![]() |
|
|
| |
« Jim Riggleman Named Nationals Manager | Main | Offseason Outlook: Texas Rangers »
1:41pm: O'Brien says Hudson received a three-year, $28MM deal - $9MM annually plus a $1MM buyout on the option.
8:41am: The Braves announced Tim Hudson's extension today, according to Dave O'Brien of the Atlanta Journal-Constitution. He says it's a three-year deal worth around $9MM per year, with an option for 2013. Hudson's new deal overwrites the $12MM mutual option he had for 2010.
Yesterday, MLB.com's Mark Bowman wrote, "We've long known that the Braves are going to end up trading either Derek Lowe or Javier Vazquez." O'Brien feels that Kenshin Kawakami is another possibility. Bowman suggests that the Yankees or Angels could be suitors for Lowe, should they decide not to sign John Lackey. Vazquez could be extended if Lowe is moved.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
Solid. Just waiting to see the numbers.
Posted by: bbxxj | November 12, 2009 at 08:50 AM
Lowe for Swisher?
Posted by: csg | November 12, 2009 at 08:54 AM
That's right, Lowe's great! Come & get him Yankees. You can aford, no problem.
Posted by: drphonic7 | November 12, 2009 at 08:54 AM
Derek Lowe certainly doesn't have the health risks that Lackey does. For a team that already has an ace and a half like the Yanks a 'short' three year contract to a veteran who gives you 200 solid innings and 33-34 starts could very well be desireable.
If the Braves added a few very solid (not Heyward, Schafer, Teheran class) legit prospects I wonder if we could aquire Nick Swisher. He set to make 26M over the next 3 years (with the option picked up) so the difference is only 16M over three years.
Posted by: bbxxj | November 12, 2009 at 09:00 AM
Trade him to the yankees for 2 decent prospects as a salary dump. Use 15 million to go after Chone Figgins (10 mil a year) Resign gonzo to close and sign laroche at 2 years 16 mil... Figgins plays outfield until Heyward is ready then plays 2nd with Prado being utility and Figgins is Chippers eventual replacement at third. He is also the long awaited answer at leadoff.
Posted by: hobie222 | November 12, 2009 at 09:02 AM
I can't imagine that the Yankees would want to trade Swisher, they already need to find a new left fielder and DH.
If the Braves could get Brett Gardner and dump Lowe's contract, that alone would be a brilliant move by Wren.
The odds that the Braves can get a potentially impact bat in exchange for Lowe are extremely low, unless they're willing to take on a similarly poor contract.
If the Braves can dump Lowe's contract without eating much money, they should, but he's likely to bounce back at least somewhat next season, so they shouldn't go out of their way to deal him.
If dealing Lowe involves eating siginificant money, then they may be better off moving Vazquez for a solid return.
Posted by: scribbletone | November 12, 2009 at 09:04 AM
I just took a look at his Home/Away splits to see how much of Swisher's power was supplied by that stadium and I came away pretty suprised:
Home
.226/.382/.394/.776 8HR
Away
.268/.361/.585/.945 21HR
Swisher's ability to play LF/RF/1B is also a big plus.
Posted by: bbxxj | November 12, 2009 at 09:07 AM
I still don't get what the rush was to re-sign Hudson when the Braves already had 5 starters under contract. I would have liked to see Wren take care of the other needs first. However if the end result is Lowe is traded and his spot in the rotation goes to Hudson, then I could live with that.
Posted by: Ron Edwards | November 12, 2009 at 09:07 AM
I still like the Lowe for Bradley deal. How close to the contracts match up?
Posted by: holycow | November 12, 2009 at 09:12 AM
"The odds that the Braves can get a potentially impact bat in exchange for Lowe are extremely low, unless they're willing to take on a similarly poor contract."
Yeah, most Braves fans aren't delutional enough to think that Lowe can be flipped for an impact bat. However if we added enough propect value to nearly get Swisher by itself Lowe could be added to finish the deal.
"If dealing Lowe involves eating siginificant money, then they may be better off moving Vazquez for a solid return."
I feel like I've gone over this too many times. Vazquez won't fetch an impact bat because of his lack of matches. He is too expensive for a small-market or rebuilding team, he has failed often in large markets in the AL, and he cannot be traded at all to 1/3 of the MLB. Certainly he could be flipped for prospects somewhere like Milwaukee but trading away your staff ACE for specs doesn't help a team who wants to win now.
Posted by: bbxxj | November 12, 2009 at 09:13 AM
"I still don't get what the rush was to re-sign Hudson when the Braves already had 5 starters under contract."
I don't see how you can turn away a TOR starter who was willing to take a below market value contract. You can ALWAYS trade pitching if you need to.
Posted by: bbxxj | November 12, 2009 at 09:15 AM
I would think that the Yankees would rather hang on to Gardner and give the Braves Melky, especially if they come with hat in hand looking for a salary dump.
Posted by: BaseBallz | November 12, 2009 at 09:26 AM
Joba & Hughes are penciled in as the #4 & 5 starters in spring training, there is no room for Lowe.
Posted by: Gleb | November 12, 2009 at 09:32 AM
Im really hoping for someone better than Swisher...Lowe may be over paid based on his 2009 season, but based on his past 3-4 years its not so bad. Would I have paid him $15 mil for so long? No, but his contract is far from unmovable. I believe there are 5-6 teams that would take him off our hands and give us a couple decent prospects and/or a good bullpen arm..I would be fine with us signing Laroche to a 2-3 year deal and using Freeman and a couple lower level guys to get a big time young OF bat. Wren was great last offseason and I expect the same this offseason. He will get the job done.
