![]() |
|
|
| |
« Heyman Talks Giants | Main | Reds Back Off Rolen Deal »
3:09: Ed Price confirms that the Dodgers acquired Sherrill. Rosenthal and Morosi do, too. Bell is a well-regarded 22 year-old power prospect, though Baseball America is unsure whether he can stick at third base. BA projects Johnson as "a big league reliever or back-end starter."
2:44pm: MLB.com's Ken Gurnick reports that the Dodgers acquired George Sherrill for Josh Bell and righty Steve Johnson.
2:40pm: Yahoo's Gordon Edes says the Orioles are "on the verge of trading Sherrill to the Dodgers for Scott Elbert and Josh Bell." Sherrill, 32, is under team control through 2011. He has a 2.40 ERA with 20 saves in 41.3 innings this year. Fantasy leaguers, time to pick up Jim Johnson.
2:03pm: Ed Price of AOL Fanhouse (via Twitter) has a source saying Sherrill's a Dodger, but he is working to confirm the info. ESPN's Jayson Stark's source says there's no agreement, however. The Dodgers are making a push for him this afternoon, but there are at least eight interested clubs.
Stark adds that the Dodgers want two relievers, with Toronto's Jason Frasor on the radar.
THURSDAY, 11:43am: Morosi and Rosenthal say the Dodgers are pursuing both Sherrill and Roy Halladay. They may only be able to acquire one, since some of the same prospects are being discussed in each case. The writers say the O's prefer Josh Bell to Blake DeWitt for Sherrill. Baseball America loves Bell's raw power but wonders if he'll be able to stick at third base.
WEDNESDAY, 7:10pm: Morosi and Rosenthal say that you can count the White Sox in as a team interested in Sherrill, though it's unclear if the teams have made contact. It's speculated that Josh Fields might go to the Orioles in a deal, as they're looking for help at third base pending the departure of Melvin Mora.
2:44pm: As many as eight teams are pursuing George Sherrill, according to Ken Rosenthal and Jon Paul Morosi of FOX Sports. Two or three of the teams are actively engaging the O's in trade talks.
The Angels are interested, as are the Dodgers, whose prospects appeal to Baltimore. Joel Sherman of the New York Post hears that the Dodgers are focused on trading for Sherrill now that Cliff Lee's off the market.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
Wont matter. Without an Ace the Dodgers aren't getting out of the first round sadly.
Posted by: yummy | July 29, 2009 at 02:49 PM
i think it would benefit the os to move him now and build for the future so this is good news
Posted by: brian | July 29, 2009 at 02:50 PM
I would suggest that in return for George Sherrill and Cla Meredith, the Dodgers offer Scott Elbert, James McDonald and Blake DeWitt. Sound fair?
Posted by: Dodgersin2009 | July 29, 2009 at 02:54 PM
The Dodgers have an ace in Clayton Kershaw, it just depends on whether he has the mental toughness for the post-season. And Billingsley and Wolf are no slouches. If the Dodgers plays the Rockies, Cubs or Giants in the first round, things look good for them. Obviously, the Phillies and Cardinals present match-up problems, but I think they'd be close series. . A could more relievers wil help.
Posted by: Dodgersin2009 | July 29, 2009 at 02:57 PM
George Sherrill to the Cubs for Kevin Hart, Jake Fox and Kevin Gregg with the cubs paying all of gregs salary...
Posted by: Mikey Roederer | July 29, 2009 at 02:58 PM
What about the many teams pursuing Bedard...
Oh that's right...
(poor Mariners)
Posted by: HumanToilet | July 29, 2009 at 02:58 PM
"Wont matter. Without an Ace the Dodgers aren't getting out of the first round sadly."
Chad Billingsley = ace.
Posted by: melonis rex | July 29, 2009 at 02:59 PM
Kershaw is no Ace at this point and did you not see Cards eat Bills alive last night.
Posted by: yummy | July 29, 2009 at 02:59 PM
I would suggest that in return for George Sherrill and Cla Meredith, the Dodgers offer Scott Elbert, James McDonald and Blake DeWitt. Sound fair?
