MLB Rumors - MLB Trade Rumors
Subscribe to MLB Trade Rumors using RSS
Home     Contact     About     Advertise     Archives     Widget     Twitter      RSS Usage

« Tigers Notes: Laird, Putz, Lyon | Main | Mets Meet With Boras »

Reds To Cut Payroll, Big Names Could Be Dealt

Add the Reds to the list of teams that are slashing, rather than spending, this off-season.  Fanhouse's Ed Price and Jeff Fletcher are reporting that Cincinnati is looking to cut their payroll from $71MM in 2009 to between the $65-$70MM range next season.  While it may not sound like much of a reduction, Cot's Baseball Contracts lists the Reds as owing just under $66MM to just ten players for next season, leaving little room to fill out the rest of the roster.

Lagging attendance figures are to blame for the Reds' financial cutbacks.  Price and Fletcher noted that attendance at the Great American Ballpark dropped by more than 15 percent from 2008 to 2009.  General manager Walt Jocketty was quoted in the piece as saying, "We're going to probably have less to spend this year than we have in the past...It just depends on how [ticket] sales go this offseason."

If Cincinnati does make a deal, the likeliest candidates to be moved are second baseman Brandon Phillips (owed just under $7MM in 2010), and pitchers Aaron Harang ($12.5MM) and Bronson Arroyo ($12.25MM).  Phillips, with his .452 slugging percentage over the last four seasons, is the most attractive candidate to other clubs given his power from the second base position and reasonable contract.  Harang and Arroyo are both coming off decent years themselves, but Price and Fletcher speculate that their bigger contract numbers would require the Reds to absorb a chunk of their salaries if traded.

One star player who looks to be staying in Cincinnati is closer Francisco Cordero, who Price and Fletcher say the club "would prefer to keep" despite the $25MM he's owed through 2011.  A very intriguing trade chip could be young slugger Joey Votto, if the Reds wanted to make room for star prospect Yonder Alonso at first base.  Another team could be convinced to take on a bad contract if it meant getting Votto, who isn't eligible for free agency until after the 2013 season.


Comments

Votto is the BoSox Target now ( I hope) take Harang to be a solid 4th or 5th starter

Can Phillips play third? That would be a ridiculous infield if Phillips could play third and the Phillies aquired him.

Again, Why would the Reds trade Votto to make room for an unproven AA 1st baseman? The person who wrote this article is a complete idiot.

Harang and Arroyo are as good as gone.

Phillips is a fairly mediocre hitter on the road..

dodgers should pick up brandon phillips for 2b!!

Vottos going nowhere

It seems foolish for the Reds to even think about giving up Votto. Why not trade Alonso instead?

Id be fine with trading phillips though and give Frazier a shot at 2nd

boston gets: votto and harang

cincinatti gets: bucholtz, bowden, kalish

thoughts? too much, too little?

You want better attendance then you need to field a better product.

Cordero should also be the first one to go, .500 teams at best don't need 12 million dollar closers, but they need SPs that can get 200 innings and the offense needs Phillips.

Perhaps if they didn't throw millions at Dusty Baker and Taveras they would have money for their players that are actually worth what they are paying them.

I'm a Reds fan but I'm getting closer each year to just caring about my fantasy teams.

Getting really tired of large market teams being able to go out and spend billions then throw another 60 million at it just to fix their backend of the rotation when other teams have to compete with around a quarter of the payroll.

And if the Reds are wanting to cut payroll, WHY WOULD THEY TRADE A PLAYER WHO MAKES 437,000?

Votto isn't going anywhere. The Reds should keep Phillips because they just don't have much hitting. Arroyo or Harang to a team like the Nationals who are looking to start spending some cash makes perfect sense.

"Getting really tired of large market teams being able to go out and spend billions then throw another 60 million at it just to fix their backend of the rotation when other teams have to compete with around a quarter of the payroll.

Posted by: schellis | November 10, 2009 at 10:30 PM"

I totally agree. Selig is a total idiot. I'm not even sure if he watches baseball.

