![]() |
|
|
| |
« Cameron Not Likely For Yankees | Main | Four Teams Eyeing Chad Cordero »
According to Troy E. Renck of the Denver Post, the Phillies and Cardinals are the top suitors for Rockies outfielder Matt Holliday.
The Phillies discussed Holliday and Brian Fuentes with the Rockies during the season. The Rockies have an eye on Carlos Carrasco, J.A. Happ, and Shane Victorino. Todd Zolecki believes Jayson Werth could be in the mix.
The Cardinals have been aggressive, and Ryan Ludwick is their bargaining chip. Joe Strauss says the Cardinals would like to try to sign Holliday to an extension, but may not have the leverage to require a window. The Cards would like to get something done soon. Ludwick alone seems a pretty solid return for Holliday, since the Rockies would have him for three years. Strauss adds that the Mets are also in the running for Holliday.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e2010535e0c621970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Phils, Cards Battle For Holliday:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
I think the Phillies have the edge here. Thats a great return in my opinion. Ludwick is 30 and has one good season. Would they demand Colby Rasmus?
Posted by: Stegs | November 07, 2008 at 09:27 AM
As a Phillies fan, no Vic, no Carrasco, no Marson for one year of Holliday
Which, from Rockies perspective, means no deal. At least until the trade deadline, maybe
Posted by: wayne gomes | November 07, 2008 at 09:31 AM
As a phillies phan.. it'd be dumb to get rid of the heart on the team.
Victorino is clearly the heart, and him and Werth should stay put.
Carrasco can be dealt, but I'd rather dish away Kendrick then Happ.
Posted by: cben | November 07, 2008 at 09:35 AM
if im a Phillies fan im not sure id want to give up that pachage without a window for an extension. With Boras as Hollidays agent, I doubt that will happen.
How sick would Pujols and Holliday look as a 3-4.. WOW
Posted by: curse_ended | November 07, 2008 at 09:36 AM
I seem to remember reading comments coming from the rockies that they were looking for a package of younger projectable guys rather than guys with MLB service time. Ludwick really doesn't make alot of sense in that scenario...
Posted by: SkiBolton | November 07, 2008 at 09:38 AM
As a cards fan, I can not tell you how much I dislike this deal
Posted by: RickyVaughn | November 07, 2008 at 09:40 AM
Would Ludwick, Jess Todd and Bryan Anderson get it done? If so, wow, how good would a middle line up of Pujols, Holliday, Ankiel and Glaus look? Best middle lineup in the NL, and yes that includes better than the cubs'.
Posted by: forlife61 | November 07, 2008 at 09:41 AM
As good as Ludwick was last season the Cards should not hesitate to trade him for Holliday. Him and Pujols would make a great middle of the order. Then they could bring in Renteria to play short or Hudson at 2nd to help the weak middle infield. I think Wainwright is a stud and will become an ace. If Carpenter can recover from surgery and give them some innings I think this team can contend next year. Also they should look at Juan Cruz as a possibible signing to help them in the closer spot.
Posted by: dwright3b05 | November 07, 2008 at 09:41 AM
As a phils fan I would love to see victorino stay... and I read somewhere that the cards will accept less... so i say happ werth and donald for holiday and we then extend him..
1. rollins
2.victorino
3.utley
4.holiday
5. howard
6. jenkins/ dobbs
7.feliz
8. Ruiz
Posted by: adam44is | November 07, 2008 at 09:46 AM
I'd hesitate to trade Jess Todd more than I'd hesitate to trade Ludwick. Who else do the Cardinals have in terms of big pitching prospects (not including Jaime Garcia who's out with TJ surgery and Chris Perez, who should be handed the closer's job for 2009).
And, if Luddy is in the package, it should be Luddy for Holliday straight up.
"Carrasco can be dealt, but I'd rather dish away Kendrick then Happ."
Happ is worth more than Kendrick. A lot of Kendrick's first half "success" this year was indeed smoke and mirrors.
Posted by: melonis rex | November 07, 2008 at 09:49 AM
Utley, Howard and Holliday would be chopped liver I suppose.
A Phillies trade should be contingent on the knowledge of being able and willing to sign him long term. Either they get him and really do just want him for one year, which would be silly considering the core of this team is still getting better. Or they don't think they have a chance in heck of being able to sign Howard long term because of his massive price tag and want to have someone on the team who they can. Having Holliday with a look to trading Howard down the line wouldn't be a bad plan.
Posted by: kssj4 | November 07, 2008 at 09:51 AM
for one, pujols-holliday-ankiel-glaus.. is not better than rollins-utley-holliday-howard.. so you wont have the best in the NL. sorries.
and for 'melonis rex'
I realize that Kendrick isn't good, hence why I would like to deal him. Happ actually has "stuff", while Kendrick does not.
