![]() |
|
|
| |
« Odds And Ends: Reds, LaRoche, Francoeur | Main | Heyman: Ten Teams That Could Add Payroll »
We know that the Braves and Rays almost acquired Jason Bay from the Pirates at last year's trade deadline. Rob Bradford of WEEI.com has some specifics on who the Pirates would have received in return and just how close the Braves came to completing the deal:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
god i love bay, im glad he came to the sox. he gave a very nice rejuvenating feel to the club after he got their. i hope he signs an extension and stays
Posted by: 04Forever | June 22, 2009 at 12:27 PM
Who cares about what almost happened? I ALMOST won the lottery once, but it didn't happen, so who cares? Besides, it's really old news now. It would have been something to think about two days after the trade took place, but not now.
Posted by: XCal1bur | June 22, 2009 at 12:29 PM
It's cool to think about, though. Where would the Sox be without Bay, given Ortiz' struggles? Where would the Braves be?? Maybe Garrett Anderson plays in Boston this year...
Posted by: daslied | June 22, 2009 at 12:31 PM
wow that sucks for braves fans
Posted by: johan is GOD | June 22, 2009 at 12:31 PM
"The Braves would have sent Concepcion Rodriguez, Brent Lillibridge, Brandon Jones and Jeff Locke to the Pirates."
Instead, they went with the Boston route, and landed a package of Andy LaRoche, Brandon Moss, Craig Hansen and Bryan Morris.
Can we PLEASE all agree that the Pirates aren't that dumb now, because if they were, then they would have made the above deal with Atlanta?
The Pirates managed to trade Bay, McLouth, Nady and Marte, essentially their previous core, and in return they landed LaRoche, Moss, Hansen, Tabata, Karstens, Ohlendorf, Morris, McCutchen, Hernandez, Locke and Morton.
Not an awful haul, in my opinion, even if the only guys with any star potential there are probably LaRoche, Tabata, Hernandez, Morirs and Locke.
Things are looking up in Pittsburgh, I think.
Posted by: scribbletone | June 22, 2009 at 12:35 PM
Wasn't Bay on the Rays for an hour?
Posted by: icedrake523 | June 22, 2009 at 12:37 PM
The Dodgers gave up more for Casey Blake than the Pirates got for Jason Bay.
Posted by: PWHjort | June 22, 2009 at 12:57 PM
God, stop torturing us with what could have been
Posted by: GoldenGlove002 | June 22, 2009 at 01:05 PM
"The Dodgers gave up more for Casey Blake than the Pirates got for Jason Bay."
The Dodgers may have given up more for Blake than the Brewers did for Sabathia.
The fact that the Dodgers were willing to include Santana in the offer in exchange for salary relief is INSANE.
Santana is the best prospect to change hands in any deal last year (he's better than LaPorta, he's a catcher), and the fact that he was dealt for Casey Blake just makes it a joke.
Posted by: scribbletone | June 22, 2009 at 01:17 PM
Good for the Indians with that Blake trade, I say. The Dodgers bug me.
Posted by: www.homehalfway.net | June 22, 2009 at 01:37 PM
"The fact that the Dodgers were willing to include Santana in the offer in exchange for salary relief is INSANE."
And they didn’t even stop there. The Dodgers also sent Meloan at the low-point of his value because of their failed attempt to make him a starter. Remove last year because of that experiment, and he has impressive lines in the minors himself. May not become a star, but enough to make him a co-centerpiece type player in a trade for someone like Blake.
That is one of the truly stupid moves over the last few years. Santana and Meloan (with maybe a throw in) should have brought a true superstar name, not a comparable to DeRosa or Lopez.
Posted by: SuzysMan | June 22, 2009 at 01:48 PM
Most of us on Dodger message boards were really upset by the Blake/Santana deal. Blake's exceptional performance as a Dodger thus far has made it a bit easier to accept, but I'm sure we'll be haunted by the deal soon enough...
Ned could've dealt Lucas May (another catcher with power potential but much less upside) instead of Santana, but he decided to be cheap.
