
Escobar needs to learn to focus his abilities on the field before he will ever be an above average, much yet an elite player.
Posted by: johns | July 03, 2009 at 09:13 AM
Johns, I do agree with you in part. But I don't see Yunel as being anywhere near as bad as Lastings Milledge with regards to attitude. Lastings was always causing problems with his teammates and his managers and coaches. Yunel's problem has always been with the umpires and questionable calls. I don't think I have ever seen him or heard him accused of yelling at a teammate or coach. The incident with the scorekeeper last week was awful so I do hope he learned a lesson with that one.
Lastings and Delmon also aren't performing on the field as well as Yunel. Yunel leads the Braves in both runs and rbi's even though he has missed a good deal of time with injuries. He also has one of the highest batting averages on the team.
Yes, I do agree that he needs to focus. I know he plays with a tremendous amount of passion and flair. But he needs to channel that passion into playing hard....and not arguing with the umpires and scorekeepers. My hope is that his good buddy Martin Prado rubs off on him. I just love how Prado plays. He isn't as talented as Esco....but he makes good use of every ounce of talent that he does have. If Yunel did that, he could very well be the best overall shortstop in baseball.
Posted by: BravesAllTheWay | July 03, 2009 at 09:52 AM
Cubs send Fontenot and one of Fox, Gregg, or Hoffpauer for Utley or Sanchez.
Posted by: Milburn26 | July 03, 2009 at 10:21 AM
Peralta is under team control for 2 more years, while Escobar is under team control for 4. If they are similar in value and age that makes Escobar quite a bit more valuable. Oh and defensively, its sort of silly to argue Peralta is better than Escobar. Escobar has the better natural tools, this is Peralta's first season as a non-negative defender at SS (small sample size perhaps?) and Escobar was among the better defensive SS in the league last year. As someone else mentioned, Escobar has been dealing with injuries that have limited him defensively, and that is likely the reason that his range has gone from 6.6 runs above average in just 126 games last year to 3.5 runs below average in 63 games this year.
Posted by: nixa37 | July 03, 2009 at 10:47 AM
I'll harp on Escobar for making some dumb mistakes, but I wouldn't want the Braves to trade him. His bat is way too valuable in their line-up. Besides, did anyone see that catch he made the other night (7/2) against the Phillies? Wasn't that a webgem?
Posted by: drphonic7 | July 03, 2009 at 10:55 AM
“Peralta is under team control for 2 more years, while Escobar is under team control for 4. If they are similar in value and age that makes Escobar quite a bit more valuable. Oh and defensively, its sort of silly to argue Peralta is better than Escobar.”
I agree with this, and it is why I think a Choo/Peralta for Escobar/Fancoeur/Pitcher (maybe a pretty good prospect) is probably both fair and enticing to both teams. The Indians would have a core of Sizemore, LaPorta, Escobar and Carlos Santana locked in for the next 4+ years to build around. And since SS and C are the two hardest spots to fill, they would be lined up perfectly. Braves don’t lose too much at Short, but drastically improve Right while only sacrificing one prospect.
Not a fan of either team, but just intrigued by the possibility here, lol
Posted by: SuzysMan | July 03, 2009 at 11:54 AM
"What?????
David DeJesus = Jeff Francoeur
Yunel Escobar >>>>>>>>> DeJesus"
Huh? DeJesus is Jeff Francouer? I guess if you ignore OBP and defense and OPS and EQA and RC/27 and, well, every stat beyond SLG and instead use the theory that all outfielders Braves fans don't like are equal to Jeff Francouer, then maybe he is. Though DeJesus is still left-handed.
"If you will check Escobar's stats from last year he was the 3rd best defensive shortstop in baseball. "
That's actually not true. If you check the VOTING RESULTS from the panel at the Fielding Bible (admittedly all better educated than me on stuff like this), Escobar came in third. However, votes are not stats, and if you look at stats like UZR/150, Escobar is not the thrid best in the NL in 2008, since his 1.9 is far less than Jack Wilson (16.7), Jimmy Rollins (15.0) and JJ Hardy (8.5).
"However, David O'Brien, who covers the Braves and actually did talk to Frank Wren said that the Braves don't plan to make ANY trades. "
Well, that didn't last long, huh?
Posted by: notin | July 04, 2009 at 01:03 AM
why would you need to trade away Yunel Escobar for a bat, when you have a defensive shortstop batting .292 with 43RBIs. i dont see a reason to trade away a guy who is locked in for 4 years and making $400k....there is no need to trade him away
Posted by: cano2215 | July 08, 2009 at 09:46 AM
Why is Blake Dewitt even included in this list? He stunk in 2008 and is horrible this year at AAA.
Posted by: Chris | July 14, 2009 at 12:42 PM