![]() |
|
|
| |
« Orioles, Reds, Tigers, Jays Interested In Greene | Main | Matt Holliday Rumors: Thursday »
5:06pm: More on the Cameron situation: Ken Davidoff says Cabrera and Ian Kennedy have been discussed. However, the Brewers will probably wait to see if they can sign Sabathia, since he's good friends with Cameron.
10:26am: The latest Yankees hot stove buzz...
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e2010535de37ef970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Yankees Rumors: Cameron, Melky, Pettitte, Lowe:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
I can't imagine that Cameron rumor being true. Melky is a clear downgrade in just about every way to Cameron.
Posted by: kgbaseball | November 06, 2008 at 10:34 AM
Ollie Perez in Pinstripes
I'm all for it
Posted by: Kenan and Kel | November 06, 2008 at 10:37 AM
Tim,
How about Melky Cabrera,Robinson Cano, and Ian Kennedy for
Mike Cameron, Rickie Weeks and/or Tony Gwynn Jr.?
Posted by: Lidocaine | November 06, 2008 at 10:40 AM
"I can't imagine that Cameron rumor being true. Melky is a clear downgrade in just about every way to Cameron."
I'd imagine he'd be about a $9.5m upgrade in terms of salary.
Posted by: Scottsdale01 | November 06, 2008 at 10:43 AM
Lidocaine,
For that type of a package I would expect the yankees to pursue an established ML pitcher. Also, that adds quite a bit of salary to the Brewers.
Posted by: Scottsdale01 | November 06, 2008 at 10:45 AM
That is why the Yanks would be including more players.
Posted by: DominicanYanks | November 06, 2008 at 10:45 AM
Cameron would be a good patch / platoon for CF until AJax is ready. Melky is dead weight. However, giving up Betemit, Melky, and a pitcher for Cameron is too much.
NO LOWE, BRIAN!
+ Can we officially declare a moratorium on Cano trade speculation? While he might bring back something we need, trading him would fly in the face of the strategy laid out last year and, worse yet, alienate numerous fans.
Posted by: rossdfarian | November 06, 2008 at 10:47 AM
I don't get this deal. Why would we trade away 23 year old that still has potential for a 35 year old who costs $10 m? I've never been a fan of Cameron, sure he can field, but he is a impatient hitter that tends to bat low. Play Gardner or Melky in center and wait for Jackson. Rossdfarian, Lowe is a good pitcher, if we can get him on a 2 year deal it's a good move, because that means that by the time McAllister, Betances, and other pitchers may be ready, there will be at least 1 opening. Finally Cash, PLEASSSSSSE TRADE BETEMIT, he is among the worst players I have ever seen, I'm glad we gave up an innings eating reliever for such an atrociously bad player.
Posted by: yankman27 | November 06, 2008 at 10:52 AM
"I can't imagine that Cameron rumor being true. Melky is a clear downgrade in just about every way to Cameron"
I think you have that backwards! Melky is 12 years younger, has already led the AL in assists, is a switch hitter, hit for the same average as Cameron and strikes out less than half as much. Besides that Melky has potential, whereas Cameron is on a downswing...and Cameron makes over 10 MILL while Melky is making 400K. Only thing Cameron can do better than Melky right now is pop a few more homers. NO THANKS! I'd rather see Gardner out there and use the money towards Tex or pitching.
Posted by: jjyankeesfan2 | November 06, 2008 at 10:56 AM
yankman name three utility players that offer more roster flexibility than betemit.
Posted by: Casanova Wong | November 06, 2008 at 11:00 AM
I think it would be a good trade, also the one someone propsed wasn't to bad. For the yanks the money doesn't matter and bottom line they improve. The brewers get a capable player who can improve and and they need some pitching propects for there upper levels.
Posted by: jay87shot | November 06, 2008 at 11:08 AM
Yanksman & JJ..I agree entirely.
Melky still has plenty of potential, package him for a pitcher..fine, but for a 35 year old free swinging OF..no way.
I STILL say Gardner should get a shot.
Posted by: yankeegirl49 | November 06, 2008 at 11:13 AM
What would the Yankees do without Cabrera, Betemit, and Kennedy?