Posted by: dodgersdan | June 22, 2009 at 01:55 PM
Wow, that trade would have been awful for the Pirates. It's not as if the other deal was that much better, but at least Andy LaRoche has looked very good this year. He looks like he'll be a steady contributor but not a star unless the power comes around. Moss is streaky, Morris could be good once he gets over his arm troubles, and I could care less about Hansen.
When the trade was going down, I was praying Pittsburgh would work out a deal with Tampa. I think it would have helped both of those teams greatly and the Rays may very well be in first place if they had Bay. I wanted Niemann to come to the Pirates badly, but now he won't be going anywhere.
Posted by: bigpat | June 22, 2009 at 02:08 PM
SCRIBBLETONE,
With regard to your 12:35, you are certainly correct that Pittsburgh made out very well in those deals, but McCutchen wasn't part of any of those trades. He was drafted by Pittsburgh and brought up thru the Pirates system.
Posted by: Belliard's 'roid Provider | June 22, 2009 at 02:20 PM
Daniel McCutchen, not Andrew.
Posted by: ToddSm66 | June 22, 2009 at 02:39 PM
midtown - if the braves deserve scorn for how they've treated Maddux, Glavine, and Smoltz, how is that any different that how the Packers treated Brett Favre? yet the Packers get no scorn on the issue.
the clubs, in every sport, seem exempt from a lot of criticism regardless of how good or bad they are.
Posted by: wiscobrew | June 22, 2009 at 02:51 PM
"The Braves deserve all the scorn and criticism in the world, not just for all the stupid deals they've made the last few years, but also for the way they treated Maddux, Glavine and Smoltz."
Maddux left on his own, Smoltz left on his own, because the BoSox offered more money, and it was about time that someone made Glavine realize his career is over. Glavine left on his own 5+ years ago to go join the Mets. So, in other words, Braves didn't do not one thing wrong, except sign Anderson and Kawakami.
Posted by: BravesRed | June 22, 2009 at 02:51 PM
"With regard to your 12:35, you are certainly correct that Pittsburgh made out very well in those deals, but McCutchen wasn't part of any of those trades. He was drafted by Pittsburgh and brought up thru the Pirates system."
You're thinking of the wrong McCutchen.
The Pirates received RHP Daniel McCutchen from the Yankees in the Nady/Marte deal.
"That is one of the truly stupid moves over the last few years. Santana and Meloan (with maybe a throw in) should have brought a true superstar name, not a comparable to DeRosa or Lopez."
Totally agree with this. If the Dodgers FO had decided that they were willing to deal both Santana and Meloan in the same deal, I can't imagine that Blake is the best they could do.
You make a lot of good points with Meloan as well. His numbers were excellent all through the minors, and even his 4.15 FIP as a starter in AAA really wasn't that bad.
They sold low on Meloan and Santana in order to save like $3M. That's disguisting, and I'm borderline offended.
Posted by: scribbletone | June 22, 2009 at 02:54 PM
Manny was almost a Marlin, and Hermida was almost a Red Sox.
Posted by: Barroid_Bonds | June 22, 2009 at 02:58 PM
I think the Manny to Marlins deal was something like Bay to the Red Sox and Hermida and Mike Stanton to Pittsburgh.
Posted by: Ian Smell | June 22, 2009 at 03:09 PM
Jesus Christ. Thanks for ruining my day Ben Nicholson-Smith.
IF ONLY we had Jason bay.
Posted by: bravesfansc | June 22, 2009 at 03:28 PM
"I think the Manny to Marlins deal was something like Bay to the Red Sox and Hermida and Mike Stanton to Pittsburgh."
If the Marlins made that deal, then it would've killed their franchise.
Manny would've walked after the season, and Marlin fans would've cried.
Hermida is still a solid corner outfielder that's under control cheaply for a couple years, and Mike Stanton is emerging as arguably the best prospect left in the minors.
Stanton and Hermida for a couple months of Manny would've gone down with the Pierzynski/Colon/Teixeira trades.
Posted by: scribbletone | June 22, 2009 at 03:33 PM
Shouldnt one of the players in the Teixeira trade turn out to be an all star before you put it in a class with those other deals?
