MLB Rumors - MLB Trade Rumors
Subscribe to MLB Trade Rumors using RSS
Home     Contact     About     Advertise     Archives     Widget     Twitter      RSS Usage

« Igarashi To Pursue MLB Next Season | Main | Cubs Talk: Bradley, Trades vs. Free Agency »

Royals Seeking A Catcher

After declining their 2010 option for Miguel Olivo, the Royals are searching for a catcher according to Bob Dutton of The KC Star. Dutton mentions that it would be best for the team to fill their hole behind the plate prior to December 12th, allowing them to non-tender the incumbent John Buck.

“We led all of baseball (last season) in passed balls and wild pitches,” general manager Dayton Moore said. “That will be fixed in 2010. Our defense in general is our main objective to fix before next season.

“And it starts behind the plate.” 

The team has indicated that they aren't ready to hand the starting job over to Brayan Pena, even though he made "significant defensive strides last season."

Dutton mentions one interesting rumor to watch, a "deal sending second baseman Alberto Callaspo to the Los Angeles Dodgers for catcher A.J. Ellis." Callaspo, who hit .300/.356/.457 in 2009, would help fill the Dodgers' second base vacancy, while the 28-year-old Ellis would give KC a defensive standout behind the plate. Ellis also has a career .398 OBP in the minors, with more walks than strikeouts in nearly 1,800 plate appearances.

Even though there are plenty of catching options in free agency, Moore acknowledged that his team prefers to improve their club through trades.

“Our free-agent pursuit will not be as aggressive as in the past,” he said. “We’re going to focus on trades first. We’re going to exhaust every opportunity to make trades.

“In the previous two offseasons, we’ve been more likely to pop a free agent or two early on. I look for us to exhaust every possible trade scenario this offseason before we enter into the free-agent market.”

Tim previewed the trade market for catchers back in October. See any fits?


Comments

It's nice to see Dayton going for defense and OBP, but 28 years old? Surely we can get more for Callaspo than a 28 year old rookie.....

Moore trading for OBP and defense? That's gota sound good for KC fans.

yeah, that'd be nice. A guy on the Royals who walks more than he strikes out? Pinch me, I must be dreaming.

The funny thing is, is we'd be giving up the one guy we already have that walks more than he strikes out.

A 28-year old rookie? Wow, it really does suck to be a Royals fan. Sure, let's trade Callaspo for an unproven player. Sounds like a great plan. Thank God we have Getz to play 2nd now. Maybe we should see if anybody from the T-Bones is available.

Cubs have K Hill. Nice C but hitting ???

In my opinion, sign Rod Barajas through the Free Agent market.

We can get something more useful for Callapso.
If to the Dodgers, I'm thinking George Sherill, but they wouldn't do that straight up. Ronald Belisario maybe. Juan Pierre or James McDonald as well.

Pierre makes like $10 million. I don't want him just for that reason alone. The only way we should trade Callaspo is if we can pair him up with somebody for a legitimate middle of the order bat that is proven. Otherwise, hold onto the guy and maybe he can be part of the future. I can already tell I'm going to want to boycot the Royals next year. Might as well trade Greinke to another team so I can start enjoying baseball again.

That seems like a great deal for the Dodgers, since the team does not project Ellis as anything more than a backup in LA.

Teagarden and a mid tier pitching prospect like Poveda or Beavan or Moscoso for Moose? There is some reason why Teagarden is playing in the AFL instead of winterball...

I might be selling Moose a little short, but I would not be surprised to see a two for one type deal to attempt to bolster both the C position and the back of the rotation or pen. Moose might not be the best fit for a deal, but with the crowded nature of the Royals corners, it might make sense.

Grover, do you have any idea how bad Callapso is at defense? Not to even mention his speed. Unless we fix our defense in Center, Right, Third, Short, and Catcher, we really can't afford to keep him.

I didn't know Pierre made that much, so no for him. I wouldn't be totally upset for Ellis, but I think we can do better.

We got Getz, who isn't amazing but can start at Second. Defense is a much bigger problem for the club then Offense. Hell, replacing Olivo with someone who has an OBP and blocks balls already fixes a big part of the problem.

I'd be happy with Callapso, or without Callapso, depending on who we get. I still support signing Barajas or Zaun and trading callapso for a solid MR (Like McDonald, Belisario, Sherill), or we can look at other clubs.