2008 OPS: Betemit - 718 / Cabrera - 642 / Cameron - 808
2008 ERA: Kennedy - 8.17
Cabrera/Betemit are AAAA players. OK guys to have on a club in case of injuries but in no way should they be starters. Meanwhile, Cameron had a great year last year. Which followed 2 very solid years the previous seasons. Cameron is a major league starter - top 15 in his position. He would be a huge upgrade over what is currently being fielded.
As for Kennedy - you either believe that he is has upside or you don't. In my case the guy projects to be a 5th starter at best. Not a lot of value for me. However, if you believe he is a solid #3 type starter I can see your hesitation when it comes to moving the guy.
Posted by: bjsguess | November 06, 2008 at 11:17 AM
How does Melky or Gardner have plenty of potential?
Career minor league OPS:
Cabrera - 769
Gardner - 774
If either player lived up to their MINOR league track record you would still have a bottom 5 CF'er.
Posted by: bjsguess | November 06, 2008 at 11:20 AM
One of gardners most redeeming qualities is that he walks at a very good rate (70 BB @ SWB). Unfortunately that doesnt carry over and pay immediate dividends in mlb.In the minors ups knew him as a very discriminate hitter so all the close calls that are just off the plate he would get. Now in mlb, all umps see is some rookie punk and the close calls go the other way. He has historically been a slow starter in each level of play and this is probably why. The kid hit .296 with an obp of .414, you put a guy with his speed on first and you'll get burt (37 steals in 96 games at SWB and 16 for 16 in his short stint with the yanks.
Posted by: Casanova Wong | November 06, 2008 at 11:25 AM
Oh and i love how people look at kennedy's stats from those whole 12 games he played @ mlb level and declare hes a bust. He's 24 yrs old with 12 games of experience and a history of dominating in college and all levels of the minors, but no seriously, hes a bust.
Posted by: Casanova Wong | November 06, 2008 at 11:28 AM
i was wrong abt gardners steals in mlb he was 13/14.
Posted by: Casanova Wong | November 06, 2008 at 11:30 AM
yeah cameron had a great year
G AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO SB CS AVG OBP SLG OPS
Season 120 444 69 108 25 2 25 70 54 142 17 5 .243 .331 .477 .809
wow thats impressive... 240 with 25 homeruns whatta beast..
melky provides similar defense with less pop and a similar batting average
and costs 9 million less
cameron is just a name
Posted by: hawkeyes12990 | November 06, 2008 at 11:45 AM
"Melky and Kennedy are the equivalent of signing Gabe Kapler and Paul Byrd! Junk!"
Much like every single thing you post here.
Posted by: yankeegirl49 | November 06, 2008 at 12:10 PM
"I think you have that backwards! Melky is 12 years younger, has already led the AL in assists, is a switch hitter, hit for the same average as Cameron and strikes out less than half as much."
I don't think I've ever seen a poorer use of statistics. Wow.
Posted by: scribbletone | November 06, 2008 at 12:16 PM
Cameron got caught stealing 2.5 times more than Melky last year!!!
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | November 06, 2008 at 12:31 PM
rsd enjoy your commenting privileges while you still have em
Posted by: Casanova Wong | November 06, 2008 at 12:45 PM
I'd like to think Mike Cameron can grab someone better than Melky Cabrera. Why would the Yankees even try to trade him when his value is rock bottom? Maybe they've completely given up on Milky.
Posted by: SierraM | November 06, 2008 at 02:43 PM
"yankman name three utility players that offer more roster flexibility than betemit."
Hmmmm, that's a tough one. How about just about every other utility player in the game. Let me name a few, Ty Wigginton, Willy Bloomquist, and Chone Figgins. Betemit can't really play that many positions, and he surely can't play any of them well. Additionally as a utility player, fielding ability should be the most important aspect. I want the Yankees to go after a guy like Cesar Izturis for a utility guy. All Betemit offers is sporadic power. I want a guy that can offer good fielding, speed, a decent hitting and on base ability, and the occasional pop. Betemit is a useless player, I don't know who would take him.
Posted by: yankman27 | November 06, 2008 at 02:47 PM
Ransom would also make a better full-time utlity guy than Betemit.