Posted by: bennie2323 | November 12, 2009 at 09:35 AM
Joba & Hughes are penciled in as the #4 & 5 starters in spring training, there is no room for Lowe.
I don't know if cashman is really sold on Joba or Hughes being a solid 4/5 in the rotation. Having Joba in the Pen may be more valuable to the Yankees than in the rotation if they do get Lowe as the 4th SP with Hughes as #5. Though no doubt Yankees are a intriging match up for Lowe salary dumb for spects/Melky/Gardner type trade. We will have see what developes in FA market
Posted by: BravoFan3736 | November 12, 2009 at 09:42 AM
You're delusional if you think Lowe and his 45mil contract can get Swisher.
Posted by: R y a n | November 12, 2009 at 09:42 AM
Lowe is a solid #2 starter and a very good #3 starter. If the Yanks miss on Lackey they could have a great deal of interest in Lowe. As a GM I would take Lowe and his contract over Swisher and his...although I would be many would say it's probably a wash...
Posted by: bennie2323 | November 12, 2009 at 09:47 AM
The Lowe for Swisher trade is a joke... right? Baseball is a business, not a charity. The Yankees aren't going to take on a bad contract AND trade a good starting RF.
If the Yankees want Lowe and agree to take on most/all of his contract, than the Braves are getting a low level prospect at most.
I don't see any of this happening, though. I believe Cashman when he says that he wants to get younger. If that's a main goal, it makes no sense to sign an aging pitcher that's under contract for 3 years. He's not a bad pitcher at all, but there are much younger options out there.
Posted by: Agent | November 12, 2009 at 09:48 AM
"Joba & Hughes are penciled in as the #4 & 5 starters"
Joba and Hughes suck.
Posted by: Land-Man | November 12, 2009 at 09:49 AM
Lowe isn't terrible, and while I do think he'll bounce back, the point of trading him is to free up that $15 mil to spend elsewhere.
And this may be a little off topic, but on the LaRoche front, if Adam wants more than 2 years, let him walk & sign Overbay for a year. His contract's up at the end of 2010 anyway. Regardless, keep Freeman.
Posted by: drphonic7 | November 12, 2009 at 09:49 AM
No way the Yankees will trade for Lowe it makes no sense when Lackey is on the market. I think the Yankees will go after Lackey and lock him up like they did for Sabathia and Burnett. This is what the Yankees rotation will look like when spring training rolls around:
1. CC Sabathia
2. AJ Burnett
3. John Lackey
4. Andy Pettite
5. Chamberlain/Hughes/Gaudin
Lowe might go to the Angels considering the two teams have made trades in the past but I wonder what the Braves will get in return? Here's what the Angels rotation will look like:
1. Derek Lowe
2. Jered Weaver
3. Ervin Santana
4. Scott Kazmir
5. Erik Bedard
Thoughts? Oh and sorry for any misspelling.
Posted by: Whalersfan | November 12, 2009 at 09:50 AM
I still think Lowe for El Caballo could work good. The Astros need starting pitching (Wandy may be good but he can't carry the whole team) and Carlos Lee would look damn good in a Braves uni!!!
Posted by: NYBravosFan | November 12, 2009 at 09:56 AM
Whalersfan...I honestly don't think the Yankees are gonna sign Lackey. They need to figure thier outfield out first. They need to figure out whether or not they wanna resign Damon and Matsui and they need to tell Gardner that speed isn't everything and that he'd better start hitting or have fun in Scranton. And teams that need pitching and have the money for it aren't gonna wait around for the Yankees to get over the World Series win and start making some decisions. there are plenty of teams out there that need outfield help and will likely pounce on Bay, Holliday and Lackey before the Yankees do.
Posted by: NYBravosFan | November 12, 2009 at 10:01 AM
Why in the world would the Braves want Swisher. He is horrible. The guy was in a loaded lineup and got a little better numbers this past year. But look at his career stats. There is no way the Braves want Swisher. Now I could see them signing laroache or maybe going after Gonzalez from the Padres.
Posted by: thad | November 12, 2009 at 10:05 AM
@whalersfan
I doubt the Angels will go after both Lowe and Bedard. I think its an either or situation considering they still have Joe Saunders and he is a very servicable pitcher.
Posted by: ericbrat20 | November 12, 2009 at 10:05 AM
Swisher has a career avg of .245. He strikes out a lot and he has no speed at all.
Gonzalez has career avg of .281 and he has hit homes of 30, 36 and 40 in the last three years. He is under contract for a reasonable salary for 2 more years and could be picked up in a trade easily.
Posted by: thad | November 12, 2009 at 10:09 AM
I do agree that the Yanks will give us prospects at most for Lowe, which is why I do not think they are a good match up for us. The Angels would want us to take GMJ...Financially it would be a win for the Braves, but talent wise I would want something else. One of there young bullpen arms would probably work. GMJ hasnt been very good last 2 years and Im not sure he's an upgrade over anything we can put out there now, but a trade of Lowe isnt going to be easy and Im assuming we will have to take a bad contract in return.
