![]() |
|
|
| |
« Odds and Ends: Street, Zaun, Guardado, Blalock | Main | Everett Remains With Twins »
9:55pm: Jayson Stark attempts to douse the Manny flames, getting denials (again) from the Dodgers and Phillies.
8:39pm: Ken Davidoff says the Teixeira deal makes a Manny trade more difficult, since that's one less option for Boston to replace Ramirez's bat. The Red Sox will keep trying nonetheless.
6:52pm: Jon Heyman says the Phillies might be the frontrunner for Manny. Ramirez will want his $20MM options eliminated upon a trade.
The Dodgers are also involved, with the Marlins surfacing as a longshot.
3:07pm: Ken Rosenthal says the Dodgers are not pursuing Ramirez or Teixeira. So, conflicting reports again. The Dodgers are also not interested in Adam Everett and unlikely to acquire Jack Wilson.
Joe Christensen agrees that Everett isn't happening, and notes that the Dodgers once had Ronny Cedeno on their list.
2:36pm: Joel Sherman of the New York Post has the Dodgers in the lead for Manny. The Red Sox would eat most or all of the $7MM remaining on Ramirez's deal, and then receive a player like Matt Kemp or Andre Ethier. Such a deal would enable the Sox to enter the Mark Teixeira bidding.
Sherman also talked to one NL exec who believes the Dodgers might instead acquire Brian Roberts, pushing Jeff Kent into a utility role and leaving the shortstop problem unresolved.
1:05pm: Looks like Manny's going to need his own post, after all. Earlier today, Dan Graziano said the Mets are still in on Ramirez despite the denials. Now SI.com's Jon Heyman adds that the Dodgers are showing interest. The talks are still in their infancy, and keep in mind that the Dodgers do not want to add payroll.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e200e553de25eb8834
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Manny Ramirez Rumors: Tuesday:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
How about a Manny reunion in Cleveland? Use the money that would have been spent to resign C.C.
Posted by: Pronkfan789 | July 29, 2008 at 01:17 PM
For what it's worth; multiple reports on WEEI in Boston have suggested that the Red Sox would pay the rest of Manny's salary for 08 if they get what they want in return in any deal.
Posted by: Peagle8 | July 29, 2008 at 01:18 PM
I think the Red Sox should oblige Colletti's hatred for young players by sending Manny and the $6M left on his contract this year to the Dodgers for Kemp.
Posted by: DunkinDonuts | July 29, 2008 at 01:33 PM
Ive heard those suggestions on WEEI as well though radio rumors are largely unsubstantiated.
I cant help but think that if Manny doesnt get traded, he'll simply sit out the remainder of the season regardless of the risk of suspension, fines, etc. He does hold the cards on this one. If he doesnt produce for the rest of the year it'll only hurt the Sox. Manny will still get signed by another team regardless of his antics.
Posted by: el clash combo | July 29, 2008 at 01:36 PM
Can't see Kemp going to Boston, but Ethier may be the guy. If you trade Kemp, the Dodgers are left with a Manny/Pierre (or Jones)/Ethier outfield. I'd hate to see what that looks like in a spacious park like Colorado.
Besides, Kemp has turned a corner. He's been on fire since the break, currently leads the team in homeruns, and has a 15-game hitting streak. I like to think he's turned the corner in management's eyes too. Torre seems to like him a lot, as evidenced by the amount of play he gives him, more than any other OF on the team this year.
I don't want to see Ethier go either though. A Manny/Kemp/Pierre OF would have its share of defensive shortcomings as well. (What kind of an arm does Manny have? Who would play right and who would play left?)
Ideally, something can be worked around Pierre and prospects.
Posted by: jumanjifan01 | July 29, 2008 at 01:42 PM
If Manny were to sit out the remainder of the season I'm sure that would only hurt the contract he is hoping to sign elsewhere after this season.