Posted by: Dodgersin2009 | July 29, 2009 at 02:54 PM
....we already have meredith.... DUH! but the rest of it sounds fantastic!
Posted by: trmahoney01 | July 29, 2009 at 03:00 PM
Wow, the Erik Bedard trade looks better and better for the Os. The deal was;
SP Erik Bedard
FOR
SP Chris Tillman (DOminating AAA. BA's #1 Midseason pitching prospect)
CF Adam Jones (All-Star)
CL George Sherrill (Quality bullpen arm at peak value)
RP Mickolio (In MLs now)
SP Tony Butler (Injured)
Whatever the Os get for Sherrill, add them to that list. It's ungodly how much they might eventually get back from trading that single player.
Posted by: basemonkey | July 29, 2009 at 03:01 PM
MY God George Sherill has been overrated. He is a 32 year old set up guy for god sakes. I cant believe the prospects some of these teams are considering to land him. I pray to god my Angels don't buy into him at this price.
Posted by: BK | July 29, 2009 at 03:13 PM
Sherrill is not overrated by any means. He hits a rough spot here and there but he adjusted the way he releases the ball and he has been lights out since. He holds down the court against the dreaded AL East. As an Orioles fan, I'd hate to see him go, but some of these prospects may be too much to pass up.
Posted by: dabomb444 | July 29, 2009 at 03:16 PM
Despite Billingsley blowing it in the sixth last night, he looked great before then.
Wolf, Kershaw, and Billingsley all have what it takes to give 5 or 6 GREAT innings, its the bullpen that's been hurting us.
Kuroda was great in the post-season last year, don't forget, and we always have Weaver who's pitched in 2 different World Series as our # 5 starter.
A few good moves towards the 'pen could mean a lot for this team.
Posted by: ThinkBlue | July 29, 2009 at 03:23 PM
The Dodgers have an ace in Clayton Kershaw, it just depends on whether he has the mental toughness for the post-season. And Billingsley and Wolf are no slouches. If the Dodgers plays the Rockies, Cubs or Giants in the first round, things look good for them. Obviously, the Phillies and Cardinals present match-up problems, but I think they'd be close series. . A could more relievers wil help.
Posted by: Dodgersin2009 | July 29, 2009 at 02:57 PM
Hello.....pay attention. The Dodgers could not play SF or Colorado in the first round of the playoffs.
Posted by: koofax | July 29, 2009 at 03:23 PM
Wow, the Erik Bedard trade looks better and better for the Os. The deal was;
SP Erik Bedard
FOR
SP Chris Tillman (DOminating AAA. BA's #1 Midseason pitching prospect)
CF Adam Jones (All-Star)
CL George Sherrill (Quality bullpen arm at peak value)
RP Mickolio (In MLs now)
SP Tony Butler (Injured)
Whatever the Os get for Sherrill, add them to that list. It's ungodly how much they might eventually get back from trading that single player.
Posted by: basemonkey | July 29, 2009 at 03:01 PM
And Chris Tillman is making his major league debut tonight.
Posted by: BaltimoreOrioles21 | July 29, 2009 at 03:23 PM
His main asset is deception. He literally turns his back all the way around, hides the ball, and changes his arm angle with solid command. He will pitch around righties sometimes, but he's a good pitcher.
If you are trying to pick up a player to grow with your team and be a part of a young nucleus, he's not your guy. If you are looking for a dependable veteran who will stay cheap for 2+ years and help you win soon, esp. right now this year, he will be an asset. Usually if you trade for a consistent performer, you have to pay in $. Sherrill is cheap when you factor in how expensive a consistent arm gets.
Posted by: basemonkey | July 29, 2009 at 03:24 PM
My lord, what is wrong with the Cubs fans who post here sometimes? You are not going to get anything of much value for Fox or Hart or Gregg, much less the three of them together.
I love the position the O's are in with Sherrill. They have all but said they don't want to move him, but are leaving the possibility open that a deal comes which they can't pass up. The floor of a deal which lands Sherrill is now an overpay, and the Orioles have still got several teams interested.