Posted by: bennie2323 | November 12, 2009 at 10:10 AM
Weren't there some rumors about a possible Derek Lowe for Luke Scott trade? I don't know if that would be a good fit for the Orioles, considering Lowe's contract and his ERA last year, but I feel like it has been discussed.
Posted by: colaz | November 12, 2009 at 10:14 AM
@thad
Obviously Gonzalez is better than Swisher no one was arguing that but to get Gonzalez expect to give up at least 2 elite prospects (like Hanson and or Heywood).
Posted by: ericbrat20 | November 12, 2009 at 10:15 AM
Thad... what in the wide world of sports makes you think that Gonzalez "could be picked up in a trade easily"? We are not giving up the farm for him. Swisher makes since, because we don't need an every day player. Even though The Yankees are going young, Lowe is a proven and durable veteran. He's also a ground ball pitcher. I don't think it'd be an even swap, but I can see it happening.
Posted by: NL_East_Rivalry | November 12, 2009 at 10:17 AM
Heyward* my bad
Posted by: ericbrat20 | November 12, 2009 at 10:17 AM
"Why in the world would the Braves want Swisher. He is horrible. The guy was in a loaded lineup and got a little better numbers this past year. But look at his career stats. There is no way the Braves want Swisher. Now I could see them signing laroache or maybe going after Gonzalez from the Padres.
Posted by: thad | November 12, 2009 at 10:05 AM"
How about because he has great plate discipline and good power?
He isn't a star, but at this point in his career it is likely Lowe isn't either. Swisher is a great role player.
Posted by: R y a n | November 12, 2009 at 10:23 AM
Just throwing this out there.
Braves trade Derek Lowe and Kelly Johnson to Cubs for Derek Lee and Fotenot.
Then Braves trade Fotenot Kris Medlen, and Jordan Schefer ( yes he had his chance plus he is not going to be a big time MLB talent player an Average at best) to the reds for Brandon Phillips.
Next step would be either get Garret Anderson back or try and gamble on Nady. I think either or would be good enough til Heyward gets there. Plus with Dlee and Brandon Phillips coming in the power and hits are going to come.
Then make a choice between Gonzo or Soriano.
That team would be pretty golden.
Posted by: Rono840 | November 12, 2009 at 10:27 AM
i dont know if the yanks would even want lowe...
but Rono, i would kill to have brandon phillips.
Posted by: bravesphanatic | November 12, 2009 at 10:43 AM
Rono840 is this a joke? Why would we take on more money with lowe and trade you a blue chip player at the same time.
Is it the same as saying how about we trade you Bradley for McLouth and Johnson. Would you do that trade?
Posted by: holycow | November 12, 2009 at 10:49 AM
Lowe's good. I don't think GMs think Lowe will repeat his bad season. With that given, I know they do not want to give 15 MM for an aging pitcher.
The upsides of Lowe are: 1. A ground ball pitcher.
2. A veteran pitcher.
3. A durable pitcher.
4. A winning pitcher.
He wont get hurt as much as Lackey and would seem to provide the same kind of wins. Lowe has had a few bad games, but will almost always get to the 7th or 8th inning. He would be a nice fit for the Yankees, as long as the Braves throw in a prospect and pay part of his salary.
Posted by: NL_East_Rivalry | November 12, 2009 at 10:49 AM
Prado is as good as Brandon Phillips for a fraction of the price.
Posted by: Land-Man | November 12, 2009 at 11:10 AM
Holy Cow I see you're point, but without much research I think DLee and Derek Lowe match up on the money, and I know the Cubs are wanting to play Fox at first. Also I know the Cubs are not wanting to give the raise to Fotenot so just a thought that they could use Kelly Johnson. Past big Z the Cubs pitching staff was not very good last year... Maybe they could use Lowe.
Second note LOL @ Land-man are you crazy Prado better than Brandon Phillips not a chance, pitchers fear B-Phillips. Pitchers pitch around guys like Chipper and Bmac to get to Prado.
Posted by: Rono840 | November 12, 2009 at 11:27 AM
Brandon Phillips has more power and speed than Prado.
Posted by: NL_East_Rivalry | November 12, 2009 at 11:27 AM
Rono, DLee would be traded for Javier if anything. They match up good there and they both will become FA's next year. Cubs don't want to use Fox, they want to trade him, because he is out of options. Cubs have been looking for a 2B player, but they would want Kelly unless Kelly proves himself.
Posted by: NL_East_Rivalry | November 12, 2009 at 11:30 AM
"You're delusional if you think Lowe and his 45mil contract can get Swisher."
I think it's a great move for the NYY. And that has nothing to do with the fact that I'm a RS fan.
Really, why bother signing a FA with an AL sub-4 ERA like Lackey for $15M, when all you need to do is to give up your starting RF in exchange for a $15M NL pitcher with the 4.67 ERA and the 1.52 Whip.
I mean, I don't think anyone hates the NYY as much as I do, but the NYY probably wouldn't trade a B prospect for him even if Atl picked up $10M per year of his contract. His last two years in the AL, he combined for an ERA of about 5.00 and a Whip of about 1.50, and that was 5 years ago.
Posted by: Joey B | November 12, 2009 at 11:44 AM
"4. A winning pitcher.
He wont get hurt as much as Lackey and would seem to provide the same kind of wins. Lowe has had a few bad games, but will almost always get to the 7th or 8th inning."
I'll give you the durable part, since he is ery rarely hurt, but his record over the past 6 years is 83-70, an average of ~ 14-12, not overly impressive since he's been on fairly good teams for the most part.