Posted by: Champ | July 29, 2008 at 01:43 PM
hey tim just heard a rumor on espn radio that boston and atlant have talked about swapping manny for teixiera. then atlanta trading manny for prospects. dont know how atlanta would get more for manny then mark, but just what i heard
Posted by: jerseyballer | July 29, 2008 at 01:44 PM
Schoeneweis, Castro, 2 b-level prospects for Manny
Posted by: GaryKeith&Ron | July 29, 2008 at 01:46 PM
If Manny REALLY wanted to be a d**che (if he doesn't get dealt) he would play out the remainder of the season and come up with a mystical injury for the postseason.
Posted by: GaryKeith&Ron | July 29, 2008 at 01:47 PM
Yeah, that will surely get Manny his $100 extension...
Posted by: stephen | July 29, 2008 at 01:52 PM
I've heard the sox would pay the rest of his 08 sallary....I also heard they would only do a deal if that waste of 36 million dollars cf were to be involved...if that's the case...no thank you.
I think a deal could be done but over the last few seasons teams asking prices have gotten out of hand...and in the case of manny he brought it on himself. He's becoming a free agent and teams are bothered for a 2 month of a mental case or possibly a HoF hitter...he wants to be a free agent and teams would get those 2 nice picks in return....the redsox demands are not high...they are jus asking for what exactly your getting back at the end of the year anyway. I don't think they would mind saving their prospects for trades for other needs and just get 2 more come years end when they split. It'd save them in the long run.
If manny doesn't produce and pulls the b/s the rest of the year then he doesn't get that 100 mill deal he is hoping for as peter gammons said.
Posted by: elevenahead | July 29, 2008 at 02:01 PM
No way would even Manny be crazy enough to sit out the rest of the season.
I'd like Kemp going to the Sox hitting sixth behind Lowell (put Drew back in the 3 spot and move Ortiz to cleanup) but I'm wondering what more would they be able to get other than Kemp since the Sox would look for more in return.
Posted by: Peagle8 | July 29, 2008 at 02:01 PM
He wants a new deal somewhere that's not Boston, not an extension.
Posted by: GaryKeith&Ron | July 29, 2008 at 02:05 PM
The Sox like Kemp -- they asked for him for David Wells a couple years back in August.
I think they need someone who can produce right away though.
The Tex/Manny thing doesn't make sense, I agree with who wrote that.
Elevenahead, who's the 36/mil cf you're referring to? Crisp makes way less than that. Drew is actually good now. Ellsbury makes nothing. Lugo's a SS. I don't follow what you're saying. Also, where did you "hear" this? A caller on EEI suggested they attach Lugo to Manny last night, but as Mikey Adams rightly pointed out, attaching an underachieving and hurt 9 million dollar shortstop doesn't exactly increase his value.
Posted by: fatherscott | July 29, 2008 at 02:08 PM
elevenhead:
your logic seems about right, but doesn't the team only get 2 draft picks if the team that picks him up is one of the top 15 in the draft? thus a team like the yankees picking him up would only end up being 1 pick? ...sorry the draft pick compensation is a little confusing
Posted by: GaryKeith&Ron | July 29, 2008 at 02:09 PM
As a Yankee fan, nothing would make me happier then trading Manny. I don't care who they get back.
Posted by: WidespreadPanic | July 29, 2008 at 02:49 PM
"I'd like Kemp going to the Sox hitting sixth behind Lowell (put Drew back in the 3 spot and move Ortiz to cleanup) but I'm wondering what more would they be able to get other than Kemp since the Sox would look for more in return."
How is two months of a disgruntled Manny, who has said he will be a free agent at season's end, worth more than Kemp?
Manny's only advantage is in hitting ability, but it's not by as much as you think. Manny has four more extra-base hits this year in a much better hitter's park.
Manny's speed is laughable compared to Kemp's, who is probably one of the fastest players in the league.
Manny can barely play LF. Kemp is coming together nicely as a CF with a gun for an arm.
Kemp is young and the best days are behind him. Manny is old and his best days are behind him.