Posted by: James F | July 29, 2009 at 03:28 PM
Does anyone have a clear idea what the O's are asking in return for Sherill?
Posted by: Halofan30 | July 29, 2009 at 03:29 PM
2-3 good prospects
Posted by: dabomb444 | July 29, 2009 at 03:33 PM
Cubs fans, please stop the madness. Drinking and commenting hurts you and us. I remember 1.5 years ago, every Cubs fan was posting about what a well kept secret Ronny Cedeno was. Your secret is still safe. Today he was packaged in a trade as a throw-in to return to the NL as a Pirate. Good lord, he was awful.
The Orioles are asking for 2 premium prospects if the other team agrees to pick up some of Sherrill's salary for this year. They'd want 3 premium prospects if they want the Os to pay. By "premium prospects" I think MacPhail meant a B prospect, or, a C prospect with real upside.
Posted by: basemonkey | July 29, 2009 at 03:40 PM
"2-3 good prospects"
Two isn't too much for Sherill considering I don't think he isn't a 2-month rental.
He'd fit nicely in the Angels pen.
Posted by: Halofan30 | July 29, 2009 at 03:41 PM
Sherrill is still under contract through 2011. The Orioles have a great trade chip here. They just need the right deal to make it happen.
Posted by: dabomb444 | July 29, 2009 at 03:45 PM
Any idea who becomes closer in Baltimore if Sherill is dealt?
Posted by: I-Cubs | July 29, 2009 at 03:47 PM
Most likely Jim Johnson
Posted by: dabomb444 | July 29, 2009 at 03:50 PM
From I-Cubs...
"Any idea who becomes closer in Baltimore if Sherill is dealt?"
---------------------
Jim Johnson would move into closer role, with Cla Meredith as primary set-up man.
Posted by: Haymaker | July 29, 2009 at 03:50 PM
If you really think about it, 2 years of cheap quality service is an asset. The question is how cheap is cheap. As a setup man, he's cheapish. As a closer, he's an extreme bargain. Dealing for Sherrill at minimum can shorten games by having a good arm used to high pressure locking up the 8th.
How much is that worth?
Posted by: basemonkey | July 29, 2009 at 03:51 PM
he would be perfect for the white sox, a good dependable lefty out of the bullpen, how much would it take to land him u think?
Posted by: shamrockyoass | July 29, 2009 at 03:57 PM
Sherill straight up for wood. Angels give up one player and get a solid lefty with cost controlled years.
Posted by: joemorgan=#1 | July 29, 2009 at 04:01 PM
he would be perfect for the white sox, a good dependable lefty out of the bullpen, how much would it take to land him u think?
Posted by: shamrockyoass | July 29, 2009 at 03:57 PM
If he went to the White Sox, he might take Jenks' job. Bobby has been iffy lately...
I wouldn't mind holding on to Sherill provided we get rid of Baez
Posted by: PS314 | July 29, 2009 at 04:05 PM
Wood won't get it done. We want a pitching prospect as well, and possibly a lower-level minor leaguer.
Posted by: dabomb444 | July 29, 2009 at 04:09 PM
Sherill straight up for wood. Angels give up one player and get a solid lefty with cost controlled years.
Posted by: joemorgan=#1 | July 29, 2009 at 04:01 PM
Wood would play SS I assume.. Thats a great deal for the O's.
Posted by: 661dodgerblue | July 29, 2009 at 04:22 PM
Wood would play 3B, at least for now. The O's are happy with what Izturis has given them at SS, and they feel his defense is what is helping the young pitchers (particularly Bergesen) be successful.
Rumors with the Dodgers center around Bell.
Posted by: mstrchef13 | July 29, 2009 at 04:28 PM
Wow Erik Bedard is becoming my favorite player he's making my o's better by the day
Posted by: BleedOrange | July 29, 2009 at 04:30 PM
The Os have 2 SSs right now. Wood's hitting would trump anything they have there now but Itzturis has been seen as an asset with the bat and glove. The bigger question is someone to replace Mora.