And his IP/GS was only 5.73, hardly the stuff of someone that usually gets into the 7th/8th inning. In 34 starts last year, he had 11 7th inning innings and only 2.1 8th inning innings. For comparison purposes, Dice K, whose inability to go deep into games is legendary, had 5.78 IPs/GS, 10 IPs in the 7th, and 3 in the 8th in his last full season.
Posted by: Joey B | November 12, 2009 at 11:59 AM
lowe going to the yanks seems like it would make sense, and not just from the braves point of view. the yanks could use him as a steady back of the rotation guy that'll eat innings and keep the ball on the ground in that new park of theirs. the ability to have a bullpen of joba, hughes, gaudin, rivera, etc would probably be pretty enticing to cashman. it seems that'd give them a good mix of reliability, youth, and experience with their pitching staff as a whole. no one's going to complain about having pitching depth. seems feasible.
the braves could really use the money from freeing up lowe, so there's that. if it was just dlowe for melky or gardner straight up i'd really have to think about taking it. think about the damage the braves could do if they had $15 million dollars all of a sudden! a lot of other teams are having money concerns, so maybe the braves could use that money to take advantage of the market and swing a few deals.
Posted by: blurba | November 12, 2009 at 12:56 PM
"lowe going to the yanks seems like it would make sense, and not just from the braves point of view. the yanks could use him as a steady back of the rotation guy that'll eat innings and keep the ball on the ground in that new park of theirs."
If you had a choice of Lackey for $15M at the back end of your rotation, or Lowe for $15M, which would you choose?
Posted by: Joey B | November 12, 2009 at 01:14 PM
"If you had a choice of Lackey for $15M at the back end of your rotation, or Lowe for $15M, which would you choose?"
Well if the money were even then you would have to consider that Lackey put up his numbers in the AL while Lowe put up his numbers in the NL which give an advantage to Lackey. Lowe is known to be the more durable pitcher which which as a backend starter would be great because it keeps joba in the pen where he is most valuable. Overall, the edge would probably still go to Lackey because of age difference.
But thats if the moneys even. Lackey is the best starter available and there will be competition while Lowe is set at 15M and could come cheaper if the braves cover some salary. I think the Yankees should explore the price tag and length of contract for Lackey and if it come to a point where Lowe seems like a better idea, then you have a fallback plan. Lowe will likely still be there because that what the braves will be waiting for. They will wait to see what happens with Lackey to get some attention from the clubs who missed out on this years premier free agent pitcher.
Posted by: zephyr8 | November 12, 2009 at 01:55 PM
Lowe has the 7th highest average salary in CONTRACT. No team is trading for Lowe unless it it a dollar for dollar exchange in contracts.
Derek Lee for Lowe?? Really?? You actually spent the time to write that?? Lowe and $11mil to the Cubs for Bradley and Fontenot.
Lowe is in the Pineiro, Garland, Marquis group. (no offense to those 3 pitchers. )
Posted by: Lilkenny | November 12, 2009 at 01:58 PM
By the way, I like the deal for Hudson. No matter which pitcher the braves deal they will still have Hudson, Jurrjens, and Hanson plus two of Lowe, Kawakami, and Vasquez.
Posted by: zephyr8 | November 12, 2009 at 02:00 PM
Read Onley's column. ( Not that he knows all ) Teams A dollars last offseason. Yanks will re-sign their own for one year.
Next offseason Lee, Halladay, Mauer, Beckett are scheduled to be FAs. that is where the Yankees shop. Not in the Lowe for $15 mil a yeaar aisle...
Posted by: Lilkenny | November 12, 2009 at 02:06 PM
If they could get anyone as good as swisher for lowe... do it.
Posted by: Braves-NL-Champs-2010 | November 12, 2009 at 02:07 PM
It seems that Lowe will have two teams that would be primed to get a top end of the rotation starter. Yankees or the Angles, depending who loses out on signing Lackey the other would be very interesting in trading for lowe. Angels could have a Sandoval and Arredondo to offer and Yanks could offer Melky/Gardner/Swisher. This will depend on how much Cash the braves send in return to get any player of significant. Once Lackey is signed the Lowe talk will intensify and be interesting on how FW will try to get top value with a FA market very thin for top of the rotation type SP available. Lowe should bounce back but going to the AL may actually hurt some value but we will have to wait and see....
Posted by: BravoFan3736 | November 12, 2009 at 02:09 PM
** Should be:
Teams don't have dollars to spend. Braves and Yankees spent about 1/2 of the FA dollars last off season.
Posted by: Lilkenny | November 12, 2009 at 02:09 PM
How ironic would it be if Lowe were traded for GMJ. Didn't we release GMJ in spring training a few years ago? I know I sound like a broken record, but let me say it again.
Formula for success: Trade Lowe and his big ass contract.
Sign Billy Wagner
Get a RH power bat
Posted by: FLaBravesFan | November 12, 2009 at 02:10 PM
all i was saying was that i could see a scenario coming up where lowe ends up going to the yankees. sure, they may or may not sign lackey instead. all i said was that it was feasible.
Posted by: blurba | November 12, 2009 at 02:12 PM
Second note LOL @ Land-man are you crazy Prado better than Brandon Phillips not a chance, pitchers fear B-Phillips. Pitchers pitch around guys like Chipper and Bmac to get to Prado.