Perfect trade for the METS a#2 starter in HARANG and a young 1b; i would ask if a package of F-MART,NIESE,MURPHY(WHO COULD PLAY 3B FOR THE REDS) AND ANOTHER PROSPECT.
Then the METS could sign HOLLIDAY and WOLF.
2010 LINEUP;
REYES
WRIGHT
BELTRAN
HOLLIDAY
VOTTO
FRANCOUER
BARAJAS
CASTILLO
2010 ROTATION;
SANTANA
HARANG
WOLF
PEREZ
PELFREY/MAINE

what would it take to get Votto in SF?

I know we most likely have to include Madison Bumgarner but what else if we took on Arroyo's contract?

Trade Votto?
I say nay.
Harang and Arroyo need to be dumped. They should have been dumped at the deadline.
I agree with Danya, keep Votto and use Yonder to "sweeten" the deal. He's the one with something to prove, not Votto.

Bumgarner and Posey.

Votto is massively popular in Cincinnati and honestly he's their only true offensive threat.

Its always a shame when a team is forced to overhaul their roster because attendance was down a little bit.

Votto ain't being traded. Cost controlled, and one of the best young hitters in the game. No way the Reds trade their probably face of the franchise.

At least not yet.

Votto is a cheap/very good player. Why is his name even mentioned in a piece about the Reds wanting to cut payroll?

OMG, remember how badly votto KILLED the mets all year. He would be absolutley perfect, i would trade F-Mart, holt, murph, and tejada for harang and votto

"Perfect trade for the METS a#2 starter in HARANG and a young 1b; i would ask if a package of F-MART,NIESE,MURPHY(WHO COULD PLAY 3B FOR THE REDS) AND ANOTHER PROSPECT.
Then the METS could sign HOLLIDAY and WOLF.
2010 LINEUP;
REYES
WRIGHT
BELTRAN
HOLLIDAY
VOTTO
FRANCOUER
BARAJAS
CASTILLO
2010 ROTATION;
SANTANA
HARANG
WOLF
PEREZ
PELFREY/MAINE"

Dammit! Another Mets fan making an idiotic trade proposal! When will it stop?!?!


If Votto or Brandon Phillips is availble, I can see the Braves jumping on this. Cordero would be another player that the Braves would love getting. I doubt Votto or Bruce would be traded, but the Reds could get a ****load of prospects for them if made available.

"i would ask if a package of F-MART,NIESE,MURPHY(WHO COULD PLAY 3B FOR THE REDS) AND ANOTHER PROSPECT."

I say it every time but I have to say it again... Murphy is both useless and worthless, he was one of the worst first basemen in the league last year with no potential to become better. To any Mets fan who wants to put him in place of a real prospect, stop. It only makes every other person on this site roll their eyes and think you're nuts.

Trust me, there's no way the Reds are trading Votto, so quit with the idiotic trade proposals for him.

Phillips, Arroyo or Harang are most likely to go, although dumping Cordero should be their top priority.

When Votto is healthy he can play LF, so there could be room for both he and Yonder in the same Cincy lineup. I wouldn't trade him now.

I would look at Phillips and one of the two pricy starters. Cordero would make sense....but what team would take him? Makes too much and has years left. Why wouldn't a team just sign Valverde, Wagner, or Gregg for way less....or trade for Kerry Wood who makes near the same but for less years?

No team will want Cordero this winter unless the Reds pickup a lot of cash.


Now the starters? Not many of those on the market so you could get some value.

I could see a match with the Dodgers. They need a 2B and could use some starting pitching. Could Phillips and one of Haragn/Arroyo get the Reds Billingsley (who appears out of favor in LA) if the Reds took Pierre in return?

Would save the Reds a few million even with Bills' arby eligible. Dodgers get a solid 2B and a decent MOR starter. They'd still have Kershaw at the front of their rotation too. Losing Pierre will help absorb the new payroll.

Tavares was a bust in Cincy. Pierre could actually work in CF for them. Throw in Billingsley along with Cueto and Volquez (when he's healthy) and the Reds have the makings of a solid young staff (even better if Bailey develops).