I would be so mad if Colletti traded Kemp for two months of Manny. So they say they have a problem with Kemp's attitude, and then talk about trading him for the biggest attitude problem in the game?
By the way, Kemp doesn't have an attitude problem. It's a total fabrication of Bill Plaschke, who is determined to dismantle this team with all the powers he has. Kemp is a hardworker who has adjusted his approach many times already this year at the behest of the coaching staff. He hustles every play, and makes routine grounders to SS very exciting.
Posted by: jumanjifan01 | July 29, 2008 at 02:51 PM
Can't happen, right? Even with Coletti it can't happen. I'd barf.
(Also, fatherscott, I think you mean Wells and not Cone)
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | July 29, 2008 at 02:55 PM
Manny to La for macdonald, elbert, hu and a throw in like jones.
No contracts would have to be eaten and the sox love to take other players who have been good in the past and was having a bad year.(i.e. mike lowell)
Posted by: yankees2727 | July 29, 2008 at 02:58 PM
And what exactly happens if Texiera doesn't land with the Red Sox? What happens if he does?! Who plays OF / 1B / DH?
This is really messed up timing because Matt Holiday would have worked but he's apparently off the trade market according to:
http://www.ingamenow.com/teams/440/1/Colorado_Rockies
Posted by: PopChatter | July 29, 2008 at 02:59 PM
the 36 mil/2 years cf is andruw jones. the initial report was that the dodgers would only trade for manny if jones were headed back to boston
Posted by: Stan2219 | July 29, 2008 at 02:59 PM
I was referring to andrew jones and the waste of a centerfielder.
Now from what they are sayin they'd swap either/kemp and deal for tex. The sox also picking up most of many's tab helps.....the sox wouldn't keep kemp, not long term anyway, I agree that it would be a trade chip for tex and I say yay for that if possible...
Either way if he stays or goes will matter on our relievers getting their act togeather, won't matter who is in left field.
Posted by: elevenahead | July 29, 2008 at 03:07 PM
Does anybody listen to Ken Rosenthal anymore?
Posted by: Bosox4416 | July 29, 2008 at 03:12 PM
Colletti is bound to trade Matt Kemp as a last ditch effort to keep his job. I'd hate to have Manny's bad attitude out in LF along with Pierre's noodle arm, the $18M failure in CF (currently riding the bench), and the fact that management refuses to give Ethier a starting job. We'd so badly miss Kemp.
I do like that Brian Roberts to LA rumor though.
Posted by: la16 | July 29, 2008 at 03:13 PM
If the Dodgers are willing to part with Kemp it Would not surprise me if this actually got done. Yet, even my most optimistic red sox fan side wonders if they really are that stupid. They might be if the Sox take that disgusting contract back. If the Sox took Jones and the Dodgers took lugo things could get interesting. I wonder how the Sox fanbase would react to an ethier and others deal? It is not that crazy if they get a pitcher out of it. Possibly in a secondary deal for Bay or Teixeira. Still seems pretty far fetched but interesting nonetheless.
Posted by: walkoffblast | July 29, 2008 at 03:15 PM
if the sox were to get Kemp for Manny do you think a deal centered around Ellsbury would go Atlanta? The next two days could be very interesting...
Posted by: Kramerica Industries | July 29, 2008 at 03:30 PM
Just clearing up the contract numbers.
The amount of waste isn't 36 million since the deal is only for 2 years and this season is almost over.
Andruw Jones' '08 base pay is 9 million. His signing bonus installment for '08 is 5.1 mil. That totals 14.1 mil.
Andruw's '09 base pay is $15mil + 2.1 mil signing bonus installment which comes up to 17.1 mil for '09.
Then there's another signing bonus payout for 5mil in 2010.
So it's more accurate to say the "waste" is about 25.1 million, not 36 million.