Posted by: basemonkey | July 29, 2009 at 04:32 PM
As an Angels fan, I'm now of the mind that as bad as their pen has been, the Angels would still be best served going after a couple of very good relief pitchers. At some point you'd think Santana and Saunders can turn the corner...even just bit.
Posted by: Halofan30 | July 29, 2009 at 07:07 PM
Time for Brian Sabean to bolster his bullpen:
Madison Bumgarner for Sherrill
Posted by: vtadave | July 29, 2009 at 07:21 PM
How about the Sox get Sherrill for like Fields and Harrell . And then trade Dotel for prospects.
Posted by: soxfan4life | July 29, 2009 at 07:46 PM
Fields and Poreda for Sherrill. High potential SP and a young fella who needs a change of scenery. As I see it, the White Sox have enough SP depth in the minors/majors to let Poreda go, i.e. Torres and Richard, with a few others looking like they are going to really develop. Baltimore needs to bring in SPs who are ready to serve in the bigs right now, not a year from now, as they need time to adjust as their other prospects start coming up. The Twins have done that very well -- staggering prospects over a few years, so as not to look like a AAAA team any one year.
Posted by: gadamer | July 29, 2009 at 07:47 PM
Who other than Jim Johnson could be in line for the closing role?
Posted by: Nick.H | July 29, 2009 at 07:49 PM
>> "Who other than Jim Johnson could be in line for the closing role?"
No one really... JJ has seniority in the bullpen as well as the best stuff... Baez is the only other choice and he s*cks.
Posted by: HumanToilet | July 29, 2009 at 07:57 PM
O's should steer well clear of Josh Fields... would be a waste of a good trade chip for a soon to be 27 year old "bleh."
Posted by: HumanToilet | July 29, 2009 at 07:58 PM
The Sox would be dumb to send Poreda packing. He seems legit. Throw in Buehrle Danks and Floyd and the Sox have a great YOUNG rotation for next season. Torres and Richard could fight it out for the 5th starter role next year.
Posted by: Tough | July 29, 2009 at 08:16 PM
I agree with both posts by HumanToilet, JJ would be the only person to close for the O's if Sherrill is traded and Josh Fields would not be enough for GS. The only question I had with the posts were how does someone have a screen name of HumanToilet?
Posted by: OrioleVol | July 29, 2009 at 08:34 PM
I would prefer Bell over Wood, but either would be nice for GS.
Posted by: freedoms | July 29, 2009 at 08:41 PM
Who other than Jim Johnson could be in line for the closing role?
Posted by: Nick.H | July 29, 2009 at 07:49 PM
Chris Ray is due back in a couple weeks, JJ will hold it down until then
Posted by: PS314 | July 29, 2009 at 08:46 PM
Chris Ray is due back in a couple weeks, JJ will hold it down until then
Posted by: PS314 | July 29, 2009 at 08:46 PM
JJ will continue to pitch over Ray, Ray has been awful for 2 years and battled arm issues throughout both years.
Posted by: freedoms | July 29, 2009 at 08:48 PM
The Dodgers AAA pitcher in Albuquerque was supposed to start tonight and was scratched just before game time.... Just thought some of you may find that interesting.
Posted by: Baseballfan23 | July 29, 2009 at 08:50 PM
give the orioles fields n some throw in if they are dumb enough...it would work out great for the sox...add another bullpen arm n get rid of fields n give his at bats to kotsay...but no way poreda gets involved in this one...hes worth alot more
Posted by: BestTraDeNevErMAde | July 29, 2009 at 08:57 PM
Sorry, I forgot his name. That's Scott Elvert that was scratched at the last minute.
Posted by: Baseballfan23 | July 29, 2009 at 08:57 PM
Wow, got to love the Cubs hate even in this post, stupid. To say they would get nothing for Gregg is about right, but to say Hart and Fox arent worth much is dumb.
Hart is a young pitcher that has made 3 very good starts and has been consistent out of the bull pen for three years and fox is hitting over .310 for crying outloud, he cant play defense that well, but my goodness the guy has DH written all over him.