NOT SAYING HE IS...

but the gang over at Royals authority has an interesting post on Getz, compared to a young Brian Roberts:

http://royalsauthority.com/2009-articles/november/premature-optimistic-analysis-on-an-unofficial-trade.html

First of all it's ok to have a defensive catcher. There are only a very few elite catchers in the league. You can assume risk at that position because most of the teams you play are in the same boat.

That being said, the title of this article should say: "Royals Seeking a Catcher, Right Fielder, Center Fielder, Shortstop, Third Baseman, Second Baseman, Three Starting Pitchers, and Bullpen Help."

That would be more accurate I think.

We can get something more useful for Callapso.
If to the Dodgers, I'm thinking George Sherill, but they wouldn't do that straight up. Ronald Belisario maybe. Juan Pierre or James McDonald as well


The Royals aren't getting Sherrill or Belisario for Callaspo. There's an outside chance of getting McDonald, though even that's unlikely. And why would the Royals want Pierre and his 9 mil salary?

If they want to go on the cheap, they could probably acquire either Robinzon Diaz or pricier Doumit from Pittsburgh. In the past few trades that the Pirates have made, they seem to have taken very little in return for their players. They may also be able to swing a deal for LaRoche, putting a patch on the 3B issue as well. However, Diaz may end up with the Tigers by the end of November.

Almost forgot that the Royals existed, but Torrealba should be an option for them.

Torrealba is horrible and Doumit is a poor man's Olivo. I wouldn't mind trading for one of the Rangers catchers but the price would be high. There really isn't a whole lot of options out there. I agree with what the Royals are trying to do via trade, the free agent options are weak.

You don't throw away a guy who hits 300 with 40 doubles, especially when you are the Royals. I don't care how bad he is defensively. He could be Jim Abbot and if he's hitting like Callaspo did last year, you find a way to hold onto him until you have more guys that can get on base. It can't be all about defense. Are we supposed to fill our batting order with guys "speedy" and "defensive" guys? DM has done a great job with this team eh? Was it even him that scouted Soria, doubtful, yet he gets all the credit. This team is an embarrassment and Callaspo was one of the brighter spots last year, no question. Getz is a rookie coming off an injury, I think it's fair to say we could use Callaspo in 2010 more than some unproven 28 year old rookie catcher.

As a Dodger fan I would hate to see Ellis leave. Kid is nails defensively and seems to be starting to get it offensively. I have never been that enamored with Martin. Ellis seems to be expandable since May is starting to show he can handle the load. Id rather go internally with DeWitt to fill that void at 2nd. Haha to bad it would never happen but id like to snatch Greinke and Bannister. Pierre is slated to make 9 mill this year.
As a dodger fan it would be nice to see
Grienke Bannister
for
Martin Bills and Pierre n maybe Withrow to bad it would never happen.

Callaspo cost us as many games with his glove and baserunning as he won with his bat. He's let balls by him, lost them in the sun, doesn't square up, etc. I'm a better defensive 2B than he is. I'd be fine with DH'ing him, but if we aren't going to do that, we might as well sell high on him before he gets another DWI.

Ha, yeah, trading Callaspo for a high OBP and good defensive catcher. Good luck with that!

If he wants good defense plus any offensive contribution, let alone OBP, he's going to have to part with more than Callaspo.

In the free agent market, according to the analysis, Zaun is the guy to go to if you are looking for OBP and defense, but from what I remember, the Rays got an option on him and are thinking of keeping him.

Out of the others listed, Kendall is the only other one who is good defensively. He would also be only a Type B comp, so no loss to Royals to sign him.

I would have said Molina, partly out of hope, but if Kendall is available for no comp and just a year older than Molina, he's the better choice if you consider everything other than money and years.

I have no idea what Kendall wants, but I do know that Molina wants multi-year and a raise over his $6M, last I heard. Kendall was paid $5M and didn't hit that well overall, so he probably isn't looking for a raise, just a starting job for the same money.

Revive 85, you should go down to the K and talk to DM, show him your mad defensive skills. Can you hit also?

