MLB Rumors - MLB Trade Rumors
Subscribe to MLB Trade Rumors using RSS
Home     Contact     About     Advertise     Archives     Widget     Twitter      RSS Usage

« The Left Fielder Market | Main | Twins Add Breslow »

Left-Handed Power Options For Cubs

Lou Piniella seemingly wouldn't mind a left-handed power hitter on his team, even if he's not complaining about it.  It's fair to assume the Cubs are locked in at first base, third base, and left field.  That makes the left-handed power pursuit much more challenging.

We can probably rule out Adam Dunn, Raul Ibanez, Chad Tracy, Barry Bonds, Aubrey Huff, and Hank BlalockKosuke Fukudome could be shifted to center field, but none of these guys could handle right regularly.

I came up with three possibly available players who can play right field, somewhat.  I'm thinking of Eric Hinske, Milton Bradley, and Ken Griffey Jr.  Putting Bradley in right field with no DH option seems dangerous, and recent chatter says Junior's staying put.  Hinske, who is hitting .257/.340/.542 in 162 plate appearances, seems the best target.  Keep in mind that this is just one guy's opinion, not a trade rumor.


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e200e5528cffb58833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Left-Handed Power Options For Cubs:

Comments

No thanks to all three.

If the Rangers trade Bradley, it's going to have to be for more value than 2 high draft picks because he'll surely be a Type A FA. Would the cubs pony up? Probably not.

Said it before, say it again ~ the team might want to make sure Fukudome can actually hit American pitching before bringing in someone that would move him to the 2 spot…

I mean, over the teams first 20 games he hit:
.357 / .477 / .500 in 86 PA, with 16 BB, 2 IBB and 13 K
Since then, his line has looked like:
.274 / .363 / .376 in 136 PA, with 17 BB, 2 IBB and 18 K

His numbers just keep dropping as well, last 14 he’s looking at .260 / .362 / .300… The team should probably do what they planned to begin with and just bring in Roberts already…

Move Fukudome to Center, DeRosa becomes the regular RF and Fontenot/Cedeno ride the pine seeing as neither can hit a damn now that their respective weeks worth of production is over… (Fontenot April 29th - May 5th, Cedeno April 19th – 26th…)

Why can't Soriano just move to right field?

Lugo bats left handed and is a powerhouse, you can have him for free. Just don't look up those things I said.

i dont think they need a lefty power bat. They just need a solid lefty. The answer is Nate McLouth. He is a lefty, he bats leadoff well, and he is a CF. He also has some power, with 12 HRs already (one off his career high). He would be expensive, but he is the kind of guy the Cubs need.

Yep, I agree with cubbyrick. I wouldn't want any of the three. My heart would love to see KGJ in Cubbie pinstripes, but his production is falling too badly to really make a difference. He would be a real injury risk playing a brutal right field at Wrigley.

As far as Bradley goes, no way. The Cubs have excellent chemistry and a great clubhouse right now, and he could cause more damage than good. I don't think he'd like Cubs fans either.

Hinske? No.

They should've pushed hard to get Hamilton last offseason, and I said that from the beginning. If they didn't have the chips or the Reds didn't want to trade him within the division, they should've brought a 3rd team into it.

The Cubs best bet at this point is to simply give Hoffpauir some time in RF, while moving Fukudome to center for the majority of the time. If it doesn't work, it doesn't work. They'd just move back to the current configuration, which isn't bad at all.

that would give them a lineup of:

1) McLouth
2) Theriot
3) Lee
4) ARam
5) Fukudome
6) Soto
7) Soriano
8) DeRosa
9) Pitcher

I'll chime in and give a 3rd to to notion of not wanting those three options.

Why would the Pirates just ship off McLouth to the Cubs??

If/when Andruw Jones comes back would the Dodgers with Andre Either be a possible option for the Cubs? Not exactly a "power-bat" but something better than the three previously available

the would do it because they need more than just him. If you give up enough, anyone is available.

I would start with giving up Hill, Pie, and Ceda. If it takes more, do it. Pittsburgh is years away from doing anything, so stockpiling young talent and selling guys when their value is highest should be their top concern.

"the would do it because they need more than just him. If you give up enough, anyone is available."

