![]() |
|
|
| |
« Dodgers Javier Vazquez Rumor Shot Down | Main | Dan Uggla Hopes To Remain At Second Base »
Between trades and free agents there are easily more than 50 starting pitchers available. The Brewers, looking to add two starters, figure to be linked to many.
One new name to pop up today is Detroit's Edwin Jackson; Tom Haudricourt of the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel says that Brewers GM Doug Melvin has spoken to the Tigers about him. Atlanta could also match up with the Brewers, as MLB.com's Mark Bowman sees a possible match with Javier Vazquez and, to a lesser extent, Derek Lowe.
By my calculations, the Brewers should have more than $15MM to spend if they non-tender Dave Bush, Jody Gerut, and Seth McClung. Who would you like to see them pursue?
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
As a Braves fan, I would love to see the Brewers pursue Derek Lowe. And then I'd like to see the Braves use that money to extend Vazquez for three years.
Posted by: parrothead8 | November 13, 2009 at 01:45 PM
They won't non-tender Jody Gerut. They only have 4 OF on their roster now including Gerut and no minor leaguer OF all that close.
Gerut played pretty well down the stretch last year and figures to be cheap enough to keep as 4th outfielder.
Bush's fate will depend on what they can do between now and the tender date. If they add 2 or more solid experienced starters, he's gone. If they only add one veteran, and a prospect or two, he'll likely stay. Of course that's assuming he isn't part of a deal which is also quite likely.
McClung?? They won't think twice before non-tendering him.
Posted by: DaveinEG | November 13, 2009 at 01:51 PM
As a Brewers fan, I'd live to see the Brewers trade for Edwin Jackson. I would also love to see them non-tender McClung and Gerut. Both guys are bums.
Posted by: lion in a coma | November 13, 2009 at 01:52 PM
What chips do the Brewers have to pull off a trade for Jackson, Vazquez, or Lowe?
Posted by: WestCoastBias | November 13, 2009 at 01:54 PM
Brewers can trade Mat Gamel and other prospects possibly for Jackson, or either Braves SP.
Posted by: lion in a coma | November 13, 2009 at 01:55 PM
Oh, I thought he was slotted as their 3B next year... Interesting that he's available, definitely a solid chip.
Posted by: WestCoastBias | November 13, 2009 at 01:58 PM
Please don't trade Gamel to anyone but the Blue Jays. There is a reason that the Tigers want to deal Jackson, I think most people call it "Selling High"
Posted by: Peter D | November 13, 2009 at 02:00 PM
Brewers can have Lowe for nothing....
Posted by: Darion | November 13, 2009 at 02:00 PM
Jackson would definitely fit in well to the Brewers rotation... Especially 'cause I have a feeling the Braves will wait out the Angels usual non-moves until they decide they'll take on Lowe, which is definitely the best option of their 6 SP's to trade... if the team is picking up the salary.
Posted by: WestCoastBias | November 13, 2009 at 02:01 PM
He was slotted as their 3b next year before the emergence of McGehee. Now they seem to have the thought that his D is a little weak for 3b and his bat is a little weak for 1b. He could be tried out in a corner outfield spot though, especially if Corey Hart is used in a trade with the Braves or someone else.
Posted by: vacin8r | November 13, 2009 at 02:01 PM
or a small time player. A top prospect is not needed. Vazquez on the other hand is another story....
Posted by: Darion | November 13, 2009 at 02:01 PM
The crew want to go with McGee at 3rd. I don't see the crew having interest in Lowe. I doubt they non-tender Bush or Gerut. Bush when healthy is a solid inng eater.
Posted by: AndyVanSlyke | November 13, 2009 at 02:02 PM
I think that the Tigers should really take this opportunity to sell high on Jackson, because his apparent improvement isn't nearly as substantial as some have been led to believe.
If the Tigers can market Jackson as a TOR starter, then dealing him could be a really astute move by Dombrowski and company.
I go into more detail on this on my new blog, Scribbling the Majors, among other things. I can't link to it here out of respect for Tim and MLBTR, but I've been discussing numerous hot stove topics on it. It's a Blogger blog, by the way. And I hope that this mention is alright by Tim, I'm certainly not trying to spam anyone on this site or anything.
Posted by: scribbletone | November 13, 2009 at 02:02 PM
Personally, I'd like to see the Brewers put together a strong offer for Halladay... Gamel, Brett Lawrie, Manny Parra, Jon Lucroy, and Jake Odorizzi?
Posted by: WestCoastBias | November 13, 2009 at 02:04 PM
Brewers don't want Lowe unless Braves take back Suppan in return.
Posted by: DaveinEG | November 13, 2009 at 02:04 PM
I don't see Brewers getting involved with Toronto.
Brewers have TOR starter in Gallardo, so they don't see Jackson as more than a 2. They won't deal as if he's a one no matter how much Dombrowski "markets" him.