I had never heard of Alberto Callapso before today (or his cousin Manuel Elfoldo) so I looked him up. Aside from his 17 errors last season, it seems his fielding over the course of his brief career is only slightly below average. Good contact hitter, according to the stats. Granted he's not Orlando Hudson defensively, but he doesn't look as bad as some say either.

I've got a counter offer for you, Camron. How about Kershaw and Kemp for Callaspo?? See how ridiculous you sound?

Regardless of how much upside Ellis has, he's most likely not going to be ready for a starting job next season, so the Royals are still going to need someone to fill that role. Why does it seem like there's such a hurry to get rid of Callaspo?

Agree with the ridiculous Greinke talk. He's off limits at this point. No point in even wasting your time. Last year Atlanta fans thought it was ludicrous to consider Hanson in any trade for Greinke. Really?

How about this, we keep Callaspo and put him at 3B, where he is (reportedly) much better at defense. Put Gordon in one OF corner, Fields in the other corner, DeJesus in CF, Getz at 2B and suddenly our defense is a lot better. And we keep the one guy on our team that walks more than he strikes out, hits near .300 and has good doubles power.

If you think Fields and Gordon in the corners makes our defense better, you are crazy. Gordon has never played OF in his life. The only feasible way to keep Callaspo's bat in the lineup is to DH him. Period. He is that bad.

I've got a counter offer for you, Camron. How about Kershaw and Kemp for Callaspo?? See how ridiculous you sound?

Posted by: revive85 | November 09, 2009 at 10:50 AM

Obviously Greinke's got insane value, but Bannister's value is very minimal right now. An offer of Martin, Billingsley, Withrow (will be our top pitching prospect in 2010) along with Pierre (salary would be eaten, something like 14 of 18 mill I'd bet) isn't some ridiculous offer.

Martin had his worst MLB season after having 3 above average seasons in his first 3 MLB seasons, Billingsley is still a young stud SP, anyone who thinks different is a fool, Pierre still has value if most of his contract is eaten by the Dodgers, and Withrow has sick potential and is just 20 or 21 years old. It would take a couple more prospects from the Dodgers most likely in a deal like that, but don't go crazy and bring up Kershaw or Kemp in trade prosposals, that just aint cool, lol.

Well Gordon isn't exactly a defensive wizard at 3B, neither is Fields. Barring any other moves, it might be best to go that route.

Yeah, it's absolutely ridiculous. You can have Bannister. Now let's stop the talk and get back to Callaspo.

Agree with the ridiculous Greinke talk. He's off limits at this point. No point in even wasting your time. Last year Atlanta fans thought it was ludicrous to consider Hanson in any trade for Greinke. Really?

Posted by: Grover'sRoyals | November 09, 2009 at 10:52 AM

With all the rumors the last few months about Felix and what he could bring, Greinke could bring more right now. I know you wouldn't want to trade Greinke away, but just imagine what the Rangers could send you guys to completely restock your farm system....man that could be sick.

Yeah, it's absolutely ridiculous. You can have Bannister. Now let's stop the talk and get back to Callaspo.

Posted by: Grover'sRoyals | November 09, 2009 at 11:07 AM

No, it's really not. I understand why you refuse to trade him, because I wouldn't trade Kershaw or Kemp for anyone, even if there is more value on the other end. But it wasn't some off the wall trade, it was on the way to a trade that could actually work, it just wasn't complete.

So......let me get this straight. A declining catcher, an overpaid CF, and a young starter with "potential".....all those gems and all you want is the best pitcher in baseball? Gee...where can I sign off on that one?

Ridiculous and a waste of time to discuss Greinke. He's locked up and going to win the Cy Young in a week. This post is about Callaspo.

Ridiculous and a waste of time to discuss Greinke. He's locked up and going to win the Cy Young in a week. This post is about Callaspo.

Posted by: Grover'sRoyals | November 09, 2009 at 11:14 AM

It wasn't even my offer, I just know it wasn't some stupid ass trade offer. Maybe you should calm down a bit.

Moving Greinke may be the only option the royals have to one day actually compete. The Royals could fill several holes and free up a little payroll. Dejesus needs to be considered as well. Getz, Gordon, Kila, Butler and Fields is a solid nucleus for the infield. The Royals need a catcher, power outfielders and pitchers galore. Greinke could net two major league ready arms think Bucholtz and Bowden plus a high ceiling A-ball guy and on to that a corner outfield and catching prospect. Dejesus could bring in an arm and solid ss prospect. I have no problem with moving Callapso as well. If the Royals wold just swallow their pride they could end up taking that division in two years. It will never happen tough because DM is an idiot and the fans seem to think Greinke wll win every game.

