![]() |
|
|
| |
« Kevin Mench DFA'd | Main | Tim On Baseball Prospectus Radio »
Feel free to hit up the MLBTR mailbag at mlbtraderumors@gmail.com.
Do you think it is really in the Reds' best interest to even talk about moving a prospect such as Homer Bailey or Joey Votto for Erik Bedard? - Ryan
If it's a deal centered around Bailey and Votto, then yes. The NL Central is winnable and neither player is a sure thing. Bedard could be a Cy Young contender in that division.
In terms of "interesting rumblings" that come up at the end of the winter meetings, with new potential deals in the mix, what is circling around about the Angels? I haven't heard a thing about any deals and logic has to suggest that they are at least TRYING to get a big bat somewhere. - Scott
I agree, the Angels' hot stove has been very quiet lately. I would not be surprised to see them get Scott Rolen though. Troy Glaus is another one I could see.
Where do you see Fukudome signing and when do you think it will happen? - Terrence
I see Fukudome landing with the Cubs at three years, $42MM. I think it happens this week.
Have the White Sox given up on Brian Anderson? Despite the fact he is not hitting, he is such a gazelle in CF. Have they considered trading him? What is the current situation? - Karena
Yes, I think they've given up on him. Anderson and the White Sox just don't see eye to eye. I would be surprised if he's not traded before Opening Day.
This is such a pathetic question: What does each number mean when you write something like "He hit .267/.305/.441 for the..."? Sigh, I feel embarrassed even asking. - Amish
That is not a dumb question at all - it's my fault for not being more clear. When I do the "triple slash" stats like that it refers to AVG/OBP/SLG.
Who do you see Alexei Ramirez signing with...Not much has been said about him so far this off season. Do you think the Cardinals might be players with him or not? - Alireza
I don't see the Cards going after him; their priority is starting pitching. I could see the White Sox getting Ramirez. He could compete for the second base job if the Sox trade Juan Uribe. He might be able to help out in center field, and the presence of fellow Cuban defector Jose Contreras might help his transition to the United States.
What happened to the Needs/Luxuries postings for each team? I really enjoyed reading them. And as a Phils fan I was looking forward to other opinions on what the team needs/doesn't need. - Mike
It's been a while since I made a new entry in this series, due to the demands of the Winter Meetings and other things. Look for them to resume around January.
Any teams rumored to be interested in Juan Pierre? - Eric
Chris DeLuca thinks he might be a fit for the White Sox. I wouldn't be surprised if the Sox are at least mulling him over. It's the four more years that's the problem. Many teams might get involved if it was one or two years. The Rangers have also been connected to Pierre, but I think he stays put.
I'd like to hear your thoughts in further depth about the Milledge trade by the Mets. - Mike
My feeling is that if Schneider and Church was the best Omar Minaya could get, he was better off keeping Milledge to play right field. Milledge isn't even 23; he hasn't really gotten a chance. And being cocky seems to be the worst offense he's committed recently. I would've just made Castro the full-time catcher and tried Milledge in right.
The Orioles have said they want to rebuild around young pitching, so why is there zero talk about trading Nick Markakis for Lincecum or Cain? - David
I could almost see this working, but building around young pitching doesn't mean you have to trade your star outfielder. Markakis was quietly excellent as a 23 year-old. Swapping him for Lincecum adds risk for the Orioles. Also, he's a fan/Peter Angelos favorite from what I've read.
Please, please, please get rid of the white on black. let me know when you do. - Matthew
Maybe one day...but in a survey this year 2/3 of MLBTR readers said to keep it the way it is. I know 2/3 isn't an overwhelming majority. But I feel the white on black has become part of the MLBTR brand. Only thing I don't like about it is that it might make it harder for you to covertly read at work.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/447826/33581622
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Mailbag: Bedard, Fukudome, Alexei, Pierre:


|
|
For the question about the white on black, just hit control+A to make it blue on white.
Posted by: | December 10, 2007 at 01:38 PM
Theres a shocker!! A Cubs based website predicting that the Cubs will land Fukudome.
Posted by: | December 10, 2007 at 01:44 PM
Okay, I'm a Reds fan and I really want Bedard. That said, there's no way the Orioles are going to trade the only good young position players they have in Markakis.
That division is just brutal, even the Rays are better than they are now. Blow it up Angelos.
I just wonder how much value they can get for Bedard, Tejada and Roberts when everyone knows how bad they're going to be this year.
Posted by: bweav44 | December 10, 2007 at 01:47 PM
Speaking of covert work reading...those talking ads suck.
Posted by: Dave | December 10, 2007 at 01:51 PM
I agree with changing the white on black to black on white.
Look at newspapers or graphics on TV, it's always black on white for a reason - it's easier to see.
Posted by: Basura | December 10, 2007 at 01:51 PM
bweav44, you bring up an interesting point. They say talks broke down between the Orioles and Astros last week regarding Tejada because Baltimore is asking for a "Johan Santana" like trade offer. I think everyone outside of Baltimore knows that the Orioles are trying to get rid of Tejada's salary and that Bedard wont sign an extension there, so they have to trade both. They arent going to get a Kings ransom for either player.