Posted by: rossdfarian | November 06, 2008 at 03:06 PM
mike cameron......? are they serious with this junk.....please give me a break this guy is no good.....i would rather see them try out guys all throughout the first half then be stuck with cameron....try out austin jackson....try out gardener....let melk get a little time.....but god no cameron is a bum.....i also agree with the guy above me ransom make a much better utility guy the betemit...dump him hes another bumm
Posted by: TheBigNewYorkeR | November 06, 2008 at 03:31 PM
if you really want to get into stats here they are to compare melky to cameron
via points system on major categories in fielding and hitting
melky: 129 games despite being sent down
cameron: 120 (suspended for steroids)
cameron has melky on homeruns, doubles triples, RBIs, walks, steals, On base percentage and slugging in hitting
we all know cameron is the better hitter here, melky only has him on is batting average .243 to .249, and melky also strikes out a hellof a lot less
Melky actually has a better fielding percentage than cameron all over the outfield in his career, although cameron made only one error this year to melkys four
melky had more assists and a better range factor, while cameron has the better zone rating
cameron might be better NOW
but melky is eleven years younger
so if the yanks attitude is a warm body in center field waiting for austin jackson, then melky for cameron is an ok deal, but trading potential for an older veteran who can outhit him is not smart
id rather try gardner who is a better fielder, walks more, and is faster than either of them, although he has no power
Posted by: hawkeyes12990 | November 06, 2008 at 04:23 PM
(Walks more in the minor leagues. Big difference.)
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | November 06, 2008 at 04:35 PM
perhaps he does, but he will not strike out 149 times in 120 games- i can guaruntee you that
Posted by: hawkeyes12990 | November 06, 2008 at 04:50 PM
When will people wake up and realize that it is 2008.
Posted by: nrmax88 | November 06, 2008 at 05:25 PM
I can't even believe we are arguing this.
Win Shares - takes into account offense and defense.
Cameron = 19 / Cabrera = 5
rough translation = Cameron contributed more than 6 wins compared to Melky's less than 2.
Or you can look at VORP (by BP). No defense here but VORP does take into consideration the defensive position you play when considering your offensive production.
Cameron = 22.3 / Melky = -4.0
In this case, Melky performed WORSE than a replacement level player. This shouldn't be a surprise as most people outside the Bronx realize he is a AAAA type player.
The only thing that Melky is better at that than Cameron is striking out less. As has been discussed over, and over, and over again that is one of the most useless statistics ever.
Melky is a warm body who can play decent defense and is cheap. He should not be starting at CF for any big league club - especially one that has a payroll north of $200m.
Posted by: bjsguess | November 06, 2008 at 06:04 PM
mike cameron is still a damn good ball player. i think he would be a great fit in the 8 or 9 hole the yankees. there would be no pressure, well i guess depending on who they gave up for him. but he would be playing for a ring, and i think he would pour his heart onto the field for 2 years
Posted by: 661dodgerblue | November 06, 2008 at 06:20 PM
Ok...I was going to make an arguement on the stupidity of giving up on a 24 year old CF who last year many thought had good potential and is now looked at as garbage based off of a bad year but I dont even want to waste my breath. Any Yankee fan who wants to trade him for a 36 year old player on decline can not be reasoned with. I just hope Cash doesn't pull the trigger.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | November 06, 2008 at 06:23 PM
Will people please stop with the batting average and k-rate garbage?
Grab a clue people.
Cameron would likely require Kennedy+.
As a Brewer fan, I would be OK with that, not thrilled.
The problem here is that the Brewers have no one to man CF (hence the Cameron signing to begin with). A deal with the Yankees would require another deal to shore up CF.
Melky is similar to Gwynn (aka useless).
Yes, yes I know Melky is likely the better player, but he's still junk.
I can't envision a scenario where the Yankees acquire Cameron without Kennedy being involved.
Posted by: brewtown | November 06, 2008 at 06:24 PM
I don't want Melky(sucks, hits into tons of DP's), Cameron(rally killer who constantly k's), Gardner (can't hit) or Betemit (the worst player I have seen in a Yankee uniform in 30 years). I want Damon in center, Manny, Matt or Hideki in left, Nady in right, Posada, Manny or Hideki at DH, Posada or Molina catching, Teixeira at first and leave the rest as is. With CC, Wang, Pettitte, Joba and Lowe or Burnett guaranteed #27 W.S.