OK, I'll calm down and you stick to the original point of this post. Deal? FI.

There's a really simple solution to this problem, but I'm sure the Royals won't do it. A few years back, Mitch Maier was converted from a catcher to an outfielder because at the time the Royals has lots of catching depth. So let's just convert him back to a catcher. He can be the backup to Brayan Pena. Then we re-sign Coco Crisp to play center field.

There is a reason he was converted in the first place and depth was not it. Just like Billy Butler used to play 3B.....

Landon Powell is a pretty good hitting/fielding catcher who is blocked by Kurt Suzuki in Oakland, perhaps he would be a fit in KC? Would be interesting to see what he'd be able to do with 400+ PAs in a year.

Trade for Chris Snyder! He's a great defensive catcher and the D-Backs are try to salary dump him. They can get him for nothing.

Folks, Ive watched or been to every Royals game this past year. Callaspo isnt the greatest defensive 2nd baseman in the world for sure, but hes not flat out horrible.

The guy hit 300 and hit his first homeruns in his career this year. Though the Royals need to improve their defense, why get rid of a guy that is hitting 300 and is a doubles machine?

Solution? Put him as a DH and Butler at 1st, where he was most of the season. Then put Getz at 2nd. Then when Butler needs a day off or needs to DH, heck, let Callaspo play 1st. But I wouldnt get rid of a .300 player just like that, because is defense wasnt all that great. There are solutions.

Thank you. People want to get up in arms because Callaspo isn't the next Omar Vizquel (and yes, I know Vizquel is a SS, but you know what I'm saying), but we have to have some sort of offense. We can't be all pitching and speed. In order for the speed to help, don't we need guys to be able to get on base, at least offensively. Also, how many games did Zack lose this year by giving up 2 or fewer runs?

How often did the defense let Zack down? There are bad defensive plays that don't always show up as errors in the boxscore. Listen to Frank on TV, he'll tell you all about how bad Callaspo is and the things he is doing wrong.

Look, I agree Callaspo can hit. My point is he needs to be off of 2B. Either DH him or sell him off for something useful. If he stays at 2B, we aren't improving.

They should also look at the Indians catcher, Kelly Shoppach. With Carlos Santana and Lou Marson coming up, Shoppach becomes expendable.

If we are going to talk about defense....I saw Alex Gordon make his fair share of errors when he came back. That better change next yr. Not to mention, he needs to hit instead of striking out. His poor performance overall is getting old.

I don't think Callaspo's lack of range supercedes his offensive abilities, especially on a team that needs much more than a rangy second baseman. Maybe in a year or two, but not now. JMO.

Agreed on Gordon. I say give him one more year.

Shoppach makes too much. He will make the kind of money Olivo/Buck would command, IMO.

Agreed we need more than a rangy 2B. However, when your teams don't score runs and they aren't fast, you need defense. We have got to start somewhere and keeping one tool players like Callaspo around does no good.

OK, I disagree with you and feel this team needs Callaspo's bat next year more than a rangy 2nd baseman who will hit .240 - .260 and strikeout twice as much as Callaspo, and still have 10-20 errors.

Well, I really dont see Callaspo has a one tool player. I see Mike Jacobs as a one tool player...at that. At least Callaspo is fairly fast and has good baserunning skills.

A huge problem this year was getting on base and scoring runs.

When Greinke lost games of 1-0 or 2-1, that wasnt because of Callaspo's bad defense. It was because we couldnt score any runs. That being said, getting rid of someone that hit .300 and had a career year isnt the way to go. Thats what the DH is for. Good hitters that dont play all that well at defense. Thats why you dont see crappy Jacobs playing the field.

"There is a reason he was converted in the first place and depth was not it. Just like Billy Butler used to play 3B....."

Posted by: revive85 | November 09, 2009 at 12:16 PM

Depth was absolutely the reason Maier was converted from catcher. At the time, John Buck was seen as the catcher of the future. Maier was a first-round draft pick, and the organization didn't want him blocked by Buck. There was nothing wrong with Maier's catching ability; he was switched because he was blocked.