Posted by: Rono840 | November 12, 2009 at 11:27 AM
You can keep Phillips and his lifetime OPS of .742, and we'll keep Prado with his lifetime OPS of .810, thanks. Prado is a better hitter every day of the week.
Posted by: FineHamAbounds | November 12, 2009 at 02:13 PM
@rono
It's really not hard to do the research.
Derrek Lee had a huge 2009 and is owed $13 million in 2010 before becoming a free agent.
Derek Lowe had a down 2009 and is owed $45 million through 2012.
Hardly a "match" on the money side.
"Past big Z the Cubs pitching staff was not very good last year... Maybe they could use Lowe."
If Randy Wells (3.05 ERA) and Ted Lilly (3.10 ERA) weren't good enough, perhaps the Cubs should dump them. Ryan Dempster wasn't bad either (3.65 ERA, 172 strikeouts). Odd comment.
Posted by: vtadave | November 12, 2009 at 02:20 PM
Brandon Phillips is allergic to getting on base and his home and road splits are terrible..if he pitched in a non hitters park he wouldn't even be talked about at all
Posted by: ConverseChris | November 12, 2009 at 02:22 PM
Compare Prado to Phillips after he has 2000 more ABs. Phillips is a plus defender. Prado not so much...
Posted by: Lilkenny | November 12, 2009 at 02:24 PM
Brandon Phillips is allergic to getting on base and his home and road splits are terrible..if he pitched in a non hitters park he wouldn't even be talked about at all
Posted by: ConverseChris | November 12, 2009 at 02:22 PM"
Hey! You sound like me! Phillips is vastly overrated.
Posted by: 661dodgerblue | November 12, 2009 at 02:27 PM
"Then Braves trade Fotenot Kris Medlen, and Jordan Schefer ( yes he had his chance plus he is not going to be a big time MLB talent player an Average at best) to the reds for Brandon Phillips."
dude you have no clue how really really good schafer can be. he had a wrist injury at the beginning of last season that made him struggle and swing at strikes only. he never chased a bad ball from what i saw from him which was every game he played.
hes the exact mold of grady sizemore. and i mean a clone copy and is bound for success. you must be crazy if you think wren would give up on schafer.
Posted by: tntnhhs | November 12, 2009 at 02:31 PM
Wow Braves fans. And everyone says Yankee fans are delusional. Lowe is worth nothing. Not even close to getting you Swisher. Yeah, let's bring an elderly pitcher who is owed a ton of money and couldn't get it done in the only division in the NL where there is anything resembling an offense and, not only that, let's give up our starting right fielder who is on a good contract, has great OBP, and power. Braves fans, please wake up for a moment and realize that any sportswriter who wants people to click on his link will say the Yankees might get involved on a certain player. There is no substance to it in fantasy or reality.
Posted by: TonyYanksFan | November 12, 2009 at 02:34 PM
Brandon Phillips is allergic to getting on base and his home and road splits are terrible..if he pitched in a non hitters park he wouldn't even be talked about at all
Posted by: ConverseChris | November 12, 2009 at 02:22 PM"
Hey! You sound like me! Phillips is vastly overrated.
Posted by: 661dodgerblue | November 12, 2009 at 02:27 PM
Haha yeah I usually read the comments and you usually are on point with what you say but yeah Brandon Phillips is alright but he is very overrated because of his power.
Posted by: ConverseChris | November 12, 2009 at 02:34 PM
Wow Braves fans. And everyone says Yankee fans are delusional. Lowe is worth nothing. Not even close to getting you Swisher. Yeah, let's bring an elderly pitcher who is owed a ton of money and couldn't get it done in the only division in the NL where there is anything resembling an offense and, not only that, let's give up our starting right fielder who is on a good contract, has great OBP, and power. Braves fans, please wake up for a moment and realize that any sportswriter who wants people to click on his link will say the Yankees might get involved on a certain player. There is no substance to it in fantasy or reality.
Posted by: TonyYanksFan | November 12, 2009 at 02:34 PM
Well I am a Braves fan, and I for one agree with you..with lowe's ridiculous contract now and swishers great year we would be lucky to get anything with lowe..it will pretty much be a salary dump and I am all for that I just want to address the RH power bat. Personally I want Josh Willingham or Carlos Lee but that may be just me
Posted by: ConverseChris | November 12, 2009 at 02:39 PM
"By the way, I like the deal for Hudson. No matter which pitcher the braves deal they will still have Hudson, Jurrjens, and Hanson plus two of Lowe, Kawakami, and Vasquez."
It's a nice deal for Atl. But for those that think Lowe can be traded, Hudson signed for ~9M, and he's a better pitcher than Lowe at $15M, though more of an injury risk.
Posted by: Joey B | November 12, 2009 at 02:40 PM
Phillips is not overrated. Prado couldn't hit 20 homeruns in batting practice let alone 162 game season.
Prado was a bench player for a reason. Don't get me wrong he had a solid year last year, and I rooted for him, but he is not an everyday MLB player. Plus with Phillips, its just like ever other athlete you lose your desire when you play for a losing team every year.
Maybe I was reaching a bit on the Lowe comment to the Cubs, but there will be a deal done involving Lowe. IMO Javy will stay put, and maybe even sign an extension.
I am just trying to think half way realistically the Braves are not getting Holiday or Bay.
The Braves need hitters. Still kills me to this day, we picked Garret Anderson over Adam Dunn, and Bobby Abreau.