It would take a huge offer for the Pirates to move McLouth I'd think. He's fairly young, cheap, and under team control for what, like 4 or 5 more years? Moving McLouth would be very low on the priority list, behind guys like Bay, Nady, LaRoche, Grabow, Marte.

Sabinus,

I agree, but is McLouth worth that much to the Cubs? Is he really a game changer that the entire farm needs to be shipped off to get him? Just asking, I'm not a Cubs fan so I have no idea what they have in the systems in terms of talent the Bucco's might want.

If McLouth can bring the best package back its the guy you move. Who knows if he is going to continue playing like this, its far beyond what he has shown in the past. Strike while the iron is hot. Idealy they would like to keep him, but if a team comes calling offering young guys for him, but wont do a deal for anyone else, you must consider it.

he would be a game changer. The cubs are in a win now mode. If they can finally get the LF leadoff batter they tried to get in the offseason they should. They could swing it without giving up anyone on the big leage roster (maybe Cedeno goes if they want him). Plus, with the Roberts talk it was at a position the didnt need, but they do need a CF. He seems to be the perfect fit. I think the cubs really think they can win this year, so over pay for that last piece if you have to.

I HIGHLY doubt Griffey, if at all traded, is going to another NL Central team. Plus as far as I can tell(I'm not well versed in their farm system though) the Cubs don't have anything that would have value to the Reds so that'd be a lose-lose for the Reds.

How about Ryan Church.

the cubs have plenty to interest the reds. Its a matter of wanting to give up enough for how much the reds think he is worth.

I know they want a lefty but what about moving Fukudome to CF and getting Matt Holliday for RF. Thats a big bat to add to the best offence in baseball right now. Supossedly he is going available. Any thoughts?

I like the McClouth idea too, would he be available?

How about Giles? Im certain he would be available. I wouldnt be opposed to Bradley playing CF.

like i said, for the right price anyone is available. The cubs would dump big z today for the right price. No one is truely untouchable.

Not a fan of giles. He cant really hit leadoff anyone, and he doesnt have power. There are better options out there. Holliday would be an interesting choice, but his price tag is going to be massive.

The downside to obtaining McLouth is that he wouldn't get to hit against the Cubs anymore.

Holliday would be interesting. A line up of:

1) Soriano
2) Fukudome
3) Lee
4) ARam
5) Holliday
6) Soto
7) DeRosa
8) Theriot

that would be a tough lineup.

We have the money to pay him, and I think we could put a package together for Holliday. Just speculating but would this be enough Pie/Hill/Murton/Ceda/Patterson/Veal

Why the hell would the Mets give the Cubs Ryan Church?

I like the lineup...Here is another good one.

Theriot
Fukudome
Lee
ARam
Holliday
Soriano
Soto
DeRosa

Either one is sweet.

Id take Church but what makes you think the Mets are throwing in the towel? Do NY teams ever throw in the towel? Plus hes hurt right now.

Since when does Holliday bat LH??? This post is about LH bats...if we open it up to anyone then its just another lame post. Lets stick to the original topic. thanks!

I think Giles would be fine. Hed hit 25homers if he wasnt playing in that ocean at petco

How quickly people forget that the Cubs already have Reed Johnson who is hitting .276 against lefties. He might play even better given the chance to play everyday. This seems a lot like Theriot last year... but eventually... Ryan kept the starting spot and now we have a pretty solid SS.

Johnson has one error through 38 games and a couple of catches that would even make Jim Edmonds take notice.

So many people are so quick to dismiss the fact that the Cubs may have all the offensive players already in place... how about looking more towards another starter... because Gallagher is great for a quick fix... but to go deep in the playoffs... the Cubs need another solid pitcher. maybe Maddux?

Giles is not the Answer...not a lot of power and he is old.

Since when does Reed bat LH? We are getting off the subject here. Lou wants a LH bat with power. Not a RH bat with no power.

Maddux? Hes not much of an improvment over what we have. No thanks.

McLouth is not available, that's pretty clear...

tim thats a bunch of BS. everyone is available for the right price.

