![]() |
|
|
| |
« Olney On Potential Non-Tenders And Bradley | Main | Cubs, Jays Talking Bradley For Wells? »
The Giants had a pretty busy day yesterday, re-signing second baseman Freddy Sanchez to a two-year deal, and outrighting lefty Noah Lowry, making him a free agent. Henry Schulman of The SF Chronicle has some more Giants' rumors for us this morning...
Meanwhile, Andrew Baggarly of The Mercury News notes that several of the Giants' core players are eligible for arbitration this winter, including Tim Lincecum, Brian Wilson, Jonathan Sanchez, and Ryan Garko. If Lincecum takes home another Cy Young Award this year, that would be the most awesome first year arbitration case in history.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
$10m easy for Lincecum.
Posted by: bjsguess | October 31, 2009 at 12:37 PM
No to Randy Winn unless he comes on the very cheap and is a 4th or 5th outfielder. We need a more consistent bat in RF.
Garko wasn't really given a fair look, but would he benefit from half a year of consistent starts?
Offer Molina arbitration. If he accepts, we get him for the year we desire before we bring up Posey. If he declines, he's a type A free agent so at least we get a draft pick out of it.
Posted by: Humm Baby | October 31, 2009 at 12:46 PM
There is no way Molina isn't offered arb. It is a win-win, but I would prefer the two picks over a return.
Posted by: lincycum | October 31, 2009 at 01:04 PM
"$10m easy for Lincecum."
I think the Giants can win arbitration if they only offer $8M, basically just don't do what the Phils did with Howard.
Posted by: start_wearing_purple | October 31, 2009 at 01:10 PM
the giants have a lot to do. im really pleased that they signed sanchez. when he wasn't hurt he was really good both defensively and at the plate. and try to sign lincecum to a longterm deal. trade zito and offer him zito's contract. haha
Posted by: a_mccombs | October 31, 2009 at 02:21 PM
A later developing market? Yeah, that's why you signed Sanchez during the World Series. Clearly waiting this one out and playing it close to the vest, aren't we Sabean?
And God help us if Molina comes back. Posey won't get a shred of playing time if Bruce can help it.
Posted by: quincy0191 | October 31, 2009 at 02:24 PM
"There is no way Molina isn't offered arb. It is a win-win, but I would prefer the two picks over a return.
Posted by: lincycum | October 31, 2009 at 01:04 PM"
Well, except for the fact that Posey would be much, much better than Molina and Molina would be getting over 6 mil.
But, on the flip side you're right. If he accepts it is only for one year, and if he decliend they'd get a pick.
Posted by: R y a n | October 31, 2009 at 02:26 PM
Yeah, make it very clear to Molina that Posey is the starting catcher, and then offer arb.
"Some level of conversation" with Molina?
"Expected to make a run" at Jason Bay?
Sounds like Sabean moves to me.
Posted by: melonis rex | October 31, 2009 at 02:40 PM
how much i don't want posey behind the plate next year. it wouldn't hurt to see molina helping out next year. the only thing is that that takes money for the Possibility that we might sign a bigger bat. but with sabean, i doubt we will
Posted by: a_mccombs | October 31, 2009 at 02:45 PM
All the folks who don't want Molina back next year, and want to see Posey have legitimate gripes with the way Molina clogs up the base paths. But unfortunately, Sabean has to look at it quite simply: will Buster Posey put up 18-20 HRs and 80-85 RBIs next year? The answer is no. He may in 2-3 years from now, but he won't next year. And Sabean has to consider what eliminating Molina's offense and handling of the pitching staff does to the team before anything else.
If the team had power and RBIs coming from other spots in the lineup already, then he could afford to lose production from the catcher spot. But he doesn't. That's why the Giants will offer Molina arbitration and see what happens.
He won't be back as the #4 or #5 hitter, but I'm willing to bet Molina will be back for 2010 as the #6 or #7 hitter on this team.
Posted by: Steve Soto | October 31, 2009 at 03:31 PM
Steve Soto,
How do suggest that Posey gets the chance to develop into that guy then? He's absolutely slaughtered pitchers in the minors and its fairly obvious he has nothing more to learn from facing minor league pitchers. Besides that, I would venture to say that Posey is more than capable of putting up better numbers than Molina right now. Better players equals more runs, which equals more wins.