Manny's '08 base pay is 20mil
Posted by: Garrett | July 29, 2008 at 03:47 PM
I can't see the Red Sox even considering taking Ethier back, since he has not shown himself to be anything more than a slightly older version of Brandon Moss.
I don't think the Dodgers should even consider dealing Kemp, but it's not as lopsided as one might think. Two months of a .125 OPS upgrade in the lineup for a team one game out of first place in a terrible division could be significant. Not to mention that Manny is not technically a "rental," since the Dodgers would have little to lose by offering him arbitration at the end of the season and collecting the draft picks when he signs a three-year deal elsewhere.
The more "plugged-in" Dodger fans might be upset to watch Kemp go, but the casual bandwagoners would be excited to acquire a player of Manny's caliber in a pennant race, even if he IS on the wrong side of 35.
Posted by: DunkinDonuts | July 29, 2008 at 03:56 PM
Put me on the record that Kemp for Manny won't happen. Manny's just a rental without much want/hope of having more than just the 2 months.
Might get LaRoche if you catch the L.A. organization on a bad day...but definitely not Kemp.
Posted by: Garrett | July 29, 2008 at 04:05 PM
Ewwwww. Not big on the Manny Bandwagon. If they DID somehow acquire him, there are 3 rooms he must visit at Dodger Stadium before suiting up 1) Trainer's room, for a physical with someone besides Stan Conte 2) The Barber (This is the Dodgers we are talking about) 3) Final room, locked door meeting for 4 hours with Lasorda and maybe Bowa. Gladly grant the request of Mr. Ramierez to not enact the remaining option years (does this not nullify possibility of arbitration?). Finally, and most seriously, don't give up Kemp. I would hate to see Andre go, but he deserves to be an everyday player somewhere. Bottom line, I say forget about Manny, period.
Posted by: abcrazy4dodgers | July 29, 2008 at 04:07 PM
Where could Ethier go where he would be an acceptable starting corner outfielder?
Posted by: DunkinDonuts | July 29, 2008 at 04:20 PM
"How is two months of a disgruntled Manny, who has said he will be a free agent at season's end, worth more than Kemp?
Manny's only advantage is in hitting ability, but it's not by as much as you think. Manny has four more extra-base hits this year in a much better hitter's park."
Right for this year it's not as much, but you also can't really compare the track records of the two players.
And 2 months of Manny (without paying him) AND the 2 draft picks are worth more than Kemp IMO.
Also, I hope if they make that deal they just keep Kemp since Tex is a free agent at the end of the year (and is going to be looking for huge dollars that I'm not sure his production over the last 2 years are worth) also.
Plus where does he play? They would have to move one of two gold glove first baseman to LF...
Posted by: Peagle8 | July 29, 2008 at 04:22 PM
I love dunkin' donuts, but you're wrong when you say Ethier=Moss
Ethier is better than Moss now and comparing them as 24 year olds.
Moss' strikeout rate is still too high to play in the mlb (k/bb~2.6'ish). He'd strike out about 180 times if given a full season's ab's at pawtuckett. His limited mlb ab's show the same propensity--except for even fewer walks :(
Ethier's plate discipline was better at the same age. His power was comparable, and he got on base more.
Moss' contact problems may keep him from ever being a regular.
They are two different levels...even when comparing them at the same age. Ethier was far more polished as a 24yr old than Moss is right now.
I'll get to your what other teams could Ethier start on other than the weak hitting dodgers question in a minute...
Posted by: Garrett | July 29, 2008 at 04:42 PM
places Ethier would start at a corner outfield spot...
arizona,
atlanta,
cleveland
houston
kc
laa (this one surprised me a bit...Ethier>Anderson&GMJr.
lad
mn
a's
pirates post nady trade
sf
sea
tor
and the nats...
that's almost half the league
he is what he is ...an average corner outfielder...
Posted by: Garrett | July 29, 2008 at 05:19 PM
Manny to the cubs ?
then move soriano back to 2nd
Posted by: Scott - Fairview (7even8ightproductions) | July 29, 2008 at 05:33 PM
The Mets could give Neise, Carp and Murphy to the Pirates.
