« Trades Of The Decade: Pierzynski For Nathan, Bonser, Liriano |
Main
| Heyman On Damon, Scutaro, Red Sox »
By Ben Nicholson-Smith [November 3, 2009 at 12:28pm CST]
Some links for Tuesday...
- The Nationals hired former White Sox GM Ron Schueler as a special assistant to Mike Rizzo, according to a team press release.
- Jays GM Alex Anthopoulos must decide in the coming days whether to proceed with a payroll of about $80MM or ask ownership for more money, according to MLB.com's Jordan Bastian.
- Phil Wood of MASN.com doesn't think it makes sense for the Nats to trade Adam Dunn away.
- ESPN.com's Rob Neyer says the Yankees will probably want to become younger this offseason, even if it's just a marginal change.
- Former Rockies assistant GM Chris Rice tells Irv Moss of the Denver Post how "exciting and tense" the expansion draft was before the team's inaugural season.
- As Danny Knobler of CBSSports points out, the Phillies' decision to go after Cliff Lee instead of Roy Halladay looks smart right now.
- Harry Pavlidis of The Hardball Times looks at Stephen Strasburg's performance in the Arizona Fall League and says the top pick "is proving to be everything he was hyped to be."
- MLB.com's Matthew Leach guesses that Matt Holliday will not return to the Cardinals in 2010.
- Richard Durrett of ESPNDallas.com reports that the Rangers could decide today whether Thad Bosley, Rusty Greer, Clint Hurdle or Gerald Perry will become the team's next hitting coach.
- Joe Christensen of the Minneapolis Star Tribune reports that the Twins outrighted Brian Buscher to Triple A. He can become a minor league free agent 16 days after the World Series. Aaron Gleeman doesn't expect Buscher to remain in the organization.
The Yankees will become younger by signing Alrodis Chapman for $70M.
Posted by: icedrake523 | November 03, 2009 at 10:38 AM
The Yankees are going to drop Matsui, now there is a big surprise... not.
Posted by: A | November 03, 2009 at 10:40 AM
After reading the article, I can see a big pool of drool, on the floor in Cashman's office. Thinking when Mauer becomes a Free Agent.
Posted by: Cyyoung | November 03, 2009 at 10:53 AM
"Thinking when Mauer becomes a Free Agent."
Yeah, the Yankees really love the "over 40" crowd.
Posted by: A | November 03, 2009 at 10:56 AM
"Yeah, the Yankees really love the "over 40" crowd."
Haha, good stuff.
At any rate, the Yankees will probably overpay for Chapman and Holliday, although much more in the case of Chapman.
Posted by: not sure | November 03, 2009 at 11:09 AM
"The Yankees will become younger by signing Alrodis Chapman for $70M."
Then again, for that money they could sign the best player available in every round of the draft for the next like 5-6 years..
Posted by: scribbletone | November 03, 2009 at 11:11 AM
While I agree that the Yanks will sign Holliday, I really don't think they will end up signing Chapman.
Posted by: redsox22 | November 03, 2009 at 11:23 AM
i cant see the yankees signing holliday unless the red sox resign bay and then go out and trade for gonzales, fielder etc
Posted by: Timmy B | November 03, 2009 at 12:22 PM
Has Chapman thrown a bullpen session in America yet?
Posted by: 661dodgerblue | November 03, 2009 at 12:28 PM
No more Buscher? Can it finally be true? Don't toy with me Gleeman...
Posted by: MorneauVP | November 03, 2009 at 12:28 PM
The real question is: if Holliday doesn't resign with the Cardinals, who becomes the LF for us? I suggested an idea of signing Polanco and Beltre, and having Polanco play 2B, Beltre play 3B, and move Skip to the OF to play either LF or RF. I think this way would be cheaper. Polanco still hits for good average and is patient at the plate with good defense. Beltre also has good defense and also has some pop. Maybe this would be the better way to go than signing Holliday to a "Teixeira like contract" (as Boras puts it). What do you guys think?
Posted by: Cardsfan4life | November 03, 2009 at 01:01 PM
Also, I really feel like it will come down to the Mets and Cardinals as which team gets Holliday. I don't see the Yankees signing Holliday. Damon is raking in the WS so far, so why replace him? Granted, he doesn't have the best arm and he is getting older, but he would be cheaper than Holliday and will still produce and thrive in that lineup.
Posted by: Cardsfan4life | November 03, 2009 at 01:04 PM
Some big news breaking in this post.
-- The Yankees will want to become marginally younger. Shocking. Most teams are constantly trying to become older. What's next, Neyer informing us that the Red Sox would like to become more athletic or the Angels would like to get better players?
-- The Nats paying Adam Dunn $12m is stupid. With or without Dunn this is a 70 win team. Keep your $12m and trade the guy to a club that needs a DH.
Posted by: bjsguess | November 03, 2009 at 01:06 PM
The Jays ought to save money and actually spend it on the draft next year.
Posted by: Alex Trebek | November 03, 2009 at 01:23 PM
Bjsguess: I agree wholeheartedly. Dunn is the perfect DH, so much of his value is lost on defense. If he could just DH he'd be totally worth $12 million. And just about every AL team should be interested (though some have some financial concerns).
Posted by: Steveo26 | November 03, 2009 at 01:25 PM
Yeah, I think that Dunn could be a really great fit for some team as a DH.
There are a lot of teams in the AL that sent out some awfully mediocre hitters as designated hitters.
I could definitely see someone like the Angels or White Sox showing interest in Dunn.
Posted by: scribbletone | November 03, 2009 at 01:31 PM
Adam Dunn does not like baseball.