Doubt it happens...but think a match could be found. Dodgers haven't been shy about making moves lately.

So here comes the ridiculous trade rumors involving the Red Sox and Votto. I should book mark for tomorrow when I'll need a good laugh.

Now all the Reds fans have to suffer through crazy trade ideas that will never happen.


Would the Brewers trade Braun after his 2nd season while still making close to league minimum?

Would the Phillies trade Utley after his 2nd season while still making close to league minimum?

Are the Giants going to trade Sandoval while still making close to league minimum?

Did the Cards trade Pujols after his 2nd season while still making close to league minimum and while Walt Jocketty was the GM in St. Louis?

NO.

Why would the Reds do this? If they plan on being competitive within the next 6-8 years Votto is going to be involved.

This is literally the dumbest thing I have ever read on this site. And we all know there are hundreds of stupid this written on this site everyday.

Getting really tired of large market teams being able to go out and spend billions then throw another 60 million at it just to fix their backend of the rotation when other teams have to compete with around a quarter of the payroll.

Posted by: schellis | November 10, 2009 at 10:30 PM"

It's your team's own fault. Don't whine because the NYY (let's be honest, that's who you're talking about) put the money back into the team.

Cincinnati used to be a perennial contender, won a World Series in 1990. It is your front office that traded Paul O'Neill for Roberto Kelly. It's your front office that handed out that contract to Cordero. Your team sure dropped a ton of coin on Griffey Jr, so let's not act like Cincinnati is Tampa Bay.

Just take it on the chin, make your team better, and get the folks to come back to the game.

"i would trade F-Mart, holt, murph, and tejada for harang and votto"

Seriously. Stop. That will get you Votto's jockstrap.

Joey Votto has had an OPS over the last 2 years that that been nipping at the heels of the likes of Pujols, Fielder, etc. Add to that he doesn't command either salary and is under team control for 4 years. IF the Reds really consider trading him, and by if I mean that chance Walt Jockety is really into shrooms, it will be for half the farm. So stop the belief you can get him for a couple of prospects and crap.

I see my trade as fair. F-Mart could potentially be their power hitting OF'er, they need a SS, but would have to wait 2 years for tejada, you can always use more pitching in holt, and murph can play 3rd

Attendance is down, time to slash payroll!

That's like saying, 'Sales are down, time to slash advertising'

Just stupid, greedy ownership.

I could see a match with the Dodgers. They need a 2B and could use some starting pitching. Could Phillips and one of Haragn/Arroyo get the Reds Billingsley (who appears out of favor in LA) if the Reds took Pierre in return?"

Oh god no. The whole point the Dodgers have made is to keep the rotation they have the same, and add to it. Do you really think that either of the two pitchers are upgrades over Billz?

And how is he 'out of favor'? Unless you talk to people who think Broxton is crap because he blew a game in Philly, then all other Dodger fans would laugh in your face...

Could someone please explain to me why the Reds traded for Scott Rolen at the deadline?

dont do that, no one knows...

Just for fun, what would it take for the Dodgers to get Votto? I know it wont happen, but curious

It'd be stunning if Votto is dealt considering how cheap, talented, far removed from free agency he is.

That being said, if the Reds are as desperate to shed payroll as the article makes them sound, they may have to in order to make other teams take their bad contracts. I mean, let's be honest here, not even the Yankees were willing to take on Arroyo this past season.


Gee, imagine that, the genius Walt Jocketty trades Edwin Encarnacion and two young, inexpensive Pitchers for old and injury prone Scott Rolen. The difference between Rolen's ($11 million) and Edwin E's ($4.75 million) salary for 2010 ($6.25 million) is about what the team is looking to cut in payroll.

Now, "win now" Ca$htellini is more concerned with the bottom line than actually winning and the Reds are probably going to have to trade one of their two proven starting Pitchers (Harang, Arroyo) or one of the guys who has produced Offense (Phillips) and above average Defense.

So, for those fans who were telling me that trading for Rolen and his improved Defense was a GOOD trade, please explain to me again how that makes the team better?