Are you kidding me? Maddux not much of an improvement? Not an improvement over Marquis? Maddux would be an awesome upgrade as a #5 for us and leadership in the playoffs would be sweet.

Sometimes Cubs fans act just like Yankee fans. Other teams are supposed to give their good young players to the Cubs because...well, I guess because the Cubs think they should. No way does Huntington move McClouth. And I think the Reds will be buyers rather than sellers. With Bruce in the line-up, if the Reds could muster one decent LH staring pitcher they'll be nipping at the Cubs heels at the all-star break.

For the right deal the pirates would certainly move McLouth. They wont be able to steal him like the did ARam, but they can get him if they want him.

The pirates are really bad, and they wont get any better by keeping their hot guys. Strike while the iron is hot, and improve your overall talent.

You will see the Reds will be sellers.

my problem with Maddux would be, is he enough of an upgrade? We need a #2 or 3 pitcher, not a #5. If its not someone who would pitch in the playoffs we dont need to mess with him.

Tim is right, McClouth is not going to be for sale, it is intriguing though. We wouldnt want to pay the price for McClouth even if they wanted to move him.

"tim thats a bunch of BS. everyone is available for the right price"

Sabinus, if you really think that then why even mention Nate McLouth? If anyone is available for the right price, why not mention Curtis Granderson or Josh Hamilton instead?

Sure, "everyone is available for the right price" but be realistic about it and Nate McLouth getting traded to the Cubs is unrealistic as he's cheap, under club control for an extremely long time and has high upside whereas they have loads of other talent to get rid of who aren't.

because the price is lower for McLouth. They have other talent, but no one else on their roster is going to bring in talent from the Cubs. and only Bay can bring as much talent in return as Nate can.

The cost of McLouth might be too much, but to suggest he isnt available is rediculous. He is the perfect fit for the Cubs, so they should look long and hard at him.

The price tag for Nate McLouth is actually pretty high right now.

He's probably going to be the everyday RF once they move Nady and bring up McCutchen.

And so what if no one ele on their roster is going to bring in talent from the Cubs? There are plenty of other teams willing to buy with much better talent to trade that the Pirates can deal with.

They're not limited to dealing with the Cubs and they're not in a position where they're being forced to move McLouth.

I still think that Holliday would be better then McClouth even if he was available. Pricetag isnt going to be greatly different.

“How quickly people forget that the Cubs already have Reed Johnson who is hitting .276 against lefties. He might play even better given the chance to play everyday.”

…Johnson? His Week-Of-Production came in his first with the club (April 4-10) ~ otherwise he has hit .234/.313/.336/.649. Yet you want to give him the fulltime CF job? Interesting…


“The cost of McLouth might be too much, but to suggest he isnt available is rediculous. He is the perfect fit for the Cubs, so they should look long and hard at him.”

…But to pick a not-yet-Arb up and coming star off a team which includes guys like Bay, LaRoche, Wilson, etc and say “he is the one to trade” ~ well, isnt that just flat out illogical? Teams trade the guys that don’t fit into their longterm plans, not the building blocks of their club! Its like saying the Dodgers should trade Matt Kemp and James Loney to bring in guys who might help their offense next year ~ its 4 steps back to maybe take a step forward while ignoring the big box marked "Garage Sale" that you set your coffee cup on…

The only way you trade McClouth is if you dont think he will keep this up and want to take advantage of people overpaying for his current play. Otherwise, he is exactly the person you keep and build around...

Why would the Rays trade Hinske? Last time I checked, they were first in the American League East.

You can have Brad Wilkerson if you want.

So you think Maddux pitching RELIEF in the playoffs would be a major upgrade?? Most 5th starters dont even make the playoff roster dude.

'sigh' I dont think the Pirates are going to be trading with the Cubs after we stole Lofton and Ramirez from them for Bobby Hill

Pipe Dream Time:

When Bavasi gets fired and a new GM comes in to rebuild the Mariners. Then...

Cubs get: Ichiro & Bedard
M's get: Entire Cub farm system

He would be a great addition to the "Rotation" in the playoffs He would be a 5th starter (maybe 4th) until the playoffs.