I wish people werent blinded by the hate for the Cubs and just come up with the same idiotic thought that all Cubs players are crap.
Posted by: #1Cubsfan | July 29, 2009 at 09:09 PM
"give the orioles fields n some throw in if they are dumb enough"
MacPhail is quite willing to hold on to Sherrill if he doesn't find a good trade. The guy has a very club friendly contract this season, and we could easily offload him in the winter for (I imagine) a pretty good deal. Also Sherrill wants to stay here, and he does have a role to play on this team - it's nice to have at least one guy you can rely on in the bullpen with all these young starters (even Jim Johnson is looking a bit shaky recently).
That said I think Sherrill is a bit underrated. If you look at his splits this season they are not as bad as they have been in the past. His K/BB is around 4.00 against lefties and 2.00 against righties. His HR/9 is 0.00 against lefties and 1.00 against righties (that used to be a big problem with him). The biggest thing is the walks - his BB/9 is essentially identical between righties and lefties (he just strikes out righties half as much).
My point is, he is extremely dominant against lefties, but he's not terrible against righties anymore (I would classify him as "above average"). He has all the other things you look for in a closer - mentality and all that - and in addition I think he pitches better when under pressure (he has been a totally different pitcher ever since Trembley hinted he was going to closer by committee). Considering how well he is doing for a crappy team like the O's, I think he would be a huge asset in the playoffs.
Posted by: ugen64 | July 29, 2009 at 09:15 PM
Why do we have to view trades as a zero sum game, where someone wins and the other loses? Why can't they be win-win? OK, don't put Poreda in the deal, and don't plan on getting Sherrill. No possible way they give him up without getting something substantial in return -- why would they? And for all the love Poreda is getting, it is a little hyperbolic. I mean, the guy has thrown a bit out of the pen, that's it. Besides, Williams has looked great at Charlotte, and he dazzled tonight against the Twins. Maybe Poreda is the real thing, but that is the way trades go down: you gotta give up something good to get something good. Kenny Williams knows this. If you try to stiff other GM's, that gets around. Oh, and as Hawk just said, KW might have just found his lefty in Williams...then that ends this discussion.
Posted by: gadamer | July 29, 2009 at 09:18 PM
I don't think I like anything the White Sox could offer. After Poreda, they have Flowers who I like but the Os have Wieters who is better. After them it thins out very quick. You can argue for Allen, Richard, Danks but they all have some set of issues to work through that keeps them really C prospects. After them, you start to reach organizational depth guys. Very scary system.
Posted by: basemonkey | July 29, 2009 at 09:49 PM
Allen is gone
Posted by: John Porter | July 29, 2009 at 09:57 PM
Scott Elbert was scratched from his start tonight and George Sherrill did not pitch in the 9th with the O's up by 4. JJ pitched the last 2 innings for the save. GS never even warmed up so I think GS is gone and Elbert is either traded or being called up by LA. It looks like the Dodger O's trade is done, just not announced yet.
Posted by: OrioleVol | July 29, 2009 at 10:27 PM
If the White Sox want Sherrill, they shouldn't offer the farm.
And they certainly shouldn't deal their first round pick from two years ago who can start next season (Poreda) for a 32 year old setup guy.
I'd say Fields, Torres (trade value is highest now) and a lower level prospect would be a fair deal.
Fields may not be having a good season but he's still got potential to be a productive power hitter.
Posted by: Cold Golden Falstaff | July 30, 2009 at 08:01 AM
That's an awful deal. ^^^
Posted by: basemonkey | July 30, 2009 at 08:43 AM
If offering two B prospects is considered "offering the farm," then there's a bigger problem than picking up bullpen depth. I would think that team is better off keeping their prospects.