The way it is looking now, the Reds will have traded EE, two young, inexpensive Pitchers and one of either Harang, Arroyo or Phillips for the privilege of getting Scott Rolen for 115 Games at Third Base in 2010.

Without Harang or Arroyo, HOW is the pitching staff going to hold up?

Without Phillips, how is the Offense going to score Runs?

Jay Bruce put up better Minor League offensive numbers than Cozart and he struggled his first full year in the Majors. So now, if Phillips is traded, do people REALLY expect Cozart to play Gold Glove caliber defense and drive in nearly 100 RBI's his Rookie year?

you can't trade votto for any mlb player as they're probably closer to free agency and/or making more money already.

trade him for multiple prospects and they...still probably make more money.

I think Alonso looks like a beast, i wouldn't move him no matter how blocked he is.

the mets post goes without comment

and the reds aren't trading votto.

I still think the Yankees can make a better offer then the Red Sox. They could take on all of Francisco Cordero's contract to be there set up reliever if the got Votto to replace Damon. The Yankees can easily give up Cervelli, Pena, Jackson, Miranda, Kennedy, McAllister, Nova, Russo etc. They could even add Joba or Hughes but then they wouldn't take Cordero.

1. Murphy can play 3B? He can't even play 1B! Also, the Reds have 3B options coming through the minors to eventually replace Rolen.

2. Reds traded for Rolen because Walt and Castellini have huge man-crushes for him from their St. Louis days.

3. Again, the Fanhouse guys are morons to even suggest that the Reds trade Votto this offseason. Alonso is likely to be traded at some point in the next couple years, like Brewers did with LaPorta.

hmmm angels were involved in with alot of past rumors about harang

Ctown: Cozart wouldn't replace Phillips in the lineup. Todd Frazier would. Cozart is being talked about as a potential SS by the end of 2010.

Question. Cordero and Phillps to the Braves for Derek Lowe, Kelly Johnson, and taking on some of DL's contract.

Phillips is owed 18 million until the end of 2011
Cordero is owed 25 million until the end of 2011

Lowe is owed 45 million until the end of 2012
Kelly is going through ARB and is a free agent after 2012.

The Reds could also get a prospect to make it better. Just a thought.

I have said for a while that I could see a Martin Prado + for Brandon Phillips trade

I still think the Yankees can make a better offer then the Red Sox. They could take on all of Francisco Cordero's contract to be there set up reliever if the got Votto to replace Damon. The Yankees can easily give up Cervelli, Pena, Jackson, Miranda, Kennedy, McAllister, Nova, Russo etc. They could even add Joba or Hughes but then they wouldn't take Cordero.

Posted by: dan l | November 10, 2009 at 10:59 PM

Don't want to sound mean, but those are quite possibly the worst ideas I have EVER heard.

The Yankees don't need Francisco Cordero and his bloated contract setting up. The bullpen and minor leagues are loaded with guys who can do the exact same job for the league minimum.. or did you miss the 2009 season?

Trading Hughes or Joba makes ZERO sense because they are in our rotation.

Trading a bunch of guys for Votto when we could have Damon or Matsui on a one year deal for just money makes no sense. It makes about as much sense as the Reds actually wanting to move a cheap, cost-controlled player like Votto in the first place.

Prado plus what?

Not that I actually think Votto is even being considered traded by the Reds, but if they did I think he would fit well with ATL. We could send them a package around Medlen and Freeman (since we no longer need Freeman with Votto) and it frees up some money to go out and sign an OFer since we no longer have to re-sign LaRoche.

Or maybe im just in dreamland right now....yeah...that could be it....