Posted by: yanksrule | November 06, 2008 at 06:28 PM
bjsguess:
What arguement are you having?
Cameron's 08 numbers vs Melky's 08 numbers?
or
Cameron's future production vs
Melky's potential production?
My stance is that while Cameron might be a better player today he has plenty of potential to be much better next year or the year after. Not saying he will ever be a All-Star but I can see him being a .280 15 hr 75 rbi player with some speed who plays a good CF/LF position. Couple that with the fact that he's making $400k compared to Cameron's 10 million plus the other players you would have to give up I don't see a big improvement.
At some point you have to say is it worth trying to improve at a certain position based upon what you have to give up. Law of diminshing return.
If Melky is a 7 on a scale of 1 to 10 and Cameron is a 9 is it worth the upgrade? Other than power what does he provide over Melky? Homeruns? Is that what a team like the Yankees need? If so then get it from a 1B or a DH like Man-NY. Do it big time.
Trading for Caf they pickedmeron is no more than a fantasy league move that pads your team stats. If Cameron was a 1B and there were no better FA options then maybe I'd pick him up as a FA. Do you realize that if we traded for Cameron our team would look like this:
1B- ???
2B- 26
SS- 35
3B- 34
C- 37
LF- 36
CF- 36
RF- 30
DH- 35
How do we complain about our team being so old this year and then make a move that makes the team much older and halts the developement of a rookie like Gardner? How does this make sense? Why can't we carry one freakin' weak bat in our line up? The arguement I hear against Melky and Gardner is that they can't hit? Never have I heard an arguement saying that either had a weak glove. This is so stupid. Address the more pressing needs and leave CF alone for now. And if a young pitcher is added as a throw in then that would make us look even more foolish.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | November 06, 2008 at 06:39 PM
Pardon some of the typos...
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | November 06, 2008 at 06:41 PM
Damon in CF? How many runs is THAT gonna cost us? My grandmother throws better than Damon..and shes dead!
Manny or Matsui in LF in addidtion to that? Guess you don't put too much importance on defense cause that is one horrible defensive OF.
Posted by: yankeegirl49 | November 06, 2008 at 06:47 PM
Wow...did someone say that batting avg and strike outs are meaningless stats?
Is that why we're still giving out batting title awards? lol. You can make an arguement about a player like Ichiro or Pierre who are mostly singles hitters and how their hits are "powerless" but BAVG still measures hits vs at bats.
And strikeouts are nothing. So a player who comes to bat and whiffs 150 x means nothing? A strikeout is probably the absolute worst thing a hitter can do. He offers nothing to a team. Yes, it might be better than hitting into a double play but at least a player who can put the ball on the ground where he wants to or can hit it deep has the ability to move a player from one base to another thus making his out productive.
You people are crazy. You have a few new formulas and stats and you think you can disregard all the other ones? All stats have use and all stats have some validity to them. Stop "cherry picking" which stats are good and which ones aren't. Use them all but use them with a grain of intelligence.
I'm not knocking Cameron as a player but he does two things well. Plays good defense and can give you 20 homeruns. But he'll also strike out a lot and hit for a very low avg. Any pitcher worth his salt can get this guy out. please stop making out as the next Willie Mays.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | November 06, 2008 at 06:51 PM
Not Joe Morgan:
(Walks more in the minor leagues. Big difference.)
ARGGGGGG!!!!!!!
Where else is Gardner going to do it? he's only had 127 mln at bats!!!! Give him a chance to see what he can do.
Making an assumption that Gardner will be a horrible hitter based upon his 127 at bats makes as much since as someone saying that Phil Coke is the next Johan Santana based upon the success he had in his 14.2 mlb innings pitched.
Now how about we all chilax and see what the kid can do over a full season? if he's not cutting it after 250 at bats then we make a move. let's keep in mind that he's not going to be our #4 hitter. But if he lives up to his scouting report maybe he'll be a solid .280 hitter who can steal 50-60 bases and have a decent obo like .350 -.360. He's done it his entire career. Chances are he may do it in the majors.