Posted by: basemonkey | July 30, 2009 at 08:46 AM
Dodgers need to give up 6 prospects for Halladay. If they want, they can trade him at the deadline next year for 4 equal prospects for 2 better ones. A year of Halladay for 2 lower level prospects? I'll take that every time. Look at what the Pirates got for Wilson and Snell...Prospects are easy to aquire any time
Posted by: DirtyJohnston | July 30, 2009 at 11:56 AM
I would say that Kuo's apparent return to form (he's looked absolutely dominanting his last 2 outings against the Cards) probably mitigates the need to get Sherrill.
My guess is they are holding Elbert and/or Bell back in case they need to include one or both in a trade for Halladay.
The Dodgers could always go for cheaper alternatives like the Reds' Arthur Rhodes if they get Halladay.
Posted by: Die-Hard Dodger Fan | July 30, 2009 at 11:57 AM
Billingley is NOT an ace. He crumbled in the playoffs and has displayed he doesn't have the heart and grit to be the dodger's no. 1. The problem is, I doubt the Jays would want a guy that can only pitch five innings before he falls apart.
Posted by: wills100 | July 30, 2009 at 12:10 PM
if all Sherrill is going to cost the Dodgers is Josh Bell, do it. Bell strikes me as another billy ashley, or andy laroche, with the promise of big power that just will not produce at the big league level, and if it does it will come with many k's.
Posted by: aj7380 | July 30, 2009 at 12:19 PM
Can a Dodger fan run down their prospects?
Posted by: Jays24 | July 30, 2009 at 12:33 PM
Scott Elbert was scratched from his start tonight and George Sherrill did not pitch in the 9th with the O's up by 4. JJ pitched the last 2 innings for the save. GS never even warmed up so I think GS is gone and Elbert is either traded or being called up by LA. It looks like the Dodger O's trade is done, just not announced yet.
Posted by: OrioleVol | July 29, 2009 at 10:27 PM
GS warmed up in the bottom of the 8th last night. He did not enter the game because we scored to make it a non-save situation for Sherill, but still a save situation for JJ, since he came into the game earlier. So don't think that was a precursor to a trade.
Posted by: PS314 | July 30, 2009 at 12:38 PM
aj7380 - MacPhail wants at least 2 prospects for Sherill. It would probably require Bell and a C+ pitching prospect (like Elbert).
Posted by: ugen64 | July 30, 2009 at 12:59 PM
Jays24 wrote: Can a Dodger fan run down their prospects?
Well, first, I don't count Kershaw as a prospect as he is solid MLB roster and not moving.
The prospects, as I would rank them:
Pitchers:
Josh Lindblom
Ethan Martin
Scott Elbert
James McDonald
Eric Stults
Position Players:
Devaris Gordon (ss)
Lambo (OF)
Bell (3B)
De Jesus (ss)
De Witt (3B-MLB roster)
If I am the Blue Jays, for Halladay, I would want:
Josh Lindblom, Ethan Martin, Devaris Gordon and Josh Bell
Elbert and DeJesus are injury risks. Stults and DeWitt have lower upsides. I don't have an opinion on Lambo, sounds like power potential is there.
Posted by: Dodgersin2009 | July 30, 2009 at 01:22 PM
In contrast, for Sherrill, I would think a deal like McDonald, Elbert and DeWitt might work.
Which means the Dodgers have enough minor league depth to make a deal for BOTH Halladay and Sherrill if their want to really deplete their prospect stockpile and somewhat mortgage their future. Personally, I would make the trade for Halladay but not for Dherrill. Instead of Sherrill, the Dodgers could get Joe Beimel back for a single top prospect. Beimel is not awesome nor a clubhouse leader, but as a middle releiver he would be as serviceable as Sherrill.
Posted by: Dodgersin2009 | July 30, 2009 at 01:31 PM
"Wont matter. Without an Ace the Dodgers aren't getting out of the first round sadly."
Like last year?
Posted by: cheba63 | July 30, 2009 at 02:06 PM
What are the Dodgers plan come playoff time? Are you seriously going to head into the playoffs with Kershaw and not only risk over pitching him, but to have a starting pitcher on a limited pitch count take the mount twice in a 7 game series?
Posted by: Cronus | July 30, 2009 at 02:09 PM
have we not learned to not trust twitter yet?