Pirates give Bay to the Red Sox
The Red Sox give Manny to the Mets
Posted by: Mets17 | July 29, 2008 at 05:58 PM
For that you could just take Bay who is cheap next year and comes without the headache. I don't think Neise Canp and Murphy will get you Bay. It will take you another young pitcher like Antonini maybe a young high upside player.
Posted by: metsfan | July 29, 2008 at 06:41 PM
Now that tex is moved u can call off the la and sox talks
Posted by: elevenahead | July 29, 2008 at 06:43 PM
the sox would NEVER trade to the angels elevenahead, never. there the best team in the al, why make them better?
Posted by: 04Forever | July 29, 2008 at 06:59 PM
the phils make so much sense its sickening to me. the can throw together a good enough deal and they win the division again, the sox are going to be in trouble either way, but atleast the future is brighter i guess
Posted by: 04Forever | July 29, 2008 at 07:04 PM
Unless u can find another 3rd team but pitts, mets, rox, phils, dbacks aren't likely at this point it seems. I still don't see how the phils are the front runner unless a third team is involved....and now the marlins??? I can't wait to see all the hanley for manny posts now(cuz it won't happen kids)
As I said before, get the picks and either make a run at bay or sign holliday and let manny walk and get 80 million somewhere if he is lucky and produces at all or he'll prob sign for lower with many clauses and incentives thrown him due to his attitude which is many what the sox shoulda done back in 05 or 06 to keep him on a short leash and to force him not to pull these b/s temper tantrums.
Cross your fingers for a bullpen arm in the next 2 days...mayb 2 and we could move one...say craig hansen who isn't papelbon jr which they have been waiting for since wha 04'?
And if worse came to worse....I'd rather see moss/coco/youk rotate that spot and play their heart out than jaguar gymnastics and ninja moves in the outfield and have to question every single @ bat on wheather manny is tryin or not.
One question thou....how can one play knowingly play like that and guys like buck weaver not get reinstated?
Posted by: elevenahead | July 29, 2008 at 07:10 PM
04ever....the dodgers....not angels....keep up. Now that text has been delt...the dodger talks will subside b/c their trade would have moved to atl for tex. Unless of course another 3rd team is involved say pitts and they somehow pull off the pipedream deal for bay. They don't want kemp like numbers in lf they want to use that as a trading chip.
Posted by: elevenahead | July 29, 2008 at 07:20 PM
Hey the dbacks were gona try and use tracy in a trade for tex...why not a 3 way w/ pitts bos and the dbacks
Dbacks get manny and cash
Sox get bay, grabow, and wilson
Pirates get tracy, lowrie, moss/or another prospect of choice and/or another dbacks guy.
Posted by: elevenahead | July 29, 2008 at 07:26 PM
"If you trade Kemp, the Dodgers are left with a Manny/Pierre (or Jones)/Ethier outfield. I'd hate to see what that looks like in a spacious park like Colorado."
Manny and Ethier can both throw. I think Torre would have to at least consider putting Ethier in center with that outfield.
"I'll get to your what other teams could Ethier start on other than the weak hitting dodgers question in a minute..."
Ethier is above average defensively and he has shown the ability at an above average level as well. I think the roster uncertainty, lineup issues and inconsistent playing time have depressed his numbers some.
Posted by: AA | July 29, 2008 at 08:10 PM
How about Cards trade Ryan Ludwick, Bryan Anderson, and PTBNL for Manny and Cash?