Posted by: | December 10, 2007 at 01:52 PM
I don't think Fukudome to the Cubs is a biased prediction at all.
Posted by: Tim Dierkes | December 10, 2007 at 01:55 PM
unless you are biased towards reporting the general consensus.
Posted by: Dave | December 10, 2007 at 02:08 PM
I like the white on black - don't change it!
However, you could always put a button up top that was either session-based or cookie based... clicking it swapped the blck and white text colors, border colors, and background colors. Not too hard, I'd imagine.
Posted by: KingCorran | December 10, 2007 at 02:11 PM
keep the black screen for three reasons:
a) it's greener. your computer uses less energy when a website uses a black background then it would "brightening" a white screen.
b) most of the screens i have to use at work at black. not like anyone would care.
c) the cool factor. the black screen gives MLBTR it's own identity. one of the best things about MLBTR is that it seperates itself from every other sports/news/blog site that uses white.
Posted by: totallysuperawesome | December 10, 2007 at 02:12 PM
Hard for me, King, but a savvy web design person probably could pull it off. Could be a January initiative.
Posted by: Tim Dierkes | December 10, 2007 at 02:13 PM
I also operate a white-on-black blog. I think it's actually easier to read. The black on white orthodoxy is based on the idea that computer screens are like paper-- they aren't.
Posted by: John Peterson | December 10, 2007 at 02:14 PM
Long live the monochrome!
Posted by: WHIPit | December 10, 2007 at 02:18 PM
Your RotoAuthority.com site is a primo example of a site that's easy to read.
You could still do everything else in the white on black (such as the links, borders, etc.), but the sit is terrible to read as it is right now.
A couple of suggestions for people who have a hard time reading MLBTR:
One thing that I do when I read MLBTR is press CTL+the scroll button on my mouse. This helps increase the font and makes it easier to read for people with vision problems like me.
Another thing I do when I read your site is highlight the area of the site that I want to read with the mouse. The resulting blue on white highlighted area might make it easier for people who have a hard time reading the white on black.
Posted by: IowaCubs | December 10, 2007 at 02:21 PM
O's definitely don't have the leverage right now, so it'll be interesting to see how this plays out.
I think the fact that they have Bedard under a resonable contract for two years helps them, and hurts suitors, but Tejada isn't going to net all that much. He's on the downside of his career too. Personally I like Roberts better as an all around player but Tejada's RBI totals are hard to overlook.
I don't understand any NL team going after him though, as he's more valuable were he can DH some games I'd think.
Anyhow, all that said I'm hoping this is a buyers market.
Posted by: | December 10, 2007 at 02:32 PM
You can change the white-on-black without having to go with black-on-white. How about green?
Posted by: johansantana17 | December 10, 2007 at 04:25 PM
One more thing...Who are those guys at the top of the MLBTradeRumors homepage?
Posted by: johansantana17 | December 10, 2007 at 04:28 PM
Keep the Black and White!!! That's this sites distinct style. I like the low key approach, not overwhelmed with ads and graphics, just straight to the point. Plus, it's easy on the eyes.
As for the 3 players on the top banner: The first one looks like Shin-Soo Choo, former Mariner(as seen on the jersey), and now a Cleveland Indian. The second one, I can't tell, but the 3rd player looks to be wearing a Cardinals Jersey, and looks a lot like Jim Edmonds.
Posted by: Chillin | December 10, 2007 at 05:40 PM
Great site.
I would increase the width to reduce the amount of scrolling.
Posted by: bjsguess | December 10, 2007 at 06:00 PM
Thanks Chillin. I think the middle guy is wearing a Nats hat, if that helps. How 'bout having guys on their that are being discussed as part of blockbuster trades (Santana, Haren, Tejada, Bedard)?
Posted by: johansantana17 | December 10, 2007 at 06:18 PM
I'm not sure how the Orioles don't have leverage in this situation. They don't HAVE to trade Bedard, but they'd obviously love to and benefit from trading him. Moreover, there are several teams in the mix for his services, each with a chock load of young talent to trade. Doesn't a scenario like this count as leverage?
Posted by: | December 10, 2007 at 08:20 PM
I think the black on white should stay. Like you said, it's become the brand of MLBTR--anything else would be strange!
I also look at it this way: reading the rumours here is like dreaming in black and white, and when you wake up to some of them that become true, you wake up to a vibrant, technicolor reality :)
Posted by: Sunny Reiser | December 10, 2007 at 08:21 PM
I cant believe talkin about the freakin colors of the page dominated the comments like it did. Keep the white print on black, by the way, HAHA. Anyway, I think the site is extremely fair to all teams, just cuz dude is a Cubs fan and is interested in the team, they consider the site bias. I actually think this site could use a little more Cub talk. I think the people who bitch about this site frequent it more often than the ones who enjoy it. I'd keep pissing them off seems to be good for business. PS the control+A thing works for the pansies who cant deal with the black
Posted by: goathedxxx | December 10, 2007 at 11:06 PM
Yeah this site definitely isn't biased toward any team. I mean, Fukodome obviously is going to sign with the Cubs.
Posted by: johansantana17 | December 11, 2007 at 09:06 PM