How many times have we seen the Yankees give up on young players just to see them become stars elsewhere?
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | November 06, 2008 at 07:00 PM
"I don't think I've ever seen a poorer use of statistics. Wow"
Maybe you need to spend less time being a stat geek like half the nit wits that come on here and actually understand the game.
Posted by: jjyankeesfan2 | November 06, 2008 at 07:00 PM
Cameron and his .240 BA, horrid OBP and 130+ k's per year at age 36 is NOT worth nearly 10 million more than Melky or Gardner. Period. I don't care what numbers you stat nerds throw out there. The money needs to be spent elsewhere - like pitching and first base.
Posted by: jjyankeesfan2 | November 06, 2008 at 07:04 PM
Wow.
I can feel my brain leaking out of my ear.
Thanks YanksFan.
Posted by: brewtown | November 06, 2008 at 07:05 PM
brew - I don't have anything against him per se. The money just needs to be spent elsewhere right now for one. For years the Yankees MO was to sign aging stars on the deline for silly money. That needs to stop. As we all saw in the WS, there is something to be said for youth and enthusiasm.
Posted by: jjyankeesfan2 | November 06, 2008 at 07:09 PM
Batting average and K rate are important huh?
I would post a link for a team total that correlates BA to runs scored, as well as K rate to runs scored, but I don't think you'd care.
Needless to say, teams that K a lot score a lot of runs, as do teams that walk a lot, leading to a high OBP and not necessarily a high batting avg.
It's not rocket science.
Posted by: brewtown | November 06, 2008 at 07:11 PM
I agree. I'm not saying the Yankees need to get him or whatever, but he is a valuable player.
His average sucks, but average is a fairly irrelevant stat.
His K/rate sucks, but strikeouts are basically irrelevant.
I'm happy to keep him. I certainly don't want Cabrera and Betemit for him.
Those are my only points.
Posted by: brewtown | November 06, 2008 at 07:13 PM
No, I wouldn't. High OBP guys and guys that at least put the ball in play provide more productive outs, more runners and have a chance to be driven in. Thus the reason perrenial top teams like the Yankees and Red Sox value players like that so highly. THAT's not rocket science.
Posted by: jjyankeesfan2 | November 06, 2008 at 07:15 PM
Yankeegirl,
I love you because you are a Yankee fan but Damon in center and leading off puts not only his bat in the lineup but either a Matsui, Holliday or Manny instead of Melky or Gardner. Yes, Damon throws like my 6 year old daughter and would cost the Yanks 20+ runs a season because of this, but his leading off and having Matsui DHing, Posada behind the plate and the Yanks getting either Holliday or Ramirez to play left would bring 70+ runs more a season. That's +50 or more and with a Teixeira, CC and/or Burnett/Lowe we are talking #27.
Posted by: yanksrule | November 06, 2008 at 07:16 PM
I think there's a happy medium in between the use of sabermatic stats and baseball common sense. Cameron is a slight improvement on the CF situation but not a drastic improvement. That being the case you have to measure what your being asked to give up:
a) A serviceable 24 year old OF in Melky
b) Young prospects including at least one pitcher (Maybe Kennedy).
c) A salary increase at that position of $9.6 million.
It's not worth it. It helps you for 1 year but come winter of '09 your faced with even more questions.
-Do you go with Cameron another year if Ajax isn't ready?
-Can Cameron produce at age 37 again?
-How do you replace Damon and Matsui.
-Do you resign Nady?
-Can Gardner play everyday in the majors (which you can't really answer if he's relegated to being a 4th OF. In fact he would probably be better served being sent back to the minors.
-Who's going to be our lead off hitter in 2010?
Meanwhile, our team finished 8 games out of 1st NOT because of who was or was not playing CF but because we were an old, unathletic team, with poor infield defense and NO PICTHING. We were also a base to base team that couldn't create runs and had to depend on the long ball. When are we going to change the thinking people?
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | November 06, 2008 at 07:16 PM
Damon is NOT the answer in CF.
Have a good night all.
