![]() |
|
|
| |
« Reds Rumors: Bedard, Prior | Main | Rockies To Sign Luis Vizcaino? »
UPDATE, 12-13-07 at 10:20am: Rosenthal confirms this signing; it kind of flew under the radar. Pretty cheap at $1.5MM per year.
UPDATE, 12-12-07 at 1:57pm: My Japanese-speaking friend says that this article indicates Fukumori signed with Texas for two years and $3MM. The $1.5MM salary is about twice what he made in '07. Fukumori also had offers from the Pirates and Rays.
FROM 12-12-07 at 9:08am:
According to Evan Grant, the Rangers are "on the verge" of signing Japanese reliever Kazuo Fukumori. It would be a two-year deal.
As many as 10 teams were said to be interested in Fukumori, including the Yankees, Nationals, Royals, and Red Sox. Ken Davidoff recently spoke to a scout who described Fukumori as "not bad."
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e2010534ba4d91970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Rangers Signing Fukumori:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
Well, now. This should generate as much positive excitement as .... signing a broken down Milton Bradley. Or a Chris Shelton. Or a Franklyn German. Or .....
JD went into the offseason talking about dining at Mortons, but has ended up in a booth at Taco Bell.
Posted by: the stork | December 12, 2007 at 10:21 AM
I guess they were heavy bidders for Fukudome. I hope Rangers fans don't go into next year with Bradley as their centerpiece offseason move.
Posted by: Oh Boy | December 12, 2007 at 02:19 PM
Stork: What's your deal? What do you really have against the Rangers? Are you Pete Incaviglia in real life?
What's wrong with the Fukomori signing? Low risk deal...and now Otsuka has a friend.
Posted by: mtex | December 12, 2007 at 02:22 PM
3 million times 10 probably
Posted by: iknowtomuch | December 12, 2007 at 02:31 PM
$3 for 2 years? really? for a "not bad" releiver? i thought they went for 10mil a year these days.
Posted by: totallysuperawesome | December 12, 2007 at 02:47 PM
So are the Rangers the worst franchise in MLB? That's just sad.
Posted by: jatorres | December 12, 2007 at 02:50 PM
everyone should do the favor and babelfish translate the japanese website. it's glorious.
"the Sendai protection God moves the stage to Texas." classic.
Posted by: totallysuperawesome | December 12, 2007 at 02:55 PM
For the price, it's an extremely low risk, decent reward signing. Admittedly, the Rangers bullpen is fairly stacked as it is, but this gives them some flexibility if they want to listen to offers on Benoit, Wilson, Otsuka, etc.
Also, if Fukumori plays well, they can deal him for more prospects.
Posted by: Michael | December 12, 2007 at 02:55 PM
Mtex,
Otsuka may be his friend, but they won't be on the same team.
Posted by: Chillin | December 13, 2007 at 10:57 AM
It's all good mtex - I actually like the Incaviglia comment. And since you asked, I'll tell you what I have against the Rangers - the team's Mgt stated a plan and goals for the offseason that they simply have not lived up to, and cannot live up to.
The primary goal that was set was the acquisition of a CF - there were plenty of options so the team should have no problem getting a new star to solidify what has been discussed for decades as a position of weakness. (I actually thought a lot of Darryl Hamilton, but that's another story). The team also stated that with payroll being lower, that it had an opportunity to take advantage of other teams' payroll woes. This may not have been a stated goal, but it was a stated opportunity.
While I can support adding Bradley, I do so because he doesn't block a prospect, and at the ASB he likely brings us a prospect or two in a trade (if healthy). But the team adding second-tier FAs was specifically dismissed by Rangers Management at the beginning of the off-season as something that they were not interested in doing. (I'll conceed the 1yr contract point.) The team was only interested in adding premier talent GM Jon Daniels has said.
I could continue to ramble on, but my point is that the names I listed above are a far cry from premier talent. Furthermore, I cannot currently be convinced that the Rangers are committed to rebuilding (or even youth) by some who point to the fact that they won't make trades involving youth. It IS a positive step (and cause for optimism for long-suffereing supporters) that people who should know say the Rangers' minor league system is greatly improved, but the upper levels of the minors are STILL very weak. For an example, the team just traded its starting AAA 2B for Ben Broussard - a guy who was going to be non-tendered. This is where the team's current plan of waiting on youth falls WAY short - there's very little help coming in the next two years. So take best case scenario, and the A+ and AA player make it to the majors in 2010 - then they are rookies who will struggle - they're not going to take the league by storm.
The goal that this team will compete in 2009 or 2010 is simply not attainable given the current approach, and that, in a nutshell, is my problem.
Well, that and only getting to see the sun on the weekends.
Posted by: the stork | December 13, 2007 at 11:39 AM