To date not a single one of those guys would have started for the Braves at any position
Posted by: Crown_royal_34 | June 22, 2009 at 04:11 PM
so by your logic midtown we should have kept 3 40 year old pitchers that would have maybe won as many games as they lost collectively? Should we have kept Andruw Jones too? Andruw Jones who was playing AA offense and AAA+ defense for the Dodgers. Boy how we could have used that .196 batting average I mean since we're alienating people.
That being said: Bring Back Andruw
Posted by: Bring Back Andruw | June 22, 2009 at 06:36 PM
My mistake on not realizing that there are two McCutchens in the Pittsburgh system. I thought maybe they could be brothers with such an uncommon name, but, judging by pictures, i'm pretty sure they're not related. Unless their parents are Brad Pitt/Angelina Jolie wannabes.
Posted by: Belliard's 'roid Provider | June 22, 2009 at 07:07 PM
That was a pretty poor package the Braves offered for Bay. Wasn't he a free agent this year though? How much did the Red Sox sign him for? It's pretty doubtful the Braves could have signed him longterm...
Posted by: drphonic7 | June 22, 2009 at 07:15 PM
MIDTOWN UR A HATER U SUCK!!!!
GO BRAVES
Posted by: Braves #1 fan | June 22, 2009 at 08:39 PM
THANKS CROWN ROYAL 34 FOR WHAT REALLY IS
Posted by: Braves #1 fan | June 22, 2009 at 08:39 PM
IMAGINE OUR TEAM WITH BAY WE MIGHT BE IN FIRST PLACE
Posted by: Braves #1 fan | June 22, 2009 at 08:40 PM
We'd still have a huge hole in center. Maybe we don't let go of Josh Anderson...who knows...who cares.
Posted by: BraveNewWorld | June 22, 2009 at 08:55 PM
scribbletone, marlins fans, however many there may be, are always crying irregardless of what manny may have done.
Posted by: christian | June 22, 2009 at 10:35 PM
Yes. This was another Frank Wren wannabe deal. I want Peavy, I want A.J., I want Adam D., I want Ken Griffey, I want Furcal. Frank has a credibility problem. He can't evaluate talent so he just goes after the newest hot commodity, Leaks the fact that he is pursuing them , squeals foul when they gosomewhere else & thinks he looks good while doing all this.
Posted by: billreef | June 23, 2009 at 12:43 AM
oh how I love the what if game, but here's a couple.
WHAT IF the Burkett trade with Boston/Florida never happened. Handley Ramirez would currently be playing short stop for Boston....interesting.
WHAT IF that Braves had signed Peavy?? Better yet what if they had signed Furcal and moved Kelly Johnson to Left, talk about a stuggling offense.
Point being....I don't know it's late and I'm rambling but sometimes the biggest trades are the one's you DON'T make. Because as a Braves fan I like having McClouth for 3 years more than having Jason Bay for a little over year.
Goodnight MLBTR, and stay classy ;)
Posted by: snoot titanic | June 23, 2009 at 05:05 AM
First,if Liberty Media did'nt want to spend money to support this franchise why did they purchase it?
The front office in the past year has made decisions that leave something to be desired.
I think the game has passed mmr. Cox by. I never concidered him the greatest thing in managing. Back in 91 in the world series when he brought in Liebrant to face Puckett left me wondering. All those division wins came by way of Smoltz, Glavin and Maddox. Any Manager could have had success with that trio.
Frenchy, should never had been tendered.
K. Johnson is timmid. His problem is a lack of agressivness and he has a serious problem with lefiies
when Infane is healthy he would be my starting 2B.
T.Pendelton may have been a good hitter in his day but as a coach he has'ny shown me much. This club needs a new direction.
Posted by: brave4/30 | June 23, 2009 at 06:15 AM
Ok, does anybody agree with me that the Tex trade to the Angels has been probably the worse trade the Braves has done in franchise history. The braves got in return Casey Kotchman. He is a top 15 firstbaseman in MLB, but Tex is the best firstbaseman if not the best MLB around. Also, they got Stephen Marek who is a 26 year old relief pitcher that has never made a debut higher thatn AA. Did the Braves get ripped off or what. The traded Tex for Kotchman straight up, and freed up a little bit of money.