Posted by: 04Forever | July 30, 2009 at 02:12 PM
interested to see who they gave up.
i guess halladay's DONE with the Dodgers.
Nice! if we both got to the LCS the rotations would match up like so:
Lee vs Billingsley
Hamels vs Kershaw
Blanton vs Kuroda
Happ vs Wolf
hmmmm.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | July 30, 2009 at 02:14 PM
IF the Dodgers don't sit Kershaw down, continue to run up his innings heading in to the postseason...it'll be interesting to see if he gets hit with the Verducci Effect, as Cole Hamels has early this season.
Posted by: Muggi | July 30, 2009 at 02:17 PM
Interesting. I think Sherrill was warming up during the 8th today (which was after 2:03 PM), but Hendrickson was able to get through the last two innings himself.
Posted by: ugen64 | July 30, 2009 at 02:19 PM
Lee vs Billingsley
Advantage Dodgers-- they murder LHP and Lee is overrated.
Hamels vs Kershaw
Advantage Phillies. Hamels owns the Dodgers, but Kershaw is getting better every day, although he may be exhausted by the end of the year.
Blanton vs Kuroda
Advantage Dodgers, presuming Kuroda is healthy.
Happ vs Wolf
Push. Happ is too unknown, he could come up big or he could melt down. Wolf is having a career year and is a LHP.
Posted by: surfacetear | July 30, 2009 at 02:23 PM
Will Sherill remain the closer in LA, or go to set-up man?
Posted by: Bustin Suds | July 30, 2009 at 02:23 PM
Sherrill will set up Broxton.
Posted by: vtadave | July 30, 2009 at 02:30 PM
surfacetear,
haha. the reigning AL cy young award winner is overrated and he's WORSE than a pitcher that has amassed a 7.52 ERA in 5 july starts. you care to rethink that???
oh over that same time Lee has amassed a 2.37ERA against AL teams in 5 starts.
oh and let's compare Blanton and Kuroda's most recent months shall we?
Blanton in 4 July starts has a 1.21 ERA and 8 of his last 10 starts have been quality starts while Kuroda has a 6.14 ERA in 4 July starts and 3 quality starts in his last 10.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | July 30, 2009 at 02:35 PM
I hate that we have to use July stats in the playoffs. It's so unfair. Who made that rule anyway?
Posted by: DirtyJohnston | July 30, 2009 at 02:41 PM
Ken Gurnick says its a done deal. http://trades.mlblogs.com/archives/2009/07/dodgers_acquire_sherrill.html
Posted by: dodgrdog88 | July 30, 2009 at 02:44 PM
I hate this deal I wanted Bell and Elbert to end up in Cleveland in a Victor Martinez.
This is a good trade for Baltimore if it goes through IMO.
Posted by: baseballnuts | July 30, 2009 at 02:44 PM
Scott Elbert and Josh Bell for Sherrill?
Well done, MacPhail.
Bell gives them a high upside third baseman, the kind of prospect that they haven't really had since Billy Rowell moved off the position, and he's fallen flat on his face as a hitter anyways.
And Elbert gives them a high-upside lefty arm that's pretty close to being MLB-ready.
If the Orioles can toss out there a Tillman/Matusz/Arietta/Elbert/Erbe rotation out there soon, then people should really watch out.
It's pretty unbelievable how much this organization has moved since since Angelos loosened the reins and let MacPhail actually run the team.
Posted by: scribbletone | July 30, 2009 at 02:44 PM
dodgers can't make a deal for halladay or lee but will overpay for a decent lefty reliever?????
smells of casey blake. good guy, good ryan-freel-type, but not worth carlos santana even if indians had thrown in the CD/DVD box set of his entire back catalogue
Posted by: crash | July 30, 2009 at 02:48 PM
Hmmm, my angry ranting comment was already deleted.
I'd much rather give up Johnson than Elbert, but why in the crap did we trade Bell? He was the future at 3b, screw Dewitt. Ughhh.
Posted by: Ivdown | July 30, 2009 at 02:48 PM
I did not think Bell would be in this deal. Good trade both sides.