Posted by: DaveinEG | November 13, 2009 at 02:08 PM
"Personally, I'd like to see the Brewers put together a strong offer for Halladay... Gamel, Brett Lawrie, Manny Parra, Jon Lucroy, and Jake Odorizzi?"
Giving up those guys for one year of Halladay wouldn't seem to be the best use of resources in my opinion, considering that Doc is likely to test the FA market after next season.
The Brewers shouldn't mortgage their future just to try to contend while Fielder is around. The core of Braun, Gallardo, and Escobar is still good, and they're still capable of building a contender without dealing for Halladay.
Posted by: scribbletone | November 13, 2009 at 02:16 PM
thats laughable that anyone thinks the brewers would take Lowe unless the braves chipped in on half his deal
Posted by: TheCrewOfBrew | November 13, 2009 at 02:17 PM
CC Sabathia
Posted by: Chorizo5 | November 13, 2009 at 02:19 PM
"Personally, I'd like to see the Brewers put together a strong offer for Halladay... Gamel, Brett Lawrie, Manny Parra, Jon Lucroy, and Jake Odorizzi?"
I think that deal would decimate the Brewers for years to come.
Essentially, that means they would have given up every solid prospect in their system for one-half season of CC Sabathia and one season of Roy Halladay, with nothing to show for it after Halladay becomes a free agent.
Posted by: parrothead8 | November 13, 2009 at 02:21 PM
yeah im glad the brewers haven't been mentioned for halladay. they can trade gamel and some trash for edwin jackson and then sign lackey.
Lackey
Gallardo
Jackson
Parra
Bush/Suppan/Mulder?
Could be a nasty rotation. It would definitely be competitive in their division.
Posted by: TheCrewOfBrew | November 13, 2009 at 02:23 PM
Brewers don't want Lowe unless Braves take back Suppan in return.
Posted by: DaveinEG | November 13, 2009 at 02:04 PM
You know, as a Braves fan I might jump at that. It would clear 2.5M off the books this year and allow the finacial flexibility to give Vazquez a nice 3 year extention from '11-'13.
From the Brewers point of view they would be getting a very quality starter for 2.5/13/15 over the next three years. Aquiring him this way would still allow them to use Gamel and others to go after a pitcher like Jackson and 10+M in salary room to add another nice FA starter.
Posted by: bbxxj | November 13, 2009 at 02:26 PM
bbxxj-
That would not be a good deal for the brewers at all. Suppan is off the books after this year. The last thing they need is another over paid pitcher on their roster for another couple years. The brewers make that trade and there is no way they have the money for Prince.
Posted by: TheCrewOfBrew | November 13, 2009 at 02:29 PM
What about an Ian Kennedy for Matt Gamel trade?
Posted by: dan l | November 13, 2009 at 02:30 PM
Jackson would likely do well in the NL Central, at least the expected drop off wouldn't be as pronounced as it's possibly going to be if he stays in the AL. I don't know if I'd trade Gamel straight up for him but the Crew seemed to have put themselves in a good position to acquire pitching with some of their recent moves. If they do things right this winter they could be more than just a marginal contender next year.
Posted by: pageian | November 13, 2009 at 02:38 PM
The Brewers could trade Corey hart, but in no way shape or form are they going to think about trading Lucroy in this decade, they're depleted at catcher right now and giving up a future stud for a year of any1, i dont care who it is would be a bad move.
Dave Bush is also really good from the bullpen and as a spot starter, the Brewers are not going to non-tender him.
Posted by: brewsers | November 13, 2009 at 02:44 PM
No Brainer
Bucholtz, Bard, Bowden and Lowie for Fielder.
Parra and Gamel for Curtis G. and Jackson.
Posted by: rockford | November 13, 2009 at 02:57 PM
Scribble - I'm trying to get back to your blog, didn't save it the first time I went there, but I can't seem to locate it. It doesn't come up by doing a search on blogger, google either. Can you point me in the right direction without giving the url? If not I'll give you a email addy to send it to. I'd appreciate it. I hope it's okay for me to ask Tim, if not please delete. Thanks!
Posted by: pageian | November 13, 2009 at 03:02 PM
rockford,
I'm pretty sure if DD were to package Curt and Ejack in a blockbuster deal, he'd be able to get a bit more value than Gamel and Parra. Atleast I would hope so.
Posted by: tigers22 | November 13, 2009 at 03:04 PM
Clearly, rockford, only a person with no brain would suggest those deals.
WE ARE NOT TRADING FIELDER. GET OVER IT.
We don't need Curtis Granderson. However, a Gamel for Jackson swap would be good, but I know the Tigers won't do that deal. It would probably require some other prospects on our part.