One guy with 30 or 40 homerun power the braves are very close to the Phillies level.
Posted by: Rono840 | November 12, 2009 at 02:47 PM
Note to Braves fans: You don't get prospects back in a salary dump.
I repeat, you DON'T get prospects back in a salary dump.
Posted by: TwinRoyals | November 12, 2009 at 02:53 PM
Note to Braves fans: You don't get prospects back in a salary dump.
I repeat, you DON'T get prospects back in a salary dump.
Posted by: TwinRoyals | November 12, 2009 at 02:53 PM
I know that, only the ones that propose absurd trades and overrate our prospects do that. The real ones get overlooked for the blind homer ones :(
Posted by: ConverseChris | November 12, 2009 at 02:59 PM
"Note to Braves fans: You don't get prospects back in a salary dump.
I repeat, you DON'T get prospects back in a salary dump."
You get nothing of value in a salary dump essentially you are giving them away in that scenario much like the Blue Jays did with Alex Rios. He was claimed by the White Sox and they were like "congratulations he's all your's" and got nothing back not even a player or any money.
Posted by: ericbrat20 | November 12, 2009 at 02:59 PM
two comments from the same poster in the same thread...
"Next step would be either get Garret Anderson back or try and gamble on Nady"
"Still kills me to this day, we picked Garret Anderson over Adam Dunn, and Bobby Abreau."
so what are your thoughts on Anderson?
Posted by: csg | November 12, 2009 at 03:04 PM
The Yankees are a bad fit. They don't have a horrible contract to trade back. Do the Braves send the Yankees ~$21 mil to take Lowe for Brian Bruney???
Posted by: Lilkenny | November 12, 2009 at 03:13 PM
I don't see the Yanks trading Swisher for Lowe. I don't even expect them to go after him @ all.
Posted by: Yankeeboy11 | November 12, 2009 at 03:14 PM
two comments from the same poster in the same thread...
"Next step would be either get Garret Anderson back or try and gamble on Nady"
"Still kills me to this day, we picked Garret Anderson over Adam Dunn, and Bobby Abreau."
so what are your thoughts on Anderson?
Posted by: csg | November 12, 2009 at 03:04 PM
Anderson isnt horrible but Dunn and Abreau are way better than he is. Point of that post was saying if some way the Braves got DLee and Brandon Phillips it would not be necessary to try and get Bay or Holiday. Meaning you could get the way lesser Garret Anderson, or take a gamble on Nady.
Posted by: Rono840 | November 12, 2009 at 03:15 PM
GA played better than Frenchy last year
Posted by: Rono840 | November 12, 2009 at 03:16 PM
I would like to see the Braves go after Nady. However with Boras as his agent, Nady might not be all that cheap even with the missed time due to injury.
I love that Huddy signed such an affordable extension.
As for Lowe, I think he is movable but probably not for much in return (or the Braves would have to eat an inflated contract of a hitter).
Posted by: ABravesFan | November 12, 2009 at 03:22 PM
Phillips vs Prado doesn't matter. It won't happen but saying Phillips can't hit away from Cincy is stupid, same amount of HR's home/away and way more RBI on road. Prado outslugged and had better OPS than Phillips last year. Phillips is a more dynamic player because of his speed and defense but Prado hits well enough and is not making much money.
Posted by: cheez13 | November 12, 2009 at 03:24 PM
I have been thinking about this for a while. I have not really looked up the specific numbers so if I am completely off, bear with me...but what about a Derek Lowe for Juan Pierre deal? I'm pretty sure both still have multiple years of contract left; plus I think Pierre's is actually pretty expensive too which would be good to counter Lowe's 15 mil/yr. Lowe has been a dodger before, and I'm pretty sure they could still use a pitcher especially if Wolf leaves. The dodgers' OF will still be crowded (assuming they hold onto Kemp and Ethier). Maybe the Braves have to throw in a prospect to equate value.
On the Braves' end, they would get a true leadoff hitter, be able to put Mclouth at the 2 spot or somewhere else, and a LF (presumably you stick Pierre with the worse arm in left). True, they won't get a right handed power hitter, but they could still keep LaRoche and have a pretty darn good line up..thoughts?
Posted by: yucavich | November 12, 2009 at 03:29 PM
Here is one Yankee fans might like. I'll look at it completely from their angle.
Trade:
Derek Lowe, Nate McLouth, and legit pitching prospect (outside of Teheran or Delgado) ie Rohrbough or Spruil.
for
Nick Swisher
This would be be an opportunity for the Yanks to get a innings eater MOR starter, a gigantic upgrade to LF defense with LH pop that should play well in Yankee stadium, and a high upside SP prospect.
Aquiring McLouth would allow the Yanks to be flexible in signing either Matsui or Damon as a DH while making a the no-brainer signing (IHMO) of Cameron.
1. Jeter SS
2. McLouth/Damon LF/DH
3. A-Rod 3B
4. Teixeira 1B
5. McLouth/Matsui LF/DH
6. Posada C
7. Cameron CF
8. Cano 2B
9. Cabrera/Gardner RF
That outfield defense would be 100x better and that lineup still has major thunder.
Then you have two aces at the top, two veteran anchors in the middle and some young guns fighting for the last spot and providing needed depth.