Posted by: BF91 | October 31, 2009 at 04:13 PM
Offering arb to Molina would be a huge mistake (he might accept!) and it isn't clear that the team will make this colossal blunder.
also, when guys liek Schulman say the Giants are expected to make a run at Bay, he really should say who has these expectations. W/o major victories in arbitration (or via backloaded contracts w/ those guys) the team won't be able to afford Bay w/o raising payroll significantly and there's no reason to believe they'll raise it over their usual $90m.
Posted by: nostocksjustbonds | October 31, 2009 at 05:43 PM
no one is giving up a first round pick for Molina. Molina knows this so accepting arb. will be his best choice and then the Giants have to try and trade him.
Posted by: Cody | October 31, 2009 at 06:21 PM
Steve Soto,
Molina is one of the worst offensive players in all of baseball and offers nothing special defensively; any player in baseball will accumulate "80-85 RBIs" when they are constantly plugged in to the cleanup spot of a lineup. Posey has nothing left to prove against minor league pitching and will be making close to a league minimum salary in 2010, leaving at least another $5 million that would have gone to Molina to spend on positions of greater need.
Time to look beyond HR's and RBI's, bud.
Posted by: spliff(TONE) | October 31, 2009 at 06:35 PM
Posey needs Catcher's Experience. He only caught 100game in minor league session.
But Molina is too expencive....How would you other FA catcher?
Posted by: BarryBonds.jp | October 31, 2009 at 07:21 PM
Molina has power but is one of the absolute worst players in baseball at getting on base. He swings at everything, but doesn't have the type of eye-hand coordination to make it work like Vlad or Sandoval. Posey has the potential to plug right in and be better offensively than Molina. Also, Molina has grown very lazy behind the plate. He still has a great arm, but can't block to save his life.
Posted by: AA | October 31, 2009 at 08:23 PM
I would go out for a catcher in making that are ready. I would go for Cervelli in the Yankees orginazation, since Montero seems ready as soon as Posada steps down, and it seems that the Yankees believe that Montero>Cervelli right now.
Also, is Pablo Sandoval the Switch hitting Pujols of the future at third base? I don't expect sandoval to hit as many homers or be the same caliber, but they seem to have the same approach, and they both are five tool players for the most part.
Posted by: I coulda been a contender | October 31, 2009 at 09:49 PM
There are going to be an awful lot of catchers available this off season, not like last year. Probably Shoppach, Navarro, Snyder, Olivo. It could be really dangerous to offer this guy arbitration, even though he is probably better than most all, with the exception of maybe Shoppach.
Posted by: johns | November 01, 2009 at 04:53 AM
molina one of the worst offensive player? a bit extreme. he's slower than my dead grandma, but other than sandoval, he has knocked in more runs than anyone else on the giants. thats not saying much, but he's not one of the worse players in baseball. russell martin could have been possibly the worst catcher in the NL this year.
Posted by: a_mccombs | November 01, 2009 at 06:33 PM
For those that think Posey will drop right into the lineup and be a consistent producer from day 1, well please pass around whatever it is you're smoking. There is very little doubt in my mind that he has the potential to be a Maeur type player but he still needs time to grow as a hitter and needs a lot mroe experience behind the plate.
With that said, if Sabean can go out and sign a couple of bats for the #4 and #5 slots in the lineup, i think that will take enough pressure off Posey (The Annointed One) to let him grow at the ML level, instead of down in AAA. That would be the one situation you hand him over the job, otherwise you either deal with Whiteside who plays good D, has a strong arm but wont add much to your offense or you sign a decent FA guy who might not be as good as Molina but can be had at a low cost, 1 year contract.
Also consider this... Our starters have always had a lot of praise for Molina's game calling. There is definitely a certain mojo there and you never know if switching Molina out for a kid that still needs some growth in the game calling department will screw up the the connection the starters have with their catcher. If Molina was at any other position or if Posey was more developed i think this would be a no brainer, but the catcher position is easily the hardest and most demanding position on the diamond and until they develop a stat that measures how well of a game caller someone is, there will always be a huge question mark about young catchers that dont have a lot of experience in the minors behind the dish.
Posted by: Lincecum_Says_GSP | November 03, 2009 at 03:02 PM