"I see my trade as fair. F-Mart could potentially be their power hitting OF'er, they need a SS, but would have to wait 2 years for tejada, you can always use more pitching in holt, and murph can play 3rd"

I'll give you Martinez is a prospect, but consider he's coming off of knee surgery (very attractive for an outfielder) and has yet to show talent above AAA. Tejada is going to be your typical shortstop who has no power and a contact bat that, if he makes the majors, will make him a #8 or #9 hitter. Even Mets blogs don't call this guy a top prospect... he's the kind of guy that's a dime a dozen in the minors. As for Holt... you mean the guy who got bombed in AA last year? Yes, teams are lining up to get him! Seriously, could be something in the future, hell if Mets blogs call him a future #2 starter it must be true especially when every other thing I've read calls him either overrated or possibly an ok #3 arm. As for Murphy, I believe I've made my point clear. But let me make it simple... would you want a guy who barely makes a .740 OPS manning 3rd for your team? If every Mets fan REALLY believe Murphy is a worthy addition to any trade, why not keep him since he'll apparently have such a great future?

So to sum up: 1 prospect, 1 shortstop who you could become your #8 hitter, 1 guy who may or may not be overrated, and a guy who has a .741 OPS manning a position that you'd want a real slugger at. All this for a guy who is a decent arm and a young, cheap, slugging first baseman. So fair? No. Stupid? Yes.

Jocketty is a moron. He should have traded Harang, Phillips, and Arroyo two years ago: At this point Phillips pretty much sucks. He's a "somewhat" better version of Bill Hall. At this point, Harang is overpaid. Arroyo was always overpaid. Now they are going to "HAVE TO" throw in Votto in if they want to get anything resembling elite young talent. As much as I like Votto, finding a first baseman to hit homeruns at the great american ballpark won't be difficult.

I'm also gonna respond to some of the other posters:

No, the Giants wouldn't have to include Baumgardner in any package to get Votto. Baumgardner isn't going anywhere. The person that suggested it would take Baumgardner and Posey has his head so far up his...
Baumgardner is a potential future ace. Posey is an elite "catching" prospect. Votto is a very good player, but he's a first basemen...so no,not a chance. The Giants are really set up to become a dominant team for the next 5-6 years. You don't trade a potential future ace, and/or a potential future all star catcher for a second tier first basemen. I understand he's a very good player...but the Giants could get Prince Fielder or Adrian Gonzalez for Baumgardner and Posey...without a doubt.

If the Reds can get F-Mart from the Mets for Votto it's a steal for the Reds. Although, I submit that Jocketty is too incompetent to pull it off, even if Omar Minaya is.


I don't expect the Reds to trade Votto...because Jocketty is an idiot...but Votto to the Mets for like F-Mart and Holt would be a huge haul for Votto. I still think, and I think most scouts still think, that F-Mart is going to be one of the true elite players in baseball a few years down the road.

Basically the whole point of this, and what everybody needs to understand is that the Reds are gonna cut payroll by moving Phillips, Harang, and Arroyo...and in order to get any of these deals done, they're most likely gonna have to throw in Votto.


"I have said for a while that I could see a Martin Prado + for Brandon Phillips trade"


As a Braves fan I absolutely HATE that trade. Prado is legit, cheap, and can play 1B, 3B, or 2B. I would not be happy seeing us deal him right now.

Here Red Sox fans, lemme get you started on the right track cuz GOD knows that every freakin post in this thread is going to look like this:

"Red Sox get Votto, Phillips, Harang

Reds get Lowell and Bowden

Thats proabably too much to give to the Reds but Bowden is a garunteed ace, so I dont know if thats fair."

arroyo or Harang to the Nationals with Phillips for Gonzales, Orr, and someone from AAA like Chico.

Twins couldn't take on the pitchers but they might be interested in Phillips. What would it cost theoretically? what are the Reds looking for?

Tejada is a very good OBP/contact guy and by his #'s and projections should be a #2 hitter in the bigs, and he has a very good glove. Who do the reds have at short??

what would it take to land phillips?

Reds are going to have to throw in Votto in order to trade Phillips, Harang or Arroyo? Whatever...

Remember, this would be a salary dump. I don't think the Reds would care what they get for Harang or Arroyo. Some scrub minor-leaguer would be fine. And Phillips has good value, and the Reds would get something decent for him.