Posted by: cben | November 07, 2008 at 09:57 AM
Still, this deal wouldn't be worth it for one season.
And Scott Boras is a prick.
Posted by: cben | November 07, 2008 at 09:58 AM
Victorino in a Holliday deal makes zero sense for the Phillies.
Who plays center field? Are the Phillies going to call up the Giants and get Rowand back?(they'd be happy to oblige). Are they going to go out and sign Mark Kotsay to play CF?
You are getting above average offense from the CF position. And, Victorino plays above average defense in CF. Why downgrade at CF so you can upgrade at LF? Finding a decent hitting LF is easier than finding a decent hitting CF.
And, the Rockies will definitely ask for more, because Victorino's offense isn't that good from a corner OF spot, which is where he will be playing in Colorado.
Posted by: melonis rex | November 07, 2008 at 10:00 AM
Would Pujols and a Coors-less Holliday really outproduce Pujols and Ludwick from last season though?
Ludwick could be scary good in that thin air of Denver. I think the Cardinals have quite more pressing issues than to swing three years of Ludwick for one of Holliday and have to fork out more cash to get him to stay.
Posted by: CubbyFan23 | November 07, 2008 at 10:03 AM
"And, the Rockies will definitely ask for more, because Victorino's offense isn't that good from a corner OF spot, which is where he will be playing in Colorado."
I doubt he would play a corner in Colorado. He would play center with Ryan Spilborghs would playing left and Brad Hawpe playing right.
If the Phillies offer anything like that, the Rockies would be wise to jump on it. I'm not so sure about Ludwick. He has little chance of repeating his performance from last year.
Posted by: mkorpal | November 07, 2008 at 10:12 AM
Doesn't it make far more sense for the Phillies to just resign Burrell than trade Werth and their top pitching prospect for Holliday?
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | November 07, 2008 at 10:17 AM
I think Holliday may help the Cardinals. Ludwick had a career year, so there's no way to tell if he'll top that off, but playing in Colorado, he could hit a lot of dingers. I'm not sure how Holliday would hit in St. Louis.
Posted by: kevinj | November 07, 2008 at 10:23 AM
David DeJesus might be available from Kansas City. Trading Victorino isn't the end of the world. DeJesus is still young and is very cheap. I'd think a Jason Donald and an Edgar Garcia type would do it.
Posted by: CSL | November 07, 2008 at 10:25 AM
mkorpal-
When Dexter Fowler is ready, wouldn't Vic move to LF (or, preferably, move Hawpe to LF and Vic to RF)?
I would probably take Victorino over Luddy though if I were the Rox, since I'm not really confident of his repeating his 2008 performance.
Posted by: melonis rex | November 07, 2008 at 10:28 AM
"When Dexter Fowler is ready, wouldn't Vic move to LF (or, preferably, move Hawpe to LF and Vic to RF)?"
I was just talking about that with a buddy. I'm thinking that one of them would be traded when Fowler is eventually ready. But Vic is today what the Rockies hope Fowler will be in 3 years.
Posted by: mkorpal | November 07, 2008 at 10:34 AM
If anything, the Cardinals need to be shopping that extra OF for pitching. The rotation is abysmal. This trade seems to be just moving laterally and spending more money to me for the Redbirds. Why not dangle Ludwick or Ankiel for a top half of the rotation starter?
Posted by: CubbyFan23 | November 07, 2008 at 10:35 AM
VICTORINO will not be part of the deal the phillies have came out and said he wont be traded period.
Posted by: derman1984 | November 07, 2008 at 10:53 AM
"David DeJesus might be available from Kansas City. Trading Victorino isn't the end of the world. DeJesus is still young and is very cheap. I'd think a Jason Donald and an Edgar Garcia type would do it."
Except, trading Victorino + prospects for Holliday, then turning around and trading more prospects for DeJesus seems just inefficient.
It might cost a bit more to get DDJ, due to his contract status.
"VICTORINO will not be part of the deal the phillies have came out and said he wont be traded period."
Where has this been stated? Link?
Posted by: melonis rex | November 07, 2008 at 10:56 AM
Abysmal cubbyfan? Hardly. Even without Carpenter, we're solid 1-3, with Pineiro as another option. We'd just need to go hunt down another starter, like maybe Looper.
If Carp is healthy, we have a REALLY good rotation.
Posted by: SoonerfanTU | November 07, 2008 at 11:03 AM
victorino better not be involved in any deal...that is ridiculous. unless that is they want to send him to boston for jacoby....
;p
Posted by: elevenahead | November 07, 2008 at 11:05 AM
I'm not sure why the Rockies need a OF in return.
Wouldn't Spilbourghs play LF?
If Taveras is shipped too, I'd figure they'd play Spilly in CF, and maybe move Stewart to LF.
If Holliday, Taveras and Atkins get moved, you leave Stewart at 3rd, Spilly at center and Seth Smith at LF.