Posted by: cascando | November 03, 2009 at 01:59 PM
A team that would be interesting would be the Orioles. Yes he's only signed for the one year. But that means they wouldn't have to mortgage their future like they would for Gonzalez or Fielder. O's desperately need a big power bat, whether they put Scott at first or just trade him I think Dunn would be huge for that offense.
Since I support both teams though its a bit hard for me to say what the O's would need to give up. Maybe a three team trade involving Scott and one of the O's young pitchers (not named Matsuz, Tillman or Arrieta)
Posted by: Steveo26 | November 03, 2009 at 02:34 PM
"A team that would be interesting would be the Orioles. Yes he's only signed for the one year. But that means they wouldn't have to mortgage their future like they would for Gonzalez or Fielder. O's desperately need a big power bat, whether they put Scott at first or just trade him I think Dunn would be huge for that offense.
Since I support both teams though its a bit hard for me to say what the O's would need to give up. Maybe a three team trade involving Scott and one of the O's young pitchers (not named Matsuz, Tillman or Arrieta)"
Awful deal for the Orioles.
What benefit does Baltimore get from trading Scott and a pitcher, while spending about $9M, for Dunn, outside of winning maybe 78 games instead of 75?
Thanks, but no thanks.
Posted by: scribbletone | November 03, 2009 at 04:08 PM
I think Dunn Is decent. It would cool if the O's got him they can use anything they can get, and i mean ANYTHING
Posted by: Richard | November 03, 2009 at 06:43 PM
"The Yankees will probably want to become younger this offseason"
Isn't that what they say every year, but they still keep overpaying for average talent? With the payroll the Yanks have every year, they should be winning the World Series every single year!! I'd love for Philly to come back & win the next 2. Yankees 2009 CHOKE!!! Ha ha ha
Posted by: redsoxn8tion | November 03, 2009 at 09:59 PM
Scribble: I understand what you mean, but if I'm the O's Its worth the risk for Dunn as long as you aren't giving up any of their top prospects. The O's have a 40 man roster crunch going on right now, trading 2-4 guys (depending on the deal) for Dunn would be a huge benefit to the O's. We know money isn't a big issue as they have plenty to spend. And if they sign a LaRoche, Delgado, ect. they will be spending 6-10 million and not getting near the offensive value (though LaRoche could at least play in the field as well).
If the O's could add one big bat, they would have a dangerous lineup. Also remember Dunn would eventually be a Type A free agent and the type of guy you'd offer arb. too. And personally if I'm the O's I'd work for an extension.
Anyone else they would trade for would be way too costly in terms of prospects (not to mention money). Sure maybe the O's aren't going the the postseason next year, but that doesn't mean they shouldn't make moves that make the team better.
Posted by: Steveo26 | November 03, 2009 at 11:04 PM
If the Yankees sign Holliday then I guess he wont have to worry about hitting at a pitchers park. Holliday might do himself a favor staying out of the AL EAST though. Seriously. He was not impressive in the AL. Not Texiera impressive anyway. Holliday might find more money in the NL. Then again it might have been a slump, and he might hit around 330. with 30+ HR in the right lineup/ballpark.
RedSoxn8tion, in all fairness last years Yankee FA sigings panned out pretty well. I would not consider Tex, CC, or AJ to BE average talents.
Posted by: manny24 | November 04, 2009 at 01:14 AM
"RedSoxn8tion, in all fairness last years Yankee FA sigings panned out pretty well. I would not consider Tex, CC, or AJ to BE average talents."
Better than Penny, Smoltz, and the other "genius" signings Theo made in the offseason which every analyst was raving about. Look where that got you, swept in the first round lol. Open up the wallet, nation.
Posted by: East Coast Bias | November 04, 2009 at 02:27 AM
Eastcoastbias, really???? Did I not completely give the Yankees props for thier signings????? OH wait! I did! They are great signings NOT average talents. Meaning I was saying they are exceptional talents. Please read before you go all NY on me. Im a Sox fan and I have yet to trash a single comment that was at the very least "reasonable".
Oh and who do you propose the Sox should have signed and where would you have put them??? Last time I checked Theo signed some pitchers for depth hoping they would contribute. He did it because are starting 5 was full and there was no real talent left on the SP market after CC worth taking one are starters spots. As for position players as I remember Boston did try to open its wallet for Tex, very much so. He chose the additional money which is fine.
Theo made some real good moves last offseason non the less. He traded Crisp for Ramirez (Can you spell STEAL). He also brought in Saito.Then V-mart, and Wagner. All very effective deals for us. Besides we got eliminated because of offense problems. We have a couple aging vets clunking up are lineup admittedly. Don't worry though AROD, Jeter, Posada, CC, AJ, Tex, MO....I mean im sure none of their aging will hold the Yankees back from advancing to the WS in the future. They all have massive contracts, and they are not gonna play great forever. I will have plenty of playoffs to watch your team get eliminated because they got oldies clogging up positions long term at such high contracts they will either stay and drag you down, or accumulate to MILLIONS AND MILLIONS in dumped salaries. Then again the optimist in you probably expects them to play like all-stars till their contracts expire.
Posted by: manny24 | November 04, 2009 at 06:25 AM
The Twins got rid of Buscher. That's too bad. I thought he was going to be the next David Wright. Well at least he helped out the team so much during the season. Well i'm sure he will be a huge factor for another team next season.(sarcastic)
Posted by: R.I.P. Kirby | November 04, 2009 at 04:52 PM
whoa, hold up a second dude. Manny24, stop being so defensive and learn to differentiate who the comment is aimed at. My comments were towards redsoxnation guy, NOT you.
I was quoting you to agree with you and further add my .02, not to go against what you were saying. I thought that was obvious...?
Posted by: East Coast Bias | November 04, 2009 at 05:06 PM