Sabathia
Burnett
Petitte
Lowe
Joba/Hughes
(For those wondering, Nady would take over in LF or 1B depending on who else is brought in and Schafer/Heyward/Diaz would play CF/CF-RF/RF)
Posted by: bbxxj | November 12, 2009 at 03:31 PM
Frenchy didn't play well in ATL but look at their numbers at the end of last season. GA had worst OBP of all Braves regulars and played below avg defense.
GA isn't even an option this year. Nady, Dye or any other RH hitting OF will be a better option than GA.
Lowe for Swisher ain't happening. Lowe could go to Angels if they lose Lackey. But, the Braves would only get a mid-level prospect or two. Its more about the salary. Oviously, trading Lowe and extending Vasquez for below market value is ideal. JJ, Hanson, Hudson, Vasquez, KK for the next 2-3 years sounds great.
If they dumped Lowes salary then Jason Bay is a possiblity, Holliday isn't (can you say Boras?)..but dumping Lowe and signing Bay is a long shot to say the least.
Posted by: cheez13 | November 12, 2009 at 03:32 PM
Yucavich,
Lowe didn't want to come back to LA, if he did I don't see why they wouldn't of signed him.
Posted by: 661dodgerblue | November 12, 2009 at 03:33 PM
Dodgerblue, good to know...does he have a no trade clause though?
And I can tell you why they would not have signed him last year, one word: MANNY.
He took all the money from last year.
Posted by: yucavich | November 12, 2009 at 03:37 PM
Or at least all of the $ it would have taken to resign Lowe
Posted by: yucavich | November 12, 2009 at 03:38 PM
Pierre is signed through 2011 and is being paid 9 mil so the numbers don't exactly work out, but we could make it work.
Posted by: yucavich | November 12, 2009 at 03:40 PM
If the Braves trade him, he has no choice. He doesn't have a no trade clause. It doesn't really matter if he wants to go to LA or not.
I checked GA's stats....terrible. Francoeur had a higher OBP if you can believe that. Frenchy's numbers were better across the board, plays better defense and of course the big arm. Too bad it didn't work out for Frenchy, still a fan but I know why they traded him. He played alot better once he went to NY.
Posted by: cheez13 | November 12, 2009 at 03:42 PM
Yeah I'm happy for Jeff, just wish he could have righted the ship at home.
Good to hear Lowe does not have a NTC. I'm starting the official Lowe (plus whatever else it takes) for Pierre campaign!
Posted by: yucavich | November 12, 2009 at 03:45 PM
Lowe for pierre campaign...ew braves need power not another slap hitter
Posted by: ConverseChris | November 12, 2009 at 03:53 PM
bbxxj
That would be a horrible deal just for Swisher.
Posted by: Jay212033 | November 12, 2009 at 03:54 PM
Yankees fans: Lackey will also cost your first round draft pick in addition to the money...if that means anything to you guys.
Posted by: BravesWorld | November 12, 2009 at 03:54 PM
ConverseChris...we scored ridiculous amounts of runs once LaRoche joined us. Just resign him, put Pierre up top, and mclouth further down in the order (he does have power you know; would definitely benefit moving further down the order)
Posted by: yucavich | November 12, 2009 at 03:57 PM
If the Braves really want to shed Lowe's contract, they might consider dealing with the DBacks for Eric Byrnes.
Byrnes is (for the most part) awful, but you're stuck with him for only one year. And he might actually be able to put together a couple of decent months before Heyward is promoted.
Besides, if the DBacks are thinking about pursuing Marquis, then Lowe isn't such a terrible alternative.
Posted by: ink-stained scribe | November 12, 2009 at 04:07 PM
yucavich,
Pierre is terrible. He can run. That's it. No power. Rarely gets on base. Can't throw, which largely negates his ability to cover ground in the OF.
I'd rather have Byrnes. And I don't like Byrnes.
Posted by: ink-stained scribe | November 12, 2009 at 04:08 PM
@ Jay
No it's really not. Swisher has 30+ HR power, takes a ton of walks and is versitile on defense. He had actually better power numbers away from homer happy Yankee stadium. That trade also clears ~14M off the books and so would allow additional moves like LaRoche and some big bulpen additions or added with some exta payroll space from KJ, GA, etc getting dropped, a major run at Holliday/Bay.
The only way we turn Lowe into Swisher would be to send some serious talent along. Since both Schafer and Heyward(short term) can man CF McLouth is expendable and our MLB and MiLB pitching talent is so deep we can afford to move a major SP prospect or two.
Posted by: bbxxj | November 12, 2009 at 04:10 PM
Pierre also isn't the sort of player Wren goes after. Wren actually pays attention to OBP, which is one reason he got rid of Frenchy.
Posted by: ink-stained scribe | November 12, 2009 at 04:10 PM
to yucavich's credit, we really didnt have a problem scoring runs in the second half...second in the nl, actually. and we'd be in a much better spot if we had mclouth in a spot where he could drive in runs. i'm not sure the pierre idea specifically has any legs, though.
one thing i will say, regardless of pierre, is that if we had a legit leadoff guy, we could put chipper at #2, then platooned diaz and mclouth in the #3 spot, i think we'd have a really consistent, really dangerous lineup. at this point in his career chipper is more of a table-setter and can't match the slg that the diaz/mclouth platoon at the #3 spot would produce. just look at their respective splits.
anyone that watched the team in the second half knows what they're capable of, and i firmly believe adding a true leadoff guy and a re-organization of the current lineup (that includes laroche) would be a lot more potent than people realize.
