Headlines

  • Albert Pujols To Interview For Angels’ Managerial Vacancy, May Be “Leading Choice”
  • Bill Schmidt Will Not Return As Rockies’ GM
  • Brian Snitker Will Not Return As Braves’ Manager In 2026
  • Angels To Have New Manager In 2026
  • Rays Sale To Patrick Zalupski’s Group Officially Completed
  • Guardians Promote Chase DeLauter For Wild Card Series
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

Remove Ads
  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Athletics
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2026-27 MLB Free Agent List
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Ownership Notes: Dodgers, Astros, Selig

By Ben Nicholson-Smith | September 9, 2011 at 10:03am CDT

Two of the least stable ownership situations in baseball can be found in Los Angeles and Houston. Here's the latest on bids for the Dodgers and Astros…

  • MLB's delay with Jim Crane's bid had nothing to do with switching leagues and "everything to do with his background," according to Bob Nightengale of USA Today (Twitter links).
  • There won't be enough time to realign the leagues by 2012, so we aren't likely to see expanded playoffs next year, according to Nightengale.
  • An attorney for Dodgers owner Frank McCourt called Bill Burke's $1.2 billion bid for the Dodgers a "publicity stunt" in documents filed in court this week, according to Bill Shaikin of the LA Times. McCourt remains intent on keeping the Dodgers, Shaikin reports.
  • Incoming Astros owner Jim Crane told Joe Holley of the Houston Chronicle that he's becoming frustrated with the slow pace of the ownership transfer and the public speculation about the reasons for the holdup. Crane also pointed out that his contract with Drayton McLane goes through November 30th, which means a deal has to be finalized by then unless the sides agree to extend the window.
  • However, as Richard Justice of the Houston Chronicle points out, there are a thousand reasons to question the character of an incoming owner, so commissioner Bud Selig probably won't look kindly on Crane's comments.
Share Repost Send via email

Houston Astros Los Angeles Dodgers

Olney On Mauer, Morneau, Wright, Royals
Main
Giants Notes: Burrell, Ross, Sanchez, Whiteside
View Comments (14)
Post a Comment

14 Comments

  1. John W

    14 years ago

    Wow, McCourt’s own lawyers are turning on him, have they been paid?

    Reply
    • John 87

      14 years ago

      They’re not turning on him…

      Reply
      • chico65

        14 years ago

        Yeah, if I were an attorney there would be no way I would run away from all those billable hours.  Hell, the man’s name even contains the word court.  Frank just can’t help himself- it’s part of the very fiber of his being. 

        Reply
  2. monkeyspanked

    14 years ago

    Bud doesn’t want to end up with another POS owner like McCourt.  Take your time Bud.

    Reply
  3. Gumby65

    14 years ago

    McCourt Lawyers: Dodgers offer a “publicity stunt”.  What McCourt lawyers forgot to tell you: Most likely at least partially engineered by McCourt.

    Reply
    • BlueSkyLA

      14 years ago

      For what purpose?

      Reply
      • UnknownPoster

        14 years ago

        If he has an offer for 1.2 billion, then he can go to others he has discussed selling the team to and say “someone is going to give me 1.2 billion, how much are you gonna give me”? He picks a big number, with no one to back it up, and then can turn it into millions more than he should get. Or he can even say he was able to get this offer so he must be able to run the team, and Bud should let him stay the owner.

        Reply
        • BlueSkyLA

          14 years ago

          Ah, I see. So you’re saying that McCourt thinks that people with billions of dollars to spend on a sports franchise got that kind of money by being total chumps.

          Reply
          • UnknownPoster

            14 years ago

            thats true. But if someone if offering 1.1billion, then hears that someone is offering 1.2, well, he’s gone this far, he raises it to 1.3billion, and McCourt just made an extra 200 million, and the guy who is paying him thinks he raised his bid just to get his property. It was a good try by McCourt if its what he was trying to do, but too many people called BS

            Reply
            • BlueSkyLA

              14 years ago

              Only if he’s a fool. A pro sports team is valued like any other business, based on the profits it can return to its owners. In any event the idea that McCourt could benefit somehow by fabricating an offer is absurd. The commissioner is trying to make case to the bankruptcy court judge that the best way to settle the team’s debts is a sale to new ownership. A big offer doesn’t help McCourt retain ownership, which is what he says he wants. So no matter how you look at it, it doesn’t make sense.

              Reply
              • UnknownPoster

                14 years ago

                First, sorry this is really long. Wasn’t my intention when I started typing

                You don’t seem to be understanding the thought process behind this, so Ill try to come from a different angle. When a person sells a house, they choose a price that they think fits in the market. Then that price is either met, raised or lowered depending on how the market plays the house. If many like the house, then the price goes up, if no one calls the owner has to lower the price.
                Maybe what is confusing is the large numbers and that a .1 billion dollar raise=100M. These numbers are impossible for most to fathom. So Ill try to use easier numbers. A guy is selling a house for $50,000. A person is interested, very interested in fact, in the house at 50,000. However, someone hears that another person is interested and offers 60,000. The owner takes that 60,000 offer back to the first buyer and says, this is the offer I have in hand. Do you want to raise it or not. That first guy loves this house, and then offers 70,000, in order to get his asset that he likes. The house is the same house that was valued at 50,000, but the market rose the price to 70,000. An extra 20,000 in the pocket of the original owner because he had two people interested in his asset. 