I just don't see a need at OF.
Posted by: ProgMatinee | November 07, 2008 at 11:07 AM
"I'm not sure why the Rockies need a OF in return."
Agreed, to an extent. The Rox should go for pitching first, but if a deal can't get done, center it around an outfielder with probably a pitcher in the deal as well.
An ideal Holliday deal from the Phillies would have one or both of Carrasco or Happ in it, along with other piece(s).
Posted by: melonis rex | November 07, 2008 at 11:17 AM
This is all about giving Burrell added pressure to take a 2 year offer that's on the table right?
As nice as it would be to have Holliday split the order between Utley and Howard, no Phillies fan will approve of it coming at the expense of Victorino. And losing Werth would be no easy thing to stomach either. This is for one year and then Holliday hits the open market.
I trust Amaro will use his head and doesn't offer anything more than some package of Werth, Happ, Donald. If the Rox want Carraso, they have to take either Eaton's or Jenkins contract.
Posted by: PhilsPhan | November 07, 2008 at 11:33 AM
Burrell ain't taking a 2 year offer.
And, the Phillies aren't getting Holliday for Werth, Happ, and Donald b/c Werth is a 1 year rental, Tulo is locked up long term, and Happ isn't that awesome of a pitching prospect/pitcher.
Posted by: melonis rex | November 07, 2008 at 11:50 AM
I'd go as far as Werth and Happ. Werth is in the last year of his deal as well.
If they are interested in Donald (not sure they would be unless he's at 2nd, they have Tulo), they rejigger it with Donald and a lesser pitching prospect, like Naylor. I wouldn't give both Donald and Werth
I can't justify trading away 3 years of my centerfielder, 6 years of Carrasco, or six years of Marson for a Holliday rental
Posted by: wayne gomes | November 07, 2008 at 11:52 AM
And I pretty much agree with what melonis said above me from the Rockies' perspective. That's why I see a Holliday deal as a pipe dream
I expect the Phils to check on on Magglio, Dye, Ludwick though. Maybe there's a better match at a lesser prospect cost
Posted by: wayne gomes | November 07, 2008 at 11:58 AM
Matty just needs to come to grips and realize that Denver is a great place to be for the next 4-5 years. Take the Rox shorter term offer.
/dreamer
Posted by: ProgMatinee | November 07, 2008 at 12:01 PM
Don't trade Victorino Ruben for a 1 year rental...I want the Phils to pull off the Holliday trade but do not include Victorino...Make an offer of J.A. Happ,Kyle Kendrick,Greg Golson,and throw in some other prospect and the Rockies will eventually take it because their not getting alot for a guy who's a 1 year rentral...Look at what the Braves got in return for Teixiera and what the Mets gave up for Johan (even though they've signed him long term).
Posted by: JT89 | November 07, 2008 at 12:10 PM
Ludwick is eligible for arbitration after next season....just something to keep in mind
Posted by: bigrob3737 | November 07, 2008 at 01:00 PM
Honestly, if the Phils can get away with trading Werth instead of Victorino then that would be great. But I am against this deal. Why trade for Holliday now when you know that you can resign him? I don't think the Phillies payroll has enough in 2010 for Howard at $15-$19mil and Holliday at close to the same price. But in 2010 we get rid of Jenkins, Feliz, and Eaton's salaries. Maybe that works in our favor? But back to Holliday. If the Phils can get away with Werth, Carassco, and Kendrick without trading Marson or Donalds, I would be happy.
Posted by: dan51390 | November 07, 2008 at 03:22 PM
CubbyFan has it right. No way I'd do this deal if I'm the Cards. Ludwick is outright more impressive than 1 year of Holliday.
Posted by: Zoop | November 07, 2008 at 03:37 PM
Phils won't trade Victorino and Werth for Holliday (both Werth and Victorino are starters in our OF) and Fuentes (our bullpen is pretty decent with Lidge, Romero, and we'll soon wrap things up with Madson after his arbitration)It doesn't seem likely to me. This same trade seemed exciting in July, but we didn't pull the trigger and I don't see why we would now that we've proven we can win a WS.
Posted by: Phinally08 | November 07, 2008 at 03:57 PM
Rosenthal said the proposed trade by the Cardinals was Ludwick, Schumaker and Boggs for Holliday....I don't know if the Cards should make this trade...
Posted by: Cardsfan387 | November 08, 2008 at 12:41 AM
Oops, forgot the link...
http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/8770300/Value-of-Holliday,-Atkins-questioned
Posted by: Cardsfan387 | November 08, 2008 at 12:55 AM
If that is what STL is really offering, Phils can't beat that without starting with Vic and adding a quality prospect or two....I'd like to see Amaro bow out if that's the case
Move on to Dye/Magglio
Posted by: wayne gomes | November 08, 2008 at 11:08 AM