Baumgardner is a potential future ace. Posey is an elite "catching" prospect. Votto is a very good player, but he's a first basemen...so no,not a chance"

Um, what position does the best player in baseball play? Oh, yea, I remember, nevermind

First, I want to make this clear: I don't think in any way, shape, or form that the Mets will trade for Votto. However, I do want to defend their prospects a bit as they get trashed a bunch.

Believe it or not, the Mets farm system is generally ranked to be in the middle of pack with the caveat that most of its talent lies 1-2 years away. Yet every time I read a Mets fan suggest a trade offer involving their prospects, everyone jumps on them.

If you want to kill the Mets' prospects, that's fine, but then realize you can't really value other prospects that much higher. I think Cleveland will learn that lesson, after overvaluing the prospects they received from Boston and Philly in their midseason purge.

It shouldn't be hard to find a taker for Harang. He's a pretty damn good and durable pitcher, easily better than anyone not named Lackey, Wolf, or Harden and really durable.

No shot Votto gets traded before 2011. Met fans should be much more interested in Brandon Phillips, who is a much more realistic trade candidate.

"by his #'s and projections should be a #2 hitter in the bigs, and he has a very good glove"

Because every projection works out exactly the way it should be. It's not a matter of who the Reds have in their farm. I might as well suggest the Red Sox offer Oscar Tejada (because the Reds need a shortstop), Drake Britton (because the Reds need a pitcher), and a real prospect.

Again. If the Reds trade Votto, think of a price that makes you squirm, then think of another price that would make an objective person squirm, now think of a price that would make a Reds fan who is an atheist suddenly believe in god. Now add all of that together and double it. You won't get Votto for pennies on the dollar.

Johan: Good question about Phillips. I'm sure the Reds would want young pitching...maybe an upgrade at catcher or shortstop...major-league ready tho. While I like him, I don't think Tejada would be ready for awhile.

Really, I don't see Phillips going unless the Reds get at least one quality major-leaguer in return.

I have trouble believing that Votto is available, but you better believe the Braves would be flying FW to Jockerty's house to see that a deal got done. He'd really be a great fit for them and keep their chances in the next few years great with the young core. However it's just dreaming, since I don't think the Reds would be smart to make Votto available.

However I could see the Braves also as a match for Phillips. RH bat that can be fit into the infield (prado could move to 1B for this) and hit well. Hicks/Schafer and a good pitching prospect or 2 (I hate naming prospects in trades since everyone always has different opinions of them)

"Here Red Sox fans, lemme get you started on the right track cuz GOD knows that every freakin post in this thread is going to look like this:

"Red Sox get Votto, Phillips, Harang

Reds get Lowell and Bowden

Thats proabably too much to give to the Reds but Bowden is a garunteed ace, so I dont know if thats fair."

Posted by: sharx | November 10, 2009 at 11:09 PM "

- What are the Red Sox supposed to do with Brandon Phillips. In the past two years Harang is 12-31 with a .285 BAA and a 1.4 WHIP...Why would the Red Sox pay his salary, when they could use that money to pay a Lackey, or a Halladay, or Sheets and Harden, and on top of that keep Bowden.

I mean, are you kidding me?

"I mean, are you kidding me?"

You forgot... Lowell alone could have gotten us Votto, Phillips, Harang, AND Alonso.

Egan....yes, he was kidding. And Theo would do that trade in a heartbeat just to get Votto.

"You forgot... Lowell alone could have gotten us Votto, Phillips, Harang, AND Alonso."
That's still not enough for Lowell you have to throw Cordero in there too and then you got a fair trade.

harang and phillips for havens, tejada, familia, i really dont know, but he would fit

Votto, Bruce, Cueto, Bailey, Stubbs...All are basically untouchable. None of the "Trade Votto" rumors make sense.

If the Reds want to dump payroll...then BTWN now & the HotStove/ST...I could see:

Hernandez being allowed to walk w/o offering Arb.

Gomes being tendered, signed & traded before ST.

Taveras getting wrapped w/ a couple good prospects to get his $4M mistake moved.