Zambrano
Lilly
Dempster
Maddux
Gallagher

Gov that might be a good trade HA I like it

uww1,

So your idea is to go out and get a 5th starter then start him once the playoffs role around? If the Cubs would do that,then no wonder they havent won in 100years.

I say the Cubs trade for Hideki Matsui, my boys in blue always need pitching...

You are not very bright are you? I would pick up a starter whether that be Maddux or not. I think he would be a good addition to rotation to get rid of Marquis. He would start ASAP and would start in the playoffs.

Hideki Matsui would be interesting. Who would they want for him? I had read somewhere Lilly for Matsui...I am not sure about that, but we will see.

Lilly used to be a yankee...I assume the yanks would want some younger players...maybe a young starter to help replace Mussina/Pettite once they are gone. I would do Hill+1, but I'm not quite sure that's fair.

I would do that. But I dont know if they would go for that? Hill plus who?

I'm not to enamored anymore with Hughes and Kennedy...which is why I say I would want another starter.

I'm not quite sure...maybe a hard throwing prospect...I would love it if they could some how get Mármol (that guy has nasty stuff, although I feel like hes going Lou is wearing him out)

"We have the money to pay him, and I think we could put a package together for Holliday. Just speculating but would this be enough Pie/Hill/Murton/Ceda/Patterson/Veal"

I highly doubt that Rookies would have any interest in Murton or Pie, they have outfielders, and Taveras is Pie, low avg. decent OBS, great speed.
The thing they would require is arms, lots of them. Gallagher/Veal/Ceda, and the other position in need or 2nd and catcher. That what more than likely they would ask for Holliday. Meaning the three arms an either a 2nd base or catcher prospect.
Anyways, I don't think that the cubs would pay that kind of price, since he hits right handed to begin with.

As a Padres fan i can tell you that Giles doesn't fit the Power bat idea, but he does fit the idea of a high OBS guy to get on in front of your big sluggers. And any trade for MadDog would have to be approved form him, as such it is believed that if traded he would like to return to Atlanta or all others. (Thats a local rumor, I have not seen anything officially yet)

Marmol is untouchable, hahaha sorry :)

Donaldson/Pie/Hill/Ceda/Patterson for Holliday

Donaldson is a hell of a catching prospect

Maybe that would work...

or= above sorry about that

UWW1 is calling me stupid for simply shooting down his idea of using a 5th starter in the 3 man playoff rotation....I still dont see his logic, am i missing something? Dont you usually use your 3 best pitchers in the playoffs? ehhh...'sigh'

you were saying maddux wouldnt be an upgrade

Arms UWW1, arms, they need pitching. They are going to want arms with upside, Veal/Gallagher/Ceda, and maybe others with Donaldson, but like I said Pie makes no sense. And Hill is not enough, and you know it. They would want Gallagher over Hill.

Im not sure the Cubs are concerned about giving up prospects for 41 yr old 5th starter. I personally would rather see a young guy get a chance. Gallagher is pitching well as of late.

I never said to use a 5th starter in the playoffs. I said if maddux was on our team he would start. Read above

How cheap would Hinske be? Wouldnt it make a lot more sense for the Yanks to trade Abreu then Matsui? Seems like if they stay near the cellar he'll should be available at the deadline. Who knows if theyll sell tho.

Your right about Gallagher pitching well. But Maddux isnt going to be super expensive and he would help us as a leader when we win the division and will help in the playoffs.

Gallagher for Burnett - if Burnett waives his opt out then toss in 2 out of Hill/Veal/Donaldson/Colvin/Ceda. Playoff rotation of Zambrano/Burnett/Lily/Dempster might be just good enough

I wouldnt mind Burnett but I feel thats too much to give for him. Will he be able to get through this season and stay off the DL

I still like trying to see if they could accomplish in getting Matt Holliday.

Donaldson/Ceda/Veal/Hill/Pie

I have been bored all day. I have been sitting around waiting to go play golf and its raining. I am a teacher we had our last day of school Tuesday. HAHA

I wouldnt give up on Hill just yet. He was a top 40 pitcher last year.

How about Ceda/Veal/Gall/Cendeno for Burnett?

That would not be a terrible deal for Burnett, but remember his injury history and the fact that he can Opt out this year.
As for Holliday, i still think you are overlooking the fact that Pie is not what the Rockies are going to for. And they would almost certainly require Gallagher.