Posted by: studio179 | July 30, 2009 at 02:48 PM
Lee vs Billingsley
Advantage Dodgers-- they murder LHP and Lee is overrated.
Posted by: surfacetear | July 30, 2009 at 02:23 PM
Yeah, one overlooked element about the Phils' rotation vs. the Dodgers is how left-handed it would appear to be.
The Dodgers really hit left-handers well and it could almost result in a reverse effect of what happened to the Cubs against the Dodgers last year when the Cubs' lineup was so right-handed and therefore had a hard time against Lowe, Billz and Kuroda.
Its actually a big advantage for the Dodgers to face so many lefties.
Something to consider.
Posted by: Die-Hard Dodger Fan | July 30, 2009 at 02:49 PM
IT'S NOT ELBERT.
I repeat, it's NOT ELBERT.
It was Josh Bell and Steven Johnson.
Posted by: silverwidow | July 30, 2009 at 02:49 PM
I hate that we have to use July stats in the playoffs. It's so unfair. Who made that rule anyway?
Posted by: DirtyJohnston | July 30, 2009 at 02:41 PM
we don't. they're just the most recent stats and that's the best predictor of future performance IMO. That and when they've been in pressure situations how do they perform. wonder who that favors???
Posted by: philsWSchamps | July 30, 2009 at 02:49 PM
Angels, where are you??? Your rotation is lackluster to say the least and your bullpen leaves a lot to be desired. The offense has carried this team. Time to get them some help.
Trade some prospects for Heath Bell and Jason Frasor. This team is not likely to stay intact next year, so let's try to win now.
Posted by: Halofan30 | July 30, 2009 at 02:51 PM
Phew, went from being a horrible looking trade to not so bad.
Posted by: cheba63 | July 30, 2009 at 02:51 PM
Johnson is a real disappointment to me as an O's fan, and one which downgrades this trade a lot.
I hope the O's love Josh Bell something crazy, because this doesn't seem like the sort of deal which they had been saying would be required to land Sherrill.
Posted by: James F | July 30, 2009 at 02:51 PM
Now it's time to put Elbert in a package w/ McDonald, DeJesus, Lindblom, and Lambo, or something to that effect, to get Halladay
Posted by: aj7380 | July 30, 2009 at 02:51 PM
Steve Johnson is the son of the former Orioles pitcher turned broadcaster Dave Johnson.
Bell solves 3B or 1B if he can't stick at the hot corner.
Nice pickup MacPhail!
Posted by: jtrea81 | July 30, 2009 at 02:51 PM
Did either of these guys project to be anything better than slightly above average at their peak?
Posted by: 22erie | July 30, 2009 at 02:52 PM
great deal for the dodgers.
Bell was a good player, but a double A player. He still needs time and who knows what can happen.
Kuo ( although shakey), Sherril, Broxton.
good bullpen.
And the prospects Toronto wants are still with the dodgers.
Posted by: milanokis | July 30, 2009 at 02:53 PM
"Now it's time to put Elbert in a package w/ McDonald, DeJesus, Lindblom, and Lambo, or something to that effect, to get Halladay"
Exactly. Neither Johnson or Bell were going to be in a package for Halladay. HINT HINT.
Posted by: OedipusSC | July 30, 2009 at 02:54 PM
Wow, it looks as though LA still has enough left to be in on Halliday. Stay tuned?
Posted by: abcrazy4dodgers | July 30, 2009 at 02:54 PM
O's didn't elbert. it's steve johnson and bell.
Posted by: dodgrdog88 | July 30, 2009 at 02:55 PM
didn't get*
Posted by: dodgrdog88 | July 30, 2009 at 02:55 PM
Actually, it was reported that the Jays really liked Bell, so he likely would have been a part of a Halladay deal. Not that one can't still get done, though.
Posted by: cheba63 | July 30, 2009 at 02:55 PM
o's didnt get elbert... they got steve johnson and bell...
Posted by: dodgrdog88 | July 30, 2009 at 02:55 PM