                McCourt wanted the same thing. Lets say he had someone offer 1.1B for the Dodgers. If he says he has an offer for 1.2B, then he can take it back to the first person and say it’ll cost 1.3B to buy the team. There you go, an extra 200M.

                As with your 2nd part, McCourt has been trying to prove he can run this team well and doesnt need MLB to run it. If he can say he is getting good offers for the team, he could try to get permission to run the sale of the team at least. He would therefore get to pick the deal he likes and also any part where he can get power back from Selig is a win.

                Reply
                • BlueSkyLA

                  14 years ago

                  If a person puts a home up for sale for twice its market value, he generally gets no offers, not higher offers than market value. And I say twice, because recent valuations of the Dodgers have been in the neighborhood of $750m. Also, buying a sports franchise isn’t about love, it’s about return on investment. Weighing down the return on investment calculation is the fact that the team is currently operating in the red — mainly due to excess leverage. Yet, that situation, among others, still has to be corrected for the team to return to profitability. No, the Dodgers don’t suddenly become worth more than a billion because someone, and only supposedly, makes an offer of that size. We will see what the team is worth when it actually goes up for sale. The price can be expected to inflate beyond recent appraisals only if multiple bidders are involved.

                  As for the sale, owners never get to pick who buys a team. Even under more normal circumstances, sales are subject to the approval of the commissioner. It’s not clear that the bankruptcy judge is interested in curtailing MLB’s authority in this area. His main interest is in making the creditors whole.

                  Reply
                  • UnknownPoster

                    14 years ago

                    Ugh i was done with my response and it deleted itself :/

                    Basically, the team is worth 750M, but the team, stadium, tv rights etc are valued at closer to over 900M. 

                    And when i say love in this context, I don’t mean love as in “I love the Dodgers, they are my favorite team”, but rather “I love the potential this team has to be productive and make money in the next 5, 10, or 20 years”. 

                    As with the debt, the reason they are being sold is the incredible debt McCourt cant pay. McCourt will be forced to use the money from the trial to pay off Jaime and the debts. Its the point of the sale.

                    And with your comment of multiple bidders… THATS WHAT IVE BEEN SAYING! there are multiple people interested in the team and they are raising the price. 

                    Finally, the sale part. If a owner controls the team, while he cannot pick the deal AND get it approved, he can choose which offer he likes, which he brings to Selig. Selig then takes the offer and him and the other owners have to approve it. 

                    Reply
  4. Gumby65

    14 years ago

    Dodgers new owners in 2012?

    A bunch (like, three busloads) of former McCourt law firms.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

    Top Stories

    Albert Pujols To Interview For Angels’ Managerial Vacancy, May Be “Leading Choice”

    Bill Schmidt Will Not Return As Rockies’ GM

    Brian Snitker Will Not Return As Braves’ Manager In 2026

    Angels To Have New Manager In 2026

    Rays Sale To Patrick Zalupski’s Group Officially Completed

    Guardians Promote Chase DeLauter For Wild Card Series

    Bruce Bochy Will Not Return As Rangers Manager Amid “Financial Uncertainty”

    Liam Hendriks Undergoes Ulnar Nerve Transposition Surgery

    Twins Fire Rocco Baldelli

    Giants Fire Bob Melvin

    Pirates Sign Manager Don Kelly To Extension

    Pete Alonso To Opt Out Of Mets Contract, Enter Free Agency

    Padres Place Ramón Laureano On Injured List Due To Finger Fracture

    Willson Contreras Will Consider Waiving No-Trade Clause But Prefers To Remain With Cardinals

    Cade Horton To Miss At Least One Playoff Series Due To Rib Fracture

    MLB To Take Over Mariners’ Broadcasts In 2026

    Nolan Arenado More Open To Waiving No-Trade Clause As Cardinals Plan To Rebuild

    Sonny Gray Will Consider Waiving No-Trade Clause This Offseason

    Nationals To Hire Paul Toboni As President Of Baseball Operations

    Astros’ Luis Garcia Will Miss 2026 Season Due To Elbow Surgery

    Recent

    The Opener: Wild Cards, Rockies, Managerial Vacancies

    MLBTR Podcast: Mike Elias On The State Of The Orioles

    MLB Mailbag: Cubs, Mets, Guardians, Athletics

    Albert Pujols To Interview For Angels’ Managerial Vacancy, May Be “Leading Choice”

    Rockies Expected To Consider Thad Levine In Front Office Search

    Marlins Notes: Alcantara, First Base, Garrett, Meyer

    Braves Outright Jarred Kelenic, Four Others

    Rays To Look For Catching Help

    22 Players Elect Free Agency

    Giants Notes: Coaches, Eldridge, Smith, Bochy

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • Every MLB Trade In July
    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android App Store Google Play

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
    • Front Office Originals
    • Tim Dierkes' MLB Mailbag
    • Front Office Fantasy Baseball
    • MLBTR Podcast
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2026-27 MLB Free Agent List
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    Do not Sell or Share My Personal Information

    hide arrows scroll to top

    Register

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version