Posted by: jjyankeesfan2 | November 06, 2008 at 07:17 PM
Couple of things:
If the Brewers are looking to upgrade at center, do not understand why they are not looking at Crisp instead of Melky. Crisp will give proven speed and a glove instead of potential that has yet to succeed, though it will still leave then with the 10mil that Cameron has as doubt Boston wants the headache that he would bring to any club house.
Why not keep kennedy also and try to use him in some kind of package (along with melky) towards a trade with Texas for one of the 3 catchers that they have also? Like Yanksfan78 posted above (and has on several occasions in the past) Give Gardner a chance and then make a play for another vet besides Cameron, he is nothing special besides a 10 mil glove.
Posted by: johns | November 06, 2008 at 07:17 PM
Defensively where were the Yanks weakest last year?
CF
LF
RF
Abreu in RF and to a lesser extent Damon in LF. CF was not a problem. Cameron will NOT solve your greates OF problems.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | November 06, 2008 at 07:20 PM
Too All:
The Yanks OBP + Slug. has gone down dramatically and they are now losing both Giambi and Abreu there #2 & #3 OBP guys. Cameron low OBP, Gardner low Slug., Cabrera & Betemit No OBP or Slug., Damon high OBP and decent CF Slug.%. Now, Manny, Matsui, Posada, Teixeira, A-Rod, Nady, and Holliday high OBP & slug.%. Jeter high OBP and Cano work in progress.
And you don't realize that the 88+ million coming off payroll right before first season in new stadium was all planned. They can afford to go over 250 million and will this off season, free agents won't be able to say no to these dollar amounts. Watch with a smile Yankee fans. #27 is coming.
Posted by: yanksrule | November 06, 2008 at 07:33 PM
Most Strikeouts By Team
Florida Marlins #1
Diamondbacks #2
Padres #3
Oakland #4
Rays #5
Runs Scored By Team
Marlins #14
Diamondbacks #20
Oakland #27
Padres #30
Rays #13
Batting Avg By Team
Marlins #24
Diamondbacks #26
Padres #28
Oakland #30
Tampa Bay #21
Seems to me that with a slight exception to the Rays most teams that strikeout a lot and have the lowest batting avg seem to score the fewest runs.
...........you were saying?
Other interesting stat.
Yanks ranked 20th in walks
Yanks ranked 7th in Batting Avg
Yanks ranked 6th in OBP.
Yanks ranked 10th in runs scored.
Still think there's no corelation between batting avg, obp and runs scored? The more hits, the more times you reach base and the more opportunities to score runs and drive in runs. It's NOT rocket science.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | November 06, 2008 at 07:39 PM
Too all:
Yanks lost lots of OPS last year and now Giambi and Abreu, #2 & #3 are gone. That is why Damon with an extremely high OPS for a center fielder is good and more than makes up for his arm and range. Plus, the Yanks signing Manny or Teixeira and maybe trading for Holliday makes total sense, all high OPS. The 88+ million coming off payroll right before first season in new stadium was a brilliant strategy. The Yanks are not only going to floor these free agents with huge dollars but by far the best baseball stadium in the world brand new. They would be idiots not to want to play there in 2009. They all want to wear pinstripes deep down inside. Watch 110 - 52 in 2009. #27 is coming.
Posted by: yanksrule | November 06, 2008 at 07:47 PM
Yanks rule..
I see NOTHING wrong with..
Damon LF
Jeter SS
Tex 1B
Arod 3B
Posada C
Matsui DH
Nady RF
Cano 2B
Gardner CF
As myself and Yankfan78 have been saying, when you have 1-8 like that, it doesnt really matter if #9 hits .250 when #9 brings good defense, speed and even youth. With CC and another starter, that should still bring 27. If it doesnt, we have MUCH bigger issues than Gardner batting 9th.
As for Manny..don't want him, no how no way. He is one of the best hitters I have ever seen, but I dont want a guy that may or may not give 100%. I have said this 100x before..if after everything he did for the Sox, the fans didnt want him, his team mates didn't want him and the front office didn't want him..I certainly don't.