Our 3 top pitching prospects for Burnett who we are not sure if he will be around after the year or even stay healthy for the rest of the season? I am not so sure. He would look great in Cubbie Blue but...

I have not yet given up on Hill but I wouldnt mind using him as a trade prospect.

I like Holliday a lot. He hits lefties and righties very well and could take the pressure off DeRosa and Soto to produce at the back half of the lineup. However, the Rockies will most likely ask for way, way too much to make him a viable trade target. Plus, as others have mentioned, the Cubs don't match up well with the Rockies.

There is also Jeff Salazar from the Diamondbacks: young, talented, bats left-handed, and blocked by Justin Upton for the next decade.

If the Padres keep losing (very likely with no Peavy or Young for a stretch), then Giles will be available for peanuts in about 6 weeks. He might be the most viable solution of the group, assuming the other NL Central teams don't want to trade within the division.

And, I'll take Marshall and Gallagher over Mad Dog. It's not like these young starters would see the light of day in meaningful playoff games. C'mon, if you think it gets beyond Z, Lilly, Dempster at the front-end and Howry, Marmol, Wood at the back-end then it's a quick exit for the Cubbies.

Fukudome can, has, and will hit American pitching. There is no reason to even argue that point. No one around baseball even questions this...

Holliday would require a true bounty. Something like HIll, Gallagher, Ceda, and Patterson.

I don't think you move Fukudome, who is a GG calibur RF, to put him in a position where he will be average.

Starting pitching is the need here, the rest are just nice to haves...

Burnett would be an awesome addition, especially if there was a way to have him waive the opt out and sign him to an extension.

Maybe Hill or Gallagher, Murton or Marshall, and Colvin or Ceda?

I think Hill, Gallagher, Ceda, Patterson would not get Holliday. I think we would have to add Donaldson and Veal. I think that might do it. That would be one hell of a line up.

Soriano
Fukudome
Lee
Ramirez
Holliday
Soto
DeRosa
Theriot

That would be fun to watch

To this point in the season the Cubs have the best offense in the majors, wouldn't a solid starting pitcher make more sense? Their staff is doing quite well all things considered but with Hill lounging in the minors the back end of the staff Gallagher/Marquis/Leiber don't really inspire much confidence. Gallagher is young, Leiber is old and Marquis is Marquis.

Jim Edmonds sucker-punched my grandmother.

“Fukudome can, has, and will hit American pitching. There is no reason to even argue that point. No one around baseball even questions this...”

So why are they moving him down further in the lineup if he is really going to be moved to the 2 spot? I mean, its not like Soto is tearing it up right now (.232/.325/.420 last 20 games) ~ but bringing in a power Leftie moves Fukudome to the 2 hole, right? If they are currently in the process of pushing him farther away, I cant imagine they would turn around and bump him up to one of the most important spots in a lineup… Does that seem logical?

And sorry, but the .274/.345/.376/.721 he has posted the past 5 weeks when he wasn’t given a free pass is not exactly living up to expectations. Infact, its not looking that dissimilar to what the team was getting from Jacque Jones… Who knows what the future holds, but so far…

Please...stop with the small sample sizes!

"Who knows what the future holds, but so far…"

Are you kidding? So far???

Fukudome - .305/.407/.422/.830 with a GG calibur right field, and thats not expectations??? He is meeting mine just fine.

Soto - .305/.400/.569/.969

Best rookie in the NL this year so far, his VORP, as Tim pointed out in his chat, is well above Votto.

Does it really matter who hits 5th, and who hits 6th out of those two??? Wouldn't anyone LOVE to have those two hitters as their 5 and 6 hole hitters? Come on, stop with your anti-cubs obsession.

"And sorry, but the .274/.345/.376/.721 he has posted the past 5 weeks when he wasn’t given a free pass is not exactly living up to expectations."

Are you serious?? There are so many dumb things about that statement that I can't even begin to count them. First of all, HIS EXPECTATION WAS THAT HE WOULD WALK A LOT! The best thing about him was his strikezone knowledge. Not only has he proven to have that mastered, he also is taking a TON of pitches on top of that.