Phillips is more than likely gone in short order.. (not only does his contract gets ugly after 2010 - he had hustle/focus issues & fell out of favor w/ Jocketty mid yr - about the same time top100 prospect Todd Frazier was fast-tracked to 2B)

Though the Reds will need both Harang & Arroyo until they have a better read on how Volquez's rehab is going. I'd still expect one (if not both) to be moved by the ASB/non-waiver period (if out of contention in early JUL)...

BUT... If Voltron's rehab looks to be delayed..They may keep both the entire season...Then but-out their opt. yrs at $2M per ($4M total)... Which would save the Reds $19.5M off of the 2011 pay-roll.

PaulyOh,

Thanks for correcting my error.

Anyway, same argument. With a WEAK Offense to begin with, how do the Reds expect to score mroe Runs and win more Games in 2010 if they trade Philips and have Fazier at Second Base?

As it stands now, they are going to haveHanigan at Catcher and Janish at Short Stop.

I guess they think that getting rid of one of Harang, Arroyo or Phillips and signing Ramon Hernandez and Jonny Gomes is going to make up for those losses.

"That's still not enough for Lowell you have to throw Cordero in there too and then you got a fair trade."

Fine. But the Reds pay Cordero's salary and send Theo a good fruit basket.

Here Red Sox fans, lemme get you started on the right track cuz GOD knows that every freakin post in this thread is going to look like this:

"Red Sox get Votto, Phillips, Harang

Reds get Lowell and Bowden

Thats proabably too much to give to the Reds but Bowden is a garunteed ace, so I dont know if thats fair."

Posted by: sharx | November


lol add in hunter jones and i think red sox fans think that same package will get em hanley....

"Jocketty is a moron. He should have traded Harang, Phillips, and Arroyo two years ago: At this point Phillips pretty much sucks. He's a "somewhat" better version of Bill Hall. At this point, Harang is overpaid. Arroyo was always overpaid. Now they are going to "HAVE TO" throw in Votto in if they want to get anything resembling elite young talent. As much as I like Votto, finding a first baseman to hit homeruns at the great american ballpark won't be difficult."

Okay, Jocketty should have traded Harang, Arroyo, and Phillips BEFORE he was even the GM. Good thinking.


Bill Hall's 162 game ave for the last 3 years: .229/.291OBP/17HR/67RBI/5 SB


Brandon Phillips 162 game average for the last 3 years: .276/.324/26HR/97RBI/29 SB/ Gold Glove

Maybe you should know a little bit about what you're talking about before you say it.

"lol add in hunter jones and i think red sox fans think that same package will get em hanley...."

Oh c'mon, enough already. We already traded Hunter Jones. How about Fabian Wiliamson, he's available.

"You forgot... Lowell alone could have gotten us Votto, Phillips, Harang, AND Alonso."
That's still not enough for Lowell you have to throw Cordero in there too and then you got a fair trade.

Posted by: ericbrat20 | November 10, 2009 at 11:23 PM

Well, that may be when Theo should actually start talking. I mean, the Reds should probably throw in Cueto and/or Volquez.

Still think Im not joking you Egan?

I'm thinking Harang and Phillips for Holt, Tejada and Niese.

yea votto's a throw in to get a team to take on a bad contract.

ha. ahaha.

Phillips could be a fit for the Twins

What do you guys think about Arizona as a possible fit for Phillips. They have a bit of money to play with and could use the upgrade at 2nd. Perhaps the Reds could even get Drew in return, which would help cushion the loss of Phillips while also acting as salary relief.

ctown: Reds likely won't win more games in 2010. That's the sad part about being a Reds fan.

Why would the Reds give away their future and their best player just to save 6 Million?


Sorry Mark Polishuk, but that's the dumbest article I've ever read.

metrofoe, the Dbacks have NO MONEY. They were considering not paying Webb a 8.5M opition because of lack of finaces

Marinersfan: Actually, I could see the Reds doing a Lopez for Phillips deal. Remember who the Reds hired as a special assistant to Jockettey...Bill Bavasi (shudder).

I wouldn't like the deal because Lopez looks like BP without speed, and he's seriously challenged in the OBP department.