"Solution? Put him as a DH and Butler at 1st, where he was most of the season."

Posted by: NastyNateisGreat | November 09, 2009 at 01:33 PM

Let me get this straight. You've been to or watched 324 games in the last two years and you want to put a guy who hit all 11 of his career home runs last year as your DH? That's what you think is good production from a DH?

Maybe you should watch another 324 games before you comment again. Perhaps you'll learn something. Seriously, your credibility is severely crippled.

We can get something more useful for Callapso.
If to the Dodgers, I'm thinking George Sherill, but they wouldn't do that straight up. Ronald Belisario maybe. Juan Pierre or James McDonald as well


The Royals aren't getting Sherrill or Belisario for Callaspo. There's an outside chance of getting McDonald, though even that's unlikely. And why would the Royals want Pierre and his 9 mil salary?"

Um, how'd we get from Ellis to Sherrill or Belisario? Sherrill and Belisario are legit late inning guys, while Ellis is a backup. McDonald will be in a package for an ace or power bat(Uggla/Gonzalez), not for a fringe 2B(ie, good average with little power, bad D).

"As a Dodger fan I would hate to see Ellis leave. Kid is nails defensively and seems to be starting to get it offensively. I have never been that enamored with Martin. Ellis seems to be expandable since May is starting to show he can handle the load. Id rather go internally with DeWitt to fill that void at 2nd. Haha to bad it would never happen but id like to snatch Greinke and Bannister. Pierre is slated to make 9 mill this year.
As a dodger fan it would be nice to see
Grienke Bannister
for
Martin Bills and Pierre n maybe Withrow to bad it would never happen."

NO NO NO NO NO! Ellis is a backup, thats it. Nothing more. If you think he is anywhere close to Martin, you havent been paying attention lately...

With your proposal, You want to trade a top 3 catcher in the NL whos still young, a pitcher who was 4th in WAR on the Dodgers this year and had a bad 2nd half after a GREAT 1st half, while coming back from a broken leg, Pierre(eh), and Withrow, who has the same ace potential that Billingsley has. NO NO NO NO NO. I know Grienke is great, but that hurts the team in SO many ways for one main piece, that it makes no sense. Id say the same thing if we were talking about Felix or Agon either.

"So......let me get this straight. A declining catcher, an overpaid CF, and a young starter with "potential".....all those gems and all you want is the best pitcher in baseball? Gee...where can I sign off on that one?"

Oh boy, where to start? Declining catcher? he had ONE BAD YEAR!!!! He was instructed to lost 20Lbs over the offseason to stay healthy by the Dodgers and had his swing tinckered with by Mattingley all season. And his defense remained the same. Oh, and maybe his offensive decline has something to do with 500 GAMES PLAYED AT CATCHER SINCE 06. Thats ridiculos.

And potential isnt when a guy has posted a 2.7 ERA through half a year, then his leg began acting up from surgery and still finished with a respectible ERA.

Pierre sucks as a bench guy, but at 4M as a starter, he'd have a lot of value.

And Withrow has a crap load of potential, whether you want to admit it or not. That would be a crazy offer for any one player.

Pena's gonna be a good young catcher, give him a shot. The Royals should be looking to fill holes in the outfield first. You can count on Guillen being {injured} at least 80% of the season and we have no center fielder. That is the biggest need on the team. Oh yeah, either trade Soria or make him a starter. He is going to waste in the bullpen.

Otis, a DH that hits .300 or more...sure I'd take that anyday. What, are you implying a DH is nothing more than a homerun hitter? Suuuure,so what is your solution for DH, crappy Mike Jacobs or an injured Jose Guillen? Then bench a .300 hitter? Thats absurd.

Have you watched any of the games the last two years or just watch highlights? Not sure why your talking smack anyways, its pretty obvious your uneducated in the game of baseball...Otis.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment


Top Stories



Search MLBTR

Lijit Search

MLBTR Features



Recent Posts


MLBTR Mailing List

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Rumors By Team



Monthly Archives


Live Chats


Tuesdays at 2 p.m. CST



Site Map     Contact     About     Advertise     Privacy Policy     Widget     Twitter     Rss Feed


MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com.