Posted by: BrentWt34 | June 23, 2009 at 08:39 AM
First,if Liberty Media did'nt want to spend money to support this franchise why did they purchase it?
There's this thing in the business world, it's called profit
Posted by: bravesfan22193 | June 23, 2009 at 01:18 PM
Brent you're an idiot, it was .5 a season of Texeira for 3.5 seasons of kotchman. Then you factor in the money difference and it's hardly getting ripped off
Posted by: bravesfan22193 | June 23, 2009 at 01:19 PM
Yes. This was another Frank Wren wannabe deal. I want Peavy, I want A.J., I want Adam D., I want Ken Griffey, I want Furcal. Frank has a credibility problem. He can't evaluate talent so he just goes after the newest hot commodity, Leaks the fact that he is pursuing them , squeals foul when they gosomewhere else & thinks he looks good while doing all this.
Posted by: billreef | June 23, 2009 at 12:43 AM
Frank Wren wannabee deal? The deal was actually agreed upon by both sides until the pitt owner intervened (clearly stated above) so fail to see the logic there. Also do you really think wren just calls up the media and says well i really like so and so and we're really close to signing him. News flash every team has information leaks and they come from lower level guys 99% of the time not the GM. Can't evaluate talent? Name one trade he has made where he's come out as the loser (excluding the mclouth trade because it's too soon to judge) and remember he didn't make the first Texeira deal
Posted by: bravesfan22193 | June 23, 2009 at 01:28 PM
Why does'nt Time/Warner still have it?
Posted by: brave4/30 | June 23, 2009 at 05:08 PM
Who gives a damn? Like if the brave's had him he would probably be playing average like Texeira did when we traded to get him. He is the same type of player. Also we would only have had him to this trade deadline and would have had to deal him cause there is no way we could resign him.
Posted by: JPWBRAVESFAN | June 24, 2009 at 12:07 AM
brave4/30
do you even follow baseball?
First off you say ANY coach could have won with Maddux, Smoltz, Glavine. I hardly doubt that. Sure there are some coaches out there who would have had just as good success with the guys, or even better. But there are a ton of coaches who would have pushed to guys too hard or not enough and wouldn't have gotten near the results.
right players+right manager= winning season. Substitute wrong players or wrong mangers and you wont have the same result.
Secondly, Liberty didn't so much buy the team as Ted Turner sold/traded it to him. Liberty owned a lot of Time Warner (Ted Turner's company) and had the aquired slightly more stock from somewhere Liberty would have been full owners of Time Warner, so basically Ted traded the team for stock in his own company and there was cash considerations too. Stickily business but that's how it is.
Thirdly Kelly Johnson doesn't have problems against lefties, in fact I think he is batter close to .300 vs. lefties.
And Finally (deep breath)
I don't think you can put the hitting problems on Terry P. The team was 6th in runs last year and they have had a pretty solid offense since he took over, so it's not ALL him.
Posted by: snoot titanic | June 24, 2009 at 01:22 AM
sorry for all the type-o's ladies and gentlemen. I typed that really fast and didn't proofread.
Goodnight MLBTR, and stay classy.
Posted by: snoot titanic | June 24, 2009 at 01:24 AM
ya i heard that story and man my favorite team is the Boston Red Sox but I live in Atlanta so it's hard to say good stuff about that because who knows if he did come to Atlanta we might be leading the division, or we would be above .500. Were doing good now only 4 games back but if we would have gotten Bay that would have been a big boost. Who knows maybe in the off-season Garret Anderson will become a free agent and I know Jason Bay's contract is done at the end of the season and we could sign him if the Red Sox don't. Another thing the Red Sox are interested in Jeff Francoeur so who knows the Red Sox may be buyers at the deadline? But I'll tell you iff we trade Francouer it's gonna be for either J.D Drew or Jason Bay. That's sad the Braves already had his name sewn into a jersey...
Posted by: ReD SoX | June 25, 2009 at 11:56 AM