Bat Manny after Albert. Wow
Posted by: Redbirdfan | July 29, 2008 at 08:59 PM
redbird, thats a good idea. but do you really want manny that bad? i mean really though
Posted by: 661folife | July 29, 2008 at 09:04 PM
has anyone heard about a deal Kotsay for Pettit
Posted by: 5953Smith | July 29, 2008 at 09:25 PM
yankees are not trading pettite you dope
Posted by: Jreyes7 | July 29, 2008 at 09:44 PM
not pettite! Pettit (SP) from D'Backs
Posted by: 5953Smith | July 29, 2008 at 09:49 PM
Manny to the twins !! (never going to happen but would be cool) twins will give up Mike Cuddiar, Chris Parmalee, Alexander Soto, and a pitcher. . Think about it, it works they get a right feilder for now, and for the future, a stong catching prospect ,and some pitching for there Minors. . I Think this is about as likely as Favre goin to the vikes, It works but the twins spending money for a rent a player wont happen
Posted by: Bray991 | July 29, 2008 at 10:02 PM
What about Manny to the Phillies for Burrell and possibly that prospect catcher they have in Philly?
Posted by: red33sox24 | July 29, 2008 at 11:17 PM
Would I like Manny, Yes. Would he work in Cardinal Nation..No.
Plus St. Louis would never paid the money for him.
But everyone was throwing out trades for there team. I wanted to fit in...ha
Posted by: Redbirdfan | July 29, 2008 at 11:40 PM
Me, along with the rest of the Yankee fans would be so surprised/relieved/happy if the Red Sox actually went through with this... Too bad they're not trading him since with out him, they don't make the playoffs this year because of the huge whole in their would be lineup.
Posted by: Arod188 | July 29, 2008 at 11:55 PM
elevenahead ~ The D'Backs do not want Manny. Even if he is free. There are links stating this on the front page of the site. Plus, he would probably be a bad influence on our young guys.
5953Smith ~ Petit is not going anywhere. He is sliding into Owings spot in the rotation now that he has been sent down.
Posted by: seanprh | July 29, 2008 at 11:56 PM
To tell you the truth, Cardinals wouldent be bad!! at all, they have the prospects to give up and the OF to fit in right now !!give up Ludwick, Bryan Anderson, and prolly someone like fernando salas. . I think the sox will want a LF for now, and tomarrow and at least one good prospect!
Posted by: Bray991 | July 29, 2008 at 11:56 PM
BAD INFLUENCE ON THE BABY BACKS?!?!?!???? Say what you want about Manny's quarkiness but this guy is the hardest worker in the league, he would be a great help for those young raw DBacks. No one on the Red Sox works harder and because of that guys like Dustin and Youk work harder too, there is no negative influence... you dont see Ellsbury making phone calls in the Green Monster, none of Manny's package is cancerous because no one wants to immatate anything but his hitting.
Posted by: magic8ball | July 30, 2008 at 12:52 AM
Jason Marquis and Mike Fontenot for Manny! Manny can replace Theriot at shortstop. Get it done Jim!
Posted by: nrmax88 | July 30, 2008 at 01:13 AM
Brian Roberts on MLBTR! Drink!
Seriously though, this is an interesting side note to the story. I wonder what the Dodgers would offer for BRob. They've got the system to get something done and, with Colletti fighting for his job...who knows? It's a perfect situation for McPhail to exploit (no offense, Dodgers fans). Doubt it goes down, but interesting to think about- Roberts and Sherrill for...? McDonald, Lambo, LaRoche, Morris, and Elbert? I honestly don't know, but the idea is absolutely intriguing. Just hope McPhail doesn't blow it by holding out for Kershaw or something.
Posted by: milehigh78 | July 30, 2008 at 01:17 PM
Seanprh....
I'm aware they are not interested....I'm throwing ideas of who could be used hense pitts bein in there when they are also not in talks with either team, its called brainstorming and throwin and idea out there like most in this blog do....okie dokie chief.
Posted by: elevenahead | July 30, 2008 at 01:41 PM
Seanprh....
I'm aware they are not interested....I'm throwing ideas of who could be used hense pitts bein in there when they are also not in talks with either team, its called brainstorming and throwin and idea out there like most in this blog do....okie dokie chief.
Posted by: elevenahead | July 30, 2008 at 01:41 PM