Its old Dark, really old.

If you notice Dark they move him down in the order when they are facing a left handed pitcher. Tomorow you will see that he will be back at the 5 spot. And Saturday he will be back at the 6th with a lefty on the mound.

I would move him to #2 because of his OBP and taking a lot of pitches.

Two words, MICAH HOFFPAUIR!

Let us savor the day. The Cubs have the best record in baseball.

“Are you kidding? So far???”

…Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah… Yeah we know youre all Homer over your team; you don’t need to show it every few minutes… However, lets just look at facts:

Fact 1) the thread is about adding a LH power bat.
Fact 2) Fact #1 means Fukudome would be moving to the 2-hole…
Fact 3) Fukudome is in a 5 week downward trend; and is currently moving down in the lineup, not up…
Fact 4) Fact 3 is in spite of the player moving up (Soto) being in a slump himself.

So, looking at 3+4 and taking 2 into account makes 1 unlikely… It has nothing to do with your riding of anyones jock; it doesn’t matter if you think Soto belongs in the HOF or if you think Fukudome will hit 500/600/1.500 or whatever other ‘all Cubs sh!t smells like roses’ spiel you try to force down peoples throats ~ it solely has to do with likely events based off recent trends. Recent trends are Fukudome continues to hit less and less, gets moved farther from 2 hole and is unlikely to shoot up to that spot; making a power-leftie an illogical target…

“If you notice Dark they move him down in the order when they are facing a left handed pitcher. Tomorow you will see that he will be back at the 5 spot. And Saturday he will be back at the 6th with a lefty on the mound.”

…that’s cool, but its still a downward move in the lineup and doesn’t generally indicate a person is preparing to move up… A move down means fewer PA, plain and simple ~ and if you really would like a player to get as many PA as possible, you don’t move him that direction at all…

“I would move him to #2 because of his OBP and taking a lot of pitches.”

…His pitches are something which has also seen a rather dramatic difference from the first 3 weeks to the last 5… It went from 4.68 to 4.01 ~ a difference of easily tops in the bigs over that time, to about 56th…

Fact #1 - Judging by VORP, Geovanny Soto would be the BEST hitter on 18 major league teams right now!!! And you are wondering why they would bat him 5th?? Really?

Fact #2 - Fukudome has a .407 OBP, is KNOWN for his OBP, had a lifetime OBP of .430(!) in Japan, and will continue to do what he has always done.

Fact#3 - If we are going by small sample sizes here, in his last four at bats, Fukudome has a .333/.500 line. I guess he is on an upward "trend"!

"Fact 1) the thread is about adding a LH power bat."

This is the one fact you bring up that is relevant here. Here is another: The Cubs have one of the best offenses in baseball. THEY DON'T NEED ANOTHER BAT! Hell, they probably don't need anything to win this division. However, its not the division they are thinking about this year. In order to go anywhere in the post season, or at least past Arizona, they are going to need to add a #2 or #3 starter to their rotation. Sorry, Maddux is not that.

Which all brings me back to the point I was originally making here...a Burnett type is what they Cubs need, or even Harden. (and pray either are healthy)

What they don't need is to add a bat to one of the most potent lineups in baseball when they already have everything you need offensively.

Fact: A #2 starter is the only real need for this team. The rest are just nice additions.

"…that’s cool, but its still a downward move in the lineup and doesn’t generally indicate a person is preparing to move up… A move down means fewer PA, plain and simple ~ and if you really would like a player to get as many PA as possible, you don’t move him that direction at all…"

Come on, you aren't this dumb dude...

He just explained that they put him 6th when facing lefties! So yes, you don't want a lefty to have as many at bats as possible when Soto is hitting a whopping .354/.475/.688/1.163(!) against lefties.

Hmm...which would you want to hit 5th? This isn't rocket science. Your ignorance of this is baffling...

“Fact #1 - Judging by VORP, Geovanny Soto would be the BEST hitter on 18 major league teams right now!!! And you are wondering why they would bat him 5th?? Really?”