Oh and I love you too...LOL
Posted by: yankeegirl49 | November 06, 2008 at 07:53 PM
Yankeegirl49,
I like I like more
Damon Damon
Jeter Jeter
Teixeira Ramirez
ARod Teixeira
Posada ARod
Matsui Matsui
Nady Nady
Cano Posada
Gardner Cano
XOXOXO#27 Yanksrule
Posted by: yanksrule | November 06, 2008 at 08:08 PM
Ramirez grew up blocks from Yankee Stadium & always wanted to be a Yankee. He thrives in Yankee stadium.
Posted by: yanksrule | November 06, 2008 at 08:12 PM
Manny will thrive anywhere..anywhere he feels like it.
He is the opposite of everything that Yankee tradition embodies.
If he becomes a Yank I will root for him to do well because I root for the uniform before I root for the players that wear it. I will never own a single thing that says "Ramirez" and I spend thousands on Yankee stuff.
There are 3 guys that have played for the yanks that I have hated passionately, he would bypass every one of them on that list.
Posted by: yankeegirl49 | November 06, 2008 at 08:26 PM
Ramirez grew up blocks from Yankee Stadium & always wanted to be a Yankee. He thrives in Yankee stadium.
didnt know he wanted to be a yankee.
Posted by: 661dodgerblue | November 06, 2008 at 08:29 PM
I agree that there are 2 or 3 things the Yanks should look to improve before they thought of obtaining Man-NY but I posted this thought a few weeks ago about how coming to NY might be different than him going to any other city:
-He grew up in the Bronx and probably still has family there.
-There's a huge Dominican community in the Bronx and New York in general (especially in comparison to Boston). Would Man-NY be ashamed to act the way he did in the past and would pride keep him in line?
-Ny is 10x more diverse than Boston would he feel more comfortable?
-Would playing w/ other huge players like Arod and Jeter take some pressure off of him?
-He seemed to relish the idea of being a major reason why Boston won their 1st ring in 80 years. Would he like the chane to bring #27 to the Yanks and the 1st to the new stadium?
-The Yanks can afford to give him what he really wants. 4 years at $25-$30 per. If he has the contract he wants w/ guaranteed money then what is there for him to be unhappy about? The only time he slacked off was when the question of his options being picked up came. At the end of his deal he'd be 40 and probably not in a position or temperment to ask for another deal.
-He's entering the twilight of his career. Will he try to exist on a good note going out being known as a great player, who was often misunderstood? Would he use this chance to set the record straight and show he's a good "person"? If he put up his numbers and avoided all the drama and thrived under the NY spotlight he could write his own tickt to cooperstown and make 10's of millions in endorsements in NY. Something he never did in Boston. He could retire as a New York icon.
These are things he could never do outside of New York (maybe LA). COuld NY be a difference maker?
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | November 06, 2008 at 08:42 PM
My god, you'd think Melky was projected to be the next Bonds with the way people are acting. All of this talk about living up to his potential? Was his potential ever really more then that of "maybe he'll be an average starter"?
The Yankees aren't in a rebuilding mode, they have no need for a guy like Melky. If they can acquire a veteran bat who's a PROVEN commodity and not just a huge "maybe he'll pan out" like Melky is, you do it. They don't have time to wait around for Melky's possible potential to blossom into a so-so player.
Cameron, as pointed out before, gives your team more wins then Melky would.
I mean, it's not like Melky's worthless or anything, he does have value, but for the love of God stop overvalueing this guy and acting as though he could net you anything of much value in return.
Posted by: Colin | November 06, 2008 at 11:16 PM
MIKE CAMERON IS NO GOOD FOR THE YANKEES WE DONT NEED ANOTHER GUY WHO STRIKES OUT 150 TIMES A YEAR IN A LINEUP WITH A-ROD&CANO THE THREE OF THEM WILL MAKE UP FOR 400 STRIKEOUTS THEMSELFS........AND FURTHERMORE IF LOWE IS ON THIS TEAM I WILL THROW MY TV OUT THE WINDOW....HE IS A TYPE A BUMM.........PITCHING IN THE NL WEST IS A TOTALY DIFFERNT ANIMAL THEN PITCHING IN THE AL EAST .....THATS ALL I HAVE TO SAY ABOUT THAT
Posted by: TheBigNewYorkeR | November 07, 2008 at 02:16 AM
Except Lowe has had success in the AL East.