That said, I think that acquiring Edwin Jackson would be a very good move on the Brewers part. He is a very good pitcher who would EASILY be our #2 pitcher. Then, if we could sign John Lackey, we would have a nasty rotation for next year.
Given, this could just be a pipe dream, but don't deny that it's possible. Jackson is still relatively cheap ($2.2 million last season) and we are freeing up quite a bit of money with trades and non-tenders and declining options.
Posted by: Sage | November 13, 2009 at 03:10 PM
Being a Tigers fan, I have mixed emotions about them dealing Jackson. The guys a solid starter, but if the Tigers feel they can improve by adding young players they should move him.
Sage, I agree with you. I think they could work out a Jackson for Gamel + other prospect(s) deal.
Posted by: tigers22 | November 13, 2009 at 03:14 PM
haha yea the brewers wouldnt trade lawrie. I think that they go with lowe or jackson. And i agree with tigers22, gamel plus maybe an outfield prospect.
Posted by: Mase37 | November 13, 2009 at 03:17 PM
Mase37, outfield prospect? Uh-oh, we can't do that. We have pretty much no minor league outfield that is anywhere near the Majors, other than Lorenzo Cain.
How about Corey Hart for Edwin Jackson straight up? I'm probably undervaluing Jackson there, but, I'm just giving an idea.
If we do that, it helps us in a couple ways. We shed Hart's salary ($3.25 million last season), and, we get to add another lefty to our lineup in Gamel, who would play right field.
Hart for Jackson. Thoughts, Tigers fans?
Posted by: Sage | November 13, 2009 at 03:33 PM
As a Braves fan, I'd like to see the Braves trade Lowe away, heck, if you have to pay a portion of his salary, then so be it, he's not worth another three years.
Vazquez was one of the best pitchers in the league this past year. Sure, he's in the last year of his contract, but if you keep Vazquez, then you essentially have 4 #1 starters next year.
Posted by: www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=39807698 | November 13, 2009 at 03:43 PM
As a big Brewers fan I would love it if they got Vazquez and I think Gamel and Parra may get that deal done.
If the the tigers would seriously do Hart for Edwin Jackson I am all over that one also.
Then bring in Doug Davis and a out fielder through free agency
Your Rotation is
Vazquez
Gallardo
Jackson
D. Davis
Bush
Line up
SS Escobar
2B Weeks
LF Braun
1B Fielder
3B McGehee
RF
C Lucroy
PITCHER
CF Gomez
Posted by: domsberg | November 13, 2009 at 03:48 PM
"considering that Doc is likely to test the FA market after next season"
everything i've read is that the only way Halladay doesn't exercise his no trade clause is if he gets a long term deal from the trading team...so what makes you think he's going to test FA? he'd obviously be the cream of the crop after 2010 season but there are a lot of pitchers coming due that year and he's been relatively healthy...what is he going to prove in 2010 that he hasn't proven already that will get him paid more in FA after 2010
in fact it makes much more sense to be traded to a team so that the trading team is more or less handcuffed into offering a long term deal to Hallady or risk having the whole "1 year rental" PR nightmare of trading a ton of prospects and having him bolt
Posted by: dboy79 | November 13, 2009 at 03:58 PM
Pageian- It's a Blogger blog, and the URL is just the name of the blog, obviously.
Posted by: scribbletone | November 13, 2009 at 04:03 PM
As a Tigers fan, I don't think I'd be okay with Jackson for Hart straight up. I personally think Jackson has more value, and if they do deal him I'd like to see multiple needs addressed.
Posted by: tigers22 | November 13, 2009 at 04:06 PM
It's also on Baseball Bloggers Alliance, too. Okay, I'm done with that now.
"As a Tigers fan, I don't think I'd be okay with Jackson for Hart straight up. I personally think Jackson has more value, and if they do deal him I'd like to see multiple needs addressed"
Yeah.. Jackson isn't nearly as valuable as Hart, given Hart's struggles the past two seasons, and Jackson's breakout.
You're talking about trading a guy who hasn't posted a WAR above 0.9 since 2007 for a guy who posted a 3.5 WAR in 2009 alone.
I think that something like Jackson for Gamel, Lucroy or Salome, and Frederickson could be a decent offer.
Not sure if Salome would particularly appeal to Detroit though, he's not terribly different from Alex Avila.
Posted by: scribbletone | November 13, 2009 at 04:13 PM
Jackson for Hart, I don't think so. Hart is worst and Detroit wouldn't be gaining much with salary relief (the reason for the deal).
I say Gamel and a mid level pitching prospect for Jackson and Inge or Jackson and 1 of Willis/Robertson/Bonderman - who stink now, but in the NL could be a decent 3-4-5 pitcher...
Posted by: Furtah | November 13, 2009 at 04:35 PM
"What about an Ian Kennedy for Matt Gamel trade?"