…And who the F* cares what he has done ~ he’s not doing it now… Do you wait till a guy retires to give him a raise? Do you wait till pitchers get shelled to call them up from AAA? Do you wait till a guy breaks his leg to give him the starting SS job? Well, maybe you do…


“Fact #2 - Fukudome has a .407 OBP, is KNOWN for his OBP, had a lifetime OBP of .430(!) in Japan, and will continue to do what he has always done.”

…Again, who the F* cares ~ its dropped almost daily since the start of week 4… But I did want to ask, why did this argument change? I mean, 2 weeks ago you proclaimed him a .322/.419/.466 hitter… 2 Weeks of .260/.362/.300 ball later and now he’s really a .305/.407/.422 guy though?

(BTW, I show him as a career .392 OBP guy in Japan, not .430 ~ and that’s with a .301 BA… US generally means somewhere around a .030 drop in BA, you do the rest of the math…)


“Fact#3 - If we are going by small sample sizes here, in his last four at bats, Fukudome has a .333/.500 line. I guess he is on an upward "trend"!”

Hahaha, ok man ~ yeah 5 straight weeks is nothing, and instead we should think back to his first 3 weeks in the majors, when pitchers didn’t even have a true scouting report on him, to know what type of hitter he really is… Thanks for clueing me into that one, yet again… And next week if his numbers drop another 15-20 points are you still going to be giving that same old tired spiel with whatever that new line is being the ‘real’ line we should believe?


...So anyway, ‘all Cubs players sh!t gold bricks’ ~ I get it man…


…And then another 3 posts of the same old tired crap? Really, whatever dude…

Two words.

Jerome Walton.

lol.

Look all that matters is that they are winning and winning every way imaginable right now.
The thing about stats,ESPECIALLY IN BASEBALL, is that you can manipulate them to lean toward whatever stance you have (as you have all seen Dark do repeatedly). I've never seen a season where any player on any team has been a flatline of consistency, that would please the most anal of statititions.
Players lines go up, they go down. That's baseball.
Some of you sit here and start typing away all smug, shooting down other peoples OPINIONS, like YOU sh!t gold (and shut the windows and door to enjoy the aroma). It is that very arrogance that has you looking like baseball know-nothings. You can hide a vast array of stats amongst ten dollar words(as if they some how emphasize your point) and that doesn't change the fact that the Cubs are playing pretty decent baseball right now. Nor does it change the fact that, yeah, Soto is a pretty good catcher learning a very complicated league and looking rather quite well in doing so. Fuk happens to be doing a nice job in right as well.

Would you rather have Soto or Barrett/Kendall? Fuk or J. Jones/M. Murton?
Bottom line is the Cubs did a nice job upgrading the '07 team that won them a division.
And if you think you can predict who's gonna do what with your random stats, I have two words for you
Detroit Tigers.
"Enjoy the ride or just get off at the next stop. Pointing out the bumps in the road does not make for a smoother ride nor does it keep you from arriving to your destination" -Your Mother

Good post goat.

Listen, I'm not trying to predict the future here, other than I think its safe to say with a line of .305/.407/.422 and GG defense in a very tough to play right field, to say he isn't meeting expectations is ludicrous, and downright stupid.

I may love the Cubs, but I am trying to point out truth here. I'm not saying all Cubs are great...many of them have their flaws. But to talk about the two single biggest improvements from last year's team and act like they aren't a HUGE part in the Cubs having the best record in baseball, well, you make yourself look dumb. Almost as dumb as asking why you would want Soto to be the 5 hitter when he has a 1.163 OPS against them. Come on.

The fact is, the Cubs are winning. They have a terriffic offense who pounded out 8 more runs yesterday. They need a #2 or #3 guy, and anything else is gravy. They have played a TON of home games, so pretty soon here, they are going to have to prove themselves on the road as well.

"Almost as dumb as asking why you would want Soto to be the 5 hitter when he has a 1.163 OPS against them. "

Them meaning lefties...

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment


Top Stories



Search MLBTR

Lijit Search

MLBTR Features



Recent Posts


MLBTR Mailing List

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Rumors By Team



Monthly Archives


Live Chats


Tuesdays at 2 p.m. CST



Site Map     Contact     About     Advertise     Privacy Policy     Widget     Twitter     Rss Feed


MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com.