Posted by: yankeegirl49 | November 07, 2008 at 06:05 AM
Wouldn't Jim Edmonds be a cheaper version of Cameron? platoon him and Melky or Gardner. I can't see him getting more than $2 million - 4 max. He has lost a step but I think he suits yankees needs better and is cheaper
Posted by: touchmymonkey | November 07, 2008 at 06:24 AM
Dumb rumor. The Yankees dot want Cameron but I wouldnt be suprised. If they want a centerfielder so bad the yankees should sign Kotsay. He plays center and first, problem solved.
Posted by: yankfan1 | November 07, 2008 at 06:33 AM
MIKE CAMERON IS NO GOOD FOR THE YANKEES WE DONT NEED ANOTHER GUY WHO STRIKES OUT 150 TIMES A YEAR IN A LINEUP WITH A-ROD&CANO THE THREE OF THEM WILL MAKE UP FOR 400 STRIKEOUTS THEMSELFS........AND FURTHERMORE IF LOWE IS ON THIS TEAM I WILL THROW MY TV OUT THE WINDOW....HE IS A TYPE A BUMM.........PITCHING IN THE NL WEST IS A TOTALY DIFFERNT ANIMAL THEN PITCHING IN THE AL EAST .....THATS ALL I HAVE TO SAY ABOUT THAT
Lowe has pitched in the AL east before and can handle the pressure.
dont get your point with arod and cano..combined they strike out less than cameron would in a full season.. you mad?
Posted by: hawkeyes12990 | November 07, 2008 at 06:53 AM
Really people i think manny or holladay willl be the best upgrade in of and in pitching i still dream about having tim lincecum in the team that will be a good idea or we could still sing c.c
wath do you think people having tim lincecum in the yankees
Posted by: johann | November 07, 2008 at 08:21 AM
Colin:
The arguement is not "Is Melky better than Cameron". He's not. Not today maybe not tomorrow. The arguement I'm making is, Cameron isn't THAT much better than Melky that we should even consider trading Melky, Kennedy and paying $10 million to get him. And by all accounts that's what the Brews would require. Think about this. If Cameron is so great and Melky sucks so bad, why would the Brewers, who want to contend again next year, trade him for Melky and Kennedy if they felt it would not make their team better? Keep in mind that it's not a salary dump for the Brewers. They picked up Cameron's option with the express purpose of trading him for something more useful. Take that into consideration. When a team with a great eye for young talent that has drafted and developed so many great young players want your young players/prospecs for their established star what does that tell you? People wake up and smell the coffee. No one has said Melky will be the next Willie Mays, but the kid along with Gardner and Kennedy have talent that may not have been reached as of yet. And I've NEVER, EVER heard any "expert" say the reason why the Yanks failed to win this year was because of a lack of production in CF. Let's not pull a Bush/Cheyney and throw resources at the wrong "situation".
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | November 07, 2008 at 09:32 AM
Derek Lowe was a good pitcher in the AL east???? He had a era of 4.47 in '03 and 5.42 in his last year in '04!! The last time he pitched in the AL was 4 years ago. You can not sign a guy who's now 35 going on 36 to a 3 or 4 year deal just because he performs well in the playoffs. If he comes back to the AL and gets hammered again there may be no playoffs. You can get the same production that you get from Lowe from Mussina or Pettite for a lot less money and a lot less of a committment. Arggh!!! Where do people get this stuff?
People look at his post season stats and you tell me whether he's worth paying 35-40 million for 3 years based primarily on "he pitches well in the post-season"?
http://mlb.mlb.com/stats/individual_player_postseason.jsp?c_id=la&playerID=117955&statType=2
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | November 07, 2008 at 09:42 AM
YanksFan:
I'm sorry I must've misread the article/someone's comments, I was under the impression that the trade idea being thrown around was Melky straight up for Cameron, didn't realize it would require more then that. If it was those two straight up though, you gotta agree that'd be a good move for the Yankees right now. They aren't worried about 2 or 3 years from now when/if Melky blossoms, they're concerned with winning now.
Posted by: Colin | November 07, 2008 at 02:25 PM