Posted by: blurba | November 12, 2009 at 04:15 PM
Thank you Blurba, completely agree with everything you said.
@Ink-Stained...you obviously missed the point of my campaign for Pierre, I know he can't hit for power, heck he has like 5 homeruns in his career. But did you see him play last year when manny was suspended? The guy performed like an MVP. A reshuffling of the lineup could do wonders next year.
Posted by: yucavich | November 12, 2009 at 04:25 PM
Lets not compare Pierre's career OBP of .348 to Frenchy's at .301 Pierre would be fine if the Braves had a true clean-up man like Pujos or Tex playing 1B...but they don't. So, the best option is LaRoche back at 1B and a RH hitter with some pop in LF (Dye, Nady, DeRosa are the best free agent options ouside of the Big 2).
Posted by: cheez13 | November 12, 2009 at 04:34 PM
"
Here is one Yankee fans might like. I'll look at it completely from their angle.
Trade:
Derek Lowe, Nate McLouth, and legit pitching prospect (outside of Teheran or Delgado) ie Rohrbough or Spruil.
for
Nick Swisher
This would be be an opportunity for the Yanks to get a innings eater MOR starter, a gigantic upgrade to LF defense with LH pop that should play well in Yankee stadium, and a high upside SP prospect.
Aquiring McLouth would allow the Yanks to be flexible in signing either Matsui or Damon as a DH while making a the no-brainer signing (IHMO) of Cameron.
1. Jeter SS
2. McLouth/Damon LF/DH
3. A-Rod 3B
4. Teixeira 1B
5. McLouth/Matsui LF/DH
6. Posada C
7. Cameron CF
8. Cano 2B
9. Cabrera/Gardner RF
That outfield defense would be 100x better and that lineup still has major thunder.
Then you have two aces at the top, two veteran anchors in the middle and some young guns fighting for the last spot and providing needed depth.
Sabathia
Burnett
Petitte
Lowe
Joba/Hughes
(For those wondering, Nady would take over in LF or 1B depending on who else is brought in and Schafer/Heyward/Diaz would play CF/CF-RF/RF)"
----------------------
No, no, no, and no some more.
We could easily just lose Lowe's contract without giving up one of the bigger players on the team. and why the hell would we throw in a top prospect as well? That is an awful idea. Period. Plus I don't want Nady either considering his health issues after TJ.
Posted by: Darion | November 12, 2009 at 04:37 PM
If the Dodgers didn't/couldn't sign Lowe because of Maany why would they be able to take on his contracr now?? they still have Manny.
What teams, beside the Braves and Mets, had interest in Lowe last off season??? Those are the only 2 I remeber.
Lackey for a 1st rd pick is a steal. Its pick #30. No real loss to the Yankees. They'll pick someone in the 5th rd that dropped due to salary deamands and pay him 1st rd money...
Posted by: Lilkenny | November 12, 2009 at 04:40 PM
Thats ridiculious. The Braves got McLouth on the cheap. I think he is only due around 4 million this year. Why does everyone think Swisher is the answer? He is a solid guy who can hit some HR's but lets not go crazy. McLouth is cheaper, younger, faster. Swisher has a more pop, McLouth is a better defender. You want to leave CF to Matt Diaz or two rookies?? R U serious. Heyward is a corner OF won't be up until June.
I agree with above poster...why would Braves throw in a prospect? That trade is not even plausible.
Posted by: cheez13 | November 12, 2009 at 04:47 PM
I don't know, I'm half/half on Lackey. Good pitcher, doesn't resemble a #1 to me, but wouldn't be with CC here in NY. I just don't think he's worth what he'll want, and I want them to go after Hernandez or Halladay next off-season.
Posted by: O'Neill Fan | November 12, 2009 at 05:23 PM
bbxxj
I usually agree with most of the things you have to say but trading Lowe, McLouth and a good mL pitcher for just Swisher would be grossly overpaying. I know we all want to get rid of Lowe's contract but you add another hole by trading McLouth, I really like Schafer and all but who's to say he comes back and plays well? Remember when we had Schafer and Frenchy in the OF for most of the 1st half we finished below .500 just think if we would have had McLouth and Diaz/Church from the jump.
If we were to trade McLouth it would have to be for a more consistent power bat. I think that the Braves could package McLouth, Medlen, Freeman, Rohrbough and Kimbrel to the Padres and get Adrian Gonzalez. Then sign Mike Cameron and we still trade Lowe to the DBacks for Coner Jackson and a prospect.
Posted by: Jay212033 | November 12, 2009 at 05:26 PM
Thats ridiculious. The Braves got McLouth on the cheap. I think he is only due around 4 million this year. Why does everyone think Swisher is the answer? He is a solid guy who can hit some HR's but lets not go crazy. McLouth is cheaper, younger, faster. Swisher has a more pop, McLouth is a better defender. You want to leave CF to Matt Diaz or two rookies?? R U serious. Heyward is a corner OF won't be up until June.
I agree with above poster...why would Braves throw in a prospect? That trade is not even plausible.
Posted by: cheez13 | November 12, 2009 at 04:47 PM
Lowe's IS A BAD CONTRACT. It's the 7th largest per season average for a pitcher. To think you could get a player like Swisher back for him is a fairy tale.
The Yanks would be interested in a Lowe and $24 mil for Brian Bruney type trade...
Posted by: Lilkenny | November 12, 2009 at 05:27 PM