Jurrjens for Votto. Fairest trade ever proposed on mlbbravesrumors.

If the Reds wanted to cut payroll by 6 mil they could just trade Harang or Arroyo and take on half their contract.

According to Dierkes, the D-Backs will be $16 MM under last year's payroll after arbitration. They could trade for Phillips and still be enter next season with a lower payroll.

I think they're debate with Webb had more to do with his injury. Plus, it could have been smoke and mirrors, as it didn't actually take them long to pick up that option.

Murphy is both useless and worthless, he was one of the worst first basemen in the league last year with no potential to become better.

Posted by: start_wearing_purple | November 10, 2009 at 10:42 PM

Murphy isn't great but to say he has no potential to improve is just flat out ignorant.

I'm definitely behind the Dodgers pursuing Phillips for second, though I'd cringe at the cost of picking him up.

I don't see Phillips going anywhere. Tooth-pick baker loves this guy in the clean up hole. Votto is like the greatest thing in Cincy since Cincinnati Chili. Both of them stay in place. Harang, Arroyo, and Cordero will be packing soon. Just curious, but why no mention of Scott Rolen, or did I miss it????

I'm definitely behind the Dodgers pursuing Phillips for second, though I'd cringe at the cost of picking him up.

Posted by: Mr. LA Sports Fan | November 10, 2009 at 11:48 PM"

Yeah Phillips is not a Dodgers type player.

bravesbacker: No mention of trading Rolen because Jocketty and Castellini have major man-love for him. He won't be traded.

Tillman, Arrieta, Snyder, Erbe and Pie for Votto and Arroyo.

The Reds won't give Votto away, so you have to be realistic. The O's and Reds matchup well and the O's could desperately use Votto's bat.

Can we all just please agree that Votto will not be traded? I mean its mind boggling to see some of these trade rumors. The Mets apparentally are going to trade for Votto, sign Lackey, sign Holliday, and sign Orlando Hudson in one offseason according to some people on here. I know there have been some bad Red Sox proposals in the past but in these past few days I think the Mets have surpassed them in horrible trade proposals. Phillips is likely obtainable but just give up on Votto.

"Jurrjens for Votto. Fairest trade ever proposed on mlbbravesrumors."

That's equal value but I don't think the Braves would do it because they value pitching more than hitting.

"Jurrjens for Votto. Fairest trade ever proposed on mlbbravesrumors."

That's equal value but I don't think the Braves would do it because they value pitching more than hitting.

Posted by: Jay212033 | November 10, 2009 at 11:57 PM"

Then the Braves are stupid.

The Reds probably wanna free up payroll to get another CF. Maybe Pie, Crisp, or someone like that. Tooth-pick loves those kind of guys(Patterson, Taveras). Maybe they could get Crisp for 3/45 lol.

"Murphy isn't great but to say he has no potential to improve is just flat out ignorant."

And the team you root for is...?

Pauly, I know what you mean with this man-crush Rolen thing. I think Jocketty has a Rolen cardboard cut out above his bed!

"And if the Reds are wanting to cut payroll, WHY WOULD THEY TRADE A PLAYER WHO MAKES 437,000?"

Obviously so they can move the Arroyo or Harang contract. No team would take on $12.5MM for either of those two, but if the deal came with Votto, then sure.

"Yeah Phillips is not a Dodgers type player."

Huh? Please explain. Solid defender, power and speed. Perhaps you're speaking of the relatively low OBP?


Finally, Mets fans - stop..please.

"Then the Braves are stupid."

Let me know when the Dodgers win 14 straight....

I honestly can't think of a team that would take on such incredible payroll for average starters in Harang and Arroyo?? And not only that, but they would have to TRADE players to get them!? This is why the REDS perennially suck.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment


Top Stories



Search MLBTR

Lijit Search

MLBTR Features



Recent Posts


MLBTR Mailing List

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Rumors By Team



Monthly Archives


Live Chats


Tuesdays at 2 p.m. CST



Site Map     Contact     About     Advertise     Privacy Policy     Widget     Twitter     Rss Feed


MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com.