-dan l
not going to happen. Kennedy's stock is at an all time low. The return the Yankees could get on Kennedy right now would be someone like a Washburn or Looper type of a pitcher. Kennedy for Gamel is extremely laughable.
Hughes would cost just a little bit more than Gamel straight up but that is what you would be looking at trading for someone like Gamel. Not someone like Kennedy who projects to be a #3 at best but will probably be a #4 or a #5 pitcher.
I'm not even sure Kennedy is healthy.
I wonder if the Brewers could swap Gomez, Gamel, Odorizzi, and Salome/Lucroy for Granderson, Jackson, and a C grade prospect.
Posted by: Nate crew | November 13, 2009 at 11:53 PM
Some of you need to be realistic... Vasquez is not THAT good. He cannot be considered a #1 since time and time again he has shown that he tends to wilt under pressure. Plus, look his career: Doesn't his record show that he can't pitch the big games? He has the stuff but apparently he can't use it consistently from one season to the next. Don't count your chickens. He may end up going back to his norm: 4.00+ ERA. Man, he's only 3 games above .500 for his entire career!
The Braves should try to trade him because it's all about what is in the club's best interest. JJ & Hanson will eventually take over the #1 and #2 spots, possibly even next year--these two have incredible poise!--so what does that leave? Hudson for #3, Lowe for #4 (which isn't bad at all is it??), and Kawakami for #5. That's one heck of a staff!
If we could get back something significant for Vasquez in LF, why not do it??
If you are thinking Lowe vs. Vasquez, they both won 15 games. Who cares what the ERA is, if they both had the same record. Then what is the point? Is it "how you do it", not "what you do"??? Even Nolan Ryan had electric stuff but he barely kept his head above water with his won-loss record!
Some guys just have it in them to win win win despite not having overwhelming stuff. Look at Tom Glavine...
Posted by: proeye | November 14, 2009 at 08:28 AM
Anyone think the Tigers could get Escobar from the Brewers for Jackson?
Posted by: pistonsfan133 | November 14, 2009 at 10:32 AM
pistonsfan133, NO. We already traded J.J. Hardy for Carlos Gomez to make room for Escobar to be our starting shortstop. If we traded him away, we'd be stuck with literally NOTHING at the shortstop position for next season. Not to mention, I think Alcides Escobar has more value than Edwin Jackson.
There are several players the Brewers will not trade. They are Prince Fielder, Ryan Braun, Yovani Gallardo, and Alcides Escobar.
Posted by: Sage | November 14, 2009 at 11:09 AM
ok... so this isn't a serious idea, but i just thought i'd look into what was mentioned on here about the brewers and lowe. but mainly, i'd just like to get a brewers fan's opinion, just because i dont know that much about riske. would a trade of lowe for riske seem worthwhile? just looking at it on paper... getting rid of riske would free up $4.5 mill for you guys next year, so the difference would really just be $10.5 for derek lowe, which isnt really all that bad seeing as you know he'll give you close to 200 innings... not to mention he won 15 games last year. $4.5 mill seems like a lot of money to the brewers especially if its for a reliever that only pitched 1 inning last year.
as a braves fan, i'd be fine with it just because we'd solve our rotation issue and free up some much needed cash for the offense. and, if riske is healthy, then that's another piece for the bullpen.
thoughts?
Posted by: blurba | November 14, 2009 at 03:38 PM
"If you are thinking Lowe vs. Vasquez, they both won 15 games. Who cares what the ERA is, if they both had the same record. Then what is the point?"
proeye, I understand your point but you also have to take into account run support when looking at games won.
Lowe got 8.14 RS while Vazquez got 6.44 RS.
That's a pretty big difference, and that would make it alot easier for Lowe to equall Vaz in wins.
Posted by: Cobrasnake | November 14, 2009 at 03:39 PM
Vazquez should be extended to a 3/27 deal which will override his 2010 contract. He is a #1 with quality stuff and is now comfortable and coming into his own. He had almost no run support in 09. Lowe is probably going to have a good/great year but we need to free up money for offensive help. But we should in no way eat any of Lowe's contract, someone will be glad to get him for the money, trust me. Consider keeping them both and trading KK.
Posted by: HahiraBrave | November 15, 2009 at 10:06 AM
If I were GM I would keep Lowe and JV, trade KK, Kelly Johnson, Shaefer, and Acosta.
Iineup:
McClouth CF
Prado 1st
Chipper 3rd
McCann C
Uggla 2nd
Escobar SS
Francouer RF
Diaz LF
SP: JJ, JV, Hanson, Hudson, Lowe, (Medln)
Bullpen: Moylan, Medlin, O'Flaherty, Logan, Marek, Valdez
Setup: Moylan, O'Flaherty, (wish we could keep Gonzalez)
Closer: Soriano
Posted by: HahiraBrave | November 15, 2009 at 10:32 AM